fbpx

February 4, 2025

When It’s OK Not to Feel Better

In response to Hamas’ hideous brutality in orchestrating hostage releases amid ravenously bloodthirsty masses, as well as news that some of the hostages that Hamas will release to Israel will be dead, I decided to devote a column to pleading for radical Jewish self-love and self-care. 

Yes, I was going to plead with fellow Jews, including myself, to not let even the most devastating news or hideous images from Israel or Gaza break them. And it all started with a phone call to two friends whom I knew were not eating well or getting enough sleep because they were obsessed with refreshing their news feeds to know about the fate of the hostages, including two precious, red-haired children whose faces have broken our own hearts on social media and other campaigns since Oct. 7. Their father, Yarden Bibas, was released this week, and returned to Israel without his wife and sons. But the sight of his return, however joyous for so many, still signaled something deeply empty, and, perhaps, even ominous. 

I begged one friend who loves Israel, and who could barely bring herself to eat, to stock her refrigerator with at least one or two foods that brought her joy, whether a few slices of rich, chocolate cake or a truly great sandwich — you know, the kind of sandwich that gives all sandwiches a good name. 

I implored another friend to watch a few guilty pleasures on TV. Not violent dramas or morbid detective documentaries (there’s nothing wrong with dark entertainment, but this particular friend was on the verge of falling apart if she stepped too hard on a twig). She needed mindless, gratuitous entertainment; the kind of forget-reality, made-for-TV film that features a brilliant but stubborn single woman who meets an equally stubborn single man on a last-minute trip to Ireland, Alaska or Poughkeepsie. She’s a successful workaholic; he’s a surprisingly well-read farmhand. The most gratifying part of the movie is when they finally manage to get together. 

This, I convinced myself, is what I, my friends, and millions of other Jews needed: a great sandwich. A predictably feel-good movie. Warm whiskey, Fluffy socks. Yearnful prayer. An Epsom salt bath. Whenever a Jew is stressed, the answer is always prayer, a sandwich, and a warm Epsom salt bath. 

This column was going to be so convincing that it would almost be impossible to dispute its main point: When in doubt, a stressed-out, anxious, post-Oct. 7 Jew who is not eating, not sleeping, not spending enough time with family or friends or taking enough walks, should have only one thought in mind: Would news of one more deteriorating Jew make Hamas happy? If the answer is yes, then Jews must practice self-nourishment and take true joy in life. Now. 

It’s a nice thought, isn’t it? Since Oct. 7, each time I have wondered whether I should decline an invitation to a simcha (a happy occasion) or put that container of real-cream chocolate mousse back on the supermarket shelf, I have only asked myself one question: Will that make Hamas happy?

This column was going to be one for the ages. It would be so timeless that generations of future stressed Jews would read it. “In 2025, columnist Tabby Refael wisely implored current and future generations of world Jewry to nourish themselves, their loved one and their communities,” Jews in 2050 would undoubtedly say to their AI overlords. 

I had this week’s column completely planned out. And then, I crawled into bed. 

I couldn’t sleep. It didn’t matter, because I didn’t want to sleep. I didn’t want a bath or a slice of cake or a deliciously bad made-for-TV film. Mothers and fathers, brothers and sisters, had been butchered; some would be arriving back to Israel in body bags. And that was when I realized that not only was my overwhelming sense of sadness, grief, and helplessness appropriate, but that maybe, I didn’t want to feel better. Not at that moment. 

No, we can’t counter the thought of toddler-sized body bags with a decadent dessert. We can’t anticipate the sight of a tiny coffin, wrapped in an Israeli flag, being lowered into the ground, and respond with a bath. We are broken. And broken we may remain until we are ready to put parts of ourselves back together again. 

To be frank, I’m not sure I want to meet a Jew today who is 100% okay, skipping through life as if the screams of his brethren in Israel don’t exist. Maybe we don’t always want to eat. Or sleep. Or laugh. But though we are broken, it does not mean that we should actively look for ways to continue to break ourselves. 

On Oct. 7, Hamas broke a collective vessel of global Jewry that was already covered with patched-up cracks from millennia of persecution and trauma. But that doesn’t mean that we should take a metaphoric ice pick to ourselves as well. 

