fbpx

August 24, 2014

Sunday Reads: On General Sherman & the IDF, Saudi Arabia’s influence on ISIS, America’s ‘dirty wars’

US

According to Russell Crandall, America has been fighting 'dirty wars' since its inception –

America’s self-identity is that we are a reluctant nation when it comes to starting wars, but when forced we fight total wars regularly and successfully—and sometimes even leave behind the defeated societies better than they had been before… Yet despite our desire to fight the good fight against a foe who will play by our rules, America’s history is overwhelmingly one of fighting opaque and incomplete dirty wars—from the American Revolution through Afghanistan.

Victor Davis Hanson sees a resemblence between the war tactics of a controversial figure in American history and those used by the IDF in Gaza –

Sherman’s rhetoric was bellicose, indeed uncouth — even as he avoided killing as many southerners as he could. He left civilians as mad at their own leaders as at him. For all that and more, he remains a “terrorist,” while the bloodbaths at Cold Harbor and the Crater are not considered barbaric — and just as the world hates what the IDF did in Gaza far more than the abject butchery of the Islamic State, which at the same time was spreading savagery throughout Syria and Iraq, or than the Russians’ indiscriminate killing in Ukraine, or than what passes for an average day in the Congo.

Israel

Michael Eisenstadt and Rob Satloff summarize the conclusions of a discussion held by military experts on the possibility of disarming Hamas and creating a long-term cease fire –

Constraining the ability of Hamas et al. to fire rockets at Israel is therefore key to preventing another conflict that could cost numerous civilian lives and lay waste to infrastructure and lodging built with billions of dollars in reconstruction assistance. For the first time, key international actors — including the U.S. government and the European Union — are on record calling for the disarmament of Gaza as an essential precondition for averting another military confrontation and permitting the reconstruction of civilian infrastructure.

Or Kashti writes about a new anthropological study which examines the rising levels of racism among Israeli teens –

“For me, personally, Arabs are something I can’t look at and can’t stand,” a 10th-grade girl from a high school in the central part of the country says in abominable Hebrew. “I am tremendously racist. I come from a racist home. If I get the chance in the army to shoot one of them, I won’t think twice. I’m ready to kill someone with my hands, and it’s an Arab. In my education I learned that … their education is to be terrorists, and there is no belief in them. I live in an area of Arabs, and every day I see these Ishmaelites, who pass by the [bus] station and whistle. I wish them death.”

Middle East

According to Tom Holland, ISIS is destroying the biggest melting pot in history

 As the fighters of the Islamic State drive from village to captured village in their looted humvees, they criss-cross what in ancient times was a veritable womb of gods. For millennia, the Fertile Crescent teemed with a bewildering variety of cults and religions. Back in the 3rd Christian century, a philosopher by the name of Bardaisan was so overwhelmed by the sheer array of beliefs to be found in Mesopotamia that he invoked it to disprove the doctrines of astrology. ‘It is not the stars that make people behave the way do but rather the diversity of their customs.’

Ed Hussein believes that the ISIS crisis would not have occurred without Saudi Arabia's long term support for Salafi hatred –

Unlike a majority of Sunnis, Salafis are evangelicals who wish to convert Muslims and others to their “purer” form of Islam — unpolluted, as they see it, by modernity. In this effort, they have been lavishly supported by the Saudi government, which has appointed emissaries to its embassies in Muslim countries who proselytize for Salafism. The kingdom also grants compliant imams V.I.P. access for the annual hajj, and bankrolls ultraconservative Islamic organizations like the Muslim World League and World Assembly of Muslim Youth.

