fbpx

February 19, 2009

A Winning (and Kosher) Oscar Bash

At this time last year, Matt Accarrino was gearing up to throw the most talked-about Oscar party in town.

Vanity Fair magazine had tapped Craft Los Angeles, the restaurant where Accarrino is head chef, to host its annual post-Academy Awards bash. A year earlier, the magazine had held the party at Morton’s, and 800 people, from Oprah to Al Gore to that evening’s winners, had shown up to dance, dine and be photographed until the wee hours.

Now it was Craft’s turn to shine, and expectations were high.

Craft is the West Coast outpost of celebrity chef Tom Colicchio’s burgeoning empire. Patrons can’t help but judge its kitchen with the same stink-eye stare that Colicchio levels at the sweating, panting contestants on his hit show, “Top Chef.” Craft also holds down a corner of the Creative Artists Agency’s glassy, Apple Store-like headquarters in Century City — it’s an Industry commissary that should know how to wow A-listers.

The key to it all, Accarrino told me, is staying true to your cooking philosophy, no matter who’s coming to dinner, no matter how fancy the party.

“Dresses make parties fancy,” he said. “We have not ever really dramatically had to change what we do here at Craft to make it more or less fancy. We believe in serving the best ingredients we can find at their best. I may add a bit of personal style, but the quality of the food is the star.”

The menu he designed for the Vanity Fair party reflected that style: appetizers of fried brandade (dried cod purée) with caper aioli, piquillo pepper marmalade and spiced almond; trays of wagyu beef tartare with chimmichurri sauce, compressed cucumber and garlic toast, and pass-arounds of roasted baby beets, pistachio puree, goat cheese and blood orange.

But Accarrino hadn’t sliced into his first blood orange when Craft got word: the party was off. In the midst of the writer’s strike, Hollywood wasn’t in a partying mood.

“After much consideration, and in support of the writers and everyone else affected by this strike, we have decided that this is not the appropriate year to hold our annual Oscar party,” said a statement posted on VanityFair.com.

The cancellation came early enough so there wasn’t any food lost, and Accarrino took it in stride: the restaurant filled that night anyway with a private Oscar party for another client.

Craft isn’t kosher, but when I asked Accarrino to come up with recipes for a kosher Oscar party, he didn’t blink. The man has been around.

The New Jersey native took to the idea of cooking seasonal, locally farmed food while he worked at the Michelin guide-rated Antonello Colonna restaurant in Labico, Italy.

Back in the States he worked as an opening sous chef at chef Thomas Keller’s Per Se in New York, also putting in time at the restaurants of Rick Moonen, Charlie Palmer and Todd English.

He joined Colicchio’s team in 2005, after writing the chef something of a fan letter (judging from many e-mails, Accarrino’s a fine writer, too).

In coming up with a kosher menu, Accarrino said his sous chef Micah Wexler would help him with the assignment.

The 26-year-old Wexler was in charge of all special events and private parties at Craft for 2008. Not only did the San Fernando Valley native work for Wolfgang Puck, Gino Angelini and, in New York, for Atelier Roubchon, he’s a graduate of Adat Ari El Day School and Milken Community High School. He’d better know kosher.

For an Oscar night menu, Accarrino and Wexler chose three dairy dishes that draw on bold fresh flavors and preparations that highlight the ingredients. When food is competing for attention with Vera Wang’s dresses and Bruce Vilanch’s punch lines, Accarrino’s advice is to “go for broke. Even when food is not the event, it’s no reason to make it anything less than special.”

In this case, special means smoked whitefish or salmon formed into a rillette, or French-style country paté, then rolled in traditional Moroccan brik pastry and fried. A second dish involves fresh goat cheese melted on a crisp homemade flatbread together with onions that have been sautéed slowly until sweet and caramelized. The most complicated dish is a ravioli of earthy yams stuffed into a seasonal chestnut pasta. The finished ravioli are sautéed in brown butter and fresh sage, then served on spoons with chestnut slices, more sage and pomegranate seeds.

OK, not so simple. But Accarrino also has sound advice for a foolproof (and kosher) menu that would work for any party, at any season:

“Serve great cheeses, marinated farm-fresh vegetables, cucumber and tomato in the summer, cippolini onions and wild mushrooms in the winter. Serve great charcuterie. Although traditionally made with pork, there are great kosher examples, such as bresola [Italian air-dried beef] and prosciutto made from lamb or duck instead of pork. Serve things that can stay at room temperature and serve them family-style. It makes a great and generous presentation and keeps people together and social.”

“Simple things can be transcendent,” Accarrino reminded me. “The important thing is that the food is a   quality product and it tastes good. There is no substitute for flavor.”


GOAT CHEESE & ONION FLATBREADS

Ingredients:

1 package dry yeast
2 1/2 tablespoons water, warm
1 cup and 3 tablespoons water, room temperature
1 ounce olive oil
2 cups and 2 tablespoons flour
2 teaspoons kosher salt
1 tablespoon sugar
1 cup caramelized onions
1 cup goat cheese
1/2 cup pitted Nicoise olives, sliced
1 tablespoon chopped fresh thyme leaves

Mix yeast with warm water in mixing bowl; let stand till bloomed, five to 10 minutes. While you are waiting, mix dry ingredients. With the paddle attachment and machine on low speed, stir in water and oil till incorporated.

Gradually add dry ingredients, still on low speed. Mix two minutes. Change to the dough hook. Mix for two minutes more on low speed. Now on medium speed mix for three minutes more. Place in a well-oiled container and cover. Place in refrigerator and proof overnight.

The following morning, take dough out of refrigerator and let it come to room temperature for one hour. Remove dough gently and place on lightly floured table.

