Regardless of what President Roosevelt privately thought about Hitler, he was determined to maintain cordial—sometimes friendly—relations with the Nazi regime in the 1930s.
A belligerent dictator building up his military arsenal. Nearby countries watching nervously. Free World leaders desperately offering concessions to appease him. That description applied to Adolf Hitler in the 1930s and, until very recently, to the mullahs of Iran.
We all know how the first story ended—in World War II and the Holocaust. The second story was hurtling towards a similar catastrophe, but the U.S. air strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities have changed all that—and demonstrated that our nation’s leaders have learned a crucial lesson from history.
The Treaty of Versailles, signed by world leaders following World War I, required the complete disarmament of Germany. But when Hitler came to power in 1933, he thumbed his nose at the international community and vowed to remilitarize. The Nazi regime introduced conscription, resurrected the air force, and ordered Germany’s industries to undertake mass weapons manufacturing. Neither the United States nor its allies interfered.
Numerous American corporations assisted the German rearmament effort. General Motors and Ford sold military vehicles to Hitler. IBM provided tabulation machines. Standard Oil of New Jersey and DuPont supplied technology for producing synthetic rubber, which would be crucial to the German war machine. The Roosevelt administration did not prevent those companies from helping Hitler.
It’s not that FDR failed to recognize the threat Hitler posed to the Free World. At a 1934 press conference, he shared an anecdote that vividly illustrated the Nazi menace. “The school children in Germany are now going through an educational process,” the president said. He then recalled what he had been told by an American professor who recently visited friends in Germany.
The professor had overheard her hosts’ eight year-old son saying his nightly prayers. “He kneeled down at his mother’s knee and said his prayers and ended in good German, like a good German boy, and he said, ‘Dear God, please permit it that I shall die with a French bullet in my heart’,” FDR told the reporters. “That is what has got the French scared when ninety percent of the German people are thinking and talking that way. If I were a Frenchman, I would be scared too.”
After concluding the anecdote, Roosevelt emphasized that what he had just described was strictly off the record and could not be quoted. He did not want to risk offending Hitler. That fear also explained why, in hundreds of press conferences between 1933 and 1938, FDR never once criticized Hitler’s brutal persecution of German Jews.
Regardless of what President Roosevelt privately thought about Hitler, he was determined to maintain cordial—sometimes friendly—relations with the Nazi regime in the 1930s. That even extended to trying to sell helium to Nazi Germany, despite the danger that Hitler would use it for military purposes.
This happened in late 1937. Roosevelt told Congress that providing helium to Germany to power its Zeppelin airships would demonstrate to Hitler that the U.S. was “a good neighbor.” Secretary of the Interior Harold Ickes opposed the proposal, arguing that it would be dangerous to provide the Nazis with a gas that was “of military importance.” The sale could not proceed without the interior secretary’s approval.
So FDR suggested to Ickes, during a cabinet meeting, that he could alleviate Ickes of responsibility by giving him a letter stating it was his “judgment, as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, that this helium was not of military importance.”
The debate dragged on through mid-1938, at which point politics intervened. With congressional midterm elections looming in November, a senior presidential adviser, Thomas Corcoran, confided to Secretary Ickes that (according to Ickes’s diary) the president had decided to drop the issue, because “if we now ship helium to Germany, it would offend the Jewish vote.” In retrospect, Roosevelt’s concern about the Democrats losing Jewish votes may seem puzzling, since the overwhelming majority of American Jews consistently voted for Democratic candidates. But it has happened more than once that fear of the Jewish vote was more significant than actual Jewish voting patterns.
The president never wavered from his pre-war preference for appeasing Nazi Germany. He compelled Secretary Ickes to delete criticism of Hitler from several of his speeches. Roosevelt also supported the Munich agreement to dismember Czechoslovakia. And FDR’s Commerce Department even quietly advised the Nazi regime on how to deceptively label their exports in order to evade anti-Nazi boycotters. Needless to say, none of those policies helped stave off war.
Fortunately, President Trump appears to have learned from his predecessor’s mistake. Appeasing belligerent foreign dictators, and allowing them to develop dangerous weapons, is not the path to peace.
Cartoonist Sidney Strube, in the London newspaper The Daily Express on January 22, 1940, dramatized Hitler’s intensifying military threat to Germany’s neighbors. Note the broken sword, labeled “Pledges,” at his feet.
