fbpx

November 12, 2015

Is a One-State Solution Completely Implausible?

Daniel Polisar, the Provost of the right-leaning Shalem College in Jerusalem, just published a report titled “What do the Palestinians Want?” (link below) in which he reviews Palestinian attitudes about Israel and Jews.

Israeli polls show the mirror image of Israeli Jewish attitudes about Palestinians.

Meta-surveys suggest that Palestinians don’t think highly of Israelis and Jews, and Israeli Jews don’t have much sympathy for Palestinians.

Alarmed by the Polisar report, I sent it to Noah Efron, the host of TLV1’s “The Promised Podcast” based in Tel Aviv, and suggested that they discuss it on a segment. They obliged, and Noah and his colleagues, Dan Futterman, the head of the Moriah Fund, and Bradley Burston, an Haaretz Journalist (and incidentally, an old friend from my college years at UC Berkeley) addressed the issue in today's (November 12) broadcast.

They discussed, among other things, the agenda of the author of the report, the credibility of the figures, the meaning of the surveys, and what political implications they might augur for the future.

They wondered aloud about the three possibilities facing Israel and the Palestinians  – a two-states for two peoples solution (Is it possible?); a single-state for two peoples (Is it implausible?); and the status-quo (Is it sustainable?)

It ought to be kept in mind as you read and listen that Israelis and Palestinians have lived in stressful times ever since the Rabin assassination twenty years ago. Polls taken during times of violence and heightened anxiety are likely to measure more extreme attitudes than might be the case during more peaceful times. Additionally, the vast majority of the Palestinian population and much of the Israeli Jewish population are under the age of 25 years, and thus have never known times of quiet and peace, so the possibility of co-existence is foreign.

Both Polisar's article and “The Promised Podcast” are worthy of our attention.

What Do Palestinians Want?mosaicmagazine.com/essay/2015/11/what-do-palestinians-want/

The Promised Podcast — “They Really Don’t Like Us!” Edition – (this segment begins at 14 minutes into the Podcast) – http://tlv1.fm/full-show/2015/11/12/the-they-really-dont-like-us-edition/?utm_source=A+View+from+Moriah+Newsletter&utm_campaign=e4f659d8ab-Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_5acf0b619c-e4f659d8ab-92533981

Is a One-State Solution Completely Implausible? Read More »

There’s a new Kinky Friedman in town

Kinky Friedman, the legendary “Texas Jewboy” country singer and raconteur, has recorded his first studio album in 32 years.

“It was a long time between dreams,” Friedman said. “My friend Brian Molnar badgered me into making this album. He produced it on the ranch in Texas. It has very few moving parts — it’s stripped down to the soul.” 

Titled “The Loneliest Man I Ever Met,” the album is a deeply soulful and enchantingly melancholy departure from the singer-songwriter-comedian’s humorous and satirical works, such as “Ride ’Em Jewboy” and “They Ain’t Makin’ Jews Like Jesus Anymore.” The album includes three original tracks and nine reimaginings of some of Friedman’s favorite songs by artists such as Willie Nelson, Tom Waits, Will Hoover, Warren Zevon, Merle Haggard, Johnny Cash and Bob Dylan, among others. 

“I have a personal connection with every song,” Friedman said. “ ‘Pickin’ Time’ by Johnny Cash was my father’s favorite song. I was friends with Warren Zevon and am friends with Tom Waits and Bob Dylan. My songs aren’t covers. In order to do a cover, you need to have a voice in the mainstream that’s recognizable, which I don’t. You need to be a Louis Armstrong, Neil Young or Joni Mitchell. In my case, it’s more of an interpretation. These songs are halfway between the way I do it and the way they do it. Sometimes, it’s harder to deliver someone else’s song than it is your own.” 

The fourth track on the album, “My S—’s F—ed Up” by the late Zevon, particularly resonated with Friedman. 

“It’s a very apt description not just of one man dying of cancer, but also the plight of America and the world. People laugh at the beginning of the song, and then they kind of ‘get’ it.”

Although each song may seem idiosyncratic, a unified emotion ties together the album.

“I think all of these songs are romantic,” Friedman said. “That might be a kind word for it, but what it really means is tragic. True love is a hostage situation. Romeo and Juliet are the best example: If they lived happily ever after, we wouldn’t even know their names. … As a rabbi, David Wolpe, once said, ‘The only whole heart is a broken one.’ You have to have a broken heart to like a record like this. It leaves a lot of room for imagination.” 

Friedman’s new songs don’t overtly address his Jewishness, though identity is central to the album’s meaning. 

“As a poet said, ‘Jewish eyes are handcuffs.’ You can’t get away. The most important vantage point for an artist is to be outside looking in, and the Jews always are,” he said.

The album’s final song, “A Nightingale Sang in Berkeley Square,” written by Eric Maschwitz and Manning Sherwin, has particularly resonated with many listeners, Friedman said.

“It was an early World War II song and might seem very eccentric and obscure today, not the kind of thing the people would naturally turn to. However, it seems to have connected in a haunting way with a lot of people.” 

Although the album is steeped in tragedy, Friedman still found levity in his collaboration with longtime friend Nelson, who co-produced the first track, “Bloody Mary Morning.” 

“I don’t smoke pot,” Friedman said. “I only smoke with Willie. When recording a song, I got so high that I needed a stepladder to scratch my ass. My timing went right out the window. I thought the song was going on for an hour, but it was really going on for three minutes.” 

It was important to Friedman to maintain his own artistic vision when directing the album. 

“This album isn’t for millennials,” he said. “It was made for a silent witness. That’s whom I was playing for, not for anybody else. We are navigating a Miley Cyrus world. You have to disregard Nashville, Hollywood, New York and every place in between, and just do it the way you want. You must make a record like this obliquely. You can’t aim to please. You just have to be a wandering Jew.” 

