fbpx

September 7, 2015

Israel and the refugee crisis: Should we take them in?

Short answer: no.

Israel should not offer to absorb a significant number of Syrian refugees. But an explanation is needed. And other action is needed.

In recent days, as the crisis of the Syrian refugees intensifies and is becoming a dominant item on the world's agenda, a debate is taking place in many countries on how to best address it. There are countries, such as Germany, that are opening their arms and their doors to the refugees. There are countries, such as Hungary, who do not want to let them stay. There are countries, such as the Arab Gulf states, that are being criticized for not taking in refugees. There are other countries that could also do more, and are not doing more, for various reasons, not all of them good reasons.  

Israel is not ignoring the story of the refugees. It is having a debate about them, including one in the political sphere. Labor leader Yitzhak Herzog urged the government to initiate a “controlled absorption” of Syrian refugees in Israel. The head of leftist Meretz made a similar suggestion, and other MK's of other parties also agreed. MK Elazar Stern of Yesh Atid believe Israel should absorb refugees (but the leader of the party, Yair Lapid, opposes such absorption). Deputy Minister (Likud) Ayoub Kara wants Israel to absorb “tens of thousands” of refugees.

On social media, on the radio and on TV shows, Israelis are having this debate, and they have strong feelings about the issue. That should come as no surprise: the sight of the refugees is heartbreaking. And Israelis respond to it the way you'd expect any decent human being to respond – with a sense of horror, a sense of devastation and a sense of great compassion.

The arguments one hears from those in favor of Israel taking responsibility for Syrian refugees are strong: Israel is a country of refugees. It is a country of a people that had to escape from war and oppression. It is a country that still looks with suspicious eyes at a world that closed its doors to Jewish refugees when they had to flee for their lives seventy years ago. “Jews cannot be indifferent” when refugees are looking for a safe haven, said Herzog. That is a sentiment that many Israelis share – I would not be surprised to get the same argument from the leaders of other Jewish communities in the coming days.

There are other arguments in favor of absorption. One refers to geography: Syria is a neighbor. Syrian refugees are Israel's neighbors. A country has a responsibility to help its neighbors. And there is the PR argument: Here is an opportunity for Israel to display its good side. And there is the argument of precedent: Prime Minister Menachem begin decided, back in the 1970s, to absorb refugees from Vietnam.

Eight years ago I wrote an article (for Slate) about Israel's somewhat similar dilemma regarding the fate of refugees from Darfur. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert decided to reject Darfurians at the gate. And as I wrote back then, “the memory of the Holocaust and the Jewish refugees who wanted to flee Europe but could find no country willing to accept them was a handy weapon for those who criticized Israel for its cold-hearted decision.”

No doubt, Israel will yet again have to defend itself from accusations and criticism. That is because Israel is not going to absorb refugees from Syria. “Israel is a very small country. It has no demographic depth and has no geographic breadth,” PM Netanyahu said on Sunday, in response to Herzog's call for action. “We must protect our borders against illegal immigrants and against the perpetrators of terrorism. We cannot allow Israel to be flooded with infiltrators,” Netanyahu said.

Netanyahu could have tried to convey his message in more appropriate terms. The refugees are no “perpetrators of terrorism,” and there is no reason to make it sound as if they are (Netanyahu did not say that they are – but he did use the unnecessary word “terrorism” in this context). And, true, Israel is a small country – but is that really an excuse? Would we reject an opportunity to absorb a hundred thousand Jewish immigrants – say, from France – because we are a small country?

Wrong words – right policy – as is often the case with Netanyahu.

Israel cannot involve itself in Syria's war. If the world wants to stop the bloodshed, and with it the the flood of suffering refugees, the world has much better means with which to bring about an end to the civil war. The international community did nothing to stop that war, except talking, and now the war is at its doorstep. There is no reason for anyone to gloat about that.

Israel cannot involve itself in the Syrian war, and it cannot be the refuge for Syrians who want to flee Syria. In fact, Israel is the worst candidate for such a mission. Syria is an enemy country. Syrians are educated to loath Israel, and I assume many of them do. Letting them get in makes little sense. Some would not want to come. And if they do, they might not be able to go back. And when they are here, they will have to be supervised for security reasons. And their presence will make Israelis nervous – for good reason. And Israeli supervision will make them nervous – because they know Israel only as a threat.

