fbpx

April 25, 2014

Living in the shadows – the story of the Holocaust’s “Hidden Children”

When remembering the horrors of the Holocaust, one can’t avoid thinking about the kids. Jewish children who lived in Europe during the Third Reich were forced into a grown-up perspective on life and skipped the innocence of the childhood. They did not laugh, they did not play, they did not see colors or enjoyed nature. Their youthfulness became in handy when needing to hide from the Nazis. While many did not understand the seriousness of their every action, they found themselves spending months and even years in basements, tunnels, sewages, and sometimes while living in plain sight but under false identity. 

By hiding, some of them managed to escape the increasing persecution and, most importantly, the deportations. The most famous story of a “hidden child” is the story of Anne Frank, but every child in hiding carries a special story with him or her.

A couple of days before Israel’s national Holocaust Day (mentioned this upcoming Monday,) I bring you the story of Tsvi Nadav-Rosler, a 76 year old Holocaust survivor, who told me his tale of survival as a “hidden child.” “I haven’t told my story of survival for many years. I, as other “hidden children,” felt uncomfortable in comparison to those who’ve been through much worse experience or those who didn’t survive at all. But now I tell it, because there are not many left who can tell the stories of that dark time,” he says to me before he begins his journey back in time. “When I tell my story, there is a double message I want to get through: first, is the monstrosity and the almost unbelievable evilness of the Nazis. The second is the nobility of those who helped us hide. They were the proof that not all is lost in humanity.  They knew the dangers of helping us and still saved us from death.”

 

Tsvi was hidden in a small village called Arbre in Belgium between the years 1942-1945, with his mother and sister. A series of paintings he made of his childhood memories was recently presented in Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial museum in Israel, and in Arbre, where he bravely returned last year.

 

“We were a middle-class Jewish and Zionist family and we lived in a city named Antwerp, my father, my mother, my sister and me. My father was a coal merchant, who lived in Israel for a while as part of a group of Zionists, and returned to Belgium in 1929 because of financial difficulties. When the war broke out and the Germans were approaching Belgium in 1940, we packed our things and escaped to France. As it turned out, the Germans have already beaten us there. They caught us, alongside hundreds of other Jewish refugees from Belgium, and told us to return home. We did as we were told and continued living our life.

Soon, the Germans took over Belgium and slowly started initiating more and more strange rules upon the Jewish community. First was the yellow badge, then a prohibition on owning businesses, then prohibition on owning a radio, curfew, and more. Those rules began to bring us down, but my father was an optimist and did not worry. Afterward, they started requiring people to “work camps.” My father had a saying “working does not kill you,” and he was preparing to go, even volunteer.

My mother warned him from Hitler and his plans, she had a sense for danger, but he answered that Hitler’s statements are simply part of his propaganda and that he does not really mean to wipe out all the Jews. My mother did not listen to him and took the threat very seriously. She went to a Belgian doctor, who was not allowed to treat Jews at the time, and managed to set up a certificate that says that my sister and I are ill with a contagious disease. Then, she went to a prostitute who lived by the port and asked her to take care of us if and when a necessity would arise.

One night, on August 24th, 1942, Belgian officers came knocking on our door in the middle of the night, telling us we have ten minutes to pack our things and come with them. My father started packing, but my mother started this dramatic act, telling them that my sister and I were sick and can’t come and that she must stay and take care of us. The chief officer was touched by her act, and whispered in her ear that we must run immediately, because in about 15 minutes more officers will come. My father went with them, because they couldn’t return empty handed. My mother brought us to the prostitute by the port and went hiding in the house of non-Jewish Belgium teacher who was a part of the underground resistance.

Right by the port was the tram what took all the “workers.” That was the last time I saw my father, my friends and my neighbors. I was five years old and asked my mother why I can’t join them. She said that I’m sick and I have a certificate that shows is, so I can’t be with them.

My 12 years old sister and I were groomed and well fed, and suddenly our lifestyle changed. The prostitute fed us with really bad food. German officers surrounded us, but our Belgium appearance and false identity of the prostitute’s niece and nephew cleared us from suspicion. One day, the prostitute’s husband, who worked in Germany, returned home and told her that hiding us is insane. She let us go and with the help of the resistance, we joined our mother at the teacher’s house. The problem was that there was no room for three there. My mother’s sister was hiding with her family in a small village in southern Belgium. My mother managed to connect her and, with the help of the resistance, sent us there. The journey there involved a train ride, where we could have been exposed, but no one checked us. After we got there, my mother, who had a more “Jewish” appearance, joined us.

