fbpx

November 12, 2015

Illinois university settles with professor who criticized Israel

The University of Illinois said on Thursday that it would pay $875,000 to settle a lawsuit by a professor who lost out on a tenured position after he made Twitter postings critical of Israel.

Steven Salaita, 40, had sued the university for violation of his rights to free speech, saying that donors had pressured trustees to withdraw their offer due to public criticisms he made about Israeli military strikes in Gaza.

The settlement includes $275,000 for Salaita's attorneys. Salaita will not be hired by the university, which does not admit to any wrongdoing, according to a university statement. The settlement will be covered by the university's self-insurance and institutional funds.

“Although the amount is significant, it is less than what we would spend if the case were to continue and proceed to trial over the next year,” said Interim Chancellor Barbara Wilson, in the statement.

The flagship state school, based in Urbana-Champaign in central Illinois, has already spent $1.3 million litigating the case, said spokesman Tom Hardy.

Salaita left a tenured position at Virginia Tech to take the job in Illinois and the withdrawal of the offer harmed his reputation and caused him economic hardship, according to his federal lawsuit, filed in January.

The suit sought both money and reinstatement to his position as an indigenous studies professor in the American Indian Studies program.

The university said examples of messages posted by Salaita included, “Zionist uplift in America: every little Jewish boy and girl can grow up to be the leader of a monstrous colonial regime.”

Salaita, who is married with a young son, said in his complaint that he is not anti-Semitic but “felt an obligation to speak out” after news reports of military action in Gaza. 

The messages Salaita posted showed he “lacks the judgment, temperament and thoughtfulness to serve as a member of our faculty in any capacity” the university said in response to Salaita's suit.

Salaita currently has a one-year post at the American University of Beirut in Lebanon.

Illinois university settles with professor who criticized Israel Read More »

Holiday preview calendar 2015

FRI | NOV 13

“KARSKI & THE LORDS OF HUMANITY”

Combining archival footage with animated sequences, the film uses a groundbreaking technique to tell the story of Jan Karski, a hero of the Polish Underground State. He was the first person to reveal to the Western Allied governments the atrocities and mass murders committed by the Nazis in occupied Poland. Karski was sent undercover to the Warsaw Ghetto to investigate the situation of the Jews; he sought to reveal the tragedy of the Jewish people to the world. Animation by Slawomir Grünberg, documentary filmmaker and Emmy winner. Times vary. $8-$12. Through Nov. 19. Laemmle’s Playhouse 7, 673 E. Colorado Blvd., Pasadena. (310) 478-3836. SAT | NOV 14

NEIL GAIMAN

” target=”_blank”>carpenterarts.org.

SUN | NOV 15

“PAST & PRESENT: RUSSIAN JEWISH AMERICAN STORIES”

Los Angeles has a huge community of Russian Jews, and this show incorporates anecdotes, songs, poetry and even stand-up comedy to relate their experiences. You will hear stories of leaving one land for another, settling in a new country, finding love, raising children, facing hardship and learning what it means to be a Jew out from under communism. Moving, humorous and eye-opening, it gives the audience an inside look at our Russian-Jewish neighbors and the life they lived in the former Soviet Union and are living today in America. The show is a collaboration among Jewish Women’s Theatre, The Braid and RuJuLA in partnership with The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles, Genesis Philanthropy Group and The Jewish Agency of Israel. 2 p.m. $35. National Council of Jewish Women, 543 N. Fairfax Ave., Los Angeles. (310) 315-1400. Also playing 7:30 p.m. Nov. 16 at The Braid, 2912 Colorado Ave., #102, Santa Monica. (323) 651-2930. SAT | NOV 21

FRAN LEBOWITZ

” target=”_blank”>carpenterarts.org.

SUN | NOV 22

SEPHARDIC MUSIC FESTIVAL

LASHA, a nonprofit that supports Los Angeles’ elderly, is offering an afternoon of multicultural foods, music and a traditional Middle Eastern bazaar. Headliners include Los Pasharos Sefardis, the world-famous Ladino singing ensemble from Istanbul and the most recent generations of Turkish Sephardim to speak Judeo-Spanish; Victoria and Ensemble, a Persian pop singer who emulates the sounds of Googoosh, the Iranian singer and actress; Claude Afota and Band, invoking Hebrew, French and Moroccan musical heritage, mixing North Africa’s French, Spanish flamenco and traditional Middle Eastern drumming. 1 p.m. $25. Sephardic Temple Tifereth Israel, 10500 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles. (818) 348-3331. TUE | DEC 1

MAINSTAGE

Calling all 20- and 30-somethings: Join The Jewish Federation’s Young Adults of Los Angeles for a night celebrating revolutionaries in their industries. There will be great food, drinks, entertainment, music and friends to ensure an evening you won’t forget. Comedian Ben Gleib, host of the game show “Idiotest,” will host and emcee the event. Others in attendance will include Sean Rad, Tinder CEO and founder; Susanne Daniels, YouTube head of original content; Ben Silverman, executive producer of “The Office”; Ben Winston, executive producer of the “The Late Late Show With James Corden”; John Altschuler and Dave Krinsky, co-creators of “Silicon Valley”; and many more. As a nod to #GivingTuesday, $50 of each ticket will go to support The Federation. 7 p.m. $75. The Fonda Theatre, 6126 Hollywood Blvd., Los Angeles. (323) 761-8000. THUR | DEC 3

