fbpx

May 27, 2015

Our moral obligation to be a voice for the homeless

Apathy —  noun; absence or suppression of passion, emotion or excitement.

I write this with a broken heart. I serve many roles in the community, including that of a county-appointed commissioner to the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority. Today I write not as a commissioner — I do not speak for the commission — but for myself, a rabbi who sees the yawning chasm between the golden dreams of what our city could be and the iron-hard realities of what our city is. 

The other night I sat in the commission hearing during which we released the homelessness count for Los Angeles County. The numbers are shameful. Homelessness is up 12 percent across the county in just two years. Veteran homelessness has remained relatively flat, despite the millions of dollars poured into the region by the federal government. The number of individuals taking refuge in tents, vehicles and other makeshift shelters climbed 85 percent. Skid Row used to be the center of homelessness in America; now it, too, has replicated the ubiquitous model of urban sprawl with new subdivisions cropping up across the county. There are now as many homeless men, women and children in our area as the total capacities of Staples Center, The Forum and Pauley Pavilion combined

Homelessness is terminal in Los Angeles. You can be robbed, raped, assaulted or even murdered. You live in constant fear of others on the street and of the authorities. Leundeu Keunang and Brendon Glenn, two homeless men, were fatally shot by officers during the last two months. Our county is in a state of crisis.

Whatever you feel about adults who are homeless, you can never say that a child would choose to be born to a mother who is homeless. Eric Rice, an associate professor at USC, has found that 42 percent of youths who experience homelessness were in the foster care system, and 27 percent were gay, lesbian or bisexual, as illustrated by the story of the 16-year-old girl who was booted to the street because her parents found the love note she wrote to her girlfriend. He writes, “More upsetting is that 50 percent reported being abused by their families, and 44 percent reported being kicked out of their home, forcing them into homelessness at some point.” Statewide, there are more than half a million children who are homeless. Youth homelessness leads to dropping out of high school, underachievement and incarceration. We are 48th in the nation in the extent of child homelessness, and we are 49th in state planning. We are not only near the bottom, we are planning to go even lower. 

I know, however, that there is a monumental effort by activists who are trying to house those without shelter. The good news in this very dark time is that Los Angeles has invested more resources than ever in ending homelessness. There is a coordinated entry system that seeks to align priorities between governmental and nonprofit agencies. There are huge efforts to provide vouchers for people who are homeless in order to rehouse them rapidly. There is intense focus on the Housing First model, in which those who have been on the street the longest and have debilitating conditions are given apartments with wrap-around social supports. But as these numbers show, the problem is getting worse, not better.

Have we failed? 

Yes, but not because we aren’t building shelters. Our shameful failure is to see homelessness as a unique problem, something that can be fixed through building a larger system of shelters. What this moment calls for, however, is a radical shift in our thinking. Homelessness is a symptom of a greater disease, not the disease itself. Homelessness is an indicator of our nation’s lack of moral strength to deal with poverty.

We live in a world that blames the poor for their poverty, the homeless for their sluggishness and their lack of will. We are trained into apathy by the stoic notion that sympathy for the poor is an unwise passion that must be purged from our consciousness. We have internalized the dark counsel of Nietzsche, who excoriates the weak by framing them as tricksters who try to unseat the powerful through their sheer meekness. We live in a land that has contempt for the poor. They speak as if poverty is unrelated to sickness. They speak as if poverty is unrelated to old age. They speak as if poverty is unrelated to the despair of our leaders. They speak as if poverty is unrelated to new immigrants. They speak as if poverty is the fault of the poor, who are taking advantage of the rest of society. We listen to the dark voice that says to us, “Rid yourself of your liberal guilt and your bleeding heart. This is not your problem. Mish zich nisht arein — ‘do not get involved.’ ”

Do we not remember as Jews that we once knew what it was to lay out our necks under the heels of power? Are we so quick to embrace cultural amnesia that we have forgotten that we were once a homeless nation? How has the foreign ethic of apathy seeped so deeply into our collective souls? Our Jewish understanding of the world does not come from secular liberalism. It comes from the prophets. When we hear the voice of apathy emerge, we must remember the other voice that cries out through millennia: 

“Listen to this, you who devour the needy, annihilating the poor of the land, saying, ‘If only the new moon were over, so that we could sell grain; the Sabbath, so that we could offer wheat for sale,’ using an ephah that is too small and shekel that is too big, tilting a dishonest scale, and selling grain refuse as grain! We will buy the poor for silver, the need for a pair for sandals. The Lord swears by the pride of Jacob, ‘I will never forget any of their doings.’ Shall not the Earth shake for this …?” (Amos 8:4-8)

We must be proud as Jews that our greats, our statesmen and our prophets saw life through the eyes of the oppressed and spoke with anger and thundered against those who had become so hard of heart that they begrudged the poor. We are the people of the prophets and the children of the prophets. Shall we not take up their call to embody the Divine concern for justice? Shall we not shake the Earth? 

What makes for a great city? Is it its sunny beaches and rolling hills? Is it the heights of its skyscrapers or the extent of its art collection? No. It is our ability to let all who are hungry, eat; all who need a bed, a place to rest; all who need refuge, a place to call home. We must go to sleep tonight dreaming of a better tomorrow, and we must wake up in the morning to pursue those dreams. The only way to solve the problem of homelessness is to put the blaring light of justice on our collective shame and draw together in harmony the voices of our city to say enough is enough! We must sing out from the chambers of City Hall. Sing out from the pews and from the shelters. We must sing out from office buildings, the hospitals and the nonprofit agencies. No longer can we be fettered by the chains of our apathy. No longer can we say that what happens in Venice or on Skid Row is not my problem. No longer can we despair. We must put our shoulder to the wheel and focus our energy.  

