fbpx

February 2, 2012

BUDAPEST Vs. ???

The writer would like to apologize on her last article referring certain affairs in the Jewish community in Budapest.
I should never assume people have any other interest for running and/or attending events in the community, rather than their genuine aspiration for closeness.
If my words offended some individuals or organizations by implying that their motivation is different than the defined above, it was merely because I might mixed them with my own perspective. They say: “Ha possel B’mumo Possel”, which means: flaws you find in others are just a reflection to yourself.
As for myself, I was, not once, forgetting the essence of spontaneous togetherness in my own organization. I’ve sinned against my members dictating for them events that were not for them.
No real Hanuka event was discussed on this article, for sure not one of a specific organization. The article itself was not aimed to put a negative light on the Jewish community of Budapest- I got my best friend for life form this community. I’ll forever feel it’s my family and the origin for all that I am today.
Maybe, that is the reason I feel I could describe the atmosphere there when comparing it to what I have learnt in Szczecin.
When you love your house very much, you wish for its residence the best, sometimes you come out harsh.
Israelis should know this better than everyone else.

BUDAPEST Vs. ??? Read More »

Israel says Iran has material for four A-bombs

Israel estimated on Thursday that Iran could make four atomic bombs by further enriching uranium it has already stockpiled, and could produce its first within a year of deciding to build one.

But in his rare public remarks, Major-General Aviv Kochavi, chief of military intelligence, held out the possibility stronger international sanctions might dissuade Tehran from pursuing a policy he had no doubt was aimed at developing nuclear weapons, despite Iranian denials.

Citing figures similar to those from the U.N. nuclear agency, Kochavi told Israel’s annual Herzliya Conference on strategic affairs: “Iran has accumulated more than 4 tonnes of uranium enriched to a level of 3.5 percent and nearly 100 kilos at an enrichment level of 20 percent.

“This amount of material is already enough for four atomic bombs.”

Nuclear bombs require uranium enriched to 90 percent, but Western experts say much of the effort required to get there is already achieved once it reaches 20-percent purity, shortening the time needed for any nuclear weapons “break-out.”

One former U.N. inspector said last month Iran could have enough 20-percent uranium for one bomb – about 250 kg of the material – in about a year from now.

Tehran says it will use 20 percent-enriched uranium to convert into fuel for a research reactor making isotopes to treat cancer patients. Western officials say they doubt that the country has the technical capability to do that.

Referring to Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in whose country’s hands Israel believe a nuclear weapon would threaten the survival of the Jewish state, Kochavi said:

“From the moment Khamenei gives an order … to speed up production of the first nuclear explosive device, we estimate it will take about a year to complete the task.”

Arming a missile with a nuclear warhead, he added, could take a year or two longer.

Western experts’ estimates of how quickly Iran could assemble a nuclear weapon if it decides to do so range from as little as six months to a year or more. Some believe Iran hopes to develop nuclear technology but stop short of building weapons, a move from which it is barred by treaty commitments.

In a report in November, the United Nations’ International Atomic Energy Agency said Iran had almost 5 tonnes of low-enriched uranium and, citing data from September, 73.7 kg of uranium with a purity of 20 percent.

“Iran continues to contend that its program is for peaceful and civilian purposes,” Kochavi said.

“But a long series of solid, strong data in our hands prove beyond any doubt that Iran is continuing to engage in developing nuclear weapons,” he said in the speech, in which he steered clear of discussing Israel’s military options.

Israel, widely believed to possess the Middle East’s only nuclear arsenal, has said it would use force if necessary to prevent Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

It has made little comment on Iranian accusations that its agents, along with those of its Western allies, are behind assassinations and explosions that appear to form part of a covert war to sabotage Iran’s nuclear development capacity.

In separate remarks in Tel Aviv, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak said “we are in a period of diplomacy and sanctions” in trying to curb Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

“It is clear to all that there is no need to take any option off the table, that there needs to be intensive and urgent diplomacy and that sanctions on Iran need to include not only on oil but on the financial system and the central bank,” Barak told reporters.