“ABOVE AND BEYOND”

This film tells the story of a group of Jewish-American pilots who, in answering a call for help, smuggled planes out of the U.S. and flew for Israel in its War of Independence. This was in 1948, just three years after the liberation of Nazi death camps. It was a risky move but they changed the tide of the war, and also embarked on personal journeys of discovering and renewing their Jewish pride. “Above and Beyond” is the first major feature-length documentary about the foreign airmen in the 1948 war. Produced by Nancy Spielberg, the film brings together new interviews and stunning aerial footage to present a tale full of heart and heroism. 6 p.m. Free. RSVP requested. UCLA Humanities Building, Room A51, 415 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles. (310) 267-5327. TUES | DEC 8

“EAST JERUSALEM, WEST JERUSALEM”

” target=”_blank”>skirball.org.

SAT | DEC 19

JEFF GOLDBLUM AND THE MILDRED SNITZER ORCHESTRA

” target=”_blank”>thewallis.org.

THUR | DEC 24

L.A. COUNTY HOLIDAY CELEBRATION: SEASONAL MUSIC AND DANCE SPECTACULAR

” target=”_blank”>lacountyarts.org.

MATZOBALL

Ignore all that Yuletide sentiment — one of the biggest Jewish singles events in the nation is getting bigger than ever! Kicking off its 29th year, MatzoBall sets the stage for the ultimate party experience. Don’t miss out on what USA Today called “The Number 1 Holiday Party of the Year.” 9 p.m. $30. 21 and older. The Room Hollywood, 1626 N. Cahuenga Blvd., Los Angeles. (212) 389-9922. Holiday preview calendar 2015 Read More »

No unity in labeling the Muslim Brotherhood ‘terrorist’

This post originally appeared on themedialine.org.

In the halls of power of both the United States and the United Kingdom, renewed discussions have been taking place over the status of the organization known as the Muslim Brotherhood. In Washington, Senator Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), a candidate for the Republican nomination for president, has offered legislation that would ban the group; while in London, following a visit by Egyptian President Abdel Fatteh Al-Sissi, Prime Minister David Cameron announced that a government review into the group would be published.

Despite these efforts and a considerable amount of popular agreement, neither of the governments lists the Muslim Brotherhood on its respective roll of foreign terrorist organizations and many analysts who are adamant in their assessment that the Brotherhood fails to meets the criteria for a terrorist organization argue political expediency is the cause for the governments’ positions.

The Muslim Brotherhood is a Sunni Islamic organization formed in 1928 in Egypt. The group combines politics, religious observance and charitable welfare work and seeks to bring about a Muslim “caliphate,” a state ruled by its strict interpretation of sharia [Islamic law]. In the group’s origins, traces of terrorist ideology can be found, Shehab Wagih, spokesperson for the Free Egyptians Party, told The Media Line. “Sayyid Qutb was one of their main ideologues. His aim was to achieve an Islamic state and an Islamic change would require violence,” Wagih said.

Qutb was an Egyptian intellectual executed by the government in 1966 for alleged links to a plot to assassinate then President Gamal Abdel Nasser. His writings focused on the political and social role of Islam in the modern world and were also highly critical of American culture which he viewed as hedonistic and corrosive.

For much of its history, during the years of secularist dictators in Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood was banned in its home country. This changed briefly following the so-called “Arab Spring” in 2011, after the overthrow of long-time President Hosni Mubarak and the subsequent election of the Muslim Brotherhood’s own leader, Mohammed Morsi. The first and only democratically elected head of state, Morsi’s selection was a watershed moment for the organization which had for years lurked in the shadows of Egyptian politics, but never rose to power. Within a year of Morsi taking office widespread protests against his policies – which were seen as overtly Islamist and abusive to human rights — brought the country to a standstill. Subsequently, the army stepped in and placed its head, Gen. Al-Sissi, in power. He subsequently became the next elected president.

With Sissi at the helm, a harsh crackdown against the Brotherhood ensued, in which hundreds of Egyptians were killed, thousands arrested and many sentenced to death in mass-trials. Yet, the Brotherhood did not resort to calls for violence, Haytham Mouzahem, head of the Beirut Center for Middle East Studies, told The Media Line. The Muslim Brotherhood has always maintained its practice of abiding by the “democratic process and the civil peaceful means as the means for changing the regime or the laws or the policies of the state,” Mouzahem said.

Although a number of violent individuals — Al-Qaeda leader Ayman Zawahiri, for instance — have emerged through the ranks of the Muslim Brotherhood, acts of terrorism attributed to them were always committed after their time with the group ended, Mouzahem argued.

This is no absolution for Shehab Wagih, who argues that it is the Muslim Brotherhood’s ideology which brings about the violent actions. “Many incidents were performed by Muslim Brotherhood members but the official organization does not admit this,” Wagih insisted.

