fbpx

April 1, 2011

Eat Right for Your Belt Size, Not Your Blood Type

Every couple of months I get asked this same question.

“Doc, what’s my blood type?”

I load my “why you don’t need to know your blood type” speech from my cerebrum and press replay, trying to add a little spontaneous variation for authenticity.

“Actually, I’ve never checked it.”

“I thought you check everything.”

“Nobody checks everything. There are thousands of different available blood tests. Most of them would be completely useless to you.”

“Well doc, could you check my blood type?”

“I’m happy to, but unless a surgeon asked you to have it checked in anticipation of a surgery, it’s really not a handy thing to know.”

“Really? What if I get hit by a truck and need a transfusion?”

“If you ever need a transfusion and tell them your blood type, they won’t believe you. They’ll check it again.”

“But I need to know it because I heard about this great diet…”

Oh, no! Another trusting soul nearly lost in the sticky swamp of quackery. In 1996 a naturopathic doctor published “Eat Right 4 Your Type” a book claiming that your blood type determines your ideal diet. If you want the physiologic details of why this connection between diet and blood type is complete nonsense, check out the links below, especially the detailed and scathing book review from Quackwatch. (By the way, Quackwatch is a terrific resource for sorting the scams from the truth in medicine.)

But forget the physiology. This link between optimal diet and blood type would be very easy to prove without knowing any physiology. You would just take a large group of overweight adults, check their blood types and randomize them into two groups. Group 1 would be assigned the diet appropriate for their blood type according to the book. Group 2 would be assigned a diet suggested by the book for some other blood type. If group 1 lost significantly more weight than group 2 you would have convincing proof that the book isn’t a pile of rubbish. That trial has never been done, though the book has been republished several times. So it makes claims that make no physiologic sense and are unproven.

So why do people fall for it? Because the diets suggested for each blood type are fairly reasonable. Any one of the four diets is fairly healthy and could lead to weight loss, but you can pick one of the four at random; they have nothing to do with blood type. So (just like with bogus cold remedies) people try it, get good results, and spread the word.

“Well, thanks, doc! Sounds like I should just eat less and maybe crank up the exercise a couple of notches.”

“You’re very welcome. By the way, there is a beautiful way to find out your blood type and save a life – donate blood.”

Thus, quackery is foiled again, and there is much rejoicing!

Learn more:

Quackwatch book review: ” target=”_blank”>Blood type diet

WebMD article: ” target=”_blank”>The Cedars-Sinai blood donor facility

Public Service Announcement: Eat Right for Your Belt Size, Not Your Blood Type Read More »

Feds investigate Madonna’s Kabbalah Centre for Malawi scandal

No stranger to controversy or community contemptuousness, the iconic Kabbalah Centre is once again finding itself in hot water.

Several days ago, reports surfaced on the internet that a new spate of lawsuits and an IRS investigation are targeting the Kabbalah Centre, the Kabbalah Learning Centre and several members of the Berg family, the center’s founders and leaders. 

According to the entertainment Website showbiz411:

  Courtenay Geddes, a wealthy heiress from Pasadena, California, has sued the Kabbalah Centre of Los Angeles and all of its entities alleging a major swindle. Geddes’s suit — for $20 million– was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court in February 2011. The news of the lawsuit comes on top of headlines concerning Kabbalah’s Raising Malawi charity reneging on a promise to build a girls academy in Malawi with pop star Madonna. As I reported exclusively yesterday, the Kabbalah Centre and Madonna have now hired a top spin doctor, Mark Fabiani, to protect the image of the singer and the organization.

  Geddes didn’t name Madonna as a defendant in her suit, but she named everyone else from the Berg family to John Larkin of Larkin Business Management. Larkin is the accountant for Kabbalah. (His firm was sued in 2009 by the Black Eyed Peas for failing to file a decade’s worth of tax returns.)

Also under investigation is the Madonna-backed charity Raising Malawi, which I first reported on in April 2009 when a FOX News report suggested that millions of dollars earmarked for Raising Malawi, the Kabbalah Centre’s official charity arm, had disappeared.