Washington and the European Union have imposed tighter sanctions in recent weeks on both Iran’s oil exports and on international financial transactions with Tehran.

Kochavi said the current sanctions have not led to a change in Iranian strategy, but could still have an effect.

“But the stronger the (pressure), the greater the potential for the regime – which is worried first and foremost about its survival – to reconsider,” he said.

Tension between Iran and the West over Iran’s nuclear work has increased since November, when the IAEA published a report that said Tehran appeared to have worked on designing a nuclear weapon.

Iran says its nuclear energy program is peaceful and aimed at generating electricity and other civilian uses.

Editing by Alastair Macdonald

Israel says Iran has material for four A-bombs Read More »

Must Read, February 2, 2012

A dragon dance in the Negev

Writing for the Asia Times, veteran Indian diplomat M K Bhadrakumar examines China’s growing role in all parts of the Middle East, from the Gulf states to Iran to Israel.

“The great beauty is that all three Middle Eastern camps – Iran, the GCC and Israel – equally want the best of relationships with China and are manifestly vying with each other for the dragon’s prime time. This is going to pose an unsolvable riddle for other outside powers aspiring for influence in the region, be it the West or Turkey and Russia.”

A Third Option for Iran

Richard Haass, the president of the Council on Foreign Relations, believes that neither accepting a nuclear Iran nor launching a military strike is a viable option.

“I would be comfortable with putting forward a negotiating position at the same time we press ahead with increased economic sanctions, even as we prepare for military contingencies. We ought to move in every direction at the same time. We could also pursue other methods to frustrate the Iranian programs, say with computer viruses. “

Many Jewish GOP Donors Still on Sidelines

Allison Hoffman of Tablet takes a look at how prominent Jewish Republicans are spending their money in the GOP battle for the presidential nomination.

“Among Romney’s new supporters are hedge fund manager Paul Isaac, one of the 30 biggest individual donors to the Republican Party; Cheryl Halpern, a former backer of Gov. Rick Perry; and Hudson Institute board member Nina Rosenwald.”

The Christian right, alive and powerful

Peter Montgomery of AlterNet gives five good reasons why no one should write this highly political and highly religious group off just yet.

”…the increasing number of secular-minded Americans does not prevent the well-organized forces of the Religious Right from continuing to impact public policy, especially in areas of the country where they are strongest. This political and cultural movement will not be sinking beneath the horizon anytime soon.”

Hamas on the move, seeks Palestinian ascendancy

Nidal al-Mughrabi and Douglas Hamilton of Reuters look at the changing face of Hamas -Israel’s long-standing enemy and close ally of Iran – and what appears to be shaping up to be an internal leadership battle.

“This week, the two top men in the 25-year-old organization dedicated to crushing the Jewish state and establishing Palestine “from the (Jordan) river to the sea” headed off in distinctly different directions for high-level talks, and they began to look intriguingly like rivals.”

 

Must Read, February 2, 2012 Read More »

This week in power: Florida, Romney’s kashrut, Super Bowl, Israeli show

A roundup of the most talked about political and global stories in the Jewish world this week:

Romney’s Florida win
Mitt Romney gained a new head of steam with his win in the Florida primary on Tuesday thanks in part to the state’s large Jewish population. But hold up before accepting that as the sole reason, ” title=”http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2012/01/the-fight-for-floridas-jews.html” target=”_blank”>said Alex Koppelman at The New Yorker, since Jews everywhere tend to vote Democratic in general elections. That doesn’t stop Jews from investing heavily in the elections, though, ” title=”http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/romney_rapped_for_kosher_cut_UCfv1rYHxrr1CgIP2OPyRO” target=”_blank”>according to The New York Post. Newt Gingrich seized on it and pointed to Romney’s insensitivity to the Jewish people’s needs. “Mind you, for Gingrich’s last, desperate stand, it seemed a long shot that many Republican voters in Florida would care that in the course of cutting the Medicaid budget (something they of course love), some Jews in Massachusetts had to have kosher meals brought in rather than prepared in their nursing homes,” ” title=”http://www.ltlmagazine.com/blogs/patricia-sheehan/pork-gets-political-nursing-homes” target=”_blank”>said Patricia Sheehan at Long-Term Living.

