fbpx

February 6, 2017

Trump, Bannon and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion

The “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” was an early example of fake news originating in Russia that has inspired anti-Semites and ignited anti-Semitism for over 100 years. Now, that revolting ideology may have found a new home in the White House.

First published in Russia in 1903, the forged document was quickly translated into many languages. The document purports to be an account of a late 19th-century meeting (which of course never took place) where Jewish leaders allegedly discussed their goal of global domination. Their means to world control would be through subverting the morals of non-Jews and by controlling the international press and the world’s economies. Sound familiar?

The influence of this infamous libel was far-reaching. Henry Ford financed the printing of 500,000 copies that were distributed throughout the United States in the 1920s. The Nazis used the Protocols to stir up hatred against the Jews. Despite being conclusively proven to be a forgery as early as 1921, it is still widely available today in many countries and languages as well as on the Internet and continues to be presented by some as genuine.

This early Russian foray into the invention of fake facts is interesting in light of what’s happening today. The spiritual heir of the original forgers is President Putin who during last year’s US presidential election authorized a flood of lies, smears, inventions, distortions and slanders designed to damage the candidacy of Hillary Clinton and help the election of Donald Trump. It’s hard to measure how much influence this had but one fact is clear – Trump and not Clinton is President today.

Trump’s chief White House strategist is Steve Bannon, the former head of the alt-right Breitbart News which has become notorious for its use of anti-Semitic tropes, many harking back to the same themes as those of the Protocols.

For example, during Bannon’s reign over Breitbart, the website ran articles referring to conservative commentator Bill Kristol as a “renegade Jew” and Washington Post columnist Anne Applebaum as “a Polish, Jewish, American elitist scorned.” The theme was that Jews have allegiance not to any one nation but only to each other.

After Bannon joined Trump’s presidential campaign, it too started flirting with anti-Semitic tropes, including tweeting an image of a star of David with Hillary Clinton’s face superimposed on a pile of money. His closing ad warned of a shadowy cabal of bankers and international elites, several of whom had Jewish names. These were words that could have been copied verbatim from the Protocols.

Once in the White House, it didn’t take long for Bannon to make his mark. The administration issued a statement on international Holocaust Day that contained no mention of the Jews. Of course, Holocaust denial is a staple of far-right neo-Nazi movements worldwide. It’s hard to make people hate the Jews when they feel sorry for them. Therefore it’s necessary to erase any sympathy people might have for the Jewish victims of the Holocaust.

When Jewish groups objected to being airbrushed from history, the Trump administration doubled down. The White House made it clear that the omission of Jews was no accident. Trump’s people wanted to make the point that other victims also suffered and died in the Holocaust.

Trump appears to have thoroughly absorbed the lessons taught to him by Putin, who himself draws of decades of lies and distortion put forward by the various rulers of the former Soviet Union and Tsarist Empire. Now Trump claims that any polls showing opposition to him are fake. On Feb 6, he tweeted: “Any negative polls are fake news, just like the CNN, ABC, NBC polls in the election. Sorry, people want border security and extreme vetting.” His adviser Kellyanne Conway referred to a “massacre” of Americans in Bowling Green, Kentucky which simply never happened. Yet Conway spoke of the lives of American troops lost as if it were a real event.

If the history of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion teaches us anything, it should be to be very wary and very fearful. Lies can have immense staying power. They can lead to extreme suffering and destruction. They can help pull the entire world into war and place the existence of an entire people under threat. They are especially dangerous when promoted by national leaders like Trump and Putin with almost unlimited access to the media and other means of communication at their disposal. They must be resisted at every turn. We have faith that the truth will eventually out – but it won’t unless we fight to make it so.

The author is Special Adviser to the President of J Street

Trump, Bannon and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion Read More »

Getting involved in California’s crisis of uncertainty

Each May, I head to Sacramento with scores of Jewish community members from across California to meet with legislators on issues that impact our State. Whether it is state budget deficits affecting programs that assist low-income seniors, anti-Semitism on our college campuses, or combatting human trafficking, we stand up for the basic rights and well-being of all Californians.   While every year we face uncertainties, 2017 appears to be a year of unusual challenge in light of the policy changes coming out of Washington. 