Remember the words of Rabbi Hayim of Brisk, who said to be a rabbi is to “redress the grievances of those who are abandoned and alone … protect the poor and to save the oppressed from the hands of the oppressor.” Speak to your congregations, move the Earth. The time for your leadership is now. We need more funding from the city to be allocated to homelessness services. Speak to your councilmember. We need to pass legislation that restores funding from the state to build more affordable housing. Speak to your state representative. We need more communities in this fight. Speak to them and they will listen. 

To end homelessness, we need to heed the prophetic call to stem the flow of families falling into poverty and slipping through the bottom of the safety net. We need the strength of all of our hands to lift this very heavy burden. My teacher Rabbi Harold Schulweis taught me a poignant story: There was a certain Jew in Sodom and Gomorrah who preached against the injustices found there. For his troubles, he was mocked by all who knew him. “Why do you break your heart speaking to these people who are resolved not to change?” He answered, “I do not do this for their sake alone. I do it for my own sanity.” 

We must all be a sane voice in an insane world, if not for the sake of the needy, then for our own.


Rabbi Noah Zvi Farkas is associate rabbi at Valley Beth Shalom in Encino and founder of Netiya, a faith-based network that advances urban agriculture in synagogues, schools and nonprofit organizations in Los Angeles.

Our moral obligation to be a voice for the homeless Read More »

Military chaplains gather to answer call of duty

It’s not easy being an observant Jew in the military sometimes, especially under extreme circumstances. What do you do, for example, if there’s no kosher pot that can be used for cooking?

Rabbi Avrohom Teichman of certifying agency Kehillah Kosher offered an answer to a collection of chaplains and community members on May 14 during a gathering sponsored by Jewish Friends of the American Armed Forces (JFAAF): Any pot can be used as long as no one has cooked treif in it during the previous 24 hours. 

“There are certain circumstances when you’re stuck that you can follow minority opinion,” he said. “[When you’re in the military], it’s considered a pressing circumstance, and not the normal halachic circumstance.”

Twelve Orthodox chaplains in the United States Army, National Guard, Marines and Navy gathered May 13-17 at Beth Jacob Congregation in Pico-Robertson to meet one another, undergo training, and interact with the community to show who they are and what they do. 

“The community here in Los Angeles came out, showed their appreciation and made relationships with the chaplains. They saw that these chaplains are a light unto the nations in the U.S. military,” said Rabbi David Becker, who started JFAAF and serves as its director. 

The chaplains at the event, all ordained rabbis, serve more than 21,000 Jewish members of the military, offering spiritual and emotional guidance as well as helping celebrate Shabbat and other holidays. 

According to Becker, chaplains must have a master’s of divinity or an equivalent degree, along with smichah (rabbinic ordination). Then they go through tests and interviews administered by a board of chaplains. He helps candidates by recruiting and training them with supplies provided by Yeshiva Pirchei Shoshanim. 

At the local series of events, the chaplains sat in on shiurim (classes) detailing how they could fulfill their rabbinic duties, prayed together, and ate meals with one another in homes, restaurants and synagogues across the area. 

Rabbi Daniel Lapin of the American Alliance of Jews and Christians gave a class called “Safeguarding Our Relations With Chaplains of Other Faiths.” The chaplains also attended a presentation on suicide prevention. Becker said during this class, they learned “how to recognize the symptoms and the telltale signs to be able to help, even if it means having to [send the person to] visit the base’s medical clinic.” 

During a Friday night dinner at LINK, the Los Angeles Intercommunity Kollel, Army Reserve Maj. Elan Carr (a former California Congressional candidate) spoke about his experience attending Chanukah services at Saddam Hussein’s former presidential palace in Iraq, while Lapin gave a speech related to Shavuot.

Rabbi Aaron Kleinman, a chaplain and Navy lieutenant stationed in San Diego, said seeing his peers gave him “moral support” and also taught him “how to deal with current, pressing halachic issues.” 

Rabbi Kevin Bemel, a Navy chaplain serving in Ventura County, never had the chance to interact with Jewish chaplains in other branches of the military until the JFAAF gathering took place. 

“Meeting them and learning about the situations they face is very useful,” he said.

For his part, Bemel said he tries to be of assistance to the handful of Jewish sailors and Marines on his base by holding Chanukah parties, Rosh Hashanah services and large Passover seders. “I try to mark Jewish holidays with some kind of event,” he said.

On a day-to-day basis, Bemel’s duties include helping sailors and Marines — Jewish or not — deal with personal and career challenges. 

“They could be involved in some sort of disciplinary issue, or they may be looking for some emotional or spiritual support,” he said. “On my base, I take care of everybody.”

Rabbi Dovid Egert, a lieutenant in the Air Force, said as a chaplain, he’s there for his airmen when they need to talk about issues they’re going through. 

“They don’t want to have to go to their first commanders and say they’re having problems,” he said. “They need a chaplain who they can feel comfortable talking to and who will make them feel better.” 

Now, if he ever needs someone to ask for assistance with his position, he can lean upon his fellow chaplains. 

