fbpx

March 15, 2012

Rep. Adam Schiff endorses Berman over Sherman

Rep. Adam Schiff (D – Burbank) has endorsed Rep. Howard Berman (D – Van Nuys) for reelection in the 30th district.

Berman, who is locked in an all-out battle with fellow Democratic incumbent Congressman Brad Sherman (Sherman Oaks), had already received the support of most of California’s Democratic representatives when Schiff made his endorsement, which was announced by the Berman campaign on March 14.

Berman, Schiff said in a statement, “has been a mentor and a leader on some of the most challenging issues of our time. There are not many Representatives who can rightly be called ‘statesman,’ but Howard is one of them, and I am proud to support him.”

“After working closely with Congressman Berman for the past decade,” Schiff’s statement continued, “I know that his wisdom, experience and tireless advocacy must not be lost.”

With the addition of Schiff, the total number of Democratic incumbents in Congress backing Berman rises to 24, a number that includes Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D – Santa Ana), who has endorsed both Berman and Sherman. Sherman has also received endorsements from two other members of California’s Democratic delegation in Congress, Reps. Judy Chu (D – El Monte) and Grace Napolitano (D – Norwalk), neither of whom have endorsed Berman.

While the 23 other representatives backing Berman announced their support for the congressman back in November 2011, Schiff’s endorsement came only after the March 9 filing deadline for candidates wishing to be on California’s ballot had passed.

Rep. Adam Schiff endorses Berman over Sherman Read More »

British publisher to fight ‘Mein Kampf’ ban

A British publisher is vowing to fight a Munich court’s decision to permanently ban his publication of excerpts of Hitler’s “Mein Kampf.”

Peter McGee wanted to print excerpts last January in a 16-page insert to his German publication “Zeitungszeugen,” or “Newspaper Witnesses,” together with critical commentary from historians. The insert, one of three planned supplements, also would have been sold separately. But the Munich Regional Court last week upheld a restraining order issued by a lower court that barred McGee from fulfilling his goal.

The court said the right to “cite” a text does not mean it is acceptable to publish excerpts.

McGee told reporters that he respected the court decision and would not sell his supplement, which is titled “The Unreadable Book.” He said his goal was not to sensationalize but to demystify the text, and that he would continue to fight the court decision. According to the German Press Agency dpa, McGee had to make the excerpts from Hitler’s book illegible by pixilating the texts.

The Bavarian Finance Ministry holds the copyright, which bars publication until 2015 — 70 years after Hitler’s death.

In 2010, the Munich-based Institute for Contemporary History was granted permission to reprint the work after the copyright runs out.

Historian Edith Raim, who is working on the annotated edition for the institute, said in an interview that excerpts of the book were published decades ago in Germany, notably by the late German historian Werner Maser.

British publisher to fight ‘Mein Kampf’ ban Read More »

At home, on stage and screen

Somewhere in Creede, Colo., en route to a mountain cabin in Santa Fe, N.M., Mandy Patinkin is above 10,000 feet. “If I sound stupid, it’s because there’s no oxygen up here,” he says.

No chance of that. In fact, Patinkin — a legitimate star of stage, screen and song for more than 25 years — is quite articulate, and in good spirits. Given that many know Mandel Bruce Patinkin primarily through some rather dark and tumultuous characters, including Saul Berenson, the conflicted CIA mentor he plays on Showtime’s acclaimed series “Homeland,” the jokes and lighthearted self-reflection are welcome.

And authentic, says Patinkin, 59, who adds, “What I want more than anything is to be hopeful and optimistic.

“For the majority of my career, the music I have performed all over the world has been the furthest thing from darkness,” he continues. “The one caveat I would offer to that is that I have an affinity for the music of Stephen Sondheim. I feel that he writes like Shakespeare, and both of these people struggle with darkness. But the gifts they have left humanity is that, in the body of their works, they have struggled through darkness to show the light.” 

En route to his first vacation in “I can’t remember when,” Patinkin soon will return to sea level to a full slate of concerts — some with longtime friend and co-“Evita” Tony winner Patti LuPone and some solo — as well as production on the second season of “Homeland,” which starts shooting in May.  Also on the Patinkin docket: trying out a two-person performance with cross-dressing artist Taylor Mac titled “The Last Two People on Earth” and — whenever possible — collaborating with his songwriter son, Gideon Grody-Patinkin, a musician the elder Patinkin says he seeks out for creative advice rather than the other way around.

