fbpx

February 13, 2024

Chosen Links – February 11, 2024

How exciting it is if you can meet an athelete you’ve followed for decades, and how refreshing it is when that person lives up to all expectations. In the early 2000s, I started watching poker tournaments on the Travel Channel’s World Poker Tour (WPT). There were fun characters including Phil Helmuth, Doyle Brunson, and more. I had started hosting poker games a few years prior, but my poker history really went back to my childhood.

Poker champion Perry Green took me into his beautiful Alaskan home for not one but 2 different summers. His daughter Beth lived in my family’s home for a few years to receive a Jewish high school education, and she was basically a big sister to me. The sort of really FUN big sister, who would take me out on late night runs to 7-Eleven for slurpees, and teach me music from Madonna’s new “Like a Prayer” album, and…bring me with to Alaska.

Jumping ahead to my early 20s, I not only watched each and every WPT episode, but like most poker fans, I loved watching Daniel Negreanu play. He was young, funny, and incredibly intelligent. What I didn’t know until much, much more recently, is that he is ALSO a tremendous ally to Israel, right when those are in short supply and most appreciated.

When I started writing my Chosen Links section, I immediately wanted to Spotlight those who have our backs. When I mentioned choosing Daniel Negreanu, it was my friend Ronnie Bardah who set it up for me, and within minutes, I was on the phone with a poker legend. I’m proud to start of this week’s section with my own piece here:

https://jewishjournal.com/…/poker-champion-daniel…/

As we transition to this week’s Chosen Links, the photograph is of me with my bestie Kevin in Israel, exploring the beautiful caves of Beit Guvrin, while our babies explored the earth.

ARTICLES/THREADS:

1a. My aforementioned best friend Kevin Lev lives in Israel, and hosted our family on our last visit. Recently, he has started to put his thoughts and feelings into poetry, and they are hauntingly beautiful. This first one is about his visit to the devastation of Kfar Aza. As he explained it, “every red dot you see, means someone died in that home, and Zaka had to collect the body”:

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02NfmBZsP4vjxbjvgRJdTcgMzAhP3u62WPr5G2CYxUQpUM1U7angZrqe4Hgs3mgzYil&id=590390493

1b. This poem takes the Gaza terror tunnels, and through Kevin’s mind’s eye, they evoke images of WWI trenches:

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0feqbw9zNFcYckH7dcWSba2dr6YTUDUL2B1W1dcM4bJtvU135UggQFBZmFLJ6DrhTl&id=590390493

1c. Here Kevin visits something you wouldn’t think about, the “graveyard” of cars from October 7th. Oh the stories they would tell, if they could speak:

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02MMCwf2x9yfwJWy5VMjd2YkrbiAQkgygz14Z1FdaHWh7MwFtW3SVjhdiyfjUNnUZ4l&id=590390493

2. Somehow I missed this article a few months ago, an embarrassing fact considering it’s written by my cousin! Alon Goshen-Gottstein is one of the world’s leading Rabbis and people who promote interfaith dialogue. I still remember the proud day he was the one who welcomed the Pope to Israel!

He writes sensitively about the justness of the war that Israel fights, but the prayer he has that the IDF not forget to live up to their reputation as an extremely moral army. “Golda Meir is famously said to have quipped: “When peace comes, we will, perhaps, in time, be able to forgive the Arabs for killing our sons, but it will be harder for us to forgive them for having forced us to kill their sons.” Regardless of whether she said these precise words, the question they raise is what engaging in persistent battles does to our hearts and souls.” It’s jarring to think that many men and woman 40 and under in Israel, are forced to find out:

https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/whom-do-we-pray-for…/

3a. Fern Reiss strikes gold as usual, this time explaining why a new, bigger ceasefire is unlikely to work, or even happen. She goes through detailed theories of what will actually play out when a ceasefire is about to begin:

“In anticipation of it…Lebanon will send too many missiles our way, or we’ll take out one too many Hezbollah leaders, and there will be all-out war. In such a scenario, Hamas won’t be able to resist jumping in for more, and we’ll be fighting a multi-front war overnight.” This isn’t the only scenario she describes:

https://fernmusing.substack.com/p/war-day-122-analysis

3b. Fern scares me, with this necessary topic about Iran, and the possibility of a much bigger war. “Iranian proxies are getting more ornery and bolder. Iran is using the Houthis to control global shipping, via which it can control the world economy. Lebanon just rejected a proposal for Hezbollah withdrawal to the Litani River and is about to start a real war. This is all being orchestrated from Iran…Iran is encouraging the radicalization of Moslems everywhere.” Not gonna put my head in the sand, but this is disturbing:

https://fernmusing.substack.com/…/war-day-123-stop-or…

3c. You can pretty much assume I’ll always include Fern’s Sunday round-up, because it’s such a great way to get tons of news at once, in small bites, with sources. Plenty are things I didn’t know yet:

https://fernmusing.substack.com/…/war-day-128-the…

4. I’m still hoping this isn’t actually the last season of Curb Your Enthusiasm, but they say it is. So in honor of the show’s return, my friend Louis Keene did this great interview about the famous Palestinian Chicken episode! “Dershowitz said at the time that he wanted to get a copy of the show to Netanyahu and to Abbas. He thought by watching it they could share a laugh over it and see how silly all this was. I was like, “Are you f—ing kidding me? You’re gonna start World War III!” This episode is iconic, and the interview will make you smile:

https://forward.com/…/palestinian-chicken-oral-history…/

5. I have focused energy in this column on the numbers game. Everyone likes to make a huge story out of numbers. This many have been killed. That many have been injured. This many children. That many journalists. It’s the most in any war in this long. It’s the worst war ever. Rhetoric sells newspapers, gets you clicks, and fits beautifully into whatever your package of propaganda is that day. So thus, I have shared numerous fact-checking articles and threads, dedicated to proving why the numbers given by Hamas are flawed, false, and reported at face value by most of the world.

Daniel Greenfield, a journalist who admittedly is also a dear friend, goes through the history of other conflicts, and how years later there are still huge conflicting reports on the numbers. Even wars fought by America have massive ranges of the numbers. But yet, “When it comes to Gaza, the media cites no figures other than those of Hamas. And it insists at the same time that most of Gaza has been destroyed, its medical centers pulverized and its government shattered, and that this same system can not only be trusted, but is also somehow capable of producing infallible statistics that don’t exist in any other regional conflict.” I had not yet considered this point. Not only are we accepting the word of a terrorist group to give us the numbers, but it’s all the more ridiculous when they claim that their infrastructure has been destroyed. What a sad joke this is:

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/20365/least-deadly-war

6. The previous article about numbers, leads perfectly into this thread. Salo Aizenberg from Honest Reporting, gives us yet another great “Hamas Fake Casualty Update”. He makes all the usual great points, including the fact that the world often reports the Hamas given numbers at face value, but not the IDF numbers of terrorists killed. One important detail is about the fuss made over the UNRWA members killed, as reported by a Lancet study. But upon further analysis, “Recent data from @UNWatch and IDF intelligence shows ~10% of UNRWA workers are linked to Hamas/PIJ. Telegraph also reports 150 of the 152 killed were “off duty” proving that UNRWA locations were not targeted — just many Hamas terrorists some who happened to also be UNRWA.” Fascinating:

https://twitter.com/Aizenberg55/status/1754521489875808682

7a. This is gross and completely unsurprising. The city of Irvine is one of many that are having their city council meetings hijacked by anti-Israel groups to demand a ceasefire. “Once the mob gets their way, they never go away. After the ceasefire resolutions are passed, the mob returns to demand more, such as Palestinian statehood and BDS resolutions. What does any of this have to do with local city council meetings??” Thank you for helping bring this to light Bethany S. Mandel

P.S. My family lives in Irvine, and attended that particular meeting, and just hearing about it after gave me anxiety:

https://twitter.com/bethanysho…/status/1754549967899791695

7b. If you happen to be interested, you can view the entire recorded meeting here. Of personal note, my college-aged niece Eve can be seen talking at the 3 hour, 44 minute mark, which you can scroll to. I’m proud of her, because even I don’t think I could stomach speaking in a room full of such vitriol:

https://irvine.granicus.com/player/clip/6376

7c. This is an example of it happening elsewhere, it’s a campaign of disruption, not an isolated event. This is a compilation by JCRC of San Francisco of it happening in Palo Alto, on January 31:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C20EBc-MZca/

7d. Further evidence of these groups trying to gather everyone for these city council meetings are not only demanding a ceasefire, but incessantly accuse Israel of genocide. This comes from the non-profit CAIR. “In a statement, CAIR-SFBA Executive Director Zahra Billoo said: “We urge residents of all seven cities to attend tomorrow’s meetings to show their support for a resolution demanding a permanent ceasefire in Gaza to end Israel’s unrelenting onslaught against the Palestinian people and U.S. complicity in the genocide.” So to be clear, this so-called non-profit, just officially referred to this as a genocide, in their call to people. And you wonder why the meetings are full of such hateful rhetoric when these are the built in statements from leadership, yuck:

https://ca.cair.com/…/cair-sfba-urges-bay-area…/

7e. Dani Kollin was one of the pro-Israel speakers at one of these city meetings, or at least he was supposed to be. In the city of Oxnard, the public was invited to speak at their hearing for a ceasefire, only they weren’t ultimately able to, thanks to the intimidation of the protestors. “They then proceeded to shout down anyone who got up to speak in defense of Israel. After numerous warnings to the disruptors, Mayor John Zaragoza stopped the proceedings and told the police to clear the room. The protestors at first complied but then forcefully tried to push their way back in — all while vehemently shouting explicit threats at “the Zionists.” The police, outmanned and concerned for our safety, sequestered us in a back room for almost an hour, expecting the protestors to leave”.

