fbpx

June 22, 2016

Jewish PAC to press Republicans to call West Bank ‘Jewish homeland’

A Jewish political action committee is seeking to get the Republican Party platform to recognize the West Bank as an “indigenous” part of the Jewish homeland.

“The Land of Israel is the indigenous homeland of the Jewish people by right and by law and we oppose any measures to force, coerce or otherwise impose a security ‘solution’ or artificial borders on the Jewish state,” says the language proposed by Iron Dome Alliance. “We recognize an undivided Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and Judea and Samaria as integral parts of the indigenous Jewish homeland.”

The “Land of Israel” generally refers to the State of Israel and territories it controls. Judea and Samaria are the biblical names commonly used in Israel to designate the West Bank, an area where Israel has expanded Jewish settlement over the decades but which it has never formally annexed. Israel has annexed Jerusalem and, unlike in the West Bank, has extended some rights conferred on Israelis to its Palestinian residents.

The Iron Dome Alliance released the language on June 16, offering it for incorporation into both major parties’ platforms. Its chairman, Jeff Ballabon, told the Forward Wednesday that its emphasis would be on the Republican Party, in part because the party is more attuned to conservative pro-Israel positions and in part because the presumptive presidential nominee, Donald Trump, is an iconoclast.

“Someone who likes to succeed won’t agree to go down the road of something that has failed and failed again and again,” said Ballabon, a longtime Republican activist in the Orthodox Jewish community, told the newspaper. “The idea of taking a new look at this is very important.”

The Republican Party currently favors a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, albeit in terms – like those in the current Democratic Party platform – that frame it as key to Israel’s security and well-being.

The Democratic Party’s platform drafting committee is grappling with proposals, backed by appointees named by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., to make the language more sympathetic to Palestinian concerns.

Jewish PAC to press Republicans to call West Bank ‘Jewish homeland’ Read More »

Jewish progressive org invokes Freedom Summer murders to protest Trump

The heat wave had broken by the time Pastor Cue Jn-marie stood up June 21 at the auditorium of Pan Pacific Park in the Fairfax District before a mostly-Jewish audience of about 40. But as he spoke, his anger seemed to boil over.

The Skid Row pastor delivered a fiery speech at the death anniversary, or yarzheit, of three civil rights activists, two Jews and an African American, who were abducted and murdered by the Ku Klux Klan in Mississippi during the Freedom Summer of 1964 while organizing for the Congress of Racial Equality.

“The blood of Martin Luther King cries to god,” Jn-Marie intoned, more slam poet than pulpit priest. “The blood of [Andrew] Goodman, [Mickey] Schwerner and [James Earl] Chaney still cries to god today.”

Behind him on the ground, a sign read “Jews Reject Trump” above the hasthag #WeveSeenThisBefore, a nod to Nazi rhetoric in Europe and state-sanctioned racism in the U.S.

The event had a dual purpose, serving as a “vigil and a protest” against “Donald Trump and the politics of hatred and exclusion,” according to Rabbi Aryeh Cohen, the local rabbi-in-residence for the progressive group Bend the Arc Jewish Action, known simply as Bend the Arc, which organized the event.

The progressive Jewish group hosted similar events across the country, including in New York City, San Francisco and Washington, D.C.

“Today we’re saying that in memorializing Chaney, Goodman, and Schwerner, we are also signing our commitment in the future to make sure that Trump never gets near the White House,” he told the Journal.

Locally, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), a civil rights organization founded by King, co-sponsored the event with Bend the Arc, whose name is derived from a King quote.

Cohen spoke along with Jn-marie, William Smart, Southern California president of SCLC, Wilshire Boulevard Temple’s Rabbi Susan Goldberg, Adrian Dove, a man in his seventies who organized alongside the three murdered activists in Mississippi, Ameena Mirza Qazi, the executive director of the National Lawyers Guild Los Angeles, who wears a hijab, and Bend the Arc chair Stephen Rohde, a local constitutional lawyer.

Aviva Rosenbloom, cantor emeritus at Temple Israel of Hollywood, led the audience in a kaddish prayer for the activists and in song. As attendee disbanded, Bend the Arc organizers handed out candles, traditionally lit on the eve of a yarzheit, decorated with the faces of the three men.

Jewish progressive org invokes Freedom Summer murders to protest Trump Read More »

Harris Newmark: The Jewish father of L.A.

With resolute eyes, a large portrait of the Jewish pioneer businessman and chronicler Harris Newmark gazes across a hall in the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles. It’s a space dedicated to how L.A. became a great city, and with this image, Newmark welcomes visitors to trace the story of his remarkable influence on the development of Southern California.

This year marks the centennial of the death of the wholesaler, real estate investor and tzedakah enthusiast, who died April 4, 1916, at 81. Yet the formal portrait, while it conveys a quiet dignity, does not allow the viewer even a glimmer of Newmark’s verve and acumen. Hanging by his side, an equally impressive portrait of Sarah, Harris’ wife, who died in 1910, completes the image of a couple who helped bring to life several Jewish institutions still with us today, among them the city’s first Jewish cemetery and a home for Jewish orphans. The couple also are the patriarch and matriarch of several lines of descendants who to this day strive to keep their memory alive.