The report centered around a 2008 New York City fundraiser hosted by Madonna and co-sponsored by The Gucci Foundation and UNICEF, which reportedly raised $3.7 million for Raising Malawi. According to reports, the funds were earmarked for a school project that would teach spirituality to Malawi orphans, but a year later, no progress had been made and the $3.7 million remained unaccounted for.

The report also questioned why the Malawi government had initially rejected Madonna’s request to adopt a second child from that country (they eventually acquiesced). Was it an act of retaliation? A hint of bad blood between the government and the pop star?

As Jewish Journal editor Rob Eshman wrote on bloggish, “From it[s] inception Kabbalah Learning Center has been a frequent target of lawsuits, rumors, publicity good and bad, and controversy.”

From a 1997 story on the Kabbalah Learning Center, Eshman wrote:

That a Jewish institution has met with such success would—or should—normally be the cause of much rejoicing in the Jewish community. But if a golden touch blesses the center, a cloud of rumors, investigations, lawsuits and exposés shadows it. “What they’ve done is taken Kabbalah and twisted it out of shape for their own purposes, and it’s very destructive,” said Congregation Neve Shalom’s Rabbi Steven Robbins, founder of the Jewish Federation Council of Greater Los Angeles’ Cult Task Force. “This is not Judaism. This is not kabbalah. This is narshkeit [nonsense].”

But supporters hail the KLC as a salve for all the ills of the modern soul. The center survives on and solicits contributions like any synagogue, they say. And adherents are no more loyal than Chassids are to their rebbes. Said Michael Berg, the son of the center’s founder, Rabbi Philip Berg: “We teach kabbalah; we wear white on Shabbat. Is it a cult or is it a group that is different from what you’re used to?”

Like Scientology, whose practices are shrouded in secrecy and have aroused public suspicion, the Kabbalah Centre attracts celebrities who are struggling to make sense of their lives. Madonna, for instance, didn’t wind up there because she felt fulfilled and stable on her pop-music pedestal, but because she was questioning her values, selfish behaviors and seeking deeper meaning. Listen to her 1999 album “Ray of Light” and you’ll hear the center’s diluted version of Kabbalah in nearly every lyric.

As Eshman notes in his story, there are several main criticisms of the center’s methods:

Sore points for the critics include:

* “Scanning,” a KLC practice that means looking over the pages of the Zohar, the five-volume central kabbalah text, even though some can’t read the Hebrew it’s written in. “The Hebrew words are channels through which light is transmitted,” said Michael Berg.

“It’s like an Evelyn Wood thing,” said the Chai Center’s Rabbi Schwartz. “This is so anti-intellectual, and we are the People of the Book.”

* Teaching that the victims of the Nazi Holocaust chose or provoked their fate. Inflammatory as this subject may be, the conclusion is inevitable considering the center’s approach to kabbalah. “We should all remember this,” wrote Karen Berg in a recent issue of Kabbalah, the KLC’s magazine. “If it happens to me, I must deserve it.”

“If you look at it in the big picture, the Jews were, in some way, the cause,” said Michael Berg. The KLC’s promotional video, “The Power of Kabbalah,” states that Ashkenazic Jews were slaughtered and Sephardic Jews were saved because only the latter studied kabbalah. “That’s ridiculous,” said Dr. Alex Grobman, national director of the American Society of Yad Vashem. “The Sephardim were simply not in the Nazi’s line of fire.”

* The lack of traditional Jewish instruction. “Real kabbalists were also Talmudic scholars,” said a local Orthodox rabbi. “People can’t have a full spiritual experience without putting in the work.”

The Orthodox particularly abhor the KLC’s non-halachic approach to Jewish learning. “They’ll sell you a Zohar before they sell you a mezuzah,” said Schwartz.

But most KLC participants, said Eitan Yardeni, a senior teacher at the Los Angeles center, have “never been involved” in Jewish learning. For them, learning observance is secondary to learning spirituality and kabbalah.

* Teaching love, preaching intolerance. Rabbi Berg emphasizes the importance of “causeless love” among Jews. But at least one public utterance seems to fall short of that. At one Shabbat service, which The Jewish Journal attended, Berg, who was in town, sermonized that rabbis who oppose the center “don’t want you to know the truth. They want you to live in chaos. They are the enemies of enlightenment.”

According to the article, Dr. Rabbi Philip Berg has repeatedly refused over the years to disclose the source or official credentials of his doctorate.

