fbpx

June 18, 2020

The Jewish Scientists Who Found the Keys to Our Body’s Defenses

Jewish Contributions to Humanity #8:
Original research by Walter L. Field.
Sponsored by Irwin S. Field.


ELIE METCHNIKOFF (1845-1916). b. Panasovka, Russia.  Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1908. White blood cells — our first line of defense.

After obtaining his four-year natural sciences degree in only two years at Kharkiv University, Elie Metchnikoff began work in a private lab in Messina, Italy in 1882. There, he noticed a reaction in starfishes when he stuck small thorns into them—white cells would inflame the affected area and then surround, attack, and literally devour the invader. These defensive cells were named “phagocytes,” and although Metchnikoff’s findings were initially met with skepticism, he was awarded a Nobel Prize in 1908 for his discovery of this key element of organisms’ innate immune system—the body’s first line of defense. Metchnikoff’s research into lactic acid also began the widely popular probiotics movement. He theorized that ingestion of certain bacteria—often found in types of yogurt and milk—could prolong life.


OTTO LOEWI (1873-1961). b. Frankfurt, Germany. Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1936. Identifying how our brain communicates with our body.

Initially an aspiring clinician, Otto Loewi switched to research after he arrived at the painful conclusion that modern medicine had no treatment for people with advanced tuberculosis and pneumonia. That shift revolutionized human medicine. Loewi, bucking the conventional scientific wisdom of his time, discovered that neurons can communicate with each other through chemical reactions—not only electrical signals. This discovery of neurochemical transmission was instrumental in pharmacology, pathology, psychiatry, and countless other medical fields. Suspecting that chemicals played an intimate role in neuro-communication, Loewi took two beating frog hearts and covered them both in saline solution. He stimulated the vagus nerve of one of the hearts, thus slowing down its heart rate. He then transferred some of the saline from that heart on to the other heart, which in turn slowed down that heart’s rate, proving that there was a chemical—not only an electric impulse—released by the vagus nerve that impacted cell and neuron behavior. That chemical, or neurotransmitter, is now known as acetylcholine.


JOSHUA LEDERBERG (1925-2008). b. Montclair, New Jersey. Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1958. Explaining bacterial resistance.

Graduating high school at 15 and receiving his Nobel Prize only 18 years later, Joshua Lederberg’s genetic research made him one of molecular biology’s foundational scientists. A zoologist and doctor by training, Lederberg bucked most scientists of his time, who believed that bacteria pass down exact genetic copies to their offspring. In the late 1940s Lederberg showed that bacteria transfer and share DNA among themselves, creating offspring with different genes that are better adapted for that specific environment. The discovery had massive implications for biotechnology, genetics, and pharmacology, particularly in understanding how bacteria develop resistance to drugs. Lederberg went on to chair the genetics department at Stanford, write regular science columns for the Washington Post, and advise several U.S. presidents and NASA.

The Jewish Scientists Who Found the Keys to Our Body’s Defenses Read More »

Long Before Dr. Phil, These Jewish Psychologists Were Unmasking the Human Mind

Jewish Contributions to Humanity #7:
Original research by Walter L. Field.
Sponsored by Irwin S. Field.


SIGMUND FREUD  (1856-1939). b. Vienna, Austria.  Modern psychology’s father.

A revolutionary neurologist, psychiatrist and psychotherapist, Sigmund Freud was one of the most influential thinkers in terms of how we understand human nature. He’s known as the father of modern psychoanalysis, a field that mines the mind and how it’s shaped by childhood experiences, parental relationships, repression, and the subconscious. Born in what is now the Czech Republic, Freud lived most of his life in Vienna before fleeing to London in 1938, dying one year later of cancer. He left us with a treasure of insights into the mind, including his remarkable theory that the human psyche is composed of base nature (the id), ego (the “I”) and super-ego (moral conscience), and also the discovery that unresolved or repressed mental conflicts enter our subconscious, where they still impact us but in ways that could be difficult to pinpoint or understand. It’s no understatement to say he was one of the most influential people of the 20th century.


THEODOR REIK (1888-1969). b. Vienna, Austria. Freud’s protégé.