Harris Newmark (r) and his wife, Sarah.

Harris Newmark’s great-grandson, Dr. Harris Newmark III, is a student of his ancestor’s achievements; he loves to talk of how his great-grandfather was “influential in early Los Angeles history,” and “very prominent as a businessman and in real estate.”

“He was involved in civic activities and in Judaism,” said Newmark, a Los Angeles radiologist, who maintains a collection of books, clippings and family photos documenting his heritage.

One day before the 100th anniversary of his great-grandfather’s death, Harris Newmark III (friends and family call him Nick), pausing from his review of family memorabilia, decided it was time to pay his great-grandfather’s gravesite a visit. On that bright spring day, Harris III and his wife, Carole, and son, Harris Kent Newmark IV, took a drive to the Home of Peace Cemetery in East Los Angeles, bringing along this writer. After a brief stop at the cemetery office and listening to the director’s instructions of “you can’t miss it,” the Newmark family headed to the center of the memorial park, past headstones and memorials, until they came to a small, temple-like stone structure, a mausoleum engraved with the name “Newmark.”

Home of Peace is the final resting place for many famous historic Los Angeles Jews. However, on a Wikipedia list of “notable interments” at the cemetery that includes Rabbi Edgar Magnin, Jack L. Warner, Louis B. Mayer, Carl Laemmle, Fanny Brice and two of the Three Stooges — Curly and Shemp Howard — as well as 19th-century merchant Solomon Lazard, Harris Newmark’s name has somehow been lost.

After so many generations and layers of asphalt, have Newmark’s contributions to L.A. vanished from our memories, as well? A small continuation high school, recently relocated to the Belmont High School campus, bears his name, but unlike other Los Angeles pioneers, among them Prudent Beaudry — L.A.’s 13th mayor, from 1874-76, who has a downtown thoroughfare named after him — no major street, post office, courthouse, park or square has been named for Newmark, except a one-block, very pedestrian street mall in Montebello.

Nevertheless, his legacy builds.

He “was one of the leading figures in developing the city,” said an April 5, 1916, obit in the Los Angeles Times. Harris Newmark “was one of a thinning band of pioneers who helped so materially to make Los Angeles what it is,” and “he was a remarkable man in many ways and proved it by rising from the bottom of the commercial ladder here to its top,” reported the same piece. Upon his passing, the city’s leading Jewish newspaper of that time, the B’nai B’rith Messenger, said, “For the last twenty years or so, when institutions for benevolence began to increase and multiply in our midst, Mr. Newmark was always among the first and most liberal contributors.”

Newmark was born in 1834 in Loebau, West Prussia. Having received a letter from his brother J.P. Newmark asking him to join him in San Francisco, Harris arrived first in New York, in 1853. From there, en route to California via steamer, he traveled to Nicaragua and crossed the isthmus on foot, mule and horseback. Arriving at the Pacific coast, he then took a steamer to San Francisco, stayed a short time, and then, finding there was no stagecoach line to Los Angeles, took another steamer down the coast, reaching San Pedro on Oct. 21, 1853. When he arrived, he was 19 and spoke neither Spanish nor English.

Harris Newmark (left) with his son Marco and his wife, Sarah in 1905.  

While getting established, Newmark contributed to the business life of the young city as one of the organizers of Los Angeles’ Chamber of Commerce. To aid that commerce and the overall development of the city, he promoted to Collin P. Huntington of the Southern Pacific Railroad, a route that would bring the railroad to Los Angeles. Having an interest in bookstores, libraries and periodicals, Newmark helped found the Los Angeles Public Library, as well as the Los Angeles Library Association, in 1872.

Harris and Sarah Newmark sit on the steps of their summer home on Ocean Avenue in Santa Monica in the early 1900s.  Photo courtesy of  Western States Jewish History

When, on July 2, 1884, the Hebrew Benevolent Society of Los Angeles was incorporated for the purpose of procuring land to establish a Jewish cemetery, Harris Newmark’s name appeared on its charter. Sarah Newmark, his first cousin, whom he married in 1858 (on the ketubah we find that Newmark’s Hebrew name was Tzvi), had planned a new Southern California Home for Jewish Orphans (what today is Vista Del Mar Child and Family Services), and after her death, Newmark donated the land for the building and broke ground for it, turning the first shovelful of earth.

Beyond making Los Angeles history, Newmark, the chronicler, has helped shape forever the way we see the city. A century after his passing, his book of reminiscences, “Sixty Years in Southern California,” remains an invaluable account of early California life. (It is available as a reprint from Forgotten Books.) 

“When I came, Los Angeles was a sleepy, ambitionless adobe village with very little promise for the future,” Newmark wrote. In the more than 700 pages of the book, which was edited by his sons Maurice and Marco (sources agree that advisory editor J. Perry Worden also played a substantial role), we follow chronologically Newmark’s anecdotes, observations and re-enactments. He shows us how a village of adobe and outdoor plumbing transforms into a city of bricks and water mains. How, over time, gas lamps become electric.