The resistance told my mother that staying with her sister’s family looks too suspicious and can be dangerous for all of us, so they found a new place for us in a small town called Dinant. We stayed with a nice family with a dog and really enjoyed our life there, but one day a woman approached my mother on the street and told her “I know who you are – just you wait.” My mother returned home and in an hour we were gone. Sent to a new place – Arbre.

In Arbre, a small village, we stayed with the head of the council’s sister and her family. The head of the council was a member of the underground Belgium resistance and so were the local priest and the village’s teacher. Those three were the ones who saved us. It was very risky, letting us stay, because people talked and there was gossiping. If we were exposed, we, together with those who helped us, would have been killed or sent to a concentration camp. The plan was for my sister and me to blend in – go to school, volunteer at church. My mother stayed in the house most of the time, because of her Jewish appearance.

 15 kilometers from the village there was a SS headquarter, but they never entered the village. However, as I said, people talked and we were always at risk of exposure. One family there were collaborators with the Nazis, but the resistance threatened them before they got an opportunity to open their mouth. They kept quiet and we stayed safe. 

I lived a beautiful life there. The food was good, I enjoyed nature, but my mother was always afraid because we were standing on the edge of a volcano about to explode. I was very young and did not realize the danger, but I played the game – a Christian boy that goes to church. We received false identities of an actual family that died in a car accident a while back, and told that our father volunteers in Germany. From time to time, the Germans arrived for a “scan.” The resistance warned us and we ran to the forest and hide. Now and again, when my mother thought she heard the sound of a vehicle approaching, she would take us to the attic to hide there.

In 1945, the village was liberated by the Americans. One day, a line of fancy cars marched inside, and it looked like a Hollywood film. I ran to the attic and found a Belgian flag, that was illegal to wave under the domination of the Nazis. I climbed on one of the vehicles and waved it with pride. After the liberation, my mother and I passed by a statue of the Virgin Mary. I told my mother “look, they believe in statues.” In spite of my young age, I realized that I was playing a role, and that I am not a real Christian, but a Jew.

After the war, some Jewish American soldiers threw a Hanukkah party at a large city called Namur. That was the first expression of my Jewish identity since the war erupted. We then returned to Antwerp, my mother, my sister and I, and started adjusting to life without my father and with virtually no money. I later moved to Amsterdam where I met my wife, a survivor of the Bergen Belsen concentration camp. We married in 1959 and that very same day moved to Israel. My mother and sister joined us years later.

We were very lucky. Lucky that many Belgians hated the Germans and saved 20,000 Jews from the 60,000 that lived in Belgium before the war began. Out of those 20,000, 3,000 were children. They took a huge risk in order to save us. We were lucky to have a mother that fought like a tiger and was smart enough to understand the danger and get us the sickness certificates. We were lucky that the doctor agreed to help her, that the prostitute’s husband did not expose us, that the officer did not take my mother and us, that we were not exposed while riding the train. There were tenths of times where we could get caught. Any moment someone could have exposed us, but it never happened. We were lucky to survive.”

Living in the shadows – the story of the Holocaust’s “Hidden Children” Read More »

‘Hidden,’ a child’s view of the Holocaust in graphic form

There are hundreds of Holocaust-themed books for children and teenagers that are written in English. Often these books are translated into various languages, but there are fewer Holocaust books originally published in German, French, Italian, or Dutch, and much less found in other European countries that were under Nazi control during World War II. One reason for the dearth of European children’s books on the Holocaust is that these countries simply publish fewer books overall, and their children’s publishing industries are just not as robust as those in the English speaking world. This is more pronounced in countries such as Greece, Poland, or Hungary, but, in places where children’s publishers are taking a chance on innovative formats and themes, the subject is more popular.

The Netherlands and France are two countries that have endeavored to tackle their troubled histories by publishing original Holocaust-themed books for children. In 2007, a Dutch high-level comic book called The Search was printed by The Anne Frank House in Amsterdam. It is a fictional story of a Jewish woman who tells her grandson about her childhood in Nazi Germany after Hitler rose to power. Her family escapes to Holland, but later they are arrested and her parents are killed at Auschwitz. It was widely translated, even into Hebrew, and used successfully in schools to teach about the Holocaust by using the comic book format to engage young people. Controversy and hand-wringing ensued: is it ok to use comics to teach about the Holocaust? Art Speigelman’s groundbreaking 1986 comic parable, Maus, was written with an adult audience in mind, and this had not yet been attempted for children.

When The Search was published in Israel, Dorit Novak, the director of the International School for Holocaust Studies at Yad VaShem, was interviewed about the appropriateness of a graphic novel about the Holocaust. “It doesn't debase the subject of the Holocaust”, she said. “We must tell (the kids) everything without hiding anything, lying or deceiving, but do it in a manner that doesn't scare them.”  The Search (Die Suche) also became popular in German schools because of its format and had a “strong impact on young people”, according to an assessment written on behalf of the Ministry of the Interior of North Rhine-Westphalia, which stated that “comics grab the reader’s attention.”