While dough is rising, prepare caramelized onions (recipe follows).

Divide dough into equal portions and shape into balls. Store in container that has been floured. Allow to rest for 20 minutes in a warm place. Punch down and roll out to a round shape.

Place on a pizza peel; top with caramelized onions, black olives and goat cheese. Slide onto preheated pizza stone in a 400 F oven. Bake eight to 10 minutes or till golden. Sprinkle thyme leaves over top and cut into wedges. Serve hot.

Caramelized Onions Ingredients:

2 onions
1/2 cup olive oil
salt and pepper

Slice two onions in half lengthwise, then cut into 1/4 inch slices crosswise.

Heat 1/2 cup olive oil in a large heavy skillet over medium heat. Add the onion, stir to coat with the oil, reduce the heat to medium-low, cover and cook, stirring occasionally until the onions are soft and have just begun to color, about 30 minutes.

Remove the cover, sprinkle with salt and pepper to taste, increase the heat to medium and cook uncovered, stirring frequently, until the onion is deep golden and caramelized, about 25 minutes.


Warm Smoked Fish Cigars and Salsa Verde

Fish Filling
1 pound flaked smoked whitefish or king salmon
1/4 cup diced steamed potato
1/4 cup diced sautéed carrot
1/4 cup diced sautéed celery
1/4 cup minced shallot, marinated with a few drops of red wine vinegar
1 tablespoon Dijon mustard
1 tablespoon crème fraiche
1 tablespoon fines herbs (chervil, parsley, tarragon, chives), chopped

Wrapping
1 package brik dough
1 egg beaten with 1 tablespoon water
Oil to fry (canola or vegetable)

Salsa Verde
3/4 cup chopped fines herbs (chervil, parsley, tarragon, chives)
1 tablespoon toasted pine nuts
1 tablespoon capers
1/3 cup bread crumbs
1 clove roasted garlic
2 tablespoons Parmesan cheese, grated
3 tablespoons extra-virgin olive oil

Combine flaked fish with warm potato and vegetables in a stand-up mixer fitted with paddle attachment. Mix to combine. Add in mustard, crème fraiche and herbs to combine. Season and chill.

Cut brik dough into 4-inch-by-4-inch squares. Form about one tablespoon of fish mixture into a log and roll brik dough around filling. Take care to fold in the sides. Seal the edge of the dough with egg wash. Reserve cigars for later.

In a blender, combine herbs, pine nuts, capers, bread crumbs, roasted garlic, Parmesan cheese and extra-virgin olive oil. Blend on low speed until a chunky but even paste forms. Season and reserve.

When ready to serve, fry cigars in 350 F oil until golden. Make sure you use a pot that is at least four times the volume of oil you plan to fill it with — you do not want it to overflow. Cut each cigar in half on a bias and serve with salsa verde.


Yam-Filled Chestnut Ravioli

Yam Filling Ingredients:

1 2/3 cups roasted, peeled yam 1 1/2 teaspoons brown butter
1 tablespoon mascarpone
1/2 teaspoon acacia honey
1 pinch kosher salt
5 turns black pepper

Combine all in food processor. This may take several batches. Cool.

Chestnut Pasta Dough Ingredients:

1/2 cup Italian 00 flour
2 1/2 tablespoons chestnut flour
1 whole egg
1 egg yolk
1 teaspoon whole milk
1 teaspoon extra-virgin olive oil

Combine all dry ingredients. Combine all wet ingredients. Mix wet to dry in stand-up mixer on medium for seven minutes.

Ravioli Ingredients:

Yam Filling from above
Chestnut Pasta Dough from above
Parmesan cheese
Unsalted butter
Fresh peeled chestnuts, sliced thinly
Sage leaves
Pomegranate seeds

Roll out chestnut dough using a pasta roller to the next-to-thinnest setting. Pipe teaspoon-size mounds of yam filling from a piping bag onto half the dough.

Fold the dough over and seal to form ravioli. Punch out with a round cutter (keep in mind these need to be small enough to fit on a spoon) and thin the edges all around to both seal the ravioli and ensure they will cook evenly. Cook the ravioli in simmering salted water till tender.

Meanwhile brown the butter in a sauté pan with the chestnuts, cooking them to a crisp and golden brown. Add the sage and fry to release the flavor. Add the ravioli and toss gently to coat in the browned sage butter.

Season and finish with grated Parmesan cheese. Place ravioli on spoons with chestnut slices, sage and garnish with pomegranate seeds.

 

A Winning (and Kosher) Oscar Bash Read More »

A Twenty-Dollar Camera Makes History

Tia Lessin did not set out to profile survivors of Hurricane Katrina when she and her life partner, Carl Deal, began shooting their Oscar-nominated documentary, “Trouble the Water,” in New Orleans, one week after the storm hit in late summer 2005. Instead, the co-directors planned to chronicle the thousands of Louisiana National Guard soldiers returning from Iraq to assist in the disaster relief.

A few days into their trip, however, it appeared that the directors might have to pack up and return home to New York. National Guard officials seemed wary of the independent filmmakers and weren’t giving them access to interviews. One even mumbled that “‘Fahrenheit 9/11’ had screwed things up” for documentarians — apparently unaware that Lessin had been a producer on “Fahrenheit” and a longtime associate of its provocative director, Michael Moore.

As Lessin continued to argue with the official, Deal, his camera running, followed some soldiers into a nearby Red Cross shelter, at which point a charismatic 24-year-old literally walked into his camera frame. She introduced herself as Kimberly Roberts, pointed out her husband, Scott, and announced that she had the real story about what had befallen impoverished residents due to Katrina.

“Almost immediately, we knew we had a new subject for our film,” Lessin said in a phone interview from San Francisco, where she was promoting the film.