A village of only around 1,600 when Newmark arrived, we watch Los Angeles grow into a city of nearly 500,000, stretching from the mountains to the sea, with a port and a railroad. Although the built environment is vastly different, through Newmark’s eyes we recognize the terrain and conditions we know today. Newmark describes for us the devastating floods, and years of drought. He tells us about days of blazing sunshine, and a rare day when hailstones rattle windows. Like us, he enjoyed his summer days in Santa Monica, although he spent his at his summer home. Of the earthquake on July  11, 1855, he wrote a line that still gives us the shakes: “Almost every structure in Los Angeles was damaged.”

Newmark’s book “fills a big gap in the historiography,” said Karen Wilson, historian and graduate career officer in the UCLA History Department, speaking of the period that “Sixty Years” covers, from 1853 to 1913.

On the nightly news nowadays, we see L.A. as a place for smash-and-grab robberies, gang violence and freeway chases; from Newmark’s time in the mid-1800s, we see Los Angeles as a place where desperadoes and “banditos” attacked, runaway horses galloped through downtown streets, and frontier justice was dispensed at the hands of a lynch mob. Los Angeles was a dangerous place, according to the book, including gunfights on the streets. “Human life at this period was about the cheapest thing in Los Angeles, and killings were frequent,” Newmark wrote. Not so unlike the celebration of the new year in certain areas of the city today, the first New Year’s Eve Newmark spends in L.A. “was ushered in with the indiscriminate discharging of pistols and guns.”

It was also a time when Los Angeles, like today, was a very bilingual place. When Newmark opened his first business, selling dry goods in 1854 — after working as a clerk for his older brother, Joseph Phillip (J.P.) Newmark, whom he bought out after 10 months — Spanish was very much one of the languages of commerce. It was a town where in some public schools, the instruction was in Spanish and English, and public notices were posted in two languages. To get ahead in business, Newmark learned the languages of his customers and got to know their needs.

“He could function in Spanish and other languages, as well,” in a place where “bilingualism was important,” said Wilson, who curated the 2013-14 “Jews in the Los Angeles Mosaic” exhibition at the Autry Museum. Newmark was also multicultural and cosmopolitan, she added. In “Sixty Years,” we find the German Jew expressing his fondness for fiestas and his admiration of “tamales, enchiladas and frijoles,” and discovering part of his business success comes from successfully trading with Christians and Mormons, as well as Jews. He is a Mason and an Oddfellow, as well as a droll observer of the odd characters he finds on the streets.

He saves his profits, does his own books and sweeps up. At different points in his business career, he sold clothing, dry goods, hides and wool, and bought and sold real estate. He often worked with partners, and opened H. Newmark and Co. in 1865 in response to a boast by Prudent Beaudry “that he would drive every Jew in Los Angeles out of business.” Initially selling “flour, sugar, potatoes, salt and other heavy staples,” Newmark eventually became a major wholesale grocer, putting Beaudry, a competitor, out of business in the process. His book mentions his associations and business dealings with several early pioneers whose last names read like a gazetteer of Southern California: Phineas Banning, William Mulholland, Isaac Lankershim, Isaac Van Nuys and Pio Pico.

“He was known as an honest person and evenhanded guy. He became very wealthy,” Wilson said. However, “he was not what you would call a leader,” she added.

Yet, in moments of careful calculation, Harris Newmark led the way. He was a major investor in a real estate deal that led to the founding of the city of Montebello, so much so that at first, the area was called “Newmark.” In 1875, he sold 8,500 acres of Rancho Santa Anita (while he owned the property, he had a cattle brand made with his initials), which he bought for $85,000, to Lucky Baldwin for $200,000.

In 1877, Newmark purchased a parcel of land called the Temple Block, which in 1909 he sold to the city of Los Angeles so it could be used for the “nucleus of a city center,” he wrote. Today, that’s where L.A.’s City Hall stands.

He could also act on a whim. In 1869, while walking down Spring Street, Newmark saw a crowd. It was a property auction, and he heard a bid of “seven dollars.” Once, twice and “in the spirit of fun,” since he “did not even know what was being offered,” he raised his hand and bid “Seven dollars fifty cents.” “Sold to Harris Newmark,” said the auctioneer, who was actually the mayor. For “fun,” it turns out, he had bought 20 acres of what eventually would become the Wilshire District.

In 1887, Newmark was president of Congregation B’nai B’rith (it later became Wilshire Boulevard Temple), which Joseph Newmark, a lay rabbi and Harris Newmark’s uncle and father-in-law, organized in 1862.

In a Newmark family history and genealogy published in 1992, “The Harris Newmark Family: 1913-1993,” Fannie Emily Nordlinger Abrams, a great-granddaughter born in 1908, recalls that, “Harris always wore a yarmulke [though many photos show him without one], and I didn’t know what it was at the time. I thought it was just a little black hat and that he was the only one who wore one!”