‘New Jews’
Freedom Party leader Heinz-Christian Strache of Vienna is ” title=”http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/europe/120130/austria-right-wing-ball-holocaust-day-Heinz-Christian-Strache” target=”_blank”>the Global Post reported. Officials are urging Stache to apologize for his remarks.

Super Bowl Sunday
Who should you root for on football’s biggest night? This year’s teams have some ” title=”http://www.jewishjournal.com/sports/article/jews_in_super_bowl_history_20120131/” target=”_blank”>footsteps of the past. Both teams’ owners give you ” title=”http://www.njjewishnews.com/article/8139/jews-for-giants#.TyoWvMVrPZd” target=”_blank”>joked Ron Kaplan in the New Jersey Jewish News.

Prime minister show
The granddaughter of the late Yitzhak Rabin is the creator of a new Israeli show called “The Prime Minister’s Children.” ““The most interesting thing about being the daughter or son of a prime minister is the price you pay, willingly. In a normal family, in your teens, your mission is to rebel, but here, at that crucial stage, you defend your father. In politics you are a soldier of a political camp, and above all you are loyal,” ” title=”http://www.thejewishweek.com/blogs/well_versed/huh_israeli_west_wing” target=”_blank”>said The Jewish Week’s Eric Herschthal. “The fictional P.M. the show follows is a right-wing conservative, worried about his own political survival above all.” A far cry from reality.

This week in power: Florida, Romney’s kashrut, Super Bowl, Israeli show Read More »

Shabbat dinner from the Davos World Economic Forum

In recent years, ” title=”thoughts from the dinner in 2010″ target=”_blank”>thoughts from the 2010 dinner appeared on wowowow and were excerpted on this blog.

Before she left for Davos last week, Liz offered to write The God Blog from become an annual Shabbat dinner. My questions are in bold:

Why do a Shabbat in Davos? Is this about breaking bread with those attending or about observing the Sabbath?

It’s a little of both.  The World Economic Forum is like a gigantic magnet that pulls in world leaders and business people from around the globe to this tiny Swiss Alpine ski village. At some point, someone must have looked around and said, “My goodness, an important number of people here are Jewish. Let’s give them a place not only to mark Shabbat but to meet and schmooze.”

Who is at this year’s Davos Shabbat dinner?

Everywhere you turned, there was someone who’s got an important and pivotal role in either business, politics or both.

Israel’s president Shimon Peres and Minister of Finance Ehud Barak were the star guests. Israel’s Central Bank Governor Stanley Fischer, JP Morgan Chase International Chairman Jacob Frankel, U.S. Undersecretary of State Bob Hormats, Council on Foreign Relations President Richard Haass, Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg, Bank Hapoalim Chairman Yair Seroussi, Warren Buffett’s grandson Howard Buffett Jr., Fortune’s Adam Lashinsky, Nobel Prize winners Astrophysicist Saul Perlmutter and Biologist Bob Horvitz,  billionaire investor Jeff Greene, Henry Schein CEO Stan Bergman, the list goes on.

Who took a surprising role in dinner?

Randi Zuckerberg, the sister of Facebook Founder Mark Zuckerberg. She’s an amazing singer and led us all in “Shalom Alechem.” It was very emotional. There we all were at the Hotel Seehof singing at the top of our lungs in a country that hadn’t exactly extended real help to the Jews during World War II. Definitely an important moment and real affirmation of our resilience.

Davos this year has not been without Occupy protestors. How has that affected the tone of the conference? The dinner?

One of the first things my crew and I did upon arrival was to head over to the Occupy Davos location. The protestors were building igloos and I felt we as journalists should take a look. The mandate of the World Economic Forum is to “solve the world’s problems.”

One issue on a lot of participants’ plates was fixing the income inequality gap, a big Occupy complaint. We got there and found 3 guys slicing ice blocks. We talked to them. They are still angry at the banks. As one protestor put it, “They got bailed out when they got into trouble. So many of us lost our jobs because of their mistakes. Where’s our bailout?”.  They told me they were hoping for more people to amass but Davos is a 2 and a half hour winding drive from Zurich. Even with only 3 people there, it was a topic of conversation at dinner.