This May promises to be different in Sacramento because California is facing a crisis of uncertainty.   Will the Affordable Care Act be dismantled?  What about Medicare and Medi-Cal? How will federal policy changes impact DACA immigrants in California?  How can we protect the most vulnerable Californians who depend on federally funded safety net programs?  These are just a few of troubling unknowns we must grapple with.

California has a Democratic super majority in the State Legislature.  Our leaders, Governor Jerry Brown, Senate President Pro Tempore Kevin DeLeon, Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon, and newly appointed Attorney General Xavier Becerra have all unequivocally made clear that they will fight to protect Californians from attempts to roll back the progress we have made. We, the California Jewish community, must show our support by joining them in the fights that lie ahead.  

For many of us, momentum is building to “do something.”   I, like so many others, want to be engaged in the political process to ensure that the basic human and civil rights of all Californians are protected.  The Jewish Public Affairs Committee of California (JPAC) provides access to that engagement.  JPAC is working closely with the California Legislature and like-minded groups to build support across party lines.  JPAC’s Advocacy Day is the culminating effort of months of research, coalition building and convening to bring concerned citizens from the Jewish community to Sacramento to meet with key legislators on issues that impact our State. I will be there this May, and I hope that many others will join me in working together to make the voice of the Jewish community heard where it counts- standing up for human rights and equality in our State.

 Julie K. Zeisler is an independent non-profit consultant based in Los Angeles and the Association Director of the Jewish Public Affairs Committee of California.

Getting involved in California’s crisis of uncertainty Read More »

Knesset passes historic bill to legalize settlements on Palestinian land

The Israeli parliament passed a bill that would retroactively legalize some West Bank settlements built on private Palestinian land.

Knesset lawmakers voted 60-52 in favor of the measure late Monday to legalize some 4,000 settler homes.

The law, which prevents the government from demolishing the homes, comes less than a week after police forcibly evacuated the Amona outpost. It represents the first time the government has tried to implement Israeli law in Area C, part of the West Bank that is under Israeli civilian and military rule, according to The Jerusalem Post.

Knesset member Shuli Muallem-Refaeli of the pro-settler Jewish Home party said Monday that the bill was “dedicated to the brave people of Amona who were forced to go through what no Jewish family will have to again,” The Times of Israel reported.

The bill has drawn sharp condemnation. Leaders of the Zionist Union and Yesh Atid, the second and fourth largest parties in the Knesset, respectively, both warned against its passage.

Israel’s attorney general, Avichai Mandelblit, has said the bill violates local and international law and would likely be overturned by the Supreme Court.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was not present for the vote, as his scheduled return from a trip to the United Kingdom was delayed.

Following a Monday meeting with British Prime Minister Theresa May, Netanyahu denied he had sought to delay the vote after Feb. 15, when he is set to meet with President Donald Trump in Washington, D.C., Haaretz reported.

“I never said that I want to delay the vote on this law,” Netanyahu said. “I said that I will act according to our national interest. That requires that we do not surprise our friends and keep them updated – and the American administration has been updated. This process was important for me because we are trying to act this way, especially with very close friends.”

On Thursday, Trump in his first statement on Israeli settlements since taking office said construction of new settlements “may not be helpful” in reaching a peace agreement, though he denied that existing settlements are impediments to a deal.

The Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee, which have traditionally been hesitant to weigh in on Israeli domestic issues, both criticized the measure on Monday.

ADL leaders said it would harm Israel’s image abroad and lead to legal repercussions.

“[I]t is imperative that the Knesset recognizes that passing this law will be harmful to Israel’s image internationally and could undermine future efforts to achieving a two-state solution,” said Jonathan Greenblatt, the ADL’s national director.

The director of ADL’s Israel office, Carole Nuriel, added that the measure “may also trigger severe international legal repercussions.”

AJC said it was “deeply disappointed” about the bill’s passage and called on the Supreme Court to “reverse this misguided legislation.”