Dani didn’t get to give his speech as a result, but was given the platform by David Suissa to do so in the paper. He went on to not only explain how reprehensible the events of October 7 were, but how offensive these resolutions were. “Given that only 13 out of 435 House members support the resolution, its likelihood of passing is extremely low. So, why on earth are you considering its endorsement —especially without examining the motives of those who’ve proposed it?” Why indeed:

https://jewishjournal.com/…/the-speech-i-was-supposed…/

8. This piece by Jacob Lerer makes me sad. Here’s a man who moved from NJ to Israel, and is pouring out his soul as to what is REALLY needed by us Diaspora Jews living outside of Israel. “While all the gear, snacks, and missions support us physically and allow those helping to feel a connection, it’s not enough. It’s not what we need. The best way to help our soldiers…and the nation as a whole is to genuinely show that you’re with us. Show that you wish to join in the pain of the nation. Show that you wish you were here with us, both suffering the lows and rejoicing in the highs. The greatest boost of strength I can receive as a soldier is the knowledge that what I’m doing is inspiring those around me to want to take part in what we’re building as well.”

At first I understand the sentiment, but later on he clarifies that everyone should be moving to Israel. I’m sad because if that’s how many feel, then nothing short of moving to Israel would really make those we care about in Israel feel our love and concern. Because for many of us, myself included, we care deeply for a land that we also have no plan to live in, but it is full of our family and friends, and is a safe haven to all of us when the world turns its back on us.

While I understand his argument that the only true testament to caring about the land is a pledge to live in it, it reminds me a bit of a famous argument involving meat. I’m aware this isn’t a perfect analogy, but bear with me. You know the thought that if you aren’t ok killing the animal yourself, or even watching the process, then you shouldn’t be ok eating it. I think both arguments are intellectually fair, but both are flawed because that’s just not the reality of human nature.

Some of us are going to be ok watching the animals be killed for our consumption, and some of us prefer to live as ignorantly as possible, enjoying the meat as free of guilt as possible. (And yes some choose to not eat meat, but that is not relevant for my fallacious analogy). Likewise, some of us are going to be ok moving to Israel, and some prefer to live outside of the Jewish state, in the hopes that things will remain bearable for us in the Diaspora. While I agree that those who move to Israel, and those who kill their own meat (and vegetarians) are the most consistent with their beliefs, there are simply too many well-meaning Diaspora Jews (or blissfully ignorant carnivores), to throw everyone out who doesn’t fit the ideal paradigm.

All of this being said, I appreciated this article even if it saddened me:

https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/a-soldiers-perspective…/

9a. Monica Osborne writes a brilliant and scathing article, about the deafening silence created by the National Women’s Studies Association (NWSA) towards the targeted sexual violence towards Jewish women (and some men). This is not a matter of the statement they released days after October 7, which was one-sided. This is not even a matter of the second statement they released 3 weeks later, when plenty of information was known about the rapes, and they still poured all of their wrath against Israel. (Both letters are linked within this article).

Ages later, the NY Times and the world was given undeniable facts. Even the UN finally came out forcefully with a statement about it. But yet, still not a word from the NWSA, “the nation’s largest network of feminist scholars, educators, and activists”, about targeted attacks on Israeli women. As Monica says, “It would not have been necessary to express support for the Israeli government. It also would not have been necessary to forgo support of Palestinian women as Gaza comes under military siege by Israel. Both groups of women deserve support by organizations claiming to fight for the rights and protection of women, but consistently only one group of women is ignored by women’s organizations: Jewish and Israeli women.” Their silence in itself speaks volumes:

https://jewishjournal.com/…/the-shameful-behavior-of…/

9b. The Zionistic Rabbinic Coalition (ZRC) was so taken aback by all of this, that they wrote a letter to the NWSA, spearheaded by Rabbi Lisa Malik. “The NWSA claims to be concerned about “gendered and sexualized harms on women and queer, trans and non-binary people” in Gaza, but does not express the same concern for women and others in Israel. The NWSA is oblivious and does not address what is done to queer, trans, and non-binarypeople in Gaza. If this was not an official statement, it would be laughable and dismissed as a joke or the invention of a satirist mocking the NWSA’s lack of common sense.”

This was on November 27. It has never received a response:

https://zionistrabbis.org/open-letter-to-the-national…/

10. The day I read this tweet, was February 7th, exactly 4 months since Hamas broke the ceasefire that was in place through October 6th. Saul Sadka recollects his dog walk, when he came to the realization that Israel would never be the same. “Any flabby complacency and indulgent divisiveness that Israel has built up over its 75-year climb from an impoverished refugee backwater, to one of the richest countries in the world, was swept away in 12 hours. It took a bloodbath to unite Israel and educate everyone under 70 what it means to be a Jew in a world of monsters.”

https://twitter.com/Saul_Sadka/status/1755173263355896115

11. This provocative article is truly fascinating. It describes the tactic of Islamic terrorists worldwide, and certainly includes Palestinian terrorists. We are very familiar with the concept of a “hit and run”, as happened to my father on October 1, 2019: https://jewishjournal.com/…/a-rosh-hashanah-hit-and-run/

We also know other concepts such as “dine and dash”, or “Netflix and chill” (you caught that? Good, you’re paying attention).

Benjamin Kerstein does a great job explaining the less familiar concept of “terrorize and weep”, where Muslim extremistst will attack (bomb, stab, shoot, stone, rape, kidnap etc), and then immediately the groups or countries behind the groups loudly play the victim card. And this tactic sadly works, repeatedly. “When Iran and its proxies start bawling over how terribly America has treated them, thousands of arms will rush to embrace them.” The number of Western people who have defended the Houthis, Hezbollah and Hamas is evidence enough of this phenomenon:

https://www.jns.org/the-weeping-terrorist/

12a. Excellent way to give perspective about Hamas, in simple, and reasonable terms. Shoshanna Keats-Jaskoll is correct in realizing that people don’t understand even the fundamentals of what they have accomplished, so she explains. “In all the years they’ve rules the strip, instead of protecting any innocent civilians, Hamas strategically put them in direct line of fire. Having built not even one bomb shelter, yet miles and miles of tunnels for itself, they protected themselves and left children to die, refusing to allow them to evacuate as Israel sought out those who killed our children.” That’s just the first of 7 great bullet points she provides:

https://x.com/skjask/status/1754407450239762758

12b. Shoshanna collaborates with others on this fabulous post, about something so simple that I’m surprised I haven’t seen more like it. I often hear the refrain about Muslims being as big, or even bigger victims of these terrorist organizations, but those statements are rarely backed up, and the posts remain within the confines of their own echo chambers.

Here they list on Instagram piece after piece of info, about how unsafe Muslims are to speak up, and the consequences many of the times they do anyway. Thank you to those who collaborated on this post, Dr. Azi Jankovic and Rawan Osman:

https://www.instagram.com/p/C3NsUSyNk2F/

13. Very interesting perspective, which makes perfect sense to me. Yes we can destroy Hamas, but even if we do, we are well aware who is behind most of these groups – Iran. As the article points out, Israel managed to hugely weaken Hezbollah in 2006, but they are stronger than ever now. These terror organizations can be cut down, but they are a Hydra, whose heads will keep growing back unless we can prevent that regrowth. Which means…Iran. The article does clarify a distinction though, “Hamas is not Hezbollah. While the latter is a virtual arm of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the Iran-Hamas relationship has been far rockier.”

The main suggestions to keep Hamas from a resurgence, are a 2-part plan. “The first must focus on disrupting the flow of funds and arms from Iran to the West Bank and Gaza…The second track must focus on preventing Gaza from following the path of Lebanon and Syria, where power vacuums allowed Iran to gain influence.” In other words, find a way to prevent a money flow to Hamas, and ensure there is leadership in place when they are gone. A very interesting read, thanks to Michael Singh and Matthew Levitt at the The Washington Institute For Near East Policy:

https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/…/only-way-stop…

14. This is long overdue. I’ve been following Zach Ross at his Zicksworld account for some time, but have never shared his wonderful efforts. That changes today.

Zach tirelessly posts written content on the one platform I haven’t figured out, Instagram. My issue with them is that you can’t write a lot, and hyperlinks don’t work. But he finds a way to provide tons of information about Israel, the war, and antisemitism, using the popular platform, and that’s so important.

In this 2-part series, Zach lists a whopping 100 facts about Israel and antisemitism, in commemoration of the 100 days the hostages had been held as of his writing the post:

Part 1: https://www.instagram.com/p/C2I6x8brQbB/

Part 2: https://www.instagram.com/p/C2I_tpCNE3u/

15. Want to knot more about Sinwar? Think he’s just a bad man to Jews and Israelis? Think he’s a man of the people for the Palestinians? Think again. “Under Sinwar’s leadership in Gaza, protests and opposition to Hamas were violently suppressed, Palestinians suspected of collaborating with Israel were brutally murdered, and Gazans who behaved contrary to Islam were also identified as collaborators and murdered. All under the control of Yahya Sinwar and often under his explicit orders.” This is a despicable, evil man, who is still alive, and a figurehead of Hamas. Thank you Ori Miller:

https://twitter.com/orielisham…/status/1755644214149300597

16. David Makovsky makes a point that I fully endorse. It’s bad enough that Netanyahu has been keeping himself in power, by empowering the most right wing coalition Israel has seen. When some of those members are pulling stunts that he lets slide, because he doesn’t want to piss them off, it costs Israel. Most of the country is upset when it happens, and you rock the boat with your American partners. There are things he needs to be hard about, like not giving into a ceasefire, but that doesn’t mean he should be pissing off all of their allies over every little thing:

https://twitter.com/DavidMakovsky/status/1755713263122145557

17. I had to read this thread 3 times, to fully take it in. Dutch journalist Philip Mechanicus died 1944, in Auschwitz. This thread brought his diary to light, after he witnessed the horrifying “Transport of the Sick”. On February 8, 1944, a”cleanup” was ordered to clear out all of the patients in the infirmary. So they used a train to take them all to Auschwitz. The conditions were so atrocious during the transport, that the doctors warned the patients to run away from the hospital, which they did:

https://twitter.com/RudiGeerts/status/1755583898908528666

18. A very useful update courtesy of Jacob Magid. Israel has long sought after a continuation of the Abraham Accords, with Saudi Arabia being the Golden Goose that remains within arm’s reach. However, these Arab countries, whether it’s from an actual giving a damn about the Palestinians (they historically haven’t), or more likely saving face, they apparently want to link further cooperation with a guarantee of a Palestinian state. The problem is, just about any Israeli leader would presently find no peace partner on the other side. And the last one to find that will be Netanyahu with his present coalition.