More than a decade later, and as evidenced by Geddes’ the newly filed lawsuit, the Kabbalah Centre continues to attract major donations in support of its services. But where the money goes and why one-time supporters of the center become disillusioned and angry remains enshrouded in mystery. 

—-

Read more on the Kabbalah Centre

Madonna’s Kabbalah-backed fundraiser missing millions

L.A.‘s Kabbalah Learning Center: Center of Controversy

Maybe It’s Not So Weird After All

Feds investigate Madonna’s Kabbalah Centre for Malawi scandal Read More »

U.S.: Violence isn’t the answer to grievances of Syrian people

The White House on Friday condemned Syria’s violent crackdown on anti-government protesters and urged Syrian President Bashar Assad to promptly take concrete steps toward meaningful reform.

“The Syrian government has an important opportunity to be responsive to the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people,” Jay Carney, spokesman for U.S. President Barack Obama, said in a statement. “Violence is not the answer to the grievances of the Syrian people.”

Assad announced limited steps toward reform this week, saying he was forming committees to look into civilian deaths and the possibility of replacing Syria’s despised emergency laws. At least 75 people have been killed in two weeks of demonstrations, including three on Friday.

Read more at Haaretz.com.

U.S.: Violence isn’t the answer to grievances of Syrian people Read More »

Jay Sanderson pushes for change but some lose heart in the face of his leadership style

“I want everyone to be a LeBron James.”

It’s early January, and Jay Sanderson is talking in his corner office on the 11th floor of The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles’ headquarters about his first year as president of Federation, explaining the versatility and passion he expects of his staff.

“LeBron James is a great basketball player, because he can score and he can rebound, but he’s also a great passer and he can play great defense,” Sanderson says.

James is also nationally reviled as opportunistic and disloyal. Last year, he famously quit and dissed his hometown Cleveland Cavaliers to join the Miami Heat, bragging about what he could do there.

Sanderson seems genuinely puzzled when his reference is questioned.

“Why, are you from Cleveland?” he asks.

When you’re talking to Sanderson, you can’t assume that what you are hearing is what he thinks he is saying.

In an otherwise largely successful year of bold changes and evolving vision, Sanderson has been dogged by a puzzling disconnect between his intentions and how his words and actions are received by others.

Sanderson, along with Federation board chairman Richard Sandler, has spent the past year streamlining Federation’s operation, lasering in on priorities, nurturing some programs and cutting others. He has begun to develop partnerships in the wider Jewish community and to repackage Federation to tell a more compelling story. He has questioned long-held traditions, brought in new lay leadership and restructured staff — some 25 staff members have been let go or have left, others have been promoted, and he courted and hired a team of much-lauded senior managers.

In the last quarter of 2010, he managed to bring the flagging annual campaign in above the previous year’s level — at $47.2 million — even when many other charitable organizations were in decline.

The fact that he rankled some longtime loyalists during this year of transition seems inevitable. Some of the people he let go had been at Federation for decades and were much loved. Programs and institutions once considered untouchable now look to uncertain futures.

But the discontent surrounding Sanderson among rank-and-file professional staff at Federation seems to run deeper then the standard “change is hard” fare.

Current and former staff members say blanket demands and unbending schedule restrictions have drained the passion for many. They say Sanderson operates with a brusque style and has been known to make jokes that leave both the target of the barb and everyone else in the room squirming.

And with so many people eliminated through the restructuring, the remaining staff is operating under a sense of impending doom.

“It feels like the soul has been sucked out of the place,” one former staffer said.

Sanderson is taken aback when I tell him the staff is terrified of him. He says he understands that the pace and depth of the changes affected many employees through last year, but he believes that things have settled in the last few months and that morale has picked up.

He says the clearer expectations and demands may have rubbed some the wrong way initially, but through it all he has tried to create a congenial work environment where people know they are appreciated.

“Did anyone tell you how funny I am?” he asks. “Or about the parties? I took the whole staff to the Olympic Collection after my first six months here. We had dinner and karaoke for the entire building.”

So, is Jay Sanderson misunderstood or ruthless? And in the end, if he is taking Federation in the direction it needs to go, does his personal style matter?