His schedule, Patinkin concedes, can get Byzantine — so crowded, in fact, that a Tel Aviv run of the Anne Frank-themed play “Compulsion,” which he headlined in 2011 in New York, will have to wait. Still, his current slate of projects is feeding his soul. “An Evening With Patti LuPone and Mandy Patinkin,” which opens a six-day run at the Thousand Oaks Performing Arts Center on March 20, is an always welcome chance to take the stage, while the first season of “Homeland” was, in Patinkin’s words, “One of the most extraordinary experiences of my career.”

That’s saying something. Patinkin burst onto the scene in 1979, winning a Tony Award for his portrayal of Che Guevara in the Broadway premiere of Andrew Lloyd Webber’s “Evita.” In 1984, he earned a Tony nomination creating the role of Georges Seurat in Sondheim’s “Sunday in the Park With George.” A successful TV career followed, with extended stints on “Chicago Hope” (earning Patinkin an Emmy in 1995), “Dead Like Me” and “Criminal Minds.” On the big screen, in such films as “The Princess Bride,” “Alien Nation,” “Yentl” and “Dick Tracy,” Patinkin has worked with the likes of Warren Beatty, Madonna and Barbra Streisand.

Patinkin sang in his synagogue choir while growing up on Chicago’s South Side, but his music career came about almost by accident. Since kicking off a series of off-night performances at the Public Theatre in the mid-1980s at the suggestion of Public Theater impresario Joseph Papp, Patinkin has never stopped singing, doing regular concerts and cutting CDs, including the all-Yiddish “Mamaloshen.”

The music he performs, Patinkin points out, is usually upbeat, especially when he’s working with LuPone.

“If I’m tired and exhausted and something happens, I’ll probably lean more toward the darker side of experiencing the moment,” Patinkin says, “and Patti is almost exhaustingly optimistic and positive, so she doesn’t allow on stage or off any sadness, for the most part.

“I love that,” Patinkin continues. “She is the best medicine in the world for me. Don’t think I don’t have tough times, but I go back to that drugstore of hope and optimism whenever I can.”

Patinkin and LuPone were at Juilliard at the same time, although in different classes, and they never met. Patinkin recalls being blown away by LuPone’s work in a student production, and several years later, the two actors came together again in a New York rehearsal room for “Evita” with Patinkin cast as Che Guevara, the conscience of Argentina, opposite LuPone’s Eva Peron.

The two performers stayed in touch over the ensuing years. In 2002, Patinkin was invited to perform at the opening of a theatrical complex in Texas. The organizer told Patinkin that LuPone was slated to perform, and he told LuPone that Patinkin had also committed.

“The truth was, he didn’t have either one of us,” Patinkin says. “Even though he lied, when he came to ‘Patti-Mandy’ on Broadway, I told him, ‘I’m counting on you to lie again so I’ll get the next great thing in my life.’”

The resulting two-person performance, guided by Patinkin’s longtime musical partner Paul Ford, charted the creative journey of two musical souls, incorporating classics from the Great American Songbook, as well as other works, such as a Rodgers & Hammerstein set from “South Pacific” and “Carousel.”

“We’re theater animals,” Patinkin says of himself and LuPone. “We both love the theater, and we deeply love performing. I think it’s where we both feel the most alive.”

It was in the midst of another theater production, “Compulsion,” that Patinkin received the script for a television pilot based on an Israeli series called “Prisoners of War” (its original title was “Hatufim”). The producers, Howard Gordon and Alex Gansa of “24,” wanted Patinkin badly enough that they were willing to work around his crazy schedule. The pilot of “Homeland” would shoot in Charlotte, N.C., and, in order to accommodate Patinkin, who was doing tech rehearsals for “Compulsion” at the Public Theatre in New York, they flew him back and forth between New York and Charlotte.

“It couldn’t have been a worse calendar,” says Patinkin, who had not seen the original Israeli series. “But I read the pilot script and gave it to the smartest people in my world — my wife and my dearest friend — and said, ‘Tell me if I’m crazy, but this is one of the finest things I’ve ever read.’ ”

“Homeland,” which recently garnered two Golden Globes — best television series (drama) and best actress in a television series (drama) — is a riveting, serialized thriller: In post-9/11 America,  rogue CIA agent Carrie Matheson (Claire Danes) suspects that U.S. Marine Sgt. Nicholas Brody (Damian Lewis), who returns to a hero’s welcome after eight years as an Iraqi prisoner of war, has been “turned” and is now a threat to the nation. The agency largely ignores Carrie’s suspicions and her erratic choices even threaten to jeopardize Saul Berenson (Patinkin’s character), her wise mentor and longtime friend.

“It’s a very complicated series of relationships,” he says. “I have never been in a piece where I’ve been on the edge of my seat waiting with bated breath for the next script to come in. I’ve told the writers, ‘Don’t tell me what’s going to happen, whether I’m a good guy or a bad guy.’ In either case, the modus operandi is that I believe in what I’m doing.”

