fbpx

October 27, 2020

Biden Illuminates FDR’s Relationship with Nazis

Regardless of the outcome of next week’s election, former Vice President Joe Biden will have the distinction of being the first American presidential candidate to draw attention to the U.S. government’s shameful record of friendly relations with Nazi Germany in the 1930s.

During the final presidential debate on October 22, President Donald Trump claimed that he has “a good relationship” with North Korea and argued that “having a good relationship with leaders of other countries is a good thing.” Former Vice President Biden retorted that “we had a good relationship with Hitler before he in fact invaded Europe.”

Biden’s assertion must have surprised many viewers of the debate, who likely assumed that because President Franklin D. Roosevelt led America in a war against Nazi Germany, he must have always been hostile to the Hitler regime. In fact, from the time FDR first took office in 1933, until America entered World War II in December 1941, the Roosevelt administration’s policy was to pursue cordial, sometimes even friendly, relations with the Nazi regime.

Many Americans boycotted products from Nazi Germany. But the Roosevelt administration helped Nazi Germany evade the boycott in the 1930s by permitting goods from Germany to bear labels that misled consumers as to their country of origin. The administration halted this disgraceful practice only when threatened with a lawsuit by boycott activists.

FDR also sent Secretary of Commerce Daniel Roper to address a pro-Nazi rally in New York City in 1933. At that rally, Nazi Germany’s ambassador to the United States was the keynote speaker and the podium and hall were decorated with swastika flags. In 1937, the administration sent one of its senior diplomats to represent the United States at the annual Nazi Party rally in Nuremberg.

In some instances, the Roosevelt administration actually apologized for U.S. citizens’ anti-Nazi sentiment. In 1935, the administration publicly apologized to Adolf Hitler after a New York City judge released protesters who tore a swastika flag off a visiting German ship. Then, in 1937, when New York mayor Fiorello La Guardia called Hitler a “brown-shirted fanatic who is threatening the peace of the world,” Roosevelt’s secretary of state expressed the U.S. government’s “regret” over “utterances calculated to be offensive to a foreign government.”

Roosevelt repeatedly compelled Secretary of the Interior Harold Ickes to remove critical references to Hitler from his speeches. For example, in the draft of his May 1935 commencement address at the University of Alabama, Ickes described universities in Nazi Germany as “mere bond slaves to a strutting and vainglorious Nazism” and those in Fascist Italy as “permitted to teach only what the government permits them to teach.” The White House informed Ickes that “it is the President’s request that the references to the foreign countries be entirely eliminated.”

Roosevelt repeatedly compelled Secretary of the Interior Harold Ickes to remove critical references to Hitler from his speeches.

Likewise, in November 1938, Ickes submitted to the White House a draft of his planned radio broadcast responding to the Nazis’ Kristallnacht pogrom against German Jews. “The draft as submitted was approved,” Ickes noted in his diary, “except that the President wanted us to cut out all references to Germany by name as well as references to Hitler, Goebbels, and others by name.”

President Roosevelt did not approve of Hitler’s anti-Jewish policies, but he feared that any U.S. criticism of the Nazi regime would harm American-German relations. In the 430 press conferences that FDR held from January 1933 until September 1938, he never criticized Hitler’s persecution of German Jews. In fact, the oppression of the Jews was mentioned in just one of those press conferences — and only because a reporter, not the president, raised it. Roosevelt replied that he had no comment and quickly changed the subject.

According to the research of Professor Stephen Norwood, the Roosevelt administration welcomed Nazi warships to visit American ports in the 1930s. Two German navy cruisers, the Karlsruhe and the Emden, were sent to visit the United States on multiple occasions between 1934 and 1936, in order — as the captain of the Karlsruhe put it — to “carry into the outside world something of the spirit of the New Germany.”

The Karlsruhe brought along 2,000 copies of Hitler’s Mein Kampf to distribute in the United States. The Nazis hoped these friendly naval visits would “end once [and] for all the rumors and propaganda which had been spread abroad” concerning the persecution of German Jewry. The Nazi warships were greeted by senior U.S. military and naval officers and were often accompanied by a twenty-one-gun salute. The U.S. navy even provided boats, personnel, and equipment to assist the Nazis in carrying out military exercises off the Los Angeles coast.

Sometimes FDR’s pre-war policy of maintaining good relations with the Nazis directly interfered with the rescue of Jewish refugees. In 1940–1941, the American journalist Varian Fry led an underground network in Vichy France that rescued more than 2,000 refugees — until Washington intervened. Responding to complaints by the Nazis and the Vichyites, the Roosevelt administration forced Fry to leave France on the grounds that he was “carrying on activities evading the laws of countries with which the United States maintains friendly relations.”

