After twelve years in power, Netanyahu as head of the opposition is now a possibility. In fact, it is a likelihood more than a possibility. Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu has two weeks to form a coalition before his mandate expires, and his options are: let someone else from within his own camp be the prime minister, or become the head of the opposition. Forming a coalition and a government no longer seems a realistic option.
Can you believe it? You’d have to get used to it, but for Netanyahu this will be his third time as head of the opposition. He was there when Prime Ministers Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres ran the country in the early nineties. He was there when Prime Minister Ehud Olmert ran the country until 2009. He might have to readjust to this position, this time while standing trial.
For Netanyahu this will be his third time as head of the opposition.
How did this happen? The election forced Netanyahu to find more partners than his usual camp of supporters. He needed to recruit Naftali Bennett’s Yamina party — when Bennett was running to replace him. He needed to retain the support of the hawkish Religious Zionist party. And he needed Islamist Raam to get to more than 60 seats. The short story is that the Religious Zionist party refused to sit with Raam. Netanyahu tried to lure the New Hope party in as substitute, but this also failed. He then floated a new idea: a quick special election only for the job of prime minister. But on Monday, Netanyahu’s bloc was ambushed by the “camp of change” and lost control of forming Knesset committees. Raam closed a deal with opposition leader Yair Lapid and voted against Netanyahu.
That was a final reality check. Netanyahu does not have a majority and is unlikely to have one in the next two weeks. If he does nothing, the other camp will get a shot at forming an uneasy coalition of rivals. Hawkish Bennett and Gideon Saar, centrist Yair Lapid and Avigdor Lieberman, leftist Labor and Meretz and, finally, Islamist Raam. This will be a narrow coalition and one that is ideologically incoherent. Its goal would be to unseat Netanyahu and focus on uncontroversial policies. It might be formed or it might not; it might survive for more than a few months or it might not. Bennett would likely start as the prime minister, followed by Lapid after two years, if the coalition doesn’t collapse under its own weight. Netanyahu is going to blast it daily, calling it a left-wing coalition, denigrating it as illegitimate (Bennett, with seven seats, as the prime minister? It’s not illegitimate, but it is slightly weird).
Netanyahu’s other option is to hand someone else in Likud the key to forming a coalition. But he is smart enough to know that this key will not be easily returned. He is also smart enough to know that being the leader of the opposition is not as powerful a position as being the prime minister. If a Bennett-Lapid government survives for more than a few months, the grumble of Likud members could lead to revolt against him.
Then again, his cards are few and weak. For now, he will prepare for the following scenarios:
Best case (for him): The other coalition also doesn’t form, and Israel goes to a fifth election.
Second best: A coalition forms but collapses after a short time, when Netanyahu still controls Likud.
Third option: Netanyahu is the head of the opposition and has to fight against his rivals’ government, the prosecutors at the court and a revolt within Likud.
Netanyahu, Head of the Opposition?
Shmuel Rosner
After twelve years in power, Netanyahu as head of the opposition is now a possibility. In fact, it is a likelihood more than a possibility. Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu has two weeks to form a coalition before his mandate expires, and his options are: let someone else from within his own camp be the prime minister, or become the head of the opposition. Forming a coalition and a government no longer seems a realistic option.
Can you believe it? You’d have to get used to it, but for Netanyahu this will be his third time as head of the opposition. He was there when Prime Ministers Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres ran the country in the early nineties. He was there when Prime Minister Ehud Olmert ran the country until 2009. He might have to readjust to this position, this time while standing trial.
How did this happen? The election forced Netanyahu to find more partners than his usual camp of supporters. He needed to recruit Naftali Bennett’s Yamina party — when Bennett was running to replace him. He needed to retain the support of the hawkish Religious Zionist party. And he needed Islamist Raam to get to more than 60 seats. The short story is that the Religious Zionist party refused to sit with Raam. Netanyahu tried to lure the New Hope party in as substitute, but this also failed. He then floated a new idea: a quick special election only for the job of prime minister. But on Monday, Netanyahu’s bloc was ambushed by the “camp of change” and lost control of forming Knesset committees. Raam closed a deal with opposition leader Yair Lapid and voted against Netanyahu.
