fbpx

April 17, 2014

Calendar April 19-25

SAT | APR 19

WENDY WALDMAN

Maybe it’s Coachella, or maybe it’s spring air — but we’ve got a musical week in store for you. Remember Bryndle? One of the 1960s folk-rock bands’ original members is performing tonight. With a long and diverse career, Waldman has written and recorded many of her own albums but has also greatly contributed to the repertoire of other artists such as Linda Ronstadt, Vanessa Williams and Aaron Neville. Winner of the Wrangler Award from the Cowboy Hall of Fame, Waldman will be sharing the stage with pianist and guitarist Steve Ferguson. Sat. 8 p.m. $15. Boulevard Music, 4316 Sepulveda Blvd., Culver City. (310) 398-2583. SUN | APR 20

BUGS BUNNY

Here’s an opportunity to hang with Mel Blanc, or at least his voice. The afternoon will be a celebration of our favorite wabbit in some classic Warner Bros. cartoon shorts. Whether he is cleverly escaping the grasp of an eager huntsman, causing a bit of mischief aimed at a certain duck or conducting classical music, our cute and fluffy friend will be having a ball. Sun. 4 p.m. $11 (general), $9 (students and seniors), $7 (members). Aero Theatre, 1328 Montana Ave., Santa Monica. (323) 466-3456. MON | APR 21

HAROLD RAMIS TRIBUTE

Celebrate the life and career of the late and great writer, director and actor. Wearing various hats for various films, he helped bring to life “Ghostbusters,” “Caddyshack,” “National Lampoon’s Vacation” and “Analyze This.” This particular evening, we will indulge in the film “Stripes” — a comedy in which two friends leave their humdrum lives for a bit of Army fun, and “Groundhog Day” — the beloved romantic comedy that you can watch over, and over, and over again. Sun. and Mon. Various times. $8 (general), $6 (children and seniors). New Beverly Cinema, 7165 W. Beverly Blvd., Los Angeles. (323) 938-4038. TUE | APR 22

YALA POST-PASSOVER PIZZA CRAWL

Are you missing bread? Is it painful? The Young Adults of Los Angeles are on a mission to remedy this. As Passover ends, it’s time to hop back on that floury, and in this case, cheesy and tomato-y wagon. This will also be a bit of a pub crawl, so you’ll have plenty of options, rendering you able to finally decide where the best pizza and beer in town are. Tues. 7 p.m. Location to be announced. (323) 761-8000. Please consult the YALA Foodie Cluster Facebook page. WED | APR 23

“HOW TO DIE IN OREGON”

The National Council of Jewish Women/ Los Angeles hosts a screening that could get a little controversial. Winner of the Grand Jury Prize for Documentaries at the 27th Sundance Film Festival, the movie covers Oregon’s Death With Dignity Act — an act that allows terminally ill patients to end their own lives with physician-prescribed medication. Is this an act that belongs in California? There will be a brief Q-and-A with representatives of the nonprofit Compassion and Choices, a patients’ rights group. Wed. 11:30 a.m. Free. RSVP requested. NCJW/LA, 543 N. Fairfax Ave., Los Angeles. (323) 852-8503. THU | APR 24

“LIVES OF THE GREAT PATRIOTIC WAR: THE UNTOLD STORY OF SOVIET JEWISH SOLDIERS IN THE RED ARMY DURING WORLD WAR II”

Just when you think you’ve heard every story out of World War II, the USC Shoah Foundation and the Blavatnik Archive Foundation team up to reveal just how wrong you are. Learn about the 500,000 Jewish soldiers who fought in the Soviet Armed Forces against Nazi Germany. The exhibit’s interactive digital displays include diary and letter excerpts, reproductions of archival photographs and documents, and oral testimonies. At tonight’s opening reception, you can also hear from a panel of esteemed academics. Thu. 4 p.m. Free. RSVP requested. Runs for two months. USC Doheny Memorial Library, 3550 Trousdale Parkway, Los Angeles. (213) 740-6001. FRI | APR 25

MARK WINKLER

With the weather heating up, it might be time for a cool-down. Thank goodness Mark Winkler and Cheryl Bentyne are bringing the “West Coast Cool” jazz scene of the 1950s to our very own LACMA stage. Winkler, a critically acclaimed and award-winning jazz vocalist/lyricist, has been smoothing his way through the music scene since the 1980s. With the Grammy-winning Bentyne, a member of Manhattan Transfer, by his side, the duo will perform Dave Brubeck, Chet Baker, Julie London, Bobby Troup and more. Fri. 6 p.m. Free. LACMA, 5905 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles. (323) 857-6010. ” target=”_blank”>sabantheatre.org

Calendar April 19-25 Read More »

Selfie Spirituality

Alan Morinis was an accomplished film producer running a large, publicly traded communications company in Canada, when, one day, his house of cards crumbled.

“I was selling too many stories,” Morinis told me when we met in a cozy corner of a Hollywood Starbucks not long ago. 

Selling too many stories might sound like an oxymoron in the entertainment business, except that Morinis got a little carried away packaging ideas without developing them. For a producer, that is selling deception.

“It’s like saying, ‘Yeah we’ve got somebody committed’ — not really committed. [Just] so it was a good package to sell.”

At 47, with a wife, two children and a mortgage to support, Morinis’ business collapsed. “There was no way I could look at that except to see that I had a lot of responsibility for that, and the result was it kinda blew me open.” 

It was a shock, he said, because he had always been used to such soaring successes. “For a guy who had been a Rhodes scholar, who had a Ph.D. from Oxford, who had taken his film company public, who had won all kinds of awards etc., etc., etc.,” Morinis recalled fondly, “all of a sudden I was flat. I had hit the wall.” 

He decided to turn — or return — to the life of the spirit, something he had pursued in his 20s when he spent three years in India. “I was going to India for the same reason everybody was going to India,” he said. “Yoga.” 

After earning a master’s degree from Oxford, he spent two years studying Iyengar yoga with its founder. He later returned for a third year, as a doctoral student, to do dissertation research on Hindi pilgrimage. “I was interested in people making journeys to God,” he said.

Even though Morinis was Jewish, he had never found any spiritual sustenance in it. He said he grew up in a “non-observant, anti-religious home,” where the closest thing his parents had to a religion was communism. “You know the term ‘red-diaper baby’?” he asked. “I grew up with a red diaper.” 

It never occurred to him that Judaism had anything to offer his seeking soul — or anyone else’s, for that matter. “Who would have thought to go to a rabbi or a synagogue?” he wondered. “You do that, and you expect to get a bagel — like the answer to your spiritual crisis is gonna be lox and cream cheese. That is not what I was looking for,” he said. 

“I was seeking deep wisdom and guidance about how to be a human being on a higher plane.”

But after his business crashed in 1997, he fell very low, and found that Judaism was there for him. “I thought, ‘Shmuck, you’ve blown it in the modern world,’ ” Morinis said of himself. “ ‘What have you got to build on? Well … you are Jewish.’ 

“It was my pintele yid,” he said. “This idea that within each Jew there’s a little seed — even though it may go 50 years and just stay dormant.”