One of Freud’s first students, Reik, upon his immigration to America, was rejected at that time by the psychoanalytic community because he didn’t possess a degree in medicine. Soon thereafter he created the National Psychological Association for Psychoanalysis – which exists to this day in New York City – and participated in one of the first lawsuits that helped establish that non-physicians may practice psychoanalysis. His most impactful and lasting contributions came in the fields of the therapist-patient relationship and criminology. In the former, he elucidated how a psychotherapist can plum the depths of his or her own subconscious to better understand and treat patients and how therapists can become emotionally entangled with their patients. Reik also theorized that psychologically profiling criminals can help authorities identify and locate them, in part because out of an unconscious guilt criminals will sometimes leave clues that lead to their own capture.


ERICH FROMM (1900-1980). b. Frankfurt, Germany. The political psychologist.Heavily influenced by the Torah and Talmud in his early years but eventually becoming an atheist, Fromm was one of the 20th century’s most influential psychologists and sociologists—someone whose political thinking was deeply impacted by Marx and who was one of the unofficial founders of the field of political psychology. One of Fromm’s greatest insights, described in his seminal book, “Escape From Freedom”, is that humans will either embrace free will or run from it. Running from freedom, he believed, was a source of many psychological pathologies. Those who eschew free will, he believed, either conform to what they believe is society’s preferred personality, give over their free will to others, or engage in destructive behaviors towards others, effectively taking away other peoples’ freedom. In “Man for Himself”, Fromm put forward his belief that one of the core paradoxes of human existence is that we look for closeness and unity with others and an independent identity at the same time. The solution to this paradox, Fromm wrote, is to be oriented productively; that is, to have a purpose-driven life and to channel one’s talents into productive ends.

Long Before Dr. Phil, These Jewish Psychologists Were Unmasking the Human Mind Read More »

Rosner’s Torah Talk: Parshat Selach with Rabbis Pavolotzky and Szuster

Rabbi Rami Pavolotzky and Rabbi Daniela Szuster joined Temple Beth El in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, in 2015. The married couple relocated from San Jose, Costa Rica, where they served as co-rabbis of Congregation B’Nei Israel since 2004. Rabbis Pavolotzky and Szuster were the first full-time rabbis to serve their small congregation in Costa Rica. Together, they launched a number of programs during their tenure at Congregation B’Nei Israel and increased membership by more than 50 percent.

In Parshat Shelach, Moses sends twelve spies to the land of Canaan. When they return, they report that the land is plentiful – but also that the inhabitants of the land are giants and warriors. The people weep that they’d rather return to Egypt – then fight. G‑d decrees that Israel’s entry into the Land shall be delayed forty years, during which time that entire generation will die out in the desert. Also in this parsha, G‑d instructs to place fringes (tzitzit) on the four corners of our garments, to remind us of the mitzvot (commandments).

Previous Torah Talks on Shelach

Rabbi Michael Melchior

Rabbi Jeffrey Arnowitz

Rabbi Debra Newman Kamin

Rabbi Shana Mackler

Rabbi Marci Bellows

Rabbi Benji Stanley

Rabbi Tamar Elad Appelbaum

 

 

Rosner’s Torah Talk: Parshat Selach with Rabbis Pavolotzky and Szuster Read More »

Meet the Jewish Parents of Superman and Wonder Woman

Jewish Contributions to Humanity #6:
Original research by Walter L. Field.
Sponsored by Irwin S. Field.


Jerry Siegel  (1914-1996). b. Cleveland, Ohio.  Mr. Superman.

Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster

A scrawny, unpopular, bespectacled high school student in Cleveland, Jerry Siegel thought up Superman one night in 1934 as a solution to a problem common to so many high school boys—girls. As he said in an interview 40 years later, he thought he’d have better luck if he could do things like jump over buildings and throw cars. Enter Superman. A journalist by day, superhero by night, and a character on which Siegel could place both Lois Lane’s yearning and apathy. She was drawn to Superman, but ignored Clark Kent—her coworker at The Daily Planet—failing to see him for the hero he really was. Siegel and his friend, comic partner and illustrator Joe Shuster spent a few years searching for a buyer for their hero, when in 1938 they sold all rights for Superman to DC Comics…for $130—$10 for each of the 13 pages. The pair continued writing and illustrating Superman for nearly a decade, but when they sued for a share of profits in 1946, DC Comics refused and fired them, instead settling for a one-time $94,000 payment. Siegel wrote again for DC Comics for a few years in the 1960s, but the company eventually let him go, later restoring Siegel’s and Shuster’s bylines—after the former launched a public relations campaign—paying them each a lifetime annuity of $20,000, which was eventually raised to $30,000. In 2013, the original check that DC Comics wrote to Siegel and Shuster (it was $130 for the rights and $282 for their first actual comic) sold at auction for $160,000.