If, currently, you can’t sleep, at least eat well. If your diet is fine, get more sleep. Increase the number of friends you call each day by one (most of us will inevitably end up calling one friend a day). Replace 15 minutes of phone scrolling with reading a book or a magazine. It doesn’t matter whether it’s a historical fiction book, Popular Mechanics or the latest Trader Joe’s flyer filled with strange, nineteenth-century-style drawings — Jews are a People of the Book, not the phone. 

It is possible to exist in two spaces: one filled with sorrow for what was, and deep worry for what will be (released Palestinian murderers aren’t exactly embodiments of growth and teshuva), and another space filled with doing everyone one needs to continue living, and hopefully, thriving. 

If one anticipates eventually having to drive on a bumpy, terrible road, it doesn’t mean that they don’t change the oil, replace the filters, and clean the windshield for a better view. If anything, taking care of that vehicle before exposing it to a bumpy road and desolate terrain is more important to  ensure that it, and us, will make it through the journey in one piece.

I learned a lot from an X post by organizational psychologist and bestselling author Adam Grant, who wrote, “In hard times, urging people to stay positive doesn’t boost their resilience. It denies their reality. People in pain don’t need good vibes only. They need a hand to stay steady through all the vibrations. Strength doesn’t come from forced smiles. It comes from feeling supported.”

If reading that a former Palestinian prisoner who was sentenced to 35 – yes, 35 – life sentences for murdering Israelis was recently released makes you sick to your stomach, skip dinner. If you can’t focus during work or during a run/workout, take an hour off. Embrace this miserable, unjust pain. Just make sure to eventually let it go, at least temporarily. The chronic, historical discomfort of being a Jew is like a boomerang; it will always come back to you. But we can only hope that when it does return, we will be strong and nourished enough to receive it and throw it right back. Currently, I need a boomerang hit to the head like I need a colonoscopy administered in the dark.  

So, eat the cake, or don’t. Compulsively refresh that news site, or don’t. It’s February and we could all use a little “wintering.”

So, eat the cake, or don’t. Compulsively refresh that news site, or don’t. It’s February and we could all use a little “wintering,” a term coined by author Katherine May, whose 2020 memoir shares the same name. “Wintering” describes a time in life in which we experience both emotional and physical hibernation, a time of fallowness and literal cold in which we feel cut off from others, and from ourselves. 

But at the heart of “wintering” is an ebb and flow; a dim light of hopeful recognition that it won’t always be this hard or this bad. And in our case, a prayer that perhaps just once, that boomerang will somehow become lost, broken, or gone forever, never to return right back to us.


Tabby Refael is an award-winning writer, speaker and weekly columnist for The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles. Follow her on X and Instagram @TabbyRefael.

When It’s OK Not to Feel Better Read More »

Bob Dylan Remains Relevant

Bob Dylan, whose real name is Robert Allen Zimmerman, has a deep connection to Israel and the Jewish people. He lived in a kibbutz, performed in Israel and his son had his bar mitzvah in Israel. He was honored with the Nobel Prize for Literature in 2016, and his exceptional song of 1983, “Neighborhood Bully,” reveals an astute knowledge of Jews throughout history.

The current movie based on his life, “A Complete Unknown,” is a tribute to his relevance even today. But while the movie portrays his early years, it does not mention his Judaism.

In ten short stanzas, “Neighborhood Bully” describes the Jewish past and present, primarily in Israel, with references to the diaspora. The song was composed during the 1982 Lebanon war and portrays Israel as the powerful bully in the eyes of the enemy and the world. The song is a profound meditation and lament. Its soulful tone registers well whether read as a poem or heard as a song.

The structure of the song allows for the expression of the Jewish predicament in a striking way. First and foremost, each stanza begins and ends with the words “neighborhood bully,” which portrays not the enemies trying to destroy the Jews as the bully, but the Jewish victims. This rhetorical device reflects the perverse moral inversion that existed in 1983 and persists today: The victim is presented as the aggressor and the aggressor as the victim. By the end of the song, the repetition of the moral inversion strikes the reader or listener as a bitter irony, an outrageous perversion of the obvious truth. The constant repetition becomes a hammer blow to the lie it embodies.