He was also interested in advances in technology, taking note of the telegraph, stereopticon and velocipede (an early form of a bicycle), and advances in transportation. In 1882, when the telephone was introduced in L.A., H. Newmark and Co., an early subscriber, is issued number 5. He also wanted the city to have a free public drinking fountain, so he built one 7 feet high, and even got the water company to donate the water.

An astute trader and always looking for a more efficient way of doing business, he was also, at times, unable to pass up a bargain. When there was a railroad rate war between Southern Pacific and Santa Fe, he bought several carloads of coal in Chicago and had them shipped for a dollar a ton to give to his, by then, adult children to use in their homes.

At his passing, Newmark was survived by five of the 11 children born to him and Sarah. Today, many of his descendants continue to live in his carefully chronicled Southern California. Barbara Gordon, a psychotherapist and great-great granddaughter of Harris and Sarah Newmark, lives in West L.A. She calls her forebears a “typical German-Jewish family, who had “a sort of heaviness to them,” though they “were very close as a family.” They also had a “very dry sense of humor,” she added.

Warren Scharff, a great-grandson of Harris and Sarah (descending from their son Marco), lives in Ventura County. He says though he only once or twice has been recognized as a descendant, on one occasion it came in handy. While on a date at the Charles Loomis House (Loomis and Newmark were close friends), he was able to impress his date by pointing with pride to a plaque in the house’s yard that had, among others, his great-grandfather’s name.

Linda Levi, an artist living in in West L.A and a great-great-granddaughter, has connected with Harris and Sarah by collecting family albums, photos and documents and then donating them to the Autry Museum. She has augmented one of the photos, an 1894 image of the Newmark family at Yosemite, reaching across the generations, creating her own anachronistic image by inserting herself into the picture.

During our recent visit to Home of Peace, the Newmark family, standing before the mausoleum, carefully swung open the heavy bronze doors, revealing two side-by-side columns of family vaults, including those of Harris and Sarah Newmark, and Sarah’s parents, Joseph and Rosa Newmark. After a few quiet minutes and the recitation in English of the traditional El Male Rachamim (God Full of Mercy), the Newmarks prepared to depart, observing that many other descendants of their family have been buried in the general vicinity. On the ride home, obviously moved by his encounter, Harris Newmark III began taking stock. “Most of those people I’ve read and heard about, and now you see them,” he said. “You’re hit with it all at once,” and it “makes you think about life.”

Three years before he died, ever the city booster, Harris Newmark, to conclude his book, made, for its time, a startling and often-quoted prediction. Citing as evidence for his conclusion the completion of the Panama Canal, and the goods it would bring to L.A. Harbor, he wrote: “I believe that Los Angeles is destined to become, in not many years, a world-center, prominent in almost every field of human endeavor.”

Driving home on the freeway packed with trucks and cars; past another freeway that led to one of the country’s busiest ports; past an exit to USC, one of the nation’s great universities, whose footprint dwarfs the campus of Newmark’s time; and passing a cityscape punctuated by construction cranes, rising skyscrapers and new light-rail lines, with Los Angeles City Hall in the distance, Newmark’s vision could not have seemed more alive today. 

Harris Newmark: The Jewish father of L.A. Read More »

WATCH: Jewish representative among House Democrats staging anti-gun sit-in

A group of Democratic lawmakers sat down on the floor of the House of Representatives chamber to protest a lack of action on gun violence, demanding to vote on gun safety.

Among them was Jewish Rep. Jan Schakowsky of Illinois, who took the podium June 22. A Chicago native, she pointed to rampant gun deaths in that city as evidence for a need to legislate.

“We can’t let these daily shootings phase into the background of America,” she said. “I know that my constituents feel frustrated and ignored when Congress responds to each of these tragedies with inaction.”

The sit-in follows a Democratic filibuster in the Senate last week, also calling for action on guns.

Spearheaded by Rep. John Lewis of Georgia, the lawmakers called for a bill to ban people on the federal government’s no-fly list from obtaining gun.

They threatened to stay on the House floor until such a vote took place, chanting, “No bill, no break!”

WATCH: Jewish representative among House Democrats staging anti-gun sit-in Read More »

Moving and shaking: JFLA Circle of Hope, artworxLA, UC-JIR benefit and more

The Jewish Free Loan Association’s (JFLA) Circle of Hope Tribute Dinner at the Luxe Sunset Boulevard Hotel on June 1 honored Ivan Wolkind, Aaron Bloom, Jessica Rosen and the Zimmer Family Foundation. 

Wolkind, the recipient of the Ben & Anne Werber Communal Service Award, is The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles’ chief operating and financial officer. Bloom, a trial lawyer who served three terms as JFLA’s president and currently chairs the organization’s strategic planning committee, received the Nathan Shapell Memorial Lifetime Commitment Award.

Rosen, who received a JFLA loan in 2014 enabling her to open the yoga business One Down Dog in Silver Lake, received the Salter Family Foundation Client Recognition Award. And accepting the award on behalf of the Zimmer Family Foundation, which received the Mitchell Family Foundation Philanthropy Award, were Jonathan Flier and his fiancée, Darlene Basch, Ninel Khayat and Charles Lieberman.

