Let’s get a few things out of the way: I am a nonobservant Jew; calling me secular might be putting too fine a point on it. I was brought up in a Reform temple in Forest Hills, Queens. Very Reform. It was one of those early 1950s temple buildings, done up in blonde wood and recessed lighting, decor a friend of mine referred to as “upscale Chinese restaurant.” We had an organ, stained glass windows, a rabbi in a business suit and tallis. To be blunt, we were probably one messiah away from being Episcopalian. And it’s not like my parents were observant; my father was the kind of Jew who’d complain that a grocery store in our neighborhood was open on Yom Kippur … as he drove past it on his way to lunch.
So it’s reasonably safe to say that everyone reading this knows more about Judaism than me. But I do know a thing or two about politics. If my parents were lax in religion, politics was a different story. I grew up in a home where voting Democratic was the 11th Commandment. The biggest fight I ever saw my parents get into was because my mother had voted for 1965 GOP mayoral candidate John Lindsay. “You only voted for him because he was handsome,” was the gist of my father’s argument. After college, I ended up working in politics, first for a political consultant, then on former GOP Representative John B. Anderson’s abortive attempt to form a third party in 1984. (I decided to leave politics after that campaign; the whole business just felt dirty and underhanded. I decided to make my living writing about the music industry. I thought it would be less venal. Like Rick, when he tells Capt. Reynaud that he came to Casablanca for the waters, “I was misinformed.”)
My experience (and movie references) may be rooted in the 20th century, but I do know one political truth that remains in force today: You can’t change anyone’s mind if you’re not in the room. So it disturbs me when I hear Jews exhorting other Jews to abandon the Democratic Party.
And let’s table any discussion about Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Ahmad El-Sayad and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and any of the Democratic Socialists running on the Democratic line. Call them progressive, socialist, woke, antisemitic or antizionist, they’re currently a small minority of the party and thankfully, I don’t have to vote for them. If you don’t like the direction they’re taking the party, the only way to stop it is to provide a viable alternative. But if you leave, you allow them to set the terms of the debate. The way to push them out of the spotlight isn’t to throw up your hands, cry it’s unfair and take your bat and ball home. You need to get in the trenches, and convince enough people that your cause is righteous and to get behind a candidate or legislation more to your liking. Even in the age of Zoom meetings and Trump’s bread and circus rallies, politics remains a retail business; you make your gains on a person-by-person basis.
And you’ll never change anyone’s mind by shaming them (although you could argue that American politics has entered its “no shame” era). If anyone starts yelling about my perceived shortcomings, my back immediately stiffens and I’ll yell back, even louder, that they are wrong … even if I know they’re right. In an age where no grievance goes unspoken, I’m guessing I’m not the only one who feels this way. If you’ve read Robert Caro’s now-five-volume life of Lyndon Johnson, you know that the real work of politics – the arm twisting and horse trading that used to grease legislation to passage – was done away from the cameras, in the cloakroom.
There are probably some of you who can remember when Democrats and Republicans not only worked on legislation together, but were friends away from the Capitol. Democratic Speaker of the House Tip O’Neill was known to regularly share a civilized beverage with Republican President Ronald Reagan. It’s probably harder to achieve this level of comity at a time where “transparency” has become a war cry and on-line influencers are ready to pounce on anyone who veers even slightly from partisan dogma. (It would probably also be easier if the person currently occupying the Oval Office wasn’t a toxic narcissist with an understanding of the Constitution picked up by from watching “Schoolhouse Rock’s” “I’m Just a Bill.”)
People used to talk about political parties being a “big tent,” and mean it as a compliment. Nowhere is it written you have to agree with every position taken by every candidate running as a member of your party. There used to be a time where there were conservative Democrats like the “boll weevils” of the 1980s, who often voted with the GOP, and liberal Republicans like New York Governor Nelson Rockefeller and Senator Jacob Javits. Today, unless you check all the boxes, you immediately become part of the enemy. Now it’s who can bring out the base, usually by scaring them about “the other.” It was only 18 years ago that the GOP Presidential candidate, Arizona Senator John McCain, who at one point wanted to nominate Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman as his vice president, told a supporter who was “scared” of the Arab Democrat Barack Obama becoming president: “Sen. Obama is a decent person and a person you don’t have to be scared of as president of the United States.” The current president, when not measuring himself for another statue, calls Democrats “radical lunatics” who “hate America.”
You might never come to an agreement with El-Sayed or Mamdani or AOC and “the Squad” about Israel and Palestine (and given that no one has come up with a solution in thousands of years, it’s pretty arrogant to think we can do it in months), but you might agree on the need to pass “Medicare for all.” As the late Ed Koch used to say, “If you agree with me on nine out of 12 issues, vote for me. If you agree with me on 12 out of 12 issues, see a psychiatrist.”