Berenson is Jewish, as are many of the characters Patinkin has portrayed in his long career.

“Being a Jew is who I am,” he says.  It informs every aspect of who I am.”
   

“An Evening With Patti LuPone and Mandy Patinkin” plays March 20-25 at the Thousand Oaks Civic Arts Plaza. For more information, please visit jewishjournal.com.

At home, on stage and screen Read More »

Two rabbis join George Clooney in protest of Sudanese government

In the ceaseless work of repairing the world, George Clooney will rub shoulders with two activist rabbis, who will join him tomorrow at the Sudanese Embassy in Washington to protest the Sudanese government’s blockade of food and humanitarian aid to endangered citizens.

The actor has been crusading on behalf of Sudanese civilians for nearly a decade, though the situation remains dire. Clooney has apparently found two allies in Rabbi David Saperstein, director of the Religious Action Center for Reform Judaism and Rabbi Steve Gutow, president for the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, who will join him for at least one leg of a Washington trip that will reportedly culminate with meetings with President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, according to The Daily Beast.

Earlier this week, Clooney made an illegal trip to the oil rich region of the Nuba Mountains in central Sudan, where the Arab-dominated Sudanese government has been conducting missile strikes against its own citizens. Much like the situation in Sderot, Israel, where inhabitants live in fear of aerial attacks, Clooney captured the everyday challenges these Sudanese villagers face in a Youtube video.

But while Clooney’s celebrity has brought needed attention to the region, it has not resolved the conflict. Clooney told the Council on Foreign Relations Tuesday night that the situation is worse than ever.

The battle for survival in a hostile environment is a familiar struggle for Jews the world over, who have been subjected to the worst impulses of humanity over the course of their existence. Let this be a wake-up call and rallying cry that no one should rest until the whole world is redeemed.

From an Associated Press report on Clooney’s work:

NAIROBI, Kenya (AP) — In the second YouTube video in a week to highlight an African conflict, George Clooney makes an illegal and dangerous trip to the southern reaches of Sudan, where the actor witnesses what an American activist said Thursday was likely a Chinese-made missile sail overhead.

Clooney’s four-minute video highlights attacks on civilians in Sudan’s Nuba Mountains, a region that U.S. officials say could soon suffer a severe hunger crisis. The video comes about a week after a YouTube sensation about Joseph Kony, the leader of the brutal Central Africa militia the Lord’s Resistance Army.

In the Clooney video, which he wrote and directed, a man from the Nuba community is seen pushing Clooney to take cover after a rocket sails overhead. Mothers carrying children and young children lugging water jugs can be seen moving toward the rock caves.

Ryan Boyette, an American who lives in the Nuba Mountains, said Sudan’s military has been launching large, Chinese-made rockets against civilians — not military forces with the rebel group known as the SPLM-N. Boyette said most of the rocket victims are caught off guard because they don’t know the rocket is approaching.

….

During his advocacy work in Sudan, Clooney helped found the Satellite Sentinel Project, which uses satellite imagery to monitor activities of war.

Two rabbis join George Clooney in protest of Sudanese government Read More »

Opinion: A call to boycott former Pink Floyd front man, Roger Waters

As many of you know, Israel is under assault. However, the perpetrators are not only Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran, but rather artists and musicians who are engaged in a Boycott/Divestment/Sanctions (BDS) campaign against Israel. Popular musicians—including Elvis Costello, The Pixies, Carlos Santana, The Gorillaz and Roger Waters—are refusing to perform in Israel, in order to punish the tiny Jewish state.

Roger Waters, former lead singer of the popular rock band Pink Floyd, wrote at length about his decision to boycott the state of Israel.

Here is part of what he said:

“In my view, the abhorrent and draconian control that Israel wields over the besieged Palestinians in Gaza, and the Palestinians in the occupied West Bank (including East Jerusalem), coupled with its denial of the rights of refugees to return to their homes in Israel, demands that fair minded people around the world support the Palestinians in their civil, nonviolent resistance…For me it means declaring my intention to stand in solidarity, not only with the people of Palestine, but also with the many thousands of Israelis who disagree with their governments racist and colonial policies, by joining a campaign of Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) against Israel, until it satisfies three basic human rights demanded in international law.

1. Ending its occupation and colonization of all Arab lands [occupied since 1967] and dismantling the Wall;

2. Recognizing the fundamental rights of the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality; and

3. Respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and properties as stipulated in UN resolution 194.”

So basically, Waters is calling for a boycott of Israel, until all the “Palestinian refugees” are allowed back in, effectively destroying it as the homeland of the Jewish people.