But this goes beyond normalization with other countries. This is in large part about other Arab countries stepping up to help with rebuilding Gaza, and acting as a security force. A cynic could argue that they are making such a demand because they know it will not be accepted, but will show them to be in good faith. In any case, there is a huge benefit to Israel on a big picture scale. “The grouping of Arab countries led by Saudi Arabia are offering Israel a partnership that could be used to more effectively combat Iran, which Netanyahu has long sought.” And a stronger defensive alliance against Iran is certainly in Israel and America’s best interest. But it’s hard to see diplomacy getting us anywhere at the moment. If there is a politician able to smooth things over and work out a deal, you would think Netanyahu and his coalition are not the ones:

https://twitter.com/JacobMagid/status/1755390598733811999

19. Dear friend Daryl Temkin is one of the most well versed people I know, when it comes to Israel. As such, I was confident I’d like this article before even reading it. He goes through the vicious attacks South Africa brought to the table against Israel, and shows how the good news is that they certainly did not achieve their goal of gaining a verdict of immediate ceasefire. On the other hand, the genie is already out of the bottle, and the damage cannot be undone. “Their real victory was getting the world to be glued to the anti-Israel headlines in their newsfeeds. They won in that millions of people heard the anti-Israel pundits…state that South Africa had a winning case for charging Israel with the most extreme war crime. South Africa successfully got the words “genocide,” “apartheid” and “Israel” to be repeated over and over through every news broadcast, heard in every language around the world. This is how antisemitism works. This is how antisemitism is nurtured and spread.” Without question, it’s already being spread:

https://jewishjournal.com/…/at-the-international-court…/

20. Maxim D. Shrayer and Maxim Matusevich team up to write a heck of an article about South Africa’s trial, but with a totally different focus than I had previously read. They are scholars of Russia and Africa, and explain not only the history of antisemitism in the Russian Empire, but they recount the timeline of Africa’s relationship with Israel. Apparently, Israel was viewed by most of Africa as a fellow underdog in the world of colonial oppression. They felt a kinship as a result, but when Israel gained closer ties with America, along with their victories against the attacking Arab countries, they stepped away.

“Until Israel’s lightning victory in the Six-Day War in 1967, Israel had been often perceived on the African continent as “one of us”—a young postcolonial state forging its nationhood. All through the 1960s and into the early 1970s, Israel expended considerable resources on cultivating close economic and political partnerships in Africa, dispatching agricultural experts, establishing joint ventures, and providing professional and military training to African countries. The shift in the attitudes toward Israel on the part of many independent African nations occurred in response to Israel’s successes on the battlefield and also to the rising alliance between Israel and the United States…The October 1973 (Yom Kippur) War had effectively ended the fraying relationships between the majority of the African nations and Israel. As the Israeli army crossed the Suez Canal in pursuit of the retreating Egyptian armed forces and thus entered Africa proper, twenty-one Black African nations severed diplomatic ties with Israel.” Absolutely fascinating:

https://jewishjournal.com/…/south-africa-accuses-the…/

21a. Douglas Murray inspires a few great comments, when he refers to how great the young generation of Israelis are. We never wanted the chance to know how we would cope, of if we would sink or swim if put in the horror show of our grandparent’s generation. But yet, today Israelis of all ages face the reality that their existence is at risk, and in many cases they have stepped up, regardless of politics and religious levels. Yoni Leviatan and Rabbi Shmuel Reichman are inspired by the thought he inspires, and feel such promise for this young generation being a light to the nations:

https://twitter.com/songsofyoni/status/1755849300402196914

21b. For full context, and because it’s a really great watch, here’s the entire interview between Douglas Murray and the Executive Director of StandWithUs Israel, Michael Dickson:

https://www.youtube.com/live/qbViCdykqXo

22a. Bret Stephens writes a very interesting op-ed for the NY Times, about the hypocritical concept of Settler Colonialism. “It’s fine to oppose settler colonialism, but in that case, one also must be consistent and principled. To say that Israel alone must be eliminated on grounds of settler colonialism while giving a pass to other cases of settler colonialism is a double standard that is hard to describe as anything but antisemitic.”

He goes into examples of not only America, but also Australia, Canada and more. It seems Israel is the only one that should not be allowed to exist. And he explains the biggest irony of all, “It’s odd, to say the least, that the ethnic group that is today most vociferously accused of settler colonialism is the one that can unmistakably trace its language, culture and religion to the same places from which it was long exiled and now inhabits and governs.” Thank you to Melissa Chapman for making this article accessible:

https://www.instagram.com/p/C3JB79buPjS/

22b. The full article at its source, if you can access The NY Times:

https://www.nytimes.com/…/opinion/settler-colonialism.html

23. I saw something that really caught my eye, and had to dig a little, but found it to be authentic. Do you remember the terrible story in Vermont, when 3 Palestinians students were shot? The assumption was that, just as the frequent attacks on American Jews are from Hamas supporting Jew haters, likewise this was from someone Israel-supporting, and/or at the very least Muslim hating.

The truth appears bizarre. Jason Eaton was mentally ill; ok that part is unsurprising, and doesn’t preclude it from being a hate crime. However, his social media posts actually show him defending the actions of Hamas on October 7. “”What if someone occupied your country? Wouldn’t you fight them?” he wrote in a November 16 post…In an October 17 post on X responding to a different article, Eaton wrote that “the notion that Hamas is ‘evil’ for defending their state from occupation is absurd. They are owed a state. Pay up.” So the people who attack Jews defend Hamas and…so is this guy who attacked Palestinians? I don’t have all the answers, but I’m definitely finding this to be an interesting bit of information, currently not being picked up by mainstream media.

Are you telling me that Hamas supporters are attacking both Jews and Muslims abroad? That seems like a story, and less about Islamophobia and more about the hatred of Hamas supporters. Either that, or this was a random act of violence from a mentally ill man, and not a hate crime. Either way, the coverage on the case appears to be overwhelmingly lacking in critical thinking:

https://m.sevendaysvt.com/…/driven-by-hate-man-charged…

24. We’ve had the chance to talk about how intimidating and unfriendly it has been on college campuses. We’ve discussed antisemitism countless times. But rarely have we gotten true insight into the mind of a high school student, who is at the crossroads of what to do next, thanks to the situation of today. Maayan Mazar is a senior in high school, and has been utterly torn with what will feel like the right life balance for her college experience. Half of the places she was applying to, appear too unfriendly to a proud Zionist like herself. “Now that my classmates and I have started receiving our college admission decisions, seeing my friends get into certain schools has felt complicated. While I am happy for them, I know that going to some of these universities means that while they will get the branding, they likely won’t have easy experiences as Jews. I hope that those of my friends going to these schools will be able to retain their proud Jewish identities and won’t compromise or hide in order to fit in with the new, antisemitic campus climate.” It’s truly unfair that this is what teenagers have to take into account these days, when applying to college is already more than stressful enough, as many of us can still recall:

https://jewishjournal.com/…/applying-to-college-after…/

25. We really DO need to keep the Uyghur people in our minds and hearts, because so much of the world tends to let China sweep them under the rug. This population of Muslims within China, unlike Israel, has actually fit the definition of being treated genocidally, as agreed upon by both Republicans and Democrats alike. Rabbi-Shmuly Yanklowitz realizes the danger in this, and wants to mobilize Jews to help. “Let us be inspired by the Soviet Jewry movement, in which American Jewish organizations successfully created the political pressure that forced the Soviet Union to finally allow Jewish emigration. The success of this campaign showed us that as American Jews, we have political muscle. Let us use that muscle to help save the Uyghur people.”

https://jewishjournal.com/…/we-must-not-forget-the…/

26. This is getting nuts, or already has been for a long time apparently. People from the Iran’s reprehensible IRGC, are apparently finding Muslims in Iran and Iraq making pilgrimages, and trying to recruit them to spy on Jews in England and other countries. “Terrorism expert Professor Anthony Glees said: ‘This is a serious threat that needs to be addressed. IRGC is behind Hamas and the Houthis, and it is also running these spying networks here. British Iranians need to be very careful when they go back to Iran.'”

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/…/iran-british-muslims…

27. It wouldn’t feel like a complete week without another update from Hillel Neuer and UN Watch about UNRWA. Well, it turns out they have found something pretty significant. “Terror tunnel discovered right below UNRWA HQ, hiding Hamas intelligence data center, with electrical room, industrial battery power banks, living quarters for Hamas server operators. Electric cables from UNRWA powered the Hamas servers.” Nah, this organization wasn’t complicit, couldn’t be, said the most naive person on earth:

https://x.com/HillelNeuer/status/1756396240311398549

28. Rabbi Adam Kligfeld has been such a rock for us Jews since October 7th. Sending heartfelt messages to the community, raising money for different Israeli charities, and when I have had last minute speakers fall into my lap, he has found a way to make it work to host them. He’s also been traveling to Israel, and writing about his experiences.

Here he is visiting the headquarters of the Givati Brigade. “There has not been a single year since 1983, when the brigade was re-created after a hiatus, in which at least one soldier was not killed.” He sees the many names of those who are tragically lost, including the staff member’s family.

https://www.facebook.com/adam.kligfeld/posts/pfbid0G3EmfNyaHVW9VkjhdUp2J1D68NheuqKWm8osMRMwJsTwmkbyGrRFdsVUFDbuwWSZl

29a. Karen Lehrman Bloch writes a helpful cover story about OpenDor Media. You know those videos that I’ve shared from “Unpacked” (including one in this very post)? That’s a product of this educational organization; in fact it’s their largest YouTube channel. She speaks to Noam Weissman, who explains that they do this for the general public, but also to provide resources for teachers and educators, in what they call “Unpacked For Educators”.

They have a third and newest division that they call “Amplified”. It is, “to magnify the voices of other Jewish and Israel content creators and to make sure they have the tools to teach about Israel, Zionism, and Judaism. Amplified is committed to building and strengthening a community of creators so they can successfully inspire and educate more audiences about Judaism, Israel, and combating antisemitism.“ With great people contributing to their efforts, including Yirmiyahu Danzig, I certainly hope this will be a resource she’ll utilized by those who need it most:

https://jewishjournal.com/…/reinventing-education-for…/

29b. Karen writes about how ironic it is, that the ones chanting on the left against us “dirty Zionists”, are actually mimicking the right wing Neo-Nazi ideologies. “Indeed, the new White Supremacists came to their antisemitism the old-fashioned way: scapegoating their problems on us. Their great-grandfathers were no doubt part of the gangs who beat up our great-grandfathers on the Lower East Side. Those who went to college were taught that Judeans, less than 2% of the world’s population and the most persecuted minority throughout history, are hyper-privileged, oppressors, and neo-colonizers.”