“The controversial Knesset action, ahead of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s meeting with President Trump in Washington, is misguided and likely to prove counter-productive to Israel’s core national interests,” said AJC CEO David Harris.

B’Tselem, a watchdog monitoring human rights abuses in the settlements, slammed the bill.

“The law passed by the Knesset today proves yet again that Israel has no intention of ending its control over the Palestinians or its theft of their land,” the group said in a statement. “Lending a semblance of legality to this ongoing act of plunder is a disgrace for the state and its legislature.”

Peace Now, a left-leaning group promoting the two-state solution, also criticized passage.

“By passing this law, Netanyahu makes theft an official Israeli policy and stains the Israeli law books,” the group said in a statement. “By giving a green light to settlers to build illegally on private Palestinian land, the legalization law is another step towards annexation and away from a two state solution.”

Knesset passes historic bill to legalize settlements on Palestinian land Read More »

Marine Le Pen: French Jews should sacrifice yarmulke in struggle against radical Islam

French far-right leader Marine Le Pen said French Jews should give up the wearing of yarmulkes as part of the country’s struggle to defeat radical Islam.

In an interview with Israel’s Channel 2 that aired Friday, Le Pen expressed support for banning the wearing of yarmulkes as part of her broader effort to outlaw religious symbols in public, Britain’s Jewish Chronicle reported Sunday.

“Honestly, the dangerous situation in which Jews in France live is such that those who walk with a kippah are in any case a minority because they are afraid,” Le Pen said, using the Hebrew word for yarmulke. “But I mainly think the struggle against radical Islam should be a joint struggle and everyone should say, ‘There, we are sacrificing something.’”

Referring to French Jews, Le Pen added: “Maybe they will do with just wearing a hat, but it would be a step in the effort to stamp out radical Islam in France.”

Le Pen is a leading contender in the upcoming French presidential contest, with a recent poll showing her advancing to the second round of balloting in May but still losing handily to front-runner Emmanuel Marcon. Her political party, the National Front, was founded by her father, Jean-Marie Le Pen, who routinely minimized the Holocaust.

The younger Le Pen has sought to move the party past her father’s controversies, but French Jewish leaders still consider the National Front anti-Semitic.

Marine Le Pen: French Jews should sacrifice yarmulke in struggle against radical Islam Read More »

Thom-Yorke

Radiohead will play in Israel in July

The acclaimed British rock band Radiohead will take the stage in Israel this summer.

The Grammy-winning group, which has sold over 30 million albums around the world, will play at Tel Aviv’s Hayarkon Park in July, Haaretz reported Sunday. The specific show dates and ticket prices have not yet been released.

As Haaretz noted, the band became popular in the Jewish state after a version of its song “Creep” was featured in a 1993 commercial for the Israeli fashion brand Castro. The group performed in Israel that year, then again in 1995 as the opening act for R.E.M.

Since then, the band has gone on to become one of the most successful rock outfits in the world. Its ninth and latest album, “A Moon Shaped Pool,” was released in 2016.

In 2015, Radiohead guitarist Jonny Greenwood collaborated with Israeli composer Shye Ben-Tzur on a record called “Junun.” The making of the album, which was recorded in the Rasjathan region of India with a group of Indian musicians, was the subject of a documentary filmed by the famed director Paul Thomas Anderson.

Radiohead will play in Israel in July Read More »

3 must-watch Jewish moments from this week’s ‘Saturday Night Live’

From a mention of Ivanka and Jared’s Shabbat observance to poking fun of Sean Spicer’s defense of a Holocaust statement that did not mention Jews, this weekend’s “Saturday Night Live” had no shortage of Jewish content. Here’s the low-down on the sketches you may have missed.

Trump says that when Ivanka and Jared are observing Shabbat ‘the goys will play’

The sketch-comedy show opened with President Donald Trump (played by Alec Baldwin) sitting at his desk in the Oval Office. Trump asks an aide whether Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner, his Orthodox Jewish daughter and son-in-law are there, saying they “always keep me so calm and make sure I don’t do anything too crazy.” When the aide says the couple are off observing Shabbat, Trump says: “Perfect, when the Jews are away the goys will play.”