The event’s approximately 220 attendees included JFLA President Harold Tomin and JFLA CEO David Levy.

According to the JFLA website, JFLA, which distributes interest-free loans to community members in need, “grants more than 1,200 loans every year, with more than $12 million circulating throughout the community.” Its focus is on emergencies, education, developing small businesses, health care and lifecycle events.


Robyn Lewis, who served as executive director of Shalhevet High School for the past four years, has been hired as the new executive director of Beth Jacob Congregation. She will begin July 1.

Robyn Lewis Photo courtesy of Shalhevet High School 

“Robyn is excited about the opportunity of working for and with Beth Jacob and we believe she possesses the skill set, experience and personality that will enable Beth Jacob to grow and prosper,” Beth Jacob president Jess Dolgin and chairman of the board Jack Fenigstein co-wrote in a June 15 email to members.

Lewis succeeds Allen Ishakis, who is resigning as the Modern Orthodox congregation’s executive director after 10 years of service in the position. He announced his resignation in a June 8 letter addressed to Dolgin.

“Everyone is working closely to ensure a smooth transition and there is no finalized date as to when Allen will be leaving,” Dolgin said in an email to the Journal.


Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion’s (HUC-JIR) third annual benefit gala honored Marlene and Sandy Louchheim and their family — including children Terry, Mark, Thomas and Deborah — May 17 at the Skirball Cultural Center.

Sandy and Marlene Louchheim (front) with Rabbi Aaron Panken, president of HUC-JIR (back left), and Joshua Holo, dean of HUC-JIR. 

The HUC-JIR Los Angeles campus houses the Jerome H. Louchheim School for Judaic Studies, which was founded in 1972 by the namesake’s son, William. His son, Sandy, and Sandy’s wife, Marlene, have long been involved with HUC-JIR, with Marlene having previously served on the school’s national board of governors and on its Western region board of overseers.

A number of their children and grandchildren have connections to HUC-JIR, as well. Terry previously served on the HUC-JIR Western region board of overseers. Thomas, who was ordained at HUC-JIR, is rabbi of Congregation Or Chadash in Tucson, Ariz., while his wife, Marcia, a graduate of the HUC-JIR Rhea Hirsch School of Education, is the founding educator there.

Mark is president of Bobrick Washroom Equipment Inc. and chair of the United Way of Greater Los Angeles board of directors, and his son, Matthew, is a third-generation overseer of the Skirball campus.

The event drew 330 attendees, including HUC-JIR President Rabbi Aaron Panken; Temple Emanuel of Beverly Hills Senior Rabbi Laura Geller, a Western region board of overseers member; L.A. City Controller Ron Galperin and his husband, Temple Akiba’s Rabbi Zachary Shapiro, a member of the regional board of overseers; and Skirball Cultural Center President Uri Herscher.

Leo Baeck Temple Senior Rabbi Ken Chasen provided musical entertainment, with HUC-JIR rabbinical students Jeff Stombaugh and Bryan Zive accompanying him.

HUC-JIR trains rabbis and cantors for the Reform movement and also offers graduate programs for educators and nonprofit professionals. It has campuses in Cincinnati, New York, Jerusalem and Los Angeles.


Leo Baeck Temple (LBT) recently raised more than $100,000 “to support LBT’s programs and educational opportunities,” according to a statement from the synagogue. It also honored board of trustees member Brian Rose and congregant Vida Brucker during the Reform synagogue’s 11th annual “Heroes & Angels” gala. 

Vida Brucker. Photo courtesy of Leo Baeck Temple

“Brian and Vida embody the caring, socially conscious ideals upon which LBT was founded, and their contributions to our community and the City of Los Angeles and beyond are immeasurable,” a statement said.

More than 300 people turned out for the May 14 event, which was Mediterranean-themed and held at the shul on Sepulveda Boulevard. 


Nonprofit arts organization artworxLA’s 24th annual gala, which was held May 5 at the Taglyan Cultural Complex, honored L.A. County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl; Hello Giggles CEO Sophia Rivka Rossi; and architect and artworxLA board member Grant Kirkpatrick.

From left: Architect and artworxLA board member Grant Kirkpatrick, Hello Giggles CEO Sophia Rivka Rossi, artworxLA founder and executive director Cynthia Campoy Brophy and L.A. County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl. Photo by Chris Devlin

The gala raised more than $260,000 to support artworxLA programs, according to the organization’s website. Attendees included Cynthia Campoy Brophy, founder and executive director of artworxLA.

Founded in 1992, artworxLA serves 650 students annually at 26 alternative high school sites. The organization, which aims to combat the epidemic of high school dropouts by engaging students with the arts, previously partnered with the Skirball Cultural Center on the exhibition “Visions and Values: Jewish Life from Antiquity to America.”

Moving and Shaking highlights events, honors and simchas. Got a tip? Email ryant@jewishjournal.com.

Moving and shaking: JFLA Circle of Hope, artworxLA, UC-JIR benefit and more Read More »

Jews should be wary of Trump’s rhetoric

Delete the word “Muslim” from Donald Trump’s rants. Substitute Jew, Latino, African-American, Asian American or any other ethnicity or religion that has felt the oppression of racist governments.

