fbpx

May 7, 2014

Alan Dershowitz’s secret weapon

World-famous lawyer, best-selling author, Harvard professor — Alan Dershowitz’s list of accomplishments is very, very long. And the number of controversial topics that he feels comfortable weighing in on — J Street, George Zimmerman, Jonathan Pollard, Donald Sterling — has made him a regular face on nightly news shows.

While sitting down with the Journal on a recent visit to Los Angeles, Dershowitz added another item to the list of things that make him such an interesting public figure: He’s considering becoming an Israeli citizen.

It’s not necessarily because he and his wife, Carolyn Cohen, have any intention of making aliyah; it’s because the outspoken Dershowitz wants to send a message to the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement that is gaining steam in Europe and on many American college campuses.

The following is an edited excerpt of an interview with Dershowitz in which he  touched on everything from European anti-Semitism to South Africa’s Archbishop Desmond Tutu. 

Jewish Journal: You say you are considering applying for Israeli citizenship and becoming a dual American-Israeli citizen. Why?

Alan Dershowitz: For one purpose alone. I would become a dual citizen only so that I can do what Evgeny Kissin, the great [Jewish-Russian] pianist, has done. No one who believes in the BDS movement can ever come and watch him play the piano because they would have to be boycotting him. If you believe in the BDS movement, then you have to boycott me. 

JJ: Meaning what?

AD: Don’t ask me to speak at your university. Don’t ask me to represent you. Whatever you do in relation to Israelis, I want to be included among that. Whatever you boycott Israelis for, I want to be boycotted for.

JJ: Is BDS really that big a threat?

AD: About a year ago I remember speaking to some people from the Jewish leadership in the U.S. who said to me that BDS should be ignored. I was focusing very hard on it. They were wrong. It’s a very important weapon. It’s one that is increasing in its effectiveness.

JJ: Where is it strongest? BDS is still trying to go mainstream in America.

AD: I don’t think that BDS will succeed in the United States. I think it will be an utter failure in the United States. America overwhelmingly supports Israel. No president of any university will support it, and any president who does support it will lose his job.

JJ: Then where will it succeed in trying to choke off parts of Israel’s economy?

AD: It will succeed in Europe because Europe has a long, long history of anti-Semitism. Who is promoting the BDS movement [in Europe]? It’s the grandchildren of the people who promoted the boycott of Jewish goods in the 1930s. We’ve only seen a short-term stop in a long-term history of anti-Semitism in Europe. 

JJ: Which European nations, in particular, do you have in mind?

AD: It will succeed in England and in France, particularly. Probably not in Germany, interestingly enough.

JJ: How would you advise pro-Israel Americans to ensure that BDS does not become here what you think it will become in Europe?

AD: It has to be exposed. It seems like it’s Gandhi-esque, and it’s not. The vast majority of people who support BDS think that they are supporting a tactical effort simply to put pressure on Israel to end civilian settlements and the occupation of the West Bank. But the leaders of the BDS movement have made it very clear they challenge Israel’s legitimacy to exist as the nation-state of the Jewish people.

JJ: Are there any concrete steps you recommend in addition to exposure?

AD: Counter boycotts. If co-ops and stores are boycotting Israeli products, people who oppose that boycott should engage in a counter-boycott. If universities divest from Israel, alumni should divest from those universities. You do fight economic fire with economic fire. Fight back — very, very vigorously.

JJ: You were on Nelson Mandela’s international legal defense team. Mandela resisted pressure to label Israel as an apartheid state. Archbishop Desmond Tutu, though, embraces the comparison. Is there any element of truth in comparing Israel to apartheid South Africa?

AD: He [Mandela] was a decent man. Bishop Tutu is not a decent man. He’s an old-fashioned Jew hater. Everything Jewish he despises. He’s the villain. He should know better than anybody, even if you take the worst-case approach to Israel and assume all the worst about it, it doesn’t come close to what South African apartheid was. A small group of white people dominated a vast majority of black people. It [Israel] would be more like American control over Puerto Rico than South African apartheid.

