Months of protesting, civil disobedience and international opprobrium have reached a seeming conclusion. Prime Minister Netanyahu has paused — at least for now — his government’s plans to reform the Israeli judiciary.
In other words, the great national showdown between protestors and the government has ended in victory for the protestors. This is, in my view, a sweet and an inspiring moment for Israeli democracy. After November’s election swept a frightening far-right slate of politicians into power, many Israelis and Jews around the world felt that we had entered a dark and hopeless chapter in Israeli history. Today, things feel different.
That said, this is also a vulnerable moment. The government is humiliated and supporters of the reform feel betrayed and resentful.
While the protest movement’s sense of triumph will quickly fade when new issues arise, the resentment of the right threatens to linger in the air for decades to come.
Moreover, while the protest movement’s sense of triumph will quickly fade when new issues arise, the resentment of the right threatens to linger in the air for decades to come.
One solution would be for the opposition — who mobilized an unprecedented movement to defeat judicial reform — to quickly reposition itself as champions of judicial reform.
This is for three reasons:
First, some of the right’s grievances towards the Israeli judiciary are legitimate. Most Israelis acknowledge this and the opposition can afford to admit it.
Second, a partial victory for all is better than a total victory for one side.
Third, this issue isn’t going anywhere. The right wants judicial reform and will continue to pursue it. Right now, with Bibi in retreat, the opposition has considerable power in determining what this reform looks like. In a few years, this might not be the case.
Recall the similarly controversial legislative showdown that took place surrounding the “Nation-State Law,” a basic law passed in 2018 which declares Israel to be the Nation-State of the Jewish people.
The Nation-State Law was on the right’s legislative wishlist for years before being passed. While many critics of the law call it discriminatory and undemocratic, it is quite easy to imagine worse versions of the Nation-State Law than the one we ended up with, which is largely symbolic. Indeed, one abandoned draft included a clause allowing for the creation of segregated communities.
Had the opposition succeeded in quashing the Nation-State Law in 2018, it might have found itself dealing with a far worse Nation-State Law penned by Ben-Gvir and Smotrich in 2023. In other words, a loss under favorable conditions might be a win in the long run.
Lest this victory be a pyrrhic one, the opposition should immediately reach out to the government and start working on a version of judicial reform that both sides can count as a win — a reform based on broad national consensus.
Conditions are favorable now. Lest this victory be a pyrrhic one, the opposition should immediately reach out to the government and start working on a version of judicial reform that both sides can count as a win — a reform based on broad national consensus. Only then will we have a chance of moving on from this matter.
Like the Nation-State Law, judicial reform has been on the right’s legislative wishlist for years. The controversial override clause may have become world famous in 2023, but it’s been on the docket since at least 2018. If we don’t deal with it now, it will surely come back to haunt us in another five years, and who knows who we will be dealing with when that day comes.
And so we protestors should adopt a new slogan to chant at our rallies: “Judicial reform is dead! Long live judicial reform!”
Matthew Schultz is the author of the essay collection “What Came Before” (2020). He is a rabbinical student at Hebrew College in Newton, Massachusetts.
Judicial Reform Is Dead. Long Live Judicial Reform
Matthew Schultz
Months of protesting, civil disobedience and international opprobrium have reached a seeming conclusion. Prime Minister Netanyahu has paused — at least for now — his government’s plans to reform the Israeli judiciary.
In other words, the great national showdown between protestors and the government has ended in victory for the protestors. This is, in my view, a sweet and an inspiring moment for Israeli democracy. After November’s election swept a frightening far-right slate of politicians into power, many Israelis and Jews around the world felt that we had entered a dark and hopeless chapter in Israeli history. Today, things feel different.
That said, this is also a vulnerable moment. The government is humiliated and supporters of the reform feel betrayed and resentful.
Moreover, while the protest movement’s sense of triumph will quickly fade when new issues arise, the resentment of the right threatens to linger in the air for decades to come.