Leading with a mission

It’s 9 a.m. on a Wednesday in February, and after a predawn workout near his Encino home, and a couple of hours of phone calls and e-mails, Sanderson, 53, already has his jacket off and sleeves rolled up at his first meeting of the day, where he is discussing potential collaboration between Federation and the Autry National Center. The Autry is preparing a 2013 exhibition on the history of Jews in Los Angeles, and this year Federation is celebrating its 100th anniversary.

Sanderson talks about the community’s history and what is wrong and right with Jewish Los Angeles today, sharing anecdotes from his 20 years as an active observer of the community.

Sanderson’s passion often flows forth in a surge of words, and he has a tendency to cut himself off, then circle back, in his excitement to get new ideas across.

He and the Autry representatives agree to pursue joint programming that could deepen the community’s appreciation for its roots.

Partnerships with other organizations are at the core of Sanderson’s vision. He believes Federation can best serve the community by establishing priorities and then leveraging its considerable resources, clout and knowledge in collaborations with other organizations based on those priorities.

“We can no longer be just a place that takes your money and gives it somewhere else. The value proposition is that we have certain expertise and experience, and we have a big-picture view of the Jewish world. We are able to work with a number of partners, bring a number of people into the room at the same time and say, ‘Here is the issue,’ ” he said.

Federation was created a century ago as a fundraising conglomerate for a specific set of beneficiary agencies and, until a few years ago, still had a list of organizations that could count on annual allocations. While that model slowly changed over the years to include many organizations and programs, in 2008 then-Federation chairman Stanley Gold upended the system, opening up bidding to all community organizations and phasing out automatic allocations.

Sanderson has further refined the model, creating three strategic areas – Caring for Jews in Need, Ensuring the Jewish Future and Engaging in Our Community. Federation now engages an array of organizational leaders to proactively identify the needs in the community and then decides how to apply dollars and resources to best accomplish goals in its three strategic priority areas.

Sanderson spent much of his first year gathering information, developing a vision and reorganizing, and he is now starting to set those plans in motion.

Over the past few months, Federation has begun convening meetings for groups with like interests. Recently, the Ensuring the Jewish Future department held a meeting for professionals in the area of Jewish camping, and is now setting its sights on connecting with interfaith families and with organizations that might service the 15,000 Birthright Israel alumni in Los Angeles. Engaging the Community held a meeting for diverse organizations involved with Israel education and advocacy on campus.

“We don’t anymore define ourselves as an entity that solely sustains a web of specific organizations in the community,” said Andrew Cushnir, whom Sanderson promoted to executive vice president and chief program officer. “We define ourselves by our ability to respond to the community’s biggest challenges and to lead and nurture the Jewish community.”

A similar mission-driven plan was enacted in 1999 by New York’s UJA-Federation, and while there the change initially led to some uncertainty, their agencies have since come out stronger, according to John Ruskay, executive vice president and CEO of New York’s Federation.

“We started to ask not what do our agencies need, but what do we need to do to maintain and create a caring community,” Ruskay said. “Then we sought ways in which our agencies could make that happen.”

Once a goal is accomplished, Ruskay said, Federation can move on to the next set of issues.

Along the way, New York’s annual donations grew from $117 million to $154 million.

Sanderson said he hopes to bring the Los Angeles campaign up to $75 million in the next few years, and to double the number of donor households — currently around 16,000 out of Los Angeles’ 200,000 Jewish households. He has hired staff to reach out to younger Jews and created a position to forge innovative collaborations.

“I think Jay is doing a phenomenal job,” said Alan Rosen, a member of Federation’s executive board and president of the Valley Alliance. “I think his vision is very refreshing, and he is bringing a lot of enthusiasm to the organization.”

He is also bringing a deeply rooted Jewish identity.

Sanderson grew up in the projects outside Boston and has formative memories of a rabbi who stepped in after his father died when he was 5, and of holidays and Shabbats with his Orthodox grandparents. His strong ties to Israel were forged first on a Jewish Agency trip when he was 14. He, his wife and two almost-grown children usually attend Rabbi Naomi Levy’s Nashuva congregation, but Sanderson still maintains the habit of shul-hopping he developed when he was one of the compilers of Newsweek’s Top 50 Rabbis list.