Morinis started searching for something in the Jewish universe that would address his inner struggle. “We’re all neshamahs in special circumstances,” he joked.

He found his answer in the ancient Jewish spiritual practice known as Mussar, which emphasizes ethical behavior and the refinement of character through study and self-examination.  

Although Mussar’s roots are in medieval Jewish literature, it became a popular movement in 19th-century Eastern Europe, when Rabbi Yisroel Salanter sought to deepen Jewish connection in the face of assimilation. Though today it is well integrated into Orthodox practice, it never made it into wider streams of Judaism, since many of its most passionate practitioners were killed during the Holocaust. “It looked real, but it looked dead,” Morinis said of his first impression.

Following two years of intensive individual study, Morinis connected with Rabbi Yechiel Perr, founder of the Yeshiva of Far Rockaway, a Charedi yeshiva in Queens, N.Y., who became his teacher. “I would teach Mussar to a gentile!” Morinis declaimed, quoting Perr. 

Five years later, in 2004, Morinis created the Mussar Institute from his home in Vancouver,   British Columbia, establishing nonprofit status in both the United States and Canada. The institute exists mainly as a Web site, and offers various Mussar curricula designed for long-distance learning. There are assorted formats available, for both individuals and groups, and the institute trains local leaders to help facilitate study within communities. Several Los Angeles synagogues now have Mussar groups, and there is even a secular one at the California Institution for Women — a Corona prison 50 miles east of Los Angeles. 

Mussar is now Morinis’ full-time job, offering plenty of personalized wisdom but not exactly movie business paychecks. “We have no overhead, and we have no office,” he boasted, telling me he only pays himself $45,000 per year. “No bricks, no mortar, no plaques.” 

And that is just how he likes it, he said, because it allows the institute to focus on programming, unencumbered by demanding donors. “We’re very light,” he explained, even as he offered heavy criticism of more prosperous institutions. “I think it’s outrageous that there are people in the Jewish nonprofit world getting paid $800,000 a year to run their organizations. I think it’s corrupt. I think it’s a reason not to support their organizations.”

Despite his critique of big institutions, the Mussar Institute recently partnered with the Union for Reform Judaism to create in-house curricula for synagogues across the country. “Where’s the context in a synagogue to talk about what’s really going on with you?” Morinis asked. Before 2000, “The inner life was not on the agenda. It didn’t matter where you were — Orthodox, Conservative, Reform — the Jewish world paid no attention to what was going on inside the individual. It was so concerned with building an outside world, building institutions — assimilation had a lot to do with it — [such that] the purpose of living a Jewish life was to fit in.” 

Morinis is more interested in a personalized path toward purifying the soul. And just as the study of kabbalah enjoyed a mainstream explosion in the 1990s, the new guru of Mussar hopes to revive another old movement for the modern day. 

With its focus on individual journeys and personal middot —measures of character — it seems the perfect spirituality for the age of the selfie, as focused on the self as psychotherapy but with an eye toward a holy goal: “mastery of self interest,” Morinis said. 

He should know. “My whole entry into this was my own personal search. I didn’t mean to become a teacher. I was trying to put a life back together. It was almost about survival.”

Selfie Spirituality Read More »

Tijuana to Tefilah: Crossing from Mexico to America with Jewish children who do it every day

As I stepped out of the van into the chilly, pre-dawn Tijuana air, I could just barely make out the shadows of the pedestrians nearby, all of them stepping over puddles and street trash, walking in the same direction. 

I watched as two girls, Chaya Leibkinker, 16, and her sister, Tali, 11, grabbed their backpacks from the trunk of their SUV, quickly said goodbye to their father, Israel, then, along with their mother, Sandra, melted into the crowd approaching the Tijuana-San Ysidro pedestrian border crossing into the United States.

Every weekday, about 30,000 people cross this border into the United States, the vast majority of them Mexican citizens who work in metropolitan San Diego.

Among the crowd are seven Jewish children from Tijuana, who, five days a week, make the multihour cross-border trek to day schools in northeast San Diego so they can receive a Jewish education. There are no Jewish schools in Tijuana, and the community there can’t offer them a viable religious education. So each day, they cross northbound through U.S. Customs and Border Protection and then return southward each evening into Mexico.

It wasn’t always like this. From 1997 to 2004, Tijuana had a very small Jewish day school, run by Rabbi Mendel Polichenco, who leads the city’s only traditional Jewish synagogue, a Chabad. 

But with only about 25 students per year, the school’s small budget made it too difficult to provide a great level of education, and there was not enough demand to continue making a go of it. Plus, there was the problem of turnover; many of the children’s families immigrated to the United States as soon as they were able, Polichenco said.

Bottom line: A dollar spent on transporting children to San Diego every day goes further than a dollar spent schooling them in Tijuana.

Judaism, though, is not the only reason parents and their kids spend so much time and energy crossing the border every weekday. 

After all, throughout the United States, many observant families in small Jewish communities lacking a serious educational infrastructure supplement their children’s education by enrolling them in online classes with experts in Torah, Talmud, Hebrew and other foundational elements of a comprehensive Jewish education.

One of Sandra Leibkinker’s main motivations: She believes access to Southern California’s Jewish community could very well impact whether her daughters marry Jewish men and build  Jewish homes for their own families. 

“This is a small community,” Sandra said of Tijuana, as Tali made a face while her mom untangled the girl’s knotted locks. “I want that she will marry with a Jew.” 

For Rabbi Josef Fradkin, head of school at the Chabad Hebrew Academy in San Diego, where a handful of the Tijuana students learn, the young Mexican Jews lucky enough to obtain student visas to go to a Jewish day school in America — as opposed to a public education in Tijuana — simply have better odds of growing economically as well as religiously.

“That’s why their parents send them every morning across an international border — to give them a chance to succeed,” Fradkin said.

Sandra Leibkinker stands with daughters Tali, 11, left, and Chaya, 16, as they wait on the American side of the U.S.-Mexico border for the carpool van.

Most of these students have Secure Electronic Network for Travelers Rapid Inspection (SENTRI) cards, which allow them to cross relatively quickly while riding in the carpool van. The Leibkinker girls, however, don’t have their passes yet, so each day they cross through Customs by foot, lengthening their commute by at least 30 minutes. The girls and their mother, who accompanies them into the United States each day, meet up with the rest of their group on the other side of U.S. Customs.

My own morning started early, at 5:15 a.m. Theirs began at 5 a.m., as it does every day. To get Chaya to Torah High School of San Diego and Tali to Chabad Hebrew Academy by 8 a.m., the Leibkinkers picked me up at my Tijuana hotel, the Palacio Azteca, at 5:55 a.m. 

It was dark outside, and Carretera Federal No. 1, Tijuana’s main traffic artery, was still nearly empty — until, that is, we got close to the border, where dozens of other cars were dropping off some of the thousands of Tijuana residents crossing to work in California.

Inside Customs, the Leibkinkers and I split off into different lanes — they have a fast pass, but for pedestrian crossing only. On a normal Tuesday, crossing into San Ysidro in the standard lane often takes nearly an hour, according to a Web site run by UC San Diego. 

