fbpx

July 27, 2015

Letters to the editor: Iran Deal, David Azouly, swastikas in D.C. and more

Not a Gamblin’ Man

I disagree with Rob Eshman’s opening paragraph, wherein he states that “nobody knows” what the end result will be with the Iranian deal (“The Iran Deal Gamble,” July 17). Anyone who considers the current atmosphere with Iran, and the basic points of the agreement, should have no problem realizing that if the agreement is ratified, worldwide terrorism will increase significantly. Imagine what Iran, the greatest supporter of worldwide terrorism today, can do with $100 billion (while continuing the “Death to America and Israel” tirades). Anyone who believes that Iran will honor a written agreement is very naive (see Neville Chamberlain). 

I am afraid that my hopes and prayers that my 7-year-old granddaughter will live a long, happy and safe life will be in great jeopardy if the agreement is ratified.

Michael Gesas, Beverly Hills

I have read several of Eshman’s columns relating to support of President Barack Obama from the Jewish community. My sincere question is, how can Americans who call themselves Jewish support a president who is doing all he can do to make deals with Iran, a country hostile to the U.S. and particularly to Israel? His recent “deal” is not supported by the prime minister of Israel and is “a historic mistake.” The goal of any radical Muslim community is the annihilation of all Jews and unbelievers in this world. What should we be thinking with regard to the Jewish people and their support of Israel in general? Do American Jews even consider Israel worth saving? 

Bob Crisell, Fallbrook

Are Democrats Destroying Israel?

David Suissa’s piece “Iran: An Agreement to Empower Evil” is spot on (July 17). But the bigger issue is how American Jews can continue to support a Democratic Party that now seems hell-bent on turning a blind eye to the possible destruction of the State of Israel, if not actually facilitating Israel’s demise directly by supporting a president who would forge such an agreement as he and his proxy, Secretary of State John Kerry, have with the Iranians. And if Jewish Democrats think another Clinton in the White House will make a difference, they are sadly mistaken.

Marc Yablonka, Burbank

A Plague in D.C. 

Regarding Danielle Berrin’s article, not only will you find a swastika in the Washington, D.C., Holocaust Museum, but you will also find hundreds of swastikas on the building directly across the street from the museum (“Symbol-ic,” July 17). The swastikas on the side of this building facing the museum are hidden from view by shrubs. However the swastikas on the north side of this building are plainly visible. You can even see them on Google Maps by zooming in and jumping to Street View to look at the north wall of this building across the street from the Holocaust Museum.

Barry Bereskin, Calabasas

Intellectual Fodder or Cause for Fire?

Until American-Jewish leadership takes a firm and real stand by censoring the current Israeli government until [Israeli Minister of Religious Affairs David Azoulay]is fired and replaced by someone who has demonstrated an understanding of the Jewish world’s diversity, nothing will change in Israeli politics (“We Cannot Call You ‘Minister,’ ” July 17). The American-Jewish support will continue to be taken for granted.

Glenn Tamir via jewishjournal.com

I think we are on a political correctness bandwagon here. People are being sensitive for absolutely nothing. [Azoulay] did not mean to insult anyone. Perhaps it was an unfortunate utterance that does not belong in the public arena but within the yeshiva world is typical of chavrutot jousting. It’s a statement meant to start a discussion and indeed a debate about Jewishness. Reform Judaism is only 180 years old in a tradition that is 3,500 years old. So the question is an opinion of tradition versus modernity. It is modernity that has to justify its departure from tradition, not the other way round. He is challenging Reform Jews to justify their Jewishness, but instead of having a real, meaningful debate, everyone is a plaintiff who has been molested and is outraged that anyone would even bring up such a subject. This subject is not going away. Especially as Israel becomes more and more Jewish, the questions “What is Jewish?” and “Who is a Jew?” will become more and more acute. It is our tradition to debate stuff to death, not to whine because someone said something we are not willing to debate, or are intellectually incapable of debating.

Dale Moshe Sumbureru via jewishjournal.com

Letters to the editor: Iran Deal, David Azouly, swastikas in D.C. and more Read More »

Huckabee tweets that Obama is marching Israelis ‘to the door of the oven’

Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee cited threats from Israel’s enemies in his continued assault on the Iran nuclear deal.

A series of Twitter posts on Sunday night followed a day after Huckabee said that President Barack Obama will march Israelis “to the door of the oven.”

Bolstering his argument of the potential harm the agreement signed by Iran and world powers earlier this month would do to Israel, Huckabee tweeted quotes from Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and Hezbollah’s leader, Hassan Nasrallah, among others.“It is the mission of the Islamic Republic of Iran to erase Israel from the map of the region,” read one of the posts attributed to Khamenei.

