In the hours and days following the attempted assassination of former president Donald Trump, the internet was awash with statements from his political enemies on the left condemning the shooting. Beyond wishing him a speedy recovery, the most common message from Democrat politicians was a condemnation of “political violence” — and a statement that politically motivated violence has no place in America. Even the most vocal Trump haters, like Senator Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, joined the chorus with their own denunciations.
Noble, right? Well, until you zoom out and remember that this is the same party that has turned a blind eye to politically motivated violence for the past four years. Since 2020, the Democrats have exhibited a highly selective desire to prosecute political violence that aligns with their own goals and objectives. That year, the same American left that was so moved by individual instances of Trump supporters committing crimes or the white supremacist march in Charlottesville suddenly went mute when violent mobs descended upon American cities in June, looting buildings, destroying countless businesses, stealing property, and plunging the country into an extended period of crime-filled unrest. In that instance, political violence was acceptable, deemed by the left as the “language of the unheard” and a reasonable response to “the frustration of centuries of oppression.”
That summer heralded in the Democratic approach to political violence that still exists in large swathes of the left to this day, as we have also seen over the past nine months since the attacks in Israel. If the left believes there is “no place for political violence” in America, as politicians like AOC claim, why have they ceded so much space to pro-Palestinian activists who regularly chant “From the River to the Sea” or openly call for “Intifada Revolution?” These slogans, which are direct calls for violent incitement, are not fringe beliefs held by a tiny portion of Democrats — they have echoed through the streets of blue cities across America, have been chanted by college students praised by Bernie Sanders as “peaceful demonstrators,” and were even described as an “aspirational call for freedom and human rights” by sitting congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.).
On top of that, in blue jurisdictions, those who commit this selective group of politically motivated crimes receive immunity. Take the summer of 2020, when countless looters in New York City were caught on tape with their faces visible and hundreds were arrested. One year later, a review of NYPD data showed that most of the cases were dismissed by local district attorneys and courts, and that most of the actual convictions were for charges like trespassing that carried no jail time. Same applies to the Hamas lovers currently intimidating Jews in blue American cities — just weeks before the Trump shooting, violent Palestinian protesters who menaced a synagogue in Los Angeles, leaving several Jewish members bloodied, escaped with only one arrest. This is the rule, not the exception, for pro-Palestinian rallies in Democratic areas—the threatening mobs are rarely prosecuted, the foreign ringleaders inciting violence are never deported, and the violence is downplayed or downright ignored.
This is the rule, not the exception, for pro-Palestinian rallies in Democratic areas — the threatening mobs are rarely prosecuted, the foreign ringleaders inciting violence are never deported, and the violence is downplayed or downright ignored.
The examples of hypocrisy are endless, but one major takeaway should be clear: do not evaluate Democrats by their hasty claims that “political violence is never acceptable.” Evaluate them by their actions — their refusal to condemn far-left incitement, their unwillingness to jail and prosecute perpetrators of left-wing political violence, their embrace of a menacing atmosphere of street unrest when it serves their political bottom lines. Once you look past their half-baked lip service, their views on the matter are crystal clear: Democrats not only have no issue with the right kind of political violence, they are also a major reason why it abounds in America today.
Dr. Sheila Nazarian is a Los Angeles physician whose family escaped to America from Iran. She stars in the Emmy-nominated Netflix series “Skin Decision: Before and After.“
Do Democrats Have an Issue with Political Violence?
Sheila Nazarian
In the hours and days following the attempted assassination of former president Donald Trump, the internet was awash with statements from his political enemies on the left condemning the shooting. Beyond wishing him a speedy recovery, the most common message from Democrat politicians was a condemnation of “political violence” — and a statement that politically motivated violence has no place in America. Even the most vocal Trump haters, like Senator Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, joined the chorus with their own denunciations.
Noble, right? Well, until you zoom out and remember that this is the same party that has turned a blind eye to politically motivated violence for the past four years. Since 2020, the Democrats have exhibited a highly selective desire to prosecute political violence that aligns with their own goals and objectives. That year, the same American left that was so moved by individual instances of Trump supporters committing crimes or the white supremacist march in Charlottesville suddenly went mute when violent mobs descended upon American cities in June, looting buildings, destroying countless businesses, stealing property, and plunging the country into an extended period of crime-filled unrest. In that instance, political violence was acceptable, deemed by the left as the “language of the unheard” and a reasonable response to “the frustration of centuries of oppression.”
That summer heralded in the Democratic approach to political violence that still exists in large swathes of the left to this day, as we have also seen over the past nine months since the attacks in Israel. If the left believes there is “no place for political violence” in America, as politicians like AOC claim, why have they ceded so much space to pro-Palestinian activists who regularly chant “From the River to the Sea” or openly call for “Intifada Revolution?” These slogans, which are direct calls for violent incitement, are not fringe beliefs held by a tiny portion of Democrats — they have echoed through the streets of blue cities across America, have been chanted by college students praised by Bernie Sanders as “peaceful demonstrators,” and were even described as an “aspirational call for freedom and human rights” by sitting congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.).