Jewish World

James Kirchick writes an interesting piece on a heated Israel debate taking place in NY’s premier LGBT synagogue –

Listening to the complaints of some present and former congregants about Kleinbaum, the criticisms sounds familiar. “It’s about pushing a very particular form of political views on congregants and then choosing good, fair and honest people who are Jewishly educated and thoughtful about Israel and accusing them of being McCarthyites,” the former congregant, who has worked for prominent Jewish organizations, complained to me. It is the sort of grumbling that many Jews have about their rabbi’s politics (whether too right or too left), merely transposed onto a gay synagogue, with all of the pre-existing drama between lesbians and gay men. Appropriately, an old Jewish joke comes to mind: A Jew is found shipwrecked on a desert island. Over time, he built two synagogues for himself: The first in which he prayed, the second he refused to step foot in, even if you paid him. What the crisis at Congregation Beit Simchat Torah really shows is that gay Jews now have the luxury to kvetch about the same things as everyone else.

Does ‘Love thy neighbors as yourself’ apply to gentiles? Richard Elliott Friedman offers some interesting musings on the subject –

When the text already directs every Israelite to love aliens as oneself, what would be the point of saying to love only Israelites—in the very same chapter! Now my friend Jack Milgrom, of blessed memory, wrote that it is precisely because the love of the alien is specifically mentioned there that love of “neighbor” must mean only a fellow Israelite.

Sunday Reads: On General Sherman & the IDF, Saudi Arabia’s influence on ISIS, America’s ‘dirty wars’ Read More »

Targeted Killing and International Law – An Israeli Expert Speaks

This morning (August 24) I listened to the TLV1 Podcast of “So Much to Say” that featured an interview conducted by host Hillel L. Cohen of Daniel Reyzner, an attorney, international law expert, and former head of the International Law Department of the IDF. The subject was Israel’s targeted killing of the three Hamas leaders this past week and possibly the killing of Muhammad Deif, among the very top Hamas Generals. Cohen wanted Reyzner to explain the differences between “assassinations” and “targeted killings” and the principle of proportionality that results in civilian casualties.

Reyzner said that “assassination” is a term used to denote an unlawful killing by a private individual. “Targeted killing,” however, is very different and is what America, Great Britain and Israel have used since 9/11 and the 2nd Intifada. This is more than a semantic issue, because Israel's enemies would like to delegitimize Israel’s targeting of Hamas militant leaders by calling it “assassination.”

Until fifteen years ago, the logic of law enforcement in most of the western world was that the role of a representative of a government (the police, a soldier, etc.) was to arrest individuals who were allegedly guilty of a crime or who were about to commit a crime and bring them to justice. However, this traditional standard of law enforcement breaks down concerning groups shooting rockets and missiles and making suicide attacks from a neighboring country. Israel has no means or ability to arrest and prosecute such individuals.

Since the 2nd Intifada and 9/11, terrorism is understood by most western nations as “warfare,” and therefore, fighting terrorism falls under the laws of war.

Once one accepts this logic, the next step is to distinguish between combatants and civilians. In Gaza, for example, since there is no opportunity to arrest combatants, it is lawful for Israel to target militants and kill high-ranking Hamas officials.

Israel, more than most nations, has much experience in this kind of warfare, according to Reyzner, and has developed clear standards by which it may act against enemy combatants. The original set of standards was developed in 2000 after the 2nd Intifada and had five conditions. A later Israel High Court decision taken in 2005-6 under former Chief Justice Aharon Barak approved those standards. The five include:

1. That credible evidence must be shown that individuals targeted are centrally involved in attacking Israel;

2. That legitimate areas for such attack are Gaza and some (but not all) places in the West Bank;

3. That no approval for attacks will be given to any commander operating in an area controlled by Israel (i.e. Area C in which Israel has security responsibility) where it is possible to seek out, arrest and bring suspects to justice;