Franklin D. Roosevelt’s troubling policy towards Nazi Germany in the 1930s has received too little attention. Hopefully, Joe Biden’s remark will stimulate a long-overdue national conversation about this important topic.


Dr. Rafael Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies and author of more than 20 books about Jewish history and the Holocaust.

Biden Illuminates FDR’s Relationship with Nazis Read More »

Admin Says NYC Inspectors Were About to Issue Summons to Empty Jewish School

An administrator for a private Jewish school in Brooklyn has claimed that city inspectors were writing a summons for the empty school until he opened the school’s doors.

In a video that was posted to social media on October 26, the administrator shows a female inspector around Yeshivat Shaare Torah. The inspector said, “Obviously there’s nobody here.”

“So why are you writing me a summons?” the administrator, who filmed the encounter, asked.

“Please don’t record me,” the inspector responded.

“You’re giving me a summons outside,” the administrator retorted. “How can I not record you? If I hadn’t opened the door you would have put a summons on my door.”

The inspector then said that they have “a list” of schools to inspect in areas listed as red and orange under Democratic Governor Andrew Cuomo’s color-coded designation for COVID-19 restrictions. Schools in red and orange areas are not allowed to be open.

“We revisit these schools,” the inspector said. “If we find these schools are open, summons go out.”

The administrator again asked why a summons was being written outside, since nobody was inside the school. The inspector then stopped talking and was about to walk down the stairs when a male inspector asked why the school was open. The female inspector responded that it wasn’t.

“There’s only staff here, there’s no kids,” she said.

The administrator followed the female inspector as she walked down the stairs, stating, “Seems like you guys have a list that you just holding around giving summons to whether we’re open or closed.”

The female inspector then told her male colleague “to tell them that this gentleman is recording me.” The female inspector proceeds to tell someone on the phone that school isn’t open and the only people that are present are those doing administrative work.

The female inspector again told the administrator not to record them, prompting the administrator to respond: “You guys came in here to give me a summons without even checking the facts and I’m wrong for recording?”

https://twitter.com/SVNewsAlerts/status/1320797290299334659?s=20

https://twitter.com/SVNewsAlerts/status/1320798645382483971?s=20

A spokesperson from Mayor Bill de Blasio’s office told the Journal that the city does “not write summonses preemptively. An inspector came to inspect, and when no children were found inside, did not issue a summons.”

When the Journal told the school administrator this, he responded: “Maybe they usually don’t [write summons preemptively]. I wouldn’t know. But they did in this case — the video stands on its own merit.”

City officials say they reached out to the inspector in the video but haven’t heard back.

New York City Councilmen Chaim Deutsch and Kalman Yeger denounced the inspectors in the video.

“They made ZERO attempt[s] to confirm if the school was closed before writing the summons. (It WAS closed),” Deutsch tweeted. “This keeps happening-it’s not an isolated incident. Orthodox Jews continue to be targeted in NY.”

Yeger similarly tweeted, “This terror being inflicted on law-abiding New Yorkers by City Hall has sadly become standard. Here is a CLOSED school about to receive a summons. Fortunately, the Quota Agents were caught by school management. @NYCMayor de Blasio, this must stop NOW!!!”

 

The Sergeants Benevolent Association (SBA) police union also tweeted, “[De Blasio’s] been very consistent in targeting the Jewish Community! Anyone know why?” President Donald Trump retweeted the SBA’s tweet, boosting the audience it reached.

 

The incident at Shaare Torah occurred after the Brooklyn kosher café Mixed Greens was issued a summons for keeping their doors open, even though they weren’t allowing indoor dining. City Hall rescinded the citation upon review.

Admin Says NYC Inspectors Were About to Issue Summons to Empty Jewish School Read More »

Can 2020 Still Be Redeemed?

Whether you were worried about COVID-19 or a persistent hangnail, you probably made up your mind months ago that 2020 has been the worst year in recent memory — a completely irredeemable year, in fact.

I know I did. I gave up on 2020 during its first month, when, on January 27, former Lakers superstar Kobe Bryant, his daughter, and seven others perished in a helicopter crash in Calabasas. Ten months later, I’m still not over the loss of a man whom I had, for years, identified with strength, brilliance, and yes, even immortality.

It’s been a difficult year all around: Iran shot down a Ukrainian passenger plane, killing all 176 people on board; the nation became more divided than ever with the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump; devastating bushfires in many parts of Australia killed nearly 500 million animals; the United Kingdom withdrew from the European Union; floods in India, Nepal and China left hundreds dead and millions without homes; in Beirut, over 135 people were killed and 300,000 left homeless from multiple explosions due to unsafely stored ammonium nitrate; hundreds of protests erupted all over the country over the death of George Floyd in police custody in Minneapolis.

Oh, and did I mention the health and economic devastation of COVID-19? We didn’t even get a happy distraction from all this misery through sports and national pride, because the Summer Olympics in Tokyo were postponed due to the pandemic.