That Roger Waters, and so many other artists, would boycott the only true democracy in the Middle East—the only country that upholds the progressive values and human rights he supposedly lauds—shows how far anti-Semitism has pervaded our culture.

Many musicians boycott Israel because of peer-pressure, and because of pressure from anti-Israel hate groups. They succumb to this pressure because there does not seem to be any repercussions for boycotting Israel.

Well, I believe this is the perfect opportunity for Israel supporters to take a stand, and say “enough is enough!” If Roger Waters wishes to starve Israel economically then we should do the same back to him.

Roger Waters is scheduled to perform at the Coliseum in Los Angeles, May 19th of this year. This event will most certainly be attended by many Jews, as Roger Waters is extremely popular, and Los Angeles comprises one of the largest Jewish communities in the world. But maybe we can change that, and send a message to Roger Waters, and any other musician who is considering a boycott of Israel.

Please inform all your friends about Roger Waters’ boycott of Israel, and urge them to not attend his concert. Call up his management, write on his Facebook page, and do whatever else you can to let Roger know that boycotting Israel comes with consequences.

This is the perfect opportunity for Jewish liberals and conservatives, AIPAC and J-Street, to unite under a common cause, and make it clear that trying to economically destroy the only Jewish State will not go unnoticed.

We are not saying that people cannot criticize Israel. Of course they can. But there is a stark difference between criticism and a boycott. Let’s be clear—to single out the only Jewish state for hateful and economically harmful boycotts, is simply anti-Semitic.

Opinion: A call to boycott former Pink Floyd front man, Roger Waters Read More »

Segel’s starry-eyed man-child amuses and moves us

Jason Segel folded his 6-foot-4-inch frame compactly onto a couch at the Four Seasons Hotel and placed his hand upon his chin. Quirky and thoughtful in conversation, the star and co-writer of such comic hits as “The Muppets” and “Forgetting Sarah Marshall” spoke eloquently on topics ranging from the works of Joseph Campbell to his own gothic mansion in the West Hollywood hills, where he lives surrounded by puppets and other artifacts that reveal his penchant for the macabre (think Edward Gorey and Tim Burton). 

On this sunny morning he’s wearing pinstriped suit pants, a checked button-down shirt and his curly hair is slicked practically straight up, giving him the appearance of a fetching Tim Burton character himself. His size comes up often: “I’m terrified of having kids; I’m afraid I’ll crush them like Lennie from “Of Mice and Men,’ ” he said. And of the 19th century gothic author Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley: “Frankenstein is the most tragic of all the monsters,” he opined, shaking his head sadly. “He just wants Dr. Frankenstein to love him, and actually speaks very articulately in a beautiful monologue — very much like, ‘I didn’t ask for any of this.’ ”

Segel has used his own gentle-giant melancholy to comic advantage from his early career in the television shows of Judd Apatow to the more recent bromance “I Love You, Man.” It is perhaps even more effective in his latest turn, as the overgrown man-child at the heart of “Jeff, Who Lives at Home,” the comic drama by the independent film darlings Mark and Jay Duplass (“The Puffy Chair,” “Cyrus”). 

The eponymous Jeff does live at home, specifically in his mother’s basement, where he looks for signs on TV and in random telephone calls that will lead him off the couch to find his destiny. When his exasperated mother (played with feisty aplomb by Susan Sarandon) finally gets him out of the house to pursue a mundane household errand, Jeff resolutely follows what he perceives as “signs” (others would say, coincidences) that lead him on a series of misadventures around town. Along the way, he gets mugged, hooks up with his tool of a brother (Ed Helms), embarks upon a mission to see whether his sister-in-law is having an affair, and crosses paths with family members in the strangest of circumstances and locales. In the end, he proves to one and all that sometimes being true to your convictions, odd as they seem, can pay off on a universal scale.

Segel, a Hollywood A-lister at 32, may seem far removed from Jeff and his basement, but the actor sees similarities. “He reminds me of me during my out-of-work period,” the actor said. “There was a time, from 21 to 25, when I was very much like Jeff: I was smoking a ton of pot, and I’d been on [TV’s] ‘Freaks and Geeks,’ but now I was just sitting there, without a college education, so I thought I was going to have to live with my parents for the rest of my life. And I was just waiting for the ‘sign,’ which for me would have been to be cast in a movie; I was going on auditions, but nobody cared, because I was this gangly kid who looked like Shaggy from ‘Scooby Doo.’ ”

A terrific depression ensued: “There’s a context now, because I made ‘The Muppets,’ but back then I was just the dude alone in a one-bedroom apartment playing with my puppets,” he said. I’d talk to them and stuff — what about, you don’t want to know — deep, deep, sad conversations.” Worse, Segel said, he was in the process of writing a musical about Dracula — “without a sense of irony.”