Despite a border guard’s somewhat intense questioning, I got through quickly, in about 10 minutes.

Just a few feet away, in San Ysidro, the sun was rising over the horizon and the Leibkinkers had been waiting for me for a few minutes. The air was still cold, and Sandra was leading her two girls to a convenience store, where they grabbed an on-the-go breakfast — a Mrs. Fields cookie, corn nuts and a Frappuccino. 

Then they waited to be picked up by the van and the rest of their schoolmates, just a few hundred yards inside the United States. This morning, as we lingered on San Ysidro Boulevard, Chaya played with her cell phone, and Sandra combed Tali’s hair.

Born and raised in Mexico City, home to a thriving, traditional Jewish community of 40,000, the Leibkinkers moved north four years ago to Tijuana, which has a Jewish community of approximately 2,000, Sandra said. She said the reason was economic, but she didn’t go into additional details.

She and Israel, a graphic designer, are hoping soon to move the family to America — like so many Mexicans who move to Tijuana, according to Polichenco, who, in addition to running the Tijuana Chabad, runs one just north of the border in Chula Vista.

“Either it [Tijuana] is a stepping stone, or they like the possibilities that the U.S. gives them,” Polichenco said. “They like being by the border.”

Polichenco, a native of Buenos Aires, Argentina, opened the Tijuana Chabad in 1993, moving into a building on Avenida 16 de Septiembre, which the Jewish community built in 1965. For the past 10 years, he has arranged for the children’s transport, paying the costs by raising most of the needed $25,000 per year from philanthropists in Mexico and California. He said the students’ families contribute what they can, but overall, their payments cover less than half of the total cost.

The same goes for tuition, which, without financial aid, runs upward of $10,000 at Chabad Hebrew Academy and $19,800 at Torah High, for example. Polichenco said that none of the Mexican families is able to afford full tuition. They pay what they can, but many of the children need full scholarships.

Like many families in Tijuana, some members of these Jewish families are U.S. citizens, while others are not, which is why the dream of moving north as a family is not yet possible. In the Leibkinkers’ case, Sandra, Chaya and Tali all are U.S. citizens, but Sandra said that because her husband is not, they won’t be able to move as a family until he finds a job in America.

I asked immigration expert Claire Bergeron of the Migration Policy Institute about the Leibkinkers’ case, as it is often relatively easy for the spouse of a U.S. citizen to receive legal permanent residence in a timely manner. 

Bergeron confirmed that, yes, in many cases, a spouse can legally immigrate quite easily, often in less than 12 months. But there are loads of exceptions that can turn that wait time into years, including doubt over whether an applicant will be able to support himself or his family in the United States.

Yaakov Levy, a Tijuana resident and seventh-grader at Chabad Hebrew Academy, plays a hybrid game of flag football and Frisbee during P.E. class. 

At 3:30 p.m. — the end of the school day, Tali and Yaakov Levy, Raquel’s cousin, a seventh-grader who is also from Tijuana, played a hybrid game of flag football and Frisbee. “Sometimes you can tell that they are tired; that their day has been long,” Stanley said. It wasn’t showing on this day, as Yaakov sped past as his friends who were trying, in vain, to grab his flags.

Occasionally, but not often, the students encounter legal and paperwork issues at the border, said Chabad Hebrew Academy executive administrator Cindee Sutton. Vivian Sur said that when Fernando was a student at Chabad Hebrew Academy, the school made their lives much easier by assisting with the annual paperwork that the U.S. government required for Fernando to renew his student visa.

When there are legal issues at the border, the fix is usually simple  — a call to Polichenco tends to patch things up with the authorities — but it’s the students who suffer academically when things like immigration law get in the way.

“If they can’t come for a couple [days], we are going to make accommodations,” Stanley said. “Maybe have them sit out of P.E. or an elective to meet with their teacher.”

And as much as these students’ parents sacrifice to give their children a Jewish education, Stanley wishes she could meet with the parents more often. But the distance, and the border, makes that tough.

As P.E. wrapped up and the school day neared its end, Torres, the driver, waited at the front of the school. 

At the end of the day, leaving Chabad Hebrew Academy, we stopped back at Torah High to collect the final three students. As everyone settled in, and Fernando, Raquel and Atenas discussed typical high school topics — namely, other boys and girls — Rezi, the youngest Polichenco, was ecstatic when a bag of lollipops was passed her way.

Then, as Torres turned the key in the ignition, something went wrong — a strange clunking sound was coming from under the van’s hood. After trying without luck to start the car, Torres spent the next 90 minutes on the phone with Polichenco, GEICO and a local Russian mechanic Polichenco knows.

As the kids waited for the mechanics, they chatted, laughed, complained and walked around in the chilly dusk air. Eventually, Polichenco sorted out that a tow truck would drive the broken van to the Russian mechanic, while another van from a San Diego Chabad would be dropped off so Torres could drive the group back across the border, hopefully in time for the community’s celebration of little Elimelech Polichenco’s third birthday.

When the replacement van finally pulled up, the irony was palpable — after a day spent in the country where most of these children and their families hope to one day live and work, there was nothing but relief when our ride out of America and into Mexico arrived. 

Arrival time back in Tijuana? Around 7:30 p.m.

Tijuana to Tefilah: Crossing from Mexico to America with Jewish children who do it every day Read More »

Putin in Passover greeting: Russian Jews make huge contribution

Russian Jews are making an enormous contribution to strengthening Russian society’s cohesion, President Vladimir Putin wrote in a holiday greeting to the Jewish community.

Putin sent the greeting on Monday, the news site shturem.net reported Thursday, after meeting Rabbi Berel Lazar, a chief rabbi of Russia, at the Kremlin in Moscow.

[Related: Kerry condemns anti-Semitic leaflet in eastern Ukraine]

“The Jewish community in Russia is making an enormous contribution to strengthening the ties between various peoples and religions in our country; increasing trust and mutual understanding between individuals,” Putin wrote in his greeting, which shturem.net reproduced.

Putin also wrote that the Jewish community “works to preserve stability and consensus in the general public and actively participates in the education of the younger generation as well as charity and humanitarian actions.”

At his meeting with Lazar, Putin inquired as to the situation of the 10,000 Jews living in the Crimean Peninsula, which became part of the Russian Federation after its annexation last month from neighboring Ukraine — a move that prompted an international outcry and sanctions against Russia.

Lazar, a Chabad rabbi, told Putin that the Russian branch of the movement organized seders, or Passover meals, in three Crimean cities — Simferopol, Sevastopol and Yalta — the news site col.org.il reported.

Putin in Passover greeting: Russian Jews make huge contribution Read More »

After his hunger strike, Alan Gross’ backers ramp up calls for U.S. action

Alan Gross did not warn his family he was launching a hunger strike, but hearing the news, they understood why: The Jewish U.S. government subcontractor, languishing since 2009 in a Cuban prison, feels forgotten.

“We’re asking that the U.S. government do whatever it takes,” Jill Zuckman, a spokeswoman for the family, told JTA in an April 11 interview, the day Gross ended his fast after eight days. “This situation is not going to be resolved unless President Obama takes a personal interest in it.”

