“He finished speaking with him on Mount Sinai.”
With these words, the riverlike stream of prophecy, which has coursed through the past two and half Torah portions, ceases flowing. Suddenly, we are jolted back into reality.
The Torah’s next words further intensify this sense of coming to. “The people saw that Moses was late in coming down from the mountain.” Restored to our senses, we are forced to confront the fact that while we have been swept up in the divine word, we have in fact been standing here on the craggy peak of Mount Sinai the whole time, with the people of Israel below us, unremembered and unremarked by the text.
During Moses’ time on the mountain, the Israelites assumed his absence meant that he had abandoned them. Among child psychologists, this would be called an anxious, rather than a secure, attachment style. The securely attached child will cry when their caregiver departs, but will soon calm down, confident that their caregiver will, in time, return. The anxiously attached child has no such confidence in the future. Every departure is experienced as the last.
It is this anxious attachment that leads the Israelites into the sin of idolatry. The story of the golden calf is well-known and hardly needs to be recounted. Its images — the debauched bacchanal of the Israelites around their golden god and Moses shattering the tablets on the ground in anger — are burned in our memory as eternal symbols of transgression and its consequences.
What is perhaps less familiar is the aftermath of this affair, a narrative whose images are subtler but no less powerful. The second half of the parashah is about estrangement and the ways in which God, Moses and the Israelites haltingly find their way back to one another. Where previously we had lost our sense of space and time in the act of revelation, now we are hyperaware of both. Distance and duration are central to this reconciliation narrative.
Distance and duration are central to this reconciliation narrative.
“Whenever Moses went out to the Tent of Meeting, all the people would rise and stand, each at the entrance of his tent, and gaze after Moses until he had entered the Tent.” In this sweet and melancholy image, the anxiously attached Israelites stare at the figure of Moses from a distance, too terrified by the prospect of his disappearance to let him out of their sight.
Moses, meanwhile, is unready to forgive the Israelites himself. This doesn’t mean he has forgotten them. He works tirelessly to secure their forgiveness from God. When God assents, Moses is enraptured and exclaims: “Oh, let me behold Your Presence!”
But no human can see God’s face and live. God therefore devises a way to be both seen and not seen, like a silhouette through a screen. He tells Moses to position himself in the cleft of a boulder. “I will shield you with My hand until I have passed by. Then I will take My hand away and you will see My back; but My face must not be seen.”
More than a golden calf or shattered tablets, it is a turned back that is the main image of Parashat Ki Tisa. Looking down from the mountain, God sees that the Israelites have turned their backs to Him. Looking out from their tents, the Israelites watch Moses’s back as he walks to the Tent of Meeting. And now, tucked into this crevice of stone, Moses sees God’s back as He passes.
As with an infant watching its mother when she leaves the room, all of this back-gazing is a training session in secure attachment. The Israelites are learning what it means to be a people with a God — to trust that He is mindful of them even when He can’t be seen. God, for His part, is learning what it means to be a God with a people, bound to forever turn back, no matter how many times He looks away.
Matthew Schultz is the author of the essay collection “What Came Before” (2020). He is a rabbinical student at Hebrew College in Newton, Massachusetts.
Unscrolled, Ki Tisa: When the Jews and God Turned Back
Matthew Schultz
“He finished speaking with him on Mount Sinai.”
With these words, the riverlike stream of prophecy, which has coursed through the past two and half Torah portions, ceases flowing. Suddenly, we are jolted back into reality.
The Torah’s next words further intensify this sense of coming to. “The people saw that Moses was late in coming down from the mountain.” Restored to our senses, we are forced to confront the fact that while we have been swept up in the divine word, we have in fact been standing here on the craggy peak of Mount Sinai the whole time, with the people of Israel below us, unremembered and unremarked by the text.
During Moses’ time on the mountain, the Israelites assumed his absence meant that he had abandoned them. Among child psychologists, this would be called an anxious, rather than a secure, attachment style. The securely attached child will cry when their caregiver departs, but will soon calm down, confident that their caregiver will, in time, return. The anxiously attached child has no such confidence in the future. Every departure is experienced as the last.
