fbpx

Baker defends Obama’s move at UN

Former Secretary of State James Baker on Sunday defended the Obama Administration’s move at the United Nations Security Council against Israel last month.
[additional-authors]
January 9, 2017

Former Secretary of State James Baker on Sunday defended the Obama Administration’s move at the United Nations Security Council against Israel last month.

“It was former Prime Minister Ehud Barak of Israel who said Israel needs to make the tough decisions if it wants to avoid becoming an apartheid state,” Baker said in an interview with CNN’s Fareed Zakaria on Sunday. “And so that’s why I think it was appropriate in this instance for the United States to abstain.”

Citing the many instances past U.S. presidents decided not to veto UN resolutions on settlements, Baker asserted, “The reason I think settlements are a bad idea is that they tend to create facts on the ground which prohibit or prevent negotiating the status of that particular land according to the Land-for-peace provisions and requirements of the U.N. Resolutions 242 and 338. And if you create facts on the ground, there’s nothing, really, then left to discuss about trading land for peace.”

Baker, 86, was among the few Republican national security heavyweights who played a crucial role in convincing President-elect Donald Trump to pick ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson as his nominee for Secretary of State.

The former Secretary of State also expressed disapproval of Trump’s opposition to the UN vote and his plan to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

“The President-elect has said he would like to be the president that solves the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. And let’s hope he can do that,” Baker said. “But you can’t think you can succeed at that if you are, in effect, so biased one way or the other. You cannot be Israel’s lawyer and expect to solve the Palestinian-Israeli dispute. And so I hope he’s successful in doing it, but you have to be seen to be at least a semi-honest broker.”

“As to the U.N., things will be different after Jan. 20th,” Trump tweeted after the Security Council voted on Resolution 2334. “The big loss yesterday for Israel in the United Nations will make it much harder to negotiate peace,” the President-elect tweeted 24 hours later. “Too bad, but we will get it done anyway.”

According to Baker, “If [Trump] expects to solve this terribly difficult problem of Israeli-Arab conflict, he’s going to have to be seen to be somewhat of an honest broker or it isn’t going to happen.”

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Editor's Picks

A Night of Gratitude Honoring Dennis Prager

Latest Articles

Rosner’s Domain: Weeks of Known Unknowns

So here we are, stuck with just a few bad options to consider. And that’s just the political superposition of undetermined future – alongside it there’s also the possible – probable? – war with Iran.

After the Last Out, Collect a Different Kind of Card

At a time when Jewish education is competing for attention in a world dominated by screens, sports, short-form videos and endless streams of content, these easily collectable cards offer a different kind of engagement.

6 Jewish Takeaways from the Midterm Elections

There is little chance that the combination of a weakened Trump and an emboldened Democratic Congress produces similar levels of support for aggressive action against Iran and its proxies, and other policies that a wide spectrum of Israelis see as crucial to their security.

Israel Drives Them Crazy

In the diaspora and in Israel, we cannot turn back the clock and undo the harm that was done to us. But we can shape our own future. Israel is strong and resolute. So must we be.

Torah Portion: Chayei Sarah

The Torah offers a comforting view of a life beyond this life. We aren’t told what it will be exactly — yes, it’s abstract and vague — but we are told it’s waiting for us as it was for Abraham.

Hatred Opened the Door. A Missed Victory Held It Open.

For me, the disaster isn’t that Democrats won or Republicans lost. It’s that politicians who demonize Israel, deny Jewish self-determination and explain away antisemitism are finding an increasingly receptive electorate in the world’s most important democracy.

The Jewish Dilemma

The central issue is not whether Jewish voters should support Democrats or Republicans. It is whether either party can demonstrate that Jewish security, Jewish identity and Jewish self-determination are compatible with its broader political agenda.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.