Ehud Barak brought up Israeli’s complaints about high inflation and unemployment, saying this was equally if not more important than Occupy Wall Street to discuss. Israel, he asserted, needs to be stronger than ever to face the always present threat Arab nations and Iran pose. “Let me remind you of a Jewish saying,” he said with a smile. “Be healthy because troubles will never be in short supply.”

Shabbat dinner from the Davos World Economic Forum Read More »

Calendar Picks and Clicks: February 3

Pick of the week: Wed., Feb. 8:

JERRY LEWIS
The 85-year-old comedy icon signs DVD copies of “The Jazz Singer,” the 1959 television remake that features Lewis as Joey Rabinowitz, a nightclub singer torn between show business and his faith. Wristbands will be distributed at 9 a.m., and Lewis will only sign copies of “The Jazz Singer.” Wed. 6-7 p.m. Barnes & Noble at the Grove, 189 Grove Drive, Suite K 30, Los Angeles. (323) 525-0270. barnesandnoble.com



WED | FEB 1

“JUDAISM AND THE IPAD GENERATION”
Rabbi Sharon Brous of IKAR leads today’s conversation, a response to radical discontinuity and spiritual disorientation in the Jewish community. She offers her take on how Judaism can be translated for the next generation. Wed. 7:30 p.m. $8 (Sinai Temple members), $16 (general). Sinai Temple, 10400 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles. (310) 481-3243. sinaitemple.org.


SAT | FEB 4

SHABBAT SHIRA CONCERT
Pasadena Jewish Temple & Center hosts a night of Hebrew, Yiddish, Ladino and Israeli music featuring Argentine Cantors Ruth Berman Harris and Diego Rubinsztein. Child care available for ages 5-10. Co-sponsored by the PJTC Sisterhood and the Adult Education Committee. Sat. 6 p.m. (pizza dinner), 6:45 p.m. (Havdalah), 7 p.m. (concert). $5 (dinner), $10 (suggested donation for concert). Pasadena Jewish Temple & Center, 1434 N. Altadena Drive, Pasadena. (626) 798-1161. pjtc.net.

‘BIG LEBOWSKI’ FILM FESTIVAL
Throw on your favorite bathrobe or bowling shirt and pull up a couch to watch the Coen brothers’ L.A. noir comedy, featuring The Dude and Walter “I don’t roll on Shabbos!” Sobchak. JWood, Temple Israel of Hollywood’s young adult group, hosts the screening, which includes food, drinks (BYOB) and table games. Proceeds benefit the charitable works of Temple Israel. Sat. 7 p.m. $18. Temple Israel of Hollywood, 7300 Hollywood Blvd., Los Angeles. (323) 876-8330. www.tioh.org.


SUN | FEB 5

WHAT’S COOKING WITH HADASSAH
Hadassah Southern California kicks off its 100th anniversary celebration on Super Bowl Sunday with an Italian cooking demonstration, tasting and storytelling by Judy Zeidler, renowned restaurateur, chef and cookbook author. Zeidler signs copies of her latest cookbook, “Italy Cooks,” which contains recipes from the Tuscan countryside, Piedmont, Florence and Umbria. Sun. 11 a.m. $40 (reservations required). Skirball Cultural Center, 2701 N. Sepulveda Blvd., Los Angeles. (310) 234-8300. southerncalifornia.hadassah.org.


Tue | FEB 7

‘In Darkness’ sneak preview
The Los Angeles Jewish Film Festival and The Jewish Journal host a free screening of Agnieszka Holland’s Oscar-nominated Holocaust drama “In Darkness.” Discussion with Holocaust scholar Michael Berenbaum and Journal Arts & Entertainment Editor Naomi Pfefferman follows. Tue. 7:30 p.m. Free (RSVP required). Laemmle Town Center 5, 17200 Ventura Blvd., Encino. To RSVP, visit brownpapertickets.com/event/224629.