Analysts have pointed to the Brotherhood affiliate in Tunisia, Ennahda, which lost an election in 2014 and relinquished power peacefully, as evidence of the movement’s commitment to peaceful politics. “In the last decade, the Muslim Brotherhood has developed its discourse and accepted the democratic process and results and said it aims to establish a civil state, not an Islamic state,” Mouzahem said in defense of the group.

But connections to foreign Islamist groups are often presented as evidence of the Muslim Brotherhood’s ties to terrorism. The Palestinian organization Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip, was founded as a branch of the Brotherhood and is branded by both Israel and the US as a terrorist organization. Yet, the Brotherhood also has connections to democratic parties in Tunisia, Jordan and Turkey.

“Any definition of terrorism requires the use of violence or the threat of the use of violence in pursuit of political aims,” Andrea Teti, of the department of Politics & International Relations at the University of Aberdeen, told The Media Line. “There is no evidence that the Brotherhood has called for or used violence for political ends,” Teti explained, adding that for this reason he believed the group should not be designated a terrorist organization.

Notwithstanding such arguments, the debate over how the Muslim Brotherhood should be viewed continues in both the US and UK. British Prime Minister Cameron signaled that although his government would not ban the Brotherhood, it would increase scrutiny of its actions, a policy viewed by many as a gesture of cooperation to those Middle East nations – including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Syria and Egypt — that have banned the Brotherhood or list it as a terrorist organization.

Such designations are fluid and can change to suit a country’s interests, Jasmine Gani, of the School of International Relations at St. Andrews University, told The Media Line. “The term ‘terrorist’ has become a political tool, conferred on groups that are deemed to go against a country’s interests; and at the same time it can be lifted at any time if the interests or political conditions change,” Gani explained.

“It somewhat undermines the utility of the term ‘terrorist,’” she concluded.

No unity in labeling the Muslim Brotherhood ‘terrorist’ Read More »

Rouhani says U.S.-Iran ties could be restored but U.S. must apologize

The nuclear deal reached between world powers and Iran could lead to better relations between Tehran and Washington if the United States apologized for past behavior, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani was quoted as saying on Thursday.

The pragmatist president, who championed the July 14 deal, has pushed for closer engagement with the West since his 2013 landslide election win.

But Iran's top authority, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has continued to rule out normalizing ties with the “Great Satan,” as he routinely calls the United States.

In an interview with Italy's Corriere della Sera newspaper, Rouhani suggested that the United States and Iran could open embassies in each other's capitals after decades of mutual hostility, but said Washington should apologize, without going into further detail.

“One day these embassies will re-open but what counts is behavior and the Americans hold the key to this,” Rouhani told the newspaper ahead of a trip to Italy this weekend, his first to a European capital.

“If they modify their policies, correct errors committed in these 37 years and apologize to theIranian people, the situation will change and good things can happen.”

Iran and Washington severed ties shortly after the 1979 Islamic revolution when radical students seized the U.S. embassy in Tehran and held 52 Americans hostage for over a year.

Relations came under further pressure in the last decade over Iran's nuclear ambitions. 

Under the nuclear deal reached in July, Iran will curb its nuclear program in exchange for an easing of sanctions on its economy. Tehran denied Western suspicions it wanted to develop an atomic bomb.

Khamenei, who has the final say on all state matters, gave his conditional approval to the deal with six world powers including the United States, but has warned against allowing any U.S. political or economic influence on Iran.

Rouhani said Washington would have to fulfill its part in the nuclear accord for relations to improve. The United States approved conditional sanctions waivers for Iran, though these will not take effect until Tehran has complied with the nuclear accord.

“The way this agreement is applied can have an impact on the future,” Rouhani said in the interview.

“If it is well applied it can lay the foundation for fewer tensions with the United States, creating the conditions to open a new era. But if the Americans don't respect their part of the nuclear accord, then surely our relationship will remain as it has been in the past,” he said.

Rouhani is due to see the Italian prime minister and business leaders during his Nov. 14-15 visit to Rome and will also hold talks with Pope Francis.

He will then fly to Paris for talks on Nov. 16-17.

Rouhani says U.S.-Iran ties could be restored but U.S. must apologize Read More »

Holiday films celebrate women

Although few explicitly Jewish-oriented films will be opening during this holiday season, there are several movies worthy of attention. Many of these focus on various forms of female empowerment or movement toward independent action by women.

One film featuring a Jewish subject is “Peggy Guggenheim: Art Addict,” Lisa Immordino Vreeland’s documentary about the heiress from the socially prominent Guggenheim family who became a celebrated art collector, exhibitor and promoter of artists.  

Roloff Beny, Peggy Guggenheim seen through a sculpture Photo courtesy of National Archives of Canada and Peggy Guggenheim Collection Archives, Venice 

“I am mostly enraptured by the idea of characters who like to reinvent or transform themselves,” Vreeland said in an interview. “They decide at a young age that they want to become something different, something that perhaps they were never destined to become.  As an art history major, I was always interested in Peggy. I’d read her autobiography, ‘Out of This Century.’ I fell in love with her story, her modern approach to life, her courage and audacity and, most importantly, her love of the arts.” 

