fbpx

December 16, 2016

Aleppo, Trump, Russia and Us

Aleppo has become a hellpit of suffering. After several agonizing false starts, evacuation may have truly begun, and what now? What, if anything, are we Americans to do?And what have we done?
The situation has been grinding on since the Arab Spring, when all over the Middle East people began to rise up and demand democratic change. Bashar al-Assad, rather than exit with grace, or at least transform his regime, chose to hang on to power by whatever ruthless means seemed necessary to him. He bombed and gassed his people. He tortured children—he raped and tortured children to death and dumped their bodies where those who loved them would be sure to see.
Our President made a choice of his own that’s hard to argue with — the decision to keep the USA from diving into yet another bloody tangle in the Middle East. (Bush Minor’s adventure in Iraq did not turn out so well, even if our troops did depose a bloody dictator as bad as Assad.) The President has referred, privately, to the Middle East as a “sh$tshow,” an assessment that’s hard to argue with. So he kept us out of it.  Mostly. There was the often-misrepresented “red line.” The President warned Syria that it would not be allowed to use chemical weapons with impunity. He gave Congress a chance to authorize the use of power against the Assad regime once it was proved that they really had committed that crime. Congress declined. Despite Congress’ failure, the President’s willingness to use force of arms anyway actually resulted in Assad’s admission that the chemical weapons existed and in an international project which disposed of them. So we were extricated. Except…not. The conflict escalated horribly, creating a humanitarian and refugee crisis of historic proportions. Our government tried to discern who the “moderate” rebels are and supported them with arms, enough to keep them going, but not enough to turn the tide against what became the combined force of Russia, Assad, Hezbollah and Iran. And ISIS along with its allies inserted themselves into the mix, looking for an advantage and sullying the rebellion with its presence.
Now it’s all going to crap, and we are implicated. Aleppo has fallen to the Assad regime that owes its success to backing from Russia–from the regime that, it appears, sponsors our current president-elect. To make everything crystal clear, Trump has chosen, for his Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, the chief executive of Exxon Mobil Oil Company, a billionaire who is close, personally and financially to Vladimir Putin and his cronies. (Look for sanctions against Russia, attempts to punish that country for invading its neighbor, to go away.) Very soon, the reconquest of Syria will be complete (possibly absent some conceded territory) and the reprisals will intensify. Already, reports of massacres, rapes, atrocities (including the murder of children) and disappearances are mounting.
What now? Specifically, what can be done in the month before Trump takes office (assuming that charges of Russian interference in our election don’t prevent that)?
• More refugees. As rigorous as our vetting process already is, we can bring more Syrian refugees into shelter here in America. We can facilitate their progress to other places. We can offer food and shelter and counseling and some peace and quiet.
• Safe passage. The world can demand and enforce safe passage out of regime-controlled areas for Syrians who wish to leave. Women are already killing themselves to escape the rape and other forms of torture that capture will mean to them. An international effort can get them out.
• Let’s please try not to screw the Kurds one more time.
• Here’s some clichés and tropes to ban forever: War is Hell; toughness; tough choices; tough (to clarify: the ability to withstand somebody else’s pain is not an admiral strength); “he’s no boy scout”, “the events of today were tragic, but”; tragic, tragedy (we’re talking contingent human choices here, nothing unavoidable); “atrocities on both sides”; “no easy answers”. Just stop with that shit. We are missing a lot of vital information, but that doesn’t mean we are talking about a value judgement-free zone. Mass murder is always wrong. Torture is wrong. Rape is wrong. Destroying hospitals is wrong. Therefore:
• Stop adding to the mess in Yemen. Really.  Just stop. President Obama, we respect and will miss you, but please end this blot on your legacy while you can. (Maybe find what’s left of the rational socialists from the 90s and deal with them. Looking pretty good now, aren’t they?) If we’re going to stay out of the Levantine sh$tshow, let’s really do that. We don’t need Saudi oil that bad anymore.
What we, specifically as Jews, can do: keep saying yes to refugees. To the widow, the orphan and the stranger. That’s what we’re commanded to do.

Aleppo, Trump, Russia and Us Read More »

7 Haiku for Parsha Vayishlach – or How We Got Our Name

I
Send the fam across
the river. Esau’s coming.
He may hold a grudge.

II
When you tangle with
angels, they may change your name.
Jacob – God Wrestler.

III
Blood is thicker than
stolen birthright we learn from
two weeping brothers.

IV
Family reunion
denouement. They return home
or to a new home.

V
Oh men of Shechem
Dinah has many brothers.
They’ll take your foreskin.