JJ: Secretary of State John Kerry recently said, and then took back, that Israel risks becoming an apartheid state absent the creation of a Palestinian state. What’s your take?

AD: It was wrong, but as I understand it, J Street, before he even took it back, J Street supported it.

JJ: For years, you have spoken out strongly against J Street. Why?

AD: J Street is not a friend of Israel. J Street almost never says anything positive or constructive about Israel. J Street almost always takes positions that are against the consensus in Israel. Almost no one in Israel believes that Israel will ever be an apartheid state, and J Street does. Almost everybody believes that America should keep the military option on the table in relation to Iran, but J Street does not. Truth in labeling requires that J Street not call itself pro-Israel.

JJ: Moving on to the legal aspect of Palestinians seeking world recognition of a state, where do you see the Palestinian Authority (PA) going, especially if negotiations with Israel remain on hiatus?

AD: They will try to get recognized by the United Nations, and they probably will succeed. That won’t give them an inch of land back.

JJ: What about Palestinian pressure on the International Criminal Court (ICC) to try Israeli leaders, generals and soldiers for what they say are war crimes?

AD: If the ICC takes jurisdiction, it will mark the end of the ICC because the U.S. will never join it.

JJ: Now that the PA and Hamas have signed a reconciliation agreement, what are Israel’s options for negotiations?

AD: I think [PA President Mahmoud] Abbas overplayed his hand. This will mark his end as a leader of the PA. We’ll see a lot of turmoil within the PA and within Hamas, and the dust has to settle.

Alan Dershowitz’s secret weapon Read More »

Prager and Dershowitz go head to head, heart to heart

Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz and radio talk-show host Dennis Prager sparred over everything from politics to religious identity to attitudes about Israel during a 90-minute event dubbed “The Forum on Critical Values” on April 29 at Stephen S. Wise Temple.

Speaking before the evening’s 1,500 attendees, Dershowitz challenged American-Jewish leaders.

“We have to do a better job in attracting young Jews to Judaism and we have to use every means at our disposal, and it includes modernization and change and adaptability and making Judaism relevant to contemporary feelings and contemporary ideology,” he said. “That means a compromise … nothing is easy, nothing is pure, there is no single path.”

Prager was more pessimistic, spotlighting failings in the Reform and Conservative movements as the reason that the only growing denomination is Orthodoxy, according to the “Survey of American Jewish Life” released last year by the Pew Research Center.

“Non-Orthodox Judaism is failing,” he said. The culprit, he said, is leftism — specifically, “social justice as it is understood by the left, environmentalism as it is understood by the left, morality as it is understood by the left.” 

Prager said he believes this country’s Jewish community is indifferent about Israel and that this attitude is another reason to feel concern about the future.

“American Jews don’t give a hoot about Israel. That’s mind-boggling. I never would have predicted that,” he said. “There’s a Jewish state. There are 200 states on Earth — one Jewish and one the size of New Jersey and you don’t give a damn if it survives or not, and that is increasingly the case with young American Jews.”

[Related: Alan Dershowitz’s secret weapon]

The differences between the two men was not a surprise. Dershowitz, 75, a noted attorney who has been involved with high-profile criminal defense cases, skews liberal on politics. He is also the author of several books, including the influential defense of the Jewish state, “The Case for Israel.” His latest book, the autobiographical “Taking the Stand,” is his 30th.

The conservative Prager, 65, meanwhile, is a nationally syndicated radio personality. He is the author of the seminal “Nine Questions People Ask About Judaism,” co-written by Rabbi Joseph Telushkin. His latest book is “Still the Best Hope: Why the World Needs American Values to Triumph.”

In some ways, as Prager noted during the evening, the two speakers’ early lives mirror each other. Both grew up attending yeshivas, both struggled academically in high school, and both eventually left behind the Orthodox world that surrounded them in their childhoods on the East Coast.

Today, though, their differences are many. Concerning religion, Dershowitz describes himself as post-denominational and skeptical about the Torah’s divine origins. Instead, he said, he draws on what he reads to form his own belief system. 

