“He finished speaking with him on Mount Sinai.”
With these words, the riverlike stream of prophecy, which has coursed through the past two and half Torah portions, ceases flowing. Suddenly, we are jolted back into reality.
The Torah’s next words further intensify this sense of coming to. “The people saw that Moses was late in coming down from the mountain.” Restored to our senses, we are forced to confront the fact that while we have been swept up in the divine word, we have in fact been standing here on the craggy peak of Mount Sinai the whole time, with the people of Israel below us, unremembered and unremarked by the text.
During Moses’ time on the mountain, the Israelites assumed his absence meant that he had abandoned them. Among child psychologists, this would be called an anxious, rather than a secure, attachment style. The securely attached child will cry when their caregiver departs, but will soon calm down, confident that their caregiver will, in time, return. The anxiously attached child has no such confidence in the future. Every departure is experienced as the last.
It is this anxious attachment that leads the Israelites into the sin of idolatry. The story of the golden calf is well-known and hardly needs to be recounted. Its images — the debauched bacchanal of the Israelites around their golden god and Moses shattering the tablets on the ground in anger — are burned in our memory as eternal symbols of transgression and its consequences.
What is perhaps less familiar is the aftermath of this affair, a narrative whose images are subtler but no less powerful. The second half of the parashah is about estrangement and the ways in which God, Moses and the Israelites haltingly find their way back to one another. Where previously we had lost our sense of space and time in the act of revelation, now we are hyperaware of both. Distance and duration are central to this reconciliation narrative.
Distance and duration are central to this reconciliation narrative.
“Whenever Moses went out to the Tent of Meeting, all the people would rise and stand, each at the entrance of his tent, and gaze after Moses until he had entered the Tent.” In this sweet and melancholy image, the anxiously attached Israelites stare at the figure of Moses from a distance, too terrified by the prospect of his disappearance to let him out of their sight.
Moses, meanwhile, is unready to forgive the Israelites himself. This doesn’t mean he has forgotten them. He works tirelessly to secure their forgiveness from God. When God assents, Moses is enraptured and exclaims: “Oh, let me behold Your Presence!”
But no human can see God’s face and live. God therefore devises a way to be both seen and not seen, like a silhouette through a screen. He tells Moses to position himself in the cleft of a boulder. “I will shield you with My hand until I have passed by. Then I will take My hand away and you will see My back; but My face must not be seen.”
More than a golden calf or shattered tablets, it is a turned back that is the main image of Parashat Ki Tisa. Looking down from the mountain, God sees that the Israelites have turned their backs to Him. Looking out from their tents, the Israelites watch Moses’s back as he walks to the Tent of Meeting. And now, tucked into this crevice of stone, Moses sees God’s back as He passes.
As with an infant watching its mother when she leaves the room, all of this back-gazing is a training session in secure attachment. The Israelites are learning what it means to be a people with a God — to trust that He is mindful of them even when He can’t be seen. God, for His part, is learning what it means to be a God with a people, bound to forever turn back, no matter how many times He looks away.
Matthew Schultz is the author of the essay collection “What Came Before” (2020). He is a rabbinical student at Hebrew College in Newton, Massachusetts.
Unscrolled, Ki Tisa: When the Jews and God Turned Back
Matthew Schultz
“He finished speaking with him on Mount Sinai.”
With these words, the riverlike stream of prophecy, which has coursed through the past two and half Torah portions, ceases flowing. Suddenly, we are jolted back into reality.
The Torah’s next words further intensify this sense of coming to. “The people saw that Moses was late in coming down from the mountain.” Restored to our senses, we are forced to confront the fact that while we have been swept up in the divine word, we have in fact been standing here on the craggy peak of Mount Sinai the whole time, with the people of Israel below us, unremembered and unremarked by the text.
During Moses’ time on the mountain, the Israelites assumed his absence meant that he had abandoned them. Among child psychologists, this would be called an anxious, rather than a secure, attachment style. The securely attached child will cry when their caregiver departs, but will soon calm down, confident that their caregiver will, in time, return. The anxiously attached child has no such confidence in the future. Every departure is experienced as the last.