The rhyming scheme is a traditional rhyme (“one”/”run”; “survive”/”alive”) and gives the impression of tradition, decorum, normalcy and structure, whereas the truth is the opposite. The irony again is striking. The traditional form, instead of reassuring, reveals the lie at the heart of the song. Behind the façade of normalcy is an ugly reality—nothing is normal about the perception and treatment of the Jew: It is unfair, unjust and murderous.

A grotesque and shocking revelation emerges from the words and images: Jews live in an ordered, structured world with no place for them. Their world is anything but normal and structured. The traditional poetic form is employed to awaken the reader or listener to a deeply disturbing reality of Jewish alienation and isolation. Nothing is reliable, solid or lasting in society for the Jew.

The song is structured to portray the Jewish situation throughout history and in 1983, which clearly has relevance and immediacy today. It opens with the Jews in Israel besieged, outnumbered and with no place to run. They live only to survive. The third stanza evokes the past, when Jews were driven out and wandering, but the juxtaposition of 1983 and the past suggests that Jews are always either homeless and wandering or in their own land and vulnerable, “on trial for being born.”

Dylan goes on to demonstrate that Jewish resistance is condemned and that it is virtually impossible to live by the rules that “the world makes for him.” The hypocrisy creates a world of double standards in which Jews cannot prevail or even survive.

The song stresses that there are no real allies. The nations of the world are “pacifists,” calling for ceasefire: They “wait for this bully to fall asleep,” a chilling portrayal of today’s situation.

The song stresses that there are no real allies.

Dylan reminds us that Judaism itself is the target as much as the people, as “his holiest books have been trampled upon” and yet, the truth is that the Jew has contributed so much to the world: He “took the crumbs of the world and turned it into wealth/ took sickness and disease and turned it into health.”

The song covers much history and geography and concludes with a cri de coeur, a Job-like bewilderment: “What has he done to wear so many scars?” Like Job, he asks the one agonizing question that has no answer: “Why?” Does the Jew have the power to cause the problems of which he is accused? (“Does he change the course of rivers?”)

Like all artistic expression, the song/poem does more than lay out the facts. It expresses how Dylan feels and summons the emotions of the listener. By the end of the work, the listener, Jewish or not, has a profound understanding of the situation, past and present, and a profoundly personal relationship with the songwriter’s experience.

The Jew is “running out the clock, time standing still.” Dylan suggests that the Jew is marking time, but waiting for what? For the world to wake up and see the error of its ways? For the Messiah? Yet time stands still. No change. No progress. The Jew, as portrayed, is trapped, in time and space, whether in his land or not.

The song can be read as a cry of despair, an expression of Dylan’s bewilderment, perhaps a wakeup call to the world to change its ways.

What do you think?


Dr. Paul Socken is Distinguished Professor Emeritus and founder of the Jewish Studies program at the University of Waterloo.

 

Bob Dylan Remains Relevant Read More »

The Day My Cake Died

Of all the insights offered by my first therapist, the one that still reverberates is that I am  “kitchen proud.” She accused me of caring so much about food that I was off-balance. I thought she was over-analyzing. So I turned it into a career.

The next 40 years were a whirlwind of developing recipes, writing cookbooks and feeding others. Occasionally I wondered: How could my self-esteem be so tied up with producing the best coconut cupcakes for an elementary school bake sale that I would give up sleep? I put my nose down and kept on cooking.

Eventually, with the kids gone and the hubby a vegetarian, my cooking slowed down. These days I rarely cook a dinner party completely from scratch. Instead I dress up various prepared foods on pretty platters, pick up a crusty sourdough bread from a bakery, select a good wine, and enjoy the conversation. Baking, on the other hand, I can’t give up. Nothing compares to making a French lemon tart or pound cake, a flourless chocolate cake, pistachio madeleines, or a simple apricot tart in the summer. My guests expect it and I enjoy the activity.