So yes, it’s been one hell of a year. But as far as things getting worse in 2020 are concerned, we’re just one week away from the definitive moment of damnation or redemption: the U.S. presidential election.

If you’ve been blaming everything on 2020, and on November 3rd, your candidate loses, this year is effectively over for you. But if he wins, you might tell every friend, mail carrier, and social media follower that 2020 was saved, after all.

In the miserable, partisan schism that has turned Americans against one another, this is what it’s all come down to: The only way 2020 can be redeemed for individual Americans is if half the population is pleased. That’s how intense everyone has become about this election.

And it does indeed seem like an existential election. Both sides perceive enormous stakes. Many of us are conducting relationships with family, friends, neighbors, and co-workers through the dangerously emotional, narrow prism of our lizard brains — the (oldest) part of the brain that responds to everything with fear and aggression. It’s almost election day and the komodo dragons are running the show.

It’s almost election day and the komodo dragons are running the show.

I may only be in my 30s, but I can’t recall a U.S. election whose anticipated results have been discussed with so many anxiety-inducing scenarios.

It used to be that Americans wondered whether they could pay off student debt or afford to buy a home under an incumbent administration or that of a challenger. But in this election, many of us are wondering whether we can even live in America anymore. That kind of existential thinking makes this election, and by extension, this year, seem even more dire.

I know the policies of whomever is elected president will affect us all at micro and macro levels. But let’s be real: Politics won’t redeem 2020 for most of us, because it is our family and friends whom we’ll have to see (or continue to reject) in 2021 and beyond — not the president, whether Trump or Biden.

The president, old or new, will be eating a sandwich in the Oval Office while our mothers and fathers cry in pain because we’ve stopped talking to them (they apparently didn’t vote for the “right” issues); the president will be enjoying a sunset outside the window of Air Force One while we and our one-time friends attack each other on the cowardly platforms of social media.

I even have friends — souls I’ve loved and cherished for years — who won’t talk to me because I expressed support for the Trump administration’s brokered peace between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and now, Sudan.

What they don’t realize is that, for me and many others, such welcome news was a much-needed balm on the open wound that is 2020. Allowing myself to see and celebrate the good helped me develop the metaphoric antibodies I needed to cope with this deeply unhealthy year.

We’re getting closer and closer to the imminent arrival of darkness. It’ll sneak up on us, depress us, and leave us wishing for the light of weeks past. I’m not referring to Daylight Savings Time, but to the November 3rd election. Of course, if your side wins, you will only see the light.

But regardless of which side wins, regardless of how we all perceive the stakes, there is still something even bigger at stake: our relationships — those messy, perfectly imperfect moments of connection, rupture, and reunification that give us life and, when nourished, a reason to live.

Maybe it’s too late to redeem 2020. But we can at least find small, but powerful ways to redeem one another.


Tabby Refael is a Los Angeles-based writer, speaker and activist.

Can 2020 Still Be Redeemed? Read More »

We Can’t Allow Zoom to Take Over Judaism: Why Leaders Must Think Out of the Digital Box

I’m constantly blown away by the power of technology to keep us connected with the world. Over these long quarantine months, like many others I’ve pretty much lived on Zoom, whether for meetings, lectures or family events. It was via Zoom that I witnessed my grandson’s brit milah in Israel.

Technology has so vastly improved that it has become ubiquitous and simple enough for anyone to use.

Which is why I’m concerned.

The amazing convenience of the digital world can lull us into a type of complacency. Slowly, without realizing it, we are using the technology so often and consistently that we may be giving it the power to change us.

I see signs of this everywhere, but especially in synagogue communities, where virtually all activities are now digital. The lethal threat of the COVID-19 virus, combined with the ease of Zoom, has made this digital transformation irresistible. But we must resist it.

Because although Zoom offers many benefits, it comes with a high price. For one thing, many communities have stopped seeing each other. Think about that. Computer screens have become our new gathering places. This is not something we should get used to.

COMPUTER SCREENS HAVE BECOME OUR NEW GATHERING PLACES. THIS IS NOT SOMETHING WE SHOULD GET USED TO.

I understand people who say: “What choice do we have? This virus is lethal. Our world is in lockdown.”

Yes, yes and yes, but we can and must aim higher.

We already know that outdoor is a lot safer than indoor. To bring back real human connection, we must put our creative hats on and develop a new “outdoor mentality.” Especially here in Los Angeles where the weather allows it, rabbis, leaders and program directors must think outdoor, outdoor, outdoor.

Orthodox communities already do that for prayer services, but I’m thinking beyond prayer.

Torah classes? Outdoor. Lectures? Outdoor. Concerts? Outdoor. Debate panels? Outdoor. Community meals? Outdoor. Visits to elderly homes? Outdoor.