A daughter of German Jews, Guggenheim is described in the film as feeling “outside” the traditional life of her wealthy New York family, hence her interest in modern writers and artists, including the Dadaists and the Surrealists, practitioners of what was then “outside art,” and with whom she mingled in Paris during the 1920s.

 In 1938, she opened a gallery in London called “Guggenheim Jeune,” where she exhibited the works of such artists as Pablo Picasso, Wassily Kandinsky, Henry Moore, Max Ernst and Georges Braque. When World War II erupted, she bought innumerable paintings by some of those artists, as well as other icons, among them Joan Miró, Marc Chagall, Salvador Dali and René Magritte.

After fleeing Europe for New York during World War II, she opened The Art of This Century Gallery and was instrumental in promoting still more artists, including Jackson Pollock and Ernst, the latter of whom she married.

Ultimately, Guggenheim established a museum for her world-famous collection at her palazzo in Venice, Italy, where she lived until her death in 1979.

Vreeland, who garnered attention for her previous film, “Diana Vreeland: The Eye Has to Travel,” about her husband’s grandmother, anchors her current film around audio recordings made of interviews with Guggenheim for an authorized biography by Jacqueline Bograd Weld, who believed the tapes were lost. Vreeland was given access to Weld’s original research and discovered the tapes in the basement of Weld’s home.

The interviews serve as voice-overs for the film, which is replete with archival footage and images of paintings from Guggenheim’s collection, as well as interviews with art historians and curators. The movie also covers Guggenheim’s sexual adventures and the tragedies in her life, including her father’s death in the sinking of the Titanic.

Vreeland said one thread running through the film captures a kind of passion.

“I am very old-fashioned and still feel that passion is an important aspect in life. Peggy Guggenheim did not have the type of character that makes you immediately feel like she had that quality, but I profoundly feel like she did. The practice of art is a very human endeavor, and she identified with it and truly found herself. Her love of the arts and the artists would become her drive and ultimately her legacy to the world.”

“Peggy Guggenheim: Art Addict” opens Nov. 13.


An extraordinary, pioneering female journalist is the focus of the biographical feature film “10 Days in a Madhouse,” about the young reporter Elizabeth Cochrane, who took the pen name Nellie Bly. The movie, based on Bly’s book of the same name, deals with her infiltration into an insane asylum for women and her subsequent exposé describing the deplorable conditions and abuses she experienced there.

Russian-born actress Alexandra Callas plays the historical figure Nurse Grupe in “10 Days in a Madhouse.”

Bly was only 23 when Joseph Pulitzer (who was Jewish), owner of the New York World, hired her for the risky assignment of going undercover in a mental institution. The film depicts Bly (Caroline Barry) moving into a boardinghouse for working women, where she practices feigning insanity. She gets herself committed to Blackwell’s Asylum, and, once there, drops her insane demeanor and acts normally, but, just as other normal inmates cannot do, she fails to convince the doctors and nurses that she isn’t sick. While a “patient” there, she witnesses other patients being unnecessarily drugged, beaten, fed inedible food, made to endure ice-cold baths and denied other basic human needs and rights. She herself suffers some of that abuse, under which many of the inmates die. Their bodies are then sent to a crematorium. 

After 10 days, which seem an eternity to her, Pulitzer arranges for her release. When her articles revealing the inhuman conditions at the institution are published, several investigations are launched, including an inquiry by a grand jury, and meaningful reforms are introduced.

In the production notes, screenwriter/director Timothy Hines is quoted as saying, “My mother died in 2008 at the age of 91. She had 10 of us and could tell many stories of oppression against women throughout her life that began in 1917. My mother was a hero of mine. A hero of hers growing up was Nellie Bly. Eventually Nellie Bly was a hero of mine as well — a woman who changed the world again and again.

“She was the mother of investigative journalism and the inventor of the 55-gallon drum,” Hines continues. “She championed orphans and those with no voice and was the first woman to report from the front lines in WWI. In ‘10 Days in a Madhouse,’ she showed unbridled courage standing up to horrible abusers and facing death to tell the truth of what went on behind locked doors for poor women who could not afford, nor were offered, representation.

“As a man and a supporter of women’s rights, I believe her story needs to be told.”

 “10 Days in a Madhouse” opens Nov. 20.


Another tale of female courage, this one mostly fictional, is found in “Mustang,” a Turkish movie that marks the filmmaking debut of Deniz Gamze Ergüven, who was born in Ankara, Turkey, but has lived in the United States and studied film at La Fémis in France. Ergüven also co-wrote the script with Alice Winocour.

Five sisters fight oppressive social norms in “Mustang.”

“Mustang” is set in a northern Turkish village, where five orphaned sisters are being raised by their grandmother and uncle. At the end of the school year, the girls say goodbye to one of their teachers, who is leaving the town, then they frolic on the beach and in the water with some of their male classmates. As the young people splash one another, the girls play a game on the shoulders of the boys. It is all quite innocent, but a neighbor sees them and tells the girls’ grandmother that they were behaving lewdly. In their culture, female chastity and modesty are mandatory.