She learned that the Roberts, an African American couple from New Orleans’ Ninth Ward, had had their car stolen three weeks before the hurricane. And that Kimberly just before the storm had purchased a camcorder for $20 and throughout the crisis turned the lens on herself and others who did not have the means to flee.

Roberts, who becomes the main character of “Trouble the Water,” realized even amid the chaos and terror that her harrowing video of waters rising and people cowering in her attic would be astounding historical footage.

“What I’ve got, I’ve been saving it, ’cause I don’t want to give it to nobody local,” she told Lessin soon after they met. “This needs to be worldwide. ’Cause all the footage I’ve seen on TV, nobody got what I got. I got right there in the hurricane.”

Lessin, the daughter and granddaughter of Holocaust survivors, recognized the extraordinary survivor spirit in Roberts, and she and Deal immediately saw an opportunity for collaboration. Roberts’ raw footage, combined with the documentarians’ own work, became their film.

Robert’s history and her trauma during Katrina and afterward became a through-line for a larger story about the hurricane and its aftermath. “Trouble the Water” weaves back and forth in time, describing how Roberts lost her mother to AIDS when she was 13, how she sold drugs and lived on the streets and then cleaned up her act, moved to the Ninth Ward and, before Katrina hit, aspired to become a rap artist.

The documentary reveals how Roberts used her street smarts to brave and flee the floodwaters and strove to assist both friends and strangers. She also stuck around to rebuild her community in the aftermath.

“If … destruction comes, I want to be here to tell people we had a world,” Roberts says on tape as the storm approaches. When she realized she wouldn’t be able to leave, she thought, “If I die, I hope somebody finds this camera.”

“Trouble the Water” won the 2008 Sundance Film Festival grand jury award for best documentary, as well as stellar reviews. TIME magazine called it “an endlessly moving, artlessly magnificent tribute to people the government didn’t think worth saving.”

Lessin, 44, said her approach to the project was informed by her own family history. Although she is careful not to equate the Holocaust with Katrina, she sees parallels in the destruction of tightly knit communities, the abandonment by government of its most vulnerable citizens and a Diaspora of refugees far from their homes.

“I understand from my own experience that this kind of tragedy impacts generations,” she said. “Something like Katrina doesn’t just happen to people and they move on. It has a legacy, and we will see that legacy unfold in the case of New Orleans for the next 40 years.”

The legacy of the Holocaust has deeply affected Lessin’s own life and work. As a girl, she pored through the memorial book that commemorated her maternal grandmother’s razed town. Her grandfather had the savvy to obtain passage to Trinidad — the only place he knew of where one could flee without a passport, escaping there with his wife and their 6-year-old daughter, Lessin’s mother. But when he learned of the death of his parents six years later, he fell into a severe depression and died destitute in Chicago.

“At the time, my grandmother was in her 30s, and she didn’t speak any English,” Lessin said. “She remarried, got work as a garment worker, made decent wages. But the pain and desperate sadness of her loss haunted her every day.”

Lessin’s mother grew up to become an attorney with the Justice Department; the filmmaker’s father was a lawyer with the Environmental Protection Agency. “They were liberals who believed in the role of government in helping its citizens,” Lessin said.

She inherited their Jewish passion for social justice, studying the American labor movement at Cornell University and helping organize restaurant workers on Capitol Hill. When her arrest for civil disobedience made the television news, Lessin saw the power of the media in advancing a cause and decided to become a documentary filmmaker.

Her first professional job in the early 1990s was preparing a video exhibition for the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum on how the U.S. government had failed to help Jews escape the Final Solution. She also interviewed descendants of Wounded Knee survivors for “Shadow of Hate,” Charles Guggenheim’s film about racial and religious intolerance. And then she saw the pilot for Michael Moore’s satirical television program, “TV Nation.”

“It had been called the smartest and funniest show on television, but it was also highly political, and I realized you could do all those things at once,” Lessin said. “I vowed to get a job on that show by hook or by crook.”

Lessin not only got her wish, she also went on to work as a producer for Moore on films such as “The Awful Truth” and “Bowling For Columbine,” sometimes stepping in to do interviews when “Michael’s mere presence might set people off.”

“He taught me to be completely unapologetic about storytelling, to never take no for an answer and that humor sometimes is a more potent weapon than outrage,” Lessin said. “Michael also was the pioneer of using personal voice to draw people into a story,” which we used for ‘Trouble the Water.’ Although Carl and I do not [present] ourselves in the movie, we definitely use the personal voice of Kimberly Roberts.”

Indeed, Roberts’ voice is so compelling that “Trouble the Water” has been cited alongside Spike Lee’s “When the Levees Broke” as one of the most important films to emerge about Katrina. The film also is among “the most eloquent records we have of a tragedy that brought out some of the most impressively alive men and women in New Orleans,” a reviewer wrote in The New Yorker.

Lessin hopes the movie will counter the cliché of Katrina survivors as victims.

“It’s a story,” she said, “about the resilience of both a couple and a community.”

A Twenty-Dollar Camera Makes History Read More »

The Curious Case of ‘Hollywood Jew’

I owe it all to Brett Ratner. He was my first. We met one luscious summer night, he invited me to his home and, four hours later, sent me out into the world of Hollywood journalism armed with a juicy first story: an under-40, billion-dollar director with impeccable taste and a playboy reputation. Slightly naïve at the time, I didn’t escape unscathed (let’s just say that sitting on the board of the Simon Wiesenthal Museum isn’t the only thing that gets him excited), but I did walk away with a searching question:

What exactly does it mean to be Jewish in today’s Hollywood?