Unlike cooking from a recipe, which anyone who can read can do, baking takes practice. It’s a solo pursuit for perfectionists. The joy is in crafting something sublime out of the simplest ingredients—eggs, butter, sugar and flour. Baking takes precision, focus and the ability to move slowly and confidently through a list of ingredients and finicky techniques. There’s a reason the pastry station in fine restaurants is usually set in a quiet corner, away from the hustle of the line. It takes concentration. Even the best baker fails sometimes due to a mismeasurement, a forgotten ingredient, an urgent text, or the humidity in the room.

Being the cake lady in the neighborhood is like being Santa Claus. You have to show up with treats; people expect it. Adults revert to childhood around pretty cakes. You don’t have to be Freud to see the triggers. Cakes are perfectly round confections of pastry spread with chunks of juicy fruit, whipped cream, shredded coconut or nuts, and topped with waves of frosting, bright candles and happy messages.

They are the perfect food for sharing, though cutting into a cake is a tense moment for the baker. Once you pull out a slice, failures become evident. Occasionally they stick to the bottom, or they just collapse! Cakes are served at celebrations like weddings and birthday parties because, like a champagne toast, the ritual brings us together. For that reason I was never a fan of the cupcake tower.

This Hanukkah I had a chance to work my old magic. When a good friend invited us over for the first night I was so happy I decided to pull out all the stops. I made a favorite single layer dark chocolate orange torte topped with a glossy chocolate butter glaze. Pulling off this elegant flourless cake meant measuring tiny quantities, separating eggs, melting expensive chocolate, zesting an orange, using a thermometer, and then finally removing it from its pan while praying. It took several hours over two days to make.

It took several hours over two days to make.

Transporting my creation was a minutely planned operation. My husband has been trained. He knows to hold it with two hands while we take turns getting in and out of the car. He drives slowly, takes turns with care and is light on the brakes when pastry is onboard. To protect my cake from the bustle of latke-making in the kitchen when we arrived, I placed it on a high shelf and told the hostess to let me know when it was time to serve.

When the last latke was eaten my friend hoisted my dream cake in the air like an Olympic torch, cleared her throat and asked, “Are you ready to slice the cake?” Before I could stand, my creation took a nose dive off its sleek platter. Then, in slow motion, it did a double flip down a spiral staircase and crash landed, upside-down on the steps and walls. The whole disaster took 20 seconds.

I was broken. Guests got busy scraping frosting off the stairs and sweeping moist crumbs into dust pans. A few sliver-lining types even said that the hideous mess still tasted delicious. They swallowed crumbs to prove it. I suppose they were trying to help me feel better.

But recovery takes time. I’ve decided that the next time a friend asks me to bring a cake I’m buying a mix just like normal people do. The kind that takes 30 minutes to make and doesn’t serve your heart and soul on a cake platter. Promise you won’t tell anyone?


Los Angeles food writer Helene Siegel is the author of 40 cookbooks, including the “Totally Cookbook” series and “Pure Chocolate.” She runs the Pastry Session blog. 

The Day My Cake Died Read More »

Trump Pressuring Iran Is Far More Important than “Taking Over” Gaza

President Trump’s announcement on Tuesday that the U.S. will take over Gaza had the shock value of the trade that brought Luka Doncic to my beloved Lakers. For days, that’s all the NBA ecosystem could talk about.

Similarly, the notion of Trump possibly developing oceanfront property in Gaza has sucked up all the media oxygen. This has all the elements of a media firestorm that will be with us for awhile.

First, it breaks the highly sensitive taboo of “transferring” a population in a region where that very notion is supercharged.

Second, it has just enough logic to keep the story going. Gaza right now is neither livable nor safe. The Strip has turned into infested rubble littered with random explosives. Trump would like neighboring countries to take the Gazans under their wing while the Strip is rebuilt. There’s a humanitarian logic to that.

Third, for all its innovation and humanitarian impulse, the idea raises a boatload of questions that will keep pundits and officials busy for weeks. What happens to Hamas? What happens to the hostages? To the ceasefire? How will Israel’s hard right react given that they dream of resettling Gaza?