We have enough park areas and private backyards throughout our communities that we can surely make this happen. Occasionally, why not plan events at the beach or in nature?

Some of these events can also be livestreamed, with tech experts ensuring that the sound quality is acceptable.

Innovative communities are already doing this. The more these outdoor events are seen, the more the idea will spread.

Outdoor events need not replace digital ones, but they would be a wonderful addition to the mix to bring people together. Of course, outdoor events take a lot more planning because of safety restrictions, but that’s hardly a reason not to offer them.

The point is this: Rabbis and local leaders need to create multiple opportunities for people to meet safely and to stay connected to the very idea of human connection. As we continue riding our digital runaway train, we are getting further and further away from the real stuff of life that no Zoom event can ever replace.

It is precisely because digital technology is so powerful that we must limit its power to isolate us. We must think out of the digital box before the box closes in on us.

We Can’t Allow Zoom to Take Over Judaism: Why Leaders Must Think Out of the Digital Box Read More »

Mideast Arms Race: Is Israel’s Qualitative Military Edge Eroding?

THE MEDIA LINE — Following the news of a massive F-35 fighter jet deal between the United States and the United Arab Emirates, Israeli Energy Minister Yuval Steinitz admitted that Israel has no power to prevent US sales of advanced weaponry to the Gulf states.

Steinitz, in an interview to Ynet on Sunday, explained that if countries such as Qatar and Saudi Arabia “want it and are willing to pay, no doubt that sooner or later they’ll get” stealth aircraft and other weapons systems.

The surprise statement, which may very well be a foreshadowing of things to come, was made as Israel continues to grapple with the revelation of the pending sale between the US and the UAE.

More important, reports continue to surface claiming Israeli officials, namely Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, knew of and approved the deal beforehand, but avoided informing defense officials before the normalization agreement between Israel and the UAE was finalized.

On Friday, Netanyahu released a statement saying Israel would not oppose the sale “of certain American weapons systems to the UAE,” thereby breaking from a long-standing Israeli policy.

The prime minister also claimed that news of the deal was broken to him only on Friday, by Alternate Prime Minister and Defense Minister Benny Gantz, who had returned from an urgent Washington meeting with Defense Secretary Mark Esper.

Fuming, Gantz immediately released a message of his own, essentially accusing Netanyahu of lying. “After the signing of the normalization accord with the UAE [on August 13], the defense minister discovered that parallel negotiations were being conducted for the sale of advanced weapons – a fact that was known to the Israeli officials involved, but hidden from the Defense Ministry,” Gantz said.

Prof. Eytan Gilboa, an expert on American-Israeli relations and US policy in the Middle East from the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, explains that “Israel has no real power to prevent these deals, but it can and did manage to change them in the past.

“The US has always looked to supply very sophisticated weapons, which nobody else can offer, to countries across the world, but Israel had opposed this, usually through the AIPAC lobby and through Congress,” Gilboa told The Media Line, noting that the formal opposition was a means of ensuring that Jerusalem would be compensated handsomely for any American-Arab arms deals.

Washington’s commitment to Israel’s qualitative military edge (QME) in the Middle East has been cemented in US law and has been maintained rigorously by all presidents and administrations for decades.

“This is a difficult equation to translate into real terms,” Gilboa stresses. “And the problem here is that Gantz got [to Washington] after Netanyahu had already agreed to the deal. That’s what happens when the prime minister does this kind of thing without consulting the military and Defense Ministry. [The Esper-Gantz meeting] should’ve been held before [the signing of the Abraham Accords], when Israel had more leverage, not after.”

Upon his return Friday, Gantz said he had secured from his American counterpart a reaffirmation of the US’s commitment to Israel’s military superiority. The two also discussed upgrades for the Israel Air Force, which Washington vowed to partially fund.

“This [F-35 jet] has a very unique system, not just the plane but the entire envelope. Its reconnaissance and combat abilities are unparalleled,” Gilboa says. “In the past, the US adjusted such weapons before selling them to Arab nations, and subtracted some abilities so that they would be inferior to the ones Israel received.”

Prof. Ephraim Inbar, president of the Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security, was blunter.

“Don’t think for a second this is the same F-35 that we got,” he told The Media Line.

“We have to admit: Part of the price of peace is that the Arabs receive American weapons,” Inbar continues. “It happened with Egypt and Jordan. It’s nothing new.

“America wants to sell; the military-industrial complex has a lot of sway and especially now, with the Trump Administration. So, they’ll compensate us with something based on the QME. But who knows what that means? That’s why they call it qualitative, not quantitative,” he jokes.

The weekend’s news aligns with reports from early August that claimed Netanyahu had agreed to greenlight the US-UAE arms deal and committed to not lobby Congress to oppose it, in return for the UAE’s agreement to recognize and normalize relations with Israel.