There was a time when a men’s club of Jews founded and controlled Hollywood — the Warner brothers, Louis B. Mayer, Carl Laemmle, Adolph Zukor and William Fox, each of whom helped launch the studio system in the 1930s — and who were united not only in their Eastern European roots, but also in their desire to assimilate.

“Above all things, they wanted to be regarded as Americans, not Jews; they wanted to reinvent themselves here as new men,” historian Neal Gabler wrote in his 1988 book, “An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood.” But, as with almost everything else in Jewish history, that wasn’t easy. For decades, Hollywood was accused of being “run by Jews,” who were, so the story went, using movies to undermine American values.

The unremitting notion that Jews run Hollywood has changed distinctly since those early studio days. For starters, media conglomerates have absorbed the studios once owned by Jewish individuals. And while before Hollywood Jews may have had a deep, almost psychic sense of ethnicity, today’s Hollywood Jews are more secular, retreating from the cultural identity bequeathed by their entertainment ancestry (though perhaps not from their cutthroat business instincts).

Jewish identity in today’s Hollywood, like American Jewry in general, is not monolithic. Just a week ago, a producer at Sony told me Jewish identity has gone into hiding as a result of foul play on Wall Street and tribal shame over the Bernard Madoff mess. Jeff Silver, producer of the upcoming “Terminator Salvation,” told me nonchalantly that the idea of Jewish Hollywood “means nothing” to him.

“There is a subtle way in which Judaism has infused my ethical life, which is significant; but it’s not Judaism per se that is a cognizant part of my day-to-day life,” Silver said, even though he has also said that he relates “very strongly” to being Jewish.

Then again, Jewish identity surfaces in Hollywood in mysterious ways. For example, Academy voters seem to have a penchant for Holocaust narratives, which may explain why “The Reader” trumped “Revolutionary Road” for Oscar nods. Could the reason be as cliché as guilt? As egocentric as tribalism? Or is there something altogether deeper? (See Hollywood Jew blog post “And The Academy Would Like to Thank … The Holocaust” at jewishjournal.com.) And I haven’t yet figured out why on earth Abe Foxman endorsed “The Reader,” a film that unapologetically asks us to sympathize with a Nazi war criminal because she’s —horror of horrors — illiterate. Furthermore, what will become of Ari Folman’s Israeli war documentary, “Waltz With Bashir,” on Oscar night? Sure, it won the praise of critics, as well as a Golden Globe, but it remains a mystery as to whether Jewish academy voters will see it as a pro-Israel or anti-Israel film — or even which sentiment they’d prefer. 

Then, of course, there’s the curious case of Mel Gibson. His relationship with Jewish Hollywood, although fraught, has been telling: First, he makes a pointed and polemical film, “The Passion of the Christ,” which unleashes a wave of anti-Semitic, pre-Vatican II accusations; soon after that, he embarks on an anti-Semitic tirade when pulled over for drunk driving. It doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to figure out why we haven’t heard much from him since, but the fallout was awfully quiet. The majority of Hollywood Jews remained conspicuously silent in the face of Gibson’s slander; only Amy Pascal, co-chair of Sony Pictures and Endeavor agent Ari Emanuel publicly condemned his visceral Jew-bashing.

So it would seem that no matter how the equation of Jewish power plays out in Tinseltown, there are still times when being Jewish hurts and it pays to stay silent.

And yet, there will always be an abundance of stories to tell:

Like, how Jeffrey Katzenberg and Lionsgate president Jon Feltheimer have a religious devotion to the Lakers; or why SAG president Alan Rosenberg dined alone last Saturday night; or how Kat Dennings, the rising starlet of “Nick and Norah’s Infinite Playlist,” is handling the emergence of an onscreen sexuality at the tender age of 22; or why when I met Oliver Stone, my plans to talk Judaism were foiled, because, though his father was Jewish, he was raised Episcopalian, and he’s now Buddhist. Come to think of it, that’s a very Jewish story too.

So thanks to Brett Ratner, I’m on a brand-new mission — getting to the heart of this “Hollywood Jew” business. I’ll be profiling the exciting ones, reporting the scandals and the news, analyzing the culture and ethics — the whole lot — and I’m not stopping until I get to Spielberg.

The Curious Case of ‘Hollywood Jew’ Read More »

The Theos

If you remember your Bible — and of course you do — you’ll recall the scene when Moses comes down from Mount Sinai and sees the People of Israel — that’s you — forsaking God and praying to a statue of a Golden Calf. 

Well, every year as I watch the Oscars I always imagine Moses coming down from the mountain only to find his People lifting their eyes in unholy expectation toward a statue of a Little Golden Man. And just as they are announcing the Oscar pick for Best Original Song, Moses would look at the tablets in his arms and say, “I hold these Ten Commandments, written by God, and you’re giving an award to the guy who wrote, ‘It’s Hard Out Here for a Pimp’?” Then he’d smash the tablets on the floor of the Kodak Theatre.

That’s why every year I stay away from the Oscars. That, and I’ve never been nominated.

All this got me thinking, what’s with all this awards narrishkayt? (For the Yiddishly impaired: narrishkayt is Yiddish for bullsh**.) Sure movies can change the world, uplift people’s miserable lives, bring joy to millions and hard currency to struggling, much-loved development executives, but maybe we should be honoring something even bigger. How about an attempt to end all wars? People say religion causes war. Narrishkayt! Too many religions cause war. If there were just one, there’d be nothing to fight over. So wouldn’t it be great if we could preempt all wars by choosing one religion?

Maybe it’s time we picked a winner.

So forget about the Oscars, or the Emmys. I say we have one big theological awards show called … “The Theos”!

ANNOUNCER (V.O.)
Here to present this year’s nominees is last year’s winner, Bishop Desmond Tutu.