“I know whom to call,” he said. “I am better affiliated to help people out now.”

Military chaplains gather to answer call of duty Read More »

Harvey Schechter, former ADL regional director, dies at 91

Harvey Bernard Schechter died peacefully at the Los Angeles Jewish Home in Reseda on May 23, 2015, at the age of 91. Harvey is survived by his wife of sixty years, Hope Schechter of Beverly Hills, his nephew Bruce Schechter of Sherman Oaks and many additional family members and close friends.  Harvey was preceded in death by his parents Dora and Morris Schechter of New York, elder brother Harold Schechter (Diana) of Huntington Beach and younger sister Mildred Berger (Harvey) of New Hyde Park, New York.

Harvey was born on January 4, 1924, in Brooklyn, New York.  As a boy Harvey developed his love of baseball which he carried throughout his life, even attending Dodger Fantasy Baseball Camp at age 70. In his youth he was stricken with rheumatic fever which damaged his heart. His illness and a near brush with death led his parents to send Harvey from New York to a warmer climate in Southern California for his schooling. Harvey completed his undergraduate coursework at UC Santa Barbara while living and working on a ranch in Rancho Oso near the UCSB campus. Harvey was a celebrity on campus where he arrived daily on his trusted horse, “Chica.” Ever passionate about education, Harvey became a trustee at the University of Santa Barbara in 1996, a position he held to his death.

After his undergraduate studies, Harvey went on to earn a Master's Degree in Sociology from UCLA in 1950. In September of that same year, Harvey met his future wife, Hope Mendoza, while working on a grant proposal and studying the International Ladies Garment Workers' Union where Hope was employed. The two were married on March 20, 1955, in San Marino, CA, and in 1959, they purchased their first and only home in Sherman Oaks, CA. That San Fernando Valley home served as a backdrop for many memorable backyard parties, weddings, and Seders over their years there.  In addition to Bruce, Harvey and Hope have many “adopted” daughters and sons whom Harvey affectionately mentored including family members, friends and fellow employees and students.

In his early years, Harvey had a variety of jobs including one with the Department of Agriculture as a lab assistant in Salinas, CA,  a job in New York building radios for fighter planes during WWII (due to his poor health he was listed as 4S and unable to serve during the war), a brief stint at the post office, work as a teacher's assistant at UCLA, and part-time  teaching at Leo Baeck Temple. 

In 1952, Harvey started his long and illustrious career with the Anti-Defamation League in Los Angeles.   Harvey joined ADL the day after Eisenhower was elected in November 1952.  Harvey came in as Director of Civil Rights and Fact-Finding.  Milton Senn, the region’s first regional director, was his boss and quickly became his hero and mentor. 

Eight years later, Harvey was appointed Western States Fact-Finding Director, supervising ADL's investigative and civil rights activities in the western United States. He performed these duties until 1974, when he was appointed Regional Director.  In 1986, Harvey was named Western States Director, supervising ADL's seven regional offices in the West.  He served from 1990 until he retired in 1993 as Western States Director of the ADL Foundation.

In all, he worked for ADL for 41 years, twelve as Regional Director.  He fought discrimination in housing, public accommodations, employment, and quotas in college admissions.  He monitored and reported on extremists such as the American Nazi Party and John Birch Society in their early years.  His tenure also overlapped with the passage of the Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act.  His passion for the ADL never waned. 

His writings were published by the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and the Los Angeles Daily News. Newspapers across the nation published interviews with him on issues of concern to ADL, the Jewish community, and the total community.  He also appeared on numerous television and radio programs.  In 1960, he authored ADL's pamphlet, HOW TO LISTEN TO A JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY SPEAKER.  And Harvey was a mentor, confidant, friend, teacher, and inspiration to thousands during his lengthy career with the Anti-Defamation League. 

A lifelong learner, in retirement Harvey enjoyed taking classes at Los Angeles Valley College. He and Hope also kept active with UCSB events, Jewish community happenings, L.A. Philharmonic concerts, travel, movies, restaurant dining, visits with family and friends, and more.

Harvey’s sage advice, tutelage, and common sense approach to life endeared him to many. As Harvey signed off on each “Schechter Sez” blog, “Be well because all else is bubkiss.”

In lieu of flowers, donations to the Pacific Southwest Region of the Anti-Defamation League or the needy student fund at UC Santa Barbara in Harvey’s memory will be appreciated.

Harvey Schechter, former ADL regional director, dies at 91 Read More »

President Obama vs. the LA Times on anti-Semitism

The Obama White House and the opinion page of the Los Angeles Times are usually in sync—but not always.  Take for example the recent conflict between President Obama and Palestinocentric UCLA Professor Saree Makdisi on anti-Semitism and how to combat it.

In a much-discussed recent interview with Jeffrey Goldberg in The Atlantic, the President argued that his Iran policy was our best chance of curbing not only the Iranian nuclear threat, but the mullahs’ support of a global jihad preaching and practicing Jew hatred. Some of us were not convinced. However, when it came to recognizing the linkage between anti-Semitism and criticism of Israel carried to the extreme of questioning the Jewish state’s right to exist, the President was right on. This is what he said:

“I think a good baseline is: Do you think that Israel has a right to exist as a homeland for the Jewish people, and are you aware of the particular circumstances of Jewish history that might prompt that need and desire? And if your answer is no, if your notion is somehow that that history doesn’t matter, then that’s a problem, in my mind. If, on the other hand, you acknowledge the justness of the Jewish homeland, you acknowledge the active presence of anti-Semitism—that it’s not just something in the past, but it is current—if you acknowledge that there are people and nations that, if convenient, would do the Jewish people harm because of a warped ideology. If you acknowledge those things, then you should be able to align yourself with Israel where its security is at stake, you should be able to align yourself with Israel when it comes to making sure that it is not held to a double standard in international fora, you should align yourself with Israel when it comes to making sure that it is not isolated.”