Who will pay for this Gaza Riviera? Who will supervise the plans? Who will live there? Will the Palestinians who moved away be able to return, and if so, where will they live?

If the U.S. will run the show, what will be Israel’s role? Who will run the Strip after it’s rebuilt? How will that leadership be determined?

More urgently, what if the neighbors don’t want to take the Gazans, or the Gazans themselves don’t want to move? And is the whole thing even legal?

Those are just a few obvious questions off the top of my head.

“The idea was breathtaking in its audacity,” is how Jonathan Lemire described it in The Atlantic, “and it would be fair to say that its implementation would run into myriad obstacles at home and abroad, except that the overwhelming likelihood is that the U.S. would never come near implementing this notion.”

The point is, the “U.S. taking over Gaza” is one of those fantasies that will hijack many news cycles but will be lucky to get to first base.

Trump’s order on Iran, however, is a home run that can happen immediately.

The plan is not just simple but doable: Apply “maximum pressure” on the world’s #1 sponsor of terror that will drive its oil exports down to zero. Iran can’t do anything without that oil money. The Biden administration went soft on them, hoping it could convince the mullahs to sign a nuclear deal. That never happened, and neither did the sanctions. We ended up with a lose-lose: no nuclear deal and a terror regime full of cash that continued to wreak havoc.

Israel’s recent military victories have severely weakened both Iran and its terror proxies. The regime is now vulnerable. The key question is: What should Trump do if the maximum pressure campaign leads the regime to say it’s ready to make a nuclear deal?

My suggestion: don’t trust them. When you negotiate with a regime that considers lying and cheating its official policy, there’s no such thing as a “good deal.” Better to keep the maximum pressure on to encourage opposition forces to topple the regime.

Terms like “regime change” are not usually spoken in polite company. They sound too clandestine. That’s why we shouldn’t expect it to be official policy.

But we know that’s what the Iranian people want and need. They’ve suffered under a brutal regime for many long decades. Any regime that jails its women because they don’t wear their religious head garb properly deserves neither respect nor power.

Trump’s comment on Wednesday that “I want Iran to be a great and successful Country, but one that cannot have a Nuclear Weapon,” was short-sighted. The evil of Iran goes way beyond its nuclear program.

For too long, we got suckered into seeing Iran’s nuclear ambitions as our only problem with the despotic theocracy, which the mullahs have exploited to manipulate us. This focus on the bomb while neglecting mass oppression is an insult to the Iranian people.

Yes, we must deal with Iran’s nuclear threat. Apparently, now that it feels cornered, Iran is reportedly racing to develop a “crude” nuclear weapon. Military action is the surest way to disable it. But that is no reason to stop there. Morally, we should feel obligated to continue weakening the regime and empowering its opposition.

Iran doesn’t need a nuclear weapon to jail, oppress and brutalize its people. The Iranian people need to know that our interest is also to help liberate them.

Trump’s announcement of maximum pressure on Iran may have gotten smothered by his bombshell announcement on Gaza, but it deserves our maximum attention.

In this case, taking down an evil regime that is a threat to the world, in a country where no one needs to move, is a lot more valuable than trying to move a whole population that may not even want to move.

The only thing that will move in Iran are the hearts of a people crying for its freedom.

Trump Pressuring Iran Is Far More Important than “Taking Over” Gaza Read More »

Trump: ‘The U.S. Will Take Over the Gaza Strip’

President Donald Trump said that the United States would take control of the Gaza Strip after the war there ends, a significant pledge and a sharp change from previous American policy in the region.

Trump made the pledge in a press conference on Tuesday evening alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is visiting Washington D.C.

The proposal to take control of Gaza builds on Trump’s efforts to persuade Middle Eastern countries to take in Palestinians from Gaza — a plan he doubled down on in his remarks Tuesday. But in the press conference, he went further — saying that the United States would “take over” the area, clear it of explosives and rebuild it, a daunting task after much of the enclave has been destroyed.

“The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip and we will do a job with it too,” he said. “We’ll own it, and be responsible for dismantling all of the dangerous unexploded bombs and other weapons on the site. Level the site and get rid of the destroyed buildings.”