Meanwhile, Prager — who is also a Journal columnist — is a member of Stephen S. Wise Temple, a Reform synagogue, but holds the Orthodox belief that the Torah comes from God. So Prager said that if he finds himself disagreeing with the Torah, he assumes he is in the wrong. 

And while both are defenders of Israel, Dershowitz openly criticizes Israel on certain government policies. 

During the April 29 event, the topic of Israel’s reception on college campuses prompted some of the more emotional responses from the crowd. A collective gasp resounded in the audience when Dershowitz said that pro-Israel students at Harvard are too embarrassed to admit they might support Israel. He was speaking anecdotally, referring to a story he’d heard from a friend of his grandson, who attends school there.

Both men offered up grim predictions for the future of Judaism in Europe, with Dershowitz saying that the future of Judaism is in the United States, Canada and in Israel, despite the presence of prominent Jewish figures in the United Kingdom.

At certain points, the evening felt like a competition, with Dershowitz and Prager vying for “most intellectually entertaining.” So many of their arguments prompted laughs and applause that, at one point, the moderator, Stephen S. Wise’s Rabbi David Woznica, asked audience members to withhold their enthusiasm until the end of the night.

 And in many ways, it was not a typical community event. At 7 p.m., about 30 minutes before the forum began, the temple felt like the Hollywood Bowl: A few attendees ate dinner in the plaza outside the sanctuary; others stepped off a shuttle that had transported them to the hilltop campus. Even A-list star Larry David was in the audience. 

David wasn’t the only comic who wanted to hear what Dershowitz and Prager had to say. Elon Gold, who shmoozed with David in the sanctuary lobby at the end of the event, told the Journal that the evening left him with a feeling of respect for both speakers, particularly for their ability to get a laugh. 

“These two guys are just super-intellectual, and, obviously, just like they can formulate a thought and an opinion, they can formulate a joke,” he said. 

Regardless of their views, both have an important place in the community, Gold said.

“It wasn’t really about super-liberal versus super-conservative. It was really about two of the greatest, most important Jewish voices of our time coming together and enlightening us on a range of Jewish-themed topics,” he said. “They are people who need to be heard and whether or not one is right about something and one is wrong about the other, that is not important.”

Prager and Dershowitz go head to head, heart to heart Read More »

Iranian-Jewish doctor spreads Holocaust truth in Farsi

As Jews worldwide remembered and honored the 6 million Jewish victims of the Holocaust in recent weeks, Dr. Ari Babaknia, a renowned Newport Beach Iranian-Jewish obstetrician and gynecologist, was crisscrossing the country — touring Southern California and New York City — and making his own unique contribution to the cause.

The 60-something Babaknia is not a formally trained Holocaust scholar, nor a professional historian, yet he found himself educating Iranians of various religions about the Nazis’ Final Solution and other 20th-century genocides. His undying passion to learn about the Shoah in the last two decades has made him the sole voice of Holocaust awareness to millions of Iranians in the United States and overseas.

“Many years ago, I realized that there was no book about the Holocaust in Farsi, even though there are more than 150 million people in the world who are fluent in Farsi,” said Babaknia, who attended medical school in Iran but underwent his specialty training at Johns Hopkins University in Maryland. “My goal and the goal of my organization, the Memorah Foundation, is to spread the truth about the Holocaust in the Middle East because people in the region and Iran have been hearing rhetoric about the Holocaust, and now they want to know the truth about the Holocaust.”

In 2012, his efforts culminated in the publication of the first and only original Farsi-language history of the Shoah, a four-volume, 2,400-page book called “Holocaust.” (There have been some works related to the topic translated into Farsi, but none nearly as comprehensive.) Then, earlier this year, he published “Humanity, Not,” a 300-page English-language book that juxtaposes the words of scholars, survivors, Holocaust victims and others with impressionistic sketches about the Shoah from the late Iranian-Muslim artist Ardeshir Mohasses. 

“Mr. Mohasses was like the Iranian Norman Rockwell — perhaps more famous than Rockwell because he was internationally renowned,” Babaknia said. “He did 300 amazing paintings, capturing almost every aspect of the Holocaust, capturing both the emotions and ethics of the victims and the perpetrators of the Holocaust in a very graphic manner.”

