Let’s get a few things out of the way: I am a nonobservant Jew; calling me secular might be putting too fine a point on it. I was brought up in a Reform temple in Forest Hills, Queens. Very Reform. It was one of those early 1950s temple buildings, done up in blonde wood and recessed lighting, decor a friend of mine referred to as “upscale Chinese restaurant.” We had an organ, stained glass windows, a rabbi in a business suit and tallis. To be blunt, we were probably one messiah away from being Episcopalian. And it’s not like my parents were observant; my father was the kind of Jew who’d complain that a grocery store in our neighborhood was open on Yom Kippur … as he drove past it on his way to lunch.
So it’s reasonably safe to say that everyone reading this knows more about Judaism than me. But I do know a thing or two about politics. If my parents were lax in religion, politics was a different story. I grew up in a home where voting Democratic was the 11th Commandment. The biggest fight I ever saw my parents get into was because my mother had voted for 1965 GOP mayoral candidate John Lindsay. “You only voted for him because he was handsome,” was the gist of my father’s argument. After college, I ended up working in politics, first for a political consultant, then on former GOP Representative John B. Anderson’s abortive attempt to form a third party in 1984. (I decided to leave politics after that campaign; the whole business just felt dirty and underhanded. I decided to make my living writing about the music industry. I thought it would be less venal. Like Rick, when he tells Capt. Reynaud that he came to Casablanca for the waters, “I was misinformed.”)
My experience (and movie references) may be rooted in the 20th century, but I do know one political truth that remains in force today: You can’t change anyone’s mind if you’re not in the room. So it disturbs me when I hear Jews exhorting other Jews to abandon the Democratic Party.
And let’s table any discussion about Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Ahmad El-Sayad and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and any of the Democratic Socialists running on the Democratic line. Call them progressive, socialist, woke, antisemitic or antizionist, they’re currently a small minority of the party and thankfully, I don’t have to vote for them. If you don’t like the direction they’re taking the party, the only way to stop it is to provide a viable alternative. But if you leave, you allow them to set the terms of the debate. The way to push them out of the spotlight isn’t to throw up your hands, cry it’s unfair and take your bat and ball home. You need to get in the trenches, and convince enough people that your cause is righteous and to get behind a candidate or legislation more to your liking. Even in the age of Zoom meetings and Trump’s bread and circus rallies, politics remains a retail business; you make your gains on a person-by-person basis.
And you’ll never change anyone’s mind by shaming them (although you could argue that American politics has entered its “no shame” era). If anyone starts yelling about my perceived shortcomings, my back immediately stiffens and I’ll yell back, even louder, that they are wrong … even if I know they’re right. In an age where no grievance goes unspoken, I’m guessing I’m not the only one who feels this way. If you’ve read Robert Caro’s now-five-volume life of Lyndon Johnson, you know that the real work of politics – the arm twisting and horse trading that used to grease legislation to passage – was done away from the cameras, in the cloakroom.
There are probably some of you who can remember when Democrats and Republicans not only worked on legislation together, but were friends away from the Capitol. Democratic Speaker of the House Tip O’Neill was known to regularly share a civilized beverage with Republican President Ronald Reagan. It’s probably harder to achieve this level of comity at a time where “transparency” has become a war cry and on-line influencers are ready to pounce on anyone who veers even slightly from partisan dogma. (It would probably also be easier if the person currently occupying the Oval Office wasn’t a toxic narcissist with an understanding of the Constitution picked up by from watching “Schoolhouse Rock’s” “I’m Just a Bill.”)
People used to talk about political parties being a “big tent,” and mean it as a compliment. Nowhere is it written you have to agree with every position taken by every candidate running as a member of your party. There used to be a time where there were conservative Democrats like the “boll weevils” of the 1980s, who often voted with the GOP, and liberal Republicans like New York Governor Nelson Rockefeller and Senator Jacob Javits. Today, unless you check all the boxes, you immediately become part of the enemy. Now it’s who can bring out the base, usually by scaring them about “the other.” It was only 18 years ago that the GOP Presidential candidate, Arizona Senator John McCain, who at one point wanted to nominate Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman as his vice president, told a supporter who was “scared” of the Arab Democrat Barack Obama becoming president: “Sen. Obama is a decent person and a person you don’t have to be scared of as president of the United States.” The current president, when not measuring himself for another statue, calls Democrats “radical lunatics” who “hate America.”
You might never come to an agreement with El-Sayed or Mamdani or AOC and “the Squad” about Israel and Palestine (and given that no one has come up with a solution in thousands of years, it’s pretty arrogant to think we can do it in months), but you might agree on the need to pass “Medicare for all.” As the late Ed Koch used to say, “If you agree with me on nine out of 12 issues, vote for me. If you agree with me on 12 out of 12 issues, see a psychiatrist.”
