In the wake of last week’s election, the state of Israel now stands at a fateful crossroads. The nation’s leaders must choose between the options of a future with Bibi or, alternatively, a future without him. But either way, the agenda that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has shaped for Israel in the region and in the world will continue for the foreseeable future — with or without Netanyahu himself.
Regardless of which of the top contenders becomes prime minister when the current round of negotiations conclude, Israel will be led by a government increasingly committed to strengthening ties with the Gulf Arab countries but with diminishing interest in achieving peace with the Palestinians. Regardless of whether Netanyahu keeps his current position or is replaced by any of his most plausible successors, Israel will continue to warn the West of the dangers of placating Iran but will also attempt to push negotiations to include agreements on ballistic missiles and terrorist-sponsored activities. And regardless of whether a fifth round of elections becomes necessary, the broader right-leaning orthodoxy that Netanyahu has established on international relations and foreign policy will continue apace. As the pro-Bibi and anti-Bibi coalitions reinforce their battle lines, the most significant differentiator between the two groups is Bibi himself.
There are more pronounced differences on domestic matters, and of course Netanyahu’s own legal fate is directly related to the election’s ultimate outcome. But as it relates to the regional and trans-national issues that will shape Israel’s future, none of the leading contenders for PM are likely to greatly deviate from the current trajectory.
Netanyahu’s chief competitor, Yesh Atid’s Yair Lapid, uses somewhat different language than Netanyahu when he talks about Iran and the Palestinians, but even a Lapid government would not be much different on those fronts than current leadership. The most important differences between Lapid and Bibi are on domestic and religious matters, but Israel’s international agenda would continue mostly along current lines. (If anything, it’s a mark of how far right Israeli politics has shifted in the post-Labor era that Yesh Atid is sometimes described as “center-left.”)
Israel’s other prominent leaders — Naftali Bennett of Yamina, Gideon Sa’ar of the New Hope party, and Benny Gantz of Blue and White — all occupy various patches of conservative turf on the ideological landscape and all split from Netanyahu over personal, religious or domestic policy matters more so than over differences on international or security matters. If a situation emerged in which one of them was able to form a government, meaningful change from Netanyahu’s current course seems even less likely.
This campaign was waged almost exclusively over Netanyahu rather than the future he has framed for the country.
Every election in every country is a referendum on the incumbent. But usually the incumbent’s challengers or potential replacements bring with them some type of ideological shift along with a change of identity. But the unique nature of this campaign is that it was waged almost exclusively over Netanyahu himself rather than the future he has framed for the country. Even the debate over the government’s approach to the coronavirus pandemic seemed less about COVID-19 and more about Bibi. While traditional left-leaning Labor and Meretz have exhibited some signs of life, unless or until they manage to grow their ranks or decide to merge into one left-wing party, the nation’s policy debates will continue to reflect a decidedly Bibi-esque footprint.
We will spend the coming weeks watching the nation’s leaders scramble to develop a workable governing coalition. Given the outsized role that the Arab party Raam may play in the next round of negotiations, it’s currently hard to see the result being anything other than yet one more round of elections for a weary Israeli electorate. But no matter which individual ultimately becomes Israel’s next prime minister, it’s very safe to predict that Bibi-ism will ultimately emerge victorious. The only unknown factor at this point is the identity of the man who will carry Netanyahu’s policy prescriptions for the country into the future.
Dan Schnur teaches political communications at UC Berkeley, USC and Pepperdine. He hosts the weekly webinar “Politics in the Time of Coronavirus” for the Los Angeles World Affairs Council & Town Hall.
PM or Not, Netanyahu’s Agenda Will Continue
Dan Schnur
In the wake of last week’s election, the state of Israel now stands at a fateful crossroads. The nation’s leaders must choose between the options of a future with Bibi or, alternatively, a future without him. But either way, the agenda that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has shaped for Israel in the region and in the world will continue for the foreseeable future — with or without Netanyahu himself.
Regardless of which of the top contenders becomes prime minister when the current round of negotiations conclude, Israel will be led by a government increasingly committed to strengthening ties with the Gulf Arab countries but with diminishing interest in achieving peace with the Palestinians. Regardless of whether Netanyahu keeps his current position or is replaced by any of his most plausible successors, Israel will continue to warn the West of the dangers of placating Iran but will also attempt to push negotiations to include agreements on ballistic missiles and terrorist-sponsored activities. And regardless of whether a fifth round of elections becomes necessary, the broader right-leaning orthodoxy that Netanyahu has established on international relations and foreign policy will continue apace. As the pro-Bibi and anti-Bibi coalitions reinforce their battle lines, the most significant differentiator between the two groups is Bibi himself.