4. That when Israel attacks individuals, per the above conditions, it must comply with the principle of proportionality in times of war. This means that the commander must balance between the anticipated military advantage of the attack and the resulting danger, death of innocent civilians, and damage to property that is likely to occur. The complicating fact that Hamas deliberately embeds itself in civilian neighborhoods, homes, apartment buildings, schools, hospitals, clinics, mosques, and UN centers, has complicated Israeli actions severely. The risk, of course, is that if an Israeli commander violates any of these standards, he may become guilty of a war crime. The problem is that such charges are usually brought long after the war has ceased by people sitting in committees under the protection of international courts and the Hague, who have never fought in a war themselves and do not understand the pressures in battle, and who may not have the relevant expertise in international laws of warfare (as is the case with the recently established UN commission to investigate Israeli war crimes – no mention of Hamas is in its mandate!). The Israeli commander in the field, Reyzner explained, is given latitude to make decisions in real time with the best information he/she has. On the one hand, this flexibility gives the commander the freedom to make the right decision, but on the other it increases risk that someone else will say he made the wrong decision. When evaluating Israel, it takes the most extreme precautionary measures than any other western country;

5. This was a procedural item requiring all the first four standards to be fulfilled.

I found this interview particularly enlightening and recommend your listening to it.

Targeted Killing and International Law – An Israeli Expert Speaks Read More »

Netanyahu: ‘No immunity’ for those who fire at Israel

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned that any building from which Hamas carries out terrorist activities is a target for Israel.

Netanyahu, speaking at the beginning of the weekly Cabinet meeting on Sunday morning, said the Gaza operation will continue “until its goals are achieved.” As he did earlier this month, the Israeli leader again equated Hamas to the jihadist group ISIS.

He called on the residents of Gaza “to immediately evacuate any building from which Hamas is carrying out terrorist activity. Any such place is a target for us.

“In recent days we have proven there is no immunity for those who fire at Israel’s citizens,” Netanyahu said. “This is true in all sectors and regarding all borders.”

Several hours earlier, Israel had leveled a 12-story apartment building with an airstrike that its military said housed Hamas operations.

Addressing directly the Israeli citizens living in areas on the border with Gaza, Netanyahu said, “I appreciate your resilience. I appreciate your suffering and I share your pain.” He promised that the government would approve a package of assistance for southern Israeli communities for during and after the operation.

Netanyahu also said, “Hamas is ISIS and ISIS is Hamas. They act in the same way. They are branches of the same poisonous tree. They are two extremist Islamic terrorist movements that abduct and murder innocents, that execute their own people, that shrink at nothing including the willful murder of children.”

The Gaza operation could extend into the start of the school year, the prime minister said.

Netanyahu: ‘No immunity’ for those who fire at Israel Read More »

Iran says it shot down Israeli drone near Natanz nuclear facility

 Iran claimed that it shot down an Israeli drone near its Natanz uranium enrichment facility.

The drone was targeted by a ground-to-air missile before it entered the site, Iran’s state news agency ISNA reported Sunday.

Natanz, Iran’s main uranium enrichment site with more than 10,000 centrifuges, is located southeast of Tehran.

“This act demonstrates a new adventurism by the Zionist regime,” Iran’s Revolutionary Guard said in a statement on its official website, the AFP news agency reported. “The Revolutionary Guard and the other armed forces reserve the right to respond to this act.”

Israel has not commented on the statement.

Iran and the major powers, led by the United States, agreed in July to extend the talks on Iran’s nuclear program for another four months, citing progress in a number of areas. Iran has said it does not want to reduce its number of its centrifuges, and the world powers will not accept Iran maintaining its current capacity for uranium enrichment.

An interim deal that facilitated the talks in January rolled back some sanctions placed on Iran in exchange for reducing some of its nuclear capability.

Iran says it shot down Israeli drone near Natanz nuclear facility Read More »

Hollywood Zionists are alive and well

In late July, when Israel and Gaza were in the throes of violent conflict, and international condemnation of Israeli military behavior had reached fever pitch, only a token few in the Hollywood community had anything to say about it.

But one month later, that appears to have changed.