Without using the term, President Obama was essentially embracing the U.S. State Department’s definition of anti-Semitism as “a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.” The definition specifically includes as examples accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust, and  accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interest of their own nations.

The State Department’s definition is currently in the news because University of California President Janet Napolitano gave it her personal endorsement, prior to a UC Regents Board meeting, scheduled for July, which will debate adopting the definition as a new guideline for U.C. campuses.

Here in the LA Times (May 26 issue) comes in Professor Makdisi who ignores President Obama but frontally assaults UC President Napolitano for the effrontery of disclosing that—like the U.S. State Department and the U.S. President—she believes there is an inherent linkage between anti-Semitism and criticism of Israel’s right to exist: criticism which Makdisi considers a benign and sacrosanct form of “anti-Zionism.”

According to Makdisi, to call out anti-Zionists who urge the destruction of the Jewish state for “delegitimizing” and demonizing” Israel is an attempt to “stifle academic freedom and “pre­empt crit­i­cism of Is­raeli poli­cies.” This is patent nonsense. Criticize Israeli government policies—including settlement policies—all you want. Just don’t cross the line by demanding that Israel, a UN member state with six million Jewish and two million Arab citizens, commit national suicide because it “has no right to exist.”

Makdisi has no problem with shutting down forms of campus advocacy that threaten the status and self-esteem of students on the basis of their gender or sexual orientation. Earlier this year in another LA Times’ op ed, he even questioned the right of Paris’ murdered Charlie Hebdo cartoonists to satirize the Prophet Mohammed.  But when it comes to campus advocacy—and actions—that marginalize Jewish students by charging them with “dual loyalties” and by tauntingly raising the specter of another Jewish genocide in the Middle East, Makdisi believes that “anything goes, and that free speech provides an impenetrable suit of armor to protect  toxic forms of speech and conduct on campus.

A case in point about the linkage between verbal incitement against Israel’s right to exist and actions meant to intimidate Jewish students is Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), which Profess Makdisi endows with a halo as a hero of the academic free speech crusade. The real track record of the SJP and its campus bullies includes shouting down or disrupting pro-Israel speakers, beating up Jewish students who dare to speak up against anti-Israel incitement, presenting Jewish dorm residents with mock eviction notices because of Israeli policies, and demanding at UCLA that Jewish candidates for student body office sign “loyalty oaths” that they have never made a trip to Israel sponsored by a Jewish organization. 

The colleges and universities where the SJP, Makdisi’s folk heroes or martyrs for free speech, have been investigated or sanctioned for actions—not just words—verging over into anti-Semitism include Northeastern University, Vassar, and Loyola University-Chicago.

Makdisi also cites in support of his position the dismissal by the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights (OCR) of complaints against Berkeley UC Irvine, and UC Irvine for allowing groups like the SJP to create a hostile learning environment for Jewish students, in violation of Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. In fact, the UC Santa Cruz complaints—which were copiously documented—were dismissed by OCR higher ups against the advice of their own regional office and contrary to their own internal rules.  The anti-Zionist lobby’s “victories” at UC Berkeley and elsewhere were also hollow because the cases against them were largely dismissed on narrow procedural grounds, not because groups like the SJP were really vindicated.

President Napolitano and President Obama are on spot-on regarding the issue of when “Anti-Zionism” crosses the line into anti-Semitism.  And we applaud them for calling out anti-Semitism when it masquerades, with righteous indignation, as anything but.

Rabbi Meyer H. May is Executive Director of the Simon Wiesenthal Center; Historian Harold Brackman is a consultant to the Center.

President Obama vs. the LA Times on anti-Semitism Read More »

Obituaries: Week of May 29-June 3

Joan Adelman died May 5 at 72. Survived by daughter Lisa (Charles) Oxman; son David (Sheri); 3 grandchildren; sister Sandra Zivick. Hillside

Valerie Bass died April 30 at 77. Survived by daughter Deborah (Richard) Brada; son Daryl; sister June Allen; 2 grandchildren. Hillside

Harriet Beck died April 29 at 90. Survived by sons Dennis (Pamela), Ron (Cynthia Lewis); daughter Maralee; son-in-law Andy Safir; 9 grandchildren; 2 great-grandchildren. Hillside

Gilbert Bogos died May 2 at 84. Survived by wife Joanne; daughters Lauren (Terry) Schoneberg, Dana (Laurent) Gache; 2 grandchildren. Hillside

Julius Bovill died April 30 at 94. Survived by wife Bloom; son Daniel (Carol); 2 grandchildren; 1 great-grandchild. Hillside

Irwin Burman died May 7 at 92. Survived by wife Lea; sons Steven (Barbara), Barry (Marifer); daughter Marilyn (Anastasia); 4 grandchildren. Groman Eden