I will add that I noticed the same thing happen during Covid-19, but in reverse. The classic anti-vaccine movement was most typically on the far left, so when the new version of anti-vaxx protests occurred, they were mostly those on the right, ironically joining the ideology of those on the far left. Now we see the same happening in reverse. Apparently the pendulum swings full circle, and in both directions. Which on a personal note, between my vaccine education during Covid, and my Israel education now, is why I have likely lost friends on both the right and the left over the last few years. Ain’t life grand:

https://jewishjournal.com/…/the-other-white-supremacists/

VIDEOS:

1. Sometimes I find an old video or article, and it is as meaningful now as it would have been fresh. Though you watch it through different eyes. Unpacked takes you through the ways that October 7 actually brought Israel closer together than in years. I’ll admit, some of it is outdated, as lots has happened since this was released, and the government has been criticized plenty by the people since then. However, the main idea remains, that everyone from the protesters to Israeli Arabs gathered and joined up to fight the crucial fight.

My favorite new bit of info was about the Iron Sisters, a group of Haredi women doing their parts for the war. Bonus points go to the property tax department that stopped calling people for money, and were just checking up on how everyone was. It might be a fractious situation worldwide, and Israelis may be divided over Netanyahu’s government, but being united in eradicating Hamas and bringing the hostages home is not a question for Israel as a whole:

https://youtu.be/Wib2FedT2hA

2. I loved this news story, and I’ll admit I welled up with tears a few times. They interviewed dozens of kids who are survivors of kibbutz Be’eri, focusing on a bunch who speak to the journalist. They tell you what they miss the most (family members who died or have been taken hostage, their beds, their schools, their friends, their home cooked meals). They have been to countless funerals. They are bored at their temporary schools. They want to go home. It’s both a heartbreaking and heartwarming watch.

Bonus points come towards the end, when the little kids actually share opinions criticizing the Israeli government:

https://youtu.be/V72yTgtRgo0

3. To be totally honest, self-help type motivational speeches are just not my thing. I recognize the good they do for people who need that boost in morale or self-worth, but they mostly just make me internally roll my eyes, as a gut reaction. In spite of myself, I found myself appreciating what Eitan Chitayat did here.

As hard as the years of Covid were for all of us (to varying degrees), it literally shaped the lives of kids who changed their socialization, and learning, all in their formative years. And now for those who are in Israel, AND for those who are proud Jews everywhere else, life goes from out of the frying pan of Covid, into the fire of Jew hatred. It’s a lot to bear, too much for many. Eitan gives a pep talk as a result, explaining that we have gone through millennias of this in our history, and we WILL overcome once again. And they WILL be alright:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C0rUW08tcqQ/

4. “I shout my Zionism” is repeated by numerous Jews of Color, and it’s truly special and heartwarming to watch. We are not a country nor a tribe of white oppressors, we are made up of everyone, and have millennia of countless targeted oppression behind us, and it isn’t going away. We are in this together. Thank you Zioness:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C0SE4wNPz2h/

5a. I loved watching this interview with Shawn Eni. And not just because his voice sounds almost exactly like Mark Ruffalo, which I couldn’t get out of my head throughout.

Visegrad24, which is run by Stefan Tompson, does this great interview with the man behind so much of the sharp comedy we need right now on social media. Shawn Eni runs the very popular The Mossad: Satirical, Yet Awesome account (@TheMossadIL) on Twitter/X. When asked if he knows the people behind the hilarious Gaza Ministry of Health account (@GazaHealth) he shocked me by laughing and saying… “Yes, that’s also me”! So he’s the man behind the magic in both places. And I’ve shared hilarity from both accounts before. And no doubt will many times again.

What’s really worth watching, is the amount of care Shawn takes with trying to educate the public. Humor breaks through walls that no other format can, and it still can get the point across. In fact some of his posts are not even humorous, because he realizes there’s a time and place for it. I truly have a deeper appreciation for the satire accounts, and the man behind the curtain:

https://youtu.be/7V-OobjsQ-c

5b. This is a perfect example of how not everything is just humor. This “exchange” with Hamas uses sarcasm to make a strong point, that no matter what is offered, the missing ingredient in naive people is that one side simply doesn’t want Israel to exist:

https://twitter.com/TheMossadIL/status/1755709225366413800

6a. Wow! The owner of the New England Patriots, Robert Kraft, on the phone with the speechwriter for MLK, Dr. Clarence Jones, telling him that he will be airing a commercial of him standing up to Jewish hatred DURING THE SUPERBOWL. It isn’t the money being spent that impresses me, he’s a billionaire, but the stance being that public, going to the biggest audience of the year in this country, knowing there will be tons of trolls, protests, and “what about” replaces. Holy cow:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C3Ft086u8o-/

6b. Dr. Clarence Jones saying that “there’s no way in hell we would have been successfully passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, or the Voting Rights Act of 1965, but for the 24/7 support of the Jewish community”!

https://twitter.com/StandUp2Je…/status/1756332656738877748

7. Adar Weinreb is an Israeli peace activist, who has a YouTube channel called Sulha. He has long-form debates and discussions about Judaism and Israel, with people across the spectrum, including White Supremecists, Palestinians, Zionists and Anti-zionists. His discussions are always in good faith (on his side), even if I disagree or find fault with his information, sources, or conclusions.

In this 2.5 hour (!) video, he debates Joseph Cohen, of UK’s Israel Advocacy Movement, about whether or not Israel is using excessive force in Gaza. Joseph does a fantastic job representing a pro-Israel stance, which I have been transparent about agreeing with in this very column. Surprisingly, Adar seems to accept Hamas’ accounting of their death statistics, and even claims that according to Israeli records, only one baby was killed October 7th (but he does accept the rest of the atrocities).

There are other uncomfortable parts of the debate, but it is worth noting how rare these days it is to see a (mostly) polite debate on Gaza, of two well-informed and well-intentioned people in good faith, who will admit what they don’t know, and be willing to check back later. It’s so important to read, watch and listen to things that come from outside our echo chamber, but what makes it intolerable is how rude the dialogue generally is. So it’s refreshing to watch two people have what we should always have in an ideal world, good intentions, and polite discourse. Thank you to both men for doing so:

https://www.youtube.com/live/Kj8DoKObASE

8. This is phenomenal A+ worth your time viewing. Bari Weiss sat down in Tel Aviv with Lucy Aharish, and you feel absolutely mesmerized listening to every word. Lucy is part of the 20% of Israel which is Israeli Arab, and has risen to stardom as a TV journalist. She doesn’t hold back with both her love and frustrations with her country. She grew up as the only Arab family in an Israeli town, and although she did experience racism, she and her family refused to let her feel like a victim.

She goes into detail about the day she was 5 years old, and her family was injured by a terrorist attack, and how she spent years of her life despising the Palestinians as a result. She tells about the pushback she got from parts of the Religious Right when she married the Jewish actor Tsahi Halevi from “Fauda”. And she certainly goes into great detail about October 7, and says that it took her months after that day for her to regain any compassion for Gazans, which was one of the evil goals of Hamas.

It’s a wonderful interview, an intimate conversation, brutally honest, and I can understand and empathize with everything she feels, as it truly represents not just how an Israeli Arab might feel, but how much of Israel is feeling. Because that’s who and what she is, and what most Israeli Arabs identify as the last few months. An Israeli. Full stop:

https://youtu.be/8LIcd7wHlCE

9. Hillel Fuld shares a simple animated short that exemplifies the frustrating struggles of Israel. Get attacked, don’t respond. Get attacked, respond and be villified. Round and round and round we go:

https://twitter.com/HilzFuld/status/1756560283848282367

SPOTLIGHT:

I’m a bit late to the party with Montana Tucker, but I’m really proud of her! She speaks up about antisemitism, the Holocaust, and the hostages that need to be released. She has millions of followers, and tries to be a good influencer, even proudly wearing a Bring Them Home dress to the Grammys. She also visited Auschwitz, and released a series of shorts on the topic, and often talks about her grandparents who went through it. Bravo and thank you Montana:

The video of her visit to Poland (not divided into shorts):

https://youtu.be/QsG3tjArrMc

Her amazing dress and statement at the Grammys recently:

https://fb.watch/q2OFe1Dmg-/?mibextid=I6gGtw

Follow her here:

https://www.instagram.com/montanatucker

https://x.com/montanatucker

https://www.facebook.com/MontanaTucker

FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION:

Maman is one I had read about months ago in the Jewish Journal, and it really came in handy! When my sisters-in-law Karin and Rikki contacted Adi and myself about their planning to put together an incredible retreat for over a hundred survivors of Nova, an immediate idea that came to mind was Maman. This organization has helped so many people, and how wonderful to get this moment of joy from the retreat, along with Niva Harel singing:

https://www.instagram.com/p/C3MQeWUrU7F/

“Our mission at Maman is to provide mother-like support to families and individuals in our community and beyond experiencing a challenging time. Maman offers hands-on assistance as well as emotional and practical support to help these families through their hardship. We show up with Mama-bear fierceness and motherly tenderness. Maman is 100% volunteer and community based.”

To donate or learn more:

https://www.mamannonprofit.com/

ON A LIGHTER NOTE:

1. This is so perfectly stupid, great job to The Daily Brine again. Cheetos lol:

https://www.instagram.com/p/C2-ureatZUl/

2. Mwahaha, UNRWA, you deserve this savage one:

https://twitter.com/The…/status/1753096129510551586

3. My friend L.E. Staiman not only does sketch comedy, which I’ve shared before, but he sings for The Groggers. And he’s mixed the music with the comedy, with this play on Simple Plan’s “I’m Just A Kid”, with the song “I’m Just A Yid”. And I can assure you, the lyrics are actually topical. Palestine, the BBC, it all gets brought into it. Nicely done!

https://youtu.be/GMdTlUxUtZk

BUT WAIT, THERE’S MORE!