Kinky Friedman will perform Dec. 4 at the Ventura Improv Company Theater in Ventura, (for tickets visit venturaimprov.com), and Dec. 5-6  at McCabe’s Guitar Shop in Santa Monica (for tickets, visit mccabes.com).

There’s a new Kinky Friedman in town Read More »

Songs in the key of Nero

It may be hard to believe there was a time when George Gershwin’s “Rhapsody in Blue,” now a durable fixture of the American and international concert repertory, was thought of as suspect — an unclassifiable mix of concert music and jazz whose popularity seemed offensive to highbrow audiences. 

Pianist and conductor Peter Nero can relate. Classically trained in pop and jazz, Nero is something of a hybrid, and record companies had a hard time marketing his irrepressibly inventive, technically fluent and unpredictable playing.

“Today I’d be called a ‘crossover artist,’ ” Nero, 81, said recently from his home in Philadelphia. “But in 1961, RCA Victor [now RCA Records] didn’t know what to do with me, so they started by changing my name from Bernard Nierow to Peter Nero.”

Gershwin’s immortal “Rhapsody” caps off Nero’s upcoming concert at the Valley Performing Arts Center (VPAC) in Northridge on Nov. 14. Called “Peter Nero: Gershwin in Hollywood,” the program is actually in two parts, with “Gershwin on Broadway” kicking off the program’s first half. The show also features Michael Barnett, Nero’s principal bass player for nearly 30 years, and vocalist Katherine Strohmaier. 

The Hollywood half of the program includes Gershwin’s “They Can’t Take That Away From Me,” composed, with lyrics by his brother Ira, for the 1937 film “Shall We Dance.” That score represents Gershwin’s sole Academy Award for best original song. Most of the Hollywood-era songs, including “A Foggy Day” from 1937’s “A Damsel in Distress,” and “Let’s Call the Whole Thing Off,” another classic from “Shall We Dance,” appeared posthumously — George Gershwin died in July 1937 at age 38.

Nero’s immersion in Gershwin’s work deepened with “Rhapsody in Blue.” Nero was 17 when he appeared on national television performing “Rhapsody” with Paul Whiteman, the bandleader who commissioned the piece in 1924. 

“Gershwin was ahead of his time,” Nero said. “He synthesized classical and jazz and took it a step further. No matter how many times I play that piece, I marvel at the harmonic, melodic and rhythmic structure he conceived.”

Nero, who won a Grammy for best new artist in 1961, went on to record some 70 albums, including the hit “Summer of ’42.” His many television appearances included guest spots on “The Ed Sullivan Show” and “The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson.”

Early on, Nero was one of the most respected of Gershwin interpreters. In 1972, he won an Emmy for the NBC special “S’Wonderful, S’Marvelous, S’Gershwin.” Classical pianist Vladimir Horowitz used to attend his concerts and the two quickly became good friends. 

Thor Steingraber, VPAC executive director, said Nero — who was founding music director and conductor of the Philly Pops orchestra for many years — is one of the most decorated figures in the history of the popular American  songbook. “He’s walking history, with an encyclopedic mind,” Steingraber said.

Indeed, Nero has worked with luminaries including Frank Sinatra, Mel Torme, Ray Charles, Dizzy Gillespie, Johnny Mathis, Elton John and Rod Stewart. 

Born Bernard Nierow in Brooklyn, N.Y., to a Ukrainian-Jewish father who was a social worker and a Sephardic-Jewish mother who taught Spanish and French in New York City high schools, Nero said his interest in jazz was looked down upon at home.

“My mother wanted me to become a classical pianist,” said Nero, who, as a 13-year-old, won a scholarship to the Juilliard School preparatory division. “But I was a rebel. When I thought she wasn’t listening, I started messing around with a tune on the radio called ‘Bumble Boogie.’ It was ‘Flight of
the Bumblebee’ played in boogie-woogie fashion. It was a hit record. In those days, you could have a No. 1 hit on piano.” 

After four years at Juilliard prep and the High School of Music and Art, Nero began to get gigs while  attending Brooklyn College. “I grew up in the clubs,” he said. “In 1957, I played an eight-week gig in the lounge of the Tropicana in Las Vegas. Then they extended it, so I took an apartment and did my college work there.” 

Nero wound up playing the Tropicana for two years while earning his bachelor’s degree in music. He was 23 years old.

“We were part of the casino, and nobody listened,” he said. “People sat with their backs to us, watching the celebrities walk by … It was a great place to experiment.”

Nero’s teachers and mentors include Abram Chasins, the late concert pianist, lecturer and music director of WQXR (the radio station owned for many years by The New York Times), and Chasins’ wife, pianist Constance Keene, who took Nero on as a student for five years. Chasins, who actually knew Gershwin, wrote of the composer’s “incredible ease, joyous spontaneity and originality at the piano.” 

The same can be said of Nero’s striking improvisational technique. “I started improvising when I was 12,” he said, “and decided I’m going to do my own thing. I’ve always kept my chops in shape, so I can execute the ideas that appear in my head.”

“Baruch,” Nero’s Hebrew name, means “blessed.” And Nero’s hands are still blessedly nimble, while his mind remains sharp. “I do the crosswords,” Nero said, by way of explanation. “Eighty is the new 60.” 

But he’s been noticing that his posture at the piano isn’t what it used to be. “My teachers [Chasins and Keene] watched Horowitz at the piano, and they taught me his perfect weight transfer for hands and keys by using the body. But as I get older, I’m starting to hunch over the instrument,” he said. “It’s what nature does to the body.”

As conductor of the Philly Pops orchestra, Nero would talk to the audience, a tradition he’ll continue for his upcoming VPAC gig. Nero said he also will be available after the concert for a meet-and-greet. 

“I learned from Victor Borge how to engage an audience,” he  said. “I can talk and conduct at the same time.”

As Nero jumped back and forth during the conversation from one era to another, he could be hard to keep up with. One moment, he recalled his teacher, famed Swedish conductor Sixten Ehrling; in another, he turned to affectionate memories of his friend and mentor Henry Mancini. 

