This new academic year, as universities across America trumpeted their commitment to the pursuit of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI), for many Jewish students, this otherwise laudable goal has become entirely devoid of meaning, with the campus turning into a hotbed of antisemitism, Jew hatred and exclusion.
According to the ADL, in the last year, antisemitic incidents across the US reached record highs, with antisemitic activity reported on college and university campuses surging 41%.
Although these statistics should sadly not come as a surprise to anyone, what is staggering is the extent to which university administrators and leaders are willing to excuse and turn a blind eye to antisemitism, all in the name of the sacred pursuit of academic freedom and free speech.
When in January this year, on the eve of International Holocaust Remembrance Day, we called out the University of Michigan for refusing to condemn a group of students who called for an “intifada revolution,” the University justified their refusal to act by responding that “[o]ne of our most important values as an institution – one we teach and model in and out of the classroom and one that is embodied in our commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion – is the respect for those who have different opinions, have different life experiences, hold different world views.”
In this particular case, the “different world view” they were calling to respect was a direct and unadulterated call for violence, placing Jewish students, faculty and staff, in harm’s way.
In August last year, when a number of registered student groups at UC Berkeley Law School passed a by-law to exclude Zionist speakers, the University excused this by claiming Zionism was merely an expression of a “political viewpoint” and therefore protected speech under the First Amendment, not the inherent and indispensable part of Jewish identity that it is. In response, we filed a Title VI claim under the Civil Rights Act, on the basis of the University condoning the wholesale exclusion of a group of students, Jewish students in this case, on the basis of their identity, national original and shared ancestry.
And then most recently, last week, during Yom Kippur, the holiest day of the Jewish calendar, the Ivy League University of Pennsylvania hosted a ‘Palestine Writes’ literature event. Whilst a celebration of Palestinian literature and art ought to be embraced, this was mostly a festival of hate, featuring a who’s who of antisemites, extremists and even convicted terrorists.
One of the keynote speakers was Roger Waters, who has repeatedly engaged in antisemitism, including making such mendacious and racist claims about the “the Jewish lobby”. Waters is now being investigated by the German police, over engaging in Holocaust distortion, while wearing a mock-SS uniform during a recent series of concerts in the country. The US State Department has even said that Waters has “a long track record of using antisemitic tropes to denigrate Jewish people.”
Another speaker, Randa Abdel-Fattah, has previously claimed that “Israel is a demonic, sick project and I can’t way for the day we commemorate its end.”
Marc Lamont-Hill, also speaking at the festival, was fired by CNN after effectively calling for Israel’s destruction. He has also previously said that calls for Palestinians to “reject hatred and terrorism” were “offensive and counterproductive.”
Meanwhile, Susan Abulhawa, the executive director of the Palestine Writes festival, has previously expressed support for US-designated Palestinian terror groups Hamas, Islamic Jihad and PFLP, describing their terrorist actions, including those which have resulted in the murder of American citizens, as “self-defense by resistance groups,” while comparing Israel to Nazis and calling for a boycott of the Jewish state.
Although Penn President Liz Magill released a statement noting that some of the speakers at the event had a “troubling history of engaging in antisemitism by speaking and acting in ways that denigrate Jewish people,” Penn failed to take any meaningful steps in response, claiming they “fiercely support the free exchange of ideas as central to our educational mission.”
It is inconceivable that Penn would have permitted such a festival had it promoted, say, hatred against members of the African American or LGBTQ community, and rightfully so. Yet such hatred and incitement against Jewish students is being excused and whitewashed, while their voices are being marginalized, silenced and excluded, all in the name of free speech and a perverse interpretation of the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) policy.
Perhaps as recipients of federal funding, universities ought to be reminded of their obligations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, national origin and shared ancestry, or in circumstances where universities fail to take action against the creation of hostile environments on campus. This is a point that was also reinforced in the historic May 2023 White House Plan National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism.
Indeed, legislation has already been proposed in Congress to rescind federal funding from universities that allow antisemitism on campuses.
It is imperative to recognize that, even in circumstances where antisemitic hate speech in question is protected under the First Amendment, there is still an obligation for university leaders to condemn these attacks on Jewish students, support them and underscore that their concerns are real.
In order to guide the universities to determine the kind of speech and actions that qualify as antisemitism, universities ought to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) Working Definition of Antisemitism, the most widely endorsed definition of antisemitism in the world.