The intervention of his mother, Evelyn Gross, who turned 92 on Tuesday, led Gross to quit his hunger strike. In a statement, Gross said he was fed up with the approach of both Cuba and the United States.

“My protest fast is suspended as of today, although there will be further protests to come,” Gross, 64, of Potomac, Md., said in a statement. “There will be no cause for further intense protest when both governments show more concern for human beings and less malice and derision toward each other.”

Efforts to win Gross’ release have faced diplomatic and political obstacles. Cuba wants the release of its citizens who have been convicted of espionage, while anti-communist Cuban-Americans have been resistant to compromise.

It all leaves Gross and his advocates feeling ignored and seeking new ways of finding attention. Increasingly, Jewish groups have been criticizing the U.S. government’s handling of Gross’ case.

Quoting from the statement by Gross announcing his hunger strike, the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, the foreign policy umbrella body for U.S. Jewish groups, issued a similar pox-on-both-houses admonition.

“We believe that his case has not been given the urgent attention it warrants,” said the statement signed by Malcolm Hoenlein, the body’s executive vice president, and Robert Sugarman, its chairman. “The U.S. government has a special responsibility to Mr. Gross who is fasting to ‘object to mistruths, deceptions and inaction by the governments …’ and to call attention to ‘the lack of any reasonable or valid effort to resolve this shameful ordeal.’ ”

Gross was arrested in December 2009 while on a mission to hook up Cuba’s small Jewish community with the Internet. He is serving a 15-year sentence for “crimes against the state.”

He launched his hunger strike on April 3, leaving a message with his lawyer, Scott Gilbert, the next day.

“We didn’t know that he was going to go on a hunger strike,” Zuckman said. “We’ve all been very worried about him. He wasn’t in great health to begin with to not eat any solid foods for over a week.”

A final straw for Gross was the revelation that the U.S. Agency for International Development had launched a bid — after his arrest — to open a Twitter-like channel of communications to promote democracy and anti-regime sentiment among Cubans. The initiative ended in 2011 due to a lack of funding.

“Once Alan was arrested, it is shocking that USAID would imperil his safety even further by running a covert operation in Cuba,” Gilbert said in a statement. Gross had been subcontracting for a contractor that was working for USAID.

“USAID has made one absurdly bad decision after another,” the attorney said. “Running this program is contrary to everything we have been told by high-level representatives of the Obama Administration about USAID’s activities in Cuba.”

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry told the Senate on April 3 that efforts have been launched to free Gross but added he could not elaborate.

“We have a number of efforts underway, which I would be happy to talk to you about privately,” Kerry said in response to a question from Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), whose parents were Cuban immigrants. “But we are very, very focused on trying to get Alan Gross out of there. His treatment is inhumane. And he is wrongfully imprisoned.”

Gross’ family will not say what specifically they believe the Obama administration could do to free Gross. His wife, Judy, in 2011 had advocated humanitarian gestures for the so-called Cuban Five — Cubans who were convicted in the United States of spying offenses in 2001.

Since then, the Obama administration has released two of the five before their sentences were complete for good behavior. One of the two was allowed, while still on parole, to visit an ailing family member in Cuba.

Cuban officials have not explicitly offered Gross for the Cuban Five, but they have said it would be a natural trade. The Miami Herald on April 9 quoted Josefina Vidal, the Cuban official in charge of U.S. relations as saying that meeting the “humanitarian concerns” regarding the three spies still in prison could “resolve” Gross’ case.

The still-imprisoned Cubans had received longer sentences than the other two. One is serving a life term because of his involvement in the Cuban Air Force’s fatal 1996 downing of two planes belonging to a Cuban activist group. Four Americans were killed in the attack.

The Cuban government’s interests section here did not respond to a request for comment, but in the past its officials have said that the situations of Gross and the Cuban Five are not comparable. They noted that Gross was allowed to see his wife while in prison and the Cuban Five were not.

In its statement, the Presidents Conference said Gross is “being held hostage to apparently unrelated demands and actions.”

In an interview, Hoenlein did not explain who was making the demands or actions. But Hoenlein said the Obama administration has lifted some travel restrictions on Cuba, and he suggested refraining from further U.S. gestures toward Cuba pending a resolution of Gross’ situation.

“The feeling is there hasn’t been any serious negotiation,” he said. “We are doing things with the Cubans, we made concessions with Cubans. Maybe we have to hold back.”

Obama has eased some policies, including travel and money-transfer restrictions, but has held back on other rollbacks, in part because of the influence of American critics of Cuba.

A delicate issue for Gross’ advocates in the Jewish community is that some of the fiercest opponents of accommodation with Cuba are also some of Israel’s most prominent congressional allies, including Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), the chairman of the Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee.

Menendez, considered key by pro-Israel groups in overseeing the current nuclear talks with Iran headed by the United States, has expressed support for the Cuban Twitter program that triggered Gross’ hunger strike.

“The whole purpose of our democracy programs, whether it be in Cuba or other parts of the world, is in part to create a free flow of information in closed societies,” Menendez told The Associated Press, which uncovered the program’s existence.

After his hunger strike, Alan Gross’ backers ramp up calls for U.S. action Read More »

Let My People Know, Let My People Think

In recent years, in certain circles, it has become fashionable to assert that the Bible is fiction, or that at least key segments of it are fictional. The assertion emanates from two camps. In one of these camps are those who have been described as new or militant atheists. Looking to recent developments primarily in cosmology and archeology, folks like Richard Dawkins, Victor Stenger, Samuel Harris and the late Christopher Hitchens have created more than a cottage industry in their efforts to debunk the Bible.

But scientist and skeptics are not alone in their contention that the Bible is fiction. In another other camp are scholars of the Bible, including notable rabbis. For instance, during Passover week a dozen years ago, Conservative Rabbi and prolific author David Wolpe set off a firestorm when he spoke to his Los Angeles congregation about the lack of hard evidence for the Exodus story. According to a writer for the Los Angeles Times, after reviewing revolutionary discoveries in then current archeology, Rabbi Wolpe told them: 

“The truth is that virtually every modern archeologist who has investigated the story of the Exodus, with very few exceptions, agrees that the way the Bible describes the Exodus is not the way it happened, if it happened at all.”

(A subsequent summary of Wolpe’s thinking may readily be found on the Internet in a piece he authored called Did the Exodus Really Happen? (“Did It?”).)

As reported at the time in the Jewish Journal and Jweekly.com , reactions to Rabbi Wolpe’s comments were strong and heated. Some attacked the substance of his comments, holding to the Biblical rendition as factually true, a pillar of the Jewish edifice, regardless of what some archeologists found (or did not find). (Dennis Prager did so this week here.) Some attacked the setting of his comments, suggesting that Passover was not the proper season for that particular lesson.

Two years ago, the distinguished professor of liturgy at Hebrew Union College, also a prolific author, Rabbi Lawrence Hoffman published a post on his blog, Life and a Little Liturgy, titled The Bible is Fiction.”  In that post, Rabbi Hoffman did not discuss directly either Wolpe or the Exodus, cosmology or archeology, but argued more broadly that the entire Hebrew Bible is fiction because its authors meant it not as science or history but “as presentation.”