1. A tribute to a talented soldier who died in December. Aviva Klompas lets the world know about Shaul Greenglick, who auditioned for “Israel’s Next Star” so soon before his death. The clip of his song with photographs in the background, pay beautiful tribute to one lost far too young:

https://twitter.com/AvivaKlompas/status/1755171189088047496

2. Thank you to the original Iron Man. Ozzy Osbourne doesn’t want to have any association with the mentally ill antisemite Ye/Kanye, and denied him use of his song as a result. Thank you to Aviva Klompas as always, for finding us these great stories:

https://twitter.com/AvivaKlompas/status/1756062787749495183

3. This week I reached out to a trusted contact, to see if there was a reliable place to find victims of terror in Israel, and this seems to be a pretty great resource. The Jewish Virtual Library. It does not include IDF soldiers, and tries to not over-estimate:

https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/comprehensive…

4a. Pretty big news. Avichai Adrei, the IDF Spokesman of Arab media, announced that a so-called journalist from Al Jazeera had his laptop recovered, and found with ample evidence of him working hand in hand with Hamas. We already knew that news came via Qatar, and very friendly to Hamas, but this is a whole new ballgame of bad:

https://twitter.com/AvichayAdraee/status/1756738831741595716

4b. Ori Miller and Eitan Fischberger continued the thread by finding even more photographic evidence of this:

https://twitter.com/orielisham…/status/1756736843452744157

https://twitter.com/EFischberger/status/1756773005328302544

4c. Alex Zeldin makes a great point that I’ll entirely copy here, “UNRWA, Gaza Health Ministry, and now Al Jazeera all showing fresh evidence of direct involvement with Hamas. All of these continue to be used as credible sources of information by western publications. Why?” Yes. This:

https://twitter.com/JewishWonk/status/1756755888122044809

WHAT I’M ENJOYING THIS WEEK:

It was for the saddest of reasons, when our beautiful friend Barry Poltorak was taken from this world far too young, and far too soon; but it was wonderful being able to spend significant quality time with my sister Abigail, and our friend Kelila in town as a result.

Me with my bestie Kevin in Israel, exploring the beautiful caves of Beit Guvrin, while our babies explored the earth.

Boaz Hepner works as a Registered Nurse in Saint John’s Health Center. He moonlights as a columnist, where his focuses are on health, and Israel, including his Chosen Links section of the Journal. He is a Pico/Robertson native, and lives here with his wife Adi, and children Natalia and Liam. He can be found with his family enjoying his passions: his multitude of friends, movies, poker and traveling.

Chosen Links – February 11, 2024 Read More »

Rosner’s Domain | The UNRWA Obstacle

Like all things, books have their peak moment. For many of them, it is when they are published. For others, like “The War of Return” by Einat Wilf and Adi Schwartz, it is now, four years after publication.

The book hasn’t changed since it was written, neither did reality. But we did. We changed on Oct. 7th, when the tolerable UNRWA became intolerable. Ask Wilf and Schwartz, and they will tell you it was intolerable for a long time; they will tell you it is Israel’s fault – to some degree – that this organization, an agency charged with finding a solution for Palestinian refugees still operates, when a fourth or a fifth generation of supposed refugees is growing up. UNRWA is not a problem solver, it is a problem exacerbator. This happens to many organizations: The cause must be kept alive lest the organization becomes obsolete. For UNRWA, keeping the cause alive means a simple thing:  never solving the Palestinian refugee problem.

There are two problems with UNRWA, one of which became evident in the last two to three weeks, as more reports about UNRWA employees, involvement in the October massacre and more evidence of UNRWA employees’ assistance to Hamas came out. There’s evidence in almost all UNRWA facilities: a tunnel beneath an office, a stash of ammunition or cash, a person who guards hostages, all courtesy of this U.N.-sponsored human rights organization.

This current problem is the result of the original sin, the original problem. As UNRWA became entrenched, its mission was no longer to settle the refugees and their sons, grandsons, great-grandsons, great-great-grandsons, but rather to keep their dream of “going home” alive. That is, to keep a sinister and disruptive vision for the Palestinians, one in which Israel somehow ceases to exist as the millions of supposed exiled Palestinians go back to places that were resettled decades ago by other people.

Such a vision should not come as great surprise, because UNRWA is an international organization by name and funding only. It gets its allocations from a naïve, or baleful, world, it draws its legitimacy from being an agent of the international community. But in fact, it is a Palestinian organization funded by outsiders. Other than a few foreigners in managerial positions, almost all UNRWA employees are Palestinians. In Gaza, they are Gazans, and, in most cases, supporters of Hamas. They get their salaries from you — Americans, or Canadians, or Norwegians — and they work for Yahya Sinwar, a coldblooded killer and a master of violence. They work for him in two ways: as perpetrators of terrorism, or perpetrators of hate.

Note this: When UNRWA takes care of schools and medicine in Gaza, all expenses are paid by you. It’s not because there’s no money in Gaza to fund these activities; it is because Hamas takes that money and uses it for other purposes, such as arming itself, digging tunnels, firing rockets. UNRWA is an agency whose work gets Hamas off the hook of having to provide for the population of Gaza. Hamas is engaged in violence, while UNRWA keeps the people of Gaza fed, clothed and schooled. That’s a convenient arrangement for all parties involved. Hamas has free hands to do what it wants to do, UNRWA has a mission that keeps it viable. All this is well known and documented. You can read all about it in the above-mentioned book. There’s no news – except for the fact that we were suddenly made to realize that UNRWA is not a nuisance, it is a threat that must be dealt with. It is a threat that should be eliminated along with Hamas rule. There are less corrupt and less political aid agencies that can replace UNRWA, such as USAID, the World Food Program, and other groups that already have functioning operations in certain Palestinian areas.

The most eager supporters of this decision – to eliminate UNRWA – ought to be those who want to someday see a cure for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The cure will not come when the world funds an organization whose main activity is to keep a wound open, to preach the gospel of victimhood, to educate the next generation of people with no dream other than the destruction of other people’s homes and country. That this organization is also swarmed with terrorist supportive employees is not a bug, but a feature. You can’t run an army by staffing it with pacificists, you can’t run a school by staffing it with illiterates, you can’t run an orchestra by staffing it with only deaf persons – and you can’t run an UNRWA believing that its workers will be a peace-loving, solution-seeking, peace-promoting bunch.

So, as they say, don’t let a crisis go to waste. Winning the war and keeping UNRWA would be a wasteful thing to do.

Something I wrote in Hebrew

Time for an election? There are signs that the public is losing patience.

The moment Gantz retires, with the Kaplan St. protesters already in the streets, will be the decisive moment. This is the moment that will connect those who still cling to the government because they feel there’s no other choice, and those who never wanted it and have long since given up on it. Let’s call them by names: supporters of the Gantz party and supporters of the Lapid party. The former do not yet take to the streets, and do not yet want elections. They are waiting for a sign. But one should not mistake them: They are really waiting for him, and assume that he will come. They want the government to go at the right moment in their eyes. When will he come? Some say “In the fall,” meaning, probably, October, or November 2024. Some say, right after Gantz quits.

A week’s numbers

Note that in this new JPPI poll, a majority supports an election by the coming fall.

A reader’s response:

Andy Cohen asks: “Do Israelis still consider President Biden supportive?” My answer: They do, but suspicion that he might not be as supportive as they thought begins to creep in. 


Shmuel Rosner is senior political editor. For more analysis of Israeli and international politics, visit Rosner’s Domain at jewishjournal.com/rosnersdomain.

Rosner’s Domain | The UNRWA Obstacle Read More »

Are Bibi and Biden Heading for a Showdown?

Joe Biden wants a two-state solution and it appears that his patience is quickly running out. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu obviously wants no such thing. But he now sees Biden’s growing pressure as a way to remain in office even after the war ends. Which of these two old and experienced politicians prevails will determine Israel’s future.

Biden has clearly had it. For years, his “I love you, Bibi, but I don’t agree with a damn thing you say” one-liner has allowed the president to maneuver past many serious disagreements between the two men. But a demonstrably peeved Biden is no longer bothering to soft-pedal his disatisfaction. During a recent news conference in which he was already in a bad mood after defending himself against a special counsel’s allegation that his memory is failing, he used his harshest language toward the Jewish state than at any time since Oct. 7.

Biden referred to Israeli military conduct as “over the top” and then went on to say: “A lot of innocent people are starving. A lot of innocent people are in trouble and dying. And it’s got to stop.” He followed up a few days later in his first conversation with Netanyahu in almost a month by warning the Israeli prime minister that he should not go ahead with the planned action in the southern Gaza city of Rafah without a specific plan for providing for the safety of civilians in that area. In the first weeks after the initial Hamas attacks, the two men spoke every few days. But as their objectives have grown apart and the disagreement between them has grown, Biden has been content to let his advisors convey his dissatisfaction. The Rafah flashpoint has raised his ire to a point where he believed that a more direct rebuke was necessary.

The operation in southern Gaza represents a particularly acrimonious clash between Biden and Netanyahu. Biden now faces increasing pressure from the political left in this country to the point where it could potentially threaten his reelection, and he has found a number of ways to express his displeasure with Netanyahu’s approach to the war. The president has issued executive orders aimed at ensuring that countries receiving U.S. military support commit to providing humanitarian assistance (a veiled caution flag toward Israel) and sanctioning four West Bank settlers for violence against Palestinians. The sanctions in particular clearly angered Netanyahu, who then complained about the decision directly to Biden.

The White House has also been frustrated by Netanyahu’s approach to the hostage negotiations, feeling that he has undermined U.S. efforts by dismissing the talks too quickly. But these are just the preliminaries: the major test of American-Israeli ties is yet to come. Biden has long believed in the necessity of a two-state solution and his administration has been increasingly vocal in their discussions of the preconditions for a Palestinian state. However, the president has not yet raised the volume on this option to the degree that will be necessary to pressure Israel to more seriously consider such an option. That may be about to change.

The Gaza war has taken on almost symbolic value to Biden’s progressive detractors, who seem to be channeling their frustration with the president’s pace of action on immigration policy, climate change, police reform and other liberal priorities into far more confrontational protest against him on the Middle East. Biden needs these voters in November, and since he is not about to abandon Israel altogether, a two-state solution might give him the ability to square that political circle.