And as for being neighbors: That is really an argument against absorption. Had they been from someplace far, and from a country with which Israel has no active conflict, and from a culture that does not teach Israel hatred – it would have been a different case. But the Syrians come from a country with which Israel does have an active conflict. They come from a country that has a claim over territory that Israel keeps under its own jurisdiction.

Of course, the fact that Israel does not want to be a shelter for Syrian refugees does not mean that Israel should not strive to be useful in helping Syrian refugees. Israel has already done many things, some of them under the radar, to assist some of the people who suffer in Syria. Visitors to various Israeli hospitals in the north can testify that the number of wounded Syrians that Israel takes in and gives treatment to is probably much higher than most Israelis realize.

Israel can do more. It can send financial, medical, and other types of aid to the countries to which Syrian refugees flock. That is, if these Syrians are willing to eat Israeli food, get examined by Israeli doctors, live in Israeli tents. Israel should make such an offer to the European governments that are currently bearing the burden of hosting the refugees. It should make the offer to world Jewish organizations with which it can collaborate to organize such humanitarian missions.

Herzog's suggestion was not wise, but his instinct was well-placed. Something needs to be done.

So that is the message I would like to hear from an Israeli government – a positive can-do message. Here is what Israel wants to do for the refugees, here is what Israel is going to offer. And as for the things that Israel cannot do – there’s not much point in talking about them.

Israel and the refugee crisis: Should we take them in? Read More »

The Pleasures of Staying Home

I was never known to be a “homebody.” Home was merely the place where I fell asleep, kept my clothes and took my daily shower. Work, focused activity, real conversations and daily living were reserved for “the outside.”

I was known to employ a fierce dedication at the office, enjoy intimate evenings in cozy restaurants, and look for some crazy-all-out-fun at the latest clubs. As I said, home was for sleep and little more. So my home existed in a quiet place where nothing was happening, on a small conservative block in the heart of Brooklyn.

And the house was somewhat cared for, cleaned, and even organized through the bi-weekly visits of my regular cleaning lady. The refrigerator was kept haphazardly stocked by my supermarket-spreeing husband, and the sink and counters were forever overflowing with his dirty dishes, his magazines, and his psychology papers (he was a graduate psych student).

I went out to the local coffee shop for a quiet cup of coffee alone each morning before work. And I took my husband out of the mess for dinners.

Probably even my dog felt more at home in the house than I did. But then, I was always much too busy being involved with “outside” people — with customers at my sales job, with business friends and occasional personal ones — to take the time to care for such a wayward inanimate object as my house.

And I was always very tired at the end of the day and the house always loomed so large and I never knew where it was up to or even what it contained. All I knew was that it felt like a cluttered stranger, my so-called “home,” and that it always screamed of my husband's and my dog's messes — not mine. My few things were kept orderly in one tiny bedroom where I slept and dressed and occasionally wrote. And I ate on the outside.

But then one day came the totally unexpected shock of my being laid-off from work. And I suddenly found myself in a queasy state of limbo, grappling with such uncomfortable questions as my sense of identity, how to occupy my time, and searching for some ideas of where I would be heading in the future.

The shock, frustration, anger and dismay at dismissal began to wear off, however, about seven days later, and I came to experience a refreshing sense of relief. All of a sudden, I could smile — really smile — not because I had to … to get along with coworkers, not because I had to be polite in response to my boss's inane jokes, and not because I was trying to convince a potential customer how wonderful it would be to work with me as his account executive. I had smile for no reason at all.

So I stopped smiling — always. And then I realized I had begun smiling again — spontaneously, easily and often — simply because I felt like it, liked it, and because it seemed to make those I instinctively smiled upon feel good as well.

Inner calm began to take the place of a constant inner anxiety. And I learned that a sense of purpose could be gleaned even from my simple daily activities and their immediate rewards.

When I found myself alone during the day in the huge house, my formerly neglected dog suddenly became wonderfully friendly and appreciative company. I discovered that my living room in the sunlight held a special aura of airy gaiety. As for my attic workroom, I once again became a regular visitor to this cool space of quiet refuge — to dream, to create, and to write.

