fbpx

NYT Criticized for Romanticizing Iranian Nuclear Scientist

The Times tweeted: “Despite his prominent position, Iran's top nuclear scientist wanted to live a normal life. He loved reading poetry, taking his family to the seashore and driving his own car..."
[additional-authors]
September 20, 2021
Handout / Getty Images

The New York Times is being criticized for allegedly romanticizing a top nuclear scientist for the Iranian government who was killed in November 2020.

The Times reported that the scientist, Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, was killed by a remote-controlled machine gun that fired at the vehicle in which he was traveling at the time. The report states that the Israeli government was likely behind the assassination, as Fakhrizadeh was considered to be the mastermind behind Iran’s nuclear program.

In a September 18 tweet promoting the story, the Times tweeted: “Despite his prominent position, Iran’s top nuclear scientist wanted to live a normal life. He loved reading poetry, taking his family to the seashore and driving his own car instead of having bodyguards drive him in an armored vehicle.”

Former Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon, who currently chairs World Likud, tweeted, “If you ask the @nytimes, Fahrizade was a poetry-loving family man. They ‘forget’ to mention that he was developing nuclear weapons with the ultimate goal of destroying the USA and Israel.”

Other Jewish and pro-Israel Twitter users also denounced the tweet.

“Unbelievable this [New York Times] tweet remains up,” Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblatt tweeted. “Absolutely disgraceful to romanticize Fakhrizadeh as a ‘lover of poetry.’ Who cares about his hobbies when he made clear his true passion project was the annihilation of the only Jewish state in the world.”

American Jewish Committee CEO David Harris similarly wrote that the Times tweet is “a new low for the paper.” “Apart from a key role in Iran’s goal of destroying Israel, he ‘wanted to live a normal life.’ Hey, as long as he loved poetry & the beach, why allow the planned murder of 9 million people to detract from his life story?”

Human rights lawyer Arsen Ostrovksy, who heads the International Legal Forum, also tweeted: “I can only shudder at how [The New York Times] would have described Hitler today: ‘Despite his prominent position, the Nazi leader wanted to live a normal life. He was a vegetarian, loved art and reading poetry, and was a doting uncle.’”

Adam Kredo, reporter for the conservative website Washington Free Beacon, noted that the Times reporter who wrote the story “recently had two formal complaints filed against her for pro-Iran bias and multiple faculties inaccuracies” and linked to a story he had written on the matter.

The Times did not respond to the Journal’s request for comment.

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Editor's Picks

A Night of Gratitude Honoring Dennis Prager

Latest Articles

Print Issue: What Happened? | November 13, 2026

A story of bipartisan support that gradually became a story of one-party support, until it flips entirely and becomes once again a story of consensus – this time, of bipartisan opposition.

Why Are We Even Here?

When we’re tempted to ask, Lamah zeh anochi? — Why am I here? What’s the point? — we can remind ourselves of the extraordinary goodness that exists in the world. And, even more importantly, we can become part of it.

Leo David Honored as FIDF Gala Raises

Throughout the years, David has donated millions of dollars to numerous causes, but FIDF has always held a particularly special place in his heart.

What If Jewish Americans Just Showed Up?

We mourn on Oct. 7, but Nov. 8 gave us something to celebrate: a community that showed up, on its feet, public and proud. Now we need to make that response a habit.

Genocide and International Relations

The book casts its net far and wide, from debates within the field of research itself to the analysis of genocidal events across the past century.

A Concrete Case for Hope

Over the last few weeks, Americans and Israelis voted in elections that are consequential to the characters of both countries. For many, these elections represent inflection points, where the outcome signals the directions their respective societies will take moving forward.

AIPAC Isn’t the Problem. It’s Part of the Solution.

The future of the U.S.-Israel relationship will not be secured by winning one more primary. It will depend on whether Americans understand why Israel matters, why Jewish self-determination is legitimate, and why the alliance benefits both nations.

The Last Signer

Carroll, having helped swing Maryland toward independence, was elected to Congress on July 4, and signed the Declaration in August, the only Catholic among the signers and the only one to add his estate to his name.

Torah Portion: Toldot

The parsha begins with a direct statement: “This is the story of Isaac, son of Abraham.”  

Faith and the Power of Pretend

Rabbi Kushner provides a path for elevating our humanity, appreciating the wisdom of Jewish tradition and practice, and experiencing the divinity residing within all humans, even those who do not yet acknowledge God’s presence.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.