Babaknia’s earlier work, “Holocaust,” is more of a straightforward history. It details the events of the Shoah from the rise of Nazism in Germany to the final days of World War II. The book is also filled with graphic photographs from the era as well as countless official U.S. and European government documents from the time period. The final volume chronicles other genocides that occurred in Armenia, Bosnia, Cambodia, Rwanda and Sudan.

He wrote out the book by hand, which required 13,000 pages, and spent $2.5 million over the years on the research, assistants and other elements necessary to put it together. 

More than 3,000 copies of the book have been sold through a select few bookstores in Southern California and online. All proceeds have gone to the Memorah Foundation to educate individuals of Middle Eastern background about the Holocaust and the need for tolerance. 

“Believe it or not, 90 percent of the buyers of the Holocaust book in Farsi have been Iranian-Muslims because they have real interests and curiosity to learn more about it,” Babaknia said. “There has never been a definitive book about this subject matter in their mother language until now, which is drawing their attention.”

Its success has led to speaking invitations from many Iranian community and social groups, including mosques. 

Ali Massoudi, a 77-year-old retired Iranian-Muslim journalist based in Irvine, said the book has wide appeal.

“I’ve received feedback myself that people in Iran who have seen Dr. Babaknia on Iranian television broadcasting from the U.S. have been encouraged to learn more about the Holocaust and are trying to find out how to get their hands on copies of the book,” he said. “Dr. Babaknia’s book presents the Holocaust as a tragedy for all of humanity and not just the Jews — this has really resonated with Iranians of different faiths.”

Babaknia’s books come at an important time for his target population. In March, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei questioned if the Holocaust took place, and the country’s former president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, was a longtime Holocaust denier. The Iranian regime also has  hosted several conferences over the years, featuring American neo-Nazis and Holocaust revisionists. 

Frank Nikbakht, an Iranian-American human rights activist who heads the Los Angeles-based Committee for Minority Rights in Iran, said there will be lasting, positive impacts among average non-Jewish Iranians living in Iran and elsewhere as a result of Babaknia’s work.

“After more than three decades of censorship of the Holocaust in Iran, Dr. Babaknia’s documentation of this historical event in Farsi and its potential of becoming a credible source for future generations of Iranian-Muslims is indeed a major landmark whose importance will increase with time,” he said.

Babaknia said he has plans in the near future to make “Holocaust” available online for anyone to download for free from his foundation’s website, knowhate.org. This online resource provides visitors with information about the Holocaust and other genocides in Farsi and English, with translations in Turkish and Arabic expected to come.

Despite the positive reception Babaknia’s book has received from non-Jewish Iranian-Americans, the author said he’s been surprised by the amount of indifference he’s encountered from many Iranian Jews.

“I am honestly amazed that people in the Iranian-Jewish community tell me in front of my face, ‘Thank you for what you have done, but I’m not going to read your book because it will make me sad.’ 

“Our emotions about the Holocaust should be more than anger, more than sadness and more than a revolting feeling. We have to read and learn about the Holocaust  so we can become better human beings and become more sensitized to others’ suffering.”

Tabby Davoodi is among the young leaders in the local Iranian-Jewish community who have been drawn to Babaknia’s message and efforts to educate Iranians about the Holocaust.

“The Talmud teaches us that ‘in a place where there is no leader, strive to be a leader.’ Dr. Babaknia embodies this wisdom and call to action,” said Davoodi, executive director of 30 Years After, a Los Angeles-based Iranian-Jewish organization. “In the end, the Shoah belongs to all Jews, including Iranian Jews, because it is forever tragically sealed in the fabric of the Jewish people,” Davoodi said. “As Iranian-American Jews, we are but one thread in this unbreakable fabric, and any loss of Jewish life anywhere around the world is ours to mourn.”

For more information about Dr. Ari Babaknia’s new book and Shoah commemoration events in the Iranian-Jewish community, visit Karmel Melamed’s blog: jewishjournal.com/iranianamericanjews. 