This would be a useful exercise for casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, who, The New York Times reported, is willing to donate $100 million to Trump’s presidential campaign. It would also be useful for other Jews considering backing the presumptive Republican presidential nominee.

Among the many reasons for them to reconsider their support is the way Trump scorns the idea of immigration, particularly that of Muslims. A voice of reason put it this way: “I cannot go there,” Heidi Wixom, a Nevada Mormon and GOP activist well respected in the community, told Politico of her thoughts on Trump. Pointing to the bigoted comments he has made about minority groups, she continued, “Belonging to a church that has felt persecution, you wonder, will his rhetoric continue on? What happens to a group of people he sees isn’t supportive of him? What would he do to them?”

With his constant attacks on Muslims, Trump also assaults a fundamental building block of United States democracy — freedom of religion. The U.S. was founded as a secular nation, as expressed in the First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof …” Granted, the amendment has been ignored, scorned and reinterpreted at times, but it remains at the heart of our democracy.

Trump’s attitude was clear in a speech he gave in New Hampshire earlier this month on the Orlando massacre.

He pledged again to suspend immigration from “areas … where there is a proven history of terrorism against the United States, Europe, or our allies … after a full, impartial and really long overdue security check, we will develop a responsible immigration policy that serves the interests and values of America. We cannot continue to allow thousands upon thousands of people to pour into our country, many of whom have the same thought processes as this savage killer. Many of the principles of radical Islam are incompatible with Western values and institutions.”

He tried to get around the constitutional guarantee of freedom of religion.  As Julia Preston wrote in The New York Times, “By proposing to bar people from certain regions rather than religions, Mr. Trump had avoided the sticky issue of testing someone’s faith.” But his meaning was clear from his many months of inflammatory depictions of Muslim immigrants.   

Trump’s speech was filled with his usual misstatements. Take, for example, his words on Syrian immigrants: “We have to stop the tremendous flow of Syrian refugees into the United States,” he said. “We don’t know who they are. They have no documentation.  And we don’t know what they’re planning.” 

The Guardian newspaper reported that since 2012, the U.S. has accepted 2,174 Syrian refugees — roughly 0.0007 percent of America’s total population. These are, the Guardian said, the most vulnerable survivors of the Syrian conflict, including women and their children, religious minorities and victims of violence or torture. President Barack Obama wants to take in 10,000 more.

These and other immigrants must undergo a background screening by the Department of Homeland Security, the State Department, the FBI and intelligence agencies, a process that takes between 18 and 24 months.

It is true that the United States, traditionally a nation of immigrants, still welcomes a lot of them. The Migration Policy Institute reported that in 2014, 1.3 million foreign-born individuals legally moved to the United States, an 11 percent increase over the 1.2 million who came here in 2013. India was the leading country of origin for new immigrants, with 147,500 arriving in 2014, followed by China (131,800), Mexico (130,000), Canada (41,200) and the Philippines (40,500).

But these statistics don’t support Trump’s picture of a wave of Muslim immigrants. India, the Migration Policy Institute notes, is 79.8 percent Hindu and 14.2 percent Muslim. Mexico’s Muslim population, estimated at about 110,000, is a small percentage of that country’s total population of 122.3 million. Only 3.2 percent of Canadians are Muslim, and only 5-12 percent of the population of the Philippines.

India has had major episodes of terrorism. Would Indian immigrants be investigated as to whether they were Hindu or Muslim? And what about Sikhs from India? Canada, the Philippines and Mexico have experienced terrorism. Would immigrants from these countries be investigated, inquiries that surely would include their religious backgrounds? 

To do so would require a massive expansion of federal law enforcement agencies. 

Yet some Jews, even though we’ve been singled out throughout our history for ethnic and religious persecution, support Trump.

JTA’s Uriel Heilman interviewed a number of Jewish Trump supporters and wrote in March, “There appear to be some inherent contradictions in the qualities many of Trump’s Jewish supporters say they like about him. They see his brash and sometimes crude persona as authentic but believe he’ll behave differently as president. They admire his business successes but disregard or explain away his business failures. They acknowledge his big ego but say Trump understands that being president is more about assembling the right team of advisers than about the man himself.”

That reflects one of the great misconceptions about Trump — that smart, sensible advisers would shape his administration. The other is that Congress, the courts and public opinion would prevent him from violating the Constitution.

His conduct during the campaign — a one-man band consulting only a few enablers — shows the fallacy of the sensible adviser theory.

And history shows that supporters are wrong when they say the courts, Congress and public opinion would rein him in.

In 1942, at the beginning of World War II, President Franklin D. Roosevelt, exercising his vast war power, issued an executive order requiring that 110,000 Americans of Japanese ancestry be confined in detention camps. Racism, particularly in California, plus fears of a Japanese invasion, were behind the order. Fred Korematsu, 23, refused to leave home and go into a camp. He was arrested, convicted and interned in a government camp in Utah. Supported by the American Civil Liberties Union, he fought the conviction, but the Supreme Court upheld it.  ‘

Speaking for a 6-3 majority, Justice Hugo Black agreed with the U.S. military view that some Japanese Americans were loyal to Japan and that it would be impossible to separate them from those faithful to the United States. The court ruled that national security outweighed the Constitution’s guarantee of equal rights.