VI
Farewell Rachel. and
farewell Isaac. Two founding
parents leave this story.

VII
In case you wondered
how Esau turned out, here are
the kings he sired.

7 Haiku for Parsha Vayishlach – or How We Got Our Name Read More »

Israel’s “Sand Storm” eliminated in Oscar race

 Israel’s hopes for an Oscar as best foreign-language film were dashed Thursday evening (12/15) when “Sand Storm” failed to make the cut as competing entries from 85 countries were narrowed to nine semi-finalists.
Noticeably, however, three of the nine movies on the shortlist deal with the Nazi era, indicating once again the hold that World War II and Holocaust themes have on the imagination of filmmakers.
The elimination of “Sand Storm” spelled the end, for now, of a Cinderella story, in which Elite Zexer, in her first feature film, dominated the Israeli equivalent of the Academy Awards, winning six “Ophirs,” including best picture and best director.
Centered on a clash between tradition and modernity in a Bedouin village, the film, set in the Negev and entirely in Arabic, has won top prizes at international film festivals in Taiwan, South Korea, Seattle and Jerusalem and the World Cinema Grand Jury Prize at Sundance.
Among the nine surviving entries are Russia’s “Paradise,” Norway’s “The King’s Choice,” and Denmark’s “Land of Mine.”
The Danish entry represents perhaps the most unlikely twist in a movie about the World War II era. During their occupation of Denmark the Germans, guessing mistakenly that the Allies would invade Europe by landing on the Danish west coast, had seeded the beaches with land mines.
At war’s end, the Danish army rounded up a group of young German soldiers, still in their teens, and had them walk across the beaches to dig out and defuse the mines.
Day after day, more and more of the Germans, driven by a sadistic Danish sergeant, were blown up, so that even the most anti-German viewer can’t help but sympathize with the youngsters and detest their overseer.
Norway presents a more traditional view of resistance to Nazi occupation in “The King’s Choice.” In April 1940, Nazi forces invaded Norway by sea and demanded that King Haakon capitulate. The monarch refused and, in exile, orchestrated his countrymen’s resistance to the German occupation.
At the center of Russia’s entry, “Paradise,” is a Russian noblewoman, working as a fashion editor in Paris, who is thrown into a concentration camp during the Nazi occupation for sheltering two Jewish children.
Other movies making the shortlist are Australia’s “Tanna,” Canada’s “It’s Only the End of the World,” Germany’s “Toni Erdmann,” Iran’s “The Salesman,” Sweden’s “A Man Called Ove” and Switzerland’s “My Life as a Zucchini.”
Given the complicated voting system for selecting the best international picture, some early favorites, such as France’s “Elle” and Chile’s “Neruda” were also eliminated.
The list of nine movies will be narrowed to five on Jan. 24, when the nominees in all categories will be announced. The ultimate winners will be crowned on Feb. 26 at the Dolby Theatre in Hollywood.
The gala evening will be televised to 225 countries and territories worldwide.
   

Israel’s “Sand Storm” eliminated in Oscar race Read More »

Rosner’s Torah Talk: Parashat Vayishlach with Rabbi Robin Nafshi

Our guest this week is ” target=”_blank”>Parashat Vayishlach (Genesis 32:3-36:43) – features Jacob's meeting with Esau, his wrestling with an angel, the defiling of Dinah, the death of Isaac and Rachel, and the renaming of Jacob. Our discussion focuses on the turmoil behind the Jacob and Essau reconciliation scene.

Our past discussions of Vayishlach:

Rabbi Susan Leider on ” target=”_blank”>the idea of Jacob as Esau's twin and how it impacts Jacob's life

Rabbi Gideon Sylvester on Rosner’s Torah Talk: Parashat Vayishlach with Rabbi Robin Nafshi Read More »

With Friends Like David Friedman – We Jews don’t need enemies!!!!

I have been dismayed and outraged by a number of President-Elect Trump's cabinet appointments and by Trump's continuing refusal to condemn explicitly anti-Semitism, racism, misogyny, Islamophobia, and bigotry of all kinds.

As an American and someone who is deeply concerned about climate change and the need to reduce fossil fuels, who worries about the state of public education in America as the great democratic equalizer, and as someone who has served as a public servant for decades and who is finely attuned to and sensitive to the corruption that conflict of interest in leaders can cause, I am alarmed as an American citizen by the policy and ethics dimension of this new administration.

As a Zionist leader, I'm flabbergasted by Trump's appointment of David Friedman as the new US Ambassador to Israel. Friedman's utter lack of diplomatic experience and apparent lack of understanding of the complexities of Middle East politics, and his outright support for the building of and expansion of Jewish settlements in the still-contested West Bank territories that are regarded as “occupied” by the international community ought to be enough to eliminate him entirely from consideration as America's chief diplomat to Israel.