Given Nero’s long history in the world of classical, pop and jazz music, one might wonder why there is no memoir from the ebullient pianist, conductor and raconteur.

“You wanna write it?” Nero asked, in a brash Brooklyn accent. “Every time I get started telling one story, I think of another. Besides, I would have to tell the truth, and that could get me into trouble.”

Songs in the key of Nero Read More »

Top Israeli composer takes a ‘Journey’ to Los Angeles

Israeli urban legend has it that great musicians from the former Soviet Union who made aliyah first had to pick up brooms instead of instruments, working as street sweepers as they sought work in their talents. The story of Josef Bardanashvili’s rise to become one of Israel’s foremost composers lends some credence to that legend. 

In 1996, a year into realizing his Zionist calling at age 47, this famous Georgian composer had no choice but to supplement his music with a job as a manual laborer at a supermarket in Tel Aviv to pay his mortgage.

“I didn’t have the language. I couldn’t teach. [I was] a musician, so, at the same time, I wrote music,” Bardanashvili said in fluent Hebrew during an interview with the Journal near the Tel Aviv office for the Israeli Ministry of Culture, where he was about to serve as part of a jury to select the winner of The Arik Einstein Prize for composers over age 60 — an indication of how far he’s come since then.

He got to stop stocking shelves rather quickly. Musical placements in theater and commissions started rolling in, and, two years into his aliyah, he became the recipient of a prize —– the first of many — from ACUM, the Israeli artists rights agency, for a composition he wrote for Israeli operatic sensation David Daor.

Years later, Bardanashvili reinvented the stature he had enjoyed in his hometown of Batumi, where he served as director of the Batumi College of Music. Today, he teaches at music academies throughout Israel and composes regularly for theater, film, and ensembles in the Jewish state and abroad. On Nov. 11, at the Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts, Angelenos can witness another of his triumphant crescendos when “A Journey to the End of the Millennium” will be the Israeli centerpiece of the nationwide tour of the Israel Philharmonic Orchestra (IPO), organized by American Friends of the Israel Philharmonic Orchestra as part of the philanthropic organization’s 35th anniversary festivities. Bardanashvili is flying in for the concert, hoping also to catch quality time with a daughter and grandchildren who live in Los Angeles.

The piece — selected personally by IPO maestro Zubin Mehta, a longtime colleague of Bardanashvili — is a symphonic treatment of the composer’s groundbreaking Hebrew opera, which was commissioned 10 years ago by the New Israeli Opera on the occasion of its 20th anniversary. Through his signature polystylistic approach, combining elements of classical, romantic, liturgical, folk, vanguard and jazz, Bardanashvili sought to dramatize the conflicting traditions and beliefs of Sephardi and Ashkenazi Jews as portrayed in the A.B. Yehoshua novel of the same name and on which the opera was based. 

“It’s a big honor — and it’s a big honor for Israeli music,” Bardanashvili said of his inclusion in the program. 

Israeli “classical” music (a term that, Bardanashvili points out, is often used anachronistically) is often overshadowed by the general public’s preoccupation with popular music. Bardanashvili hopes to be instrumental in raising the profile of contemporary Israeli classical music, as well as the next generation of Israeli composers.

“We have many successes, but little is written about it,” he said, citing one of his students, Avner Dorman, as an example of an Israeli composer who enjoys success in the United States. “We’re more nestled in our own world, but we are the story of the birth of music.”

The melting pot that is Israel, he believes, cooks up a diverse, rich musical culture worthy of international attention. “The synthesis creates something crazy, big,” he said.

This synthesis has been reflected in Bardanashvili’s own life and music. He came to Israel in the footsteps of his family, a proud, traditional Jew from a land he loved and still loves for its beauty and the opportunities it gave him as a composer. He continues to receive commissions from the country of his birth, Georgia. 

“Even if I weren’t successful here, I’d be very happy,” he said. “As the Jewish saying goes: ‘Change your place, change your fortune.’ I wanted to be in a different place, part of my nation. It’s important to me.” 

A self-proclaimed “man of the sea,” Bardanashvili currently lives in Bat Yam, a coastal city near Tel Aviv, which he chose because it reminds him, in name and topography, of his hometown of Batumi, overlooking the Black Sea. He counts another significant achievement, a creation that mirrors his mixed ethnic music. 

“My children are now Israeli — with the Georgian beauty.”

The Israel Philharmonic Orchestra performs at The Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts on Nov. 11. For more information, visit thewallis.org.

Top Israeli composer takes a ‘Journey’ to Los Angeles Read More »

Two suicide bombers hit Hezbollah bastion in Lebanon, 43 killed

At least 43 people were killed and more than 240 wounded on Thursday in two suicide bomb blasts claimed by Islamic State in a crowded residential district in Beirut's southern suburbs, a stronghold of the Shi'ite Muslim group Hezbollah.

The explosions were the first attacks in more than a year to target a Hezbollah stronghold inside Lebanon, and came at time when the group is stepping up its involvement in the Syrian civil war — a fight which has brought Sunni Islamist threats and invective against the Iran-backed Shi'ite group.

Hezbollah has sent hundreds of fighters to support Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's forces in the four-year-old conflict over the border. Government forces backed by Hezbollah and Iranian troops have intensified their fight against mostly Sunni insurgents, including Islamic State, since Russia launched an air campaign in support of Assad on Sept. 30.

Syria's civil war is increasingly playing out as a proxy battle between regional rivals, including Iran and Saudi Arabia, which supports the rebels. The two foes also back opposing political forces in Lebanon, which suffered its own civil war from 1975 to 1990, and where a political crisis has been brought about by factional and sectarian rivalries.

The blasts occurred almost simultaneously late on Thursday and struck a Shi'ite community center and a nearby bakery in the commercial and residential area of Borj al-Barajneh, security sources said. A closely guarded Hezbollah-run hospital is also nearby.