In contrast to the reception Wolpe received, the comments to Hoffman’s piece were overwhelmingly favorable. Whether the difference in reception is due to Wolpe clearing the air or to Hoffman preaching to a different choir, or at least in a less visible manner, is unclear.

In any event, at this point, one might think that a great breakthrough has been achieved, that the scientists, skeptics and clergy were all on the same page, fictional though it may be. Not quite. While the conclusion that the Bible is fiction is proof determinative for Dawkins et al. that there is no God, for rabbis Wolpe and Hoffman, the fictional nature of the Bible literally does not matter.  Both retain their faith in God. Yet their conclusion that the historicity of the Bible does not matter seems at least counterintuitive, and overreaching as well.  Does not matter to whom? For what purpose?

To test the proposition that facts do not matter, let’s recall that Wolpe’s sermons were premised on two points: (1) the absence of any archeological evidence to support an exodus from Egypt or a military conquest in Canaan between 1500-1200 BCE and (2) the existence of hard evidence that indicates a native and emerging presence of Israelites in Canaan by the end of that period. Now consider what would happen if there were solid archeological evidence of a significant Biblical event. For instance, what if a container holding two stone tablets dated 3,300 years ago and inscribed with the Ten Commandments were found in an underground cavern near Jerusalem? What if the bones of a man from that period were found on Mt. Nebo, with his skull exuding an unusual, but certain, radiance and his DNA consistent with the Cohen Modal Haplotype?  Doubtless, these items would be seen not just as evidence of the existence of the Ark of the Covenant and the prophet Moses, but as tangible proof of the truth of the entire Hebrew Bible, including the God described in it. Why? Because facts matter.

Unless, however, the Wolpe/Hoffman proposition is asymmetrical, operating in one direction only, the argument rings less than persuasively. For some people, and not just Dawkins et al., the contention that the Bible is fiction, but it does not matter, must sound a bit like the old wizard of Oz imploring visitors not to look behind the curtain. Yet it mattered to Dorothy, and to Scarecrow, Tin Man and Lion too, what was behind the curtain. It mattered, as it should have, whether there was a great wizard or just an old man caught in strange circumstances.

To be sure, it may not matter much if there was a real Abraham whose family traveled from Ur down the Fertile Crescent and into Canaan and Egypt. Nor may it matter that much if there were a real David who ruled over an expansive kingdom. But it should matter if there is a real Deity who made promises to a particular people about a particular land and who commanded these people to live their lives in a particular way or, conversely, that Deity and the words he reportedly spoke were pure fiction.

And, of course, for many people it does matter — a great deal. Some Jews base their lives on the premise that the God portrayed in the Hebrew Bible is real. They plan their week, their lives on that premise, eating certain foods and avoiding others, wearing certain clothes and avoiding others, engaging in certain behaviors, including some forms of intimate conduct,  and not others, desiring to reside in a certain locale and not another.  They are willing to live or die based on their belief in the truth of what they read in the Bible.

Similarly, for some non-Jews the truth of the Bible matters a great deal as well.  Just try to build the third Temple (or even a condo) on a certain rock in Jerusalem and you will see how much it matters.

In contrast to Wolpe, Hoffman’s viewpoint is not overtly dependent on what some archeologist may or may not find. His is a more text driven analysis. That is, aside from whether the characters portrayed in it actually lived (Hoffman says some did and some didn’t), the Bible’s characterization as fiction follows because, among other things, “of the reason it was compiled . . .  and its presentational nature as a world unto itself with its own unique lessons to impart.” Says Hoffman:

“If you want to know such things as the point of existence, the meaning of life and the ways humankind has gone right and wrong, you cannot do a whole lot better than start with fiction: that fiction is the Bible.”

Rabbi Hoffman’s argument that the authors of the Bible only meant their stories as presentational may well be correct, although one can argue the point. The greater problem here is that we cannot know for sure the authors’ intentions in writing, compiling and editing the text because we do not know for sure who those authors were, nor do we have agreement on what their purpose was. For instance, University of California professor Richard Elliott Friedman has suggested that writers in the ancient kingdoms of Judah and Israel were both familiar with the Egyptian slavery motif, but that they wrote about an exodus from Egyptian slavery differently in order to suit their different needs and goals. (See Friedman, Who Wrote the Bible? (Harper, 2d Ed. 1997) at 66.) But other contributors to the text may have had dissimilar or additional motives. So, was the story of the Exodus crafted by Northern Israelites before the destruction of their kingdom in order to encourage certain clan distinctiveness? Was the text redrafted after the destruction of the Northern Kingdom in order to unify a Judah swollen with northern immigrants?  Was it written during or immediately after the Exile by someone keenly aware of that trauma to urge a return to and rebuilding of the homeland? Was it written during the Persian Period as a lesson in survival outside of the homeland?

S. David Sperling, an HUC professor and rabbi, takes a different and rather novel tact. He agrees that the Exodus story, as written, is not historically accurate, but contends that there is an historical basis for an Exodus story. The focus, he argues, should not be on enslavement of pre-Israelites to Pharaoh in Egypt, but the slavery of the resident population to Egyptian control in Canaan. For Sperling, the Biblical Exodus is allegorical, but related to real events. (See Sperling, “Were the Jews Slaves in Egypt?”, see also, Sperling, The Original Torah (NYU Press 1998) at  41-60.)

Some scholars believe that the effort to try to determine the authorship, and therefore the intent, of Biblical texts is, if not a fool’s errand, at least doomed to failure. According to Israeli philosopher and political  theorist  Yoram Hazony, none of the current scholarly proposals “have . . . brought us much closer to really knowing what the original sources were . . ., who wrote them, when, or why.” (See Hazony, The Philosophy of Hebrew Scripture (Cambridge 2012), at 36.)                                             

Rabbi Hoffman’s text based approach is, therefore, no more complete and helpful than Rabbi Wolpe’s fact based one. Moreover, Wolpe and Hoffman, like the lady in the play Hamlet created to catch the king, appear to protest too much. (See Shakespeare, Hamlet, at II, ii.) After all, if the historicity of characters does not matter, if the historicity of events does not matter, why do they take such pains to insist that they do not matter?

For one thing, both Wolpe and Hoffman are believers. They retain faith in a God of Israel. If certain facts do not support those beliefs, and those facts cannot be altered or erased, what does one do? If you are a person of intellectual integrity, as are both Wolpe and Hoffman, you do two things. First, you confront and acknowledge reality, i.e., the absence of a factual base for certain characters and events. Then you segregate that reality from a deemed higher core value. 

Wolpe, therefore, would separate historical claims from faith claims. For him, the claim that “a certain number of people walked across a particular desert at a particular time in the past, after being enslaved and liberated, is a historical claim” subject to evaluation and refutation. (See “Did it?”, above.)  But, as he has recently summarized, “(i)t is not an historical claim that God created us and cares for us.” Consequently, the outcome of the historical evaluation does not “change our connection to each other or to God.” As he puts it, “Faith should not rest on splitting seas.” 