Then Trump’s chief policy adviser Stephen Bannon enters — dressed as the Grim Reaper — prodding him to make calls to world leaders, with disastrous consequences.

The reference to Ivanka and Jared’s Shabbat observance didn’t come out of nowhere. A Vanity Fair article suggested that the couple may have been unaware of protests against Trump’s controversial refugee ban since the fallout began over Shabbat.

Trump tells Angela Merkel he will write a memoir called “My Struggle”

After Trump tells both the Australian prime minister and Mexican president to “prepare to go to war,” Bannon-cum-Grim Reaper suggests Trump call Germany. German Chancellor Angela Merkel (played by Kate McKinnon) picks up, not doing much to hide her disappointment that former president Barack Obama isn’t the one calling.

Trump starts talking about Holocaust Remembrance Day, but quickly makes it about himself.

“I want to be serious for just a moment, last week it was Holocaust Remembrance Day and as you know 6 million people,” he says, pausing, “were at my inauguration.” He then tells a speechless Merkel that he will write a memoir about unfair media coverage of his inauguration, titled “My Struggle” and asks her how to say the title in German.

Sean Spicer says a controversial White House Holocaust statement was written by someone who is “super Jewy” 

In a different sketch, Melissa McCarthy plays an overly aggressive White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer (and manages to look astoundingly like him) who keeps on accusing the press corps of lying. When one reporter asks about whether a White House Holocaust statement that omitted any reference to Jewish suffering was anti-Semitic, Spicer starts squirting him with a water gun.

“This is soapy water, and I’m washing that filthy lying mouth,” Spicer says when the reporter reacts with shock.

“First of all, how could the statement be anti-Semitic? The guy who wrote it was super Jewy, okay?” asks McCarthy’s Spicer. (The real-life Spicer, in defending the statement, said it had been written “with the help of an individual who is both Jewish and the descendants of Holocaust survivors,” later reported to be White House staffer Boris Epshteyn.)

3 must-watch Jewish moments from this week’s ‘Saturday Night Live’ Read More »

No, Orthodox Jews cannot ‘Just send their kids to public school’

Liberals are saying Trump Education nominee Betsy DeVos “wants to take money away from public schools” by helping parents use taxpayer dollars for religious and other schools. But under the current system, the government unfairly forces many parents to choose between an expensive religious education and a free education that stymies their religious observance. Since practicing one’s religion without government interference is a constitutional guarantee, America’s public school regime is unconstitutional, and should be upended by the coming more-conservative Supreme Court.

This is not a column about vouchers or the other proposed plans for making America’s school system fairer. Instead, it’s about Orthodox Jews, one of the starkest examples of an American group that simply cannot send their children to public school while maintaining the free exercise of their religion. 

Emphasis on the “free.” Jewish day school education is expensive, averaging $15,000 a year – which means an Orthodox Jewish family with three children pays more than half a million dollars from kindergarten through 12th grade, in addition to paying school taxes like everyone else. Liberals are always complaining that Christians are trying to “impose their values,” but what’s a bigger imposition than a half-million dollar fine (of sorts) simply for practicing your religion?

 Well, one might respond, Orthodox Jews choose to keep their children out of public schools. Well, if you believe Orthodox Jews could send their children to public school K-12 and expect them all to remain fully Orthodox, you don’t know Orthodox Jews. One illustration is Orthodox parents whose circumstances make public school necessary, but find their children’s religious values in jeopardy. Some examples (names have been changed);

The Feldbaums have five children, the youngest with learning disabilities. Because local Jewish schools were unequipped to help little Menachem Mendel’s special needs, his parents sent him to the local elementary school for second and third grade, where he received excellent special education.

 But religiously, it was a disaster. Menachem Mendel never got in the habit of saying brachos (blessings) over food at school, and soon stopped saying them at home, too. His mother told me he would sneak to the classroom bookshelf to read books not allowed in his home because they are contrary to Jewish values. Orthodox Jewish parents don’t just teach texts and beliefs. Orthodox parenting involves transmitting “Yiddishkeit,” the Jewish way of life. Public school made that hard with Menachem Mendel. “He lost part of his Yiddishkeit,” Mrs. Feldbaum told me. “And he will never get that back.”