Health Minister Wael Abu Faour said 43 people were killed and 240 people were wounded.

Islamic State said in a statement posted online by its supporters that its members blew up a bike loaded with explosives in Borj al-Barajneh and that when onlookers gathered, a suicide bomber blew himself up among them. The group said the attacks killed 40 people.

Hezbollah vowed to continue its fight against “terrorists”, warning of a “long war” against its enemies.

Medics rushed to treat the wounded after the explosions, which damaged shop fronts and left the street stained with blood and littered with broken glass.

Interior Minister Nouhad Machnouk said a third suicide bomber had been killed by one of the explosions before he could detonated his own bomb. His body was found nearby.

It was a blow to Hezbollah's tight security measures in the area, which were strengthened following bombings last year. The army had also set up checkpoints around the southern suburb entrances.

'UNJUSTIFIABLE ATTACKS'

A series of bomb blasts struck Lebanon in 2013 and 2014, including attacks on Hezbollah strongholds. Most of them were claimed by Sunni militants in response to Hezbollah sending fighters to Syria to fight in support of Assad.

Hezbollah's involvement has brought many threats against it in Lebanon.

Security forces say they have foiled a number of attacks inside the country recently and dismantled terror cells. A security source said a man wearing a suicide vest was arrested in Tripoli on Thursday, and a bomb dismantled in the northern city.

The attacks drew a wave of condemnation across the country's political spectrum, including some of Hezbollah's opponents. 

Lebanonese Prime Minister Tammam Salam condemned the attacks as “unjustifiable”, and called for unity against “plans to create strife” in the country, urging officials to overcome their differences. France's foreign ministry also condemned the attacks.

The war in Syria, with which Lebanon shares a border of more than 300 km (190 miles), has ignited sectarian strife in the multi-confessional country, leading to bombings and fighting between supporters of the opposing sides in Syria.

Gun battles broke out in Tripoli last year in clashes that involved the army and Islamist militants, and regular infiltrations of Islamists from Syria into a Lebanese border town still draw army or Hezbollah fire.

The bombers also struck as Lebanese lawmakers held a legislative session for the first time in over a year. A political crisis has left the country without a president for 17 months, with the government failing to take even basic decisions.

Religious leaders warned last year that in the absence of a head of state, sectarian strife was threatening a country that was gripped for 15 years by its own civil war.

Two suicide bombers hit Hezbollah bastion in Lebanon, 43 killed Read More »

Outside the tent or in — what would Matriarch Rebecca have said?

This past week I have been reflecting on something important. Is there a red line that propels someone beyond the pale and out of the tent if they cross it? It is a fundamental question for all of us, and particularly for a rabbi, whose job as a representative of Judaism is to be a benign and inclusive presence, so that as many Jews as possible can feel at home in a Jewish environment and more inclined to be faithful to their roots.

I was lucky enough in my teens and early twenties to spend a considerable amount of time with the late Rabbi Shlomo Carlebach, whose twenty first yahrtzeit we observed a couple of weeks ago. No one epitomized the broad tent approach more than him. His genuine affection for every Jew – and indeed, every human being – was nothing short of breathtaking. One of the most remarkable aspects of his personality, and one that I always marveled at, was his desire and ability to remember people’s names, even many years after he had met them.

“Do you remember me?” people would invariably ask him. He would look at them for a moment, his face pensive. Then he would break into a smile. “Sure I remember you,” he would say, “you’re Moshe, and we met in Cleveland at a concert in 1981,” or something similar. He was almost always right. It was the mark of a man who loved people enough to make the effort not just to remember their names when he first met them and for that day, but to file their names away so that he might delight them by recalling it to them many years later.

In my own interactions with people over the years I have tried hard to emulate Reb Shlomo. His openness, his refusal to judge someone who didn’t share his views, his determination to ensure that everyone felt comfortable within a Jewish setting – these qualities have been my inspiration. But is there a point at which unconditional tolerance becomes self-defeating? I want to believe that no Jew should ever be rejected or excluded. After all, whatever they do, they are still part of the family. Or are they?

Take Gideon Levy, for example. Levy, born in Israel in 1953, is on the left edge of Israeli politics and writes a regular column for Haaretz. He considers himself to be an Israeli patriot forced to blow the whistle on his country’s ‘crimes’ against the Palestinians. Just as an example of what this means, in a recent article he decried the indifference of ordinary Israelis towards the killing of Arab knife murderers, whom he astoundingly refers to as brave and courageous. For Israelis, he writes, “the bleeding body [of a dead stabber] on the street is not the body of a person; it is, in the eyes of many, a carcass. But a few minutes earlier it was still a human being, with desires, feelings and dreams……how many Israelis even think about this?” Aside from the fact that this characterization is utterly preposterous, I find it incredibly ironic that he accuses Israelis of dehumanizing Arabs when it is the dehumanization of Jews that has resulted in knife-wielding Arabs seeing every Jew as a ‘Temple Mount defiler’ and a murder target, even if they are a 72-year-old woman or a 13-year-old boy.

But the greatest irony of this ‘patriot’ is his sympathy with BDS and wholehearted support for a ‘one-state solution’. Isaac Herzog, leader of Israel’s left wing opposition, is not a Levy fan. He recently wrote in Haaretz: “Levy…. wants the Jewish minority between the Jordan and the sea to be swallowed up by the Arab majority, so that after 67 years we turn the lights out on the state.”

So do we include Gideon Levy in our tent? Must we unquestioningly embrace him as a family member, despite his views? Let’s take a look the intriguing Bible narrative that describes Isaac’s blessings for some help. There is almost no story in the Torah that is more disconcerting and disturbing than the narrative describing Isaac’s blessings. At face value it appears as if the blind, helpless patriarch was duped by Jacob, with the help of Rebecca. Isaac had designated Esau as the recipient of the legacy blessings – the formal passing over of Abraham’s covenant with God to the next generation. But through a carefully orchestrated deception it is Jacob who gets the blessings, not Esau.