Edith Eder died May 2 at 88. Survived by sons Robert (Michele Longo), Alan, Harvey; 3 grandsons. Mount Sinai

Vicki Coine Fischback died April 29 at 65. Survived by son Ari Paul (Susanne) Coine. Hillside

Harry Gartsman died May 4 at 99. Survived by wife Dorothy; daughter Cheryl (Tom) Abel; son Gary (Carol). Hillside

Sylvia Goldfarb died May 5 at 93. Survived by husband Joseph; son Jack (Sherri); daughter Lynne (Jerry H.); 3 grandchildren; sister Ann Lipsman. Hillside

Cheryl B. Jones died May 8 at 50. Survived by husband Scott; daughter Heather Ventura; son Nicholas Ventura; brother Marc (Sarah) Benjamin; 1 sister-in-law. Mount Sinai

Ruth Labgold died May 9 at 84. Survived by son Richard (Annie); daughters Robbin (Xavier Varela) Velasco, Lori (Robin) Roques; 2 grandchildren; 3 great-grandchildren; brother Barry (Linda) Hyman. Mount Sinai

Josephine Marcus died May 4 at 88. Survived by son Jeffrey (Susan); 2 grandchildren; 4 great-grandchildren. Hillside

Geraldine Rudolph died April 28 at 100. Survived by daughters Paula Santangelo, Suzan Austin; sister Naomi Naliboff. Hillside

Rina Semere died May 7 at 60. Survived by son Oscar. Hillside

Mia Sidaros died May 2 at 17. Survived by mother Danielle; father Emed; brother Jacob. Hillside

Charlotte Ukra died May 7 at 85. Survived by husband Bajhat; daughter Tara (Paul) MacMahon; son Mark (Julie); 2 grandchildren; 1 great-grandchild. Hillside

Obituaries: Week of May 29-June 3 Read More »

Jewish Through and Through

My last two novels feature strong Jewish themes.  Yet when I speak to audiences, invariably someone expresses surprise that I am not religious. They are further surprised that I do not even attend synagogue services, yet my writing testifies to being “very Jewish.”

Indeed I am Jewish through and through, but in Israeli fashion, which is vastly different from the American version.

I was born in Tel Aviv to a secular family that, like the most Israelis, did not practice religion. My parents played Canasta with friends on Yom Kippur, while snacking. My mother felt no dissonance between her absence of faith and her enjoyment of cantorial singing.

We never doubted out Jewishness because the country possessed then–and still does–an unmistakably Jewish culture. Even minor holidays are celebrated, almost reflexively: On Shavuot, an agrarian holiday rooted in the history of the Temple destroyed 2,000 years ago, people get together for a festive dairy meal of blintzes. Passover Seder is the most celebrated family event, often with the full reading of the Hagadah–in Hebrew, of course. The mitzvah of inviting those who do not have a Seder became a collective national mission when, in the 1990s, Russians Jews emigrated in droves. Tens of thousands of Israeli families opened their homes to include them in their Seders, thus introducing Russian Jews to traditions they had never experienced before. These days, even if most of my friends do not light the Shabbat candles, it would be inconceivable for their adult children not to show up for Friday dinner. If either party misses it, they make up for it by sharing a late heavy lunch on Shabbat.

In the shopping mall, every store sports a mezuzah on the threshold. Upon finishing combat leadership training, IDF gifts a bible to the each new commander. 

I studied the Bible all of my 12 years at school, plus a year of Talmud, all mandatory by the secular state curriculum. I loved the richness of language and poetic rhythm of the Bible, a book of exquisite literature that was never presented as the word of God, even as He was present on every page. The Bible was a book of living history that was never far either when I dined at a restaurant at the port of Jaffa, from where Jonah had tried to escape God’s mission, or when, 20 minutes out of Tel-Aviv, I passed by the Valley of Elah, where David had defeated Goliath. From sixth grade on, I won Jeopardy-like contests in which I quoted passages and identified dialogue lines, yet, when visiting France after my junior year in high school and asked about prayers, I claimed to know none. It never occurred to me that the dozens of passages I could cite in my sleep were actually sung as prayers, because I had never been to a synagogue.

When a French host said that I belonged to the Chosen People, it confused me. Yes, it was in the Bible, but who took it seriously? Since God was not relevant to our lives, neither His wrath nor His benevolence had a place in our psyche. 

And then there were the Holocaust survivors living all around me. If the subject came up, many of my friends’ parents claimed that “God died in Auschwitz.” And while the Nazis were slaughtering our people, my Sabra parents’ and grandparents’ generations cemented the building blocks that created the miracle that became the State of Israel. Many died in the process, and therefore we resented the Orthodox sector that gave God all the credit. The more extreme among them, the ultra-Orthodox, even denied our right for a state until the messiah arrived. No. This was our Jewish country, rich with our new culture of a revived, beautiful language, its own new songs celebrating every milestone, starting with the first swiveling sprinkle head that brought water to the desert. Our new humor was fed by the stumbling nascent bureaucracy, the shared experience of military service with its idiosyncrasies, and the dozens of accents with which our language was being spoken. In the absence of Hebrew curses, we borrowed them from Arabic, Russian and Polish. We baked under the hot Israeli sun in our shorts, took juicy bites from our home-grown oranges, and defended our new country with our lives—both for ourselves and for the world Jewry.