In 2010, the Anne Frank House published the excellent Anne Frank: The Anne Frank House Authorized Biography by comic book masters Sid Jacobsen and Ernie Colon. Reviews were universally positive and the book was considered an important addition to the literature on Anne Frank in a format that would draw in new readers. That same year a graphic novel for teens entitled, Resistance by Carla Jablonski and illustrated by Leland Purvis, was published by First-Second Books. It was the first of a trilogy about three children from a village in France who join the resistance during World War II. It won a Sydney Taylor Honor award from the Association of Jewish Libraries. Other graphic novels followed these as the market for this type of teen literature has grown more lucrative for publishers of young adult literature.

Until now, these graphic novels were all written with a teen audience in mind. This year, First-Second publishers aimed for younger readers. There are dozens of picture books dealing with the Holocaust, but this newest one, Hidden: A Child’s Story of the Holocaust, by Loic Dauvillier, Marc Lizano, and Greg Salsedo (translated from the original French, L’Enfant Cachee) may be the first to use the illustrations and dialog boxes of the graphic novel format. The publisher states that “The Holocaust is one of those complicated, sensitive moments in history that it’s difficult to find a way to discuss with young children because the complexity is so far beyond them.” The story concerns a French Jewish girl named Dounia who is so young that she dosen’t understand what is happening around her. The adult reader will have more knowledge of events as they are transpiring, such as the meaning of a scene when her father explains to the family that “Some people suggested that we become a family of sheriffs”. The earnest sepia-toned illustrations (that brighten only on the final page) convey the little girl’s pride at wearing her new yellow star, along with her utter confusion as to why she is suddenly ostracized in the school play yard.  The story is a flashback: Grandma Dounia is actually relating her own childhood to her young granddaughter, Elsa. This oft-used plot device reassures the child reader, who knows from the first pages that the protagonist of the story will eventually survive, live to old age, and have grandchildren.

Even so, this book would surely not be suitable for children under ten. As the little girl’s neighborhood starts changing day by day, reality sets in: her father loses his job, a neighbor is beaten, windows are smashed, and the Nazi soldiers arrrive. Her parents hide her under a secret panel inside a wardrobe. This exceptionally moving scene is greatly enhanced by the graphic novel format. An oversized spread of a cramped and frightened little girl in her nightgown, waiting silently in a dark space until her parents will free her, creates a true emotional connection to the pages. Illustrator Marc Lizano succeeds brilliantly in conveying complex emotion with very few stokes of his pen.  Donia is found by the kindly downstairs neighbors who eventually inform her that her parents were sent to the Drancy camp outside Paris. The neighbors agree to care for her, but they are betrayed. Dounia’s name is changed and she flees with her new “mother” to find safety at a remote village farm. Her new “father” joins the resistance. When the war ends, they search together for her parents.  Present day Grandma Dounia narrates, “The hotel walls were covered with photographs. I was told they were survivors from the camps. My mom and dad had to be in one of those pictures. We looked carefully. I didn’t know what a camp was…and no one would explain it to me. They weren’t being mean. They wanted to protect me. With my little girl’s eyes, I could see it was something unbelievably cruel. “The haunting drawing of young Dounia’s first sight of her unrecognizable mother is stylized (enlarged head, vacant eyes), but entirely effective at creating the shock and discomfort experienced by a child.

As Grandma Dounia relates the last of her difficult memories, including the fact that she never found her father, her young granddaughter has fallen asleep. Our point of view is like a video camera: we follow Dounia as she carries the child back to her room and our eyes catch the off-center portion of the item they pass in the hallway. We gently turn the page to find a  small but bittersweet photo of Dounia’s smiling, intact family as they were before the war.

Should this be the end of the story? For children in 2014, it is not. There are four more pages –this time in brighter colors—as Dounia’s son gently mentions that his daughter told him “about the talk you two had last night”. Six square panels relate this tense scene as we grow to realize that Donia has never been able to discuss the war with her own son until this day. The talented illustrator again conveys the emotion by dabbing a few extra lines across the face. Little black semi circles express downward glances and eye avoidance as they blow into their coffee cups. A close-up of a tearful Dounia  that is split into three wordless panels is full of feeling. “I just wanted to let you know that I’m very happy and very proud that you told her”, says Dounia’s son, and the last, now colorful image of he, his daughter, and mother embracing recalls the black and white photograph of long ago.

This beautiful, heartfelt book will touch all who have the privilege of reading it. The talented trio of writer, illustrator and colorist, along with translator Alexis Siegel deserve kudos for tackling this subject in graphic novel format with such power and grace.


