October 14, 2014

As the University of California, Berkeley celebrates the 50th anniversary of the Free Speech Movement, a long-simmering feud over funding for the Emma Goldman Papers  — an archival project dedicated to the life and work of the iconic Jewish radical and free speech advocate — is coming to a head.

After 34 years of U.C. Berkeley affiliation, and more than $1.2 million of funding spread across the decades, the university has informed the project’s editor and director, Candace Falk, that her employment will terminate at the end of this month due to lack of funding. That decision, which the university’s chancellor has deemed final, could effectively shut down the Emma Goldman Papers Project (EGPP), which has been housed on or near the U.C. Berkeley campus since its inception.

“It feels like the rug is being pulled out from under us,” said Falk, who founded the project in 1980 with a grant from the National Archives. “Just as we are within a year of finishing the last volume of our series on Goldman’s American years, we’re in danger of shutting down.”

Falk said in an Oct. 13 email that if her funding dries up, the archive will have “no roof over our documents, no money for staff.” While Falk has secured private donations to float the project through December, beyond that, the future remains uncertain.

Falk, 66, has dedicated the better part of her adult life to collecting, organizing and publishing Goldman’s letters and writings, as well as trial transcripts and surveillance reports from the repressive era in U.S. history when the Russian-born anarchist was imprisoned in 1917 for speaking out against America’s entry into World War I. In some ways, Falk has come to embody Goldman’s anti-authoritarian spirit, wrangling for decades with university officials over funding for her project.

But despite Falk’s insistence that the EGPP has been given short shrift, university officials argue that funding for the project has, in fact, been generous over the years. It’s Falk’s repeated delays in publishing her four-volume series that have stymied her, they say, not a shortage of funds on the part of the university.

“It has been a major effort and we’ve generously funded it,” said Nils Gilman, associate chancellor and chief of staff to the chancellor. “You give people a certain amount of time to get their projects done, and then you make choices. To continue to fund this is to not fund something else.”

Robert Price, the university’s associate vice chancellor for research, pointed to a 2003 status report prepared for then-chancellor Robert Berdahl, outlining the numerous delays in Falk’s publication schedule. “The Emma Goldman Papers Project has had difficulty meeting the publication deadlines to which it has committed itself in grant applications, publisher’s contracts, and communications with the Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research,” the report read.

Falk attributed those delays to the detailed and painstaking nature of archival work, a revolving door of staff owing to funding difficulties, as well as two bouts with breast cancer. She noted that it took 15 years just to gather the trove of documents on Goldman, which number about 40,000, more than half of which are published on Microfilm.

Falk’s goal now, she said, is to complete the fourth and final volume of her series on Goldman’s American years in time for the 100th anniversary of the U.S. entry into World War I. She also hopes to digitize the archive in order to make it accessible to scholars and students; to that end, the EGPP has been awarded a $15,000 grant from the New York-based Lucius N. Littauer Foundation.

Until two years ago, the project received funding from the National Archives to the tune of about $100,000 annually. U.C. Berkeley funding began in 1988 and ended in 2003, after being extended under a previous vice chancellor. The EGPP has also received intermittent funding from the National Endowment for the Humanities.

These days, Falk said, she has no reliable source of funding, and while she has had success raising monies from private donors, those contributions have not been enough to cover her annual costs, which total $250,000.

According to Falk, the EGPP pays its own $1,700 monthly rent plus utilities for an office adjacent to the campus, and currently employs one full-time employee and two three-quarter-time employees.

Like Goldman, who was deported to Russia in 1919, Falk is mistrustful of authority and believes that the reasons for her funding woes are political in nature. She points to the Mark Twain Papers and Project, which is housed at U.C. Berkeley’s Bancroft Library and has its general editor’s salary paid by the university, as evidence of a double standard. “They have embraced that project, but they have not done so with the Emma Goldman Papers,” Falk said of the university, adding, “I think there’s a fear of a woman anarchist immigrant.”

Victor Fischer, associate editor of the Mark Twain Papers and Project, said that he admired Falk’s commitment, and that he was “horrified” by the funding difficulties she has faced. Asked what he saw as the reason for the funding discrepancy between the two projects, Fischer said: “The obvious one is that Emma Goldman is a Russian Jewish anarchist and her politics don’t necessarily meet with everybody’s politics. I can’t say for sure that’s why, but for some reason, Mark Twain is a figure who has been embraced by everybody no matter what their politics.”

University officials staunchly deny Falk’s claim that her subject’s radical politics played any part in the decision to end funding for the archival project. “To say that after decades of funding, she’s a victim of political discrimination strikes me as peculiar,” Gilman, the associate chancellor, said of Falk. “If we were politically discriminatory, funding would have been cut a long time ago.”

Nobody doubts the value of the EGPP, including Gilman, who said that as a historian and a former student at U.C. Berkeley, he had friends who had passed through its doors. Indeed hundreds of university research associates have worked at the EGPP, and in many cases, been launched into successful academic careers as a result of their involvement. “It’s been a great way to bring people into the process of archival management,” Gilman said.

Other repositories of Goldman’s papers can be found — in Amsterdam, for example, at the International Institute of Social History, or online at the Jewish Women’s Archive digital archive. But the EGPP is the most comprehensive, organized collection of Goldman-related materials in the world and integrates copies of smaller private and university collections. Its roughly 40,000 documents include Goldman-related newspaper coverage, legal documents, government surveillance records and third-party letters between Goldman’s friends and associates regarding her political activities.

Even a necklace of Goldman’s, donated by a relative in New York, is housed at the archive. Last summer, when Falk was awarded the 2014 Philip M. Hamer–Elizabeth Hamer Kegan Award by the Society of American Archivists, she wore it to the awards ceremony in Washington D.C.

“The collection is unparalleled in terms of the materials it pulls together,” said Judith Rosenbaum, the executive director of the Jewish Women’s Archive.

Steven Zipperstein, Daniel E. Koshland Professor in Jewish Culture and History at Stanford University, who brought Falk’s publication series to Stanford University Press, also lauded the work of the EGPP. “I don’t know of any other collection quite like it in its comprehensiveness, or in its capacity to draw on such a wide range of material to understand not only Emma Goldman’s personal and political life, but the world around her,” Zipperstein said.

Falk, who recently sent out an emergency fundraising letter to supporters and colleagues, said that she is forging ahead, and that the university can still accept private donations, as they have for other “imperiled projects.”

“I’ve been working on this project for 34 years,” Falk said. “I’m determined to finish.”