Now, if someone decided to form a party that takes good ideas from both sides of the aisle and is competent enough to create policy using those ideas, I’m certainly willing to consider it. But until then, I’m keeping my party identification Democratic. If nothing else, I’m scared my late father, buried on the other side of the country, would rise from the grave and haunt me if I don’t.
Steven Mirkin is the Journal’s copy editor.
Why I’m Staying in the Democratic Party
Steven Mirkin
Let’s get a few things out of the way: I am a nonobservant Jew; calling me secular might be putting too fine a point on it. I was brought up in a Reform temple in Forest Hills, Queens. Very Reform. It was one of those early 1950s temple buildings, done up in blonde wood and recessed lighting, decor a friend of mine referred to as “upscale Chinese restaurant.” We had an organ, stained glass windows, a rabbi in a business suit and tallis. To be blunt, we were probably one messiah away from being Episcopalian. And it’s not like my parents were observant; my father was the kind of Jew who’d complain that a grocery store in our neighborhood was open on Yom Kippur … as he drove past it on his way to lunch.
So it’s reasonably safe to say that everyone reading this knows more about Judaism than me. But I do know a thing or two about politics. If my parents were lax in religion, politics was a different story. I grew up in a home where voting Democratic was the 11th Commandment. The biggest fight I ever saw my parents get into was because my mother had voted for 1965 GOP mayoral candidate John Lindsay. “You only voted for him because he was handsome,” was the gist of my father’s argument. After college, I ended up working in politics, first for a political consultant, then on former GOP Representative John B. Anderson’s abortive attempt to form a third party in 1984. (I decided to leave politics after that campaign; the whole business just felt dirty and underhanded. I decided to make my living writing about the music industry. I thought it would be less venal. Like Rick, when he tells Capt. Reynaud that he came to Casablanca for the waters, “I was misinformed.”)
My experience (and movie references) may be rooted in the 20th century, but I do know one political truth that remains in force today: You can’t change anyone’s mind if you’re not in the room. So it disturbs me when I hear Jews exhorting other Jews to abandon the Democratic Party.
And let’s table any discussion about Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Ahmad El-Sayad and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and any of the Democratic Socialists running on the Democratic line. Call them progressive, socialist, woke, antisemitic or antizionist, they’re currently a small minority of the party and thankfully, I don’t have to vote for them. If you don’t like the direction they’re taking the party, the only way to stop it is to provide a viable alternative. But if you leave, you allow them to set the terms of the debate. The way to push them out of the spotlight isn’t to throw up your hands, cry it’s unfair and take your bat and ball home. You need to get in the trenches, and convince enough people that your cause is righteous and to get behind a candidate or legislation more to your liking. Even in the age of Zoom meetings and Trump’s bread and circus rallies, politics remains a retail business; you make your gains on a person-by-person basis.
And you’ll never change anyone’s mind by shaming them (although you could argue that American politics has entered its “no shame” era). If anyone starts yelling about my perceived shortcomings, my back immediately stiffens and I’ll yell back, even louder, that they are wrong … even if I know they’re right. In an age where no grievance goes unspoken, I’m guessing I’m not the only one who feels this way. If you’ve read Robert Caro’s now-five-volume life of Lyndon Johnson, you know that the real work of politics – the arm twisting and horse trading that used to grease legislation to passage – was done away from the cameras, in the cloakroom.
There are probably some of you who can remember when Democrats and Republicans not only worked on legislation together, but were friends away from the Capitol. Democratic Speaker of the House Tip O’Neill was known to regularly share a civilized beverage with Republican President Ronald Reagan. It’s probably harder to achieve this level of comity at a time where “transparency” has become a war cry and on-line influencers are ready to pounce on anyone who veers even slightly from partisan dogma. (It would probably also be easier if the person currently occupying the Oval Office wasn’t a toxic narcissist with an understanding of the Constitution picked up by from watching “Schoolhouse Rock’s” “I’m Just a Bill.”)
People used to talk about political parties being a “big tent,” and mean it as a compliment. Nowhere is it written you have to agree with every position taken by every candidate running as a member of your party. There used to be a time where there were conservative Democrats like the “boll weevils” of the 1980s, who often voted with the GOP, and liberal Republicans like New York Governor Nelson Rockefeller and Senator Jacob Javits. Today, unless you check all the boxes, you immediately become part of the enemy. Now it’s who can bring out the base, usually by scaring them about “the other.” It was only 18 years ago that the GOP Presidential candidate, Arizona Senator John McCain, who at one point wanted to nominate Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman as his vice president, told a supporter who was “scared” of the Arab Democrat Barack Obama becoming president: “Sen. Obama is a decent person and a person you don’t have to be scared of as president of the United States.” The current president, when not measuring himself for another statue, calls Democrats “radical lunatics” who “hate America.”