The prime minister denied the allegations and this week doubled down on his denial, claiming the F-35 sale was never officially part of the Abraham Accords.

Inbar sees the dispute between Gantz and Netanyahu as largely insignificant.

“That’s a domestic political issue, which shouldn’t have happened. But essentially, strategically, it doesn’t matter much,” he explains. “At the end of the day, the sale would’ve happened, unfortunately. It’s part of the package.”

Gilboa identifies another problem: the precedent it might set for other nations.

“The problem now is that Qatar, Saudi Arabia and others will also want [F-35 aircraft],” he predicts, adding that a Middle Eastern arms race is quite likely “now that that barrier is broken.”

Mideast Arms Race: Is Israel’s Qualitative Military Edge Eroding? Read More »

Sudanese Nationals in Israel Fear Deportation after Peace Deal

THE MEDIA LINE — As news spread Friday evening that Israel and Sudan would establish diplomatic relations, concern swept the Sudanese community in the Jewish state.

Their already uncertain fate – many entered the country illegally to seek refugee status or asylum – is now even more up in the air, with fears of deportation back to hot spots of genocide in Darfur, the Blue Nile region and the Nuba mountains.

“Safe is not a word I would use for Sudan,” Shira Abbo, spokesperson for Hotline for Refugees and Migrants, a Tel Aviv-based non-profit, tells The Media Line.

“There are attacks against refugees and displaced people returning to Sudan as they attempt to reclaim their land,” she says.

Usumain Baraka is a refugee activist from Darfur who has been living in Israel since 2008.

“People are saying that one of the first steps of peace is to deport Sudanese living in Israel back to Sudan,” he tells The Media Line. “[But] the situation there is the same as before. People are dying every day. The war and genocide continue. For us, going back is not an option.”

Baraka, who lost his father and older brother in a genocide that started in 2003, went to live in a United Nations-supported camp in Chad together with his mother, two sisters and a brother. In 2007, he and his mother began contemplating his life options: go back to Darfur to fight with rebel groups or make a life elsewhere and obtain an education.

According to Baraka, his mother told him to seek the normalcy and education he craved.

“Learn how to stop genocide without killing people,” she added.

“I was 13 years old and I didn’t fully understand what she wanted from me,” he says.

He eventually understood, and her words inspired a harrowing journey from Chad to Libya to Cairo, where he saw a television program about Jewish history. In it, an Israeli man explained how it took 40 years for the biblical Israelites to reach the Promised Land.

The man on TV also spoke about the Holocaust, something Baraka had never heard of but to which he felt an immediate connection.

The program spurred him and a friend to head to Israel, taking what he calls the “difficult way.”

A Bedouin guide dropped them in the Sinai, 25 miles from the Israeli border, because they lacked the money to go farther. They escaped gunfire from Egyptian soldiers before being rounded up by Israeli troops, who put them in a holding compound in the Negev.

A month and a half later, Baraka found himself in Beersheba, where he knew no one. Eventually, he was accepted to a religious boarding school, after which he earned both undergraduate and Masters degrees from the Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya.

Now he is worried that he will end up like friends of his who had reached Israel from South Sudan.

“I am scared, because… Israel deported South Sudanese back to South Sudan, where many lost their lives,” he says. “Some people who were lucky ran away to neighboring countries like Kenya and Uganda, where they started a new refugee journey.”

Baraka tells of hearing from relatives living in Sudanese camps.

“They confirm that it is still dangerous, especially for people like me who were activists against the government,” he states.

On numerous occasions, Israel has tried to deport Sudanese and other African nationals who are in the country illegally.

“These people have been in Israel for [some] 10 years, and at the beginning, the country denied them access to the asylum system,” Abbo relates, adding that applications for asylum began being accepted only in 2013.

“The simple reason for this is even Israel’s broken asylum system knows that people fleeing genocide are refugees,” she adds.

Baraka wants ties between Israel and Sudan that will eventually extend to diplomatic relations – but only when Khartoum stops the genocide.

“My dream is normalization between the two countries, but they [the Israelis] have to know when, with whom and how to do it,” he says.

Monim Haroon came to Israel in 2012 after fleeing Darfur over his criticism of the Sudanese government. He was held in a detention center before being released. He was eventually granted asylum in December 2017.

Haroon describes as “complicated” the feelings of Sudanese nationals toward possible ties between Israel and Sudan.

“I was one of the student activists calling for normalization between Israel and Sudan when I was in Sudan, and to see this happening is a historic step. [But] some are worried because of the [Israeli] government’s [apparent] intent to deport asylum seekers,” he tells The Media Line.

“I think it will be very hard for Israel to file orders to deport us from Israel,” he continues.

“First, there is no change… regarding the reasons that led us to flee our country and become refugees in Israel. Second, normalization doesn’t mean deportation,” he says.