BISHOP TUTU
And the nominees for outstanding religion in an organized or unaffiliated sect are … Catholicism: Pope Benedict the XVI — Jesus Christ, producer. Judaism: Moses — Steven Spielberg, producer. Buddhism: The Dalai Lama — Richard Gere, producer.

There would be other nominees as well, but I’m not gonna name names, because certain religions don’t take jokes very well.

Then they announce the winner. If the Theos took place in Hollywood and Judaism won, some would argue it was fixed. The same would be said if Scientology takes home the award. Even Catholicism would come under scrutiny if it won. The Jews run Hollywood, so of course they’d pick one of their own (anyone remember that Jesus was a rabbi?). I know that if I were a member of the academy, I’d vote for Judaism. But if it didn’t win, I’d be rooting for Jesus. Because, you know how some people go back to eating meat after being vegetarians? Maybe he’d reconsider and come back to his Jewish roots. I believe that’s why the pope wears a yarmulke. Just in case Jesus comes back and says, “Hey everyone, I’ve had a long time to think about things, and I’ve decided to go back to the whole Jew thing I was doing!” And then the pope would raise his kippah and say, “I’m right there with ya, Jesus!”

Also, if Jesus won, it would make for such a great acceptance speech:

JESUS
There are so many people I want to thank. I should’ve written this down, but I didn’t think I was going to win! OK, first and foremost I want to thank my Dad. Thanks Pop! We did it! Um, I want to thank all the apostles, Peter, Paul, there are so many of you; if I forget, please forgive me. And my writers, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. Mary Magdalene, for all her love and support, and Charlie Sheen for introducing us.

At this point Jesus would get choked up and look down lovingly at the award.

JESUS (CONT’D.)
Ahhh, I don’t want to get all mushy here, but I have waited 2,000 years for this! Oh, and I want to thank all the rappers for thanking me in their acceptance speeches! This is goin’ out from JC to JayZ! Peace!

So when you’re watching the Oscars this year, I hope, like me, you’ll be yelling at the screen, “Go Jews, go!”

I do have to say that all this talk of awards just makes me think … damn, I’d love to win an Oscar!

Elon Gold is a comedian, actor and writer who has starred in sitcoms(FOX’s “Stacked,” NBC’s “In-Laws”) and is currently readying his fifthappearance on “The Tonight Show With Jay Leno” and hisone-man show, “Elon Gold: Half Jewish, Half Very Jewish.”

The Theos Read More »

Behind the Scenes With a ‘Bridezilla’

The wedding video Cynthia Silver will show her child one day is far from typical.

Most of the footage focuses on her frantic preparations before the ceremony, not the actual nuptials. What also sets her video apart is that it aired to an audience of 11 million people on nationwide television with the subtitle: “Life Is a Bitch and Then You Marry One.”

Silver, now 38 and five months pregnant, was one of the first brides featured on the reality television show, “Bridezillas,” which is one of the WE (Women’s Entertainment) network’s top-rated shows. The struggling actress has since turned her experience of being cast as a reality TV villain into a one-woman show, “Bridezilla Strikes Back,” opening Feb. 19 at the Zephyr Theatre in Los Angeles.

Aside from its indictment of reality television’s warped, manipulated depiction of weddings, “Bridezilla Strikes Back,” co-written with Kenny Finkle, is neither bitter nor accusatory. The show strikes a humorous, self-deprecating tone, much like “Bridget Jones,” according to The New York Times.

Silver readily admits to having been naïve and overly ambitious in thinking reality television might be her path to getting discovered. But in a roundabout way, the fiasco has given her acting career a boost.

Silver, who was 30 years old and in the midst of planning a $100,000 Manhattan wedding at the time, was lured into the world of reality television by a crew of British filmmakers who said they were shooting a documentary titled, “Manhattan Brides.” With visions of Oprah swimming in her head, Silver eagerly signed the release form and invited the camera crew from September Films to follow her to every hair appointment, cake tasting, DJ scouting and dress fitting.

The cameras were rolling when, days before the wedding, Silver tried on her wedding gown and had a total meltdown.

“The dress pushed every single one of my buttons,” said Silver, who was depicted on “Bridezillas” as a neurotic actress who practically had her therapist on speed-dial. “It tapped into all my insecurities and self-image issues and I tried to avoid dealing with the dress until almost the last minute.”

The entire tear-filled scene, during which Silver tossed out the $3,000 dress, was caught on camera. Distraught, Silver lost control and sobbed hysterically on a New York street corner.

“Having the camera right there made things so much worse,” Silver said.

The producer was in her face the entire time asking her how she felt, what she was thinking and what she was planning to do about the catastrophe, she said.

“It intensifies the stress. And you can’t ask them to turn off the camera for a second to let you recompose. You signed up for it,” she said.

Silver thought she understood the rules of the game and went along with it willingly, most of the time. Only after the filming wrapped did Silver discover what she had really signed up for.

The eight-part first season, which first aired on ITV in the United Kingdom and New York’s Metro TV in 2003, was bought by FOX and chopped down into a one-hour segment that aired as “Bridezillas” in January 2004.

Silver was horrified and outraged by her segment.

Another featured bride, Bronx hairdresser Julia Swinton-Williamson, was so upset she filed a $136 million suit against September Films and FOX, claiming that she was misled about the nature of the show. The judge later threw out the suit.

Silver said she’s been able to work out any negative feelings she harbored against the producers through her one-woman play. 

“Obviously, it was hurtful and embarrassing, but I learned a lot from the experience. I learned an incredible amount about my husband, who never once said, ‘I told you so’ even though he had reservations about us participating in the documentary,” she said.