Further – his open hostility to a large segment of the American pro-Israel Zionist community in J Street who Friedman slanders as equivalent to “kapos” and anti-Israel – bodes badly for the American Jewish community and for the Jewish people as a whole.

His appointment ought to be condemned by anyone who loves Israel and who is concerned about its Jewish and democratic future.

Note: I speak here as an individual and do not necessarily represent my synagogue or any Jewish organization.

With Friends Like David Friedman – We Jews don’t need enemies!!!! Read More »

Hebrew Word of the Week: urim ve-tummim

Apparently, two objects used by the High Priest (ha-Kohen ha-Gadol) for casting lots, to know “guilty” or “innocent, “yes” or “no” questions (Exodus 28:30; Leviticus 8:8; Ezra 2:63). But also by individuals, as when “Saul inquired of the Lord … either by dreams or by an oracle (Urim) or by prophets” (1 Samuel 28:6).  

Usually translated “Light and Truth,” “Lights and Perfections,” or “Revelations and Truth.”*

Traditionally, Urim is seen as plural of ur “(fire)light” and tummim as plural of tom “innocence” (as be-tom-lev “in good faith”); compare to tam (as the third child in Passover haggadah) or tamim “innocent.” In Israeli Hebrew, Chanukah is often called Hag ha-urim “Holiday of Lights.”

* The seal of Yale University, one of the oldest in America, uses the Hebrew אורים ותומים and the Latin Lux et Veritas, which also is translated as “light and truth.”


Yona Sabar is a professor of Hebrew and Aramaic in the department of Near Eastern Languages & Cultures at UCLA.

Hebrew Word of the Week: urim ve-tummim Read More »

Will Trump’s ambassador pick box in Netanyahu from the right?

This story originally appeared on “>recommended that Trump oppose the creation of a Palestinian state that forbids the presence of Christian or Jewish citizens, or that discriminates against people on the basis of religion, and not to pressure Israel to withdraw to borders “that make attacks and conflict more likely. Additionally, even before negotiations take place between the two sides, the U.S. should recognize Jerusalem as the eternal and indivisible capital of the Jewish state and move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem.”

“Friedman might make policies more than most Ambassadors would if Trump would delegate it to him and take a more hands-off approach, which he seems to indicate he wants to do,” said Professor Brent Sasley, calling the pick ‘dangerous.’ “People like Friedman, and some of the other people in Netanyahu’s government, might push him on some of these issues like Jerusalem, settlements, or annexation of the West Bank that would make things very uncomfortable for Netanyahu. He could feel pushed and boxed-in.”

In a statement on Thursday, Friedman said he is looking forward to representing the U.S. “from the U.S. embassy in Israel’s eternal capital, Jerusalem.”

According to former ADL National Director Abe Foxman, the pick is significant given that Friedman has a longstanding close relationship with Trump, also serving as Trump’s “public voice” and advocate on issues related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Nonetheless, “the bad news may be that he has espoused publicly positions which may be to the right of the Israeli society and the current Israeli government position on a two-state solution,” said Foxman.

Sasley explained to Jewish Insider that Friedman’s loyalty and commitment to changing longstanding U.S. policy in the region are likely the reason Trump based his decision upon. Trump “chooses people who are very loyal or controllable and therefore thinks that they will be better for him rather than those with policy-making experience, or he picks people who he thinks shares some vague commitment of shaking things up and completely changing things,” he asserted. “I think the Friedman pick fits into that. He fits in very nicely to what has become the real right wing of the American Jewish pro-Israel community.”

Trump suggested that the appointment, coming days after his pick of Rex Tillerson as Secretary of State, enforces his commitment to a strong U.S.-Israel relationship. “The bond between Israel and the United States runs deep, and I will ensure there is no daylight between us when I’m President,” Trump said in a statement. “As the United States’ Ambassador to Israel, David Friedman will maintain the special relationship between our two countries. He has been a long-time friend and trusted advisor to me. His strong relationships in Israel will form the foundation of his diplomatic mission and be a tremendous asset to our country as we strengthen the ties with our allies and strive for peace in the Middle East.”

J Street and the Union for Reform Judaism criticized the appointment from a policy standpoint. “This nomination is reckless, putting America’s reputation in the region and credibility around the world at risk,” J Street President Jeremy Ben-Ami said in a statement.