Iranian-Jewish doctor spreads Holocaust truth in Farsi Read More »

Rabbi David Wax pleads guilty to kidnapping in agunah case

New Jersey Rabbi David Wax pleaded guilty to kidnapping charges as part of a scheme to force an Israeli to give his wife a get.

The rabbi admitted to being paid $100,000 to compel the man — identified by the Associated Press as Yisrael Briskman — to grant his wife a religious writ of divorce, known as a get. The money came from Briskman’s wife.

Wax lured Briskman to his house on Oct. 17, 2010, had him beaten by a group of thugs and threatened to bury him alive in the Pocono Mountains unless he agreed to give the get, according to court papers cited by the N.Y. Daily News.

Under Orthodox law, women whose husbands refuse to grant them religious writs of divorce may not remarry; they are known as agunahs, or chained women.

A native of the haredi Orthodox township of Lakewood, Wax and eight others were arrested in July 2011 following an FBI investigation into thugs-for-hire who used violence to coerce recalcitrant husbands into grant religious divorces to their wives.

On Tuesday, Wax pleaded guilty to conspiring to commit kidnapping and faces life in prison and a $250,000 fine. He is to be sentenced Aug. 19.

Rabbi David Wax pleads guilty to kidnapping in agunah case Read More »

Hamas executes two men in Gaza as spies for Israel

Two Palestinians were executed in the Gaza Strip on Wednesday as Israeli spies, the enclave's Islamist Hamas government said, adding they had helped the Jewish state's armed forces carry out lethal operations.

The condemned men, one of whom was hanged and the other shot by firing squad, “provided the Occupation (Israel) with information that led to the martyrdowm of citizens”, the Interior Ministry said in a statement.

Since Hamas took control of the Gaza Strip in 2007, at least 19 prisoners have been executed, 10 of them as alleged spies.

Hamas refuses to recognize Israel and its charter calls for the destruction of the Jewish state.

Under local law, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas is meant to have the final say on whether executions should be carried out. Hamas has refused any such consultations, though it entered a unity deal with Abbas last month designed to end a seven-year rift.

Human rights groups have repeatedly condemned the use of the death penalty in Gaza, but Hamas rejects such criticism.

The Interior Ministry statement said the men executed on Wednesday had been convicted of treason for providing Israel with information used to kill Palestinians and bomb Gaza targets. Both had exhausted legal options and had access to attorneys, the statement said.

Reporting by Nidal al-Mughrabi; Writing by Dan Williams; Editing by Andrew Roche

Hamas executes two men in Gaza as spies for Israel Read More »

Mandy Patinkin lets loose

Mandy Patinkin has done Shakespeare and Showtime, Sondheim and “Oyfn Pripetchik,” but one thing he does not do is a dull after-dinner speech.

The legendary veteran of Broadway and screens large and small let it all hang out when he accepted the Yitzhak Rabin Peace Award recently from the dovish Americans for Peace Now on whose board he serves.

Over the course of 25 minutes, the famously intense Patinkin:

  • Quoted Psalm 137 (“If I forget thee O Jerusalem”)
  • Paused mid-speech to sing, from start to finish, a medley of Rodgers and Hammerstein’s “You’ve Got to Be Carefully Taught” and Stephen Sondheim’s “Children Will Listen”
  • Told a story of attending a Soviet Jewry rally in 1982 with his baby son and getting “bad vibes” from a man who turned about to be Benjamin Netanyahu
  • Handed APN founder Mark Rosenblum blank white drawing tablets (representing “endless possibilities”) to hand to the governments of Israel, the Palestinians, and the United States, and to the writers’ room of “Homeland”
  • Proposed that, if the peace process doesn’t advance, “Homeland” should do a season (or a spin-off) about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
  • Wrapped things up by leading the audience in a sing-along of the peace anthem “Od Yavo Shalom Aleinu”

 

Mandy Patinkin lets loose Read More »

The language of pleading eyes: A Mother’s Day story

“The music of his life suddenly stopped.” So reads a line in Chaim Nachman Bialik’s powerful poem, “After My Death.” 

My mother’s music suddenly stopped 30 years ago, but she is still alive.