Joe Shuster (1914-1992). b. Toronto, Canada. Mr. Superman.

The other man behind Superman was as integral as Siegel in revolutionizing one of America’s great art forms, which was only five years old when Shuster and Siegel created Superman. Born in Toronto, Shuster said his inspiration for Superman’s hometown of Metropolis was the Toronto skyline. And his love for comics was inspired by his father, who every night after work would read him the vividly colored newspaper comics. Following his and Siegel’s ill-conceived sale of the Superman rights and his decades of working for and suing DC Comics, Shuster had to retire from the field in the 1970s due to partial blindness, and had to rely on his family’s support for most of the remainder of his life. In an interview, Siegel said Superman was a combination of two people: Harold Lloyd, an actor, and Joe Shuster, his friend.


William Marston (1893-1947). b. Saugus, Massachusetts. Mr. Wonder Woman.Inducted into the Comic Book Hall of Fame in 2006, Marston, a psychologist by training, introduced Wonder Woman—he initially named her “Suprema”—in the 1940’s, at a time when all the great American superheroes and villains were male. Marston, who was influenced by the early suffrage movement, made Wonder Woman strong, independent, and courageous—powerful traits in an era when many saw women as less capable than men. She became a feminist icon, and a superhero who could force villains to tell her the truth with her magic lasso. Through Wonder Woman, Marston introduced his idea of female rehabilitative justice as opposed to male retributive justice. Wonder Woman’s homeland, Paradise Island, held her captives not in a prison, but in Reform Island, a transformation-oriented penal colony.

Meet the Jewish Parents of Superman and Wonder Woman Read More »

Chabad of Poway Shooting Victims Suing Gun Manufacturer and Dealer

A gun control group has filed a lawsuit on behalf of survivors of the Chabad of Poway shooting attack that took place on April 27, 2019. The group is suing the gun manufacturer and the dealer that sold the weapon to suspect, John Timothy Earnest . 

The lawsuit was filed in San Diego court on June 15 by Brady Legal, which does litigation for the gun control nonprofit organization Brady United. It is representing Rabbi Yisroel Goldstein, the former rabbi of Chabad of Poway who lost a finger in the attack, and eight other victims of the shooting, who suffered either physical and/or emotional injuries. Five of the eight victims listed in the suit are minors. The family of Lori Gilbert-Kaye, 60, who was  killed in the attack, is not part of the lawsuit. 

“The victims of the shooting don’t want an incident like this to ever happen again,” Jonathan E. Lowy, vice president, Legal Action Project at Brady and the plaintiffs’ representative, told the Journal in a phone interview. “That’s why we are representing them.”

The plaintiffs are suing Smith & Wesson, which manufactured the M&P15 AR-15-style semi-automatic assault rifle used in the attack, as well as San Diego Guns, where he bought the rifle, for monetary relief. They’re also demanding that the involved parties modify their business practices. 

The lawsuit argues that Smith & Wesson markets guns in a way that attracts or embolden killers, and that the AR-15 could be converted into an illegal assault weapon.

“Unfortunately, for some companies, it takes internalizing the harm that they caused to others to get them to act responsibly in their business practices. We and the plaintiffs hope to make all Americans safer.” — Jonathan E. Lowy

“There are certain design features of an assault weapon that are particularly useful for the mass killing of human beings,” Lowy said. “These are features that are either not useful or legitimate for self-defense or hunting, and may even be counterproductive to those purposes. California law spells out what those features are, and this is a gun that we allege could and was easily modified to be that sort of gun.”

The filing states in part, “This lawsuit does not seek to hold firearms manufacturers and/or sellers liable for responsibly making, marketing, or selling weapons for use by law-abiding citizens while complying with all relevant standards of care and applicable laws designed to prevent unlawful acts of violence. Instead, this lawsuit seeks to impose liability for irresponsible and unlawful conduct by a firearms manufacturer and seller for making, marketing, or selling weapons in an unsafe and illegal manner.” 