You might never come to an agreement with El-Sayed or Mamdani or AOC and “the Squad” about Israel and Palestine (and given that no one has come up with a solution in thousands of years, it’s pretty arrogant to think we can do it in months), but you might agree on the need to pass “Medicare for all.” As the late Ed Koch used to say, “If you agree with me on nine out of 12 issues, vote for me. If you agree with me on 12 out of 12 issues, see a psychiatrist.”
Now, if someone decided to form a party that takes good ideas from both sides of the aisle and is competent enough to create policy using those ideas, I’m certainly willing to consider it. But until then, I’m keeping my party identification Democratic. If nothing else, I’m scared my late father, buried on the other side of the country, would rise from the grave and haunt me if I don’t.
Steven Mirkin is the Journal’s copy editor.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Will Sept. 30 Go Down in History Like Oct. 7?
This Just Makes It Worse
Oct. 7 Makes Me Grateful for the Secular Calendar
October 7th and the Secret of Simchat Torah
Rabbis of LA | Rabbi’s Heroic Friend Remembers Oct. 7
EarlyJ Invests More Than $510,000 to Expand Jewish Parenting Centers Across California
Our Eyes Blink — A poem for Parsha Vezot Hab’rachah
My son turned eighteen yesterday…
AFHU Bel Air Affaire, Los Angeles Jewish Film Fest Screening
Notable people and events in the Jewish LA community.
A Moment in Time: Give a Child a Summer to Remember
A Bisl Torah ~ Fragility Beckons Daily Courage
Sukkot emphasizes that which we intrinsically know. We go outside and show the world that no matter the environment, we will express our Judaism with pride and joy.
October Seventh and the Reversal Caused by Sukkot
The Antisemitism You Won’t Hear About in the News
Liat Cohen-Reeis, director of the Antisemitism Task Force at StandWithUs San Diego, has tried to bring local news media’s attention to antisemitic incidents, but has encountered disinterest.
Print Issue: Crisis of Truth | October 2, 2026
An uproar over an article showing discrimination against Jewish and Israeli writers dramatizes how ideology and politics prevail over truth.
A Free Makeover: A Bath, a Haircut and a Second Chance
At the shelters, the grooming does more than make the dogs look and smell better.
Rochelle Furstenberg, Iconic Writer, Editor, Passes Away in Jerusalem
Furstenberg has been an iconic writer and editor in Israeli and American publications for decades, including for the L.A. Jewish Journal, and her death, even at the age of 90, on the eve of Rosh Hashana, deeply moved Jerusalemites who knew her.
What Kind of Judaism Do We Want After Oct. 7?
Arthur Green, “Can Judaism Be Saved: Its Future After Gaza” (Teaneck, NJ: Ben Yehuda Press, 2025) pp. 139.
Your Organization Doesn’t Need a Chatbot. It Needs Its Hours Back.
The point of all this isn’t to replace the people who keep our institutions running. It’s to give them back the hours they spend being human copy machines, so they can spend those hours on the work only people can do.
The Architecture of L’Dor Vador: How Physical Structures Shape Jewish Values and Intergenerational Life
This is more than a proposal to construct apartments. It is an invitation to reconsider what a Jewish institution can be.
Stuffed with Spice and Simcha
The custom of eating stuffed vegetables on Simchat Torah is to symbolize the scrolls of the Torah filled with the wisdom of the holy text.
Table for Five: Simchat Torah
Exclusive After-Party
Crisis of Truth
An uproar over an article showing discrimination against Jewish and Israeli writers dramatizes how ideology and politics prevail over truth.
Rosner’s Domain | Election Day Will Just Be a Beginning
Israelis are an impatient bunch, but their political processes can drag on and on – and on.
Saudi Arabia Is Encircled. The Way Out May Run through Jerusalem
Saudi Arabia’s growing vulnerability presents Israel – and the United States – with an opportunity to deepen the partnership between two of the region’s most important forces against extremism.
Two Elections, One People
On October 27, Israelis will elect the 26th Knesset. A week later, on November 3, Americans will vote in pivotal midterm elections.
The Return to Biblicalness
Shattering as it’s been, there’s something to be said for this abrupt return to biblicalness. By this awkward word I don’t mean belief in religion, necessarily, but appreciation for values that have fallen into disfavor in our supposedly enlightened age.
FlyDubai Flight to Tel Aviv Diverted to Saudi Arabia After Cockpit Stabbing
Israeli officials spent much of the day examining whether the incident aboard Flight FZ1073 was an attempted terrorist attack.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.