Her husband, Matt Silver, is a production stage manager currently working on “Speed-the-Plow” in New York. He says “Bridezilla Strikes Back” has been cathartic for his wife.

“It’s not just a lashing out either. It’s a real monologue, a polished one-woman show,” he said.

“Bridezilla Strikes Back” sold out at the New York Fringe Fest in 2005, where it made its debut. A favorable review on Broadwayworld.com declared, “If this show gets its rightful life beyond the Fringe, she [Silver] may yet get that visit to Oprah.”

Silver’s husband would like to see his wife use the show as a vehicle for her original love — acting. And while he thinks the six-week run in Los Angeles is great, he thinks it might be time to let the matrimonial monster saga rest.

“I don’t want her life or her acting career to be consumed by ‘Bridezillas,’” he said.

While Silver has no regrets about appearing in “Bridezillas,” she is disappointed that she and her husband have little footage of their actual wedding day.

The couple thought two professional cameramen would be more than enough to capture their nuptials, so they didn’t hire their own videographers. And though the production company had verbally promised the couple raw footage of their wedding, September Films never followed through, Silver said.

So the only wedding video their child — due in June — will get to see is the same one millions of Americans have seen.

Silver, however, is not fazed.

“I have great faith that my child will have a great sense of humor,” she said.

For more information on “Bridezilla Strikes Back” visit Behind the Scenes With a ‘Bridezilla’ Read More »

Many Israelis Walk Down Wedding Aisle Less Traveled

Alternative wedding celebrations are on the rise in Israel. From celebrity ceremony officiators to personalized ketubahs and hand-written vows, Jewish wedding ceremonies in Israel are no longer all the same.

One of the reasons for this new trend is related to the young, secular Israelis’ rejection of the rabbinate requirements.

According to Shulamit Reinharz, Jacob Potofsky professor of sociology at Brandeis University and founder of the Women’s Studies Research Center and the Hadassah-Brandeis Institute, a large percentage of Israel’s young population sees the current marriage laws as religious coercion.

The Israel Religious Action Center claims that 25 percent of all Israeli couples look for alternative ways to celebrate their union, which includes going abroad for a civil marriage or creating their own unrecognized religious ceremony. However, aside from those who could legally be married by the rabbinate but choose not to, there are also many couples, like new immigrants and interfaith couples, who do not have an option to legally marry in Israel. All of these factors have led to the popularization of alternative wedding ceremonies over the last decade.

The Cummings Foundation reports that “the number of wedding ceremonies conducted outside the established system by Reform and Conservative rabbis, as well as secular educational leaders, has exploded.” Despite the fact that they have no legal standing, hundreds of young couples in Israel prefer to wed in their own fashion.

So what does an alternative wedding ceremony entail?

The Institute for Jewish Secular Rites, a nonprofit organization that offers 25 different secular ceremonies, explains that most of the traditional elements of a Jewish marriage ceremony are maintained. The chuppah, the Kiddush, the exchange of rings, the ketubah, the breaking of the glass and the seven benedictions still make up the ceremony. They are simply modified to suit each couple, which often means changing the text in the ketubah to express more equality and writing personal vows.

Couples give various reasons for wanting something different. For some, traditional ceremonies seem too impersonal, while others are turned off by the religious or old-fashioned elements, such as buying the bride and the bride’s required silence under the chuppah.

One popular trend is to be wed by celebrities. Yair Lapid and Avri Gilad are two well-known media personalities who have been performing marriage ceremonies for the past four years. In an interview with Yedioth Ahronoth’s Ynetnews, Lapid explained that he performs the ceremonies free of charge because he enjoys it.

“I meet couples that don’t want to be married by any kind of rabbi,” he said. “They want it to be a special and unforgettable ceremony that will include much self-expression. I just know how to do it. I make sure that the ceremony is emotional, that it has Judaism and some humor and also that it is done well.”

According to Gilad, the ceremony deals with the couple, their life and their love in a fundamental manner, rather than with Jerusalem and its destruction.

Many couples choose an alternative ceremony because they want something different that expresses their individuality. There are those who dream of sunrise ceremonies on a mountaintop or on the beach at sunset. Other couples take the stage and sing songs they’ve written for the occasion. Some grandiose weddings even hire television crews and screen the live ceremony on projectors rented for the occasion.

Online resources offer a wealth of information — from the alternative specialists to www.mitchatnim.com (a Web site with everything you need to know about planning a wedding in Israel, from how to stick to your budget to finding locations and hiring a makeup artist). Spending the time to do your homework in the beginning will save you a lot of frustration in the end — even if you’ve hired a wedding planner to help plan your big day.

And no matter what type of wedding a couple decides upon, most planners recommend shying away from the outrageous, the ostentatious and the quirky.

“I don’t like hiring carnival dancers and film crews for wedding ceremonies,” said Zvi Osossky, a wedding planner in Tel Aviv. “At the end of the day, what makes a successful wedding is the guests. You don’t need to spend a lot of money, take the stage with your guitar or go to extremes. What matters the most is keeping things simple.”

Many Israelis Walk Down Wedding Aisle Less Traveled Read More »

Two Lovers

I came out of the film “Two Lovers” the other night and didn’t know what to feel. My confusion was only partly related to the film; after two straight weeks of being on deadline (and a frenzied weekend at LimmudLA) I was feeling I might lose my mind and the movie gave me relief. Perhaps I related to the idea of being torn between two worlds, as was the protagonist, played by Joaquin Phoenix. And maybe it was no coincidence that one world was Jewish, filled with family expectations and tribal pressures—and the other was ‘another’ world, free and open and full of risk (made all the more enticing by the luring presence of Gwyneth Paltrow). 