At the age of 53, Elaine Wolpe, a university administrator, fundraiser and — most taxing — mother of four boys, suffered a stroke, a cerebral hemorrhage. Since that time, she has been almost unable to speak.  

Before her stroke, my mother was the emotional center of a voluble and intellectual family. A president of the local Hadassah, active in a variety of community events, a rebbetzin in a large synagogue, her most adroit diplomacy was mealtime management. At our table, especially when we had others over to dinner, we (the four boys and my moderating father) would quip, argue, try to outdo each other, make heroic efforts to make the others laugh (special points if their mouths were full), and my mother would remind us to be kind to the hapless guests. Trained as a teacher, she taught each of us to read when we were small, and she made our dinner herself, despite volunteer commitments, every single night.  

This is not to say she was never sharp-tongued herself. Once my older brother Paul brought a girlfriend home from college. In the middle of dinner, he reminded my mother that she had promised to get him an electric blanket for the cold Philadelphia winter nights. Arching her eyebrow (my mother had eloquent eyebrows) she looked at my brother’s girlfriend and asked, “Do you want dual controls on that?”

I was in rabbinical school when everything changed. My mother screamed out my father’s name, collapsed and was rushed to the hospital. She spent weeks in a coma, then awoke. After an extended vigil in intensive care, she was periodically alert.  Her right side was immobile, and although she could make sounds, she could not really speak. It was as if her spirit was in there, trying to emerge, yet unable to force its way through. Her soul kept bumping up against walls it could not see, like a firefly in a glass jar. 

In time, we brought her home. Progress was slow. There were other effects of her stroke: emotionality that resulted in tremendous rage; the bewilderment of being betrayed by her own body. But those agonies were small compared to her inability to explain what she felt, to give voice to what was going on inside. Expressive aphasia impairs or destroys the ability to speak and process language. Syntax is garbled, the wrong words present themselves, simple expressions are mislaid in the mind and cannot be retrieved.

Occasionally, a word would emerge to explain the horror of her condition. Early on, after a good deal of struggle, she managed to pronounce something she had been trying to say for some time: “Prison.” She repeated it again and again with a sort of mantric regularity. Prison. Prison. Prison. 

Prison alternated with a nonsense word, a common symptom among victims of expressive aphasia. For almost a year, “kisskove” served as the catch-all for anything she wished to say. In moments of tenderness or fury, when words are just whips we use to lash or the cords we use to draw close, kisskove served as well as any other.


From left:  Gerald; Elaine, holding baby Danny, Paul; Steve; and David in a Wolpe family portrait. circa 1965.

Realizing at times just how wearying it could be on everyone to hear the same sound, my mother herself would make fun of it, raising and lowering her voice, wringing a few laughs from a situation at once tragic and absolutely ludicrous.  Gradually, over time, the word became less frequent, and then disappeared altogether.

Isolation became etched into my mother’s expression. Surrounded by those she loved, she was alone.  Hers is the language of pleading eyes. So often, we simply could not understand. The words of Rabbi Hama Ben Hanina in the Talmud proved apt: “God’s gift of the power of speech was as important as the creation of the world.” 

Decades have passed since the moment my mother’s words were stolen from her. Five years ago, my father died.  Not only did we all lose a wonderful, warm and eloquent man, but my mother lost the one who could give voice to her memories. My father knew more and shared more than anyone else; although he was frequently wrong, he was the likeliest to guess correctly what she intended to say. When he left, she not only lost her life mate, but her conduit to the world.  

Where is the mother’s voice in our history? In the Torah, we have moments when we hear the voices of our matriarchs and of Hannah and Naomi. But those moments are few; the voices of our female ancestors have been largely lost to us because their insights and ideas were not written down as were those of prominent men. Mothers determined much of our history in the way they raised children and in the influence they had on their husbands and communities, yet all too little was recorded of their teachings. The great Baruch Epstein, author of “Torah Temimah,” writes of his mother’s frustration in being barred from learning and teaching Torah. I have experienced the voice of my own mother disappearing, not through neglect or bias, but from tragedy.