If the fictional Jeff’s victory is the moment when everyone realizes that his ideas, in fact, are not daft, Segel had such a moment when he turned his Dracula musical into the finale of “Forgetting Sarah Marshall,” which was inspired by a true-life girlfriend who broke up with him while he was naked. The film made Segel a movie star. “But before it came out, I was terrified; I knew it had the weirdest ending to a movie of all time,” he said.

Nick Stoller has been Segel’s writing partner for years: “When you look in Jason’s eyes, he looks hurt, but he’s actually not a morose person,” Stoller said in a phone interview. “But he does have that quality where it’s hilarious to watch him suffer.”

Mark and Jay Duplass, who have lured movie stars such as Marisa Tomei to appear in their eccentric films, cast Segel as Jeff “because he has a magical quality that’s hard to find,” Mark said. His brother added, “Jason is a bit of a dreamer, a believer and an optimist. He has a childlike quality without an ounce of cynicism.”

Segel may be the most soulful of the Jewish comic-romantic leads, a list that also includes Ben Stiller and Paul Rudd, and for this he partly credits his childhood, which, like that of many comedians, had its share of strife. Segel’s father is Jewish, his mother is not, and while he was raised Jewish, he attended an Episcopal middle school, followed in the afternoons by Hebrew school at Kehillat Israel in Pacific Palisades.

“At Hebrew school they told me I’m not Jewish, because my mother is Christian, and at Christian school I was the only Jewish student, so they didn’t like me,” he recalled. “It was kids standing around me in a circle, jumping on my back and chanting, ‘Ride the oaf!’ ”

Then there was the matter of Segel’s bar mitzvah invitations: “I got called into the principal’s office, like I’d done something wrong, and he said, ‘Everyone is very excited about your little party, but they don’t know what a bar mitzvah is. Would you mind getting up in front of the school and explaining?” he recalled. “So there I was, standing in front of the assembly, voice cracking, puberty-ridden Jason Segel, croaking, ‘On Saturday, I become a man’ — and it literally direct-cut afterwards to me getting punched in the face.”

“It’s all right,” he added, when his interviewer looked shocked. “I’m no longer scared of being punched in the face.” The rejection on all sides caused him to realize, “This is not God speaking here,” and that came in handy when he had to man-up during that out-of-work period, and led to the decision that the only way a weird guy like him was going to get acting work was to write scripts for himself. He found a blueprint for how to structure screenplays in Campbell’s “The Hero With a Thousand Faces,” which posits that people are wired in a certain way to receive stories: “The hero must fail before he succeeds,” Segel said, by way of example.

His character will do just that — multiple times — in Segel’s next screenplay and starring vehicle, “The Five-Year Engagement,” which opens in April, in which he and Emily Blunt play a couple whose relationship is taxed when their nuptials are postponed. “I’m probably the least masculine man in Hollywood; I’m super interested in relationships,” he explained of the impetus for the film.

As he often does, Segel portrays a character who is nominally Jewish, and the interfaith clash with his fiancee makes for at least one hilarious moment, where his character’s family insists the men wear yarmulkes to the wedding. “You don’t even own a yarmulke,” Blunt protests, as Segel sheepishly replies, “It’s in my Jewish drawer.”

“I definitely have a Jewish drawer with my tallis and stuff in it, which I usually open once a year on the High Holidays,” he said. “But in terms of organized religion, I think the notion of ‘I know better than everyone else’ is wildly arrogant. I will just raise my own kids to be nice.” 

And with that he high-fives a reporter, shouting after her to “read ‘Hero With a Thousand Faces.’ It will rock your world.”

“Jeff, Who Lives at Home” opened March 16.

Segel’s starry-eyed man-child amuses and moves us Read More »

Survivor: Albert Rosa

Albert Rosa spied his older sister Luna across the chain-link fence. He remembered her as beautiful, with big, blue eyes and long, dark hair. Now she was skinny and filthy, her head shaved. “It broke my heart,” he said. Albert had been at Auschwitz only three weeks and had given up two days’ rations to persuade a bunkmate to trade uniforms and work details so he could see his sister. She was digging, supervised by female guards with guns, whips and German shepherds. He stood by the fence and got her attention. “Do you know anything about my children?” she asked him. “My husband? Mommy and Daddy?” A guard quickly appeared and clubbed Luna on the head. She fell, as blood gushed. The guard continued beating her.

