fbpx

August 9, 2026

Shocking, Alarming News: The Jews Didn’t Do It!

There’s an important piece of grossly underpublicized information you missed last month. Don’t worry. It wasn’t your fault. No mass media outlet believed it was in the public interest for you to know and worth your attention.

It wasn’t as if the news lacked a credible source or had no relevance to the news of the day. In fact, it would have debunked a falsehood about an allegedly heinous crime, contradicting the basic premise of a story that has held captive the imagination of the general public for three years.

But why change ideological direction? Why be compelled to print a retraction? Why create more reasons to disbelieve the reporting of mainstream media?

This week’s undisclosed shocker: What you have been told, and conditioned to believe, about the starvation of children in Gaza was false from the outset. A nutrition survey, recently released and coordinated by UNICEF, reveals that there has been no malnutrition in Gaza. Indeed, at least with respect to children, it remains at historically low levels.

No more reliable source for such matters exists than UNICEF. It is the arm of the United Nations whose sole mission is to advocate for children’s rights. Among its most important mandate: combatting child malnutrition.

Still skeptical, given the bombardment of blood libels against Israel? The survey, data results and measurement methods were conducted by the World Health Organization (WHO). The WHO measured weight, height, and mid-upper-arm circumference. Apparently, that’s how acute food scarcity is determined.

Malnutrition among the children of Gaza ranged from 0.2 percent in Khan Younis and Rafah to 0.8 percent in Gaza City—that’s less than 1% across the entire enclave! Those numbers are actually lower than what was recorded before Hamas massacred Israelis on October 7, 2023, which led to the war that almost instantly was redefined as a coordinated campaign to kill and starve Palestinian children.

The children of Gaza were more malnourished when there was no war and Hamas was entirely in charge of feeding its people. During the war, Israel’s supply of humanitarian aid actually increased the calorie count. Yet another example of how Hamas is responsible for Gaza’s suffering, and not Israel.

The children of Gaza were more malnourished when there was no war and Hamas was entirely in charge of feeding its people. During the war, Israel’s supply of humanitarian aid actually increased the calorie count.

This was not a small sample size, either. The survey measured 1.72 million people, or 83 percent of Gaza’s population. We now know that the food supply for the children of Gaza is 30% higher than it is for children in neighboring countries—even when compared to some European nations!

Egyptian children suffer from vastly higher levels of malnutrition at 3.3%; in Iran, 4.3%; and in Jordan, 2.3%.

And beyond the Middle East? There’s less starvation among Gazan children than there is in Germany and Finland.

What in the world are Mark Ruffalo, Javier Bardem and Emma Stone talking about?

Israel is fighting a defensive war to establish deterrence against terrorists who still openly threaten them with repeat performances of 10/7.  The children of Gaza are being used as human shields, largely with the blessing of their parents (why else would anyone ignore Israel’s warnings to dash over to humanitarian corridors, rather than remain in buildings designated for destruction?). And by all accounts from nongovernmental organizations charged with measuring child welfare, Gaza’s children are not lacking in food.

Perhaps when antisemites are repeatedly screaming “genocide!” and “starvation!” in your face, and the media has no interest in reporting the truth, one can either fall for the lie or have their worst biases confirmed.

Perhaps when antisemites are repeatedly screaming “genocide!” and “starvation!” in your face, and the media has no interest in reporting the truth, one can either fall for the lie or have their worst biases confirmed.

Which raises the question: Why, throughout all recorded history, is it customary, if not outright incumbent, to blame Jews for anything that might go wrong? There is a universal predisposition to believe that the worst possible calamities—the most diabolical plots and dastardly deeds—have been committed by Jews.

The fact that the indictments are preposterous and beyond rational belief matters little. There’s never an impulse to seek another opinion.

“The Jews did it!” has been so omnipresent in history, it’s about time we cut out the middleman and change scapegoats to scape-Jews.

Jews killed Jesus. They unleashed rats that caused the Black Death. All plagues began with Jews poisoning wells. (Jews were dying, too, but why introduce logic and undermine the smear?)  Jews kidnapped Christian children and used their blood to make matzoh—the original blood libel.

Jews insinuated themselves inside host countries, bringing down economies and manipulating markets. It’s right there, explained in the book “Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” a known forgery and hoax that has riveted and galvanized Jew-haters for over a hundred years.

Jews financed the slave trade. They were slumlords, rendering people homeless. Jews control banks and Hollywood. They cause wars and have wars fought on their behalf alone. Jews were responsible for both capitalism and communism.

No conspiracy theory was ever conceived without a Jewish component. Jack Ruby, a Jew, killed Lee Harvey Oswald. President Nixon blamed Jewish journalists for his downfall. Jewish neoconservatives pushed America into its post-9/11 wars with Afghanistan and Iraq.

Even in art, Jews don’t fare well: Fagin corrupts and exploits children in Charles Dickens’ “Oliver Twist”; Shylock, the money lender, bleeds Christians of their money, and blood, in Shakespeare’s “The Merchant of Venice”; Barabas is motivated by greed and out for revenge in Christopher Marlowe’s “The Jew of Malta”; Isaac of York is no great exemplar of Jewish virtue in Walter Scott’s “Ivanhoe.”

Bernie Madoff and Jeffrey Epstein have surely not helped the cause of reversing these pernicious stereotypes, either.

When it comes to Israel, preposterous allegations shift into ludicrous speed. The IDF trains dogs to sexually assault and rape Palestinian prisoners. In wartime, they deliberately target women and children. The IDF intentionally fires bullets at the legs of children, so as to maim them. Israel poisons the water supply in Gaza and the West Bank. Israeli scientists harvest Palestinian organs!

