October 8, 2007 | 12:26 pm
It seems clear religion has become too much of a campaign trail issue this presidential season. Yesterday, Jon Meachem, writing in The New York Times, took John McCain to task for pandering to the U.S.-is-a-Christian-nation crowd.
Thomas Jefferson said that his bill for religious liberty in Virginia was âmeant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and the Mahometan, the Hindu, and infidel of every denomination.â When George Washington was inaugurated in New York in April 1789, Gershom Seixas, the hazan of Shearith Israel, was listed among the cityâs clergymen (there were 14 in New York at the time) â a sign of acceptance and respect. The next year, Washington wrote the Hebrew Congregation of Newport, R.I., saying, âhappily the government of the United States ... gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance. ... Everyone shall sit in safety under his own vine and fig tree, and there shall be none to make him afraid.â
Andrew Jackson resisted bids in the 1820s to form a âChristian party in politics.â Abraham Lincoln buried a proposed âChristian amendmentâ to the Constitution to declare the nationâs fealty to Jesus. Theodore Roosevelt defended William Howard Taft, a Unitarian, from religious attacks by supporters of William Jennings Bryan.
The founders were not anti-religion. Many of them were faithful in their personal lives, and in their public language they evoked God. They grounded the founding principle of the nation â that all men are created equal â in the divine. But they wanted faith to be one thread in the countryâs tapestry, not the whole tapestry.
I’ve got to say I agree, much to the delight, I’m sure, of some of my more godless readers. Christians often spend too much time trying to shape the American government so it fulfills the role of the church instead of just being the church themselves. History has already taught us the calamity of divinely-appointed and -inspired rulers. If we put too much credence in the faith of politicians, then truly we are believing in the absurd.
Posted by Brad A. Greenberg in God for President | 2 Comments — Leave your comment
We welcome your feedback.
Your information will not be shared or sold without your consent. Get all the details.
academia america american jews anti-semitism atheism barack obama books capitalism catholicism christianity crime death entertainment europe evangelicals family god holidays holocaust iran iraq islam israel jesus jihad john mccain judaism los angeles media middle east personal politics president 08 president bush president 08 satire science sexuality sports the law
Advertisement
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
God's Blog
God for President
Book Bits
Caption Contest
Jewish genius
Strange science
Who is a Jew?
World of Worship
Advertisements
With talk of a new Cold War in the offing following Russia's recent military successes in Georgia, Israel is worried Russia might reassess this policy and use the sale of new weaponry to Syria -- or the threat of it -- to strengthen Russia's hand vis-à-vis Israel's primary
I can vividly remember the first time I visited the Museum of Tolerance, in seventh grade. Not personally knowing anyone who had survived the Holocaust, I had been shielded from the grisly details of World War II.
Parshat Shoftim (Deuteronomy 16:18-21:9) One of the biggest misnomers in the Jewish vocabulary is the translation of tzedakah as "charity." This mistranslation has gone on for so long in the American Jewish community that it's a hard habit to break.
Since 1978, Iranian Jews have injected into a stable, maybe even staid Jewish community talent, industry, a profound connection to their Jewish roots and a desire to have a positive political and social impact on the city. They have energized a Jewish community that could always
Brad:
Your post is interesting, and I agree with both your opinion statement and your conclusion. You fail to mention, though—and I think you should—that while the Declaration of Independence contains references to a markedly Deistic version of a creator god, the Constitution has no mention of any gods whatsoever. This was intentional on the founders’ part. They didn’t want their government to be construed in any way as being affiliated with religion.
We know you’re one of the good guys, Brad.