Should there have been a Palestinian speaker at the Democratic National Contention? That was the question on everyone’s mind last week, and frankly, the answer seems obvious — yes.
To say that there shouldn’t be “a Palestinian speaker” is like saying that there shouldn’t be a Black speaker, or a Jewish speaker, or a gay speaker. Whosoever would oppose a speaker’s presence at the DNC solely on account of their race or eth-nicity would seem to have no place in the party.
And yet, this framing of the question is misleading and incomplete. The Uncommitted Movement — the main Democratic caucus pushing for a Palestinian speaker — does not exist in a political vacuum. Their main goal is to steer the Democratic Party towards a radical arms embargo on Israel.
And so a more honest question would have been: Should the Democratic Party put a promoter of a cruel, misguided, and reckless policy on the main stage at the most important party event of the year?
A more honest question would have been: Should the Democratic Party put a promoter of a cruel, misguided, and reckless policy on the main stage at the most important party event of the year?
From where I sit, the answer is no.
Israel is still under attack by an alliance of malign actors shared by the United States as enemies. These include Iran and its many proxy armies such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis in Yemen, whose slogan, lest we forget, is “God Is the Greatest, Death to America, Death to Israel, A Curse Upon the Jews, Victory to Islam.”
Let’s not misinterpret what an arms embargo means. Those who want an arms embargo are those who want to see Israel defenseless against enemies sworn to its destruction; who want the Iron Dome to run out of ammo as Hezbollah rockets continue to destroy buildings in the north and push farther towards Tel Aviv; who long to see what would have happened to the Jewish state if the Jews were too weak to repulse Hamas’ invading army on Oct. 7.
Let’s not misinterpret what an arms embargo means. Those who want an arms embargo are those who want to see Israel defenseless against enemies sworn to its destruction.
On Sunday we woke up to news that Israel had thwarted a major Hezbollah attack that could have caused serious damage and loss of life for innocent Israelis. Those who want an arms embargo are those who wish Sunday’s headline was different, telling of death and destruction instead of resilience and self-defense.
Most Democrats, to their great credit, still find such a policy abhorrent.
One Palestinian speaker pushed by the Uncommitted Movement was Georgia State Rep. Ruwa Romman. Her undelivered speech was published in Mother Jones.
In it, she refers to the war in Gaza as “the massacres in Gaza.” Obviously, this is a mischaracterization of the war itself. It is also a slap in the face to Joe Biden, who endorsed and shaped that war, and to Kamala Harris as well. Are we shocked that they didn’t want to platform this perspective at an event designed to drum up enthusiasm for the VP-turned-presidential hopeful?
In a pathetic imitation of evenhandedness, Romman calls to “free all the Israeli and Palestinian hostages.” But Israel has no hostages, which are definitionally people seized for the purpose of extortion. Israel has prisoners. Many of them are guilty of perpetrating the most gruesome of Oct. 7’s crimes. Hamas has hostages. Young women, children, elderly, and the disabled. According to Romman, Yahya Sinwar himself would be considered a freed hostage.
When Rachel and Jon Goldberg-Polin, parents of the Israeli-American hostage Hersh Goldberg-Polin, took the stage at the DNC, they were right to acknowledge the great tragedy that this war has brought upon the people of Gaza, and right to pray for the war’s speedy end.
The suffering of Palestinians is not to be ignored, and it was important to make space for it at the DNC. But as for empowering the Uncommitted Movement — a group that openly despises the policies of the current candidate and her predecessor — it seems fairly obvious that saying no was the right and only choice for the Democrats to make.
Matthew Schultz is a Jewish Journal columnist and rabbinical student at Hebrew College. He is the author of the essay collection “What Came Before” (Tupelo, 2020) and lives in Boston and Jerusalem.
Did the DNC Make the Right Call on a Palestinian Speaker?
Matthew Schultz
Should there have been a Palestinian speaker at the Democratic National Contention? That was the question on everyone’s mind last week, and frankly, the answer seems obvious — yes.
