Likud voters still hope that a new government–the government that does not include their party and their leaders–will not become a reality. In a poll published on Monday, about a third of them believed that the “change government” isn’t going to form, and another third told the pollsters that the new government is going to collapse before the end of 2021. Among the other sectors of the public, and among most Likud officials, there is growing realization that a new government is likely to form very soon. Next Monday is the latest possible postponement.
Yesterday, some of the coalition agreements were published. They make the new government seem very real. Reading these agreements is much like watching mating hedgehogs. Everything is so delicate as not to offend anyone, as not to make anyone uneasy. This leads to a formulation that includes many platitudes, and few details. And yet, some things we already know: for example, that this will be a government with many ministers, and not the economic government of 18 ministers promoted and promised by Yesh Atid’s Yair Lapid.
Reading these agreements is much like watching mating hedgehogs. Everything is so delicate as not to offend anyone, as not to make anyone uneasy.
Lapid already admitted that this is a serious flaw. He had to compromise, or the government wouldn’t be possible. Like him, Yamina’s Naftali Bennett compromised: he vowed not to sit with Meretz, and still does. Meretz, for its part, is sitting in a coalition that has no intention to focus on making peace with the Palestinians (although a perfunctory sentence about peace is included in the document). Labor sits in a coalition controlled by capitalists. Blue and White leader, Benny Gantz, sits in a government in which he will not be the Prime Minister, even though he has more seats than Bennett. Ayelet Shaked had to accept that she will not be the Justice Minister.
The agreements between the parties are a recipe for doing as little as possible, except when everyone agrees. State-religious changes will only be made if all the parties agree to make them. If not, then the status quo is king. Labor’s demand for public transportation on shabbat will materialize only with the consent of right-religious Yamina. The Kotel compromise might have a chance, as all parties seem to accept it (and it’s also a good way to show the Haredi parties that they lose by being so loyal to Netanyahu).
And so on and so forth.
The compromises are many, and achievement is one: ousting Benjamin Netanyahu. That is the main aim of this government, and if you think this is somewhat petty, you are not alone. Many Israelis, mostly on the right, feel like you. But most Israelis feel that it is worth it—that forming this coalition of rivals to oust Netanyahu was an essential move.
You could say that the main debate between these two groups is about the importance of personality in politics. Some Israelis, mostly on the right, understand that the PM has a controversial, maybe even problematic, personality. But they deem it unimportant compared to the other things at hand. They believe that if the PM is vindictive, or cheap, or conniving, it’s not necessarily commendable but also not very important. What’s important is whether the PM governs well—the blitz of vaccines, the persistence against Iran, the stature of a world leader.
You could say that the main debate between these two groups is about the importance of personality in politics.
In the other camp, there is a lot of personal animosity, some of which is juvenile, but there is also a measured argument that goes like this: at some point, when personal flaws seem uncontrolled, they affect the ability of the PM to govern in a useful way. Future ministers like Gideon Saar and Avigdor Lieberman believe that Netanyahu is dangerous to the country because he can no longer see the difference between his own interests and the country’s.
If Netanyahu is a merely annoying yet great leader, you’d be right to wonder about the strange quilt of many colors that was arranged as a replacement. But if Netanyahu is dangerous to the future of the country, you’d cover it with the closest available blanket, even a colorful quilt, to keep it warm.
Shmuel Rosner is an Israeli columnist, editor, and researcher. He is the editor of the research and data-journalism website themadad.com and is the political editor of the Jewish Journal.
We Agree to Disagree (Except on Ditching Netanyahu)
Shmuel Rosner
Likud voters still hope that a new government–the government that does not include their party and their leaders–will not become a reality. In a poll published on Monday, about a third of them believed that the “change government” isn’t going to form, and another third told the pollsters that the new government is going to collapse before the end of 2021. Among the other sectors of the public, and among most Likud officials, there is growing realization that a new government is likely to form very soon. Next Monday is the latest possible postponement.
Yesterday, some of the coalition agreements were published. They make the new government seem very real. Reading these agreements is much like watching mating hedgehogs. Everything is so delicate as not to offend anyone, as not to make anyone uneasy. This leads to a formulation that includes many platitudes, and few details. And yet, some things we already know: for example, that this will be a government with many ministers, and not the economic government of 18 ministers promoted and promised by Yesh Atid’s Yair Lapid.