But Netanyahu, whose poll numbers have dropped precipitously since Oct. 7, clearly sees a significant political benefit in being seen by the Israeli people as leading the resistance to an international call for a Palestinian state. More than three-quarters of war-scarred Israelis oppose a two-state solution, and Netanyahu regards his leadership of that opposition as a key to his political survival.

Neither Biden nor Netanyahu has any interest in leaving office anytime soon. But each of their paths to political survival may now require the defeat of the other.

Neither Biden nor Netanyahu has any interest in leaving office anytime soon. But each of their paths to political survival may now require the defeat of the other.


Dan Schnur is the U.S. Politics Editor for the Jewish Journal. He teaches courses in politics, communications, and leadership at UC Berkeley, USC and Pepperdine. He hosts the monthly webinar “The Dan Schnur Political Report” for the Los Angeles World Affairs Council & Town Hall. Follow Dan’s work at www.danschnurpolitics.com.

Are Bibi and Biden Heading for a Showdown? Read More »

On Losing Faith in Peace

Standing on a Tel Aviv street corner at six in the morning in the pouring rain, I had never felt less hopeful about the future. That’s the thing about cold, dark, wet mornings. They make a pessimist out of you, which made the day’s plan — attending a pro-peace conference in Haifa — feel all the more onerous and absurd. 

It had been my partner’s idea to go. For the past few months, he has been eagerly following the social media accounts of “Standing Together,” a Jewish-Arab grassroots peace movement that has been growing in popularity since the war started. 

I decided to join him for one simple reason: I want the war to end. I want our hostages returned to their homes. I want our soldiers returned to their families. I want the nightmare of death and displacement faced by innocent Palestinians in Gaza to be over. I want the residents of Israel’s southern and northern towns to be able to return to their homes without fear of rocket attacks, anti-tank missiles, or invasions. I want mothers — both Palestinian and Jewish — to know that their children are safe. 

And so, knowing that Standing Together stands for all these goals, I registered for the event. To my surprise, when I did so, I discovered that I was already a member. Moreover, I have been donating eighteen shekels to the organization each month for the past few years without realizing it. I tried to remember when I signed up, but it evaded me.

By the time we arrived in Haifa, the sun was out, which gave us a burst of energy. The conference center was lively and crowded. We saw soldiers in uniform, women wearing hijabs, religious and secular Jews — all mingling together for the common cause of peace and a better future. 

But while the crowd was high on energy, the speakers were low on substance. They talked about ending the war, but had as little to say about the day after the war as Netanyahu. What mattered to them was that the fighting stopped, but no one had anything to say about the inevitable implications of an immediate ceasefire. Would Hamas return to power? Would they start planning their next Oct. 7? Would the people of the Gaza envelope be able to return to their homes? Would we just end up in another war in two years? 

Nothing. Just vague calls for “a new way forward.”

Former Joint List MK Dov Khenin spoke enthusiastically about the need for an “all for all” deal, which would mean setting free every single Palestinian prisoner — including many of the terrorists who committed the October 7th atrocities—in exchange for the return of Israeli hostages.

Now, this may indeed be a worthwhile price to pay in order to rescue the hostages, but it’s nevertheless a devastating price that involves letting depraved murderers escape justice. Let us not forget that the architect of Oct. 7, Yahya Sinwar, was released from an Israeli prison in a deal to secure the release of Gilad Shalit. A word of acknowledgement about this heavy cost would have been welcome, but Hanin championed the “all for all” deal as though it were a shiny prize to be won, rather than a grim reality to be accepted. 

Most shocking of all was the invocation of the case brought against Israel by South Africa at the International Court of Justice at The Hague. Rather than denouncing this act of lawfare, the speakers lamented that The Hague didn’t grant South Africa’s request for a ceasefire.

“The Hague won’t save us,” said one speaker. “We must save ourselves.” 

I left feeling uninspired.

I don’t remember when I signed up to become a monthly donor to Standing Together, but I can imagine why I did it. I did it because I believe in peace and equality and because I’m desperate for Israel to have a future that isn’t defined by war and strife and controversy. Most of all, I did it because I believed such a future was possible.

Apparently I’ve stopped believing. 

Part of it has to do with what I’ve seen Hamas do. 

Part of it, however, has to do with what I’ve heard the peace camp say … or not say. 

If ending the war immediately means leaving Hamas in power, is that really a pro-peace policy? 

If creating a Palestinian state means watching the West Bank devolve into another Gaza, is that really a pro-peace policy?

No one at Standing Together articulated anything like a real vision for how to create the future they’re calling for. And so, even though the sun had come out, I returned to Tel Aviv as pessimistic as I had been in the morning. 

Perhaps, but no one at Standing Together articulated anything like a real vision for how to create the future they’re calling for. And so, even though the sun had come out, I returned to Tel Aviv as pessimistic as I had been in the morning. 

Nevertheless, I decided not to cancel my monthly donation. Though I’ve lost hope right now, I’m thankful that there are those out there who haven’t.


Matthew Schultz is a Jewish Journal columnist and rabbinical student at Hebrew College. He is the author of the essay collection “What Came Before” (Tupelo, 2020) and lives in Boston and Jerusalem.  

On Losing Faith in Peace Read More »

Ten Trends That Are Reshaping American Judaism

On these pages and elsewhere, I have had occasion to comment on the transformation now underway involving American Judaism, impacting both its substance and style. No doubt, the unfolding events of October 7th will alter some of these projections.

In framing this analysis, I posed three core questions:

  • What will we look like?
  • How and why are we changing?
  • What does all of this mean?

With reference to the first of these, here is what I am observing:

As part of the evolution of 21st-century Judaism, we are likely to experience the upending of the concept of “one Jewish community.” Our cultural and ethnic diversity, our competing political interests and distinctive views concerning Israel, as well as our diverse religious practices will each contribute to forging multiple, individualized and competing expressions of American Judaism. We will become a community of communities. Absent a shared consensus, Jews will experience a decline in political influence.

We are likely to see power shifts take place within our communal system as various institutions will lose some of their financial and political clout as members and donors shift priority and focus. Will the current focus on Israel, now central to Jewish concerns, be maintained, and what central policy questions and institutional priorities will likely drive the next iteration of Jewish activism? We should note that while crisis generates consensus, the capacity of a community to hold such a shared space quickly vanishes. 

The generational imprint will be significant and transformative, as we are likely to experience the end of such core operational elements as dues-affiliation-membership and even denominationalism. As Gen Z and Millennial generations replace older constituencies, alternative structural models will emerge. 

In connection with both the 2008 Economic Recession and more recently, COVID, we will observe the continuation of the homebased work arrangements and the outmigration from large metropolitan centers by a significant number of Jews, impacting specifically the Bay Area, Metropolitan New York and Southern California. This redistribution of population will likely continue and will have an ongoing impact on Jewish communal organizing, including a decline in membership and the corresponding downsizing of financial support involving various institutions.

Ever since the pandemic, communal leaders have acknowledged the growing mental health challenges facing the Jewish community. Certainly October 7th has generated additional levels of stress, depression and trauma. Our Jewish professionals are reporting higher cases of burn out and work-place tensions over these past four years.

How and Why Are We Changing?

As with the broader society, four core elements are driving many of the changes we are and will be monitoring. These include generational and demographic factors, the rise and impact of new technologies, the reality of economics, and the changing cultural and social environment in which we will find ourselves.

Serving non-binary Jews, Jews of color, and “unchurched” individuals will be among the new constituencies we will see entering our institutions. This heightened awareness of diversity and inclusion is contributing to the reshaping of Jewish communal and institutional life. Correspondingly, distinctive generational differences regarding identity and affiliation will also contribute to the redefining American Judaism.

Access to virtual Jewish platforms will need to be available to our constituencies as part of the changing culture of choice. Organizations and synagogues will continue to account for those pockets of members who are opting for a virtual Jewish connection. In some cases, we are identifying a new category of Jewish “virtual seekers” who are joining national and even international platforms of worship and learning, opting to move away from holding local affiliation in favor of embracing such national synagogue models. Living in a culture that emphasizes “choice,” “individualism,” and the “Culture of Free” will require institutions to offer a multiplicity of opportunities to appeal to the tastes and priorities of Gen Z and millennial participants. Among the generational outcomes here will be a renewed focus on spiritualism, a growing attention to cultural Judaism, and a renewed commitment to community organizing.

With reference to institutional performance, we note that while there is some expansion, especially among some of our mega-institutions, we note the continued downsizing among smaller and some intermediate organizations/synagogues. Mergers and closures are a much more common phenomenon, and such trends are expected to continue. Questions have arisen concerning the significant number of liberal religious seminaries and denominational institutions that serve an increasingly shrinking membership base. Economic issues, especially escalating operating costs, a declining membership base, and serving smaller and older family units encompass some of these challenges. Twenty-first-century institutions will require multiple funding platforms if they are to survive and flourish. With the likely disappearance of dues models and membership fees, a variety of alternative income streams will be essential.

The impact of antisemitism is both real and challenging. Personal as well as institutional security now becomes paramount. Congregants and community activists are expressing concerns about their safety in public Jewish spaces. Associated with this current acceleration in hate has been an increased interest on the part of parents to move their youngsters to safer educational options. 

What Does All of This Mean?

Institutions of all dimensions are exploring alternative ways to “deliver” their messages and “provide” programs. Even as we still find aspects of competition, there is a heightened awareness in this age of declining resources and the downsizing institutions in focusing on consultative and collaborative models of communal practice and shared opportunities for participation.

We also note that many institutions are committed to developing different delivery systems in order to serve members and reach new constituencies. Renewed attention to small gatherings, a part of the privatized, individualized focus we are experiencing will drive the redistribution of institutional resources. With Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, we are also seeing a significant transformation in whom we are serving, and how they may seek to relate to the Jewish community.

There is a renewed focus on professionals, and possibly of engaging paraprofessionals, as we encounter the downsizing of voluntarism. How we best deploy our professionals will be a critical factor in managing 21st-century Jewish delivery systems. With the absence of person power to handle many of the core tasks assigned to volunteers, how will professionals reimagine their priorities? 

