fbpx

Baker defends Obama’s move at UN

Former Secretary of State James Baker on Sunday defended the Obama Administration’s move at the United Nations Security Council against Israel last month.
[additional-authors]
January 9, 2017

Former Secretary of State James Baker on Sunday defended the Obama Administration’s move at the United Nations Security Council against Israel last month.

“It was former Prime Minister Ehud Barak of Israel who said Israel needs to make the tough decisions if it wants to avoid becoming an apartheid state,” Baker said in an interview with CNN’s Fareed Zakaria on Sunday. “And so that’s why I think it was appropriate in this instance for the United States to abstain.”

Citing the many instances past U.S. presidents decided not to veto UN resolutions on settlements, Baker asserted, “The reason I think settlements are a bad idea is that they tend to create facts on the ground which prohibit or prevent negotiating the status of that particular land according to the Land-for-peace provisions and requirements of the U.N. Resolutions 242 and 338. And if you create facts on the ground, there’s nothing, really, then left to discuss about trading land for peace.”

Baker, 86, was among the few Republican national security heavyweights who played a crucial role in convincing President-elect Donald Trump to pick ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson as his nominee for Secretary of State.

The former Secretary of State also expressed disapproval of Trump’s opposition to the UN vote and his plan to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

“The President-elect has said he would like to be the president that solves the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. And let’s hope he can do that,” Baker said. “But you can’t think you can succeed at that if you are, in effect, so biased one way or the other. You cannot be Israel’s lawyer and expect to solve the Palestinian-Israeli dispute. And so I hope he’s successful in doing it, but you have to be seen to be at least a semi-honest broker.”

“As to the U.N., things will be different after Jan. 20th,” Trump tweeted after the Security Council voted on Resolution 2334. “The big loss yesterday for Israel in the United Nations will make it much harder to negotiate peace,” the President-elect tweeted 24 hours later. “Too bad, but we will get it done anyway.”

According to Baker, “If [Trump] expects to solve this terribly difficult problem of Israeli-Arab conflict, he’s going to have to be seen to be somewhat of an honest broker or it isn’t going to happen.”

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Editor's Picks

Latest Articles

Sushi Day Recipes with Marisa Baggett

Whether you’re a longtime sushi lover or a newbie to preparing this creative cuisine, Baggett’s recipes are a delicious way to mark the holiday.

What Antisemitism Requires of Us

The current Jewish debate cannot end with a choice between fighting antisemites and strengthening Jewish life. Both are necessary, but neither fully answers what this moment requires.

Is History Asking Too Much of Us?

The question for the Jewish people today is not merely whether we believe in the future but whether we are willing to become the kind of people that the future requires.

Rosner’s Domain | Can Israel’s Image Be Fixed?

Israelis view themselves as fighting for survival, just, fair, moral and brave, while the rest of the world sees something else entirely, viewing Israel as a country that has lost its brakes, destabilizing the order and running amok without justification.

Nothing to Fear but Fear

If I toss out a can of baked beans that expired one day earlier for fear of botulism, what do you think goes through my mind when it comes to bears, mountain lions, sharks and rattlesnakes?

The Many-States Solution

As we weigh the benefits and downsides of a potential two-state solution, the unguaranteed but plausible prospect of an unprecedented regional peace should be considered as part of that discussion.

What Can AI Do for Us?

The question is not whether Jewish communities will use AI; they already are. The question is whether we will adopt these tools passively, or shape them deliberately according to Jewish values, Jewish learning, and Jewish responsibility.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.