THU | FEB 9

“JUSTICE ILLUMINATED: THE ART OF ARTHUR SZYK”
Opening today, this new exhibition introduces viewers to the life and art of Szyk, a Polish-born illustrator and caricaturist who used art to fight fascism during World War II. Described by Eleanor Roosevelt as “a one-man army,” Szyk focused on three themes in his work: World War II, America and the Jewish response. Co-sponsored by the UCLA Center for Jewish Studies and Hillel at UCLA. Thu. 4-6:30 p.m. Free. Dortort Gallery and Spiegel Auditorium, Third Floor, Hillel at UCLA, 574 Hilgard Ave., Los Angeles. (310) 208-3081. ucla.hillel.org

“MISS REPRESENTATION”
Writer-director Jennifer Siebel Newsom, wife of Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, denounces the media’s portrayal of women in this 2011 documentary. Blending portrayals of teen girls and interviews with figures like Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Gloria Steinem and Rachel Maddow, Newsom argues that the mainstream media’s focus on women’s youth, beauty and sexuality contributes to the under-representation of women as leaders. A selection at the 2011 Sundance Film Festival, “Miss Representation” was featured on the Oprah Winfrey Network. A panel discussion follows the screening. Sponsored by Z’havah Valley Beth Shalom Young Sisterhood. Thu. 7-10 p.m. $18. Valley Beth Shalom, 15739 Ventura Blvd., Encino. (818) 788-6000. vbs.org.

JAY MICHAELSON
Zeek magazine’s founding editor and Forward contributing editor discusses and reads from his latest book, “God vs. Gay? The Religious Case for Equality,” which debunks the idea that Scripture is anti-gay and argues that religious people should support equality for gays and lesbians not despite their religion, but because of it. Beth Chayim Chadashim and IKAR co-sponsor. Thu. 7:30-9 p.m. Free. Beth Chayim Chadashim, 6090 W. Pico Blvd., Los Angeles. (323) 931-7023. bcc-la.org.


FRI | FEB 10

“NEW JERUSALEM”
Follow the excommunication proceedings of Baruch de Spinoza, the 17th century philosopher who alienated himself from his fellow Dutch Jews. Spinoza’s ideas are the center of the debate in “New Jerusalem, The Interrogation of Baruch de Spinoza at Talmud Torah Congregation: Amsterdam, July 27, 1656,” a play by David Ives (“Venus in Fur”). The West Coast Jewish Theatre presents the West Coast premiere. Fri. Through April 1. 8 p.m. $30 (adults), $28 (seniors), $20 (students). Pico Playhouse, 10508 Pico Blvd., Los Angeles. (323) 860-6620. westcoastjewishtheatre.org.

Calendar Picks and Clicks: February 3 Read More »

Discordant disappointment

Parashat Beshallah is a symphony beautifully played, until the orchestra flubs the finale. It is a prima donna nailing the high note of the aria, just to blow out her voice three bars before the close.

The parasha certainly starts with high grandeur and suspense. B’nai Yisrael are pinned by Pharoah’s army against the Sea of Reeds. Only a wall of fire — the presence of the Holy One — stands between them and certain death. Moses raises his staff, the sea splits, Egyptians are drowned, Israelites are saved. What resulted was the spontaneous singing of the Song of the Sea — a poem of gratitude, victory, exultation and thanks — that we recite every morning during davening. Miriam and the women break out timbrels; dancing and singing ensue.

It’s good, heady stuff, Charlton Heston-worthy.

But what immediately follows is as discordant as a narrative can be.

“[The Israelites] went into the wilderness of Shur; they traveled three days in the wilderness and found no water. They came to Marah, but they could not drink the water of Marah because it was bitter. … And the people grumbled against Moses, saying, “What shall we drink … .” (Exodus 15:22-24).

One is tempted to be frustrated with the Torah, for tacking the need to find a water fountain onto the grand splitting of the sea seems so, well, tacky.