Hoffman, too, believes that God is real (a reality that matters), but also that the demonstration of that reality is not like demonstrating other forms of reality. Consequently, he is comfortable, where others might not be, in using the term as “a label to express a reality that certain types of phenomenon seem to presuppose.” (See Hoffman, above, at 7/7.)

The assertions of Wolpe and Hoffman that the Bible is fiction are welcome, but lo dayenu –not sufficient. Rabbi Wolpe says that at his Seder, in his mind’s eye, he sees the “Israelites marching out of Egypt, the miracles at the sea, the pillar of fire leading them through the fearful night . . . .” And he feels “enormous gratitude toward to God” for saving the Jewish people. But if there were no Israelite slaves in Egypt, no march out of Egypt, no miracles at the sea and no pillar of fire, how can those of us, who lack Rabbi Wolpe’s imagination and empathy, respond? We can agree that slavery is bad and freedom to be cherished. And we can surely agree that the survival of the Jewish people is unprecedented, not easily explained and that they and their value and ethical systems are to be appreciated, preserved and perpetuated. But that still, for many, will not span the space from a false historical there to an inspirational, even just functional, theology here.

Twenty-six centuries ago, faced with the stark new reality of the destruction of Judah, the deportation of the royal family and the dispersion of the residents, Jeremiah recognized that the old covenants regarding a promised land, an eternal Davidic monarchy and a numerous people were breached. He proposed, therefore, a new covenant, one of the heart. (See Jer.  31:31-34.) So, too, Ezekiel, in response to the trauma of the Exile, revised the rules on the inter-generational duration of sin and Deutero-Isaiah proclaimed a new mission. (See Ezek. 18:20, Isa. 51:4.)

One century ago, as he watched a largely immigrant community break free from the bonds of the Old Country, Mordecai Kaplan recognized that it was not enough to break worn idols. He also made sure to create new structures, new organizations, new philosophies and new texts in their place. He understood that a new generation in transition needed new models with new language consistent with their journey in the New Country.

The challenge for Jewish leadership today comes not so much from physical migration away from familiar settings or old confinements and persecutions, but from mental migration in minds expanded by new discoveries in a variety of disciplines and conveyed through new modes and systems. It is in the Jewish mind, as well as in the Jewish heart, that the future of the Jewish People will be decided.

So, sure, it is important to let our people know of the historical flaws in our foundational texts. Two cheers for Wolpe and Hoffman leading the way. But we need more. Because facts matter, and not everyone reads with allegorical or metaphorical lights, we need texts and programs in our schools and in our services that recognize plainly and explicitly and then incorporate certain Truths, truths about history, cosmology, biology and literature, for starters. That should not require that old stories and songs be abandoned, but it should at least mean that we take care not to perpetuate as accurate that which we know is not accurate, that we differentiate between what we say for purposes of quotation and what we say for purposes of affirmation.   

We should not fear this task. I am told by an exceptionally reliable source that God loves stories. I assume even true ones.

Another version of this post was published previously at www.judaismandscience.com.

Let My People Know, Let My People Think Read More »

Obamacare will be Obama’s second big takeaway

We tend to use shorthand to talk about our presidents. Lincoln saved the Union and freed the slaves. Kennedy committed us to the moon landing and built the Peace Corps. FDR ended the Depression, created Social Security and won World War II.  

It’s hard to know in the middle of a presidency what will be remembered, and even then it may change. Right now, LBJ is getting a new look beyond Vietnam, to include civil rights, poverty and Medicare. Someday Nixon will move beyond Watergate, and negotiations with the USSR and China will have their due. Even poor Jimmy Carter may someday get some props for the Middle East peace agreement. Can’t hold out a lot of hope for George W. Bush, though, unless painting becomes a historical test of presidents.

In the moment, presidencies are so eventful, it’s hard to guess what will last. The killing of Osama bin Laden? Who talks about that anymore?  More people talk about Monica Lewinsky, which sadly will loom large in remembering Bill Clinton, an otherwise very successful president.

It’s clear, though, that for Barack Obama, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is going to be the second takeaway after the first African-American presidency. Not so many weeks ago, people were talking about the collapsed Obama presidency and his limited role in history. The ACA was on its last legs. That, however, may be about to change.

Historians will surely note how many turns there were, how many debatable choices and some mistakes, mostly preventable, this White House made before the turnaround. Making health care priority No. 1 in 2009 reduced the Obama administration’s ability to fight more aggressively for a larger economic stimulus, costing his party massive losses in 2010 and resulting in Congressional gridlock that deepened the economic recession. Letting a group of Senate centrists delay passage of the health care law until the summer of 2009 allowed the Tea Party to negatively define the law, an image that only now is being challenged as Obamacare’s implementation finally takes shape.  

Of course, the utterly foreseeable catastrophe of the health care rollout in September completely squandered the Democratic gains that might have come from the government shutdown.

But through it all, the president held onto his path and has been rewarded with results that are simply stunning. His bet on a flawed, complicated half-loaf health care program that not only enraged his opponents but also demoralized many of his supporters may yet pay off in the long run. The new numbers of enrollees are concrete evidence that this has happened, and it is big both governmentally and politically.  Nearly 10 million Americans have a crucial benefit they didn’t have before, yielding virtually unlimited personal stories for political debate.  

If the law continues to expand its reach within the red states that have blocked Medicaid expansion, millions more will be added to the rolls of those with assured health care. It’s really remarkable that in most cases this law drives the cost of benefits lower rather than higher and that Democrats were not afraid of its anti-poverty elements. This will be the first broad working-class and lower-middle-class law that Democrats have implemented since the 1960s.  

In fact, this is so big that, as in the past, previous presidencies will now be seen in a new light. When LBJ signed the Medicare Act in 1965, he went to the Truman Library in Independence, Mo., so that Harry S. Truman, who had tried and failed to win such a law, could witness the signing. As we continue to revise our understanding of LBJ’s presidency, his 1965 victory on Medicare will be amplified by the success of the ACA.  And reminders of Republican opposition to Medicare are already making the rounds of the political world, to suggest to voters how history might be repeating itself.

It’s also remarkable that the long-cherished goal of widespread health coverage has taken a perhaps irreversible step at roughly the same moment that the Supreme Court decided to further open the floodgates for oligarchy in campaign spending, leading to claims that American democracy is dead. And even more oddly, the Supreme Court is also the one institution that could have stopped the ACA, and despite its right-leaning tendencies, it was the one, by a 5-4 majority, that allowed the law to survive — on Chief Justice John Roberts’ vote.  Talk about dramatic stakes. I wonder if Roberts worried that the court’s conservative majority could not do to the ACA what an earlier court did to Roosevelt’s early New Deal without setting off a political war it could not win, and that might jeopardize its other goals.  

The ACA is not out of the woods yet. In fact, the next obstacle in the long and winding story of the ACA is the potential for a Supreme Court decision to block subsidies for health care under the ACA in states that did not set up exchanges. If people already have insurance and subsidies, the court may be wary of taking them away. There may be a race against time to get those benefits locked in before the High Court rules.