If universities truly want to pursue DEI, it is time Jewish students were included in this discussion and academic freedom no longer used as an excuse for Jew hatred.
Arsen Ostrovsky is a human rights attorney and CEO of the International Legal Forum, an independent NGO and global network of lawyers committed to combating antisemitism. You can also follow him on Twitter (‘X’) at: @Ostrov_A.
If Universities Truly Want to Pursue DEI, It’s Time to Include Jewish Students
Arsen Ostrovsky
This new academic year, as universities across America trumpeted their commitment to the pursuit of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI), for many Jewish students, this otherwise laudable goal has become entirely devoid of meaning, with the campus turning into a hotbed of antisemitism, Jew hatred and exclusion.
According to the ADL, in the last year, antisemitic incidents across the US reached record highs, with antisemitic activity reported on college and university campuses surging 41%.
Although these statistics should sadly not come as a surprise to anyone, what is staggering is the extent to which university administrators and leaders are willing to excuse and turn a blind eye to antisemitism, all in the name of the sacred pursuit of academic freedom and free speech.
When in January this year, on the eve of International Holocaust Remembrance Day, we called out the University of Michigan for refusing to condemn a group of students who called for an “intifada revolution,” the University justified their refusal to act by responding that “[o]ne of our most important values as an institution – one we teach and model in and out of the classroom and one that is embodied in our commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion – is the respect for those who have different opinions, have different life experiences, hold different world views.”
In this particular case, the “different world view” they were calling to respect was a direct and unadulterated call for violence, placing Jewish students, faculty and staff, in harm’s way.
In August last year, when a number of registered student groups at UC Berkeley Law School passed a by-law to exclude Zionist speakers, the University excused this by claiming Zionism was merely an expression of a “political viewpoint” and therefore protected speech under the First Amendment, not the inherent and indispensable part of Jewish identity that it is. In response, we filed a Title VI claim under the Civil Rights Act, on the basis of the University condoning the wholesale exclusion of a group of students, Jewish students in this case, on the basis of their identity, national original and shared ancestry.
And then most recently, last week, during Yom Kippur, the holiest day of the Jewish calendar, the Ivy League University of Pennsylvania hosted a ‘Palestine Writes’ literature event. Whilst a celebration of Palestinian literature and art ought to be embraced, this was mostly a festival of hate, featuring a who’s who of antisemites, extremists and even convicted terrorists.
One of the keynote speakers was Roger Waters, who has repeatedly engaged in antisemitism, including making such mendacious and racist claims about the “the Jewish lobby”. Waters is now being investigated by the German police, over engaging in Holocaust distortion, while wearing a mock-SS uniform during a recent series of concerts in the country. The US State Department has even said that Waters has “a long track record of using antisemitic tropes to denigrate Jewish people.”
Another speaker, Randa Abdel-Fattah, has previously claimed that “Israel is a demonic, sick project and I can’t way for the day we commemorate its end.”
Marc Lamont-Hill, also speaking at the festival, was fired by CNN after effectively calling for Israel’s destruction. He has also previously said that calls for Palestinians to “reject hatred and terrorism” were “offensive and counterproductive.”
Meanwhile, Susan Abulhawa, the executive director of the Palestine Writes festival, has previously expressed support for US-designated Palestinian terror groups Hamas, Islamic Jihad and PFLP, describing their terrorist actions, including those which have resulted in the murder of American citizens, as “self-defense by resistance groups,” while comparing Israel to Nazis and calling for a boycott of the Jewish state.
Although Penn President Liz Magill released a statement noting that some of the speakers at the event had a “troubling history of engaging in antisemitism by speaking and acting in ways that denigrate Jewish people,” Penn failed to take any meaningful steps in response, claiming they “fiercely support the free exchange of ideas as central to our educational mission.”
It is inconceivable that Penn would have permitted such a festival had it promoted, say, hatred against members of the African American or LGBTQ community, and rightfully so. Yet such hatred and incitement against Jewish students is being excused and whitewashed, while their voices are being marginalized, silenced and excluded, all in the name of free speech and a perverse interpretation of the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) policy.
Perhaps as recipients of federal funding, universities ought to be reminded of their obligations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, national origin and shared ancestry, or in circumstances where universities fail to take action against the creation of hostile environments on campus. This is a point that was also reinforced in the historic May 2023 White House Plan National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism.