“There are Sudanese in England and other European countries that have diplomatic relations with Sudan, but they are still considered asylum seekers,” he notes.

Haroon believes the Israeli government now has an important role to play in ending the ethnic violence in his home country.

“What we are trying to tell Israeli society and the government is [the refugees] are a result of terrible policies by the Sudanese government against us and our families,” he says.

“We went through genocide, ethnic cleansing [and] mass rapes of our sisters and mothers,” he goes on.

“We want [Israel] to understand that this is what is [still] happening in the Blue Nile, the Nuba Mountains and Darfur, and we want [it] to help us stop this tragedy,” he says.

He notes that this would be in Israel’s own interest.

“Once the genocide is stopped,” Haroon says, “people will voluntarily return to Sudan.”

Sudanese Nationals in Israel Fear Deportation after Peace Deal Read More »

Israeli Company Successfully ‘Freezes’ Breast Cancer Tumors

THE MEDIA LINE — The Israeli med-tech company IceCure Medical has reported “very promising” early results in clinical trials of its innovative breast cancer treatment, which relies on a liquid nitrogen technology to freeze tumors and destroy abnormal tissue.

The firm is nearing completion of a major clinical trial in hospitals across the United States where it has already treated hundreds of women.

“The US market for breast cancer treatment is our unique value proposition,” Eyal Shamir, CEO of IceCure Medical, told The Media Line.

“Mid-next year, we are going to present the interim result of our Ice3 trial, which has 206 patients in 19 hospitals,” he added. “The current results are pretty promising.”

Founded in 2006, IceCure is headquartered in the coastal city of Caesarea.

The innovative process of using extreme cold to destroy tissue is known as cryoablation therapy.

IceCure’s ProSense system, which features a hollow needle, relies on liquid nitrogen to help it quickly reach a temperature of -170°C(-274 F), according to the company. Once cold, the needle is inserted directly into a tumor to kill the abnormal tissue.

IceCure Medical’s ProSense machine. (Courtesy)

“We are basically covering the tissue with an ice ball,” Tlalit Bussi Tel-Tzure, vice president of business development and global marketing at IceCure, explained to The Media Line during a recent demonstration.

“No tissue can survive such a low temperature,” she explained. “Once the tissue is dead, it will dissolve in the body in a natural process and be absorbed in the body in a couple of weeks.”

One of the primary benefits of cryoablation therapy is that it is a minimally invasive procedure that can be carried out either at a doctor’s office or an outpatient facility, with no general anesthesia needed.

With regard to breast cancer, the process takes less than an hour and does not change the appearance of the breast, unlike traditional surgeries, such as lumpectomies.

Cryoablation has been used to treat various types of cancers, including bone, cervical, kidney, liver and lung cancer. However, because the technology is still very new, Bussi Tel-Tzure says it will take time for medical professionals to widely adopt it.

“Especially when we treat cancer, we have to complete five years of follow-up in order to conclude that it is a safe and effective solution,” she noted. “But based on the information we have from Japan and other parts in the world, we can say that the results are very promising.”

Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, IceCure has continued to expand into new markets, having last week received regulatory approval in both Taiwan and Russia. The company is already active in several countries throughout Europe, as well as in Mexico.

IceCure is not the only firm studying the effects of cryoablation on breast cancer. California-based Sanarus Technologies is conducting a clinical trial in the US, known as the FROST Trial.

IceCure has already received clearance from the US Food and Drug Administration to treat kidney and liver cancers with the technology. It is hoping to receive federal approval for use against breast cancer soon.

IceCure Medical’s ProSense machine, which uses liquid nitrogen to freeze tumors. (Courtesy)

The Ice3 trial so far has focused on early stages of malignant tumors in low-risk candidates.

“Our main vision is to become the gold standard in breast cancer treatment,” Shamir said. “Most of the cases where you have good early detection are small tumors, considered early stage, and the only treatment available today is surgery.”

Breast cancer is the most common cancer for women (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers), with over two million cases diagnosed worldwide each year, according to the World Cancer Research Fund. In fact, an estimated 1 in 8 American women will develop the disease.

“The importance of early screening is crucial when it comes to breast cancer, and given the fact that October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month, we want to increase awareness to do early screening,” Bussi Tel-Tzure stressed.

“The sooner the screening or the diagnosis is done, the sooner the tumor will be discovered and the more efficient our treatment will be,” she said.

Dr. Richard E. Fine is director of education and research at the Margaret West Comprehensive Breast Center in the US state of Tennessee. He has been performing breast surgery since 1988 and is the principal investigator for the Ice3 Trial, and calls the initial results “very encouraging.”

While it cannot replace all forms of treatment, Fine believes cryoablation can transform the lives of millions of women.