However, like anything of worth, wisdom is to be found at second glance. The juxtaposition of magnificence and the pedestrian is intentional. This, for example, is how the legendary Abraham Joshua Heschel understood Parashat Beshallah in the context of civil rights:

“This episode seems shocking. What a comedown! Only three days earlier they had reached the highest peak of prophetic and spiritual exaltation, and now they complain about such a prosaic and unspiritual item as water. … The Negroes of America behave just like the children of Israel. Only in 1963 they experienced the miracle of having turned the tide of history, the joy of finding millions of Americans involved in the struggle for civil rights, the exaltation of fellowship, the March to Washington. Now only a few months later they have the audacity to murmur: ‘What shall we drink? We want adequate education, decent housing, proper employment.’ How ordinary, how unpoetic, how annoying!”

To be fair to the reader, know that it took me a few times through to understand that Heschel is being sarcastic. Of course the demands by African-Americans in the ’60s were valid. Of course they should not have been content with the magnificence of Martin Luther King Jr. speaking his dream on the Mall, when real, practicable change had not been addressed. Of course it was appropriate for B’nai Yisrael to ask how they were to survive without clean water.

The blatting of the final notes of Beshallah is, then, a planned thing: The parashah is meant to flop at the end, and the purpose of this choreography is to remind us of the insufficiency of spectacle.

You and I know that human beings have a weakness for spectacle. All of us love a good show, and we are built such that it is possible to be convinced that real work has been accomplished if enough razzle-dazzle is pointed in our direction. The issue with fiery speeches, star-studded celebrity benefits (see Jon Stewart’s tongue-in-cheek “Night of Too Many Stars”), conferences to address social ills and political conventions is that they are only moments of promise and inspiration. They do not themselves effect change, address basic needs, change policy and lift oppression.

This is the Torah’s message: Even pure salvation, as we experienced at the Sea of Reeds, can be pure spectacle. We are to be suspicious of song and dance. We should judge our communal endeavors by the extent to which they affect real people, after the sound and fury have subsided.

Ultimately, I believe this is a lens we should turn on our own Jewish communities. It is upon us to ask ourselves, to what extent do we fulfill the ideals we state? If we believe in inspiring prayer, do we achieve it? If we want connection to Israel, do we pursue it? If we believe that Torah pushes us to help those who need help most, do we effect this sacred charge?

Once upon a time we were not content with miracles, and expected God’s word to help us make real life livable. May it always
be so.

Scott Perlo is the rabbi of Adat Shalom (adatshalomla.org), a Conservative congregation in West Los Angeles, and a founder of Ma’or, a new way for Jews of all backgrounds in Los Angeles to take hold of learning Torah.

Discordant disappointment Read More »

Hernias difficult to diagnose in women

Martine Ehrenclou, 51, first noticed her lower abdomen pain in January 2010. She experienced severe discomfort if she sat at her desk for even 15 minutes, when she drove her car or any time that she pitched forward. Ehrenclou, who lives in Brentwood, describes the pain as “brutal.”

“I would have stabbing, sharp pain right in the center of where my C[aesarean]-section scar is,” she said. “It would start right above the scar, and it felt like it went very deep internally, and once that would happen, it would kick off a spasm that would radiate to every part of my pelvic area.”

Eventually, she said, the spasms happened every day, and she finally visited her doctor. But instead of a straightforward diagnosis, the visit marked the beginning of what would prove to be a year-and-a-half-long search for a cure.

“I saw 12 doctors of differing specialties, I underwent 15 tests and procedures, and I was put on 22 medications,” Ehrenclou said of the grueling road to a diagnosis.

It wasn’t until reading a newspaper article that Ehrenclou finally realized what she might have: a hernia. “I could not believe what I was reading,” she said; the complications that the woman in the article described matched Ehrenclou’s almost precisely.

Armed with this new information, Ehrenclou made an appointment with Dr. Shirin Towfigh, a surgeon at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center who specializes in treating women with hernias. After performing an MRI, Towfigh gave Ehrenclou the final verdict: two small belly button hernias and another one protruding through a muscle tear at the site of her C-section. One was pinching a nerve, likely causing the majority of Ehrenclou’s excruciating pain.