Consequently, the sisters are forbidden to attend school anymore and are virtually imprisoned in the house. Bars are put on the windows, and the exits and entrances to the home are placed under lock and key. The house is transformed into a school for future wives, and women come to teach the girls how to cook and to fulfill other domestic duties. The goal is to arrange marriages for the girls as quickly as possible, and the two eldest soon become brides. 

The story becomes darker as the action proceeds, and the suppression of females in their milieu becomes increasingly stark.

However, the two youngest girls take back their power in a monumental act of rebellion.

According to Ergüven, the film grew out of her deep desire to tell what it means to be a girl in Turkey today. 

“I had an acute feeling of a strong, almost permanent sexualization of women here, which starts at an early age,” Ergüven said in an interview. “And it happens to the young characters of the film, who are accused of having rubbed themselves against the back of some boys’ necks, after playing an innocent game where they sit on some boys’ shoulders. That specific situation is autobiographical. What I have in common with the narrator and main character of the film is to be the youngest in a family nebula of girls and women.”

Ergüven said her movie has engendered great emotional response in Turkey. “The reactions to the film are as polarized as the country is today. People who love the film are completely passionate about it, those who don’t range between aggressive and murderous. With this film, we’re in pioneer territory. 

“I am proud of my characters and proud of my actresses,” she added. “They are figures of strength, courage and absolute resilience. And it is such a joy to know that the voices of these girls are heard and touch people far away from our home.” 

“Mustang” opens Nov. 20.


The season’s offerings include two films about female sexual empowerment. One of these is “Carol,” which depicts a forbidden love affair between two women in New York in the 1950s, with Cate Blanchett in the title role. The film is based on the book “The Price of Salt” by Patricia Highsmith, and was adapted for the screen by Phyllis Nagy.

In the film, Therese Belivet (Rooney Mara), a young New York department store clerk, finds herself drawn from afar to an elegant, attractive, obviously affluent customer, who turns out to be Carol Aird, a woman caught in a loveless marriage to a wealthy man.  After a series of meetings that seem casual at first, but are heavy with a tension that permeates the air, the two women take a car trip west during the Christmas holidays and begin a passionate liaison. It is a relationship that, in that era, was considered depraved. 

Carol has had a similar affair in the past with a friend from childhood, and her current situation is complicated by her impending divorce from a husband who still loves her and who decides to sue for sole custody of their young daughter.

According to Mara, who spoke at a Q-and-A after a screening of the film, the relationship is a coming-of-age experience for Therese. Mara’s character begins to pursue a career as a photographer, and she has a boyfriend when we first meet her.  

The film re-creates the look, feel and attitudes of the time and place. At one point, attempting to reconcile with her husband for the sake of their child, Carol sees a therapist, reflecting the belief back then that homosexuality was a psychological problem.

Ultimately, she and Therese decide to make a bold choice.

“As these two women become infatuated and entranced by each other, they begin to confront the conflicts their attraction provokes,” director Todd Haynes says in the press notes.

Blanchett’s thoughts on her character are also quoted in the notes: “Carol is someone who perhaps appears very remote and self-contained and self-possessed, but in a way I think she’s crumbling. She doesn’t fit — neither Carol nor Therese fits — neatly into a social circle or in that time, an underground movement. So, I think they’re both ambushed by the intensity of the connection they share with each other.” 

“Carol” opens Nov. 20.


Another bold form of sexual freedom is portrayed in “The Danish Girl,” a docudrama about one of the first transgender individuals to undergo a sex-change (male to female) operation.  

Eddie Redmayne in “The Danish Girl.”

As the action begins, it is 1926 in Copenhagen. Artists Einar (Eddie Redmayne) and Gerda (Alicia Vikander) Wegener are a couple who seemingly enjoy a healthy sex life.  At the time, he is a landscape painter, while she is a portraitist. 

One day, a model cannot make a sitting, and Gerda asks her husband to fill in by putting on a pair of women’s shoes and stockings so that she can complete the work. She also drapes him with a dress. 

The attire awakens something deep within Einar, and he starts wearing women’s clothing with increasing frequency. He begins to say openly to Gerda that he has been caught in the wrong body, because he really is a woman, and he begins to identify as Lili Elbe. At first, the couple’s lovemaking continues, but that ceases when Lili emerges more fully and starts going out publicly as her true self.

Eventually, they leave Denmark for Paris, which they believe offers a more open-minded environment. Despite the strain on their marriage, Gerda supports Lili’s journey, which leads, ultimately, to two sexual reassignment surgeries. Although tragedy strikes, Lili is fulfilled in having emerged completely.

According to screenwriter Lucinda Coxon’s statement in the press notes, “Stories that are rooted in truth, like Lili’s is, are never only heroic or only tragic. We wanted to tell the full story, so we show what became of both Gerda and Lili. ‘The Danish Girl’ is absolutely a heroic story, but these are people ahead of their time, and that is reflected in what medical progress had or had not been made. Tragedy enters the story not because of anyone’s overreach.

“I realized that Lili’s remarkable story had been swept away by the tide of history. Hers was an incredibly important moment, and one I’d not heard about at all.” 