A quote attributed to Nasrallah read: “If they [Jews] all gather in Israel, it will save us the trouble of going after them worldwide.”

Huckabee also said in a tweet, “Tell Congress to do their constitutional duty & reject the Obama-Kerry #IranDeal.”

In an interview Saturday with Breitbart News, Huckabee evoked Holocaust images of the ovens used to dispose of the bodies of Jews gassed in Nazi concentration camps.

“This president’s foreign policy is the most feckless in American history,” the former Arkansas governor said. “It is so naive that he would trust the Iranians. By doing so, he will take the Israelis and march them to the door of the oven.”

Obama criticized Huckabee’s comments on Monday while on a visit to Ethiopia, saying they are “part of just a general pattern that we’ve seen would be considered ridiculous if it weren’t so sad.” The president added that Huckabee was making an “effort to push Mr. Trump out of the headlines,” referring to another Republican candidate, Donald Trump.

The Anti-Defamation League’s national director, Jonathan Greenblatt, called Huckabee’s comments “completely out of line and unacceptable.”

“To hear Mr. Huckabee invoke the Holocaust when America is Israel’s greatest ally and when Israel is a strong nation capable of defending itself is disheartening,” Greenblatt said. “The great tragedy of the Holocaust saw the Jews of Europe without allies and without power at the worst possible moment.”

The Democratic National Committee took issue with what it called Huckabee’s “cavalier” analogy to the Holocaust, saying such rhetoric “has no place in American politics.” Its chair, U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, in a statement issued Sunday called on Huckabee to apologize to the Jewish community and the American people.

Huckabee tweets that Obama is marching Israelis ‘to the door of the oven’ Read More »

When American Jews do not believe that Israel ‘sincerely’ wants peace

Here is a short yet important story in one graph:

Two years ago, the Pew Research Center asked the Jews of America a question: Do you think the current Israeli government is making a sincere effort to bring about a peace settlement with the Palestinians? The Jews had an answer, and not a positive one: 

“About four-in-10 American Jews (38 percent) think the current Israeli government is making a sincere effort to bring about a peace settlement with the Palestinians, while 48 percent say this is not the case.”

The survey had more details pertaining to this question: “Jews of no religion” were considerably more skeptical of Israel’s effort than Jews by religion. Orthodox Jews had more confidence in Israel, and 61 percent of them thought the Israeli government is making a sincere effort to bring about peace. Just more than half of Conservative Jews (52 percent) thought likewise, but only 36 percent of Reform Jews had the same view.

Earlier this month, when Jewish People Policy Institute (JPPI) published the study my colleague Israel Defense Forces Brig. Gen. (Ret.) Mike Herzog and I authored, “Jewish Values and Israel’s Use of Force in Armed Conflict,” you could find the same question. Although our survey was not a scientific poll of the Jewish community (it was a short questionnaire that participants in the Jerusalem think tank’s dialogue were asked to answer), we wanted to test the same question and see how different the answer would be among the participants of JPPI discussions. Generally speaking, this is a group of much more connected Jews — almost all of our discussants visited Israel — and we wanted to see how responses might vary from the answer given by the general Jewish population sampled by Pew.

The result was somewhat surprising. The Pew poll and the JPPI survey provided a very similar result. That is to say: Even among the more connected Jews who take part in the JPPI process, confidence in Israel’s sincerity is eroding.

Enter Steven Cohen, a research professor at Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, who also asked the same question, in the same words, in the Jewish Journal’s recent survey. The Journal’s poll focused on Iran, but it included other questions as well. And thus, it gives us an opportunity to compare not two but three occasions in which the same question was asked of American Jews. Note that it was asked at different times, and with different governments in power. Note that the change in time and context does not much matter. 

Israel has a problem.

It has a problem not because it does not want peace. In fact, I think the perception of American Jews is wrong. But this does not much matter. Israel has a problem because it fails to present a case strong enough to convince other Jews that it wants peace. And as I wrote in the JPPI study, when Israel is not seen as making a sincere effort to have peace, it affects the way Jews think about Israel in other areas as well.

Specifically, in our study we found such an effect when we cross-referenced the responses to this question (of sincerity) with participants’ levels of agreement with two other survey statements: “In general, Israel uses military force only as a last resort,” and “Israel’s military did as much as possible to avoid civilian casualties in last summer’s armed conflict in Gaza.”

The bottom line is as simple as it is troubling. Those who feel that “the current Israeli government is making a sincere effort to bring about a peace settlement with the Palestinians” agree with the other statements far more than those who feel differently. In other words: When Israel cannot convince the Jews that it wants peace, it has a harder time convincing them that it attempts to act morally while at war. 

When American Jews do not believe that Israel ‘sincerely’ wants peace Read More »