Towfigh performed a simple surgery on Ehrenclou, which, she said, is the only surefire way to treat a hernia. Within a few days, Ehrenclou was back on her feet, feeling “elated and grateful” that the pain she had been living with for so long was finally gone.

But unfortunately, Ehrenclou’s story is not uncommon.

Hernias, which occur when part of an internal organ or fatty tissue pushes through a hole in a muscle, are far more common in men than in women. As a result, many doctors don’t consider a hernia diagnosis when faced with a female patient.

“Hernias in women are not on the radar for most doctors,” Towfigh said, “and so many don’t ask the right questions to narrow it down.”

Adding to the problem, the most common type of hernia is in the groin area, and their symptoms mirror other pelvic problems that tend to plague women.

“Women have many more organs in that region than men do,” Towfigh said. “So when they come in with lower groin pain, it’s often mistaken for pelvic pain.”

Women with hernias may be misdiagnosed as having ovary-related problems, such as cysts or ruptures; complications from prior pelvic surgeries, such as Caesarean sections; endometriosis; or fibroids.

In Ehrenclou’s case, her incorrect diagnoses included interstitial cystitis, fibroids and neuropathy. But worse than the frustration of not knowing what was wrong, she said, were the invasive and sometimes painful tests and treatments she endured in the name of the wrong problem.

One such treatment involved painful steroid injections to her pelvic area. Another required her to be put under general anesthesia, injected with needles in her lower back, and then brought out of the anesthesia to have them electronically stimulated in order to isolate the origination point of the pain. 

“All these doctors did not have hernia in their purview,” she said.

Adding to the difficulty of diagnosing hernias in women, Towfigh says, is that they are often smaller than those seen in men. When a man with a hernia lies down, for instance, the hernia can generally be seen in the form of a bulge. But because of the differences in women’s bodies, a hernia may not be as prominent or even visible at all.

“Women’s pelvises are broader, and so the distribution where the hernias occur and how they present is a little different,” Towfigh said. “In men it protrudes, but in women it’s not as large, so it’s not commonly felt as a bulge.”

Because of the likelihood of confusion and misdiagnoses, Towfigh adds that the more information a patient has and the more forthcoming the patient is with that information, the more easily the diagnosis can be made. With Ehrenclou, for instance, her symptoms lined up clearly with those of hernia.

“Women will commonly tell you that they’re doing daily activities, like washing dishes or brushing their teeth, and it hurts them,” Towfigh said, “or anything that closes off that area, like coughing, sneezing or bending over.”

For her part, Ehrenclou encourages other women in her situation to be tenacious in seeking a cure. As difficult as it was, she says, she never stopped pushing for a diagnosis. If she had given up halfway through, “I probably would still be in pain.”

Hernias difficult to diagnose in women Read More »

Himmler: An ordinary man turned villain

No matter how much is written about Nazi Germany, there is always some new horror to behold and some new paradox to ponder. That’s how I felt when I opened a remarkable and wholly fascinating new book by Peter Longerich, a German historian who is among the world’s leading scholars of the Holocaust and the Third Reich.

At more than 1,000 pages, “Heinrich Himmler” (Oxford University Press: $34.95), translated from German by Jeremy Noakes and Lesley Sharpe, is now the benchmark of scholarship on the man who has been deservedly called the architect of the Holocaust. Longerich’s announced goal is “to penetrate as far as possible the mystery of this man’s personality and the motives underlying his monstrous deeds,” and he is entirely successful in doing so. 

Longerich makes the point that Himmler was both an ordinary German and an arch-villain. On the day of his arrest by Allied officers in 1945, Himmler appeared to be “a fairly short, ill-looking man in shabby civilian clothing,” and his unimposing presentation was nothing new. He had always been embarrassed by his weak chin and sought to cover it with his hand when being photographed, and his weak eyes forced him to wear spectacles (or a pince-nez) throughout his life.