The ability to follow a conversation, to read, to form clear opinions — all of these abilities were victims of my mother’s stroke as well.  Sometimes, even today, my mother is sharp as can be, nodding in agreement to a point, or vigorously disagreeing with a “No!” At other times, she cannot follow what is happening and lapses into resigned silence.

When I am with her, I recount what she has done for me in the past. In my mind, as in the memory of my brothers, my mother still stands, eyes covered, illuminated by Shabbat candles. She is spreading a white tablecloth, carrying a plate.  She is laboring over the Sunday Times crossword puzzle. My mother is the one who tried to get four boys to dress for synagogue (my father, the rabbi, left early to lead the service), and somehow got us there. 

Not always easy. Once, sitting next to her in synagogue, I saw on her face a look of amused despair. “What?” I asked. “Look down,” she said. I looked at my shoes. “I understand wearing two different socks, but David, this is the first time I have seen someone wear two different shoes!” One was black and one was brown. I weakly protested that I got dressed when it was barely light out. She, um, didn’t buy it.


Elaine Wolpe, March 2014.

Once, when I was in high school, I asked her if she deprived herself of anything for us. She pointed to my oldest brother, “This is my fur coat.” My second brother, “Here are my diamonds.” To me, “You are my precious gems.” And my younger brother, “And this is my fancy car.” She instructed us that she was so tired of hearing “Mom” all day long, that after 6 p.m., we were to call her “Matilda.”

My brothers and I all have memories of sitting next to her in synagogue, playing with her jewelry, asking for candy to keep us quiet, sitting at attention when my father spoke. My mother was very solicitous of my father’s dignity. If someone whispered while he was speaking, they had to endure a glare that would derail a freight train. Dress inappropriately, run in shul or fail to honor the rabbi and you would endure the full — and considerable — weight of my mother’s disdain. 

Each year, as Mother’s Day approaches, my brothers and I think anew about all she once was, and how much we lost when she was so grievously diminished. But certain moments remind us that the stroke did not steal her soul.

A few years ago, after my father died, the four of us gathered in Philadelphia for her birthday. We took my mother out to dinner in a local restaurant. After the meal, my brothers and I pulled out our credit cards. My mother looked at us with scorn, and loudly said, “No!”

We were shocked. Surely she didn’t think that we would let her pay for us? Dutifully, we put our cards away. She looked at us again, and crowed triumphantly, “Dessert!”

The Talmud speaks of honoring parents as the most difficult mitzvah. It can be burdensome; as comedian Roseanne Barr memorably reminded us, parents can push our buttons because they installed them. Some find it challenging, because parents can be unkind, heedlessly invasive, bruising in one way or another to their children. But it is also difficult to be near the sadness at the end of life, to share in the grief of a parent unable to fend for herself, a parent whose pain is palpable at each moment, in each look, with every unspoken word.

I could cry when I realize how hazy my memories have become of her speaking. Still, without speech, a lot of extraneous communication is burned away. My mother cannot relate many of the specifics of her day, and she grasps and remembers only a bit of what we tell her of ours. For all the essential tragedy of the second half of her life, however, she has given us the blessings of a Jewish mother — worried, warm, involved, emotionally intense, filled with expectations and standards and fire and dreams.  

And in return, through the quiet and pain of her life, her children and grandchildren never fail to tell her how much we love her.


David Wolpe is the rabbi of Sinai Temple. You can follow his teachings at facebook.com/RabbiWolpe.

The language of pleading eyes: A Mother’s Day story Read More »

The first Orthodox Jewish vendor at Wrigley Field

My recent story on Orthodox Jews who work as vendors at Wrigley Field — and their declining number — garnered a lot of attention among Chicago Cubs fans, including from many ex-vendors.

One of them, Michael Karlin, wrote me to share the story about how the whole phenomenon got started.

Karlin says he was the second-ever Orthodox vendor, back in the mid-1960s, and that he was turned onto vending by the pioneer in the field, Stewart Sheinfeld.

Here’s his story:

Dear Mr. Heilman,

Your recent piece on Orthodox vendors at Wrigley Field brought back very fond memories for me, having worked there for several years in the late 1960s and early 1970s.