If the ACA keeps going, much of Obama’s remaining time in office may focus not only on an economic agenda (minimum wage, equal pay and other measures) but also on working through the ramifications of the new health care law and fixing problems that arise. The impact of expanded health insurance is going to expand beyond health care. A new study for the Rand Corp. contends that the ACA will have the effect of lowering the cost of liability for auto insurance. Unbound from restrictions on pre-existing medical conditions, people may also feel freer to leave bad jobs and look for new ones, competition that may drive up wages and strengthen coalitions for a higher minimum wage. And the Medicaid expansion alone puts Democrats back on a path they have veered from since the days of Lyndon Johnson: directly helping low-income and lower middle-class Americans to survive and thrive. 

In theory, Democrats would be more likely to get the active votes of working people who need things that they don’t have (a belief that animated much of the Romney camp’s explanation for his defeat). But it often doesn’t work that way. Being hopeless and overwhelmed can make the act of voting seem to be a waste of time.

Latinos, working-class voters, young people and unmarried women all are widely known to be stay-at-homes in off-year elections like 2014 — and then they get hammered in public policy, including the voter suppression laws aimed at keeping them away from the polls that passed after the 2010 Republican sweep.  

 For folks who are struggling, it’s more important to gain something worth protecting than to have to dream of getting it. As Obama is discovering with Latinos with regard to deportations, Democrats are foolish to think they will win votes by saying, “Look how hard we are trying to get you what we need, while those mean Republicans keep it away from you.” 

A little security can do wonders. Having the ability to see the doctor without going bust may make enough of an impression to create a bit of that sense of “political efficacy.” What opponents of the ACA have called “dependency” on government is really something quite different — the creation of confident people who are more likely to play their role in the governance of American democracy.


Raphael J. Sonenshein is executive director of the Edmund G. “Pat” Brown Institute of Public Affairs at California State University, Los Angeles.

Obamacare will be Obama’s second big takeaway Read More »

Anti-Semitic fliers in Ukraine: Who is responsible?

Secretary of State John Kerry condemned as “grotesque” on Thursday the distribution of leaflets in eastern Ukraine that appeared to call on Jews to register with separatist, pro-Russian authorities.

Though purported authors of the flier described it as a crude attempt to discredit them, Kerry said: “Notices were sent to Jews in one city indicating that they had to identify themselves as Jews … or suffer the consequences.

“In the year 2014, after all of the miles traveled and all of the journey of history, this is not just intolerable; it's grotesque. It is beyond unacceptable,” he said in Geneva, where he met Russian, Ukrainian and EU counterparts to draw up a four-way agreement to work to defuse the crisis in eastern Ukraine.

Kerry said Russian Orthodox Church members in Ukraine had also received threats “that the Ukrainian Orthodox Church was somehow going to attack them in the course of the next days.”

“That kind of behavior, that kind of threat, has no place,” he said.

Kerry said all parties at the Geneva meeting had condemned such threats and intimidation.

The origin of the leaflets in Donetsk was unclear.

On Wednesday, local news site Novosti Donbassa quoted unidentified members of Donetsk's Jewish community as saying three masked men handed them out near the city's synagogue on Monday, when Jews were celebrating the start of Passover.

Purporting to be issued by the Donetsk People's Republic, a pro-Russian group which last week took over public buildings and wants to end rule by the new Ukrainian government in Kiev, the leaflet said all Jews aged over 16 must register with a “commissar” at the regional government headquarters by May 3.

Failure to comply would lead to deportation and the “confiscation of property”.

Its preamble explained that action was being taken because Jewish leaders had supported the “junta” which took power in Kiev after the overthrow of the Moscow-backed president.

Kirill Rudenko, a spokesman for the People's Republic of Donbass, said the statement was “complete rubbish”: “We made no such demands on Jews,” he said. “We have nothing against Jews.

“This is just another attempt to tarnish our image … It is a crude forgery.”

Once home to a large Jewish population that was devastated by the Holocaust, Ukraine has seen a rise in attacks on Jews and on synagogues since unrest began five months ago.

Some Ukrainian nationalist groups which took part in the uprising in Kiev have been blamed for fanning anti-Semitic sentiment. Anti-Semitism is also apparent among some Russian nationalists.

U.S. State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said in Washington that the United States was still trying to determine who was behind the leaflets and added: “We take any anti-Semitism very seriously.”

An influential U.S. congresswoman called the leaflet episode

“an unacceptable escalation of the crisis in Ukraine and cause for both grave concern and immediate action”.

Nita Lowey, the senior Democrat on the U.S. House Appropriations Committee, said in a letter to Kerry that the singling out of Jewish communities for scrutiny and possible punishment “reeks of age-old anti-Semitic policies”.

“All of the parties involved in the ongoing crisis in Ukraine must understand in no uncertain terms that the world community will not tolerate such contemptible and atrocious behavior,” she said.

U.S. Senator Charles Schumer, the No. 3 Democrat in the Senate, said Russian President Vladimir Putin “has accused the Ukrainians recently of being anti-Semitic, but now it is pro-Russian forces that are engaged in these grotesque acts”.

He urged Putin to denounce the anti-Semitic acts and use his influence to stop them.

Reporting by Arshad Mohammed in Geneva, Gabriel Baczynska in Donetsk, Alastair Macdonald in Kiev and David Brunnstrom in Washington; Editing by Tom Heneghan and Eric Walsh

Anti-Semitic fliers in Ukraine: Who is responsible? Read More »

Local mom-athoner pounds pavement for a cure

Shannon Griefer ran a 135-mile ultramarathon in Death Valley in the middle of July, across the scorching hot terrain in the glow of the fiery sun. 

And on April 13, she was slated to run 135 miles, this time to benefit reserch into a condition she was diagnosed with in 2005: multiple sclerosis (MS). Despite her illness, Griefer, a 52-year-old mother of three, doesn’t let the disease slow her down. 

“My ultramarathon running is a metaphor for my life and for my disease,” she said. “It hurts to run 100 miles and you feel bad and you want to quit. But you can’t just quit and leave the race. You have to keep going. And you have to keep fighting MS. It’s the perfect thing for me to do to help others who have it a lot worse than me.”

It seemed natural, then, for her to be selected to kick off this year’s MS Run the U.S., a 3,000-mile relay beginning in Calabasas and ending four months  later in New York City. Griefer’s assigned segment included the Santa Clarita Valley, Palmdale and Victorville, where temperatures dip to 40 degrees at night at this time of year. She expected to run to Barstow over the course of  two days.

“If it’s 2 a.m. and I’m tired and freezing, I’ll sleep until sunrise or take a break until the sun comes out,” she told the Journal before the relay, which took place after this issue’s press deadline.

MS affects an estimated 400,000 in the United States alone, according to the National Multiple Sclerosis Society. It occurs when the immune system attacks myelin, the substance that surrounds and shields the central nervous system’s nerve fibers, as well as the nerve fibers themselves. The damaged myelin forms scar tissue, which interrupts the nerve impulses that go to and from the brain and spinal cord. Symptoms can include walking and balance issues, fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, pain and depression. 

