In cultures steeped in the spiritual influence of Taoism, a master work of art is one which expresses impermanence and emptiness. Its prized forms are simple and naturalistic — the uncarved block (pu) and the swath of unbleached silk (su). In the words of scholar Alan Watts, the Taoist aesthetic reminds us that “everything is change, and nothing at all can be held onto or possessed.”
If we can borrow this set of principles and transpose it across geography and time, we find it perhaps fitting to describe the aesthetic and spiritual ethic of the Israelites’ sojourn in the Sinai wilderness, a place of shifting sands and stark natural beauty.
In Parashat Yitro, the Israelites are transient wanderers in the liminal space of the desert. As they ready themselves to receive the Torah, God instructs Moses to make a firm boundary around the base of Mount Sinai, which the Israelites are not to cross. “Whoever touches the mountain,” God warns, “shall be put to death.”
It is a firm prohibition, repeated twice for emphasis, but it is nonetheless provisional, in force only within a limited window of time. “When the ram’s horn sounds a long blast, then they may go up on the mountain.”
This sunset clause is a curious elaboration, marking the holiness of the mountain as a fleeting condition of becoming rather than an eternal state of being. Lifted momentarily into a holy relationship with God and the people of Israel, Mount Sinai is destined to revert to an unmarked feature of the vast wilderness.
This is a stark contrast to the treatment of the Jewish people’s other sacred mountain: Mount Moriah in Jerusalem, where the Holy Temple once stood. Unlike Sinai, the holiness of Mount Moriah has no expiration date. As such, the prohibition against ascending to the site of the former Temple remains intact to this day.
But such deification of place and trust in eternity would be unbecoming in the wilderness, where the lives of an entire generation of wanderers will soon pass into death like sand through an hourglass.
When the people are gathered about the base of the mountain, God speaks His ten utterances. “You shall not make for yourself a sculpted image, or any likeness of what is in the heavens above, or on earth below… you shall not make any gods of silver, nor shall you make for yourselves any gods of gold.”
In forbidding sculpted images, God articulates a vision of the divine that cannot be bound up and kept but must rather be apprehended like music — lived like life itself.
In forbidding sculpted images, God articulates a vision of the divine that cannot be bound up and kept.
In hearing these commandments, we can begin to understand why God has refrained from dedicating Sinai as an eternal monument. To do otherwise would have been to plasticize the revelatory event — to make it into an idol.
After the ten utterances are spoken, the parasha comes to a close with the image of a humble earth altar: “If you make for Me an altar,” God commands, “do not build it of hewn stones; for by wielding your tool upon them you have profaned them.”
At first listen, this commandment seems to be a rebuke of violence. As Rashi writes, “The altar makes peace between Israel and their Father in Heaven, and therefore there should not come upon it anything that cuts and destroys.” But we can also hear in this commandment a critique of the Temple that God’s children will someday build for Him on that other sacred mountain in Jerusalem, which will be a place of hewn stone and pounded gold. It would seem from Parashat Yitro that God prefers the uncarved block of Taoism.
Indeed, Mount Sinai is itself an uncarved block – beautiful in its imperfection, holy in its ephemerality. It is a temporary abode but no less sacred for being so. That its location has been lost to time only serves to remind us the important truth that “nothing at all can be held onto or possessed.”
Matthew Schultz is the author of the essay collection “What Came Before” (2020). He is a rabbinical student at Hebrew College in Newton, Massachusetts.
Unscrolled: A Rabbinical Student’s Take on Parashat Yitro
Matthew Schultz
In cultures steeped in the spiritual influence of Taoism, a master work of art is one which expresses impermanence and emptiness. Its prized forms are simple and naturalistic — the uncarved block (pu) and the swath of unbleached silk (su). In the words of scholar Alan Watts, the Taoist aesthetic reminds us that “everything is change, and nothing at all can be held onto or possessed.”
If we can borrow this set of principles and transpose it across geography and time, we find it perhaps fitting to describe the aesthetic and spiritual ethic of the Israelites’ sojourn in the Sinai wilderness, a place of shifting sands and stark natural beauty.
In Parashat Yitro, the Israelites are transient wanderers in the liminal space of the desert. As they ready themselves to receive the Torah, God instructs Moses to make a firm boundary around the base of Mount Sinai, which the Israelites are not to cross. “Whoever touches the mountain,” God warns, “shall be put to death.”
It is a firm prohibition, repeated twice for emphasis, but it is nonetheless provisional, in force only within a limited window of time. “When the ram’s horn sounds a long blast, then they may go up on the mountain.”
This sunset clause is a curious elaboration, marking the holiness of the mountain as a fleeting condition of becoming rather than an eternal state of being. Lifted momentarily into a holy relationship with God and the people of Israel, Mount Sinai is destined to revert to an unmarked feature of the vast wilderness.
This is a stark contrast to the treatment of the Jewish people’s other sacred mountain: Mount Moriah in Jerusalem, where the Holy Temple once stood. Unlike Sinai, the holiness of Mount Moriah has no expiration date. As such, the prohibition against ascending to the site of the former Temple remains intact to this day.