The picture of an emaciated Palestinian boy— dying of an incurable disease — was featured on the cover of the New York Times as ostensibly a victim of Israeli cruelty. Back in 2000, a 12-year-old boy caught in a crossfire in Gaza was purportedly killed by Israeli bullets, but years later the evidence suggested that the bullets were fired by Hamas.

And the granddaddy of all blood libels: On October 8, 2023, for no reason at all other than its vile Zionist nature, Israel set forth to commit genocide against the Palestinian people, through bombs and mass starvation, without managing to kill terrorists—just women and children.

A people perpetually faced with threats of being driven into the sea and wiped from the map have no other national purpose other than to kill Palestinians—a people who didn’t even exist back when Israel was created.

No benefit of the doubt seems to ever be given to Jews. Mass media publishes casualty counts supplied by Hamas, without its own sourcing or independent verification. No one bothered to ask UNICEF about the alleged food deficiencies among the children in Gaza.

No benefit of the doubt seems to ever be given to Jews. Mass media publishes casualty counts supplied by Hamas, without its own sourcing or independent verification. No one bothered to ask UNICEF about the alleged food deficiencies among the children in Gaza.

But if UNICEF had released its findings two years ago, when the war in Gaza was at its peak, would such unqualified evidence in rebuttal have made front-page, top-of-the hour news?  If it had been reported, would it have mattered to protesters—who, despite being on college campuses, refused to read, and refused to know?


Thane Rosenbaum is a novelist, essayist, law professor and Distinguished University Professor at Touro University, where he directs the Forum on Life, Culture & Society. He is a contributing writer for White Rose magazine. His most recent book is titled, “Beyond Proportionality: Israel’s Just War in Gaza.

Shocking, Alarming News: The Jews Didn’t Do It! Read More »

Jewish Democrats Caught Between Devil and Deep Blue Sea

Before the invention of the steam engine, when ocean travel relied on sails and wind, sailors would talk about the choice between dangerous and disastrous alternatives as being caught “between the devil and the deep blue sea.” After the victory of Abdul El-Sayed in last week’s Senate primary, Jewish voters in Michigan are about to become very familiar with this type of predicament.

As we have highlighted in this space before, El-Sayed is an avowed anti-Zionist and anti-Semite. He refuses to say publicly whether he believes that Israel has a right to exist and draws a moral equivalency between what he calls the “evil” of Israel and Hamas. Most chillingly, after a gunman attacked a Jewish preschool and daycare center in a Detroit suburb earlier this year that was characterized by the FBI as a “Hezbollah-inspired act of terrorism”, El-Sayed suggested that the attempted mass homicide of Jewish toddlers and infants was an understandable response to Israeli military strikes in Lebanon. “Hurt people hurt people,” he said, glibly and grotesquely.

El-Sayed enjoys the company and the support of some of the most virulent Jew-haters on the political landscape today, campaigning frequently and proudly with social media demagogue Hasan Piker. El-Sayed has stated that he does not endorse Piker’s proclamation that “America deserved 9/11” or that Hamas “is a thousand times better” than Israel, but he has refused to distance himself or cut ties with the streamer.

Extrapolating from national exit polls, we can assume that between two-thirds and three-quarters of Michigan’s Jewish community voted for Kamala Harris in 2024. These are the voters caught between the aforementioned devil and ocean, who are now deciding whether Al-Sayed or Donald Trump is a less dreadful alternative for them. For a Jewish Democrat, there is no good option, only bad and worse. Depending on how they decide which of the two men is merely bad will carry immense political ramifications far beyond Michigan’s borders.

If Al-Sayed wins, then his noxious bigotry will be given an unavoidable national platform in the U.S. Senate for the next six years and the anti-Israel wing of the Democratic Party will be tremendously energized heading into the 2028 presidential primaries. If defections from Jewish and Black voters, who supported his primary opponent by sizable margins, cost him the election in November, then the GOP will almost certainly retain its majority in the Senate. For Democrats who watched Senate Republicans meekly fall into line to confirm Trump’s personal lawyer as the nation’s Attorney General last week, the prospect of Trump’s last two years in office abetted by an perpetually obsequious Congress is just as unacceptable.

Most Democrats will tell you that they believe that Trump is a dictator who represents a threat to their country. Most Jews will tell you that Al-Sayed is a bigot who represents a threat to their people. Is an anti-Semite in the Senate an acceptable tradeoff for a less pliant majority? That will be the question that decides this campaign in November.

Jewish Democrats, in Michigan and elsewhere, who are tempted to support Al-Sayed given the stakes outlined above may consider that their support could come with conditions. Some have already said that they will not back his candidacy unless he publicly separates from Piker and refuses to campaign with him. Many more should do the same. They should also demand that Al-Sayed endorse bipartisan legislation co-sponsored by Michigan’s other Senator, Elissa Slotkin, an avowed pro-Israel advocate. Slotkin and Republican Ted Cruz have introduced a bill that would protect synagogues and other houses of worship from violent and disruptive protests by establishing a 100-foot buffer zone during religious services.

Zohran Mamdani opposed a similar measure in New York City this spring. Let’s see if Al-Sayed is more motivated toward compromise – and to protecting religious freedom and safety – with his political future on the line. Those steps alone should not justify a vote for this man, but they are a minimal and necessary opening proffer from someone who will need to work diligently to gain the grudging trust of even the most committed Jewish Democrats.


Dan Schnur is the U.S. Politics Editor for the Jewish Journal. He teaches courses in politics, communications, and leadership at UC Berkeley, USC and Pepperdine. He hosts the monthly webinar “The Dan Schnur Political Report” for the Los Angeles World Affairs Council & Town Hall. Follow Dan’s work at www.danschnurpolitics.com

Jewish Democrats Caught Between Devil and Deep Blue Sea Read More »