Does this understanding of the story make any sense? I think not. The most obvious flaw is that if Jacob was not meant to receive the blessings why didn’t Isaac simply revoke what he had done, and redirect them back to Esau? Instead, as soon as he discovers what has happened he confirms his blessing of Jacob. In other words, notwithstanding the subterfuge, Jacob would still inherit the mantle of Abraham, and Esau was out.

So what was really going on? The nineteenth century bible commentator, Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch, offers an exquisite explanation. Isaac and Rebecca were engaged in a crucial debate about inclusion and exclusion. Isaac, only wanting to see the good side of Esau, felt that he had a role to play in Abraham’s legacy – as the ‘man of the field’ who would provide for Jacob. Rebecca disagreed. She had observed how Esau sold his birthright and then married idolaters. If he remained within, Abraham’s legacy was doomed. Only by demonstrating that it was possible for one person to embody both the ‘voice of Jacob’ and the ‘hands of Esau’ would Isaac understand his mistake.

Gideon Levy, by giving up his birthright and cavorting with idolaters, has demonstrated that he is outside the tent. He has lost the plot and joined the other team. Such a person, and anyone like him, can never be included in the tent, and it is our duty to ensure that they never are.

 

Outside the tent or in — what would Matriarch Rebecca have said? Read More »

Voices of Six-Day War haunt us decades later

The focus of the Israeli film “Censored Voices” is an aged, rapidly spinning, reel-to-reel tape recorder.

From the recorder emerge the voices of young Israelis just returned home to their kibbutzim after fighting and miraculously triumphing in the Six-Day War of 1967.

But their talk is not of battles won and heroic deeds by comrades, nor of a glorious homecoming, cheered by their fellow countrymen and by an admiring world after overwhelming the armed forces of five Arab countries.

The disembodied and often halting voices speak of watching Palestinians as their homes and farms are destroyed, of endless lines of wandering refugees, of humiliated Arab civilians stripped down to their underwear.

“We won,” declared one voice, “so the next war will be much crueler and deadlier.” Another voice expresses the fear that “a constant state of war can also destroy a nation.”

When the movie’s camera pans from the tape recorder and sweeps across the room, we see a group of elderly men listening intently, sometimes rubbing their eyes, other times staring as if to identify the voices emerging from the machine.

The voices the elderly men hear are their own, recorded nearly 50 years earlier, a few days to a couple of weeks after they returned from the Six-Day War.

With them is writer Amos Oz, who had originally convened the recording sessions, taking the tape recorder from kibbutz to kibbutz, whose young men traditionally served as the elite spearhead troops in Israel’s wars. Traveling with Oz was Avraham Shapira, who edited the tapes and excerpted them for a book.

During the days and weeks before June 5, when the war started, Israel was filled with a sense of foreboding and occasionally the sound of air raid sirens. Then came the call-up of reserves, under such code names as “Love of Zion” and “People of Labor,” and a grim feeling that “the country would be annihilated,” one soldier recalled.

With the destruction of the enemy’s air forces in the opening hours of the Six-Day War, followed by quick battle victories and entry into Jerusalem’s Old City, the country’s mood changed drastically.

The movie shows newsreels and archival footage of delirious dancing, songs praising the Lord of Israel, and less pious soldiers’ songs, such as “We’ll F— You Up.”

Both the initial fear of annihilation and the subsequent euphoria of victory evaporated for Israeli soldiers who actually experienced combat.

“My company lost 45 men; I kept hearing the cry of, ‘Medic, medic,’ over and over again. I was in despair,” recalled the voice of one veteran.

But, surprisingly, the worst memories of the Israeli soldiers were not of what the enemy was doing to them, but of what they themselves did to the enemy.

Different voices emerge from the tape recorder:

“We asked our commander for orders, and he said, ‘Kill as many as possible. Show no mercy.’ … I was outraged, but I didn’t protest.”

“We were shooting at some Egyptian soldiers. … They were not ducking, just falling down. … It was like some game at an amusement park or at a summer camp. … In war, we all became murderers.”

“The Egyptian prisoners of war came up with their water canteens filled with urine. We gave them some water and they kissed our feet.”

“When the enemy becomes your prisoner, you feel this power. You shove them roughly, all restraint disappears.”

“The Temple Mount is not holy, that’s not Judaism. It’s people that count. They blew the shofar at the Western Wall; it sounded like a pig’s squeal.”

When the tapes were initially transcribed and edited by Shapira into book form as “A Conversation With Soldiers” (in the English edition, “The Seventh Day”), Israeli authorities censored about 70 percent of the text.

That’s hardly surprising. What is amazing is that the book became an instant best-seller in Israel, and the nearly uncensored film version this year won the Israeli equivalent of the Oscar as the country’s best documentary.

The voice tapes themselves were locked away for decades, despite pleas by journalists and filmmakers, until a young Israeli film school graduate, Mor Loushy, persuaded Shapira to let her use them for a film.

It is difficult to conceive of another country, including the United States, that would give subsidies from government funds to make a film critical of its own soldiers in their most triumphant war, or whose film academy would award the film its top prize.

In a phone interview, however, director Loushy was not surprised her film had screened all across Israel without incident and little criticism.

The 33-year-old filmmaker is the mother of a 3-year-old boy and currently is almost eight months pregnant. Her forebears on her father’s side came from Persia to the Holy Land 10 generations ago; her mother was born in Poland.

She has faced no personal criticism in Israel. “After all,” she said, “it’s not my voice in the film but the voices of the soldiers who fought in the war.” She blames the current shootings and knife stabbings in Israel directly on the occupation after the 1967 war and sees little chance that Israelis and Palestinians will sit down for real peace negotiations.

Nevertheless, she refuses to give up, especially because of her children. “If I don’t have hope for the future, why stay here? I really have no choice,” she said.