Director Tom Hooper is quoted as saying, “I fell in love with the script as soon as I read it, which was in 2008 when I was preparing ‘The King’s Speech.’ (Hooper won an Oscar for his direction of that film.) It was the best script I’ve ever read. I wept three times when I read it — and I’m not sentimental.  I’ve wanted to make the movie ever since.” 

“The Danish Girl” opens Nov. 27.


On a lighter note, two British princesses take a stab at liberation from their regal roles to celebrate VE Day, May 8, 1945, in the film “A Royal Night Out.” According to the press notes, 19-year-old Princess Elizabeth (Sarah Gadon) and her 14-year-old sister, Princess Margaret (Bel Powley), actually did celebrate at the Ritz that night, in the company of other aristocrats, and returned to Buckingham Palace soon after midnight. The movie is something of a fairy tale about what might have happened to them. In reality, events probably did not quite play out as presented in the film. “It’s a true story by which everybody is intrigued. But we don’t know exactly what happened. It’s a little fantasy inspired by that true story,” director Julian Jarrold says in the press notes.

Bel Powley in “A Royal Night Out.”

The movie begins with images of cheering crowds and footage of British Prime Minister Winston Churchill announcing the victory in Europe. Princess Elizabeth, the future queen, and Princess Margaret, called P2, entreat their parents, the king and queen of England, to let them go out among the people to celebrate. Although they lead privileged lives, the sisters are restricted by protocol and by their responsibilities, and they long for more freedom.  

At first, their parents are adamantly opposed to the idea, but Elizabeth finally persuades her father to relent, arguing that they can get an accurate idea of how his planned victory speech is received by the public at large. And so, the princesses are sent forth with two soldiers as chaperones and with a 1 a.m. curfew.

After managing to give their chaperones the slip, the sisters get separated, and Margaret, the livelier of the two, winds up with a naval lieutenant who introduces her to the wilder side of London life. In the meantime, Elizabeth tries frantically to locate Margaret and enlists the aid of a cockney serviceman who is staunchly anti-monarchy and who has gone AWOL.

After a series of comedic mishaps, the two princesses are reunited and can look back on one adventurous night.

Gadon, who is Canadian, is quoted in the notes as saying that the occasion celebrated in the film really hit her as they were shooting in Trafalgar Square, where the people had actually congregated at the time. “It was a real movie moment of, ‘Oh my God, I can’t believe I’m in Trafalgar Square shooting a film about VE night.’ It was really special for me, because my nana was in the Women’s Auxiliary Air Force and my grandfather sailed under the British Navy in World War II. They were both in Trafalgar Square, celebrating on VE night. It is a powerful moment personally and a powerful moment creatively in the character’s journey as well.”

“A Royal Night Out” opens Dec. 4.


Also of interest:

“Iraqi Odyssey” is directed and written by Samir (who goes by only one name), who was born in Baghdad but moved to Switzerland as a child. The documentary traces the modern history of Iraq through the story of Samir’s family, which is now scattered around the world. His aim is to explain how the family’s hopes for a modern, secular and democratic Iraq have been crushed by internal political struggles and external forces. Opens Nov. 27. 

In the documentary “Stink!” director John Whelan, a single father, notices a stench coming from a pair of his daughter’s new pajamas and tries to investigate the source of the odor. His inquiry takes him on a journey leading to encounters with political and corporate operatives, all trying to shield the chemical industry. Opens Dec. 4.

In “The Night Before,” co-producer Seth Rogen also co-stars as Isaac, a Jewish father-to-be who joins two childhood friends for their last Christmas Eve together in New York. Opens Nov. 20. 

Holiday films celebrate women Read More »

Isaac Herzog wants ‘NATO-like’ alliance of Israel and moderate Arab states

In the mind of Israel’s opposition leader, Labor Party chief Isaac Herzog, the array of threats in the Middle East these days present Israel with a historic opportunity.

Yes, Palestinians are stabbing Israelis daily. Yes, Israel arguably has its most right-wing government since Benjamin Netanyahu’s first term as prime minister, in the late 1990s. Yes, Obama administration officials conceded last week that they have given up on achieving an Israeli-Palestinian peace deal during the remainder of the president’s term, which ends in January 2017.

But in Herzog’s view, the rise of the Islamic State and the threat of a nuclear Iran offer an extraordinary opportunity for a “NATO-like” alliance of Israel and moderate Arab states.

Given their common enemies and interests, Herzog says, the Jewish state can work with Egypt, Jordan, the Gulf states and others to curb the expansion of Iranian power, contain the Islamic State, facilitate intelligence sharing, and propel Israelis and Palestinians back to the negotiating table.

“Despite the fact that we’re in a terror wave of stabbings and throwings of stones and casualties and another painful moment between Jew and Arab in the Holy Land, despite all of that we must look beyond that and take steps that can change the course of history in the region,” Herzog told a group of reporters Wednesday in a meeting in Manhattan organized by the Israel Policy Forum.

“There is a unique opportunity in this region, which stands from a convergence of interests between moderate Arab states that surround us – some of them our immediate neighbors, such as Egypt and Jordan, together with nations such as Morocco, or Saudi Arabia, the Gulf states and others – who have common interests by the fact that they are seeing ISIL as a major threat and they see Iran as a major threat and they share a common interest with Israel,” he said.