Griefer, an entrepreneur, owns Moeben, a sportswear company specializing in UV-protective arm sleeves, and swimwear business Jetanna. She also coaches ultramarathon runners on the side and volunteers at a children’s hospital. She said that nine years ago, when she was first diagnosed, she was having hallucinations, even while running. Her neurologist told her that an upcoming run she was set to compete in would be her last; afterward, she took a vacation with her husband at the time, who wanted her to relax before starting treatment. On the trip, she became pregnant with her third son. No new lesions appeared on her brain for a while, which the doctor told her was a miracle.

These days, she can still function well — every week she runs 20 to 30 miles while training around her home in Hidden Hills. But she does face physical challenges on a regular basis. 

“My left side is mostly affected,” she said. “At times I wear a sling, because the arm becomes dead weight. I need help getting dressed sometimes.”

In the past, she’s also lost hair and gained weight when receiving injections of Copaxone, a drug designed to decrease the frequency of MS relapses. Right now, she has 60 lesions on her brain. 

Maybe all of these difficulties are actually part of why she continues to run.

“When people are given this diagnosis, they get depressed and they don’t want to do anything,” she said. “It’s important that I run. It shows other people that you can run 135 miles in two days — or five miles a day.”

Ashley Kumlien, whose mother was diagnosed with MS in 1980, started the nonprofit behind the race in 2009. According to the Wisconsin native, there are 14 runners this year, some doing back-to-back segments, who will be passing off their batons across the country. Aside from Griefer, two other runners in the race have MS. Last year, $175,000 was raised for the organization.

Kumlien said she was impressed with Griefer and accepted her application to be a runner after Griefer found out about the relay online. 

“It’s important that Shannon is participating because she’s living with MS and she’s an endurance runner,” Kumlien said. “She’s had some ups and downs recently with her symptoms. On some level, this event will give individuals living with MS a purpose.”

Many of the runs Griefer has taken part in have benefited charities for sick and/or autistic children. She said that one of the reasons she chooses to take part is to give back and set an example for her three boys. 

“You never know what someone is going through until you’re given a diagnosis,” she said. “I’m glad it’s me and not my kids, but MS is hereditary. There are so many ways to run races to help other people. My kids should give back. I instilled this in them. I want to help others who don’t have it as good as we do.”

She hopes they pick up another lesson, too.

“I want to show my kids that there will be obstacles and hurdles and tough times in life. Never give up. Keep fighting.”

Local mom-athoner pounds pavement for a cure Read More »

Israel’s Eytan Fox puts frosting on ‘Cupcakes’

The name Eytan Fox instantly evokes two associations. The New York-born director is one of Israel’s most accomplished filmmakers, and he is the country’s most visible and outspoken gay personality.

Fox’s films, like “Yossi & Jagger,” “Yossi” and “Walk on Water” revolve around gay relationships, usually with sad or conflicted undertones.

So it comes as something of a surprise that his latest production is a lively, humorous and nostalgic musical, with the light-hearted title “Cupcakes” (the Hebrew title is “Bananot” or bananas).

In its songs and depicted lifestyle, the film, co-written by Eli Bijaoui and Fox, harks back to the pop-tune era of the 1970s in an Israel where, at least in fond recollections, everybody knew everybody else, helped one another and minded everyone’s business.

Time may have sweetened recollections, but there is something to one actor’s description of the 1960s and ’70s as a time “when you went to a neighbor to borrow a cup of sugar and stayed for coffee.”

In that same spirit, six young to early-middle-aged people living in the same Tel Aviv shikun (apartment house) know each other, celebrate together and commiserate with each other over their problems.

The six characters, portrayed by some of Israel’s most popular actors, are Ofer (Ofer Shechter), a gay kindergarten teacher; Anat (Anat Waxman), who runs a bakery shop; Efrat (Efrat Dor), a lesbian guitarist; Keren (Keren Berger), a shy, bespectacled blogger; Yael (Yael Bar-Zohar), a former Miss Israel turned lawyer; and Dana (Dana Ivgy), who works for a right-wing politician to please her Orthodox father.

One evening, when the friends get together, a downhearted Anat reveals that her husband has just left her and gone to Thailand. To console her, the friends break into an impromptu song, which tells her that though the present may be miserable, there are better days ahead. (The song was actually composed by Scott “Babydaddy” Hoffman of the pop group Scissor Sisters).

Someone takes a cellphone video of the singing sextet, and Ofer, without telling anyone, sends it on to the selection committee charged with picking Israel’s entry for the upcoming Universong competition.

Universong stands for the annual Eurovision Song Contest face-off, which was a very big deal in the 1970s, with each European country (plus Israel) sending its most talented — or weirdest — singers and dancers.

As in every good fairytale musical, the Israeli judges surprisingly choose “A Song for Anat” for its simplicity and genuine sentiment, and then set about changing it into a phony, overblown production number.

The judges also like the group’s diversity, one of them observing, “Too bad you don’t also have an Arab.”

However, the sextet, now performing under the name “Anat the Baker,” rebels against the imposed phoniness, and the members return to their original personas. They prevail, but the revolt costs them the government’s financial support. Again, all seems lost, but the day is saved through a kind of national crowdfunding appeal.

So the group flies to Paris for the contest, with every TV set in Israel tuned in. And, finally, the winner is … 

Sorry, you’ll have to buy a ticket to a “Cupcakes,” screening on May 3 and 5 at the upcoming Los Angeles Jewish Film Festival to find out.

For all the let’s-put-on-a-show brio of “Cupcakes,” there are some probing questions. Most telling is the impact on the five women, who suddenly realize that if they accept the unforeseen gig, each will have to leave her comfort zone and risk public exposure, and, quite possibly, derision.

In the end, loyalty to the group and the lure of embarking on a once-in-a-lifetime challenge overcome fear and hesitation, and the adventure is on.

Fox was not immediately available for comment, but in an earlier interview with FilmLinc Daily, he was asked about his transition from making “serious” films to creating “Cupcakes.”

“I have various stories in me,” Fox replied. “It’s just like I can watch a serious [Belgian brothers Luc and Jean-Pierre] Dardenne film and be moved to tears, so I can watch a fun comedy. I actually watched ‘Four Weddings and a Funeral’ on television the other day.

“So I can do both, just like I can listen to [classical] music and then dream about going to Las Vegas and seeing Britney Spears. I love the genre, and if I had all the money in the world, I’d make a big musical. If I think about ‘Cupcakes,’ there are undertones of things I have dealt with in other films. The longing for some things Israel used to be, such as a strong sense of community and the group aspect, common goals, etc.” 

The Los Angeles Jewish Film Festival will screen “Cupcakes” on May 3 at 8 p.m. at Laemmle’s Music Hall in Beverly Hills, and again on May 5, at 7:30 p.m. at Laemmle’s Town Center in Encino. For more information and tickets, visit lajfilmfest.org or phone Brown Paper Tickets at (800) 838-3006.

Israel’s Eytan Fox puts frosting on ‘Cupcakes’ Read More »