Throughout history, Jews have been dependent upon their leaders to help frame the next great set of ideas. Today, we are missing such thought leaders who can shape a new American Jewish vision and agenda. With the events surrounding October 7th, our communal system will require a cadre of Jewish leaders, operating both inside of our community and outside, who can help envision and execute new and innovative organizing models.

There will be the need to provide safe spaces for essential conversations for Jews who are seeking to connect. Such topics, as Israel, antisemitism, American politics, and the future of Judaism will be on the docket. A significant portion of this will need to be inter-generational as we uncover the significant divides and perceptions among us regarding how we view issues through different historical, political and demographic lenses.

Closing Thoughts

What we are observing within the Jewish community is not unique, as mainline Protestantism and other faith constituencies also face such challenges today. The pace and intensity of downsizing appears to be more significant elsewhere, possibly providing some helpful insights and learning experiences for us, as we encounter such transitions.

As the Jewish communal order undergoes striking changes, how Jewish life will be altered remains an open-ended issue. What we anticipate is a period of experimentation, where multiple models of organizing and programming will be introduced along with alternative designs in affiliation and engagement.

Two ingredients will directly impact this momentum of change, the space that Israel will occupy in reshaping Jewish identity and practice and the role that antisemitism will have in influencing how we will respond. No doubt, the economy will drive the pace and scope of community building. And finally, culture and technology will play essential roles, the former in shaping ideas and content, while the latter in providing the various delivery mechanisms essential for attracting audiences.

American Judaism will continue to reflect the broader imprint of societal trends, just as it continues to be responsive to internal Jewish priorities.


Dr. Steven Windmueller is Emeritus Professor of Jewish Communal Studies at HUC-JIR, Los Angeles. His writings can be found on his website, www.thewindreport.com.

Ten Trends That Are Reshaping American Judaism Read More »

Welcome to Gotham

Welcome to Gotham. If you look up into the gloomy sky, you will notice the Bat Signal. Yes, it’s meant for the Caped Crusader, and not the Wuhan Lab. 

Unfortunately, we’ve beamed it every night for the past several years. A crime wave has been crashing down on our once serene city on the Hudson. The menace in the air is palpable.

So far no superhero has answered the call. It might be that Batman is ill-equipped for this particular crop of villains, all operating in a culture that has a problem with accountability — especially when it comes to certain groups. Surely Bruce Wayne already suffers from enough childhood trauma to be called a racist as an adult.

Rumor has it the Batman has long abandoned Gotham for Florida, as so many other industrialists have done as crime and illegal immigration have soared. Batman’s new cave is a condo in Coco Beach where he can be found playing pickleball with the regulars. 

Actually, rumor has it the Batman has long abandoned Gotham for Florida, as so many other industrialists have done as crime and illegal immigration have soared. Batman’s new cave is a condo in Coco Beach where he can be found playing pickleball with the regulars. 

Over 170,000 migrants from the southern border have settled in New York City this past year alone — over 11 million in total now reside in the United States. We know very little about many of them, or their whereabouts. Most occupy homeless shelters, school gymnasiums, hotels, tent cities, office buildings, and public streets. A good number arrived with impressive rap sheets that instantly proved the obvious: Unlike doctors and lawyers, it’s easy for criminals from foreign countries to adapt their skills in America. 

Smash-and-grab vandals prowl Fifth and Madison Avenues. Some are graduates of the rogue faction of the Black Lives Matter movement; others are undocumented and not especially interested in anyone’s life. 

A week ago, a group of illegal immigrants ganged up on two policemen. The other day a shoplifting teenager in Times Square fired his gun at a New York City police officer, accidentally shooting a tourist. Men and women in blue are longing for those less hazardous days of merely “defunding,” rather than pummeling, the police. 

There have been an estimated 62 recent grand larcenies, all caused by a crew of moped-riding migrants snatching cell phones and purses from elderly New Yorkers, sometimes dragging them along the street.

No matter who they are or the scope of their criminality, soon after being apprehended, they rejoin the ranks of repeat offenders. Unlike the countries from which they come, America regards jail time as an archaic concept. It goes well beyond merely “broken” law enforcement and immigration systems: It’s bedlam and anarchy, writ large. Prosecutors in many urban areas simply refuse to punish those who break the law. Even worse, they aren’t even held in custody. Keeping tabs on criminals, apparently, intrudes on their privacy. 

First they’re paroled into the country; and later they’re released into the neighborhood of unsuspecting, law-abiding Americans. Offenders skip down courthouse steps and flash America the finger. Many falsely claim asylum, then hopscotch from one sanctuary city to the next, never to be seen from again until they commit another crime. A sanctuary city is now a euphemism for a lawless city. 

What’s the point of having grandmothers remove their shoes and undergo body scans at airports if anyone can simply cross the Rio Grande toting waterproof backpacks stuffed with fentanyl or harboring jihadist ambitions?

America isn’t faring much better with domestic crime. Mobs burn down police precincts and cars. Pro-Hamas demonstrators clog traffic, forcibly occupy bridges, museums, and train stations, turn universities into antisemitic petri dishes, threatening Jews and calling for the annihilation of Israel. Never before has the United States seen such openly seething, shameless, and ignorant displays of antisemitic hate. One protestor identified both the “River” and “Sea” that must be liberated from the Jews as Lake Michigan.

What’s really happening nowadays is straight out of the anti-racist, woke-soaked,white skin-stained handbook: the comeuppance of the privileged class. The best antidote to racial inequality and disparities in Black achievement is a redefinition of equity and a browning of America. 

During the George Floyd rioting where the police were ordered to stand down, a Jewish city councilwoman in Minneapolis smugly proclaimed that it’s high time white people finally experience the vulnerability of being unprotected by the police.

On college campuses students have been indoctrinated into a black-and-white worldview that worships whatever is Black and detests anything that smacks of white privilege. America has never been a force for good, decrees the 1619 Project. In the new course curriculum, Jew-hating has become an official major, one that apparently doesn’t require classroom attendance in order to graduate with a 4.0. Resisting oppression, chanting slogans, pumping fists, and handing out leaflets are today’s scholarly pursuits. A UCLA professor was suspended and nearly terminated for refusing to grade his Black students more leniently after the murder of George Floyd.

One of the reasons behind the reforms that dispensed with bail is the optics of disproportionately large African-American prison populations. Progressive prosecutors in New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Philadelphia simply believe that justice demands paring it down.

Instead, everyone is looking for a Norwegian with a Ph.D. in computer science who crashes our border and then instantly shoplifts. That guy is going to jail forever. 

What no one will say is that these past four years of border negligence will prove to be a boon for the Democratic Party, who have discovered the secret sauce to winning elections: flooding the nation with absentee, mail-in ballots. Millions will be printed to reflect America’s significantly enlarged population. Many ballots will be returned, some without signature verification, as a reward to politicians who aided in increasing the voter rolls. 

Call it the Democratic Party’s Asylum Strategy — those escaping from other lands will come to the rescue of anti-racist Democrats at the ballot box. Questioning the legitimacy of those ballots will be prima facie evidence of racism — and I say that as a lifelong Democrat. 

I understand that America is a nation of immigrants. I, myself, am only a first-generation American. The base of the Statute of Liberty welcomes “your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.” I fear that today’s masses bypass Ellis Island and Border Patrol checkpoints, yearning not to breathe, but to destroy our freedoms.

You never know. Illegal migrants might surprise us yet; and citizens devoting themselves to a life of crime might change their ways. Against all odds, one could end up curing cancer.

And you can call me the Joker.


Thane Rosenbaum is a novelist, essayist, law professor and Distinguished University Professor at Touro University, where he directs the Forum on Life, Culture & Society. He is the legal analyst for CBS News Radio. His most recent book is titled “Saving Free Speech … From Itself.” 

Welcome to Gotham Read More »

Freedom for extremism or freedom from extremism? Critical problems with the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom

Against the backdrop of over 100 days of war between Israel and the terror organization Hamas, a report issued by the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) provides chilling insight into factors that have enabled Hamas and similar terror groups across the globe for decades. 

But it is hardly the kind of insight we might or should expect. A mix of negligence, ignorance and duplicity have resulted in what is nothing short of a scandal. 

USCIRF was born in 1988, following the passing of the Religious Freedom Act by Congress, and the appointment of a U.S. Ambassador on International Religious Freedom, with an adjoining commission that serves as the global watchdog, informing and issuing recommendations to the U.S. State Department on religious freedom issues taking place across the globe. 

The “watch” lists issued by the commission categorize countries identified as some degree of oppressive. The commission, staffed by no more than 15 officials of varied experience, are responsible for addressing these questions for the entire world. 

Upon his resignation and statement of dissent regarding annual recommendations in 2017, USCIRF committee Vice Chair James J. Zogby pointed to the quality of research used to inform the designations and recommendations as a crisis of ethics, where the commission staff  recommendations were based solely on murky sources. Included in multiple recommendations on Muslim nations in Central Asia is information derived solely from a self-described Christian organization based in Norway. The majority of information that informs these vital reports is copy and pasted from unvetted third parties, with particularly limited, if any in most cases, engagement between the commission team and the nations they have scrutinized. Zogby claims that “The commission’s staff is forced to write their drafts based largely on secondary sources or accounts from advocacy groups or the results of a few three- or four-day trips commissioners take each year to some of the countries. After receiving the draft, commissioners are then asked to review and comment on chapters dealing with countries, many about which we know very little.”

The lack of scrutiny is one issue, and the lens through which that scrutiny occurs also matters. Repeatedly,  USCIRF has elected to interpret measures to combat religious extremism as weapons of religious persecution. In Tajikistan, a leading Tajik official questioned whether the United States was fighting or emboldening the Taliban, after Tajikistan earned heavy criticism from USCIRF for requiring religious institutions to register their existence with the government. In the eyes of USCIRF, sharing a vastly open border with Afghanistan is not an acceptable reason to require religious agencies to register, and that this requirement renders Tajikistan a religiously intolerant state. Never mind the “values” of the Taliban and the “tolerance” they bring to the table. From this example alone we know that something is not right. But there are many other alarming examples, such as in the 2017 report, which  also railed against Kazakhstan for blocking funds transfers to people on an established list of known terror financiers. 