But before all this could happen, I first had to claim the house as my own. My cleaning lady quit a couple of weeks after I'd lost my job. This unexpected disappointment, too, eventually proved to be a blessing in disguise. I couldn't really afford her services — now that I wasn't working — but after two years on the job, I hadn't the heart to let her go. But now keeping order was all up to me.

After she left, I grudgingly began to clean and organize the house, slowly and thoroughly, two rooms a day. When they began to shine, I felt good knowing that they were spotless in places that she had never reached. The physical exercise involved in washing windows and mopping floors and stretching to dust the highest shelves did my spirit good as well. As my face flushed from bodily activity, my mind grew calm. I simply felt good. And I took pride in the real, evident and instantaneous rewards of such basic work.

Once I had the kitchen organized and knew the place of each pot and plate, I began to cook real meals once again. For now I had the time to shop leisurely at the supermarket and specialty shops, to gather healthy ingredients, carefully and lovingly picked. And by dredging up the many, almost-forgotten and never-tried recipes of my childhood, together with surprisingly correct cooking instincts, I began to create healthy and delicious dinners in a kitchen which I now controlled and considered my domain.

I ate well, and so felt well. I gulped down far less coffee for I didn't have to force myself to work continuously in a way which I disliked, and now there was far less phoniness and anxiety in my life. I also had the time and patience to help my husband with his coursework, and to feed him well. He, too, began to feel happier and more at ease in this home which was now being well kept and maintained by me. And so life became easier and more pleasant between us.

After the daily cleaning and maintaining of my home, I couldn't help but begin to feel close to it as well. I now feel comfortable in, and loving toward, this big house, toward its members and — having aired out my head and reestablished the goodness of who I am — toward myself.

After seven years of a hectic “working” marriage, I find that the art of being a housewife — a rare condition, generally undermined these days — has become a refreshing blessing to my psyche. And I find the pleasures of staying home to be the best working therapy I've encountered to date.

I remain ever active; yet plan my days to my biological system's natural ups and downs. The toughest jobs (or those least desirable) are tackled first thing after breakfast. I can do them best when my energy level is at its peak, and the early sense of accomplishment which I attain at their fulfillment warms me throughout my activities for the rest of the day.

Breakfast is always leisurely and accompanied by the daily paper — but now I read whatever interests me, knowing I can return for more news at relaxing intervals during the day. There's no mad rush to make the train. I dress comfortably, yet well. I need that for my sense of self. And I feel like I'm ready for anything — a bike ride, exercise stretch, as well as a visit to the local bank, shopping center and library.

And I have the time to devote to the people I truly love as I never could before. I can make an appointment to meet a good friend for lunch and know I'll be there … and not have to cancel because of a last-minute business emergency. There's the time to finally buy my eleven-year-old nephew a birthday present; and my husband, some good quality socks.

I make my own schedule now. And I can finally, really, take care of my physical self as well. I'm my own person. Not someone's employee or lover or occasional figurehead wife.

Surprisingly enough, dealing daily with the small matters in life hasn't come to make me petty or narrow — as my own fears and those of others often predict. Rather the opposite: it has seemed to broaden my scope. I've become more in touch with the basic rhythms of living, the things that really matter, the heart and soul of daily life. I can stop what I'm doing to cry — when I hear that a child has been killed mistakenly, or for the victim of a futile war. And I can rejoice in modern miracles of medicine — like the story of a severed limb being reattached to a young accident victim. For I have that time and space to reflect, to feel, and to care and act as I see fit.

I need not hide my true nature under an ever-cheerful and efficient office mask. And — would you believe — I do most of my “real living” at home now and not, as before, always outside of the house. We, my husband and I, can relax in a clean living room. We can enjoy my proudly cooked dinners, then calmly discuss and advise upon matters of our lives after the meal.

We can also leisurely entertain our friends at home now, for I need not worry about not having time, the next day, to clean up. Or having to wake up at six to get to the office and being always alert. Whereas earlier my energies were limited and constrained to one purpose, they are now both bountiful and concerned with all.