Still, “Censored Voices” raises some critical questions. For one, how representative the soldiers heard in the film are of all the men who served in the Six-Day War, the Journal asked, to which Loushy gave no specific answer.

In another attempt to answer this question, this reporter’s wife has two relatives who served in the 1967 war, one on the left and one on the right, politically. Neither saw heavy combat, but both said they believed Israel’s survival was at stake and they had no regrets about serving in the war.

All that said, a legitimate concern has been raised by Yossi Klein Halevi, an American-born Israeli journalist and author, who has written extensively about the Six-Day War, and has worked for the reconciliation of Jews, Muslims and Christians in Israel.

“People abroad who don’t remember the way we do the circumstances of the Six-Day War will turn [this movie] into an indictment of Israel,” Halevi said. “If there were isolated acts of abuse by our soldiers, that should not become the narrative [of] what the Six-Day War was about. Many of us here [in Israel] are, frankly, sick and tired of the blame-Israel-first narrative.”

The Israel Film Festival will screen “Censored Voices” at 7:15 p.m. Nov. 12 at the Laemmle’s Town Center in Encino, and at 5 p.m. Nov. 15 at the NoHo 7 in North Hollywood. After that, the film will open Nov. 27 for one-week runs at the Royal Theatre in West Los Angeles and at the Town Center in Encino.  

Voices of Six-Day War haunt us decades later Read More »

A young, female visionary tackles musical theater

Tyne Rafaeli, 33, received her master’s degree in theater from Columbia University just last year, but already she is emerging as a wunderkind director to watch. She is the touring director of Bartlett Sher’s Broadway production of the musical “The Bridges of Madison County,” based on Robert James Waller’s 1992 best-selling novel, opening at the Ahmanson Theatre on Dec. 10. As such, she has guided the mostly new cast through the research and staging of the saga of an Italian immigrant housewife in 1960s Iowa whose staid life is shaken up by a torrid affair with a roving photographer. The musical has a book by Marsha Norman, with lyrics and Tony Award-winning music by Jason Robert Brown (“Parade”).

Concurrently, Rafaeli is serving as associate director of Sher’s revival of “Fiddler on the Roof,” which will open Dec. 20 at the Broadway Theatre in New York.

“Fiddler” marks Rafaeli’s sixth collaboration with Sher — she’s also been associate director of his revival of “The King and I” and the musical adaptation of Pedro Almodovar’s Oscar-nominated “Women on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown.”

Sher is known for his eclectic work, which has included not only musicals, but also dramas and even opera, and, Rafaeli said, “Fiddler” and “Bridges” could not take place in more vastly different environs. “Fiddler,” of course, is set in the fictional Eastern European shtetl of Anatevka at the turn of the last century and revolves around an observant Jewish family in flux; while “Bridges” unfolds in the small-town American Midwest.

But, Rafaeli said, she profoundly identifies with the characters in both productions, both as a woman and a Jew.

Tyne Rafaeli

In a telephone interview between rehearsals of “Fiddler” in New York, Rafaeli described how she experienced a direct familial connection to that musical during her extensive research about shtetl life for the production. “I explored the cultural, religious and social aspects, as well as the role of the family, which is really my family’s story,” she said.

Her father’s Byelorussian forebears “lived in that kind of shtetl and were divided between Zionists and socialists,” she said. “The socialists came to New York, and the Zionists went to Palestine.”

Rafaeli’s mother was raised in New York, while her father grew up in Tel Aviv and on a kibbutz in the Galilee; each “followed rock and roll to London in the 1960s,” met in film school in that city and stayed. The director is, by her own account, a “city girl” who grew up in London, lives in New York and has never been to Iowa.

Nor had she read Waller’s weepy romance before Sher approached her to work on “The Bridges of Madison County” a couple of years ago, although she had seen the 1995 film version starring Meryl Streep and Clint Eastwood. When it comes to romance novels, Rafaeli said, she prefers the “subversive” work of Jane Austen.

And yet she felt a profound connection with the material in its exploration of “the struggle between freedom and security, which is a Freudian idea,” she said. “It’s, ‘Do I stay with my family because I love them, or do I follow my heart?’ And that’s also extended into the conversation about a woman’s role in the center of this story. It’s really about a woman having agency or not having agency, and the lack of choice in 1965 for a woman in rural Iowa.”

The heroine, Francesca, hails from Naples after World War II, when her dull but stalwart future husband “came and gave her a way out of abject poverty and real deprivation and plight,” Rafaeli said. “And so she comes to this foreign culture in America and makes a new life for herself. But, years later, this new man, Robert, arrives and awakens something inside of her that makes her look at what she’s given up, and to reimagine the choices she has available to her. … Robert represents the person who can experience life and look outside of this small town and to the wider world.”

As Rafaeli immersed herself in research for the production, “Betty Friedan’s ‘The Feminine Mystique’ was really our Bible, in terms of what women’s lives and frustrations were about at that time,” she said. “It helped to contextualize our [heroine’s] narrative in a powerful way, because that book gave women a platform to express what had been previously inexpressible:  the profound sacrifice that housewives had made for their families.

“I also did a lot of research about Naples, during and after World War II, which was one of the worst-bombed cities in Europe,” she added. “I hadn’t realized the extent to which people were actually starving and that women were forced into prostitution to survive. If Francesca had remained in Naples, she could have been two steps away, potentially, from having to prostitute herself and to beg for food.”

The gratitude Francesca feels toward her husband for providing her with stability after all the postwar chaos complicates her extramarital affair.

Rafaeli trained as a serious competitive gymnast while growing up in a “deeply cultural and intellectual” Jewish home in England, which led her to explore dance and to study acting at the Guildhall School of Music & Drama in London, where she discovered her love for directing.