My protagonist in HOTEL MOSCOW, Brooke Fielding, like many American Jews I’ve met since moving to New York decades ago, felt lost when it came to her Jewish identity. For her, having grown up in the sad home of Holocaust survivors, Jewish history had no depth prior to the 1940s; it was too present, too recent, too painful. Her parents’ Holocaust experiences shadowed her. Her mother refused to discuss God until “He apologized for what he did to us.” When Brooke sought spirituality by visiting a synagogue on Yom Kippur, she was uninspired by the hymns’ fawning to God and His justice while fearing His wrath. She was all too familiar with both His justice and His wrath. There was nowhere else she could turn for spirituality, as New Age spiritualism–shamanism, “sacred” scarves, Goddess Earth ceremonies, or mystical stones–seemed pagan. I sent Brooke to Moscow, where she found a partial answer, not in faith so much as in her Jewish values.

What, then, is a secular Jew? Albert Einstein identified himself as a Jew while rejecting the notion of God. He had been influenced by Baruch Spinoza, a Portuguese-Dutch Jewish philosopher who denied the existence of God as a separate entity from the universe. But Spinoza believed that God had created that universe, thus recognizing Him. In his writing, Sigmund Freud disdained religious beliefs, yet wrote to a Jewish colleague, “If you do not let your son grow up as a Jew, you will deprive him of a source of energy that cannot be replaced by anything else.” Golda Meir, when asked if she believed in God, responded, “I believe in the Jewish people, and the Jewish people believe in God.”

I, too, believe in the Jewish people, and am committed to their future while preserving their past.

Talia Carner’s fourth novel, HOTEL MOSCOW, will be released HarperCollins on June 2nd. It is the story of an American woman who travels to Russia shortly after the fall of communism, becomes embroiled in investigating a business crime, and when facing anti-Semitism, comes to terms with her parents’ Holocaust legacy and her own Jewish identity. For more about the author and the book, please check www.TaliaCarner.com

Jewish Through and Through Read More »

Letters to the Editor: Rabbi Bentzion Kravitz, Centrist Jews and American-Israelis

They Let Us In

Rabbi Bentzion Kravitz implied that those of us representing Beth Emunah Messianic Synagogue were there by deception. I personally submitted the application for the booth at the festival, and filled out all the required information, including the complete name of our synagogue. The coordinators of the event did not question it. 

We are very offended by Kravitz’s comments in his column. We do not consider ourselves missionaries, nor did we do anything at the festival other than have friendly conversations with people who stopped by our booth, just like all the other people staffing booths. We did not distribute fliers outside of our booth, we did not lure anyone into any conversations, nor did we go to other booths to try to convince other people to believe what we believe. If they had questions, we responded.

Barbara Miner, Board chair of Beth Emunah Messianic Synagogue

From the Bleachers

In 1947, three of my Crown Heights yeshiva schoolmates and I decided we needed to go see our Brooklyn Dodgers play (“A Message to Centrist American Jews: Time to Speak Out,” May 22). We knew our parents would not support this enterprise, so we would have to earn the price of admission by doing extra errands, with additional help from an allowance if we were lucky enough to get one. It took us months, but we made it. 

We knew the price of admission to see our beloved Dodgers did not entitle us to enter the field of play. It did not grant us permission to manage the team, and we had no authority to argue the umpire’s decisions.

When E. Robert Goodkind and Martin J. Raffel move their family to Sderot and become part of the community, then and only then will their schemes be taken seriously. While they remain spectators in the bleachers, perhaps they should be practicing the wave … and learning how to cheer for the home team.

Jerry Daniels via fax

Figures Disputed

Didn’t political commentator Shmuel Rosner read the previous week’s Jewish Journal cover story by Jared Sichel on American-Israelis, where demographer Ira Sheskin estimated the number of Israeli-born U.S immigrants as 137,000? Rosner states in his follow-up column: “There are hundreds of thousands of such Israelis — 600,000 to 700,000 according to most estimations” (“Is Honesty the Best Policy With Israeli-Americans?” May 22).  

I don’t know where Rosner gets his estimations of Israeli immigrants to the U.S., surely not from demographers who have researched the subject. I know of no demographer who has ever ventured a number greater than 200,000 Israeli-born immigrants in the U.S. as their highest estimate. I have recently crosschecked Sheskin’s estimates using the 2013 Pew Survey of American Jewry and found 140,000 Israeli-born immigrants in the U.S.

Pini Herman via email

Israeli-Americans

Having lived in Israel for five years, during which I integrated into the country and learned Hebrew, I have a few suggestions for Israelis who make the U.S. their home (“The Israeli-Americans,” May 15).

Living in a foreign country requires knowledge of its culture and norms. The Israeli-American Council (IAC) is a useful bridge between Israel and America, and I wish it had existed when we first came back from Israel. When we returned, my husband and I realized that to raise Jewish children, simply valuing Israel is not enough to avoid assimilation into the predominant (Christian) culture. America doesn’t have a nationwide celebration of Jewish holidays. It is up to Jewish parents to join a synagogue and to encourage their children to join Jewish youth organizations and camps. These can be costly, but don’t be too proud to investigate scholarships. We did. Today we are proud donors to our wonderful shul, Beth Am.

Another reason for Israelis to become active members of Jewish organizations is that many of today’s American Jews don’t support Israel the way their parents did. Having the kind of unwavering support for Israel that an influx of Israelis would provide would, in my opinion, increase support for Israel within the American community.