Albert tried to rip the chain link apart, yelling the only words he knew in German, “Work faster, God-damned Jew.” The guard unleashed the German shepherd, commanding the dog to kill. As the dog charged his throat, Albert, a boxer in his native Greece, hit the dog with all his strength. They fought. Albert was mauled and, in his words, “left for three-quarters dead.” Still, he was ordered back to work. He later saw two women pulling a wooden cart. They picked up Luna’s body and threw it on top, “like trash,” Albert said.

Albert was born Jan. 25, 1925, in Salonika, Greece, to Ephraim, a hardware store owner, and Regina. The youngest of eight children in an observant and comfortable family, he excelled at swimming, soccer and boxing.

The situation for Salonika’s 56,000 Jews changed in April 1941, after Germany invaded Greece. Albert could no longer attend school, and his father’s business was confiscated. The persecution increased in February 1943, when the Jews were forced to wear yellow stars and relocate to ghettos.

A month later, in the early morning, Albert’s family and others were loaded into military trucks and then crammed into cattle cars, which over 10 days and nights transported them to Auschwitz. Albert spent the journey resting on a neighbor’s dead body. “We weren’t human anymore,” he said.

Arriving at Auschwitz, wearing only underwear and no shoes, Albert felt he had been put “in a deep freeze.” He was given number 110362 and a blanket and sent to a barracks with his older brothers Daniel and David. The next day, Albert was issued a uniform and sent to work in the coalmines, where he dug with a pick and shovel from sunup to sundown.

Later, after his sister’s murder, Albert was assigned to dig a pipe hole. At one point, seeing an open kitchen door, he grabbed a few potatoes. A guard saw him and started to shoot, but the gun jammed, so the guard began beating him with its butt, almost killing him. Albert’s brother Daniel, 6 feet tall and also a boxer, saw what was happening and, in Albert’s words, “came like a wild animal.” He knocked the guard out and choked him to death. Several guards intervened, cracking Daniel’s head and taking him away.  That evening at the nightly hanging, which other prisoners were forced to watch, Albert saw his brother Daniel on the gallows. “Daniel, I will survive, and I will avenge you,” he said.

In autumn 1943, months after the Warsaw Ghetto uprising, Albert and a large group of Greek Jews who spoke neither Polish nor Yiddish were transported to Warsaw to bury the dead, whose decomposing bodies were piled up in bunkers. At the end of the almost yearlong assignment, they were commanded to blow up the ghetto.

Afterward, Albert was part of a forced march from Warsaw to Dachau. He remembers that the group panicked when they reached a wide river, too deep to wade across. Soldiers stood on a small bridge, firing at them with machine guns as they tried to swim to safety.

Albert reached Dachau and was quickly transferred to Kaufering, a subcamp. One day, in January 1945, hearing they would be killed, he and seven prisoners escaped. Two were killed immediately, and Albert, running through the forest as fast as he could, said he “left part of my face and arms on the branches.” Eventually they reached a farmhouse, where, ravenous, they ate from the pigs’ trough. And when the elderly farmer, a one-legged German civilian, began shooting at them, they dove into a pile of fertilizer. American soldiers soon liberated them. They gave Albert a uniform, and he joined the Americans, doing medic runs as bullets rained down around him. For his service, he was awarded a Purple Heart.

After the war ended, in May 1945, Albert spent six months at the Feldafing displaced persons camp in Bavaria and another six months hunting down Nazis. In spring 1946, he joined the Irgun, the underground Jewish resistance group, recruiting refugees to help build Palestine. He also met his future wife, Betty Rosensweig, at the Riedenburg DP camp in Salzburg, Austria.  Soon after, he was imprisoned by the British in Cyprus for smuggling arms into Palestine, but managed to escape.

Albert and Betty married on Aug. 26, 1948, making their way to Denver in late 1949. Albert found a job as a janitor in an upholstery factory and worked his way up to factory manager. The family moved to Los Angeles in 1959. Here, Albert worked as an upholsterer and then, with a partner, ran a market and deli on Venice Beach for 20 years.

Albert’s daughter Regina was born in 1949,  son Andrew in 1953, and second daughter Yvette in 1964. Betty died in 1997. He has one granddaughter.

For 55 years, Albert didn’t talk about the Holocaust. But after seeing “Schindler’s List,” his daughters and son encouraged him to speak out, which he now does frequently.

“I want the schoolchildren to know that life wasn’t always so easy. When I was their age, I was starving,” he said.

Survivor: Albert Rosa Read More »

My Single Peeps: EG Daily

The first time I saw EG I was just starting to train at the Howard Fine Acting Studio.  She looked familiar, but I didn’t put it together immediately.  Then it clicked — Dottie!  From “Pee-wee’s Big Adventure”!  After we became friends and had worked together on various scenes for class, it was always hard for me to resist saying, “I’m a loner, Dottie.  A rebel.”  It still is.