In a powerful dissent that presciently seems to warn of the coming of Trump, Justice Robert Jackson wrote: “If the people ever let command of the war power fall into irresponsible and unscrupulous hands, the courts wield no power equal to its restraint. The chief restraint upon those who command the physical forces of the country, in the future as in the past, must be their responsibility to the political judgments of their contemporaries and to the moral judgments of history.”

In the months before the election, American Jews will inevitably discuss their feelings about Trump. The Jewish media will write about him more and more, as well it should.

During these discussions, we should remember the Korematsu decision is still on the books, available as a precedent for Trump. As Yale law professor Bruce Ackerman wrote in a 2004 essay, quoted in The New York Times: “What will we say after another terrorist attack? More precisely, what will the Supreme Court say if Arab Americans are herded into prison camps? Are we certain any longer that the wartime precedent of Korematsu will not be extended to the ‘war on terrorism?’ ”

If they do it to the Muslims, they can do it to any ethnic or religious group. It’s something that we Jews, of all people, should think about. 

BILL BOYARSKY is a columnist for the Jewish Journal, Truthdig and L.A. Observed, and the author of “Inventing L.A.: The Chandlers and Their Times” (Angel City Press).

Jews should be wary of Trump’s rhetoric Read More »

What I Love and Hate About Donors Choose

This week I received in the mail an unexpected surprise: an envelope full of hand-made thank-you notes from local fifth grade students. A while ago I made a donation through “>Chabot Space and Science Center for her students. As I read through the notes, I was surprised by the emotional response I had to them.

The friend who made this request works for a school which teaches a lot of at-risk kids. Many of them come from low income families, and many of them are either undocumented, or have parents or other family members who are undocumented. They live precarious lives, struggling to get by, often trying to learn without much help from their parents, who may be out in the evening working at their second or third job, or who are struggling, themselves, to learn English.

Does this mean the school they attend, “>Religious and Reform Facebook page to see additional photos, and What I Love and Hate About Donors Choose Read More »

The Rage for Order exchange, part 2: ‘America should still do more in the Middle East’

Robert F. Worth spent fourteen years as a correspondent for The New York Times, and was the paper’s Beirut bureau chief from 2007 until 2011. He is a frequent contributor to The New York Times Magazine and The New York Review of Books. He has twice been a finalist for the National Magazine Award. Born and raised in Manhattan, he now lives in Washington D.C.

The following exchange focuses on his critically acclaimed book A Rage for Order (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2016). Part 1 can be found right here.

***

Dear Mr. Worth,

In the previous round we discussed the role of Arab dictators in the current disorder, and you stated that strong autocrats are not the solution to the Middle East's state of chaos. As you wrote:

To feed and preserve these systems is the worst possible thing the West can do. I do not mean to suggest that the West should topple autocrats like Assad; again, more chaos would only make things worse. But it’s important to recognize that his regime, and others like it, do not represent a solution. The first step towards a healthier future in the Arab region – which will take a long, long time – is to acknowledge this.  

Now, in your book you mention your decision not to focus on the United States' role in the uprisings, which you deem as “secondary.” The forces at play, as you describe them, are primarily indigenous, and this makes the tragic personal stories you tell seem frustratingly inevitable.

My question:

Does this mean that America and the West can do nothing better than remain on the side-lines? Are there any active measures that a White House executive who reads your book could be justifiably prompted to take?

Yours,

Shmuel

***

Dear Shmuel,

I think the United States can and should play a somewhat more active role in the Middle East than it has over the past five years, by being more diplomatically engaged. But it should not expect immediate or large-scale results.

The Arab uprisings took Washington by surprise, and the subsequent descent into chaos would not have been much altered by a different American policy. In the coming years, any victories in peacemaking or political development are likely to be small and local, but that does not mean they are not worth the cost. The most important need, I think, is more aggressive and imaginative diplomacy. The United States has retreated too far on the diplomatic front, and that is a shame.

This trend started before the tragic death of Christopher Stevens, the US ambassador in Libya, in 2012. It has accelerated since then, with the White House unwilling to risk the political price of another such incident. In too many places, diplomats rarely venture from their fortress-like embassies. This kind of retrenchment robs us of our best resource in a time of chaos and civil war. Look at Yemen, where a US-brokered transition in 2011-2012 broke down, because there were no brokers who had credibility in Yemen’s various political camps.

We need more diplomats who speak the languages and have logged time in these countries, got to know the local players, and are empowered to make deals. There is no guarantee that this kind of expeditionary diplomacy can prevent or attenuate conflict, but it’s usually the best possible shot, especially if it’s matched with flexible, deft military tools. In Syria, for instance, I think the US could probably do more to save lives and pressure the Assad government. I doubt that such measures would end the war or change the current disposition of forces in the near term. Syria is a true problem from hell: a multi-sided, insidiously complex civil war, with numerous foreign powers playing proxy roles. But saving lives is always worth doing, and the longer it takes to reach a settlement in Syria, the more refugees will stream to Europe, damaging the EU and empowering Russia.  