Thank you to IAC for its extensive efforts in supporting Israel and Israelis (and the Jewish community as a whole), and many thanks to the Jewish Journal for publicizing this worthy publication.

Gabriela Litov, Los Angeles

Letters to the Editor: Rabbi Bentzion Kravitz, Centrist Jews and American-Israelis Read More »

Calendar: May 30–June 5

SAT | MAY 30

AUTOMATIC TOYS FEATURING NACHUM PETERSEIL

Madonna may have said it best: “Music makes the people come together.” Well, at this downtown L.A. interfaith concert, that’s what it will do. This Canadian duo mixes electronic rock with Middle Eastern vibes and encourages a message of peace and acceptance through music. They’ve been gaining steam for a few years now, receiving a title of best new indie band in 2011 and opening for Matisyahu last year. Catch ’em here before they go back on the road. 8 p.m. $15 (online), $20 (at door). Pico Union Project, 1153 Valencia St., Los Angeles. (818) 760-1077. ” target=”_blank”>rubicontheatre.org.

JEWISH SINGLES: COMEDY IMPROV NIGHT

Laughter and love — we’ve always associated the two. Grab a giggle as eligible folks come to watch comedic folks perform. The night features comedian Shelley Pack, a writer and producer who has worked with The Groundlings, Second City, “Whose Line Is It Anyway?” and the Discovery Channel. The event doesn’t discriminate against anyone looking for love, so if you’re a single parent, a young professional or both, you’ll have come to the right place. 9 p.m. $15 (online), $20
(at door). Social Dashboard, 8631 W. Pico Blvd., Los Angeles. SUN | MAY 31

“A MAD MENSCH AFFAIR”

Just because “Mad Men” ended doesn’t mean we have to stop being swanky. IKAR hosts its annual Night of the Wandering Jew event, and this year’s theme will have you Don Draper-ing and Peggy Olson-ing your way through the evening. There will be a creative (and kosher!) take on midcentury favorites such as fondue, fried macaroni-and-cheese balls, deviled eggs, stuffed mushrooms and more! There also will be specialty drinks and great music — a la the 1960s. And if you feel like volunteering a bit, you’re eligible for an entry fee discount. 5 p.m. $175. The Fig House, 6433 N. Figueroa St., Los Angeles. (323) 634-1870. ” target=”_blank”>israeltenniscenters.org.

THUR | JUN 4

“SERIAL” DECONSTRUCTED: EXAMINING THE CASE BEHIND THE PODCAST

It’s “Law & Order” live — sort of. “Serial,” the most downloaded podcast in history, is coming under the microscope of a panel of criminal attorneys. Loyola law professor Laurie Levenson moderates a discussion between Alan Jackson and Caleb Mason on the investigation and prosecution of Adnan Syed for the murder of his former girlfriend. Panelists will discuss the riveting issues that made us addicted to the podcast and brought this American tragedy into our daily conversation. Hosted by YALA, the program includes food and refreshments. 7 p.m. $15. The Beverly Hills Public Library, 444 N. Rexford Drive, Beverly Hills. (323) 761-8000. FRI | JUNE 5

“THE FAREWELL PARTY”

Who knew death could be so funny? In this Israeli film by Sharon Maymom and Tal Granit, which won an Ophir Award for best direction, a group of friends at a Jerusalem retirement home build a machine for self-euthanasia so they can help their terminally ill friend. When rumors of the machine begin to spread, more and more people ask for their help, and the friends find themselves in a dilemma of grave proportions. Screening at the Venice International Film Festival and the Toronto International Film Festival, the movie stars Aliza Rosen, Ilan Dar, Levana Finkelstein, Rafael Tabor and Ze’ev Revach. Various times. $9-$12. Royal, 11523 Santa Monica Blvd., Los Angeles; Town Center 5, 17200 Ventura Blvd., Encino; Playhouse 7, 673 E. Colorado Blvd., Pasadena. (310) 478-1041. Calendar: May 30–June 5 Read More »

In a war against wage theft

“At his day thou shalt give him his hire, neither shall the sun go down upon it, for he is poor and his life depends on it. …” – Deuteronomy 24:15

Last week, Los Angeles’ City Council voted to raise the minimum wage to $15 per hour by 2020. The decision was greeted with tremendous fanfare. A companion vote, arguably of equal importance to low-wage workers, received almost no attention. Alongside the minimum wage vote, the City Council asked the city attorney to draft an ordinance to create an Office of Labor Standards to enforce the new minimum wage and other basic labor standards. 

The ugly truth is that many workers in Los Angles don’t make the minimum wage. In a city unflatteringly dubbed “the wage theft capital of the nation,” an increase in the minimum wage without enforcement would leave behind our city’s most vulnerable and impoverished workers. 

The garment industry, which accounts for 45,000 manufacturing jobs in Los Angeles, is awash in wage theft. The typical garment worker is paid a “piece rate” of a few cents per garment, which almost never amounts to the minimum hourly wage. Bet Tzedek Legal Services, the nonprofit firm where I practice, has represented hundreds of garment workers in wage claims. A recent client reports regularly working 55 hours per week, sewing clothes for many well-known fast-fashion designers, and receiving between $260 and $340 per week. The problem is so pervasive that she is one of several repeat garment worker clients my firm has represented. 