Over the weekend, the anti-boycott group Creative Community for Peace released a poetic letter condemning Hamas with some 200 Hollywood “heavyweights” affixing their signatures: Old faithfuls like talk show host Bill Maher, media mogul Haim Saban, and studio executives Amy Pascal and Nina Tassler offered their support, along with a multitude of new voices including writer Aaron Sorkin and actors Seth Rogen, Tony Goldwyn and Minnie Driver (the DreamWorks trifecta known as Spielberg, Katzenberg and Geffen, however, are notably absent). 

“We, the undersigned, are saddened by the devastating loss of life endured by Israelis and Palestinians in Gaza,” the letter begins. But, “[w]hile we stand firm in our commitment to peace and justice, we must also stand firm against ideologies of hatred and genocide which are reflected in Hamas' charter…which reads, “There is a Jew hiding behind me, come on and kill him!”

In what appears to be the largest collection of Hollywood names to make a public statement regarding Israel in years, the letter only uses the word “Israeli” once. Instead, it offers a concise excoriation of Hamas – albeit, in cutesy poetic verse:

Hospitals are for healing, not for hiding weapons. Schools are for learning, not for launching missiles. Children are our hope, not our human shields.

The uncontroversial ad, which will run in industry trade publications Billboard, Variety and The Hollywood Reporter beginning Aug. 23, follows a similar denunciation authored by the Anti-Defamation League and published in The Jewish Journal last week. While that letter had only a symbolic 18 signatories, and included some crossover names like Saban, Pascal, Relativity Media CEO Ryan Kavanaugh and talent manager Danny Sussman — each of whom has an established and enduring history of supporting the Jewish State — the message was mainly the same: Civilian casualties, sad; Hamas, bad.  I’m sure there are plenty of Palestinians who would sign that letter, too.

So what is the point of this recent literary campaign? Now that diplomacy appears to be inching Israel and Gaza out of full scale war, who, exactly, are these letters addressed to? And what will they accomplish?

With ad placement in the Hollywood trades, there is a clear message to the media: No matter how biased some reporting, a big swath of Hollywood has Israel’s back (and they tell the stories people tend to remember).

But even louder than that is Hollywood’s message to itself: even if some prefer not to meddle in the details, the entertainment industry has a bottom line; and, at least for now, it falls on Israel’s side of the border. Days after the CCFP letter was published, actor Seth Rogen tweeted: “A lot of people are using their disdain for Israel's army's tactics as an excuse to get some truly remarkable anti-Semitism off their chests.”

 

 

Whether Hollywood will ultimately be able to reconcile its liberalism and Zionism (also a challenge for large swaths of American Jewry) is a fair question, especially in the face of increasing polarization between personal politics and passion for Israel. A recent New York Times op-ed by Antony Lerman, former director of the Institute for Jewish Policy Research, claimed these values may be irretrievably at odds.

These letters, it seems, serve as reassurance to the doubters and the challengers  — such as Javier Bardem, Penelope Cruz and even Lerman — that Hollywood Zionism is alive and well. And that even when the industry is silent, it’s not stupid. No amount of reporting bias is going to change the fact on the ground: Israel wishes (though doesn’t always actively try) to co-exist with a peaceful neighbor, and Hamas is a bloodthirsty Islamist extremist group, bent on destruction.

And yet, while the pledge of support from Hollywood is appreciated and admired, these confident letters should not be confused with courage. From the peaceful remove of (Jewish) privilege in Los Angeles, it asks little of one's conscience to sign a letter with 200 colleagues. A more admirable act was when Relativity Media CEO Ryan Kavanaugh spoke out of turn, publishing his own passionate remarks about Israel, unprodded. Where was everybody else when missiles were raining down from the sky?  

Even so, it's comforting to know that at least 200 Hollywood leaders care about Israel's welfare. But the Zionist hero of the summer is Kavanaugh, grandchild of Holocaust survivors, who didn’t require groupthink to use his mind.

Hollywood Zionists are alive and well Read More »