Trained to enter the field of agriculture, young Himmler aspired to manage an estate but failed to find a job. Fatefully, the frustrated young man took advantage of the opportunities offered by the Nazi rise to power in the 1930s to reinvent himself as a political activist. The ambitious young Himmler was appointed to the command of Hitler’s personal bodyguards, the Schutzstaffel, and ultimately succeeded in turning the SS, as it was known, into nothing less than a Nazi cult, as well as a fighting force that rivaled the Wehrmacht and an industrial-scale enterprise whose function was genocide.

Himmler started out as a bespectacled young man who took a dancing class “to overcome his initial clumsiness,” and he “had little success in his relationships with women.” From a close reading of Himmler’s diaries, Longerich detects the theme that reflected his anxieties and shaped his destiny — “[t]he repression of the subject of sexuality through the invocation of masculinity, heroism and violence, and his self-imposed conviction that, predestined to be a solitary fighter and hero, he could not enter into any emotional commitments.”

So it was that the SS embodied Himmler’s own “predilections, aversions and diverse quirks.” Unlike the rival Brownshirts, a Nazi paramilitary organization that tolerated homosexuality in its ranks, the SS man was expected to marry an Aryan woman “and through his marriage to contribute to the improvements of the ‘racial quality’ of the German people.” He railed against the Freemasons with as much venom as he directed at the Jews, and yet he displayed a curious sympathy for “the martyred and tortured bodies of mothers and girls of our nation burnt into ashes as a result of the witch trials.” Abortion was another one of his obsessions: “I have asked myself the question,” he declared in a speech in 1937, “[I]s this the reason why our nation is so morally debased and bad?”

Of course, Longerich goes into great detail in his account of Himmler’s life, and he devotes much attention to the internal politics of the Nazi regime and the bureaucratic maze through which it operated. Thus, for example, I discovered for the first time in a lifetime of reading on this subject that there was a Prussian police unit known as the Gestapa, as well as the more familiar Gestapo, and Longerich explains how this distinction figures in the rivalry between Himmler and Goering.

But the centerpiece of the book is, inevitably, Himmler’s role in designing, building and operating the machinery of mass murder that we call the Holocaust. From the outset, Himmler was the mastermind of the dreaded concentration camp system, which he loved to visit in person, and he saw in the so-called Final Solution an opportunity to put into practice “his utopian ideas of a new order in the east.” Ominously, Himmler turned his attention in 1941 to the role his men would play during the invasion of the Soviet Union — the police battalions, the Einsatzgruppen and the Waffen-SS — and the “special tasks I shall give them.”

Those “special tasks,” of course, consisted of the shooting of Jewish men, women, children and babies during the opening days of the invasion of the Soviet Union. Not long afterward, Himmler put the concentration camp system in service to the same genocidal goal, and he established a series of new camps, including the notorious camp at Auschwitz, that were purpose-built for mass murder by poison gas. His motive? “[T]o find a method of killing,” explains Longerich, “that exposed his men to less stress than the massacres.”

Longerich charges Himmler and his cronies in the Nazi regime with a crucial role in the escalation of violence against the Jewish people in 1941. But he refuses to exonerate Hitler: “Himmler could rest assured that any initiative to radicalize anti-Jewish policy would be favorably received by his ‘Führer,’ ” writes Longerich. “The extension of the mass executions in the Soviet Union was not a case of Himmler acting independently, but rather an anticipation of what Hitler had in any case planned for the period after the war: the physical extermination of the Jews, whatever form that might take.”

Himmler assured the officers who served him that he was “not a man who enjoys or takes pleasure in having to do something harsh,” but he also congratulated himself on having “sufficiently strong nerves and a sufficiently strong sense of duty” to carry out the tasks that he considered to be “necessary.” The moral burden of Longerich’s brilliant and important book is that Himmler was not a demon plucked from hell and set among ordinary men, but an ordinary man — weak-chinned but strong-willed — who lived at a time and in a place where the demoniacal visions that filled his head were elevated from a private madness into state policy.

Jonathan Kirsch, author and publishing attorney, is book editor of The Jewish Journal. He blogs on books at jewishjournal.com/twelvetwelve and can be reached at books@jewishjournal.com.

Himmler: An ordinary man turned villain Read More »