fbpx

April 10, 2019

benny gantz

Can the IDF Save Israel’s Democracy?

As I write this, it’s still not clear who will lead the Israeli government after the April 9 election. One thing that is clear, however, is that whenever Israelis vote, one question usually looms large: Which choice is more likely to keep us safe?  The bland word “security” doesn’t quite capture this existential human desire to stay alive.

But there is another issue facing Israelis that is also existential: Can their country remain a democracy in an extremely dangerous neighborhood? Specifically, can they separate from the 2.8 million Palestinians in the West Bank in order to secure Israel’s future as a Jewish democracy?

When a value like “Staying a democracy” clashes with a value like “Staying safe,” that is when election choices become heart-wrenching. 

“Even Israelis who support a two-state solution,” Yossi Klein Halevi wrote recently in the Globe and Mail, “seek reassurance that their government will not recklessly endanger the country’s security with naive notions of ‘peace now.’ The Middle East of 2019 is not the arena for fulfilling dreams but of preventing nightmares.”

This nightmare, Halevi writes, is a “radical Palestinian state on the West Bank that would complete the encirclement of Israel by pro-Iranian forces – from Hezbollah on Israel’s northern border to Hamas on its southern border, along with Iranian bases in Syria.”

You can’t underestimate the power of this nightmare when you ask yourself why so many Israelis keep voting for hawkish right-wing coalitions. These Israelis are not peace-haters or even democracy-haters; they are, above all, danger-haters. They are deeply in tune with the existential threats that surround them.

They’re so in tune, in fact, that democracy itself can be seen as part of the danger. As Halevi writes, “Under conditions of intensifying siege, the far right’s warning that democratic norms threaten security resonate.”

Israel’s democracy, in other words, will never be secured until enough Israelis are willing to accept the security risks that this will entail.  

This is why the new, centrist Blue and White party is such a key development. The leader, Benny Gantz, is a former Israel Defense Forces (IDF) chief of staff, and he is supported by two other former army chiefs, Moshe Yaalon and Gabi Ashkenazi. For most of their lives, these army guys have lived and breathed Israeli security. If they ever decide that a risk is worth taking, many Israelis will follow them.

Unlike Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is beholden to his uncompromising right-wing coalition partners, these Blue and White leaders embrace what Halevi calls “the entwined identities at the core of our national being as both a Jewish and a democratic state.” The party, he writes, is “hawkish on security but flexible on territorial compromise with the Palestinians.” 

Win or lose, in just a few months this centrist party has become a major political force in Israel. It is precisely because it is led by hard-nosed security hawks that it is uniquely positioned to make heart-wrenching compromises. At the very least, it would set Israel on the responsible path to remain a Jewish democracy, something Netanyahu, who has moved further to the right in recent years, doesn’t seem very eager to do.

The real drama of Israel is not its ability to survive, or its extraordinary scientific contributions to the world, or its humanitarian outreach, or its vibrant cultural scene. The real drama of Israel is how it has managed to maintain a free and open and democratic society while surrounded by enemies from all sides.

“Israel’s significance as a democratic state has been its ability to serve as a laboratory for what happens to democracy under conditions of extremity,” Halevi writes. “Against all odds, Israel has maintained flourishing democratic institutions like a vigorous supreme court and an irreverent media. The persistence of Israeli democracy has been a kind of miracle.”

He cautions, however, that “miracles cannot be taken for granted and require constant protection.”

“Staying safe” and “staying a democracy” are like two children. You love them both equally. You never want to choose between them. Israel, now more than ever, is facing this epic question: Can it keep both of these children alive?  

Can the IDF Save Israel’s Democracy? Read More »

April 12, 2019

April 12, 2019 Read More »

Israeli Cornell Student Told to ‘Quit Complaining’ by Pro-Palestinian Campus Group

A pro-Palestinian group at Cornell University mocked an Israeli student whose home was struck by a rocket from the Gaza Strip by telling her in a Facebook comment to “quit complaining about how it ruined your brunch plans.”

The student, Shir Kidron, wrote in an April 7 op-ed for the Cornell Daily Sun that in 2009, her Gedera home was struck by a rocket, killing her dog Rosie.

The story of my home in Gedera is not unique,” Kidron wrote. “It resonates with tens of thousands of Israelis who have been under a constant threat of rockets from Gaza over the past 18 years. According to the Israeli Center for the Treatment of Psychotrauma, 40 percent of the children in the Israeli border town of Sderot suffer from PTSD. This is what happens when, at any moment, you could be given only 15 seconds to run for shelter.”

A Facebook page titled “Reject Radicals at Cornell” posted Kidron’s op-ed on April 9 and tagged Cornell Collective for Justice in Palestine (CCJP). CCJP commented on the post by stating, “Palestinians have a moral and legal right to use armed struggle to shake of the yoke of occupation. If you want the rockets to stop, end the occupation. Otherwise quit complaining about how it ruined your brunch plans in Ashdod.”

The Reject Radicals at Cornell page then highlighted CCJP’s aforementioned comment in a subsequent post:

https://www.facebook.com/1073577269507598/photos/a.1081379532060705/1082075258657799/?type=3&theater

CCJP responded by commenting, “I don’t know what kind of astroturf operation you all are running here, but if you tag our group in another post I’m reporting you for harassment.”

CCJP was one of the groups that signed onto Cornell Students for Justice in Palestine’s February 20 letter to Cornell President Martha Pollack calling on the university to divest from companies that conduct business with Israel, accusing Israel of engaging in “apartheid” and “ethnic cleansing.”

Rena Nasar, StandWithUs’ Tri-State campus director and managing director of campus affairs, said in a statement to the Journal, “It is inhumane to minimize the rockets Hamas shoots into Israeli civilian homes and nursery schools. There is no justification for such barbaric terrorism and Israel has a right to defend its citizens.” 

“It is shameful that CCJP would skirt the issue of the need for negotiations, and blame only Israel for the lack of peace,” Nasar said. “This is yet another example of how boycott campaigns on campus descend into outright hate speech. We urge university leaders to take a clear moral stand by condemning this rhetoric.”

The university did not respond to the Journal’s request for comment.

Kidron was arguing against a divestment resolution that could come up for a vote in the Student Assembly on April 11, writing that those in favor of it are promulgating a “one-sided and violent attempt at delegitimizing me and my country.”

Israeli Cornell Student Told to ‘Quit Complaining’ by Pro-Palestinian Campus Group Read More »