Lisa Silverman is library director at Sinai Temple.

‘Hidden,’ a child’s view of the Holocaust in graphic form Read More »

Kick Off Party for Pacific Electric Worker-Owned, LLC!

Kick Off Party for Pacific Electric Worker-Owned, LLC!

TONIGHT!
APRIL 25th
Los Angeles, CA
 

~~
I was able to get Co-Founder of Pacific Electric Worker-Owned, LLC (PEWO), Somerset Waters, to take a moment out of his very busy schedule to discuss more about PEWO.
Check out the exclusive interview below!

~~
Q: Is there anything you would like to share about why people should think of “>LA Worcs Incubator, and a recipient of a start-up loan from the “>Micheltorena School & Community Garden and are volunteer installing the electrical for the new As profit-sharing members, they benefit directly from the success of our jobs. We all look out for losses in efficiency and since we pay a living wage, we retain more workers, enjoy a higher quality of life, a better safety record, and our consistency and our clients can feel secure and good about this.

We provide:

-conventional as well as stand-alone solar installations
-custom electric car EVSE (car chargers)
-elegant electrical solutions for residential and commercial projects
-neon and LED architectural and sculptural accents with experience in unique color mash-ups
-low voltage and communication wiring with interest in back-up communications wiring through short-wave transmitters and receivers
-and towards the 4th quarter of this year we're hoping to do some sculptural solar installations with our partner the
“>United Bicycle Institute for bike mechanics, so this along with our electrical expertise, makes us a logical entity to work on electric bikes and related projects.

We are currently ramping up an electric trike project to include solar charging, a large tool enclosure, turn & brake signals, and an electric motor.


you can find us @:
“>@WorkerOwnedLA
website: “>VIEW EVENT + RSVP**

Kick Off Party for Pacific Electric Worker-Owned, LLC! Read More »

Rosner’s Torah-Talk: Parashat Kedoshim with Rabbi Matthew Soffer

Our guest this week is Rabbi Matthew Soffer, assistant rabbi at Temple Israel in Boston & director of the Riverway project. Rabbi Soffer worked as an Eisendrath Legislative Assistant Fellow at the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism in Washington, DC, and from 2003-2005 he worked for the Union for Reform Judaism, as the advisor to the Executive Board of the North American Federation of Temple Youth (NFTY).  During his years at the Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion (HUC-JIR), Matt was a Bonnie and Daniel Tisch Rabbinical Fellow, A Kavod Tzedakah Fellow, and he served as Revson Rabbinical Fellow at Congregation Beth Elohim in Brooklyn, NY, where he coordinated social justice activities and organized Brooklyn Jews, the 20s and 30s project of the congregation. After his ordination in May 2010, he joined the Temple Israel community as an assistant Rabbi and the Director of the Riverway Project.

 
This Week’s Torah Portion– Parashat Kedoshim (Leviticus 19:1- 20:27)- features God telling Moses to give the people of Israel a set of rules which are meant to help them live a life of holiness. These rules include variations on several of the ten commanments, as well as different laws concerning basic ethical behavior (prohibitions on cheating, stealing and false oaths), harvest, religious rituals, and sexual conduct. Our discussion focuses, among other things, on the idea of “commanding love” and on whether that’s even possible.

 
If you would like to learn some more about parashat Kedoshim, check out our very first Torah-Talk with Rabbi Rick Jacobs.

 

 

 

Rosner’s Torah-Talk: Parashat Kedoshim with Rabbi Matthew Soffer Read More »

Does the Command to “Love Our Fellows” Include “Loving Our Enemies Too?”

In this week’s Torah portion Kedoshim a verse appears in the very center of the portion that Rabbi Akiva called “Klal gadol baTorah a great rule of the Torah.”

The verse is among the most famous in the Bible, and I believe among the most misunderstood – “V’ahavta l’reiacha kamochaYou shall love your fellow/neighbor as yourself….” (Leviticus 19:18)

There are at least three questions this verse raises. The first is how a human being can be commanded to feel love?

Actually, we can’t, which means that the mitzvah to “love” must be understood as involving something other than feelings.

The spiritual teacher David Steindl-Rast writes that there’s one thing that characterizes “love” in all its forms – erotic, romantic, familial, tribal, national, spiritual, religious, even love we feel for our pets – and it is found in our yearning to belong to and be connected with something greater than ourselves.

“Love,” he says “is a wholehearted [and willful] ‘yes’ to belonging” (Essential Writings, p. 73) with all the implications that attachment to, responsibility for and accountability with others bring.

Our yearning to belong opens us to greater understanding of who we really are and what our role is in the world. That yearning links us heart to heart with others, with creatures large and small, with nature, the universe, the cosmos, and God.