 Joshua had a similar experience at the public high school his parents reluctantly enrolled him in because they saw no real Jewish choices in their city. Joshua has no regrets about his public school experience, where he made lifelong Jewish and non-Jewish friends and felt accepted and welcome – but at the price of compromising his Jewish observance. “I broke Shabbos (violated the Sabbath) a lot, to be honest,” he said. “And when my friends went out they were always eating treyf (non-kosher food) and eventually I started to as well. I would eat everything. And because it wasn’t part of the school schedule, I did not pray much.”

Joshua’s Jewish life was crippled, and he’s totally OK with that. But his parents aren’t, and neither should you. If Joshua’s family lived in a city where they could have chosen a Jewish school, it would be both wrong and false to tell his parents they can always choose to educate their Orthodox children at the local public school for free.

Rabbi Miller also lives in Joshua’s city, and sent his children to a non-Jewish school as well. He said Orthodox kids in that situation have to deal with problematic curricular subjects and bullying over their clothing and practices, but the worst part involves the social components of the high school experience. For example, mixed dancing is forbidden to Orthodox Jews, for whom dating is generally focused on finding a spouse. Yet Orthodox students in non-Jewish schools can find proms alluring, despite the values they learn at home. Similarly, most high school sports teams play on Friday nights and Saturdays, which can put Jewish students in conflict with their faith – and ultimately with their parents.

Is it really right that some Americans must scrape and pay a huge portion of their income just to maintain their religion? Too many large Jewish families move to Israel with its free Jewish schools as the only solution to family tuition bills that can top $100,000 a year. Think about that: Americans going overseas just to practice their religion. Goodbye, Plymouth Rock.

Nor are Jewish schools too expensive for government subsidy. New York state pays about $5,000 more per public school student than the average day school tuition. And the government wouldn’t need to pay for an outstanding education for religious students, just an appropriate one. A parallel: under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), public schools are required to provide an appropriate education for children regardless of learning or physical disabilities. But when the school cannot do so, the district is required to pay for an appropriate education at a private school. Public schools can rarely provide Orthodox Jews with an appropriate education.

“But the Separation of Church and State!” you might respond. Well, the Separation of Church and State means what the Supreme Court says it means, and within a few years the court will probably be much more sympathetic to religious freedom claims of all sorts. I’m suggesting they strike down the current secular public school regime as an unconstitutional restriction of the free exercise of religion.

But I’m not advocating a specific solution. If vouchers and educational savings accounts don’t pass muster with the public, maybe liberals and conservatives can work together to create something new that will meet the needs of current public school students as well as Orthodox Jews – and Mormons and Evangelicals and Catholics and Muslims and others who cannot properly exercise their faith with children in public schools.

If your response to learning that public schools block Orthodox Jews from staying Orthodox is “Tough – then they’ll have to pay for their own schools,” you’re proving my point. Anyone aware of the way public schools threaten Orthodox life but show no sympathy for the plight of people like the Feldbaums and the Millers are essentially approving of government pressure on Americans to let go of essential parts of their faith.

That’s unconstitutional. And the Supreme Court should declare it so.


David Benkof is a columnist for the Daily Caller, where this essay first appeared. Follow him on Twitter (@DavidBenkof) or E-mail him at DavidBenkof@gmail.com.

No, Orthodox Jews cannot ‘Just send their kids to public school’ Read More »

Miriam Bell, championed LAMOTH, dies at 86

Miriam Bell, a Holocaust survivor who played a role in establishing the Los Angeles Museum of the Holocaust (LAMOTH) in Pan Pacific Park, the nation’s oldest survivor-founded museum, died Jan. 6 of cancer. She was 86.

“She gave so much of her life to making sure that this building would be here and this museum would be able to teach people about the Holocaust,” LAMOTH Special Projects Coordinator Michael Morgenstern, who was among those who spoke at Bell’s Jan. 10 funeral at Mount Sinai Hollywood Hills, told the Journal.