Dr. Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies and author of more than 20 books about Jewish history and the Holocaust. His book The Road to October 7: Hamas, the Holocaust, and the Eternal War Against the Jews will be published on October 1, 2025, by The Jewish Publication Society / University of Nebraska Press.
His nomination dramatically underscores the tensions within the Democratic Party over Israel and the burgeoning growth of anti-Zionist sentiment among progressive voters.
Blending humor with hard truths, Horwitz leans into the outlandishness of anti-Jewish conspiracy theories — at one point performing as a shapeshifting lizard from outer space.
Friedman has a method: let people speak freely — and the more they talk, the clearer it becomes how little some of them actually understand about the topics they’re protesting.
“American values” was once shorthand for the animating ideals of liberal democracy. Now it’s become politicized. As we celebrate July 4th, Jews must lead the way in reclaiming an idea that is meant to unite us, not divide us.
“American values” was once shorthand for the animating ideals of liberal democracy. Now it’s become politicized. As we celebrate July 4, Jews must lead the way in reclaiming an idea that is meant to unite us, not divide us.
What Trump Learned from FDR & Hitler
Rafael Medoff
A belligerent dictator building up his military arsenal. Nearby countries watching nervously. Free World leaders desperately offering concessions to appease him. That description applied to Adolf Hitler in the 1930s and, until very recently, to the mullahs of Iran.
We all know how the first story ended—in World War II and the Holocaust. The second story was hurtling towards a similar catastrophe, but the U.S. air strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities have changed all that—and demonstrated that our nation’s leaders have learned a crucial lesson from history.
The Treaty of Versailles, signed by world leaders following World War I, required the complete disarmament of Germany. But when Hitler came to power in 1933, he thumbed his nose at the international community and vowed to remilitarize. The Nazi regime introduced conscription, resurrected the air force, and ordered Germany’s industries to undertake mass weapons manufacturing. Neither the United States nor its allies interfered.
Numerous American corporations assisted the German rearmament effort. General Motors and Ford sold military vehicles to Hitler. IBM provided tabulation machines. Standard Oil of New Jersey and DuPont supplied technology for producing synthetic rubber, which would be crucial to the German war machine. The Roosevelt administration did not prevent those companies from helping Hitler.
It’s not that FDR failed to recognize the threat Hitler posed to the Free World. At a 1934 press conference, he shared an anecdote that vividly illustrated the Nazi menace. “The school children in Germany are now going through an educational process,” the president said. He then recalled what he had been told by an American professor who recently visited friends in Germany.
The professor had overheard her hosts’ eight year-old son saying his nightly prayers. “He kneeled down at his mother’s knee and said his prayers and ended in good German, like a good German boy, and he said, ‘Dear God, please permit it that I shall die with a French bullet in my heart’,” FDR told the reporters. “That is what has got the French scared when ninety percent of the German people are thinking and talking that way. If I were a Frenchman, I would be scared too.”
After concluding the anecdote, Roosevelt emphasized that what he had just described was strictly off the record and could not be quoted. He did not want to risk offending Hitler. That fear also explained why, in hundreds of press conferences between 1933 and 1938, FDR never once criticized Hitler’s brutal persecution of German Jews.
Regardless of what President Roosevelt privately thought about Hitler, he was determined to maintain cordial—sometimes friendly—relations with the Nazi regime in the 1930s. That even extended to trying to sell helium to Nazi Germany, despite the danger that Hitler would use it for military purposes.
This happened in late 1937. Roosevelt told Congress that providing helium to Germany to power its Zeppelin airships would demonstrate to Hitler that the U.S. was “a good neighbor.” Secretary of the Interior Harold Ickes opposed the proposal, arguing that it would be dangerous to provide the Nazis with a gas that was “of military importance.” The sale could not proceed without the interior secretary’s approval.
So FDR suggested to Ickes, during a cabinet meeting, that he could alleviate Ickes of responsibility by giving him a letter stating it was his “judgment, as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, that this helium was not of military importance.”
The debate dragged on through mid-1938, at which point politics intervened. With congressional midterm elections looming in November, a senior presidential adviser, Thomas Corcoran, confided to Secretary Ickes that (according to Ickes’s diary) the president had decided to drop the issue, because “if we now ship helium to Germany, it would offend the Jewish vote.” In retrospect, Roosevelt’s concern about the Democrats losing Jewish votes may seem puzzling, since the overwhelming majority of American Jews consistently voted for Democratic candidates. But it has happened more than once that fear of the Jewish vote was more significant than actual Jewish voting patterns.