The question for Herzog is: What’s his game plan for getting from here to there?

Netanyahu has a firm grip on power, Labor has won the premiership only once since the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin 20 years ago, and Israel’s demographic trends bode ill for the left wing. The right-leaning haredi Orthodox represent the fastest-growing segment of the population, most of the 1 million Russian-speaking immigrants who came to Israel in the 1990s are hawkish and the liberal Israelis of metropolitan Tel Aviv increasingly have been splitting their vote between Labor and parties that focus on socioeconomic issues, like Yesh Atid.

Asked by JTA about his strategy for future electoral success given these trends, Herzog argued that Israelis would eventually wake up to the fact that Netanyahu’s approach of “living by the sword” alone is not sustainable. But he offered little by way of a road map for how he would translate that recognition into votes for Labor.

And paradoxically, though he described Netanyahu on Wednesday as totally lacking a vision of hope for Israel, Herzog said he wouldn’t rule out supporting Netanyahu if the prime minister made a bid for a “historic change” in the region.

Herzog left open the question of the likelihood of Netanyahu taking such a step. For all his experience dealing with, running against and responding to Netanyahu, Herzog still doesn’t seem to have the prime minister figured out.

Herzog didn’t give Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas a free pass, calling him a “complicated and difficult person.” But Herzog insisted that Abbas nonetheless “stands up against terror.”

As for how Herzog would jump-start the peace process, he said he would freeze settlement building outside the large settlement blocs that Israel expects to keep as part of a final-status agreement, go speak at the Palestinian parliament in Ramallah and demonstrate that the two sides “understand each other’s pain.”

In any final-status accord, Herzog said, there should be mutual recognition of each other’s nation-states and ironclad security arrangements for both sides. That includes, he noted, Israel keeping the Jordan River Valley as a security corridor.

Herzog came to the United States to speak at the General Assembly of the Jewish Federations of North America in Washington, D.C., and for a United Nations event here marking the 40th anniversary of the infamous “Zionism equals racism” resolution. Herzog’s late father, Chaim Herzog, who was Israel’s U.N. ambassador at the time, famously tore up a copy of the resolution in his  speech that day to the U.N. General Assembly.

Though Herzog’s U.S. visit this week received far less attention than Netanyahu’s, the opposition leader refuses to stop talking about his alternative vision for Israel.

“I, as leader of the opposition, keep on saying time and again I’m not willing to give up,” Herzog said. “I am not willing to say that there is no hope. We must move on, try again.

“Despite the fact that now it looks gloomy, sad and horrific, despite the fact that 12-year-old stabs 12-year old, despite the fact that there is endless brainwashing and hate and the relationship between Jew and Arab is at one of its lowest points, nonetheless one has to create hope.”

Isaac Herzog wants ‘NATO-like’ alliance of Israel and moderate Arab states Read More »

Trump: Bibi is ‘devastated’ over the Iran deal

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump unleashed a barrage of fire over what he described as being wrong in America in an over 90-minute campaign speech in Fort Dodge, Iowa, Thursday evening.

During his speech, which included personal insults on two of his closest rivals in the race, Trump also lashed out at Hillary Clinton, saying she was the “worst Secretary of State,” only to immediately draw it back.

“Probably John Kerry might go down as the worst because, honestly, Kerry made the Iran deal,” Trump said. “He may be the best thing that’s happened to Hillary; he made the most incompetent deal I’ve ever seen.” Later on, Trump came back to highlight’s Hillary’s record as Sec. of State. “Think of Hillary, every single thing that she touched turned to garbage. The entire Middle East in her rein and the rein of Barack Obama went to hell.” Adding, “It’s only going to get worse. I know Hillary, I am from New York.”

Trump also reiterated comments he’s made in the past about the President’s policy on Israel. “Israel has been treated so badly by Obama – it’s beyond belief – I’ve so many Jewish friends, and they are really good friends, and great people, and they supported Obama – it is almost like automatic, ‘Oh, we’re having a fundraiser’ — He’s been a horror,” the presidential hopeful said. “He is one of the worst things that has ever happened to Israel. President Obama is one of the worst things. I mean, that Iran deal — Bibi Netanyahu is a good guy – I actually did commercials for his reelection. I’m one of the only celebrities; he wanted me to do a commercial, I did a commercial, and he won. So, I am happy. Okay? — But he’s a good guy –and he’s devastated over that. That deal will lead to nuclear proliferation and made a terrorist nation rich.”

Over the next five minutes, Trump went on to criticize the deal in length, repeating statements he’s written in his book, “Crippled America,” over the matter. “I would’ve never given them back the $15o billion. I would’ve told them, ‘The money of off the table. Now, let’s negotiate,’” he stated. Adding that the deal shouldn’t have taken more than “a week, if things are bad.”

Trump: Bibi is ‘devastated’ over the Iran deal Read More »

Why don’t Italians put cheese on seafood pasta?