The lawsuit also alleges that San Diego Guns violated California law because the suspect used a California hunting license that was not yet in effect when he purchased the gun. 

Lowy said the lawsuit is in its initial stage. The complaint has been filed, and the defendants will be served and need to provide an answer. He estimates that at the very least, the case will take more than a year to complete.   

Brady has been bringing these cases for more than 30 years. James and Sarah Brady started their nonprofit after James — who was White House press secretary for President Ronald Reagan — was shot during the assassination attempt on the then president on March 30, 1981. Brady died 33 years later and his death was a ruled a homicide as a result of that the shooting. 

According to Brady’s website, Americans kill one another with guns at 25 times the rate of other high-income countries, and 155% more people are shot in incidents where high-capacity magazines or assault weapons are used. A Smith & Wesson M&P15 Sport II AR-15-style semi-automatic rifle was used in the Parkland, Fla., high school shooting on Feb 14, 2018, and the victims’ families also filed a federal complaint against the gun manufacturer.  

With their lawsuit, Lowy said the plaintiffs want to prevent a tragedy like theirs from happening again, whether it’s in a synagogue, church, movie theater or classroom. “That can be done if the manufacturing dealers change the way they do business and agree to specific reforms in how they market and sell their guns in a responsible way,” he said. “It can also happen if they are held accountable and have to pay for the harm that they caused. Unfortunately, for some companies, it takes internalizing the harm that they caused to others to get them to act responsibly in their business practices. We and the plaintiffs hope to make all Americans safer.”

Chabad of Poway Shooting Victims Suing Gun Manufacturer and Dealer Read More »

‘Hitler Did Nothing Wrong’ Graffiti Found on Oregon Bus Stop

Graffiti stating that ‘Hitler did nothing wrong’ was found on a bus stop shelter in Oregon on June 14.

The World Link reported that the words, in black spray-paint, were surrounded with multiple swastikas. The bus stop is in Coos Bay, a city northwestern Oregon.

Coos County Area Transit General Manager David Hope told the Link that a city employee had informed him about the graffiti on June 14 and that officials believe it was painted sometime during the afternoon of June 14. He added that he had seen similar graffiti in Florida, where he lived for 35 years.

“This happens frequently to bus stops and shelters and everything,” Hope said. “It can be graffiti, broken windows, all sorts of things that can happen to bus stop signs and shelters. So, not uncommon nationwide.”

Coos Bay Deputy Chief of Police Chris Chapanar told the Link that he hasn’t seen such graffiti in Coos Bay before.

“I can’t even remember the last time we had anything like this,” he said. “So it’s random. Definitely not a pattern. Not right now anyway.”

Anti-Defamation League Pacific Northwest Regional Director Miri Cypers said in a statement to the Journal, “We’re disturbed to learn of the recent anti-Semitic vandalism that took place at a Coos Bay, Oregon bus shelter. We thank a community member for reporting this hateful incident to the transit authority and urge law enforcement to fully investigate this incident.

She added: “Hate and anti-Semitism have no place in Oregon or in any of our communities.”

The Stop Anti-Semitism.org watchdog director Liora Rez similarly said in a statement to the Journal, “We’re extremely disappointed but sadly not surprised. These daily anti-Semitic occurrences are a massive wakeup call to the Jewish community that it’s time to put our differences aside and unite in the fight against anti-Semitism, regardless of which direction it comes from.”

Some past examples of anti-Semitic graffiti in Oregon include graffiti of a swastika at Cleveland High School in southeast Portland in 2018; the same year, a swastika and what appeared to be the words “#JEWDIE” were depicted at Lewis Elementary School in the same area. Additionally in 2018, the words “Free Palestine you f—s” were scrawled on a University of Oregon Hillel sign.

‘Hitler Did Nothing Wrong’ Graffiti Found on Oregon Bus Stop Read More »

Sing Along with Yiddish ‘Fiddler on the Roof’ Virtually

“Fiddler Afn Dakh,” the Yiddish version of the beloved musical “Fiddler on the Roof,” enchanted New York audiences from its summer 2018 debut at the Museum of Jewish Heritage through its smash 18-month Off-Broadway run that ended in January. On June 23, the UJA-Federation of New York will revisit the production in an evening with the cast, featuring a moderated discussion and performances of musical numbers including “If I Were a Rich Man” and “Now I Have Everything.” 