URJ’s Rabbi Rick Jacobs said in a statement that the great concern is that Friedman doesn’t share the commitment of a majority of Americans for a two-state solution. “Mr. Friedman’s personal connection to and support of a number of organizations committed to building additional settlements in the West Bank certainly suggests that he will not be an advocate for a two-state solution,” he stated.

The pick is clearly designed to “send a signal that there will be a change in tone, style and perhaps substance in the US-Israeli relationship from the Obama administration,” said Aaron David Miller, a Middle East analyst and Vice President for New Initiatives at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. The key question is “how much influence will he actually exert on the president and in the circle of his national security advisers.”

“Ambassadors usually don’t have much” influence, Miller told Jewish Insider. “In fact, if the past several Administrations are any indication, the Ambassador is often bypassed as presidents and Israeli PM’s create higher level channels of communication.”

The Republican Jewish Coalition, while staying silent on the appointment of Tillerson, lauded the nomination of Friedman as sending a powerful signal of the next administration’s Israel policy.

“The selection of Mr. David Friedman to serve as United States Ambassador to Israel sends a powerful signal to the Jewish community and the State of Israel that President-elect Trump’s administration will strengthen the bond between our two countries and advance the cause of peace within the region,” RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks said in a statement. “We look forward to working with David and the entire Trump administration to cripple Iran’s ability to develop nuclear weapons through new and strengthened sanctions, move the U.S. embassy to the eternal capital of Israel, Jerusalem, and repair relations with our greatest ally in the Middle East that have eroded over the last eight years.”

The NJDC raised concern about Friedman’s lack of experience in the diplomatic field. “Trump must stand for a strong US-Israel relationship and take it seriously,” the Jewish Democratic group said in a statement on Twitter. “Hasn’t ever been a less experienced pick for US Ambassador to Israel.

Will Trump’s ambassador pick box in Netanyahu from the right? Read More »

Letters to the Editor: Torah Portion, Donald Trump

Please Put the Torah in Torah Portion

The well of Jewish wisdom is infinitely deep, and our people thirst for knowledge of our tradition. Would it be too much to ask that all of our learned rabbanim you invite to give us divrei Torah eschew personal experience and stick to the actual portion of the week with the commentaries of our sages?

Cantor Gary Shapiro, Congregation Beth Israel, Los Angeles

How Far Jews Have Come

I appreciated Danielle Berrin’s “Jewish Families in the White House” (Nov. 9) because it shows that by having a president who has a Jewish daughter, it shows how far the Jewish people have come. We were once in concentration camps, treated as less than everyone else; soon we’ll have a Jew in the first family. It shows how Jews are not less than the other nations. 

Elinor Massachi, Encino

What Trump’s Victory Means

Dear David Suissa: You and Rob Eshman don’t seem to get it. We elected Donald Trump to do precisely the things he said he’d do. We put him in specifically to deliver major change we so desperately need. So please, get over this idea of “WHEW! Thank goodness he didn’t really mean all that” and “What a relief, things will soon be back to normal.” I know you “progressives” love normalcy, and you’re the most stubbornly resistant to change. As such, you totally miss the purpose of this historic election. How very “conservative” of you.

Aric Zoe Leavitt via email

In his op-ed (“Trump’s Victory a Win for Traditional Jews,” Dec. 9), Rabbi Pini Dunner seems to celebrate the Trump election as a victory of “traditional values” over the “corrosive progressive agenda.” On the same page, there is a cartoon by Steve Greenberg in which our president-elect leads a team of early humanoids to destroy the forces trying to tone down hate, consumer rights, the environment, health coverage and public education.

Are these some of the “corrosive forces” that our “traditional values” must fight against?

I congratulate your editorial team for placing these two items on the same page.

Michael Telerant, Los Angeles

Dunner’s op-ed that Trump’s victory is a win for traditional Jews is bordering on delusion. Trump nominated a man to oversee the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) who was suing the EPA and connected to the oil industry. Tell this traditional Jew how breathing polluted air and drinking foul water is good for us.

Rick Edelsein, Los Angeles

Like Dennis Prager (“Please Keep Calling Us Racists and Misogynists,” Nov. 16), I choose to believe that most of those who voted for Donald Trump are neither racists nor misogynists. But clearly a sizable and vocal minority are.

Emboldened by things said, and never repudiated by the president-elect and his supporters, they are spewing hate and threats more openly and frequently; harassing Muslim Americans, Latinos, African-Americans, Jews and women — online, on the streets and in schools. Sadly, I’m hearing firsthand accounts.