The film follows a protagonist that is being compared to the boy-men that lined the pages of Philip Roth novels. Indeed, it is a coming-of-age story (if a belated one) that focuses on the polarizing tension between family expectations and freedom. A.O. Scott writes in the NY Times that, “Like a Roth hero — and just about every other American Jewish male protagonist from Augie March to Jerry Seinfeld — he struggles with the conflicting demands of filial duty and the longing to strike out on his own. He wants to be a good son, but he also wants to live a life of danger, freedom and impulse. Does he stick with his own kind and risk suffocation, or does he risk rootlessness in pursuit of liberation?”

But while the picture’s basic conflict is, as Scott puts it, “the tension between the individual spirit and the ways of the tribe,” it fails to account for another great theme present in the film—mental illness—that at once heightens the tension or was perhaps even caused by it. The characters that are inexplicably drawn to each other—though the nature of their need is different—both suffer from inner turmoil. Phoenix’s character is labeled bipolar and Paltrow is driven to drug addiction for reasons that never become clear. There is something wild, destructive and chemical about their dependency on one another. They are, for each other, like a drug that fuels their illness instead of tempering it or curing it. And the whole time—although the idea of liberation implies choice—you know their road together leads to madness. On the other hand, all the real possibilities of life are at home; where your family arranges your marriage and your job and you are tied to a community.

But illness can destroy that, too. Or make it impossible. I must have walked away confused because the movie tells you that no matter what you choose, you’re never really safe from wanting more.

Two Lovers Read More »

‘A Restless Spirit’ Soars, Q&A With Richard Gunther

Richard (Dick) S. Gunther thrives on self-imposed challenges. After a difficult childhood, World War II service and college, he became a real estate developer at 26 and a multimillionaire by age 34. At 40, he whipped himself into physical shape and then trekked up Mount Everest and Mount Kilimanjaro; he has also run marathons and bicycled all over the world. And he became a Los Angeles community leader and international philanthropist. Three years ago, at 80, he started writing “How High Is Up? The Tale of a Restless Spirit” (Emerald Book Company), reflecting the lessons of a complex and adventurous life.

He is a prominent player and philanthropist on the local, national and international stages, has innovated in senior citizen concerns, is a veteran Democratic Party activist and even made President Nixon’s enemies list as a Vietnam War opponent. He is also a director of the Grameen Bank, which combats global poverty through microcredit financing and, with his wife, Lois, endowed a permanent science exhibit at the Griffith Observatory. On the Jewish scene, he’s held key roles in Project Renewal in Israel, Operation Exodus for Soviet Jews, Brandeis-Bardin Institute, New Israel Fund and Americans for Peace Now.  He spoke to The Journal at his Century City office.

Jewish Journal: In ‘How High Is Up?’ you are remarkably open about your personal life, your character flaws, the sometimes bumpy progression of your family life, your hallucinogenic experiments, nude weekend retreat, and your immersion in psychotherapy and the Esalen Institute. Why did you write so frank a book, and weren’t you concerned about laying yourself wide open?

Richard Gunther: I initially intended to write this just for my three sons, to whom I’ve always stressed the importance of openness and honesty. So how could I write something that wasn’t totally open and honest? When my grandchildren read this book 20 years from now, they’ll really know what kind of a man their grandfather was. Sure, there’ve been rough spots in my life, but the point is, what did I learn from these setbacks?

JJ: You describe your 62 years with your wife, Lois as ‘five marriages’ to indicate a constantly evolving relationship. What have been the key elements in sustaining so long and close a relationship?

RG: When you have two strong individuals married to each other, you must learn to be honest and trust each other and maintain a mutual respect, even when you disagree with each other. You should have fun together and laugh together, and we do a lot of that. It helps if you have the same taste in politics, because if you don’t, you just have to take that topic off the table.

JJ: You were an only child whose father was killed in a plane crash when you were 8, and your new stepfather suddenly disappeared when you were 14. Your mother loved you but rarely displayed any signs of affection. How did those childhood experiences mold your later life?

RG: This background made me a very insecure child. I hesitated to reach out to anyone, because I feared rejection. It got better when I became a teenager and discovered that girls are different from boys. I now show a lot of physical affection toward my children and grandchildren, but it was a long process to achieve a measure of confidence and self-esteem.

JJ: Focusing on your Jewish involvements, how would you define yourself as a Jew?

RG: I am not a synagogue-going Jew, and Jewish ritual holds no significance for me, but Jewish ethics and the concept of tikkun olam (repairing the world) are central to my life view. About 25 years ago, I established my own method of self-reflection for Yom Kippur, when I sit at home and write down what I have done badly and what I have done well in the previous year. Then I compare that with what I wrote in previous years, to see if I’m making any progress.

JJ: Are you making progress?

RG: It depends. For instance, I’ve always been very impatient, but it’s getting better. Having children and grandchildren forces you to learn some patience.

JJ: When World War II ended, you got your army discharge on a Friday and started taking classes at UCLA the following Monday, which seems to bespeak a rather excessive intensity and drive. What are the upside and downside of these characteristics?

RG: Yes, I was pretty compulsive, which was great for my business career. I built around 3,000 homes, mainly in the San Fernando Valley, and became a millionaire while I was still in my 20s. Then things happened when I was 34. My mother died of cancer, and I also started to realize that in my single-minded focus on material success, I was missing out a lot. If life is a 360-degree circle, I was experiencing only 20 degrees.

JJ: You dedicate your book to your wife, children and grandchildren, and to your granddaughter, Eva, who was 12 when she was killed by a drunken driver. What impact did this tragedy have on your life?