Cast members Joanne Borts, Lisa Fishman, Kirk Geritano, Abby Goldfarb, Samantha Hahn, Stephanie Lynn Mason, Rosie Jo Neddy, Raquell Nobile, Bruce Sabath, Kayleen Seidl, Drew Seigla, James Monroe Števko, and Bobby Underwood will participate in the free Zoom event, which begins at 4 p.m. PDT. Click here to attend.

Sing Along with Yiddish ‘Fiddler on the Roof’ Virtually Read More »

Reasons to Stay at Home – a poem for Torah Portion Sh’lach

There we saw the giants…In our eyes, we seemed
like grasshoppers, and so we were in their eyes.

When opening the front door feels the same
as going to war

When getting groceries is a risky proposition
where nothing is guaranteed

When the masks that keep the virus out
now come in paisley on Etsy

When people are taking the windows
out of the stores

When, in certain localities, they say it’s all a lie
while the death number goes up

While email after email comes telling us
we’re open now

accompanied by pictures of servers dressed
in head to toe plastic

When you’re afraid to let the arms of a stranger
wrap around your torso

When people are hanging from trees for
suspect reasons

When no-one can agree on
whose lives matter

When the virus and the hate commingle
like sisters

When people are convinced this is
the apocalypse

You can understand why a homeless
chosen people

would want to go back to Egypt where
life was hard but predictable

Where we knew the giants
by name

Where the choice between slavery and life
was always life.


God Wrestler: a poem for every Torah Portion by Rick LupertLos Angeles poet Rick Lupert created the Poetry Super Highway (an online publication and resource for poets), and hosted the Cobalt Cafe weekly poetry reading for almost 21 years. He’s authored 23 collections of poetry, including “God Wrestler: A Poem for Every Torah Portion“, “I’m a Jew, Are You” (Jewish themed poems) and “Feeding Holy Cats” (Poetry written while a staff member on the first Birthright Israel trip), and most recently “Hunka Hunka Howdee!” (Poems written in Memphis, Nashville, and Louisville – Ain’t Got No Press, May 2019) and edited the anthologies “Ekphrastia Gone Wild”, “A Poet’s Haggadah”, and “The Night Goes on All Night.” He writes the daily web comic “Cat and Banana” with fellow Los Angeles poet Brendan Constantine. He’s widely published and reads his poetry wherever they let him.

Reasons to Stay at Home – a poem for Torah Portion Sh’lach Read More »

Why A Pro-Israel Congress Is In Danger

Is Eliot Engel the pro-Israel canary in the Democratic congressional coal mine?

Engel has represented parts of the Bronx and Westchester County in the House of Representatives for more than 30 years, where he has compiled a consistently liberal domestic-policy record. He is a supporter of single-payer health care, the Green New Deal, comprehensive immigration reform, marriage equality and gun control. However, he currently is facing a primary challenger from the left: former middle school teacher and principal Jamaal Bowman, who has secured endorsements from, among others, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), and most recently and notably, The New York Times editorial page.

Engel no longer is as natural a fit for a district that has changed dramatically since his first election. He is an older white man representing communities that have become heavily African American and Latino. Bowman has criticized Engel for his support of the 1994 crime bill and for opposing the Iran nuclear deal in 2015. And Engel is one of Congress’ most ardent backers of Israel in a Democratic Party where such a position is becoming increasingly controversial.

Engel has created some of his own problems in this race, including his decision to remain in Washington, D.C., rather than returning to his district for much of the COVID-19 shutdown. Earlier this month, he committed an embarrassing gaffe when he was caught on a live microphone arguing that he should be allowed to speak at a news conference regarding the death of George Floyd.

“If I didn’t have a primary, I wouldn’t care,” said Engel, and although he has since tried to explain that his remark was regarding his role in the event as opposed to his underlying feelings about Floyd’s death and the broader topics of race relations and social justice, the ill-timed comment has served to reinforce the sense that he was no longer in touch with his constituents on such critical issues.

Eliot Engel’s defeat would cost the Jewish state a vocal and influential defender on Capitol Hill.

But this campaign isn’t simply about demographic and generational change. Bowman supports making U.S. aid to Israel conditional on changes in Israeli government policy regarding treatment of Palestinians, and while it’s difficult to predict whether Bowman would join the ranks of anti-Israel voices in Congress, Engel’s defeat would cost the Jewish state a vocal and influential defender on Capitol Hill.