That was a final reality check. Netanyahu does not have a majority and is unlikely to have one in the next two weeks. If he does nothing, the other camp will get a shot at forming an uneasy coalition of rivals. Hawkish Bennett and Gideon Saar, centrist Yair Lapid and Avigdor Lieberman, leftist Labor and Meretz and, finally, Islamist Raam. This will be a narrow coalition and one that is ideologically incoherent. Its goal would be to unseat Netanyahu and focus on uncontroversial policies. It might be formed or it might not; it might survive for more than a few months or it might not. Bennett would likely start as the prime minister, followed by Lapid after two years, if the coalition doesn’t collapse under its own weight. Netanyahu is going to blast it daily, calling it a left-wing coalition, denigrating it as illegitimate (Bennett, with seven seats, as the prime minister? It’s not illegitimate, but it is slightly weird).
Netanyahu’s other option is to hand someone else in Likud the key to forming a coalition. But he is smart enough to know that this key will not be easily returned. He is also smart enough to know that being the leader of the opposition is not as powerful a position as being the prime minister. If a Bennett-Lapid government survives for more than a few months, the grumble of Likud members could lead to revolt against him.
Then again, his cards are few and weak. For now, he will prepare for the following scenarios:
Best case (for him): The other coalition also doesn’t form, and Israel goes to a fifth election.
Second best: A coalition forms but collapses after a short time, when Netanyahu still controls Likud.
Third option: Netanyahu is the head of the opposition and has to fight against his rivals’ government, the prosecutors at the court and a revolt within Likud.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Brain Surgery, Film Noir, Accidental Love: Marcus Freed Is Still Out There
Washington’s Promise, America’s Test
Thoughts on Radiation
The October 8th and October 9th Jew
Rethinking Rabbinical Education for a New Era
The Hidden Cost of Campus Antisemitism: Faculty Mental Health
Quo Vadis after October 8th: A Pledge for a New Direction in Memory Politics to End Political Homelessness
Remaining politically homeless is not a defeat; it is a commitment to a truth that refuses to be simplified.
The Crisis in Jewish Education Is Not About Screens
If we want to produce Jews who carry Torah in their bones, we need institutions willing to demand that commitment, and not institutions that blame technology for their own unwillingness to insist on rigor.
Theodor Herzl’s Liberal Nationalist Leap of Hope – and America’s
Herzl recognized nationalism as a powerful but neutral tool, capable of bringing out the best in us – or the beast in us.
Nation of Laws – A poem for Parsha Mishpatim
I live in a nation of laws but the laws seem to change with the flick of a tweet.
Borrowed Spotlight Art Exhibit Pairs Holocaust Survivors with Celebrities
Cindy Crawford, Wolf Blitzer and Chelsea Handler are among the celebrities who were photographed with survivors.
A Bisl Torah — Holy Selfishness
Honoring oneself, creating sacred boundaries, and cultivating self-worth allows a human being to better engage with the world.
A Moment in Time: “Choosing our Move”
Waiting for Religious Intelligence as for AI and Godot
Award-Winning Travel Author Lisa Niver Interviews Churchill Wild Guide Terry Elliott
Print Issue: One Man’s Show | February 6, 2026
How Meir Fenigstein Brings Israeli Stories to the American Screen
Does Tucker Carlson Have His Eye on The White House?
Jason Zengerle, a contributing writer for The New York Times Magazine, and staff writer at the New Yorker wrote a new book about Carlson, “Hated By All The Right People: Tucker Carlson and The Unraveling of The Conservative Mind.”
Michelle Heston: Valentine’s Day, Cake Love & Chocolate Ganache
Taste Buds with Deb – Episode 142
Love Stories – A Persian Love Cake
Love is precious and this Persian Love Cake is the perfect way to show a little love to your friends and family.
Table for Five: Mishpatim
Empathy for Strangers
Meir Fenigstein: One Man’s Show
How Meir Fenigstein Brings Israeli Stories to the American Screen
Rosner’s Domain | In 2026, It’s Right vs. Right
The elections of 2026 will not be “right vs. center-left.” They will be “right vs. right.”
Bret Stephens Has Kicked Off a Long Overdue Debate: Are Jews Fighting the Right Way?
Why is it that despite the enormous resources and money we spend fighting antisemitism, it just keeps getting worse?
Why “More Jewish Education” Keeps Making Things Worse
If we want a different future, we must be willing to examine what already exists, what has failed, and what is quietly working.
Cain and Abel Today
The story of Cain and Abel constitutes a critical and fundamental lesson – we are all children of the covenant with the opportunity to serve each other and to serve God. We are, indeed, each other’s keeper.
Belonging Matters. And Mattering Matters Too.
A society that maximizes belonging while severing it from standards produces conformity, not freedom. A society that encourages mattering divorced from truth produces fanaticism, not dignity. Life and liberty depend on holding the two together.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.