To say that there shouldn’t be “a Palestinian speaker” is like saying that there shouldn’t be a Black speaker, or a Jewish speaker, or a gay speaker. Whosoever would oppose a speaker’s presence at the DNC solely on account of their race or eth-nicity would seem to have no place in the party.
And yet, this framing of the question is misleading and incomplete. The Uncommitted Movement — the main Democratic caucus pushing for a Palestinian speaker — does not exist in a political vacuum. Their main goal is to steer the Democratic Party towards a radical arms embargo on Israel.
And so a more honest question would have been: Should the Democratic Party put a promoter of a cruel, misguided, and reckless policy on the main stage at the most important party event of the year?
From where I sit, the answer is no.
Israel is still under attack by an alliance of malign actors shared by the United States as enemies. These include Iran and its many proxy armies such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis in Yemen, whose slogan, lest we forget, is “God Is the Greatest, Death to America, Death to Israel, A Curse Upon the Jews, Victory to Islam.”
Let’s not misinterpret what an arms embargo means. Those who want an arms embargo are those who want to see Israel defenseless against enemies sworn to its destruction; who want the Iron Dome to run out of ammo as Hezbollah rockets continue to destroy buildings in the north and push farther towards Tel Aviv; who long to see what would have happened to the Jewish state if the Jews were too weak to repulse Hamas’ invading army on Oct. 7.
On Sunday we woke up to news that Israel had thwarted a major Hezbollah attack that could have caused serious damage and loss of life for innocent Israelis. Those who want an arms embargo are those who wish Sunday’s headline was different, telling of death and destruction instead of resilience and self-defense.
Most Democrats, to their great credit, still find such a policy abhorrent.
One Palestinian speaker pushed by the Uncommitted Movement was Georgia State Rep. Ruwa Romman. Her undelivered speech was published in Mother Jones.
In it, she refers to the war in Gaza as “the massacres in Gaza.” Obviously, this is a mischaracterization of the war itself. It is also a slap in the face to Joe Biden, who endorsed and shaped that war, and to Kamala Harris as well. Are we shocked that they didn’t want to platform this perspective at an event designed to drum up enthusiasm for the VP-turned-presidential hopeful?
In a pathetic imitation of evenhandedness, Romman calls to “free all the Israeli and Palestinian hostages.” But Israel has no hostages, which are definitionally people seized for the purpose of extortion. Israel has prisoners. Many of them are guilty of perpetrating the most gruesome of Oct. 7’s crimes. Hamas has hostages. Young women, children, elderly, and the disabled. According to Romman, Yahya Sinwar himself would be considered a freed hostage.
When Rachel and Jon Goldberg-Polin, parents of the Israeli-American hostage Hersh Goldberg-Polin, took the stage at the DNC, they were right to acknowledge the great tragedy that this war has brought upon the people of Gaza, and right to pray for the war’s speedy end.
The suffering of Palestinians is not to be ignored, and it was important to make space for it at the DNC. But as for empowering the Uncommitted Movement — a group that openly despises the policies of the current candidate and her predecessor — it seems fairly obvious that saying no was the right and only choice for the Democrats to make.
Matthew Schultz is a Jewish Journal columnist and rabbinical student at Hebrew College. He is the author of the essay collection “What Came Before” (Tupelo, 2020) and lives in Boston and Jerusalem.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
A Bisl Torah — What Do They Need?
A Moment in Time: “I Am Here”
Korach and the Mutineers – A poem for Parsha Korach
Print Issue: What Will Bibi Do Now? | June 12, 2026
Iran Deal Puts Israelis in Cognitive Dissonance with ‘Best Friend’ Trump
Ancient Crave-worthy Wisdom in Greek and Biblical Literature
Phil Rosenthal’s Latest Children’s Book Encourages Kids to ‘Just Try It!’
Published by Simon & Schuster, the book, which was published in March, encourages young readers to embrace new experiences, even when they seem a little scary at first.