Indeed, legislation has already been proposed in Congress to rescind federal funding from universities that allow antisemitism on campuses.
It is imperative to recognize that, even in circumstances where antisemitic hate speech in question is protected under the First Amendment, there is still an obligation for university leaders to condemn these attacks on Jewish students, support them and underscore that their concerns are real.
In order to guide the universities to determine the kind of speech and actions that qualify as antisemitism, universities ought to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) Working Definition of Antisemitism, the most widely endorsed definition of antisemitism in the world.
If universities truly want to pursue DEI, it is time Jewish students were included in this discussion and academic freedom no longer used as an excuse for Jew hatred.
Arsen Ostrovsky is a human rights attorney and CEO of the International Legal Forum, an independent NGO and global network of lawyers committed to combating antisemitism. You can also follow him on Twitter (‘X’) at: @Ostrov_A.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Mayoral Election Preview: Mayor Karen Bass vs. Councilmember Nithya Raman
Voting Down Party Lines This Midterm Election Will Hurt Jews
The Missing Years
Silence of the Jews: How Antizionist Mobs on College Campuses Are Assaulting the Freedom of Jewish Students to Disagree with Them
A Rose by Any Other Name Is Probably Jewish
Whatever Happens, We’re Here to Stay
Will Israel’s Critics Repent?
There is a special need for the critics of Israel to repent for their false charges against Israel of starving Gazans.
Who Is Your Provider?
When TV was free, somehow there was always something to watch. It was a very Norman Rockwell experience. The whole family would gather in the living room. The dog was asleep on the woven rug.
Obama’s Turn on Israel
The fact that he thinks such a once-radical message will be accepted by the American people speaks volumes as to the challenges that the winner of next week’s Israeli elections will face in the court of American public opinion.
Obama Got a Doctorate in Belfast and Failed the Local History Lesson
Northern Ireland learned at a terrible price that political agreements alone cannot secure lasting peace while armed terrorist groups remain committed to violence.
El-Sayed’s Muslim Motherhood
A new damning disclosure may finally be too much for even diehard Democrats to overlook.
Melissa B. Greenberg Joins Americans for Ben-Gurion University as New CEO
Greenberg is a veteran nonprofit fundraiser for Jewish organizations with ample experience in higher education as well.
Did You Hear About the Violent Jews Rioting Through France?
Of course not. A scene of angry French Jews burning down government buildings is as likely as a UFO sighting.
Three More Southern California Journalism Awards! Celebrating Stories from Antarctica, Ireland, and Inspiring Voices
Two Hundred and Five Years – A poem for Parsha Noach
I would make the best of two hundred and five years.
Pico-Robertson Neighborhood Cleanup 2026 Recap
“I Love Life”: Paralyzed for Nearly Two Years, Dennis Prager Talks Gratitude and Happiness at Miami Gala
Having a brain and a voice that are intact means he can continue doing what he loves most: sharing his ideas with the world.
Memorial at Saban, Soraka Medical Center Mark Three Years Since Oct. 7; ‘Fauda’ Panel
Notable people and events in the Jewish LA community.
Vegetarianism and Impossible Utopias
One must remember that the pursuit of impossible utopias often ends up creating dystopias.
A Bisl Torah — Bar Mitzvah Lessons
Many reflect about children’s additional responsibilities as they take on their new title.
A Moment in Time: October 7 – Beyond Black and White
Thorns and Thistles and Two Trees in the Garden of Eden
Print Issue: Making Jewish Fiction New Again | October 16, 2026
In a climate of anti-Jewish censorship, a new fiction imprint from Wicked Son will play a part in determining the future of Jewish fiction in America.
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi Taff and Aliyah
First of two parts
Michael Douglas Memoir, ‘One Helluva Ride,’ Is a Helluva Read
At 82, Douglas has survived cancer, is married to the love of his life, Catherine Zeta-Jones, has been in iconic films including “Wall Street” and “Basic Instinct” and grew up with the pressure of having a famous father, the legendary actor Kirk Douglas.
A Burst of Inspirational Art in Hadassah
What makes them special, in addition to their ethereal beauty, is that four of the paintings are of women; two others, while abstract, appear to reference the female.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.