I plan to continue to enjoy this unexpected respite of being home and its concurrent pleasures for as long as I can … and as long as my unemployment benefits last. I have no idea as to what type of work I'll seek, and be involved with, after that. But I do know, for right now, I've inadvertently stumbled upon something uniquely precious — a state of grace which I hope to never completely give up, ever again.

For no matter my future employment or my goals, for peace of mind and the fulfillment of my truest nature, I'll always need some time to be by myself — contentedly and happily at home.

 

FULL DISCLOSURE: I just found this typewriter-printed essay while clearing out boxes for a non-moving move-out after the great flood (see my earlier blog: “Revenge of the Dishwasher”) so my original 1950's terrazzo flooring could be exposed and refinished. I'd written the piece over thirty years ago when I was a 20-something living with my ex-husband in a large, run-down Brooklyn brownstone whose rent was totally affordable at the time.

Upon reading my early work, I was shocked to discover I'd been an active blogger — aka writer of reflective essays — way before blogging was cool, and before I became a “commercially” successful magazine writer. The even greater shock was to realize I'm basically still the same person I was at 27 — at least on the inside. Other than switching the term “discos” to “clubs” so the piece wouldn't appear dated (and substituting my current married name), I changed nary a word.

© 2015 Mindy Leaf

Follow Mindy's essays of biting social commentary at: “>https://askmamaglass.wordpress.com

The Pleasures of Staying Home Read More »

The Challenge of Contemporary Israel – What to do about Asylum Seekers?

The establishment of the state of Israel fundamentally changed the situation of the Jew in the world, who we had been and who we would become. For most of the past 3000 years Jews lived in exile, subject to the rule of others, without national sovereignty and power of our own, without the enormous challenges that come with ruling a nation.

Today, Syrian refugees are desperate to find safe harbor outside of their tortured land, and many want to come to Israel for asylum.

Israel has been tested already over the last number of years about how to accommodate 50,000 Eritrean and Sudanese Refugees who had crossed the border into Israel from Africa seeking asylum from some of the worst dictators in the world.

Every nation has the right and duty to protect its borders. No nation as small as Israel can be expected to be the home for every suffering human being.  However, as we Jews know only too well what it means to flee persecution and violence, we might expect that the government of the state of Israel, of all nations, given our most recent history of being a hunted people, would have in place a compassionate and reasonable policy to welcome refugees and asylum seekers that could enable these stateless people to live with dignity until conditions in their nations of origin change and they can go home without fear.

 

Rabbi Dow Marmur put the challenge succinctly this week as he reflected upon a new wave of asylum seekers from Syria seeking refuge in Israel:

“We Jews found it easy to preach morality when we had no power to put it into practice. Now with a state of our own and the paramount need to protect it, national interests seem to take precedence. The challenge of contemporary Israel is how to live up to the lofty teachings of Judaism while responding to the challenges of a modern democratic sovereign state surrounded by hostile forces.”

The Challenge of Contemporary Israel – What to do about Asylum Seekers? Read More »

Germany’s moral courage

Around 7 a.m. last Sunday, The New York Times landed on my balcony with a thud, like it always does. It woke me up and startled my cats, like it usually does, until we all realized it’s the same old, same old, and lay our heads down again.

But when I finally emerged about an hour later, dressed, cats fed, coffee in hand, I pulled The Times out of its sea-blue plastic wrapping, scanned the front-page headlines and had to do a double take: There was nothing ‘same-old’ about the day’s big news.

Beneath a picture of an ecstatic-looking crowd of men and women of various ages, all with huge smiles on their faces and arms raised in celebratory cheer, was the astonishing headline:

Germany Welcomes Thousands of Weary Migrants.

Wait a minute, my brain cautioned. You mean, that Germany?

I read a little more…

MUNICH – Germans waving welcome signs in German, English and Arabic came to the train station here Saturday to greet the first group of what is expected to be about 8,000 migrants to arrive in Germany by early Sunday… Germans applauded and volunteers offered hot tea, food and toys as about 450 migrants arrived… Germany, which had held out an open hand…

Germany. Which held out an open hand.

Oh, sweet irony of history!