One solution would be for the opposition — who mobilized an unprecedented movement to defeat judicial reform — to quickly reposition itself as champions of judicial reform.
This is for three reasons:
First, some of the right’s grievances towards the Israeli judiciary are legitimate. Most Israelis acknowledge this and the opposition can afford to admit it.
Second, a partial victory for all is better than a total victory for one side.
Third, this issue isn’t going anywhere. The right wants judicial reform and will continue to pursue it. Right now, with Bibi in retreat, the opposition has considerable power in determining what this reform looks like. In a few years, this might not be the case.
Recall the similarly controversial legislative showdown that took place surrounding the “Nation-State Law,” a basic law passed in 2018 which declares Israel to be the Nation-State of the Jewish people.
The Nation-State Law was on the right’s legislative wishlist for years before being passed. While many critics of the law call it discriminatory and undemocratic, it is quite easy to imagine worse versions of the Nation-State Law than the one we ended up with, which is largely symbolic. Indeed, one abandoned draft included a clause allowing for the creation of segregated communities.
Had the opposition succeeded in quashing the Nation-State Law in 2018, it might have found itself dealing with a far worse Nation-State Law penned by Ben-Gvir and Smotrich in 2023. In other words, a loss under favorable conditions might be a win in the long run.
Conditions are favorable now. Lest this victory be a pyrrhic one, the opposition should immediately reach out to the government and start working on a version of judicial reform that both sides can count as a win — a reform based on broad national consensus. Only then will we have a chance of moving on from this matter.
Like the Nation-State Law, judicial reform has been on the right’s legislative wishlist for years. The controversial override clause may have become world famous in 2023, but it’s been on the docket since at least 2018. If we don’t deal with it now, it will surely come back to haunt us in another five years, and who knows who we will be dealing with when that day comes.
And so we protestors should adopt a new slogan to chant at our rallies: “Judicial reform is dead! Long live judicial reform!”
Matthew Schultz is the author of the essay collection “What Came Before” (2020). He is a rabbinical student at Hebrew College in Newton, Massachusetts.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
“Ocean’s Eleven” May Yet Become “From the River to the Sea”
Fighting Antisemites by Getting Straight A’s
Harvard Commencement Roiled by Student Walkouts, Confrontation Involving Chabad Rabbi
Brandeis Center Sues Harvard Over Allegedly Ignoring, Tolerating Antisemitism on Campus
JPAC Advocacy Summit Draws 500 Community Members to Capital
The Modernist Novel You’ve Never Heard of: A Review of Blanche Bendahan’s “Mazaltob”
Culture
Jewish Brothers Find Out a Sinful Secret in New York Post Writer’s Debut Novel
Murray Kalis: Advertising, Food and Mexican No-Matzo Matzo Brei
Galit Levi on Her Decades-Long Career in Fashion and Pro-Israel Designs
New Intergenerational Cookbook Highlights Diversity and Connection
Second Pro-Palestinian Encampment at UCLA Dispersed
UCLA Chancellor grilled by House committee as new encampment was erected on campus.
Chosen Links by Boaz – Episode 1: Comedy Round Table
Radical Commitment
After October 7th we saw inspiring stories of radical commitment.
Ownership – A poem for Parsha Behar
I own a coffee mug and a pair of scissors…
A Bisl Torah – First, Look Inward
It is much easier to criticize and judge someone else than it is to be honest with one’s own misgivings
Hollywood
Spielberg Says Antisemitism Is “No Longer Lurking, But Standing Proud” Like 1930s Germany
Young Actress Juju Brener on Her “Hocus Pocus 2” Role
Behind the Scenes of “Jeopardy!” with Mayim Bialik
Podcasts
Murray Kalis: Advertising, Food and Mexican No-Matzo Matzo Brei
Eitan Bernath: Exploring the Jewish Kitchens of Mexico, Food on Social Media and Egg Salad
More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.