In the not-too-distant past, the lack of differences between the two candidates on most domestic policy matters and Engel’s consistent support for Israel would make his path to reelection an easy one. But just as the nativist voices in the Republican Party represent a pronounced threat to Jewish Americans, the growing anti-Zionist faction within the Democratic Party represents a similar danger. And although the rising influence of both parties’ extremists should be of grave concern, Engel’s defeat in next week’s primary would mark a considerable acceleration of the worrisome shift within the political party most American Jews call home away from its historic support of Israel.

Engel still is capable of holding his seat, even in the face of these demographic and ideological trends. The day after Ocasio-Cortez endorsed Bowman, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) supported Ocasio-Cortez and Engel in their reelection campaigns, attempting to bridge the gap between the two wings of her party. Other senior Democratic House leaders also are closing ranks behind him: Reps. James Clyburn (D-S.C.), Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) and Adam Schiff (D-Burbank) have endorsed Engel as the primary draws closer.

But for a glimpse into the not-too-distant future, it’s worth noting the manner in which Senate Democratic leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) has navigated the primary’s political cross-currents. On June 9, only two weeks before the election, Schumer told reporters that he was “busy with Senate races” and had not endorsed. He was asked if he planned to endorse at some point and declined to answer. Days of news coverage followed, indicating that Schumer would not take sides in the race but neither the senator nor his staff moved to correct that misimpression for more than a week. It was only five days before the primary, as the Democratic establishment was lining up behind Engel, that Schumer joined Gov. Andrew Cuomo, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Hillary Clinton in endorsing.

What was Schumer’s hesitancy? Although Schumer and Engel have worked side by side in Congress to protect Israel’s safety and security for decades, there are whispers in New York political circles that Ocasio-Cortez could mount a primary challenge against Schumer two years from now. Schumer is one of the savviest politicians in America; it appears that he recognizes he’ll have enough Israel-related baggage of his own in 2022 and the last thing he needed was to be forced to carry Engel’s as well.

Schumer is a friend of Engel and a friend of Israel. But he knows which way the political winds are blowing and it’s instructive that he did his best to keep his head down until he had no other option.


Dan Schnur teaches political communications at UC Berkeley, USC and Pepperdine. He hosts the weekly webinar “Politics in the Time of Coronavirus” for the L.A. World Affairs Council Town Hall. Also here.

Why A Pro-Israel Congress Is In Danger Read More »

Will Jewish Schools Teach the Truth About America?

This column was prompted by a report from the Jewish news agency JTA:

“‘We demand concrete change to the Frisch curriculum and culture,’ wrote graduates of the Frisch School in Paramus, New Jersey, the Orthodox high school that counts Jared Kushner among its alums. Their letter connected their call to action to the lessons they learned from the Holocaust and the words ‘never again ….’

“‘Frisch must lead by example and educate the Jewish community about the ongoing human rights failures in the United States,’ they wrote. ‘The fact that graduates of day schools are pushing their schools to incorporate anti-racism education into their curriculum should be seen as a testament to the schools,’ said Paul Bernstein, CEO of Prizmah, a network of Jewish day schools.”

It is not “a testament to the schools.” Here is why:

When I went to yeshiva day schools, America was celebrated. America was regarded —  as described by Menachem Schneerson, the Lubavitcher Rebbe, the most influential rabbi of the 20th century — as a medina shel chesed, “a country of kindness.” 

He knew, as all American Jews knew, that there were many anti-Semites in America, that America should have done more for the Jews of Europe, that universities like Harvard limited the number of Jewish students, that prestigious law firms and country clubs barred Jews, etc. So, then, why did he describe America as a country of kindness? Why did my yeshiva in Brooklyn put on plays honoring George Washington? Why did my Orthodox Jewish day school utilize texts not only celebrating America but which affirmed America as a “melting pot?” Why did a Jew, Irving Berlin, write “God Bless America?”

When you ask the only morally significant question — who abolished slavery? — the answer is America and some other Western countries. And then you should teach the reason: because of Western values rooted in the Bible.

The primary reason was that these Jews knew what the rest of the world was like. They had the wisdom to compare America to other countries, not, as the left does, to Utopia. Compared with the rest of the world, America was — and remains — a medina shel chesed. 