It is this anxious attachment that leads the Israelites into the sin of idolatry. The story of the golden calf is well-known and hardly needs to be recounted. Its images — the debauched bacchanal of the Israelites around their golden god and Moses shattering the tablets on the ground in anger — are burned in our memory as eternal symbols of transgression and its consequences.
What is perhaps less familiar is the aftermath of this affair, a narrative whose images are subtler but no less powerful. The second half of the parashah is about estrangement and the ways in which God, Moses and the Israelites haltingly find their way back to one another. Where previously we had lost our sense of space and time in the act of revelation, now we are hyperaware of both. Distance and duration are central to this reconciliation narrative.
“Whenever Moses went out to the Tent of Meeting, all the people would rise and stand, each at the entrance of his tent, and gaze after Moses until he had entered the Tent.” In this sweet and melancholy image, the anxiously attached Israelites stare at the figure of Moses from a distance, too terrified by the prospect of his disappearance to let him out of their sight.
Moses, meanwhile, is unready to forgive the Israelites himself. This doesn’t mean he has forgotten them. He works tirelessly to secure their forgiveness from God. When God assents, Moses is enraptured and exclaims: “Oh, let me behold Your Presence!”
But no human can see God’s face and live. God therefore devises a way to be both seen and not seen, like a silhouette through a screen. He tells Moses to position himself in the cleft of a boulder. “I will shield you with My hand until I have passed by. Then I will take My hand away and you will see My back; but My face must not be seen.”
More than a golden calf or shattered tablets, it is a turned back that is the main image of Parashat Ki Tisa. Looking down from the mountain, God sees that the Israelites have turned their backs to Him. Looking out from their tents, the Israelites watch Moses’s back as he walks to the Tent of Meeting. And now, tucked into this crevice of stone, Moses sees God’s back as He passes.
As with an infant watching its mother when she leaves the room, all of this back-gazing is a training session in secure attachment. The Israelites are learning what it means to be a people with a God — to trust that He is mindful of them even when He can’t be seen. God, for His part, is learning what it means to be a God with a people, bound to forever turn back, no matter how many times He looks away.
Matthew Schultz is the author of the essay collection “What Came Before” (2020). He is a rabbinical student at Hebrew College in Newton, Massachusetts.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Gaza Masquerade Parties Can’t Mask Ugliness
By Putting Feelings Before Truth, Universities Created a Time Bomb
Taste Buds with Deb Celebrates One Year, A Triple Chai of Eps
The Nazis at George Washington U.
Elisha Wiesel and the Elie Wiesel Foundation Host Disrupting Uyghur Genocide Conference
John Ondrasik, Jonah Platt Highlight AJC, ADL Press Briefing at UCLA Hillel
Culture
Chico Menashe: Asif: Culinary Institute of Israel, Cooking with Chutzpah and The Open Kitchen Project
Welcome Back, Carbs!
A Perfect Pair of Confits
‘The Enemy Beside Me’: Can the Truth of Lithuania Holocaust History Be Told in Lithuania to Lithuanians and By Lithuanians?
Shabbat Prayer for Our College Students and Ourselves
1,400 Yizkors
In their memory, we must declare: Am Yisrael Chai.
Being Good is Easier to Resist than Sweezy vs New Hampshire
A Bisl Torah – Souls Connected
It is each soul connected to each other that enables the dwelling of God.
All the Fish in the Sea – A poem for Parsha Acharei Mot
There are plenty of fish in the sea …
Hollywood
Spielberg Says Antisemitism Is “No Longer Lurking, But Standing Proud” Like 1930s Germany
Young Actress Juju Brener on Her “Hocus Pocus 2” Role
Behind the Scenes of “Jeopardy!” with Mayim Bialik
Podcasts
Chico Menashe: Asif: Culinary Institute of Israel, Cooking with Chutzpah and The Open Kitchen Project
Beth Lee: OMG Yummy, Exciting Flavors and Preserved Lemons
More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.