It is this anxious attachment that leads the Israelites into the sin of idolatry. The story of the golden calf is well-known and hardly needs to be recounted. Its images — the debauched bacchanal of the Israelites around their golden god and Moses shattering the tablets on the ground in anger — are burned in our memory as eternal symbols of transgression and its consequences.
What is perhaps less familiar is the aftermath of this affair, a narrative whose images are subtler but no less powerful. The second half of the parashah is about estrangement and the ways in which God, Moses and the Israelites haltingly find their way back to one another. Where previously we had lost our sense of space and time in the act of revelation, now we are hyperaware of both. Distance and duration are central to this reconciliation narrative.
“Whenever Moses went out to the Tent of Meeting, all the people would rise and stand, each at the entrance of his tent, and gaze after Moses until he had entered the Tent.” In this sweet and melancholy image, the anxiously attached Israelites stare at the figure of Moses from a distance, too terrified by the prospect of his disappearance to let him out of their sight.
Moses, meanwhile, is unready to forgive the Israelites himself. This doesn’t mean he has forgotten them. He works tirelessly to secure their forgiveness from God. When God assents, Moses is enraptured and exclaims: “Oh, let me behold Your Presence!”
But no human can see God’s face and live. God therefore devises a way to be both seen and not seen, like a silhouette through a screen. He tells Moses to position himself in the cleft of a boulder. “I will shield you with My hand until I have passed by. Then I will take My hand away and you will see My back; but My face must not be seen.”
More than a golden calf or shattered tablets, it is a turned back that is the main image of Parashat Ki Tisa. Looking down from the mountain, God sees that the Israelites have turned their backs to Him. Looking out from their tents, the Israelites watch Moses’s back as he walks to the Tent of Meeting. And now, tucked into this crevice of stone, Moses sees God’s back as He passes.
As with an infant watching its mother when she leaves the room, all of this back-gazing is a training session in secure attachment. The Israelites are learning what it means to be a people with a God — to trust that He is mindful of them even when He can’t be seen. God, for His part, is learning what it means to be a God with a people, bound to forever turn back, no matter how many times He looks away.
Matthew Schultz is the author of the essay collection “What Came Before” (2020). He is a rabbinical student at Hebrew College in Newton, Massachusetts.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
UC Davis Dissolves Law Student Association After It Proposed a BDS Resolution
Smokey Presence – A poem for Parsha Pekudei
USHMM Tribute Dinner, Hamakom Names Full-Time Cantor, Spec Labs Concert
On the Huckabee Nomination
A Bisl Torah~Waiting Versus Walking
Eylon Levy: The Lone Israeli Soldier in the Israel-Hamas 2023 Misinformation War
Culture
Brad Meltzer’s Magic Trick: Turning a Graduation Speech into a Book on Empathy, Kindness and Transformation
Full of Love— (Gluten-free) Cakes
Coach of #1 College Basketball Team in Nation Standing Up for Israel
Stone Temples & Tiny Explorers: A Family’s Magical Machu Picchu Odyssey
A Moment in Time: “The BIG Picture”
Strength and Solidarity at 35th Chabad-Lubavitch Women’s Conference
The international conference brings together shluchas from all over the world; shlucha refers to a female emissary sent to a community to promote Jewish education and outreach).
Samuel Beckett Wanted No Trilogy Like the Quintilogy of the Torah
Sean Kanan: Bad Boy Hot Sauce, Gratitude and Pasta
Taste Buds with Deb – Episode 100
Sephardic Torah from the Holy Land | A Bat Mitzvah of Sephardic Continuity
This was a Bat Mitzvah for the present, and for our future.
Hollywood
Spielberg Says Antisemitism Is “No Longer Lurking, But Standing Proud” Like 1930s Germany
Young Actress Juju Brener on Her “Hocus Pocus 2” Role
Behind the Scenes of “Jeopardy!” with Mayim Bialik
Podcasts
Sean Kanan: Bad Boy Hot Sauce, Gratitude and Pasta
“You Want to Enjoy the Mundane” ft. Ami Kozak
More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.