1. Italians are very conscious of topography when it comes to food. Cheese and seafood are traditionally not paired because pre-modernity, they weren’t even available in the same location! Cows are typically bred in grasslands in flatter regions of northern Italy, while the best seafood pasta comes from the rocky shores of southern Italy. Hence, Italians don’t put milk from a large land animal on top of the meat of a tiny sea creature.

2. Even more importantly, Italians see it as almost criminal to overpower or alter the delicate flavor of seafood. Italians revere the pure taste of the sea. Using cheese on top of seafood masks its subtle and sublime essence. Americans think cheese tastes good on seafood pasta because our palates aren’t trained to be patient with nuanced flavors. Let your tongue learn to love the power of “less is more,” like the Italians do. And please don’t shoot the messenger, but if you’re asking for cheese on top of your seafood pasta, I can promise you, your waiter is making fun of you. And in Italy, they will likely refuse your request.

Learn how to make the best ever “>mealandaspiel.com

Why don’t Italians put cheese on seafood pasta? Read More »

Kerry: Defeat ‘Zionism is racism’ by confronting anti-Semitism, advancing 2 states

The struggle to defeat the notion that Zionism is racism persists both in the battle against resurgent anti-Semitism and the efforts to arrive at a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Secretary of State John Kerry said.

“Too many outside this room fail to recognize the global reality of anti-Semitism today,” Kerry said at an event Wednesday marking 40 years since Chaim Herzog, Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, spoke against the U.N. General Assembly’s resolution equating Zionism with racism.

“Too many fail to realize that a witch’s brew of old prejudices and new political grievances and economic troubles and nationalism combine to create dangerous new openings for extremism. So Herzog and Moynihan together have left us a major responsibility to continue to tell the world that anti-Semitism is as abhorrent and vile today as it was in 1975.”

Daniel Patrick Moynihan, then the U.S. ambassador to the body, also spoke out against the motion, which eventually passed in 1975 but was rescinded in 1991. Herzog famously tore up a copy of the resolution at the conclusion of his speech.

Kerry, who led an unsuccessful bid in 2013 and 2014 to conclude an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement, said that arriving at a two-state solution was critical to maintaining the Zionist dream.

“The Zionist dream embraces the concept of Israel as a Jewish democracy, a beacon of light to all nations,” he said. “And that dream can only be upheld by two states living side by side in peace and security. And we all know, from years of discussion and effort, this is not an impossible dream. It is achievable.”

The event was co-sponsored by the Israeli mission to the United Nations, the American Jewish Committee and the Chaim Herzog Public Council. The American Jewish Committee led the effort to rescind the 1975 resolution.

On hand were the two sons of Herzog, who went on to become the president of Israel: Isaac Herzog, currently the leader of the opposition Zionist Camp party in Israel, and Mike Herzog, a retired general. Also present was Ban Ki-moon, the U.N. secretary-general.

“The reputation of the United Nations was badly damaged by the adoption of resolution 3379, in and beyond Israel and the wider Jewish community,” Ban said. “As we commemorate Chaim Herzog’s words, I appeal to the community of nations to always act to uphold the principles of the United Nations Charter ‘to practice tolerance and live together in peace with one another as good neighbors.’”

Kerry: Defeat ‘Zionism is racism’ by confronting anti-Semitism, advancing 2 states Read More »

Netanyahu’s office to match Jewish Agency funding to Reform, Conservative movements

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office will match funding given by the Jewish Agency for Israel to the country’s Conservative and Reform movements, according to an agency spokesman.

The Jewish Agency provides some $1.09 million each in annual funding to Israel’s Reform and Conservative movements, in addition to $546,000 in funding to Israeli Orthodox congregations. According to Jewish Agency spokesman Avi Mayer, the Prime Minister’s Office plans to match that funding.

On Tuesday, Netanyahu said in a speech to the Jewish Federations of North America General Assembly that the government “is joining with the Jewish Agency to invest in strengthening Reform and Conservative communities within Israel.”

“As prime minister of Israel, I will always ensure that all Jews can feel at home in Israel – Reform Jews, Conservative Jews, Orthodox Jews – all Jews,” he said.

Netanyahu also mentioned in the speech a roundtable of representatives from Jewish religious movements and government ministries formed to address the movements’ concerns. The roundtable was first announced in July, though JTA has learned that it has yet to formally convene. There has, however, been regular communication between the government, the Jewish Agency and non-Orthodox streams on their concerns.

Reform and Conservative leaders praised Netanyahu’s remarks as an indication of the government’s commitment to strengthening Jewish pluralism in Israel.

“I hope and am optimistic regarding the commitment of the prime minister, and his ability to fulfill what he promised,” said Yizhar Hess, CEO of the Israeli Conservative movement. “If Israel is the state of the Jewish people, all members of the Jewish people need to feel they’re a part of it.”

On Wednesday, haredi Orthodox politicians from the United Torah Judaism in Israel party criticized Netanyahu’s remarks and lambasted the Reform movement. Knesset member Moshe Gafni accused Reform Judaism of “stabbing the holy Torah in the back,” while Knesset member Yisrael Eichler accused Reform groups of funding anti-Israel activity and said they “incite against everything that is Jewish.”

Netanyahu’s office to match Jewish Agency funding to Reform, Conservative movements Read More »