
Rosner’s Domain | Five Comments about the War as a Balancing Act
American backing is essential as long as it doesn’t mean that Israel is going to compromise on its main objectives.
Shmuel Rosner is an Israeli columnist, editor, and researcher. He is the editor of the research and data-journalism website themadad.com, and is the political editor of the Jewish Journal.
American backing is essential as long as it doesn’t mean that Israel is going to compromise on its main objectives.
The most difficult day in Israel’s history is behind us, and very difficult days — hopefully not equally difficult, or more difficult — are still ahead of us.
A war for a degree of separation of religion and state is not a religious war.
It’s a discourse of people who live in parallel universes: those who regard what happened as an enraging sabotage of a Yom Kippur prayer, and those who regard it as a provocation masquerading as a Yom Kippur prayer.
Fifty years have passed, but in Israel it is still impossible to disentangle the tremble and awe of Yom Kippur from the trauma of the 1973 Yom Kippur War.
On Tuesday, Israel’s High Court convened to hear the case for and against striking down the so-called “reasonableness law,” that would curb the top court’s power to exercise judicial review over government decisions.
Rather than solving problems, Israel shelves them, to be dealt with maybe next year, or by the next government, or when the next crisis materializes.
The crime rate — and murder rate — of Arab Israelis has more than doubled this year. And Israel doesn’t seem ready to enact the type of measures that could tame this violent wave.
What kind of arrangement can move Israel from a state of storm to a state of calm?
If Israel loses the IDF as a People’s Army, this will have practical and symbolic consequences.