Now, if someone decided to form a party that takes good ideas from both sides of the aisle and is competent enough to create policy using those ideas, I’m certainly willing to consider it. But until then, I’m keeping my party identification Democratic. If nothing else, I’m scared my late father, buried on the other side of the country, would rise from the grave and haunt me if I don’t.
Steven Mirkin is the Journal’s copy editor.
Why I’m Staying in the Democratic Party
Steven Mirkin
Let’s get a few things out of the way: I am a nonobservant Jew; calling me secular might be putting too fine a point on it. I was brought up in a Reform temple in Forest Hills, Queens. Very Reform. It was one of those early 1950s temple buildings, done up in blonde wood and recessed lighting, decor a friend of mine referred to as “upscale Chinese restaurant.” We had an organ, stained glass windows, a rabbi in a business suit and tallis. To be blunt, we were probably one messiah away from being Episcopalian. And it’s not like my parents were observant; my father was the kind of Jew who’d complain that a grocery store in our neighborhood was open on Yom Kippur … as he drove past it on his way to lunch.
So it’s reasonably safe to say that everyone reading this knows more about Judaism than me. But I do know a thing or two about politics. If my parents were lax in religion, politics was a different story. I grew up in a home where voting Democratic was the 11th Commandment. The biggest fight I ever saw my parents get into was because my mother had voted for 1965 GOP mayoral candidate John Lindsay. “You only voted for him because he was handsome,” was the gist of my father’s argument. After college, I ended up working in politics, first for a political consultant, then on former GOP Representative John B. Anderson’s abortive attempt to form a third party in 1984. (I decided to leave politics after that campaign; the whole business just felt dirty and underhanded. I decided to make my living writing about the music industry. I thought it would be less venal. Like Rick, when he tells Capt. Reynaud that he came to Casablanca for the waters, “I was misinformed.”)
My experience (and movie references) may be rooted in the 20th century, but I do know one political truth that remains in force today: You can’t change anyone’s mind if you’re not in the room. So it disturbs me when I hear Jews exhorting other Jews to abandon the Democratic Party.
And let’s table any discussion about Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Ahmad El-Sayad and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and any of the Democratic Socialists running on the Democratic line. Call them progressive, socialist, woke, antisemitic or antizionist, they’re currently a small minority of the party and thankfully, I don’t have to vote for them. If you don’t like the direction they’re taking the party, the only way to stop it is to provide a viable alternative. But if you leave, you allow them to set the terms of the debate. The way to push them out of the spotlight isn’t to throw up your hands, cry it’s unfair and take your bat and ball home. You need to get in the trenches, and convince enough people that your cause is righteous and to get behind a candidate or legislation more to your liking. Even in the age of Zoom meetings and Trump’s bread and circus rallies, politics remains a retail business; you make your gains on a person-by-person basis.
And you’ll never change anyone’s mind by shaming them (although you could argue that American politics has entered its “no shame” era). If anyone starts yelling about my perceived shortcomings, my back immediately stiffens and I’ll yell back, even louder, that they are wrong … even if I know they’re right. In an age where no grievance goes unspoken, I’m guessing I’m not the only one who feels this way. If you’ve read Robert Caro’s now-five-volume life of Lyndon Johnson, you know that the real work of politics – the arm twisting and horse trading that used to grease legislation to passage – was done away from the cameras, in the cloakroom.
There are probably some of you who can remember when Democrats and Republicans not only worked on legislation together, but were friends away from the Capitol. Democratic Speaker of the House Tip O’Neill was known to regularly share a civilized beverage with Republican President Ronald Reagan. It’s probably harder to achieve this level of comity at a time where “transparency” has become a war cry and on-line influencers are ready to pounce on anyone who veers even slightly from partisan dogma. (It would probably also be easier if the person currently occupying the Oval Office wasn’t a toxic narcissist with an understanding of the Constitution picked up by from watching “Schoolhouse Rock’s” “I’m Just a Bill.”)
People used to talk about political parties being a “big tent,” and mean it as a compliment. Nowhere is it written you have to agree with every position taken by every candidate running as a member of your party. There used to be a time where there were conservative Democrats like the “boll weevils” of the 1980s, who often voted with the GOP, and liberal Republicans like New York Governor Nelson Rockefeller and Senator Jacob Javits. Today, unless you check all the boxes, you immediately become part of the enemy. Now it’s who can bring out the base, usually by scaring them about “the other.” It was only 18 years ago that the GOP Presidential candidate, Arizona Senator John McCain, who at one point wanted to nominate Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman as his vice president, told a supporter who was “scared” of the Arab Democrat Barack Obama becoming president: “Sen. Obama is a decent person and a person you don’t have to be scared of as president of the United States.” The current president, when not measuring himself for another statue, calls Democrats “radical lunatics” who “hate America.”