The president never wavered from his pre-war preference for appeasing Nazi Germany. He compelled Secretary Ickes to delete criticism of Hitler from several of his speeches. Roosevelt also supported the Munich agreement to dismember Czechoslovakia. And FDR’s Commerce Department even quietly advised the Nazi regime on how to deceptively label their exports in order to evade anti-Nazi boycotters. Needless to say, none of those policies helped stave off war.
Fortunately, President Trump appears to have learned from his predecessor’s mistake. Appeasing belligerent foreign dictators, and allowing them to develop dangerous weapons, is not the path to peace.
Dr. Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies and author of more than 20 books about Jewish history and the Holocaust. His book The Road to October 7: Hamas, the Holocaust, and the Eternal War Against the Jews will be published on October 1, 2025, by The Jewish Publication Society / University of Nebraska Press.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Securing the Jewish Future Begins Now — and AJU is Leading the Way
New Doctorate in Jewish Leadership Launched for Mid-Career Professionals
Depravity in Glastonbury
Instead of Shouting “America Hates Jews,” Let’s Shout Something Smarter
To Win Back America, Democrats Will Need an Abundance of Patriotism
Where Were You on July 4, 1976?
Dealing With Mamdani
His nomination dramatically underscores the tensions within the Democratic Party over Israel and the burgeoning growth of anti-Zionist sentiment among progressive voters.
A Bisl Torah — Tiny, Little Jewish Joys
These are small acts that anchor us in an ever-shifting world.
Hayek’s Fatal Conceit and the Red Heifer
A Moment in Time: “4th of July – A Time of Reflection”
Passing Through – A poem for Parsha Chukat
We’ve been passing through lands lately without asking permission…
Sderot Mayor in L.A., Mauthausen Liberation Anniversary, Braid Show’s Debut, LAJFF Kickoff
Notable people and events in the Jewish LA community.
Rabbis of LA | How Rabbi Nancy Myers Broke the Stained-Glass Ceiling
If there’s one thing that’s characterized Temple Beth David’s Rabbi Nancy Myers’ career, it’s her persistence.
Laughter, Pain and Truth: Abel Horwitz’s ‘Kosher Salt’ Tackles Antisemitism Head-On
Blending humor with hard truths, Horwitz leans into the outlandishness of anti-Jewish conspiracy theories — at one point performing as a shapeshifting lizard from outer space.
YouTuber Nate Friedman Exposes Anti-Israel Protesters in Viral Street Interviews
Friedman has a method: let people speak freely — and the more they talk, the clearer it becomes how little some of them actually understand about the topics they’re protesting.
Pride Isn’t Cancelled. It’s Just in Mitzpe Ramon Now.
Q&A: Local Iranian Jewish Journalist Expresses Optimism for Iran’s Future
In a recent phone interview with The Journal, Melamed discussed what a secular Iran might look like.
A Deafening Silence
A Jewish woman burned to death on American soil. The violence wasn’t random. It was ideological, premeditated, and still, almost no one says her name.
Nothing Fishy About These Barbecue Recipes
Whether you are planning a Fourth of July barbecue, an outdoor Shabbat or picnic-style meal, “light and delicious” is the goal.
Refreshing Summer Salads
Bright, earthy and deeply refreshing, this salad brings together the forest-like aroma of fresh herbs with a sweet and nutty crunch.
Table for Five: chukat
Complaint Department
Print Issue: Reclaiming American Values | July 4, 2025
“American values” was once shorthand for the animating ideals of liberal democracy. Now it’s become politicized. As we celebrate July 4th, Jews must lead the way in reclaiming an idea that is meant to unite us, not divide us.
Sephardic Torah from the Holy Land | A Dilemma in Damascus
Halakha and ethics: a case study.
Why Jews Must Reclaim American Values
“American values” was once shorthand for the animating ideals of liberal democracy. Now it’s become politicized. As we celebrate July 4, Jews must lead the way in reclaiming an idea that is meant to unite us, not divide us.
Rosner’s Domain | What Are We Waiting For?
We are waiting. What other choice do we have?
Dawn of a New Era in the Middle East
The ceasefire that President Trump brokered is the second crucial step in that process, not the end of the story but the start of a new chapter.
More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.