Wherever there is an industry employing low-wage workers, wage theft is often not far behind. It is usually hiding behind layers of subcontracting and in the shadows of the underground economy. For example, two young female janitors came into our office last month. They worked at a local movie theater chain but were paid by an out-of-state subcontractor. They worked more than 50 hours per week for a biweekly “salary” of $650. When one of them complained about their wages, they were quickly replaced. 

These experiences are not the exception. A 2010 UCLA study found that 88 percent of low-wage workers in Los Angles experience a form of wage theft on a weekly basis. Nearly 30 percent of low-wage workers surveyed did not receive the minimum wage. In total, Angelenos lose $26.2 million in wages per week to wage theft. Across every metric, the rate of wage theft in Los Angles was higher than in New York and Chicago. 

Meanwhile, the current enforcement mechanisms and resources are woefully inadequate. The most exploited workers in our local economy are isolated, fearful of retaliation and confronted with significant cultural barriers to asserting their rights. For workers willing to come forward, the state labor commissioner wage claim process takes well over a year and can be futile. Between 2008 and 2011, only 17 percent of those who won their wage claims before the labor commissioner were able to recover any payment whatsoever. Rather than pay owed wages, employers nimbly transfer assets, relocate and create new corporate shells. 

Without outside intervention, industries can quickly slide down a wage-theft rabbit hole. Where bad actors thrive, competition by employers playing by the rules becomes nearly impossible. Indeed, it is hard to imagine how a fast-fashion garment factory paying its workers properly could survive, given the rock-bottom industry standard. It has to be the role of government to ensure a level playing field or labor standards quickly devolve into lofty goals. 

By creating a local wage enforcement office, Los Angeles is joining other progressive cities such as San Francisco, Seattle and Washington, D.C., and that are striving to create that level playing field. San Francisco’s office is often cited as the gold standard. It employs a field enforcement model that cites any violating employer for owed wages to all employees, not just individual complainants. The office also engages in strategic outreach and partnerships with community organizations. As a result, the office actually collects the back wages it assesses. In 2013, it recovered nearly $1.5 million in wages. 

The next few weeks are crucial to the fate of the Los Angles office. The city attorney submitted a draft ordinance to the City Council last week. Parts of the draft, adopting San Francisco’s field enforcement model and fine structure, are encouraging. However, despite a request from the City Council, the draft does not include any wage lien mechanism for owed wages. Nor does it include the criminal misdemeanor provision recommended by advocates. Finally, the license revocation provision is puzzlingly limited to police permits rather than all licenses within the city’s control. 

Any unit created this spring will undoubtedly be underfunded. The City Council itself noted that its proposal funds only five investigators, whereas the San Francisco office has a staff of 25 for a city a quarter the size of Los Angles. This is all the more reason that lawmakers must equip the office with the most effective tools available. 

The minimum wage ordinance has the laudable goal of lifting low-wage working families out of poverty. But those who need it most will not benefit without meaningful enforcement. The City Council cannot solve this problem overnight. But by ensuring that an effective ordinance gets over the finish line, it can make Los Angeles a leader in wage theft reform, not just in wage theft.


Danielle Lang is a staff attorney in Bet Tzedek Legal Services’ Employment Rights Project. The program helps low-wage workers and trafficked laborers who were illegally denied earned wages or suffered illegal retaliation for asserting their rights. Since its founding in 2001, the program has obtained $36 million in judgments on behalf of 5,500 workers.

In a war against wage theft Read More »

How the FIFA corruption scandal could affect Israel

Israelis were expecting some big news to come out of the annual FIFA Congress this week.

But they probably weren’t expecting this.

In a bombshell operation, a Swiss law enforcement team showed up at the Zurich hotel hosting the annual gathering of the international soccer organization — and arrested nine senior officials.

The arrests come after decades of corruption allegations aimed at FIFA. (If you’re unfamiliar, comedian John Oliver’s got you covered.) The arrested officials face charges of taking money in exchange for World Cup hosting bids, as well taking bribes in exchange for media and marketing rights for major international tournaments.

The allegations are damning, but frankly, they couldn’t have come at a better time for Israel. Until Wednesday, much of the coverage of the FIFA Congress surrounded whether delegates would vote tosuspend Israel from world soccer. The Palestinian Football Association is introducing the motion to suspend Israel, accusing it of unjustly restricting Palestinian soccer players’ freedom of movement and claiming that Israel’s West Bank settlement teams violate FIFA rules. Israeli officials have called the effort blatantly political and said that the Palestinians’ complaints all concern Israel’s security forces — not Israel’s soccer teams.

For Israel to be suspended, three quarters of delegates would need to approve the motion. If that were a long shot before, it’s even more unlikely now.

Suspending the Jewish state from international play would have rocked world soccer’s boat, inviting allegations of anti-Semitism and double standards. Israel, to say the least, likely would not have gone quietly into the night.

Now, with FIFA’s boat already rocking, member states will probably be loath to pile one controversy on another. FIFA President Sepp Blatter, already opposed to Israel’s suspension (he met last week with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas) is probably looking to avoid two crises on his hands at once.

Israel can even take comfort in historical precedent. When Netanyahu went to the White House in January 1998 to meet with President Clinton, he reportedly expected a tense meeting about the peace process. But the Monica Lewinsky scandal broke that day, leaving the president preoccupied.

With world soccer preoccupied and the eyes of the world elsewhere, this could be FIFA and Israel’s Monica moment.

How the FIFA corruption scandal could affect Israel Read More »