You might never come to an agreement with El-Sayed or Mamdani or AOC and “the Squad” about Israel and Palestine (and given that no one has come up with a solution in thousands of years, it’s pretty arrogant to think we can do it in months), but you might agree on the need to pass “Medicare for all.” As the late Ed Koch used to say, “If you agree with me on nine out of 12 issues, vote for me. If you agree with me on 12 out of 12 issues, see a psychiatrist.”
Now, if someone decided to form a party that takes good ideas from both sides of the aisle and is competent enough to create policy using those ideas, I’m certainly willing to consider it. But until then, I’m keeping my party identification Democratic. If nothing else, I’m scared my late father, buried on the other side of the country, would rise from the grave and haunt me if I don’t.
Steven Mirkin is the Journal’s copy editor.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Religious Violence and Other Failures
The End of the Beginning – A poem for Parsha Bereshit
A Bisl Torah ~ Sharp Anchoring
A Moment in Time: October 7 – We Will Not be Defined by Loss
Simchat Torah is the Antidote of Hevel
Print Issue: The Genocide Case Against Hamas | October 9, 2026
Yasmin Levy Refuses to Put Ladino Music in a Museum
The Israeli singer returns the Saban Theater in Beverly Hills on Oct. 11 with “One More Night,” bringing the mix of Ladino, flamenco and Middle Eastern music that has defined much of her work.
Amichai
‘NAZA: The Real Story’ Gains Momentum as Counter-Film Challenges Gaza Documentary
“NAZA: The Real Story” focuses on the IDF’s efforts to avoid civilian casualties while fighting Hamas, portraying an army that takes extensive precautions before carrying out strikes.
‘NAZA’ Proves Nada
“Naza” is not successful on any level as a documentary, but if judged on awards, and getting people who were already angry angrier, it very well may be.
Jewish Businessman Takes Pro-Palestinian Group to Court … and Wins
“I have no problem with freedom of speech, but don’t call me a baby killer” – Philip Krawitz
Ynon Kreiz to Leave Mattel and Co-Lead Combined Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery
Kreiz will join the board and oversee day-to-day management and integration of the businesses.
Rabbis of LA | IDF Veteran Remembers October 7, 2023
Second of two parts
The Virtues of Fresh Salads
After weeks of holiday feasting and heavy meals, the new Jewish year is a perfect time to reset, to nourish our bodies with food that is wholesome and still tastes delicious.
Table for Five: Bereshit
Primordial Light
Olympic Legend Moved By Hostage Painting
Dwight Stones, who was born in Los Angeles and is Jewish, has long been a strong supporter of Israel.
On Oct. 7, Reflections on Remembrance
Even as we mourn everything we’ve lost, let us also remember the moments of hope and healing — moments that restore our faith in humanity’s promise.
Rosner’s Domain | Remembering Oct. 7, Politically Speaking
October 7 is a day that already reverberates powerfully in the consciousness of every Jew. But the meaning of it has yet to be deciphered.
When Peace Becomes Possible: A Lesson from the South Caucasus
For Israel, and for everyone who believes that seemingly permanent conflicts need not remain permanent, what is unfolding in the South Caucasus deserves to be recognized, encouraged and protected.
Mamdani Uses Oct. 7 to Accuse Israel of the Worst Crime in History
Even on this singular day to honor the victims of Oct. 7, the mayor kept the poison coming.
The Other Shoe
I stood there in awe, my eyes blurring with tears, listening to the hush and experiencing the unnamed. I couldn’t tell which was stranger: feeling the rainforest in me, or me in the rainforest. And then my phone rang.
A New Graphic Novel Re-Presents the Bible
Following on the heels of his earlier presentations of the Passover Haggadah and the books of Esther and Jonah, Gorfinkel, known to his friends as “Gorf,” along with Israeli illustrator Yael Nathan and a team of specialized artists, have produced “The Koren Magerman Tanakh Graphic Novel: Bereshit Vol. 1,” which renders the first two Torah portions in Genesis, Bereshit and Noah, in dynamically engaging visual narrative form.
Flydubai Flight FZ1073 and the Indomitability of the Jews
FZ1073 has a message for the world. For the terrorists striving to take innumerable Israeli lives and make the survivors’ lives unbearable, the message is that your love of death will never diminish our love of life nor make us any less determined to defend it.
Achievement, Relationship, Purpose
A career becomes more rewarding when it supports rather than consumes the rest of life. Wealth becomes more meaningful when it creates security and enables generosity.
Oct. 7 Haunts the Campus
Students like me have come to understand that pro-Israel students being othered is the new campus normal. It shouldn’t be.
My Three Sons
I just completed a project I started in November 2023: taking each of my three sons on vacation separately.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.