Mr. Prager, I trust that “they” are not part of the “us” you refer to in the headline on your piece. And per your recent contention that America is “the least racist country in recorded history,” you will expect the president-elect and his team, and all proud conservatives, to denounce such behavior unequivocally, specifically and consistently. 

As we enter a new chapter offering an even greater opportunity to see how conservative policies serve us as a nation, maybe there’s room for teshuvah across the spectrum.

Michael Zucker, Culver City

Reactions to Castro’s Death

Doesn’t Dennis Prager know that history is the only objective judge for historical events and people making those events (“A Question for Progressive Readers,” Dec. 9)? I was born and spent most of my life in a totalitarian regime, so I know better than most Americans what life in such a regime is like. All statements you quoted in your column from those leaders are opinions. All except the last one from President-elect Donald Trump are diplomatic because they are coming from leaders who are, above all, diplomats.

Now, to answer your question: I agree mostly with President Barack Obama’s statement being the closest to history’s right to be the best judge. “History will record and judge the … enormous impact … ” is a world-class leader’s statement.

Svetlozar Garmidolov, Los Angeles

Letters to the Editor: Torah Portion, Donald Trump Read More »

Chanukah show adds Jewish flavor to ‘Nutcracker’

Tchaikovsky ain’t got nothing on “The MeshugaNutcracker,” a Chanukah-fied rendition of the holiday classic, running Dec. 17 to Jan. 1 in Gindi Auditorium at American Jewish University in Los Angeles. Sure, there’s no Snow Queen or Rat King, but there are human dreidels.

 “We always joke, ‘Is Tchaikovsky rolling in his grave?’ ” said Shannon Guggenheim, the show’s producer, co-writer and choreographer, and an actress appearing in the musical comedy, which she admitted is “very tongue-in-cheek.” 

Guggenheim has staged the show with her husband, Scott, and brother-in-law Stephen for the past 13 years. “It’s our bat mitzvah year!” she quipped.

The idea for “The MeshugaNutcracker” first came about when Guggenheim, a San Jose local and a Jew by Choice, was pregnant with her first child and, in her own words, “a December dilemma was fresh on our minds.” For Guggenheim, that dilemma could be summed up in two words: “The Nutcracker.”

 “Even though families were Jewish, they were going to ‘The Nutcracker,’ they were going to ‘A Christmas Carol,’ they were going to have all these great holiday experiences because they wanted something to do with their families even though it didn’t speak to their culture,” she said. 

It’s no secret that Chanukah’s menorah always gets overshadowed by the Christmas tree. So the Guggenheims, expectant parents and theater lovers, decided to do something about it in 2003. “It started out as, ‘Could we do a show about Chanukah and what would that look like?’ ” Guggenheim said.

This was the start of “The MeshugaNutcracker,” a musical comedy told by the fools of Chelm, a slapstick shtetl popularized in Jewish folklore. There are eight stories in total, each one illuminating a theme celebrated during the Festival of Lights. 

 “It is lighthearted. There is so much comedy, silliness and exuberance, but we temper it with this idea that we can’t be where we are today without remembering those who came before us,” Guggenheim said, referring to the show’s moments of reflection, whether about the Maccabean war (“a devastating three-year-long battle”) or the Holocaust. 

During the show’s 13-year run, it has raised more than $250,000 for charitable organizations, including day schools, synagogues and federations. Still open for nonprofits to participate, a portion of the ticket price is donated when ticket buyers use a code belonging to the nonprofit of their choice. “It’s all about giving back,” Guggenheim said.

The last time “The MeshugaNutcracker” was in Los Angeles was in 2006, having played since then in San Francisco and San Jose.

During the play’s intermission, concessions will include holiday staples like latkes and sufganiyot, Chanukah cards, dreidels and gelt. 

Next year, Guggenheim hopes to take the show to New York. “We have a lead on a venue and we’re hoping it will still be available to us next winter,” she said. 

In association with Fathom Events, this year’s production will be filmed and broadcast via high-definition streaming to movie theaters across the country. 

“There is nothing else out there that truly celebrates Chanukah on the same scale, along the same importance as ‘White Christmas’ or ‘Nutcracker.’ We need something that is Chanukah,” Guggenheim said. 

Her daughter Lily, now 14, has grown up with this show, which converts Tchaikovsky’s trademark melodies into klezmer-inspired Chanukah ballads.

 “Certainly my favorite memory is when she was 3 or 4 and we were in an elevator,” Guggenheim said. “It was the holiday season and piping through the music was one of the songs in ‘The Nutcracker.’ And she went, ‘Mom! They’re playing your song!’ ”

Chanukah show adds Jewish flavor to ‘Nutcracker’ Read More »