She is survived by her husband of 66 years, Sam; daughters Frances Zelig and Helen Radin, and four grandchildren.

Born Oct. 10, 1930, in Kovno (Kaunas), Lithuania, Bell was the fourth-oldest of seven siblings in a middle-class home. Her childhood ended on June 22, 1941, when Nazi soldiers attacked her native city and murdered her father, Chaim. Over the next three years, Bell would endure the Stutthof concentration camp in Poland; a slave labor camp near Hamburg, where she worked 12-hour shifts in a munitions factory; and Bergen-Belsen.

Her devotion to her family showed even during the darkest of times. For example, while imprisoned in a labor camp, she demanded that the Nazis send her brother, Simon, to a hospital so that he would not contract typhus like many of the other prisoners had.

When British troops liberated Bergen-Belsen on April 15, 1945, Bell was 14 years old, weighed 50 pounds and had lost several family members, including three siblings and both of her parents. After the war, she spent time in Ukraine, Berlin and Munich, before settling in Toronto, where she met her husband, Sam, and worked in a hospital. The couple had two daughters; Frances was born in 1953, and Helen in 1957.

Upon moving to Los Angeles in 1964, Bell immediately became involved with other survivors.Helen recalled her mother hosting events in their home with other survivors, particularly those who were also Lithuanian.

“My mother used to have meetings in our house, I remember all the time. … These were survivors who found each other. … Those were all the people who came to our weddings, baby showers and bridal showers,” she said in a phone interview from New York. “These were my mother’s core friends.”

Bell was active in helping to transition LAMOTH, a survivor-founded museum, from a rented space at the headquarters of The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles — it was then known as the Martyr’s Museum — to its current home in Pan Pacific Park, where it opened in 2010.

“She would go to all the City Hall meetings … [and] every discussion we had about putting this museum in Pan Pacific Park,” Morgenstern said. “She specifically said that it was very important to her that the world would never forget what happened.”

She served on the museum’s executive board. Additionally, she was a teacher there, sharing her story with students visiting the museum.

“She was soft-spoken, but very determined. Just because her voice might have been soft by the time I knew her, she still had a tremendous passion and a tremendous strength about her,” Morgenstern said. “She was just such a strong-willed woman.”

LAMOTH is accepting donations in Bell’s memory. For information, contact Victoria Lonberg at LAMOTH at (323) 456-5078.

Miriam Bell, championed LAMOTH, dies at 86 Read More »

Keeping the peace in troubled times

Angry disagreement now dominates our national discourse, with emphasis on the “angry.”

We feel, with William Butler Yeats, that “Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold; mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.”

I believe that however we define America, whatever principles we think it stands for, it’s worth preserving. So are our families and friendships.

Whether you think that America “was never great” or you yearn for a lost era of innocence and patriotism, no one can deny America’s achievements. No one can deny the ideals that our country has imperfectly tried to follow. People vote with their feet. Middle Eastern migrants don’t want to go to Saudi Arabia, which is much closer but won’t take them, anyway. They want to come here.

The good we have achieved, and the good we can still achieve, are things that we don’t want to throw away. America can survive a controversial president. It can’t survive being torn apart.

This is a difficult time for all of us. But we can get through it if we keep our heads and follow some common-sense rules – both personally, and as a country.

Keeping Our Personal Sanity

The personal rules are easier to follow.

First, don’t sever relationships that matter. Our relationships with family and close friends should transcend most disagreements. That also applies to other people we respect, who might have some ideas we find repugnant. If we know they’re good people whom we admire for other reasons, then we shouldn’t close the door on them permanently.

Online or in real life, I never “unfriend” family, close friends, or people I respect. Every family has its Uncle Frank who’s a staunch right-winger and Aunt Sally who’s a staunch left-winger. When they walk through the front door, we should greet them warmly, embrace them, and avoid conversation about their hot-button subjects. We can talk about the kids or the weather. Online, we can mute their posts so we remain friends but don’t have to see their political rants.