The Rage for Order exchange, part 2: ‘America should still do more in the Middle East’ Read More »

A Semi-Automatic Rifle is Not an Assault Weapon — Except When It Essentially Is

With the recent mass shooting in Orland, Florida, an age-old debate between the pro-gunners and anti-gunners has shown up again.

The pro-gunners are quick to point out that rifles, like the “>Bump Fire. Though an AR-15, outfitted with a Bump Fire stock fires hundreds of rounds per minute, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms found the device doesn’t turn a semi-automatic rifle into a machine gun. The Bump Fire stocks remain just this side of legal.

Bump Fire owners on YouTube often smile and giggle like little girls when they start blasting as if to say, “I can't believe we are getting away with this.”

Bump Fire for the Home

Several years ago, Slide Fire presented a stock that permits the user to simulate full auto fire — easily. Just after that, another manufacturer produced a copy, at a lower cost, and was sued. A similar version can be made and home and there are a variety of how-to-guides online that show the how-to.

But, do the add-ons really have a place in home defense?

As sure as the sun comes up, someone will try to make the argument that using something scary, or different, will put you in jail, but that is not how use of force laws work.

If you act in a safe manner and use deadly force only when it is determined to be truly necessary, you are not likely to go to trial. Nonetheless, using a device like a bump fire stock will present you with some problems.

“As controllable as it is, you are more apt to miss with a round or two from a burst,” said “>need to accessorize their rifles to completely communicate their virile self-image.


Gimmicky Toy

Even some gun specialists challenge the efficiency of bump firing. In his analysis of the stock for The Truth About Guns, Leghorn said the “entire idea is a gimmicky toy.”

“There’s zip you can use if for,” says Leghorn. “It isn’t adequately stable  to use in self-defense, and it is not going to give any benefit while hunting.”

Likewise, Leghorn couldn’t find a practical use for bump fire stocks other than the fun of burning through as many rounds as possible without having to go through the bother of getting a true automatic weapon.

Bump firing is a costly distraction. Online ammo shop, Lucky Gunner, invoices $240 for 1000 rounds of its cheapest .223 bullets, the most popular round for AR-15s.

Shooters employing bump fire stocks can shoot between 500 and 800 rounds a minute. They can easily throw away $500 worth of ammo in under five minutes.


The Slide Fire Solutions bump fire stock is almost a twin of the Bump Fire. The shooter in this video, around the 20-second mark, the shooter stops, look at the camera and says, “The Slide Fire Solutions bump fire stock essentially gives you full automatic capability.”

A Semi-Automatic Rifle is Not an Assault Weapon — Except When It Essentially Is Read More »

Israel’s Chief Rabbinate agrees to mikvah immersion without attendant

The use of an attendant during mikvah immersion in Israel will be changed from mandatory to optional.

Israel’s Chief Rabbinate and Ministry of Religious Services agreed on the change in a filing Wednesday with the Supreme Court. The state religious bodies were responding to a suit filed by ITIM, a group that supports Israelis in their encounters with the country’s religious bureaucracy.

“Female mikvah bathers can decide for themselves whether to follow this halachic rule (immersing in the presence of the female mikvah attendant), including bathing by themselves or with the company of a friend, while the local religious council and its employees will not condition the bathing with the presence of the female mikvah attendant during the ritual bathing,” read the response delivered to the court by the state attorney’s office, according to ITIM.

Religious authorities believe the supervision of an attendant at a mikvah, or ritual bath, is necessary to ensure that the woman’s immersion is done according to halachah, or Orthodox Jewish law, including ensuring that every part of the woman, including all her hair, is under the water at the same time.

Some women have complained of mistreatment by mikvah attendants or a screening that is too rigorous. Victims of sexual abuse also have asked to not be observed during immersion.

The response clarifies that the religious position of the Chief Rabbinate is that immersion in the mikvah must be done in the presence of a female mikvah attendant and that signs to that effect should hang in all mikvahs.

Last July, ITIM filed the petition on behalf of 13 women calling on the Supreme Court to instruct the Ministry of Religious Affairs to require all religious councils to maintain “a procedure aimed to protect the personal privacy of all mikvah bathers,” as well as to instruct all religious councils to enable bathing without the presence of the female mikvah attendant in cases where the women demand it.

Rabbi Seth Farber, director of  ITIM, in a statement congratulated the Chief Rabbinate “on showing compliance and an understating to the needs of the many women who wish to bathe in the mikvahs, thus bringing them, and many other women, closer to this important mitzvah.”

The Tzohar rabbinical organization called the decision “a further important step forward in promoting Jewish practice and halacha in Israel in an atmosphere of love and acceptance rather than coercion.”

Israel’s Chief Rabbinate agrees to mikvah immersion without attendant Read More »