Jewish mystics have taught for centuries a central truth, just as scientists today have concluded, that we are physically and spiritually part of a vast Oneness. We share common origins and a common destiny with each other, with every people and nation, and because of this we’re responsible for one another and accountable for how we behave with friend, foe and stranger alike.

Too often our idea of “self” as suggested in “You shall love your fellow as yourself,” is limited to our little egos. If that verse, however, is to mean something, then we need to think about “love” differently; not as a feeling alone, but as an attitude of the heart.

V’ahavta understood this way enables us to fulfill the commandment because our response is not based in a feeling but as an act of will that we exercise when we take responsibility for others because we belong to each other as part of the great Oneness of humankind.

What does it mean then to “love” someone as we love ourselves?

Rambam taught that if it’s ever a toss-up between saving our own lives and saving another, we’re obligated to save our own lives first.

Ramban (a century later) interprets the mitzvah as meaning that what we wish for ourselves we must also wish for others whether we know them or not.

The third question is perhaps the most challenging. Does this commandment call upon us actually to “love” our enemies in some way?

No. Indeed, there are some people we cannot wish well as we wish for ourselves because their deeds have been too heinous to tolerate or forgive.

That being said, I’ll never forget a speech delivered nearly thirty-six years ago on the White House lawn by Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin on the occasion of the signing of the Camp David Peace Accords with Egypt.

Begin told the world that day that the Jewish people considers it amongst the greatest of mitzvot to make of a “ra” ( an “evil” person –an enemy) into a “rea” (“a fellow” – a friend).

Though Egypt and Israel are hardly “friends” as we understand friendship between nations, it’s a fact that since that day, September 17, 1978, there has not been one day of war between Israel and Egypt.

There are many examples in which enemies have been transformed into “fellows” by sincere t’shuvah (penitence) and s’lichah (forgiveness) on the part of one or both parties.

Though Judaism doesn’t command us to “love” our enemies, tradition does require us to give a penitent person a chance at reconciliation.

As a people we’re only required to act ethically towards our enemies thereby leaving open the possibility of transformation should circumstances warrant it (see Exodus 23:4).

This week negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians verge on derailment, but we need to remember that once Germany was the Jewish people’s greatest enemy and today Germany is the least anti-Semitic country in Europe.

Germany and Japan were bitter foes of America seventy years ago, and Protestants and Catholics in Northern Ireland were killing each other. Today, these former enemies have laid down their guns and established peace.

My Israeli friend, Yaron Shavit, likes to say – “B’Yisrael ye-ush lo optsia! – In Israel, despair is not an option!”

That is an important attitude to remember as we keep open our hearts that we may now or in the future fulfill the mitzvah “V’ahavta l’reiacha kamocha!

Shabbat shalom!

Does the Command to “Love Our Fellows” Include “Loving Our Enemies Too?” Read More »

Obama: It may be time for a peace process ‘pause’

President Obama said it may be time for a pause in Middle East peacemaking in the wake of a breakdown in Israel-Palestinian talks.

“There may come a point at which there just needs to be a pause, and both sides need to look at the alternatives,” Obama was quoted by Reuters as saying Friday in Seoul, his current stop in an Asia tour.

“What we haven’t seen is frankly the political will to make tough decisions, frankly, and that’s been true on both sides,” he said.

The crisis began March 29, when Israel failed to meet a deadline to release the final 26 of 104 Palestinian prisoners it had pledged to release at the outset of renewed talks last July. It escalated within days when the Palestinians violated their own pledge not to apply to join international agreements while talks were underway.

The crisis deepened on Wednesday when the Palestinian Authority signed a unity agreement with Hamas, the group controlling the Gaza Strip that has been designated as terrorist by Israel, the United States and the European Union. Israel suspended the talks formally on Thursday.

Palestinian Authority officials said they would demand Hamas accept the two-state solution as a condition to reconciliation between Ramallah and the Islamist group ruling Gaza.

An unnamed senior Palestinian official on Friday told The Times of Israel that Abbas’ Fatah movement  “won’t agree to complete the reconciliation process” unless Hamas agrees to a new government that “accepts the two-state solution — Israel and Palestine — along the 1967 lines.” The new government must also “adhere to the conditions of the Middle East Quartet: recognize Israel, ratify all signed agreements and renounce violence,” he said.

The official told The Times of Israel that a Palestinian unity government would be established only after Hamas and Fatah, the ruling power in the Palestinian Authority-controlled West Bank, agreed to a date for elections to the P.A. presidency and parliament.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on Thursday urged Israel and the Palestinians to make the compromises needed to forge ahead with peace talks, although he admitted that the negotiations had reached “a difficult point.”