“We’re not removing any volume from the breast, so the cosmetic result is very nice. Patients go back to pretty much normal activity,” he told The Media Line.

“This could have a major impact,” he continued. “It lets patients go back to work, to their home, their family, and will actually decrease costs.”

Fine notes that more and more women have been postponing doctor’s visits and mammograms in recent months out of fear of contracting COVID-19, something he calls a mistake.

“We do not want to delay the early detection of breast cancer, so we very much encourage women to have their mammograms,” he emphasized.

Israeli Company Successfully ‘Freezes’ Breast Cancer Tumors Read More »

What Happened When a High School Offered a Conservative Video

As far as HuffPost and the rest of the American left are concerned, no non-left-wing idea should be allowed to enter an American school. Not even for five minutes.

This past month, Maumee High School, a high school near Toledo, Ohio, offered its students a way to receive some extracurricular credit. In the words of the Maumee City Schools administration office — released before the HuffPost-induced uproar:

“Students were offered an extra credit assignment intended to challenge their critical thinking skills … A second option in the extra credit assignment asked students to view a video from a conservative website, analyze it and explain what they may have learned from it, and how it may have challenged or supported their own beliefs. …

“We believe that students deserve a balanced presentation of materials and we support our educators in using a variety of instructional tools and materials in their teaching, expecting them to always exercise good judgement.”

In an open and liberal society, the stated aims of Maumee High School are not only not controversial but also laudable. They are exactly what good parents and educators would want for students.

So, who finds these aims revolting?

Only an anti-liberal ideology. Namely, the left.

It all started with one — yes, one — parent. She so objected to a PragerU video being offered as a conservative option that she withdrew her child from the class. And then she contacted HuffPost.

Thus began a national left-wing uproar over students being offered extra credit if they chose to view a five-minute conservative video.

The HuffPost headline: “Videos From Right-Wing Site That Preaches ‘The Left Ruins Everything’ Assigned In Ohio School.”

A few observations about the headline:

First, on the left, everything nonleft is “right-wing.” The reason? Because “conservative” is not inflammatory enough.

on the left, everything nonleft is “right-wing.” The reason? Because “conservative” is not inflammatory enough.

Second, the video “The Left Ruins Everything” was never “assigned.” No specific video was assigned.

Third, the HuffPost writer, Rebecca Klein, chose the most controversial title she could find out of approximately 450 PragerU videos.

Fourth, the video makes clear that it is about leftism, not liberalism.

Fifth, ironically, this whole story validates the video: Look at what the left is doing to schools, to liberal education and to open inquiry.

As the HuffPost itself reported:

“Andrea Cutway, the mother of 16-year-old student Avery Lewis, brought the assignment to the attention of Maumee City Schools administrators and immediately pulled her daughter out of the class. … Lewis was immediately alarmed when she started her extra credit assignment last week. The assignment asked her to watch PragerU videos and then answer questions about how the videos challenged her beliefs. … Cutway, Lewis’ mother, was similarly shocked when her daughter showed her the assignment. … ‘It’s ALT RIGHT propaganda,’ Cutway said in the email to the school principal.

“Lewis met with school administrators soon after to discuss the issue. Together, they came up with a solution — that the student could also include viewpoints from the opposite side, Cutway said.

“For Cutway, though, this ignored the larger issue — that PragerU videos be assigned at all and that school administrators did not see a problem (italics added) …

“‘When I talked to the principal and vice principal, they acted like this was just another assignment,’ said Cutway, who works as a juvenile parole officer for the state. … ‘This really is some scary stuff,’ Cutway said of PragerU. ‘I do feel like they have found a way to get into the public school system.'”

As a result of the HuffPost article, mainstream media went nuts, contemplating the possibility that American students might watch five minutes of non-left thought.

NBC TV in Toledo tweeted:

“HuffPost reports that a Maumee High School class is offering students extra credit for viewing videos from a right-wing source. Are you a Maumee parent? How would you feel about this?”

ABC TV in Toledo headlined:

“Maumee parent raises concerns over controversial assignment.”

And the station broadcast a report on “Maumee High School alumni petition politics in the classroom” about more than 200 alumni objecting to the use of any PragerU video. The broadcast featured a 2001 graduate of the school, Catherine Wood, the organizer of the petition, who told the ABC-TV station, PragerU videos “kind of deny the humanity of many groups of students: people of color, women, LGBTQ members.”

Catherine Wood lied. There is nothing in any PragerU video that demeans or in any way “denies the humanity” of people of color, women or LGBTQ members. Not to mention that we have women, people of color and gays presenting videos. Her libel exemplifies something I have said all my life: Truth is not a left-wing value.

There is nothing in any PragerU video that demeans or in any way “denies the humanity” of people of color, women or LGBTQ members. Not to mention that we have women, people of color and gays presenting videos.