But such deification of place and trust in eternity would be unbecoming in the wilderness, where the lives of an entire generation of wanderers will soon pass into death like sand through an hourglass.
When the people are gathered about the base of the mountain, God speaks His ten utterances. “You shall not make for yourself a sculpted image, or any likeness of what is in the heavens above, or on earth below… you shall not make any gods of silver, nor shall you make for yourselves any gods of gold.”
In forbidding sculpted images, God articulates a vision of the divine that cannot be bound up and kept but must rather be apprehended like music — lived like life itself.
In hearing these commandments, we can begin to understand why God has refrained from dedicating Sinai as an eternal monument. To do otherwise would have been to plasticize the revelatory event — to make it into an idol.
After the ten utterances are spoken, the parasha comes to a close with the image of a humble earth altar: “If you make for Me an altar,” God commands, “do not build it of hewn stones; for by wielding your tool upon them you have profaned them.”
At first listen, this commandment seems to be a rebuke of violence. As Rashi writes, “The altar makes peace between Israel and their Father in Heaven, and therefore there should not come upon it anything that cuts and destroys.” But we can also hear in this commandment a critique of the Temple that God’s children will someday build for Him on that other sacred mountain in Jerusalem, which will be a place of hewn stone and pounded gold. It would seem from Parashat Yitro that God prefers the uncarved block of Taoism.
Indeed, Mount Sinai is itself an uncarved block – beautiful in its imperfection, holy in its ephemerality. It is a temporary abode but no less sacred for being so. That its location has been lost to time only serves to remind us the important truth that “nothing at all can be held onto or possessed.”
Matthew Schultz is the author of the essay collection “What Came Before” (2020). He is a rabbinical student at Hebrew College in Newton, Massachusetts.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Mark Ruffalo Once Admitted the ‘Genocide’ Libel Fuels Antisemitism. Now He’s Doing It Again?
Some of My Best Friends Are Jewish: Mark Ruffalo and the Anatomy of a Modern Blood Libel
The Dark Side of DEI
Israel Derangement Syndrome Hits Montreal City Council
Creative Community for Peace Calls Mark Ruffalo’s Ellison Attack Antisemitic, Urges Hollywood to Stop Platforming Him
In Accusing Ellison of Complicity in ‘Genocide,’ Mark Ruffalo Echoes Ancient Tropes of Jewish Control
The Death of the Bucket List: Discovering the Art of Slow Travel in Portugal.
When You Go Out To War — A poem for Parsha Ki Teitzei
When you go out to war, be nice.
“Jerusalemites”
Chosen Links by Boaz spotlight
Did Josephus See Jesus as a Rebellious Son?
A Moment in Time: Looking Back, Moving Forward
A Bisl Torah — Repairs Reopen
Wounds reopen; repair is sometimes never really over.
Print Issue: The Silent Boycott | August 21, 2026
How Israeli academics are being shut out of the international academic world, and how UCLA professor Judea Pearl is fighting back.
Jacob and Esau Clash on the Cross Bronx Expressway in New Book
The novel is set in 1952 and centers on Jay deVenezia, a 23-year-old, six-foot-five-inch Italian Jew from the Bronx, and his older brother, Eric “Bud” deVenezia.
Israeli Rom-Com ‘Bloody Murray’ Balances Life and Art
“Bloody Murray,” whose first season is available on ChaiFlicks, stars Naomi Levov as Mo, better known as Murray, and Rotem Sela as her best friend and roommate, Dana.
Elon Gold’s ‘The Wedding Entertainer’ Up for Best Film at 2026 Ophir Awards
In addition to Best Feature Film, “The Wedding Entertainer” received nominations for Best Actor for Rand, Best Supporting Actor for Tal Friedman, Best Supporting Actress for Malky Goldman, Best Screenplay for Rand and Best Cinematography for Giora Bejach.
The Bad Data Behind the ‘Genocide’ Charge
Everyone has a direct stake in knowing that one of the most-cited evidentiary pillars in the international campaign against Israel is far shakier than its footnotes suggest.
In This Season: Renewing Our L.A. Jewish Community
In this, the season of our renewal, I am proposing a transformational agenda for our Los Angeles Jewish community.
There’s a Leek in the Bureka
Deliciously flaky and crispy with a satisfying creamy filling, these burekas are really easy to prepare.
Table for Five: Ki Teitzei
A Lost Sheep
The Silent Boycott
How Israeli Academics Are Being Shut Out of the International Academic World
Hit the Pause Button
The pause isn’t the absence of action; it’s a sanctuary in time.
Rosner’s Domain | The Repressed Question of Judea and Samaria
It is a challenge for which various solutions have already been tried and failed. Most of all, it is a challenge that doesn’t seem to have any prospect of being addressed anytime soon in a way that leads to a final resolution.
Presidents Have Always Lied — When Threatened by Assassins
Presidential security machinations, like presidential vacation time and decorating budgets, often serve as partisan Rorschach tests: rivals mock, while supporters defend.
Why I’m No Longer a Democrat
It is about refusing to allow partisan loyalty to make us silent when our own community is threatened.
Why I’m Staying in the Democratic Party
Nowhere is it written you have to agree with every position taken by every candidate running as a member of your party.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.