Sheikh Hassan Yousef, a Hamas founder who remains a prominent figure in the West Bank, told  The Times of Israel on Thursday that reconciliation with Fatah ”will serve everyone: the Palestinians and even the peace process.”

The United Nations’ peace envoy, Robert Serry, maintained that reconciliation was “the only way to reunite the West Bank and Gaza under one legitimate Palestinian Authority,” the statement said.

The European Union also hailed the deal, but maintained that the extension of peace talks beyond the April 29 deadline must remain “the top priority.”

But European Jewish Congress President Moshe Kantor called on the European Union to abide by its own guidelines, which designate Hamas as a terrorist organization and shun any Palestinian government in which it participates. Kantor and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu discussed the issue Thursday in Israel, where the Congress’ executive met this week.

Earlier Thursday, Netanyahu’s security cabinet “decided unanimously that it will not negotiate with a Palestinian government that incorporates Hamas, a terrorist organization that seeks the destruction of Israel.”

Obama: It may be time for a peace process ‘pause’ Read More »

‘Agitated and angry’: White supremacists still a danger, experts say

The recent shootings at a pair of Kansas City-area Jewish facilities illustrate the persistent threat of white supremacist violence, even as broad measures of anti-Semitism continue to decline.

Suspected gunman Frazier Glenn Miller, Jr. had a long history in the white supremacist movement, dating back to the 1970s, before the recent rampage that killed three people outside the Jewish Community Center of Greater Kansas City and the nearby Village Shalom assisted living facility.

Though police believe that Miller acted alone, analysts who track white supremacist groups say that the movement has become more active in recent years, which they attribute to factors such as economic woes and the backlash against Barack Obama’s election in 2008.

“They did get much more agitated and angry, and we did see an increase in criminal activity, in violent hate crimes, acts of terrorism, plots coming out of the white supremacist movement,” said Mark Pitcavage, the Anti-Defamation League’s director of investigative research.

However, Pitcavage said, the white supremacist movement has not seen significant growth in its ranks.

Behavioral patterns among hate groups are notoriously difficult to track, as members tend to be secretive and deeply suspicious of outsiders. Most adherents to extremist causes don’t affiliate with any group at all. The landscape has become even more complex as many established white supremacist groups have collapsed into a myriad of splinter groups.

Miller’s own career illustrates the fluid world of white supremacist groups. A former U.S. Army Green Beret, Miller joined a neo-Nazi group in the late 1970s, then founded the Carolina Knights of the Ku Klux Klan in 1980, later renamed the White Patriot Party. He became a pariah in white supremacist circles after testifying against fellow movement leaders as part of a plea bargain in a 1988 federal sedition trial but then reemerged as a prominent voice around 2000, making various media appearances, including on Howard Stern’s radio show.

While far-right anti-government groups in general have experienced explosive growth over the past few years, white supremacist groups do not appear to have had a similar surge in their ranks. But that doesn’t mean the threat they pose has diminished, experts say.

“The members nowadays tend to be more dangerous — they’re more likely to commit very serious hate crimes against Jews and other groups,” said Jack Levin, a professor of sociology and criminology at Northeastern University. “The peripheral members have gotten out. The hardcore survivors are the ones who commit the really serious crimes, and they’re the ones who are left in the groups.”

At the same time, anti-Semitism has become increasingly central to the ideologies of hate groups over the decades.

“We have a radical right underworld that is very much animated by anti-Semitism,” said Mark Potok, a senior fellow at the Southern Poverty Law Center. “It’s essentially been Nazified in last 30 years. They no longer see blacks as the ultimate enemy. Jews are now considered the ultimate enemy.”

That worldview, in which white supremacists see Jews as the manipulators behind blacks, Hispanics and other perceived enemies, was reflected in Miller’s own thinking.

“Blacks, they have little power except what the Jews allow them to have,” Miller said to the liberal blog Talking Points Memo in a 2012 interview. “Jews call the shots. But white people, we have no power at all.”

That increased suspicion has not necessarily translated into more anti-Semitic activity. The Anti-Defamation League found that reported anti-Semitic incidents were down in 2013, continuing a decade-long trend.

White supremacists can sometimes find it difficult to identify Jews, even when they seek them out.

“Look at this case outside of Kansas City,” said Levin, referring to the recent shootings. “The perpetrator tried to kill Jews and mistakenly killed three Christians.”

‘Agitated and angry’: White supremacists still a danger, experts say Read More »

Palestinian Authority PM offers to quit, easing way for unity government

Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Rami Hamdallah offered his resignation on Friday, the official news agency WAFA said, a move which may pave the way a unity government agreed between P.A. President Mahmoud Abbas and Hamas.