Was it such a country for all citizens? Of course not. At the time when Schneerson described America as a “country of kindness,” the southern half of America enforced immoral and degrading Jim Crow laws, and racism was common in the north as well. And gays were often ostracized and degraded.

But the Torah teaches us that we are not to compare the past with the present. That is why Noah is described in Genesis as righteous “in his generations.” If Noah were to be compared with people in later generations, he would be found wanting. Abraham had a concubine and lied about his wife to save his own life. But only fools — like all those who want to tear down monuments to Washington and Jefferson — would dismiss Abraham’s greatness. Jacob, the man God renamed “Israel,” owned slaves. Should Jews cease calling themselves the “Children of Israel”? Should the State of Israel change its name?

That is what Jewish — and all religious schools — should be teaching when discussing Washington or Jefferson owning slaves. If we are to dismiss the greatness of two of the founders of the freest country in human history (not to mention the best non-Jewish country Jews have ever lived in), then we should do likewise to the Jewish patriarchs. Moses had a fellow Israelite executed for publicly violating the Sabbath. Should his sculpture be removed from the Supreme Court? Will Jewish day schools start to dismiss the greatness of all of our ancestors? If they start to do this to Washington and Jefferson, they should be consistent.

While acknowledging the history of racism, including the history of police racism, if your school cares about truth, it should try to teach all the facts.

Or should they do what the Torah does? While never ignoring the flaws of giants, remember why they were giants.

Will Jewish and Christian schools teach that every society in world history, including African societies, Native Americans and the Arab world, all practiced slavery? If not, why not? Isn’t it morally and factually dishonest to teach only about slavery in America?

What should be taught is that America’s and the Western world’s uniqueness did not lie in having slaves. Slavery was universal. Therefore, the morally serious person asks who abolished slavery, not who practiced it. But the left, is not now, nor ever has been, morally serious. 

When you ask the only morally significant question — who abolished slavery? — the answer is America and some other Western countries. And then you should teach the reason: because of Western values rooted in the Bible. One would think that fact would be central to the curriculum of every Jewish and Christian school that takes their religion seriously. But much of contemporary Christianity and Judaism has been more influenced more by the left.

While acknowledging the history of racism, including the history of police racism, if your school cares about truth, it should try to teach all the facts. One such fact is that in August 2019, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, a peer-reviewed journal, concluded there is “no significant evidence of antiblack disparity in the likelihood of being fatally shot by police.” 

A Jewish school might also wish to note that, according to a 2016 Anti-Defamation League survey, “ ‘Anti-Semitic views’ among black respondents were materially more common than among whites.” A Washington Post blog reported two years earlier, “ ‘Entrenched anti-Semitic views’ are far more common among African Americans and Latinos than among others.”

“There are only two races,” Viktor Frankl wrote, “the race of the decent and the race of the indecent.”

Indeed, in 1991, black attacks on Jews in Crown Heights, N.Y., were so violent that then-New York City Mayor Ed Koch, The New York Times’ executive editor, A.M. Rosenthal and others called it a “pogrom.” Brandeis University historian Edward S. Shapiro wrote it was “the most serious anti-Semitic incident in American history.” Will even Jewish schools smear American society as “systemically” racist while making believe blacks are only victims?

One reason this is important is so that your students will understand that “all whites are racist” is as vile a charge as “all black people are anti-Semitic.”

Finally, will Jewish schools teach the central teaching of Judaism — that Adam had no race? As the Sages put it: “Why was only a single specimen of man created first? To teach us that … no race or class may claim a nobler ancestry, saying, ‘Our father was born first.’ ” In other words, the Bible’s demand is that we be colorblind. But in the morally sick world in which we now live, “colorblind” is deemed “racist.” 

Will Jewish day schools teach that colorblind is Jewish or that colorblind is racist?

“There are only two races,” Viktor Frankl wrote, “the race of the decent and the race of the indecent.”

No Jewish parent should send their child to a Jewish school that teaches otherwise.


Copyright 2020 creators.com. Dennis Prager is a nationally syndicated radio talk show host; president of PragerU, which has 1 billion views a year; and author most recently of volume two (Genesis) of the bestselling Torah and Bible commentary in America, “The Rational Bible.” Reprinted with permission.

Will Jewish Schools Teach the Truth About America? Read More »