She was in her second year of graduate school at Columbia when veteran director Sher arrived to speak about his work at one of her classes. She hadn’t previously heard of Sher, but was quickly captivated by his wide-ranging approach to theater. “I was so struck and arrested by him,” she said. Their future collaboration was sealed when the two directors sat down for a meeting not long thereafter. “We discovered that we have a very similar value system and frame of reference,” Rafaeli recalled. “Our approach is very talmudic. We both are deep questioners, so when we’re working together, we’re in constant conversation and questioning the material and our choices.”

While Rafaeli was still at Columbia, Sher asked her to serve as his associate director on his Broadway revival of Clifford Odets’ “Golden Boy,” where she became deeply involved in the design process as well as the script work. “Bart put me in charge of looking for every draft of ‘Golden Boy’ that Odets ever wrote, and my research was biblical in proportion,” she said. “I went through a very rigorous process of notating in a very intricate way every change that Odets had made to his play, and we put some of that material back into the production.”

Rafaeli went on to serve as Sher’s associate director on the recent Broadway revival of “The King and I,” for which she researched the concept of polygamy as a political institution as well as how the monarch’s wives lived in virtual sexual slavery. 

“The connective tissue between all these pieces is that they ask very important questions about how we live now,” Rafaeli said. “By reviving certain classics and looking back, it can teach us something about our existence in the 21st century.”

In “Bridges,” both the warmth and the judgment of small-town life is represented by cast members who sit on the sides of the stage and operate like a Greek chorus, symbolizing the community.

“But the center of this piece is the duet between Francesca and Robert,” Rafaeli said. “The challenge is to track and shape how the relationship evolves and transforms; it’s the most intricate part of the work.”

“ ‘Fiddler on the Roof’ also brings up issues that resonate today,” she said. “We’ve just experienced the greatest refugee crisis since the Second World War; we can’t ignore these shocking and arresting images that come to us from Syria and the Mediterranean and not have a conversation with that as we talk about Jewish migration in the early 20th century.”

For tickets and information on “The Bridges of Madison County” visit centertheatregroup.org

A young, female visionary tackles musical theater Read More »

New Skirball exhibition channels the power of you

As we enter the holiday season of giving, many of us think about how we can donate our time and money in a meaningful way. A new exhibition at the Skirball Cultural Center aims to introduce visitors to people and organizations attempting to tackle issues of human rights and poverty around the world. And when people leave the galleries, they will be encouraged to turn their inspiration into action. 

“A Path Appears,” which runs Nov. 19 through Feb. 21, 2016, draws attention to grass-roots campaigns in the fields of health, education, jobs and empowerment (meaning civil and human rights). Each issue gets its own section of the exhibition — the curators call them “pavilions.”  

The show includes objects used in developing countries to overcome pressing problems. For example, a plastic drum used to transport water; a high-quality, low-cost prosthetic knee; a teddy bear handed out to comfort child refugees; and a center where young women and girls can go to feel comfortable talking about contraceptives in the setting of a beauty salon.

The exhibition draws from the stories in “A Path Appears: Actions for a Better World,” co-authored by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalists — and husband-wife team — Nicholas D. Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn. Their book celebrates creative solutions to everyday problems around the world. This project is the second collaboration between the authors and the Skirball. Their previous book, the 2009 best-seller “Half the Sky: Turning Oppression Into Opportunity for Women Worldwide,” which focused on threats women face around the world, including sex trafficking, prostitution, maternal mortality, violence and discrimination, became a Skirball exhibition in 2012. That show displayed photos and other multimedia materials about the plight of women and girls, most of them from Africa and Asia, and told stories of their brave fights to overcome those obstacles.

For “Half the Sky,” the Skirball approached Kristof and WuDunn about creating an exhibition that would turn the book into an interactive, immersive experience. This time around, the authors came to museum director Robert Kirschner to see if the Skirball would be interested in launching another exhibition around their work.

“We understand ourselves as a Jewish institution, and we spell that identification and commitment in terms of ideals that we understand to be intrinsically Jewish,” Kirschner said. 

Such values as freedom, equality, justice and human dignity are universal values, he said, but have been aligned with Jewish principles since biblical times. 

“When we did ‘Half the Sky,’ for instance, we cited the verse that applies to this project as well, from the Book of Leviticus, that you shall not stand idly by while your neighbor bleeds,” Kirschner said.

Students attend class at the Kibera School for Girls in Nairobi, Kenya, founded by Shining Hope for Communities (SHOFCO). SHOFCO combats gender inequality and extreme poverty in urban slums by linking tuition-free schools for girls to holistic social services for all.

The show was designed in partnership with wHY Architecture, based in Culver City, and C&G Partners, based in New York. The two award-winning firms worked alongside exhibition fabrication firm Cinnabar to create what they describe as “a low-tech, high-charm approach” to the show. Each of the four pavilions uses a different genre of materials, including discarded automobile tires, compact discs, bubble wrap and newspapers. The materials relate to the content of each pavilion. 

Visitors can use a smartphone app and Web platform to help them take concrete actions connected to specific issues, such as early childhood education or forced child marriages. Each object or story is connected to an “action step” to be taken on the spot or afterward. 

The app is part of the social action tool ActionLab, a project of the Global Media Center for Social Impact at UCLA’s Fielding School of Public Health. Neal Baer, the guest curator of “A Path Appears,” is a pediatrician and Emmy-nominated writer and producer (“ER,” “Law & Order: SVU,” “Under the Dome”) who founded ActionLab as a way of bridging storytelling and social change. For example, one episode of “Law & Order: SVU” featured Jennifer Love Hewitt as a rape survivor whose rape kit had never been tested. The episode was accompanied by a campaign to pressure law enforcement officials to clear their backlog of rape kits. ActionLab currently is working with author Marion Nestle on her book “Soda Politics” to help people reduce sugary drinks in their homes, schools and communities.

“I was doing all these shows that have either social justice issues or public health issues, and people would often say to me, ‘I really liked that episode, and I wish I knew how to do something about that topic,’ ” Baer said. “It seemed natural to give people the action steps that they could take. I was finding that people were often inspired by a documentary or a TV show that I’d done, and yet they didn’t know what to do. And so we’re giving them the concrete actions that they can take to make a difference.”