Sanderson was not an obvious pick for the job of leading Federation, having spent the previous 20 years running the Jewish Television Network. Even at its height, that organization had maybe a dozen employees — far from the approximately 160 he now manages.

A typical 14-hour day for Sanderson might include a senior staff meeting with Executive Vice President Carol Koransky.

Just kidding?

It’s the Wednesday before Super Sunday, the phone-a-thon that kicks off the annual giving campaign, and around 20 senior managers file into the executive conference room for the weekly staff meeting.

As the vice presidents and department heads gather around the table, Sanderson bangs on the table and yells, “Damn you, John!”

It’s a joke — for my benefit.

I had asked Sanderson earlier about rumors that he yells at people at staff meetings — an allegation Sanderson said is unfounded — so he and his staff have been practicing their lines. John Magoulas, senior vice president, is in on the antic and appears amused when Sanderson repeats the refrain several times.

The atmosphere at the staff meeting is comfortable and friendly, with a good dose of playful banter and joking. But the senior staff members are all people hired by Sanderson, or have risen to the top as others around them have fallen. They are in on Sanderson’s vision and for the most part have grown accustomed to his style.

“Jay is a bluntly honest leader, and that works better for some people than others,” said one senior staffer, who wasn’t comfortable talking about Sanderson on the record. “He says what he says very directly, and not everyone is used to that. But there is integrity to the way he communicates that is missed in the perception of his being rough around the edges.”

Sanderson said he often starts meetings with jokes and stories to warm people up, but current and former staff members — none would speak on the record, fearing retribution — told me that the teasing often gets personal, and the jokes and comments border on inappropriate.

To give me a sense of his interactions, Sanderson invited me along on a stroll through the building, a daily habit that he sees as a good way to connect with employees.

We stop at the graphics department, where he compliments some new invitation designs on the bulletin board and talks for a minute with a designer. Then he asks her — with genuine concern — “Is something wrong with your feet? It looks like you’re walking funny.”

We walk by two women working at adjacent desks.

“Oh, I got your e-mail about moving you far away from Christina. Don’t worry, I’ll take care of it,” Sanderson says with a laugh.

On another floor, he jokes with a woman in a cubicle: “This is your last day here, right? I’ll come by later to help you pack.”

A few weeks later, Sanderson tells me he regrets that remark, that he realizes the topic may be a little too raw for joking.

Even his walks through the building are a source of misunderstanding. Sanderson sees them as a way to connect with the people who work there. The people who work there see it as Sanderson checking up on them to make sure they are at their desks and hard at work.

During my interview with him, Sanderson commented about the challenge of hiring young women who take months of maternity leave. Two former staffers said they’ve heard him make similar comments.

Later, Sanderson told me by way of explanation that, in his first six months on the job, several valued employees were gone for months on maternity leave, and their absence was deeply felt. He says he was merely expressing frustration at missing effective employees, not prescribing any hiring policies.

Sanderson says that over the last year he has learned to monitor himself more carefully.

“The truth of the matter is, I never ran a company with 160 employees before, and I never ran a company as complex as Federation,” he said. “My entire life is completely different than it was 18 months ago. … I have to think more about what I am saying before I say it.”

But Sanderson said being open and demonstrative is part of who he is. “I have a personality, and even though I am more thoughtful and more deliberate and more process-oriented than I have ever been in my life, I am not going to sacrifice who I am.”

Federation chairman Sandler said that he and the board recognize that there needed to be a transition period for Sanderson to get used to working with large numbers of lay leaders, while lay leaders had to get used to what one donor called Sanderson’s “brusque Hollywood style.”

Julie Platt, chair of Ensuring the Jewish Future, said she has admired Sanderson’s hard work and clear vision, and she has seen him work to understand the players and figure out the best way to communicate with them. Both Platt and Sandler say that Sanderson has a remarkable ability to hear criticism and adjust.

“I knew from the process we had a smart guy who knew the community and cared about the community and wanted Federation to be successful, but I also knew we had a guy who had been a major critic of Federation in the past,” Sandler said. “The thing that has really impressed me about him is he learns every day and he listens. … He’s a much different person today in style than he was 12 months ago, in very positive ways.”

Jay Sanderson pushes for change but some lose heart in the face of his leadership style Read More »