Her family is European.  She’s one of five kids — one was born in France, another in Israel.  She was born in L.A.  “I was raised in a normal, middle-class neighborhood with kids.  We walked to school, whereas my kids now go to school in the Valley, so you have to drive.”

EG was more of a dancer and singer than an actor … “but I learned to be good at it.  And once I graduated high school, I started booking movies.  Lots of cult films.  Simultaneously did music, wrote songs and was on soundtracks.

“I was married maybe seven years — had two kids. [The ex and I] get along fine.  I love my girls.  I put a lot of attention on them — make sure my kids are priority.”

“What did you learn from divorce?” I ask.  She says, “You know that game — ‘Hot, hot, hot, you’re getting cold, cold, cold’ ”?  I nod, yes.  “It’s pretty simple.  If it feels good, it’s hot, hot, hot; if I want to get out, it’s cold, cold, cold.  How does it feel, is the big question.  I think when you’re with the right person, your life gets better.”

We talk about the difficulty in meeting men.  She’s now more known for voicing cartoon characters on projects like “Rugrats,” “Happy Feet” and “The Powerpuff Girls,” so her fans have changed.  “I started doing a lot of voiceover because I was being a mommy, so it sort of just worked itself out for me.  I was able to be there for [my kids], so voiceovers just blew up.  It was fun for them, too, to have the mommy who was the successful cartoon mommy.  I still have a lot of guys who are in love with me from ‘Pee-wee’s Big Adventure.’  I had to weed through a lot of people at that point.”

I ask her what kind of men she likes.  “I like funny, connected, kind and sensitive — not out of touch, [where] you don’t feel like you can share what you’re really feeling.  Someone who’s comfortable with himself and also works on himself and is growing.  Someone who brings to the party, rather than a taker.  Someone who’s your best friend, who you’re super attracted to.  That’s ideal.  And where you feel at home.  I always say, where you feel like you’re sitting in a warm bath.”

“How do you meet guys?” I ask.  “At my car.” I laugh.  “Seriously, I get notes on my car.”  “Do you respond to them?”  She doesn’t.  But I get the feeling she finds it flattering.  “Guys come over to me in stores, in a market, in the gym. … I was at a party and met someone I dated that way.  I don’t have a 9-to-5 job, so I meet people out.  I’ve dated other dads from the kids’ school.  It was cool.

“I’d say he should be between 40 and 55.  I’m in a different place now.  I feel like I’ve been out of the loop, because I’ve been raising children. … Some dating, but nothing serious.  But now I feel like there’s more of an opening for having a partner.  Because what else is there?  Printing up resumes, doing your auditions, but at the end of the day, what else is there besides companionship?”

If you’re interested in anyone you see on My Single Peeps, send an e-mail and a picture, including the person’s name in the subject line, to mysinglepeeps@jewishjournal.com, and we’ll forward it to your favorite peep.


Seth Menachem is an actor and writer living in Los Angeles with his wife and daughter. You can see more of his work on his Web site, sethmenachem.com, and meet even more single peeps at mysinglepeeps.com.

My Single Peeps: EG Daily Read More »

A place for being

Imagine, amid the detailed planning, frenzied gathering of precious objects, painstaking construction and growing sense of anticipation, Moses stands before the people and says, Enough! “Let no man or woman make further effort toward gifts for the sanctuary!” (Exodus 36:6).

I recently sat with two fifth-graders, discussing this seemingly odd directive. We discussed how Moses had previously called upon the Israelites to bring gifts for the construction of the tabernacle, but how in this week’s portion, Vayakhel-Pekudei, we learn that the Israelites were bringing too much. I asked the students why they thought Moses would tell the people to stop bringing gifts and one replied, “Maybe they brought so many gifts that there wasn’t any space left for God?”

This command to stop all donations comes on the heels of an altogether different building project. In last week’s parasha, the Israelites grew impatient with Moses’ time away on Mount Sinai and joined with Aaron in the misguided construction of the golden calf. In that episode, Aaron said to the Israelites, “Take off the gold rings that are on the ears of your wives, your sons, and your daughters, and bring them to me” (Exodus 32:2). The people did as he said.

When Moses lingered on the mountain, the Israelites donated jewelry to build an idol. When Moses told them to bring treasures to build the tabernacle, the Israelites gave until Moses said stop. Whether asked to give freely or by command, whether for purposes sinister or holy, the Israelites seem happy to oblige.