In the “empowerment” pavilion of “A Path Appears,” visitors can watch a trailer for a documentary Baer produced called “If You Build It,” about high school students who built a farmers market in a low-income North Carolina town. Inspired visitors can use ActionLab to connect with a Los Angeles group that assigns architects and designers to contribute their time pro bono to projects in their own community, such as helping to design a recreation center.

The exhibition fits the Skirball’s track record of presenting exhibitions with a social justice component, including 2006’s “Rwanda/After, Darfur/Now,” 2009’s “Road to Freedom: Photographs of the Civil Rights Movement” and the current exhibition “Manzanar,” featuring photographs taken by Ansel Adams of the Japanese-American incarceration camp in Manzanar, Calif., during World War II, museum curator Erin Clancey said.

“I think ‘Half the Sky’ and ‘A Path Appears’ fit into that category of exhibition that speaks to our mission as a Jewish institution in terms of our values,” Clancey said.

Kirschner cited the Hebrew aphorism, “Lo ha’midrash hu ha’ikar, ela ha’ma’ase,” meaning, “It’s not what one says, but rather what one does.”

“A Path Appears” is at the Skirball Cultural Center from Nov. 19 through Feb. 21, 2016. Sheryl WuDunn will discuss the exhibition with Neal Baer on Nov. 17 at 8 p.m. Tickets are $12. For more information, visit New Skirball exhibition channels the power of you Read More »

‘The Man in the High Castle’: What if the Nazis had won?

It’s a scenario almost too horrifying to contemplate: What if the Allies had lost World War II and the Germans and Japanese ruled a conquered America? This chilling hypothetical is the premise of Philip K. Dick’s 1962 novel, “The Man in the High Castle,” as well as of the new series of the same name, which begins streaming Nov. 20 on Amazon Prime.

In the drama’s alternate reality, the occupied country is divided into The Greater Nazi Reich in the East, The Japanese Pacific States in the West and a neutral zone in the middle. Americans live without rights or freedoms and resistance is punishable by death, but an underground rebel movement exists and is central to the story. There’s also mistrust and tension between the ruling powers, as well as a secret newsreel at the center of the plot that could have cataclysmic consequences if it gets out. The opening sequence, set in New York, is visually shocking: An enormous swastika banner hangs over Times Square.

 “A project that’s alternative history, but rooted in real history, presents the possibility of confronting imagery that’s incredibly disturbing. But, at the same time, this world has an odd familiarity about it, and I think that’s what is so provocative about it,” producer David W. Zucker said in an interview. “Also, there are American Nazis, and, you wonder, how many clicks away are we from this potentially happening?”

With such a hot-button subject, it’s not surprising that the project took eight years to get made, despite big-name support coming in the form of Ridley Scott, an executive producer. “We couldn’t find a buyer in America. No one would touch it,” Zucker said. Development deals with the BBC and, later, Syfy fell through, and the option on the property ran out. Then, creator/writer/executive producer Frank Spotnitz sent it to Amazon in late 2014 and, with a green light, expanded the four-hour script to 10 hours. 

Although the fate of Jews in this society is not spelled out, at least at first, it is clear that minorities and the ill and infirm have been eliminated. In the second episode, a character who is not a practicing Jew but had a Jewish grandfather is brutally tortured for information, with the fate of his family held in the balance. The harrowing experience changes him, actor Rupert Evans said.

“He becomes radicalized. He takes matters into his own hands and decides to speak out and fight back.”

Rufus Sewell plays an American Nazi named John Smith, a character not in Dick’s novel, and he said he hesitated to accept the role at first. “We have an idea of Nazis, and, certainly, that’s based on truth and the horrors of everything that they did, but I wouldn’t be necessarily interested playing that, especially for a long period of time,” he said. “But when you meet his family in the second episode, and you see there’s another side to this person, I became interested.    

“Within his world,” Sewell said, “Smith is considered a good man, an all-American hero, and it’s that terrible irony — that you are capable of living within a system that is incredibly cruel and unjust, and you can still convince yourself that you are right. He ends up very, very conflicted.”

Sewell and other cast members delved into historical research to provide context, as did the creators, to lend verisimilitude to the 1962 setting. But the fictional premise informed everything from design, clothing and music to writing, movies and pop culture. 

“Everything requires an understanding of what was and a projection of what might have been,” Zucker said. “What would have been permitted? What stars would be allowed to make films and music? There was a lot to consider.”

Alexa Davalos, who plays key character Juliana Crain, did a lot of World War II research for her role as a Jewish partisan in “Defiance” in 2008, a role she found a lot more painful to portray. Born in Paris to American parents, she’s Lithuanian-Jewish on her father’s side. “The Man in the High Castle,” in contrast, “is historical supposition. It has this magical element and feels very different,” Davalos said.

Zucker, who also is Jewish, remembers watching Holocaust films in Hebrew school as a boy. “But it took me a long time to find a perspective that wasn’t an intellectual, academic one. It wasn’t an emotional reference for me, like it was for the earlier generation. It wasn’t until I saw ‘Europa Europa’ that I related for the first time to what it must have been like,” he said. “What I found so interesting about getting to work on a piece like this is I get a different experience of what it might have been like in a way I could more closely relate to.”

With the streaming premiere imminent, Zucker is eager to gauge worldwide reaction to “The Man in the High Castle,” particularly in Japan and Germany. If all goes as planned, he said, he looks forward to making many more episodes. “We have some really stunning storylines in mind for later seasons, when we start going more globally,” he said. “Let’s just say there are some very ironic, if not deeply provocative, alliances that develop in this world that didn’t in the one we have.

“Hopefully, it will be compelling as a drama and a hot topic.” 

‘The Man in the High Castle’: What if the Nazis had won? Read More »