On top of that, in blue jurisdictions, those who commit this selective group of politically motivated crimes receive immunity. Take the summer of 2020, when countless looters in New York City were caught on tape with their faces visible and hundreds were arrested. One year later, a review of NYPD data showed that most of the cases were dismissed by local district attorneys and courts, and that most of the actual convictions were for charges like trespassing that carried no jail time. Same applies to the Hamas lovers currently intimidating Jews in blue American cities — just weeks before the Trump shooting, violent Palestinian protesters who menaced a synagogue in Los Angeles, leaving several Jewish members bloodied, escaped with only one arrest. This is the rule, not the exception, for pro-Palestinian rallies in Democratic areas—the threatening mobs are rarely prosecuted, the foreign ringleaders inciting violence are never deported, and the violence is downplayed or downright ignored.
The examples of hypocrisy are endless, but one major takeaway should be clear: do not evaluate Democrats by their hasty claims that “political violence is never acceptable.” Evaluate them by their actions — their refusal to condemn far-left incitement, their unwillingness to jail and prosecute perpetrators of left-wing political violence, their embrace of a menacing atmosphere of street unrest when it serves their political bottom lines. Once you look past their half-baked lip service, their views on the matter are crystal clear: Democrats not only have no issue with the right kind of political violence, they are also a major reason why it abounds in America today.
Dr. Sheila Nazarian is a Los Angeles physician whose family escaped to America from Iran. She stars in the Emmy-nominated Netflix series “Skin Decision: Before and After.“
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
‘As a Jew’ Jews—Shut Up!
Steve Ballmer and the Ecstasy of Hubris
Repair the World and Hillel International Engaging 800+ College Students in 9/11 Volunteer Program
Jim Joseph Foundation Releases Unprecedented Research on Jewish Young Adults
‘The Bridge’ Between Rock Music and Healing
Know Before Whom You Stand — A poem for Parsha Nitzavim-Vayeilech
A Statement About Donald Trump’s Apocrypha
A Moment in Time: Rosh HaShanah – We Ascend
A Bisl Torah — All Over Again
Repenting includes examining and admitting our mistakes. Seeking forgiveness. Determining to do better. Being better. Every single day.
Print Issue: AKLA Rises | September 4, 2026
A local teen initiative to build Jewish pride expands to other cities and shows the enduring power of curiosity and Jewish identity.
New Book, ‘Digital Warrior,’ Goes Inside Israel’s Message War
Lester brings the reader into the communications operation during the war: the videos, arguments, mistakes, debates over what to post and the race to respond to events moving faster than any communications office could control.
Love, Drugs and Prison: The True Story Behind ‘10 Kilos’
Hanging Out at the Jewish American Summit
Among the speakers, Adam Milstein, a real estate investor, philanthropist and co-founder of the fast-growing Impact Forum, urged attendees to frame antisemitism as an American issue and not just a Jewish issue.
Eyal Shani’s Recipe for Kosher Cuisine: Wild, Bold and Full of Life
The Beverly Hills menu features some of Malka’s best-known dishes, including the Queen Malka Schnitzel, Branzino Hraime, onglet served with roasted white peaches and Israeli-style hummus.
A Festive French Roast
One of my favorite things to cook for the Jewish holidays is a beautiful French roast. It’s so very festive and is perfect to feed a hungry crowd.
Table for Five: Nitzavim-Vayelech
Hidden and Revealed
The Genius of the Marx Brothers
Like the greatest satirists, such as Jonathan Swift and Mark Twain, they chose comedy over accusation to mock the folly of society and add levity to dark times. But their aim was not levity alone.
AKLA Rises
From a Local Experiment to a National Program: AKLA Expands Its Vision for Jewish Teens
Rosner’s Domain | What Do You ‘Know’ About Altalena?
The Altalena was a munitions ship fired upon and sunk by the newly formed Israel Defense Forces in 1948.
“The Star on the Grave”
Better Kisser Than a Cook
Sometimes love arrives ahead of you, in spite of you. Cooking slowly became a way of being there for the people I love. A wordless language that says: I see you. I hear you. You’re worth the onion-chopping.
Israel’s Brain-Drain Debate Is Asking the Wrong Question
If an experienced professional with rare expertise leaves Israel, the impact cannot be understood simply by adding another person to a brain-drain statistic. The more relevant question is how many people with comparable experience remain, how essential that expertise is and how easily it can be rebuilt.
Conspiracy Theories Have Never Been Good for the Jews; They Won’t Be Good for Israel
Conspiracy theories and antisemitism do have an affinity and important features in common, including the tendency to frame accusations in such a way that refutation does not affect the accuser. Having suffered from this for centuries, do we really want it in our public life?
I Am an American, a Jew, and a Progressive Democrat. Can I Still Be All Three?
Any Democrat seeking to lead the party in 2028 should embrace the politics of addition by subtraction and reject any movement seeking to end all aid to Israel and replace America’s constitutional order.
Apprenticeship in Mystery: Working the Infinite into the Ordinary
We live in an age with zero patience for uncertainty. We have answers for everything, almost magically. And somehow, we still seem to know nothing about what it means to be here.
Deuteronomy’s Directions for America
Moses’ speech was addressed to people standing on the threshold of a new chapter. The American story is similarly turning a new page.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.