Lapid already admitted that this is a serious flaw. He had to compromise, or the government wouldn’t be possible. Like him, Yamina’s Naftali Bennett compromised: he vowed not to sit with Meretz, and still does. Meretz, for its part, is sitting in a coalition that has no intention to focus on making peace with the Palestinians (although a perfunctory sentence about peace is included in the document). Labor sits in a coalition controlled by capitalists. Blue and White leader, Benny Gantz, sits in a government in which he will not be the Prime Minister, even though he has more seats than Bennett. Ayelet Shaked had to accept that she will not be the Justice Minister.
The agreements between the parties are a recipe for doing as little as possible, except when everyone agrees. State-religious changes will only be made if all the parties agree to make them. If not, then the status quo is king. Labor’s demand for public transportation on shabbat will materialize only with the consent of right-religious Yamina. The Kotel compromise might have a chance, as all parties seem to accept it (and it’s also a good way to show the Haredi parties that they lose by being so loyal to Netanyahu).
And so on and so forth.
The compromises are many, and achievement is one: ousting Benjamin Netanyahu. That is the main aim of this government, and if you think this is somewhat petty, you are not alone. Many Israelis, mostly on the right, feel like you. But most Israelis feel that it is worth it—that forming this coalition of rivals to oust Netanyahu was an essential move.
You could say that the main debate between these two groups is about the importance of personality in politics. Some Israelis, mostly on the right, understand that the PM has a controversial, maybe even problematic, personality. But they deem it unimportant compared to the other things at hand. They believe that if the PM is vindictive, or cheap, or conniving, it’s not necessarily commendable but also not very important. What’s important is whether the PM governs well—the blitz of vaccines, the persistence against Iran, the stature of a world leader.
In the other camp, there is a lot of personal animosity, some of which is juvenile, but there is also a measured argument that goes like this: at some point, when personal flaws seem uncontrolled, they affect the ability of the PM to govern in a useful way. Future ministers like Gideon Saar and Avigdor Lieberman believe that Netanyahu is dangerous to the country because he can no longer see the difference between his own interests and the country’s.
If Netanyahu is a merely annoying yet great leader, you’d be right to wonder about the strange quilt of many colors that was arranged as a replacement. But if Netanyahu is dangerous to the future of the country, you’d cover it with the closest available blanket, even a colorful quilt, to keep it warm.
Shmuel Rosner is an Israeli columnist, editor, and researcher. He is the editor of the research and data-journalism website themadad.com and is the political editor of the Jewish Journal.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
John Ondrasik, Jonah Platt Highlight AJC, ADL Press Briefing at UCLA Hillel
Shabbat Prayer for Our College Students and Ourselves
1,400 Yizkors
Being Good is Easier to Resist than Sweezy vs New Hampshire
A Bisl Torah – Souls Connected
All the Fish in the Sea – A poem for Parsha Acharei Mot
Culture
Welcome Back, Carbs!
A Perfect Pair of Confits
‘The Enemy Beside Me’: Can the Truth of Lithuania Holocaust History Be Told in Lithuania to Lithuanians and By Lithuanians?
A History of a Pivotal Era in Palestine Wins a Top Jewish Book Prize
State Legislator Demands Federal Probe into UCLA’s Failure to Protect Pupils
Assembly member Rick Chavez Zbur said UCLA’s inaction “likely violate” Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Chancellor Block Addresses Pro-Palestinian Encampment Removal: “It Needed to Come to an End”
Block said the encampment “became a focal point for serious violence.”
Police Clear Pro-Palestinian Encampment at UCLA
More than 200 protesters were arrested during the late night raid.
The Assault: A Coordinated Attack on America’s Jews and Israel
American Jews are awakening to a new political reality concerning our changing status and position in the United States.
We Need Tactical Training to Combat Campus Antisemitism
We need on-the-ground tactical training for Jewish student activists and leaders if the Jewish community is going to push back against this madness and protect college students.
Hollywood
Spielberg Says Antisemitism Is “No Longer Lurking, But Standing Proud” Like 1930s Germany
Young Actress Juju Brener on Her “Hocus Pocus 2” Role
Behind the Scenes of “Jeopardy!” with Mayim Bialik
Podcasts
Chico Menashe: Asif: Culinary Institute of Israel, Cooking with Chutzpah and The Open Kitchen Project
Beth Lee: OMG Yummy, Exciting Flavors and Preserved Lemons
More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.