But indeed it was so: While the rest of Europe fretted over what to do about a crisis that is being called “the largest wave of emigration since World War II,” Germany, led by its courageous and moral Chancellor Angela Merkel, signaled its willingness to heed the call of millions of desperate refugees, many of whom have been rendered stateless by the war in Syria and other Middle East crises.

While the United States has sat idly by, draped in its aggrandizing values of justice and liberty for all, its political passivity partly responsible for the refugee crisis to begin with, Germany steps forward with leadership and humanity.

While the Gulf States of Qatar, Kuwait, Saudia Arabia and the United Arab Emirates defend themselves against charges of apathy and indifference, Germany opens its arms. “You can’t welcome people who come from a different atmosphere, from a different place, who suffer from psychological problems, from trauma, and enter them into societies,” Kuwaiti commentator Fahad Al-Shelaimi, chairman of the Gulf Forum for Peace and Security, said last March during a televised address on France24’s Arabic channel.

The Gulf States – and the United States – have a few things in common: Both have opened their checkbooks (Saudi Arabia: $18.4 million; Kuwait: $304 million; U.S.: $1.1 billion), while refusing to open their borders. Instead Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan, whose per capita incomes are but a fraction of those in the Gulf States, have absorbed the largest number of refugees (Turkey: 2 million; Lebanon: 1.2 million; Jordan: 630,000). The U.S. has agreed to a paltry 1,500.

So far, only Germany, and her neighboring Austria, have risked their own stability and security to absorb these fleeing refugees, with Germany expecting to receive 800,000 this year alone.

The country’s compassion moved the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees to praise Germany, Austria and “civil society” itself for their “remarkable” response to the crisis. “This is political leadership based on humanitarian values,” said a UNHCR statement issued on Sept. 5. Newsweek declared Germany’s Chancellor Merkel “Europe’s Conscience.”

Yes, that Germany. The Germany that between 1939 and 1945 provoked a frantic emigration of its own – that is, for the lucky few who could actually escape its death grip as the country’s maniacal leader and his obedient minions sent millions of Jews and other unfortunate minorities to death pits, concentration camps, gas chambers and burning ovens. That Germany saw itself as superior; as a burgeoning empire that had to cleanse itself of the other –the stranger, the refugee, the Jew – who did not belong, as the Kuwaiti official would have us believe, in a civilized society. That Germany destroyed a generation, murdering 11 million human beings as easily as it obliterated entire states. But history, it turns out, does not repeat itself in Germany.

Who could have predicted that one of the 20th century’s leading countries in moral depravity would become the 21st century’s world leader in moral courage?

  

While Lady Liberty rusts in the heat of an increasingly simmering sun, Hitler’s onetime puppet country beckons the tired and poor, the huddled Middle Eastern masses yearning to breathe free – of violence, and poverty, and terror. “I just want my sons to study and get jobs,” 35-year-old Syrian refugee and mother of three, Rania al-Hamawi told The Times.

What a lucky twist of fate, then, that the country with the biggest heart also boasts one of the world’s most robust economies. God could hardly have planned this any better.

Seventy years ago, who could have imagined that the country that nearly annihilated God’s Chosen would one day be chosen as a light among nations? Who could have foreseen that the place that almost destroyed the Jewish tradition would come to embody some of its most essential, enduring tenets: Teshuvah, change is possible. The future need not look like the past. Redemption is yours, waiting to be claimed. The world can indeed be re-created: Hayom Harat Olam, Rosh Hashanah tells us. This is the day the world was created – and it is created again and again, every year.

Germany is living these values. We should, too.

Shana Tovah.

Germany’s moral courage Read More »

#myLAcommute Cheese, cheese, cheese

BRIAN JACKSON

I’m originally from Missouri. I’ve lived in L.A. for six years. I can’t complain, but I miss living in a city with four seasons. I miss fall very much. And the beginning of the snow.

I’m coming from work. I’m a server, but I still crave the pizza. That’s the tough part—to control myself. I don’t do lots of meat, but I do cheese, cheese, cheese!

Sunset Boulevard to Rampart Boulevard

#myLAcommute is a project of Zócalo Public Square.

#myLAcommute Cheese, cheese, cheese Read More »