You wrote that “no one seems to know quite how it began.” Well, I do, and I can fill you in. The first Orthodox vendor was Stewart Sheinfeld, a graduate of the Skokie Yeshiva class of 1967. Stewie, who unfortunately passed away earlier this year, was a great guy who somehow found out about the job and got it — it must have been in 1968. Being a classmate of Stewie, he later told me about it, and I then eagerly became the second Orthodox vendor.

We were both joined subsequently by Larry Hirsch, and the three of us comprised the first group of this great Chicago tradition. Interestingly, we tended to be among the top earners at the job, which follows a pattern of Orthodox Jews excelling in almost any profession — even beer vending!

Now living in Teaneck, N.J., where two of Stewie’s sons also reside, I can honestly state that vending at Wrigley Field still rates as the best job I ever had. I have many great memories of experiences on that job, besides making a lot of money (on a good day, we could earn over $100 way back in the early 1970s, after turning 21 and getting beer to sell). The Cubs had become a good team in 1969 (remember that awful collapse to the Mets?) and subsequent years, the crowds were big, the atmosphere was great, and nothing beat working there.

So, when anyone reminisces on the tradition of Orthodox vending at Wrigley Field (which should continue), they should also remember the grandfather of all this, one Stewart Sheinfeld, who started it. May Stewart be fondly remembered for this, as well as his many other accomplishments during his too short lifetime!

Wrigley Field. Photo by Bob Horsch

The first Orthodox Jewish vendor at Wrigley Field Read More »

Report: Jewish Ukrainian mayor regains consiousness

The Jewish mayor of Ukraine’s second-largest city regained consciousness in an Israeli hospital following what is believed to be an assassination attempt.

Gennady Kernes, who heads the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv, awoke Monday at the Rambam Health Care Campus in Haifa after two surgeries, Kharkov’s chief rabbi and Chabad emissary, Rabbi Moshe Moskovitz, told Chabad.org.

Kernes was shot in the neck on April 28 during his routine morning jog. He was airlifted to Israel for treatment.

Ukrainian officials reportedly have opened an investigation into the shooting.

Ukraine has seen deadly clashes between political opponents since the eruption in November of a revolution that started with protests over then-President Viktor Yanukovych’s perceived pro-Russian policies. Yanukovych was ousted from power in February and replaced with an interim government that has scheduled elections for next month.

Kernes reportedly has played a major role in the confrontations between pro-Ukrainian and pro-Russian forces in the city. He had been a supporter of Yanukovych and then changed his stance, saying he does not support the pro-Russia insurgents or the annexation of Ukrainian territory.

Several anti-Semitic attacks, including two stabbings and two attempts to torch synagogues, have occurred since November in Ukraine.

According to the Euro-Asian Jewish Congress, the 2009 election campaign in which Kernes became mayor was mired with anti-Semitic hate speech targeting him and other Jewish candidates.

Report: Jewish Ukrainian mayor regains consiousness Read More »

Ex-London mayor: Jews vote Conservative because they are rich

British Jews increasingly support the country’s Conservative Party because they are richer than they used to be, the former mayor of London said.

Ken Livingstone made the comment Monday on the BBC’s Newsnight program, during a discussion about how ethnic minorities vote.

He said that income, not minority status, determined a person’s voting preference.

“As the Jewish community got richer it moved over to voting for Mrs. Thatcher, as they did in Finchley,” he said, referring to former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s representation of the Conservative Party in the strongly Jewish district.

Adrian Cohen, chairman of the London Jewish Forum, criticized Livingstone in a statement to reporters: “It’s pretty obvious that politicians shouldn’t write off parts of the electorate based on crude assumptions about their perceived relative affluence.”

“Many Jews are not rich; indeed many struggle to make ends meet. In any event, there are many factors which influence how a person chooses to vote, and one shouldn’t refer to Jewish Londoners as if they were homogeneous,” he added.

Livingstone made a similar comment while running for mayor of London in 2012. He lost the race to incumbent Boris Johnson, who had succeeded him in the post.

Ex-London mayor: Jews vote Conservative because they are rich Read More »