There are more pronounced differences on domestic matters, and of course Netanyahu’s own legal fate is directly related to the election’s ultimate outcome. But as it relates to the regional and trans-national issues that will shape Israel’s future, none of the leading contenders for PM are likely to greatly deviate from the current trajectory.
Netanyahu’s chief competitor, Yesh Atid’s Yair Lapid, uses somewhat different language than Netanyahu when he talks about Iran and the Palestinians, but even a Lapid government would not be much different on those fronts than current leadership. The most important differences between Lapid and Bibi are on domestic and religious matters, but Israel’s international agenda would continue mostly along current lines. (If anything, it’s a mark of how far right Israeli politics has shifted in the post-Labor era that Yesh Atid is sometimes described as “center-left.”)
Israel’s other prominent leaders — Naftali Bennett of Yamina, Gideon Sa’ar of the New Hope party, and Benny Gantz of Blue and White — all occupy various patches of conservative turf on the ideological landscape and all split from Netanyahu over personal, religious or domestic policy matters more so than over differences on international or security matters. If a situation emerged in which one of them was able to form a government, meaningful change from Netanyahu’s current course seems even less likely.
Every election in every country is a referendum on the incumbent. But usually the incumbent’s challengers or potential replacements bring with them some type of ideological shift along with a change of identity. But the unique nature of this campaign is that it was waged almost exclusively over Netanyahu himself rather than the future he has framed for the country. Even the debate over the government’s approach to the coronavirus pandemic seemed less about COVID-19 and more about Bibi. While traditional left-leaning Labor and Meretz have exhibited some signs of life, unless or until they manage to grow their ranks or decide to merge into one left-wing party, the nation’s policy debates will continue to reflect a decidedly Bibi-esque footprint.
We will spend the coming weeks watching the nation’s leaders scramble to develop a workable governing coalition. Given the outsized role that the Arab party Raam may play in the next round of negotiations, it’s currently hard to see the result being anything other than yet one more round of elections for a weary Israeli electorate. But no matter which individual ultimately becomes Israel’s next prime minister, it’s very safe to predict that Bibi-ism will ultimately emerge victorious. The only unknown factor at this point is the identity of the man who will carry Netanyahu’s policy prescriptions for the country into the future.
Dan Schnur teaches political communications at UC Berkeley, USC and Pepperdine. He hosts the weekly webinar “Politics in the Time of Coronavirus” for the Los Angeles World Affairs Council & Town Hall.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Chosen Links – Colleges and Passover Edition – April 25, 2024
Nova Festival Exhibit in Manhattan Harrowing and Inspiring
Steve Garvey Holds Press Conference Calling for Action Against Pro-Palestinian Campus Protests
West Hollywood’s MASH Gallery Exhibition to Feature Female Jewish Art
Echad Mi Yodea? Who Knows One?
The First Alphabet and the Third Plague
Culture
Beth Lee: OMG Yummy, Exciting Flavors and Preserved Lemons
Passover Breakfast
Dr. Nicole Saphier on Motherhood and Jewish Advocacy
Friendship Warms the Heart of ‘The Bespoke Overcoat’
A Bisl Torah – The Fifth Child
Perhaps, since October 7th, a fifth generation has surfaced. Young Jews determining how (not if) Jewish tradition and beliefs will play a role in their own identity and the future identities of their children.
A Moment in Time: “A Week without Bread: Do we Really Kneed It?”
Passover Amid Pain: Families of Hostages Mark 200 Days Since Abductions
Given the difficult times that Israelis — and Jews worldwide — are currently living through, it can be challenging to navigate the holidays
Robin Finn Helps Women Find Their Voice on the Page
“Too many women think their stories are not important or their voice doesn’t matter, which could not be further from the truth.”
MAZON Holds Its 15th Annual Hunger Seder
On April 11, MAZON: A Jewish Response to Hunger held its 15th annual National Hunger Seder on Capitol Hill.
Hollywood
Spielberg Says Antisemitism Is “No Longer Lurking, But Standing Proud” Like 1930s Germany
Young Actress Juju Brener on Her “Hocus Pocus 2” Role
Behind the Scenes of “Jeopardy!” with Mayim Bialik
Podcasts
Beth Lee: OMG Yummy, Exciting Flavors and Preserved Lemons
Shani Seidman: Manischewitz, Passover Memories and Matzo Brei
More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.