Marking BCI’s 85th Anniversary, Jewish Leaders Reflect on a Program That Shaped Their Lives
Through communal living, arts, music, discussion, outdoor experiences and Jewish learning, the program has long sought to help young adults explore both Judaism and themselves.
Mandana Dayani at JFSLA: ‘The Spirit of Humanity Is the Choice to Show Up When It’s Hard’
Dayani’s activism has taken many forms over the years, but at its core is a focus on civic engagement and Jewish identity.
From Beverly Hills to Capitol Hill: Three American Jews Honored
The occasion was Project Legacy’s annual Jewish American Heritage Month luncheon, an event that civic engagement leader Ezra Friedlander has, over the years, turned into one of May’s most substantive gatherings in Washington
Alone No More: How Aliyah Became a Lifeline for LiAmi Lawrence
From someone who once needed help finding a job, food and support, Lawrence became the person providing it — offering connections, employment assistance, food gift cards and a 24/7 support line for those in need.
True Legends and a Smoked Brisket
This week we share our column with one of our favorite Instagram bloggers, New Yorker Jeff Mosczyc (pronounced Mah-zik). As the son of a German immigrant father and a first-generation Hungarian mother, his mouthwatering, meat-centric recipes reflect his Ashkenazi background.
Father’s Day Food
This year’s Father’s Day round-up features recipes from different ends of the Jewish spectrum: dill pickle kraut and a Moroccan tomato dip.
Table for Five: Korach
Challenging Moses
Trump’s Surrender to Iran is Evident in First Sentence of Ceasefire Deal
Trump may have the bluster, but the mullahs know they hold the cards.
What Will Bibi Do?
With the U.S. and Iran signing a ceasefire deal that limits Israel’s options, the Israeli prime minister is facing a most difficult moment during an election year.
Don’t Forget the People: The Iran Ceasefire Must Protect Civilians
As details emerge about a signed agreement between the United States and Iran, there still may be room to protect the Persian people from Tehran’s despots, the Lebanese from Hezbollah, Yemenis from the Houthis and Gazans from Hamas.
A Holocaust-Era Heroine for the Ages in ‘The Goddess of Warsaw’
In “The Goddess of Warsaw,” our hero is Lena Browning, an aging Hollywood starlet who has similar credentials to Marilyn Monroe, Joan Crawford and Jane Mansfield.
Trump’s Civilizational Moment
It all depends on one mercurial and imperfect man in the White House. But whether he succeeds or fails, he is leading a free world, much of which no longer understands what it needs to do to survive.
Trump’s New Iran Deal Leaves Israel to Confront Old Dangers Alone
Now Israel watches as its closest friend prepares to hand billions of dollars to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. It sees the nuclear issue endlessly discussed but still unresolved, and Lebanon left hanging in uncertainty.
When ‘Peace’ Breaks Out
Ultimately, although he presented himself as a disruptor, Trump remains captive to the conceptual frameworks, values and norms of Western societies, which place them at a disadvantage in the current clash of civilizations.
Benjamin Franklin, Korah, and the Battle for the Constitution
Just as Moses and Aaron had proven their God-approved mettle, “the new federal constitution,” which, in Franklin’s view, had “been unreasonably and vehemently opposed,” would ultimately prevail by God’s grace.
We Need a Long-Term Strategy to Deal with Iran
In handing Tehran the keys to lock up the region without a fight, Trump would become the first American president to sign away his country’s right to ply international waters freely.
Hope Is Not a Foreign Policy
The “deal,” as far as is known right now, is simply a 60-day extension of the ceasefire. The can will be kicked down the road.
A Heavenly Service
During these days when it is so easy to succumb to despair, religious services can serve as a wonderful antidote to hopelessness. Especially this one.
What My Soul Knows Before I Do
Sometimes the soul arrives before the explanation does. And sometimes, just before dawn, the world becomes quiet enough for us to notice the first light.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.