Under Pharaoh’s rule, the Israelites not only witnessed but also participated in the grand construction of monuments. They worked until Pharaoh said quit, they built what he designed, and they fulfilled the wishes he expressed. When it came time for the Israelites to contribute, they contributed without autonomy. For them, doing and building came as second nature. But, the Israelites built in order to build. They did in order to do. What they failed to experience was the deeper purpose of the construction, the intention behind the act.

Maybe they brought so many gifts that there wasn’t any space left for God?

Moses knew his people’s history. He had witnessed their labor as slaves and seen their construction of a useless idol well before he called upon them to stop their donations for the tabernacle. Maybe Moses came to fear that the Israelites were building the tabernacle in the same spirit that they built a golden calf for worship or erected a monument for their master?

But, the tabernacle was meant to be different.

The Hebrew word for tabernacle, mishkan, is constructed from the root letters shin-kaf-nun, meaning “dwell.” The tabernacle’s purpose was to be a dwelling place for God, not just a building project for humanity. The tabernacle was to be the antithesis of all that the Israelites had come to know and experience. The tabernacle was to be a space for being, not for doing.

Maybe they brought so many gifts that there wasn’t any space left for God?

The Israelites were so busy gathering gold and silver, crimson yarn and acacia wood, that they lost sight of the sacred purpose of their task. They were focused on the means, and missed the end.

In our lives today, we are not so different from our desert ancestors. We have our own edifices to keep us busy. Today, we too gather in our own individual pursuits, filling our moments with collections and constructions. We busy ourselves with our objects and our relationships, our worries and our passions, our aspirations and our failures. We may also find ourselves building in order to build, doing in order to do.

Maybe we are consumed by so much gathering that we fail to make space for the sacred?

Torah comes to remind us this week that life is not just about the building, but also about the being. This is a week for consciously making space. This is a week for considering the towers of activities and details and dealings that we pile around ourselves. This is a week for considering what we are using to fill our mental, emotional and spiritual wells. This is a week for clearing aside some of that stuff, which keeps us feeling full and occupied but also ultimately distracts us from that which is holy and meaningful.

Amid the detailed planning, frenzied gathering of precious objects, painstaking construction and growing sense of anticipation, Moses once again stands before his people and says, Enough!

Let us hear his call.


Rabbi Jocee Hudson is rabbi educator and religious school director at Temple Israel of Hollywood (tioh.org), a Reform congregation

A place for being Read More »

German opposition head rues referring to Hebron situation as ‘apartheid’

The leader of Germany’s main opposition party acknowledged that he may have gone too far when he wrote on Facebook that Israel is running an “apartheid regime” in Hebron.

Sigmar Gabriel, chairman of Germany’s Social Democratic Party, said Thursday that the choice of words he used on the social network the previous day had been “drastic.”

“But that is exactly how the Palestinians in Hebron experience the situation,” he said. “This drastic terminology came to mind for me, and not only for me, during our discussions and visits in Hebron.”

Gabriel’s original remarks following a visit to Hebron this week spread rapidly on the the social network.

“It’s a zone without legal rights for Palestinians,” he wrote. “It is an apartheid regime, and there’s no justification for it.”

Gabriel in Thursday’s comments said he never intended to compare Israel with the former regime in South Africa “because this comparison would be worse than unfair to Israel, and would also have the effect of downplaying” the crimes of the apartheid state.

His original statement came as Israel was reeling from a series of rocket attacks from Gaza. The comments elicited hundreds of impassioned responses attacking and supporting Gabriel, and prompted an outcry from political and Jewish leaders.

Stephan Kramer, general secretary of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, posted a response on his own Facebook site calling Gabriel’s comment “idiocy” that reflected poorly on his party.

While agreeing that the situation for some 180,000 Palestinians in Hebron is a “catastrophe” due to the actions of a “few hundred very, very radical settlers,” this does not amount to apartheid, Kramer said. “It’s a stupid comparison.”

Deidre Berger, head of the American Jewish Committee office in Berlin, told JTA that the comment “exceeds all acceptable boundaries to a critical discussion about Israel and compares one of Germany’s closest allies to a racist, nondemocratic state.”

The Jewish caucus of the Social Democratic Party also found Gabriel’s comments inappropriate. Gregor Wettberg, co-chair of the Berlin Brandenburg chapter of the caucus, said it was perfectly fair to criticize the situation for Palestinians in Hebron, which “is not in any way positive for the State of Israel or something that needs to be supported or defended by Jews or anyone.” But it is neither accurate nor wise to use the word apartheid, he said.

“We all know in Germany, and he should know it, too, that the term is used by certain kinds of people in a certain kind of way … to express their general dislike of Israel,” Wettberg said.

Gabriel should have thought twice before expressing his emotions via Facebook, he added.

German opposition head rues referring to Hebron situation as ‘apartheid’ Read More »