Israel on Thursday suspended peace talks with the Palestinians, saying it could not negotiate with an administration that embraces a militant group sworn to Israel's destruction.

Reporting By Noah Browning, Editing by Ori Lewis and Angus MacSwan

Palestinian Authority PM offers to quit, easing way for unity government Read More »

Chosenness, Again: Haftarat Kedoshim – Amos 9:7-15

It just smacks you in the face.

There it is, in the very first line of Haftarat Kedoshim: “To Me, O Israelites, you are just like the Ethiopians.” (This is the Ashkenazic Haftarah: the Sephardic version, Ezekiel 20: 2-20, I will consider in future iterations).

It couldn’t get any clearer than that, could it? If you are looking for a strong, simple, transparent condemnation of racial prejudice, you couldn’t do any better, right?

Well, of course you could, because the Torah has 70 faces. More to the point, as George Orwell put it, “to see what is in front of one’s nose is a constant struggle.” Rabbi JH Hertz, whose commentary I suffered through as a kid, said, “Degenerate Israel is no more to God than the despised inhabitants of distant Ethiopia, the descendants of Ham.” 

The context lends some support to Hertz’ position (although less than he claims). After all, the passage is spoken by a  God enraged at Israel, one that will soon be conquered and dispersed.

But when it comes to Tanach, interpretation need not follow context. Indeed, the rabbis developed an extraordinarily powerful hermeneutic of decontextualization. Consider, for example, the Biblical injunction of “life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise”. (Exodus 21:23-25). You really cannot get any clearer than this, but the rabbis hated it.

In a famous Talmudic discussion, they did interpretive somersaults to avoid plain and precise Biblical language. They noticed that in the Exodus passage, “for” – as in “eye for eye” used the Hebrew preposition tachat. Because another Biblical passage completely and totally unrelated to the issue used the preposition “tachat” to refer to the payment of damages ((Deuteronomy 22:29), the rabbis agreed that “ayin tachat ayin” – even though it is about as clear as can be – really means that if you knock someone’s eye out, you pay damages for it, instead of having your own eye knocked out. (Bava Kamma 83b-84a).

Compared to that, to argue that “Israelites, you are just like the Ethiopians” entails a rejection of racial prejudice is pretty much of a gimme.  We really need look no further than Moses, who married a Cushite woman. Far from expressing disapproval of the marriage, the Torah relates that when Miriam and Aaron denigrated it, they were afflicted with skin disease. (Numbers 12:1-16).

But if you want context, you can have it. Right after comparing Israelites to Ethiopians, God says, “True, I brought Israel up from the land of Egypt, but also the Philistines from Caphtor and the Arameans from Kir.” Even the foundational story of the Israelites cannot be seen as unique. There’s another smack in the face.

These divine stings are so arresting in no small part because they undermine other texts read alongside the Haftarah. In this week’s Parasha, God insists, “you shall be holy to Me, for I the Lord am holy, and I have set you apart from other peoples to be Mine.” (Leviticus 20:26). And no; this isn’t just a split between Chumash and Nevi’im. Just a few chapters early in Amos itself, God declares to Israel, “only you have I known of all the families of the earth; that is why I will call you to account for all your iniquities.” (3:2).

One could always ascribe these contradictions to God’s ongoing psychic crisis, which I have written about before. But that is too easy, for God’s statements really reflect commonplace facts and sentiments.  Every human being is unique, and every human being is equal. Parents with multiple children have a special relationship with each, yet do not view one as better than the other (at least good ones don’t).

On chosenness, Jewish scholars have dug themselves into holes that have only made the problem worse.  Consider Emet v-Emunah, the Conservative Jewish statement of faith, which argues, “Far from being a license for special privilege, it entailed additional responsibilities not only toward God but to our fellow human beings.” Joseph Telushkin echoes this sentiment in his book Jewish Literacy. But I doubt that it helps. If God gives one people special responsibilities, then this may not imply special privilege, but it does imply privileged status. Consider God as Parent: one gives a child greater responsibilities if one believes the child can handle them. If God gives one people greater responsibilities than others, then this implies that the Divine Mind believes that particular people to be particularly capable. And that implies a higher status.

The former chief rabbi of the United Kingdom, Lord Immanuel Jakobovits, tried to avoid this problem by arguing that different peoples had different missions: the Greeks had philosophy, the Romans law and government, the British parliamentarism, the Americans democracy, and so on. What about the Jews? “The Jews,” said Lord Jakobovits, “were chosen by God to be 'peculiar unto Me' as the pioneers of religion and morality; that was and is their national purpose.”

Wrong. Were I a member of any other faith, I would find this insulting: it suggests that the Jews have a unique call to “religion and morality.” We don’t.