Second, forgive hurtful things that people said in heated arguments. If you’re ever in doubt, forgive them anyway. Forgiveness should be our default response. The only people exempt from this rule are those who have never said anything stupid or hurtful. Which means: nobody.

Third, remember that we all sometimes have crazy ideas. Remember that people, including us, tend to base their political beliefs more on emotion than on facts or reasoning. As a result, good people, smart people can believe things that we think are absurd. Don’t abandon them because of it.

Fourth, remember that we all sometimes change our minds. People who bitterly disagree with you today might decide tomorrow that you’re right. Or you might decide that they’re right. The fact that we feel absolutely sure of our own rightness doesn’t guarantee that we’re right, only that we’re sure.

Keeping Our Political Sanity

It might surprise you to learn that we’re not the first generation to have this kind of disagreement. In the late 1700s, the United States – referred to in the plural until the mid-20th century – were sharply divided on issues such as religion, local autonomy, and of course – to our shame – slavery.

Does this situation sound familiar?

“A zeal for different opinions concerning religion, concerning government, and many other points; an attachment to different leaders ambitiously contending for pre-eminence and power … have, in turn, divided mankind into parties, inflamed them with mutual animosity, and rendered them much more disposed to vex and oppress each other than to co-operate for their common good.”

That’s from Federalist Paper #10 by James Madison, published in 1788. The bitter national dissension we see today is an old problem that was solved (as well as it can be) a long time ago. We just forgot the solution.

The American Founders needed to unite the colonies into a single nation in spite of their disagreements. They did it with the last article in the U.S. Constitution’s Bill of Rights:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” (10th Amendment)

In Federalist Paper #45, Madison explained the meaning:

“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce …The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.”

We’ve heard a lot about the disagreements between California and other parts of the country, most notably with the Trump White House. It’s what’s got some people promoting “Calexit.”

But what if the federal government had no power to tell the State of California how to run its internal affairs, except for basic human rights and issues affecting the entire country? Then it wouldn’t matter what the president wanted to do. He or she wouldn’t be able to do it. Calexit would be superfluous.

Going back to the Constitution isn’t without cost. Apart from the legal hurdles, it requires a willingness to “live and let live.” Arbitrary power seems like a great idea when you’re the one who’s got it. But when it’s in the hands of people with whom you disagree, it’s suddenly a lot less appealing. If we don’t want people in Kentucky dictating how people live in California, then we must give up the idea that people in California may dictate to people in Kentucky how they are required to live.

The U.S. Constitution can solve our political problems, if we’ll let it.

Keeping the peace in troubled times Read More »

UC Riverside student government votes to remove Sabra hummus from dining service

The student government at the University of California, Riverside, unanimously voted to approve a resolution calling for the removal of Sabra brand hummus from campus dining services.

The resolution passed last week in a 13-0 vote with one abstention. The resolution is not enforceable, and the UC Riverside administration says it has no plans to remove the hummus.

The removal was requested because the Sabra company’s joint owner is the Israel-based Strauss Group, which allegedly supports the Israeli military. The campus organization Students for Justice in Palestine backed the resolution.

“Sabra Dipping Company is owned by two independent global food companies — PepsiCo, based in the U.S., and Strauss Group, which is headquartered in Israel,” Sabra spokeswoman Ilya Welfeld said in a statement issued to the local NBC affiliate.

“Each company is a separate entity and independent company,” she said, adding that Sabra has “no political positions or affiliations.”

In 2015, the campus dining service removed Sabra hummus after being approached by the Students for Justice in Palestine chapter on campus. Tapaz2Go hummus, from Mediterranean Snacks, briefly replaced Sabra, but Sabra hummus was restored after the university realized that a political position was an underlying political position for its removal.

In March 2014, the school’s student government passed a resolution urging administrators to divest from Israel, but rescinded it the following month.

DePaul University briefly stopped offering Sabra hummus in 2011 before reinstating it, and a year earlier, students at Princeton University voted on the issue. In neither case was Sabra hummus permanently removed from the campus dining facilities.

UC Riverside student government votes to remove Sabra hummus from dining service Read More »