In the most recent report, USCIRF has recommended to include Azerbaijan in the State Department’s “Special Watch List”, citing Azerbaijan’s close monitoring of foreign religious leaders within their borders, most crucially because they share a border with Iran. In the eyes of USCIRF, oversight employed by Azerbaijan to vet extremism against religious radicals with proven links to Iran is a matter of religious oppression. Including Azerbaijan on this watch list has raised eyebrows, particularly in light of the fact that Azerbaijan is the oldest majority-Muslim secular republic, and the home and haven to Jewish and varied Christian communities since antiquity. Azerbaijan has been labeled in popular media as an “oasis of tolerance” and as a component of that achievement, Azerbaijan disallows extremism to enter and operate in the country. One of the leading staffers of the USCIRF is its Chief of Public Affairs, Danielle Ashbahian, previously employed as Director of Communications by the Armenian Assembly of America, one of the two main Armenian lobby groups in the U.S., known for their anti-Azerbaijani campaigns. 

The question we must ask USCIRF is what in the world should nations like Azerbaijan do differently? And why would the United States advocate for peaceful democracies to suffer infiltration from foreign extremists, undeterred? Have we not seen, such as in every moment of October 7, what extremism looks like in real time? 

Only through a very limited, twisted lens does religious freedom equal freedom for extremism rather than from it. With hope, let us assume this commission had better intentions. But the majority of research and evidence used to determine these reports, watch lists and sanctions, isn’t nearly close to sufficient, valid, or respectable. The American lens on mitigating foreign extremism and terrorism requires a deep overhaul. And every member of the commission is experienced enough to know that; and to know better. 

 

Freedom for extremism or freedom from extremism? Critical problems with the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom Read More »

Jewish Federation, UC Irvine Host Countering Hate Summit

The Jewish Federation of Orange County and UC Irvine’s School of Social Ecology held a “Countering Hate” summit on Thursday, Feb. 8, featuring various national and local leaders as speakers.

The summit was held at UC Irvine’s Beall Applied Innovation Building and 224 people attended. California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) addressed the summit via video, telling attendees, “I’m your partner and my door is always open to you.” He lamented the rise in antisemitism, pointing out that the number of recorded anti-Jewish bias incidents by the California Department of Justice increased from 152 in 2021 to 189 in 2022. “Hate against any one of us is hate against all of us,” Bonta declared. He told attendees to “notify local law enforcement immediately” if they or anyone know they know believes they were victims of a hate crime.

Bonta also touted California’s diversity and that the Jewish community, which consists of 15% of the state’s population, is a “key part of that diversity.” “Regardless of how you worship what you believe and where you’re from you belong here and I’m committed to fighting for that,” he added.

UC Irvine Chancellor Howard Gillman spoke toward the beginning of the conference, proclaiming that the Oct. 7 massacre was the “largest one-day massacre of Jews” since the Holocaust and “an act of profound gleeful cruelty, the likes of which we have not seen in our lifetimes.”

He recalled how 17 years ago, UC Irvine was in the news “because of hateful incidents that profoundly affected all of us, but especially our Jewish students.” Since then, UC Irvine became the first campus “to systemically assess how to implement” the UC Regents’ statement denouncing antisemitism and antisemitic forms of anti-Zionist, Gillman said. He also touted the “series of events on antisemitism” that the university held, including an event featuring New York Times columnist Bret Stephens.

While Gillman acknowledged that not everything’s perfect on campus, “we can all address these issues with a clear voice and a determined heart.” “This is a summit and let’s reach new heights of insight and effective action,” he added.

Courtesy of the Jewish Federation of Orange County

Jewish Federation of Orange County President and CEO Erik Ludwig also spoke at the beginning of the summit, explaining that there is “widespread fear and anguish here in Orange County and around the country” due to the sharp rise in antisemitism since Oct. 7. “Being together matters,” he said. “Your being here today gives me hope.” He added “we must commit to the future opportunity if we’re going to end antisemitism and hate in Orange County we must lean into partnerships.” As part of that, he announced that the Federation launched a Countering Hate resource page providing “curriculum guidance and professional development.” “We want to build partnerships and a community of practice that will help support a hate-free OC,” Ludwig said.

Orange County District Attorney Todd Spitzer (R) spoke during the “Local Experience” panel, where he argued that “we have to understand the consciousness of the Jewish people;” Spitzer recounted visiting the Dachau death camp as well as his visits to the Holocaust museums in Los Angeles, Washington, D.C. and Israel. If you go to Israel and stand on the border of the Gaza Strip or realize how small Israel is and “everyday their freedom and their safety is in jeopardy,” then you understand “what it means to be a Jew,” Spitzer contended.

Spitzer also announced that Friday is the start of the trial for the Newport Beach man who allegedly murdered Blaze Bernstein, a 19-year-old gay Jewish male in January 2018. Bernstein, a University of Pennsylvania student at the time, was stabbed to death while visiting Orange County during winter break.

Additionally, Spitzer proclaimed that his office is “prepared” to deal with the hate that will be sparked by the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. “If you hate and you hurt, then you have to answer to me and my attorneys,” the Orange County DA declared.

Spitzer argued that while the U.S. Constitution is the “greatest document that was ever created for humankind” due to its protection of freedom of speech, religion, and association, “we pay a huge price in society because of that document.” He called referred to some elected officials as being “idiots” who engage in hate speech “do not understand that the words they use and the actions they take will instill in people.”

The Orange County DA urged attendees “to know who your judges are in Orange County and when they run for office.” Spitzer pointed to a case in which he prosecuted a man named Tyson Mayfield, who was sentenced to five years in prison for shouting racial slurs at a pregnant African American woman and threatening to “drop her baby.” Spitzer sought a 38 years to life sentence since Mayfield had two prior convictions on his record, but the judge only sentenced him to five years because she removed one of Mayfield’s priors. An appeals court later overturned the sentence, putting Mayfield back on trial and making him eligible for the higher prison sentence if convicted.

“You need to speak out against hate for everybody,” Spitzer said. “I don’t care who you love but I do care who you hate.”

Also speaking on that panel was Rabbi Peter Levi, regional director of the Anti-Defamation League’s (ADL) Orange County office. Levi likened Holocaust speakers and museums to bringing “an umbrella to a climate change conference” unless “they’re fully integrated into our curriculum.” “It’s not enough if we really want to move the needle,” argued Levi. “We need systemic approaches to do that.” The ADL is using a “whole of society” approach to address antisemitism, Levi explained.

Levi called for fighting “the false binary” that you’re either for Israel or Palestine, when the “overwhelming majority of Jews in America and Americans are actually for both” Israelis and Palestinians living in safety and security. “Figuring that out is a challenge,” he added.

During the audience Q&A portion of the summit, Levi differentiated between right-wing and left-wing antisemitism by comparing the former to a hurricane that you know is coming and can prepare for, while the latter is more analogous to climate change in that it’s slow-moving and it’s unclear what the long-term impact is. He also touted the ADL”s “No Place for Hate” campaign and that more than 70 schools in Orange County are involved in the program.

The other panel was focused on research and policy. One of the speakers on that panel was Jeffrey Kopstein, a political science professor and director of the Center for Jewish Studies at UC Irvine. Kopstein explained that over the summer, he surveyed 1,500 non-Jewish students at UC Irvine and one other UC school; he found that “there is antisemitism and [it] overlaps with anti-Israel attitudes.” Kopstein acknowledged that it “doesn’t fit perfectly,” but there is a strong correlation between the two.

On the question if universities are the ones producing the antisemitism, Kopstein found that there’s “absolutely no difference in attitudes between the years” of students. “They’re either getting it from before they show up or outside the university,” he said. Kopstein did acknowledge that there is campus antisemitism, it’s just not being produced by the campus, he argued. “America does not have a university problem,” Kopstein declared. “America has an antisemitism problem.”

Another speaker on the policy and research panel was Hannah Yu, the hate crimes chief in the New York County’s DA’s office. Yu highlighted the fact that 2023 saw the highest number of hate crime cases brought by her office; she posited that “when we are such a polarized country or a polarized world … there is much more friction or much tension in every community or group.”

To bring a hate crime case, you have to prove motive, which Yu acknowledged isn’t always easy. She explained that under state law, the Manhattan DA’s office charges drawings of swastikas on “real property” like street lamps and buildings as felonies, and that it’s also a felony to burn a cross and hang a noose. A misdemeanor harassment would involve pulling off an individual’s yarmulke or Star of David, according to Yu.

While New York’s hate crime laws are “robust,” there are some loopholes, Yu said, pointing to to how at one point, gang assaults couldn’t be charged as hate crimes but individual assaults could, an issue that the Manhattan DA’s office addressed by working with legislators to fix it. Additionally, false reporting of an incident is not included as a hate crime under state law, per Yu.

The keynote speaker was Amos Guiora, a law professor at the University of Utah. Guiora spoke about the need to “educate aggressively” against antisemitism, arguing that failing to do so makes you an enabler and bystander. “We are literally at a crossroads,” he declared.

Guiora recalled how he was vacationing in Paris on Oct. 7 when his wife woke him up to inform him about what was going on; they ended up cutting their vacation short and racing home. He did say that there are finally some women’s organizations that are “listening” in regards to the “unimaginable sexual violence” committed by Hamas on Oct. 7. But Guiora asked where the voice are pounding tables and saying “this is wrong” in response to the “from the river to the sea chants.”

Guiora, whose parents were Holocaust survivors, explained that Holocaust minimization was those claiming that the death toll in the Holocaust was two million, not six million, Jews; similarly, Oct. 7 minimization are those who blame Israel for the atrocities that day. He drew parallels between the silence from bystanders during the Holocaust to those who are doing the same now regarding Oct. 7. He argued that there is “zero time” for “more fun” things like watching the Los Angeles Lakers or Golden State Warriors play basketball. He urged the audience to ask themselves, “Are you fighting on behalf of those who don’t have a voice?”

Other speakers included Sociology Professor Dr. Amy Adamczyk, Orange County Human Relations Commissioner Rabbi Richard Steinberg, Irvine Police Chief Michael Kent and Katrina Foley, who serves on the Orange County Board of Supervisors.

Jewish Federation, UC Irvine Host Countering Hate Summit Read More »