RG: Eva was fabulous, sweet, athletic and bright, and her death has left a huge hole in my and my family’s life that has never been filled. If I had believed in a beneficent God, it would have gone out the window then. The constant pain diminishes over the years, but you never get over it.

JJ: The late screenwriter Michael Blankfort wrote a novel with my all-time favorite title: “I Didn’t Know I Would Live So Long.” You are now 83, active, healthy and sharp. Any formula for beating the odds and living long and well?

RG: Life is a relatively short journey, and you don’t get a second chance. So look at life as a wonderful adventure and be open to all the possibilities. Love is basic, love for your family and love for humanity. Move beyond yourself and be of service to others. Take risks — risks in your career and physical risks.

JJ: We’ve talked mostly about the positive aspects of your life, but recently you lost a very substantial part of your fortune in Bernard Madoff’s alleged Ponzi scheme. After a very successful business career and as a major investor, how do you cope with such a blow?

RG: It depends on which day you ask me. This whole thing has been so disruptive; there are times when I feel as if I’ve been kicked in the head, I feel that I’ve been a good guy and something like this shouldn’t happen to me at this stage of my life. On more enlightened days, I tell myself that I’m not alone in suffering a loss; that others are worse off. It’s not been an easy experience, but it’s not a tragedy. Eva’s death was a tragedy. The Madoff scandal is a great inconvenience, but it doesn’t make me cry.

Gunther is scheduled for a national radio interview tour and local book signings for “How High Is Up? The Tale of a Restless Spirit” at various venues. For information, visit www.dickgunther.com.

‘A Restless Spirit’ Soars, Q&A With Richard Gunther Read More »

Pro-Palestinian students, college debate divestment

Hampshire College insists it has not divested from Israel, but try telling that to pro-Palestinian students at the liberal arts school in Massachusetts or Israel defender Alan Dershowitz.

Students for Justice in Palestine, a student group at Hampshire, issued a statement last week claiming victory in its campaign to convince the school to become the first U.S. institution of higher learning to divest from Israel over its treatment of the Palestinians. The group also distributed an online press kit with endorsements from several prominent Israel critics, several of which mention the group’s successful campaign for “divestment from financial ties with Israel.”

Dershowitz, who has played a lead role in defending Israel in a series of campus battles across the country, has responded with calls for divestment from Hampshire College.

School officials, meanwhile, are scrambling to put out the word that both sides have it wrong. They say the Feb. 7 decision by the board of trustees to divest from a market index fund was prompted by concerns raised by the pro-Palestinian student group, but the move ultimately had nothing to do with Israel.

At issue is whether pro-Palestinian activists have crossed a significant threshold in their years long, and so far failed, campaign to convince U.S. universities to divest from Israel. The campaign has generated some headlines but produced no major victories.

In an interview Tuesday with JTA, Hampshire’s president, Ralph Hexter, said the final decision to divest from certain companies was not aimed at Israel and criticized the pro-Palestinian students for suggesting otherwise.

“I think they crossed the line of appropriate behavior,” Hexter said. “I think they were attempting to speak for the college.”

What’s not in dispute is that the decision followed a lengthy campaign by the pro-Palestinian students that focused on six companies deemed to be supporting or profiting from Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories. The student group targeted United Technologies, Caterpillar, Motorola, Terex, ITT and General Electric.

According to Students for Justice in Palestine, it made presentations to both the school’s investment responsibility subcommittee and the full board of trustees in May, after which the subcommittee recommended divestment from the six companies.

Hexter maintains, however, that when the recommendation came before the full investment committee, it was decided to undertake a broader screen of one of the college’s investment funds. The screen, performed by KLD Research & Analytics, found that the school was invested in more than 200 companies that violated principles of socially responsible investing, including several flagged by the students.

According to the school, however, the screen did not involve any criteria relating specifically to Israel. Instead, KLD evaluated issues relating to military weapons, employee discrimination, environmental concerns and employee safety, and also examined companies’ operations in two countries, Sudan and Myanmar.

What’s more, two of the companies named by Students for Justice in Palestine—Motorola and Terex—passed KLD’s screen, according to the college. A third company, United Technologies, was not screened because it was not part of the fund at the time.

Hexter, insisting that the decision was not a divestment from Israel, noted that the school maintains its investments in Israeli firms.

“The one thing that was quite clear in the investment committee from the start was that it was unacceptable for members to focus a decision on one area, and let me say specifically, on Israel,” said Hexter, who is on record opposing divestment from Israel.

Students for Justice in Palestine continues to dispute the college’s version of events, claiming that “the Palestine-Israel conflict was the most prominent reason behind divestment.” In a statement posted to its Web site, the group also says the administration sought its advice about which companies to avoid—a claim firmly denied by Hexter.

“SJP is disappointed that the college is choosing to shy away from the political implications of its action rather than embrace this moment,” the group said. “Regardless, a week ago Hampshire College was invested in the Israeli occupation of Palestine. Today, the college is no longer complicit in the funding of this injustice.”

Ironically, Dershowitz—a Harvard Law School professor, an outspoken critic of divestment efforts and the parent of a Hampshire alumni—echoed the sentiments of Students for Justice in Palestine in accusing the college administration of not fully owning up to what it had done.

“Neither side is being forthright,” Dershowitz told JTA. “The students are overstating what happened and the administration is understating what happened.”

Dershowitz is urging divestment from Hampshire, calling it the “No. 1” college in the United States deserving of divestment because of this episode and its tolerance for an atmosphere of hostility to the Jewish state that is “poison” for pro-Israel students. Dershowitz further accused the school of issuing a “phony clarification” and trying to be all things to all people.

“They were looking for an excuse to sell the six companies without just selling the six companies,” he said.

Pro-Palestinian students, college debate divestment Read More »