He added that the United States would “create an economic development that will supply unlimited numbers of jobs and housing for the people of the area.”

The idea Trump proposed has never been seriously suggested before. While various proposals have suggested that a multinational force could secure Gaza after the war ends, none of the plans that have been made public envision the United States fully taking control of the territory. The Biden administration had pushed for the West Bank-based Palestinian Authority to take a leading role in governing the site, an idea Netanyahu rejected.

Israel’s neighbors have rejected the idea of depopulating Gaza, and have historically supported Palestinians governing Gaza. In response to whether the United States had the right to take over Gaza, Trump said he saw the United States controlling the area long-term. He also said the United States would be making an announcement regarding Israeli West Bank annexation within the next four weeks.

“I do see a long-term ownership position and I see it bringing great stability to that part of the Middle East and maybe the entire Middle East,” he said. “This was not a decision made lightly. Everyone I’ve spoken to loves the idea of the United States owning that piece of land, developing and creating thousands of jobs.”

In his remarks at the press conference, Netanyahu appeared to support Trump’s proposal. He called it “something that could change history.”

“The third goal is to make sure that Gaza never poses a threat to Israel again,” he said, referring to his government’s objectives in its war against Hamas. “President Trump is taking it to a much higher level. he sees a different future for that piece of land that has been the focus of so much terrorism, so many attacks against us, so many trials and so many tribulations. he has a different idea, and I think it’s worth paying attention to this.”

Trump: ‘The U.S. Will Take Over the Gaza Strip’ Read More »

A Former Nazi “Paradise” Will Be Transformed into a Global Center for Combatting Antisemitism

The former Polish residence of the Nazi commandant at Auschwitz will soon open its doors to the public as a center dedicated to combatting antisemitism, extremism and hate.

The property at 88 Legionow Street, dubbed “House 88,” served as the family home to Rudolph Höss, the orchestrator behind the gas chambers and crematorium at Auschwitz, where approximately one million Jews were sent to their deaths. The upscale villa, once famously referred to by Höss’ wife as a “paradise” with its lush gardens and a swimming pool, was recently purchased by New York-based charity the Counter Extremism Project (CEP), with the intention of transforming it into a space for research, education and advocacy.

A view of the backyard entrance of House 88 (Photo by Omar Marques/Getty Images)

“I cannot imagine a more symbolic form of justice for the millions of lives lost at the hands of the Nazis than turning what was once a breeding ground for evil into a space that fights against those very ideals,” said entrepreneur and philanthropist Elliott Broidy.

Broidy, along with Dr. Thomas Kaplan, co-chairs The Fund to End Antisemitism, Extremism, and Hate, the organization launching the fundraising initiative for the new Auschwitz Research Center on Hate, Extremism, and Radicalization (ARCHER) at House 88 in partnership with CEP, the Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum and UNESCO.

“Elie Wiesel rightly said that ‘we must never forget’ the Holocaust to ensure the end of such hate and to prevent another genocide,” said Ambassador Mark D. Wallace, CEO and Founder of CEP at a recent event in Poland announcing the purchase of the commandant’s former home. “The ordinary house of the greatest mass murderer will now be converted into the extraordinary symbol of that fight.”

While Höss was instructed by Heinrich Himmler to set up the concentration camp in 1940, it was Höss who experimented with Zyklon B gas and built what became a mass extermination camp, while just beyond its perimeters stood his family’s upscale home.

After the liberation of Auschwitz in 1945, the home was purchased by a Polish family and remained mostly out of the public eye until it was featured in the 2023 Oscar-winning movie “The Zone of Interest.” With the film’s popularity came much unwanted attention to the three-story house and its owners, and eventually they decided to sell.

A view of the former Auschwitz Concentration Camp from one of the bedrooms of House 88. (Photo by Omar Marques/Getty Images)

Repurposing the house and its surrounding grounds, which overlook the camp, will include a redesign of the interior as well as the addition of a new building. Famed architect Daniel Libeskind has been commissioned for the project. Libeskind, who is Polish American and the son of Holocaust survivors, is responsible for the iconic Jewish Museum in Berlin among other buildings.