Instead, we should say that Jews are chosen and so is every other people and faith, to the extent that these peoples and faiths are struggling to understand and enter into relationship with the divine. God “chooses” a people, or a faith, when they are actively seeking to find God. Judaism is special, and chosen, because it attempts to find God in its special way – and Tibetan Buddhism is special and chosen when it does the same even if it is an atheist religion. (The Dalai Lama reminded Rabbi Zalman Schachter-Shalomi, “remember that I am an atheist.” Reb Zalman responded, “No worries – so is God.” This.). Why be Jewish? Because God calls your soul to be Jewish. That is all.

It is the sincere and urgent search, and craving, and listening for the divine that makes a people or an individual chosen. After all, spiritual longing is not a choice – it is a gift. And that gift can come to an Ethiopian, or a Philistine, or an Aramean, or a Christian, or a Muslim, or a Buddhist. In this sense, all humanity can be Israel, whether they be Jewish or not, for all humanity can struggle with God.

Chosenness, Again: Haftarat Kedoshim – Amos 9:7-15 Read More »

Marcel Janco’s Art and Life

When you think of Jewish art the first thing that comes to mind is innovation. Daring, beautiful, undeniably avant-garde, and of course fashionably liberal, the truth is that it makes for great party conversation. If you ever do find yourself in that position, do not forget to mention the often forgotten Marcel Janco, whose work pushed the boundaries of artistic culture and society to its limits.

The fact that there is a museum in Tel Aviv that commemorates his lavish pieces is not enough of a testament not only to his work, but the man himself. Why is this? He was one of the first artists to break through social conventions and take part in the formation of what could be called “real” modern art in Israel- surprisingly not with the purpose of provoking but to inspire.

Janco, born into a Jewish family in Bucharest, was educated by modest means in the practice of what we would consider traditional artistry. In his youth he had the luck to travel throughout Europe which later modelled his theories on modernism, not only within the confines of artistic development but also life itself.

He returned to Bucharest in in his early 20’s to work as a graphic designer for a small and modern art newspaper called “Simbolul” where he met the famous Tristan Tzara. Together they went on to form the head-cracking theories of predisposed nihilism and apathy within the field of art. These theories, or better said mind-numbing ideas, were the launching pad from where the DADA movement later sprang out in Switzerland with the help of many other artists, both of Jewish and non-Jewish backgrounds.

So what is my point?

The Ein Hod colony was a conglomeration of Jewish artists that really believed in the social-realist conception of art within the context of modernism, which eventually became Israeli abstractionism. What do all of these terms actually mean? That fancy conceptual art became more about Israel and mostly geared towards pro-Zionist ideology. But what did Marcel Janco want to accomplish through the Ein Hod colony?

It is likely he just wanted to find a peaceful place where he could paint, away from the bustling and dirty urban life of Tel Aviv. Yet, I believe he was trying to create a society in which Jewish artists would be free to express themselves as they wished, away from the discriminations of old Europe, and frankly the world as a whole. Whatever the case, the colony’s peace was at times disturbed by Palestinians claiming ownership of the land they had only turned into a mess and abandoned a few years prior to when Janco founded the colony. To this day Ein Hod is still a communal settlement with a population of around 550, where most of the settlers are somehow involved in art-making.

Janco’s legacy is definitely more than just a few interesting paintings to stare at and pretend you are an intellectual. He had an immense role to play in the formation of Israeli art, and I would go as far to say in culture as well.

The study of Jewish and Israeli art is increasingly becoming dim in the Western world, which in itself should be a reason to worry. Marcel Janco, although nowhere nearly at the artistic height of those such as Marc Chagall, not only played an important role in setting up of a historic art movement, but also had a hand in the creation, or better said consolidation of Israeli culture in its early days.

As the times were becoming increasingly grim for Jews in Europe, Janco left for Eretz Yisrael only to completely start over . In interviews he had claimed that although he had never considered himself a “Jewish artist”, he was without a doubt “an artist who was a Jew”, ultimately alluding to his own relationship to his ancestry.

In Eretz Yisrael he immediately became a part of the art scene that was taking roots in Tel Aviv, only to become a full fledged member of the famous Ofakim Hadashim-New Horizons movement which was an evident continuation of the modernist and post-modernist ideals that were born in Europe. Yet, with each passing year it put out works that were becoming increasingly Israeli, not only in form but in cultural definition as well.

After Israel became a reality post-1948, Janco, most likely bored with the then current state of art in Israel went ahead and founded a pseudo-socialist, utopian art colony in Ein Hod, where interestingly he became its unofficial leader. You are probably wondering if it was like a kibbutz with paint brushes? The answer is yes and no.

Marcel Janco’s Art and Life Read More »