But left-wing lies often work. Within days, the inevitable took place. As The Toledo Blade headlined: “Maumee Removes Conservative Content From Class Syllabus.”

For the record, here is a small sample of PragerU presenters:

Four Pulitzer Prize-winning journalists.

Three former prime ministers — of Denmark, Spain and Canada.

Professors at MIT, Stanford, Harvard, Princeton, Vanderbilt and many other universities.

The late Charles Krauthammer.

At least four “Never Trumpers” (George Will, Bret Stephens, Jonah Goldberg and Michael Medved).

Liberal Democrat Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz.

Jewish historian Rabbi Joseph Telushkin.

Wall Street Journal columnists Kimberley Strassel and Jason Riley.

Economists Lee Ohanian (University of California, Los Angeles) and Walter Williams (George Mason).

British historians Paul Johnson, Andrew Roberts and Niall Ferguson.

Mike Rowe of “Dirty Jobs” fame.

Philip Hamburger, the Maurice and Hilda Friedman Professor of Law at Columbia Law School.

Peter Caddick-Adams, fellow of the Royal Historical Society.

Five-time Emmy award-winning journalist Sharyl Attkisson.

Dr. Stephen Marmer, psychiatrist and clinical faculty at UCLA Medical School.

Would any of these people join PragerU if it were a “right-wing, ALT-RIGHT demeaner of people of color, women, and LGBTQ”? (Incidentally, PragerU has a video titled “What Is the Alt-Right.” Those of the left accusing PragerU of “alt-right propaganda” would do well to watch it.)

Moreover, PragerU has videos on happiness, forgiveness, the ethics of speech, the Ten Commandments, anger management and raising good children, among many others that have nothing to do with politics.

But none of this matters to HuffPost or to the 200 alumni of Maumee High School.

All that matters to them is that an effective, responsible, thoughtful conservative voice never be heard at Maumee or any other high school.

Probably a thousand teachers have shown PragerU videos, and many more are refusing to be intimidated by the bullies of the left.

Leftists fear that five minutes of conservative thought will undo four years of left-wing teaching.

Their fear is justified. Their opposition isn’t.


Dennis Prager is a nationally syndicated radio talk show host, president of PragerU and author of “The Rational Bible.” Copyright 2020 creators.com. Reprinted with permission.

What Happened When a High School Offered a Conservative Video Read More »

david suissa podcast curious times

Pandemic Times Episode 99: When Corona Meets a Chronic Illness

New David Suissa Podcast Every Tuesday and Friday.

A poignant story that captures our pandemic times, by Karin Katz.

How do we manage our lives during the coronavirus crisis? How do we keep our sanity? How do we use this quarantine to bring out the best in ourselves? Tune in and share your stories with podcast@jewishjournal.com.

Pandemic Times Episode 99: When Corona Meets a Chronic Illness Read More »

Lawsuit Filed Over ‘Borat’ Sequel Synagogue Scene Dismissed

Sacha Baron Cohen’s hilarious “Borat Subsequent Movie Film” is a smash hit for Amazon, but not everyone is laughing, including unsuspecting civilians who were fooled into participating in it, including a Holocaust survivor who appeared with Cohen in a scene set in a Marietta, Ga. synagogue.

In the scene, Borat is dressed in an anti-Semitic disguise and chats up an elderly Jewish woman, Judith Dim Evans, who was under the impression that she’d be participating in a serious documentary about the Holocaust. Evans assures the clueless Borat that the Shoah did indeed happen, and the prankster and the bubbe embrace. Evans passed away earlier this year, but her estate filed a lawsuit against Amazon and Oak Spring Productions, alleging that they appropriated Evans likeness.

Evans’ daughter, Michelle Dim St. Pierre, filed an injunction on Oct. 13, seeking to force producers to remove her mother from the film. “Upon learning after giving the interview that the movie was actually a comedy intended to mock the Holocaust and Jewish culture, Ms. Evans was horrified and upset,” the lawsuit states. “Had Ms. Evans been informed about the true nature of the film and purpose for the interview, she would not have agreed to participate in the interview.”

But a Fulton County judge dismissed the lawsuit, and St. Pierre dropped the case. “Sacha Baron Cohen was deeply grateful for the opportunity to work with Judith Dim Evans, whose compassion and courage as a Holocaust survivor has touched the hearts of millions of people who have seen the film,” Amazon’s attorney Russell Smith said in a statement. “Judith’s life is a powerful rebuke to those who deny the Holocaust, and with this film and his activism, Sacha Baron Cohen will continue his advocacy to combat Holocaust denial around the world.”

Cohen dedicated the film to Evans’ memory in a title card that runs at the end of the film.

Lawsuit Filed Over ‘Borat’ Sequel Synagogue Scene Dismissed Read More »