Broidy and Kaplan officially announced the launch of the major fundraising campaign for ARCHER at House 88 on January 27th, International Holocaust Remembrance Day and the 80th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, calling it a future hub for scholarly research, policy development, and public education.

The ARCHER initiative is now actively seeking additional support to expand its programs, which will include a fellowship for leading scholars focused on extremism research, educational programs for policymakers, educators, and the public, as well as policy advocacy strategies to combat hate.

A Former Nazi “Paradise” Will Be Transformed into a Global Center for Combatting Antisemitism Read More »

Book Takes on the Story of a Catholic Mistaken for a Jew at a Nazi Labor Camp

Chris Bensinger’s novel “The Sooner You Forget” follows the story of a young Catholic man who, while serving in the United States Army, ends up in a Nazi labor camp. It takes readers through the lasting effects of trauma, showing what happens when painful truths are suppressed—whether imposed by others or self-inflicted.

The book begins in a suburb of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, shortly after the Allied invasion of Normandy in 1944. Charlie Buckley, a hotheaded baseball player, dreams of going professional. But in the city championship game, in front of major league scouts, an umpire makes a bad call. Charlie loses his temper, and his dreams of going pro — and escaping his home life — are shattered.

Soon after, Charlie starts a romance with a Jewish girl named Sandee Gold. His bigoted father disapproves, seeing their relationship as unacceptable. Though his father harbors hatred toward Germans, he supports the Nazi persecution of Jews in Europe. Charlie is drafted into the U.S. Army Air Corps and ships out to Europe, carrying a photo and note from Sandee, now his fiancée.

One of Charlie’s closest friends in his unit, Jacob, is a soldier studying to become a rabbi. A well-paced, frightening set of scenes leads to Charlie, Jacob and their fellow soldiers being captured by the Nazis. While being a prisoner of war is already brutal enough, Charlie is mistakenly identified as Jewish and sent with them to the Berga labor camp.

“Initially, I was writing a story about a young kid growing up in the Midwest in kind of a complex family dynamic, and his way out would be through baseball,” Bensinger told the Journal. “I was at my mother-in-law’s house in Florida, and they had a bunch of old Life magazines. And there was this vague reference to this slave labor death camp called Berga, where they had taken only American Jewish soldiers and others.”

Bensinger spent a year researching Berga and the stories of those who survived. Though Charlie’s story is fictional, the characters are well-developed and their troubles are painfully vivid to read.

One of the most gut-wrenching moments comes when Charlie, realizing he may not survive, asks Jacob to convert him.

“He could have a sense that he would go in peace connected to the woman he loved and the faith that he learned about through the trials and the horrors of what went on to the Jewish soldiers,” Bensinger said.

The Jewish American soldiers who survived Berga were forced by the U.S. government to sign nondisclosure agreements, forbidding them from speaking about their capture. While researching the story, Bensinger, who himself isn’t Jewish, discovered as an adult that he had relatives who were murdered in the Holocaust.

“The history of what went on my father’s side, it was just buried,” Bensinger said. “It was never spoken of. And so through my research when I found a distant cousin, another Bensinger whose family, many of them were murdered by the Nazis, I was floored. It was, it’s almost like when Charlie says, ‘It’s as if Berga never existed.’”

Bensinger, has spent much of his career in storytelling and theater, producing Broadway musicals such as “The Book of Mormon” and “La Cage aux Folles.” With this well-dramatized debut novel, Bensinger sees the arts as a critical means of processing and conveying these experiences.

“I think that any time one can experience healing through trauma, and that means telling the story of what went on, trauma doesn’t really go away,” Bensinger said. “You learn to live with it. In that sense, I tell people not to feel you have to bottle this up just because it’s been belabored or ‘that isn’t the truth of how human beings are.’ We’re emotional human beings, and that carries down through our genes. It’s really a hereditary trauma.

“Through Charlie, we all can recognize how we can navigate holding in the truth—and it needs to come out.”

“The Sooner You Forget” was published on Feb. 4 and can be found anywhere books are sold.

Book Takes on the Story of a Catholic Mistaken for a Jew at a Nazi Labor Camp Read More »