fbpx

January 8, 2014

At Brookline school, students search for missing classmate

At the Maimonides School in Brookline, Mass., this morning, it was all hands on deck as students and faculty mobilized to locate one of their own: Caleb Jacoby, 16, an 11th-grader and the son of Boston Globe columnist Jeff Jacoby who has been missing since Monday afternoon.

At the school’s computer lab, kids were working social media, spreading Caleb’s photo around the Internet. The lunch room had turned into a gathering spot for search volunteers, serving up trays of bagels and urns of coffee. About 200 volunteers are participating in the search, which has extended into Boston.

“The school will continue to engage all of its resources to aid Caleb’s parents and the Brookline Police,” Head of School Naty Katz said in a statement. “Our entire school community is praying for Caleb’s safe return and we are deeply appreciative of the outpouring of support.”

After morning prayers, Rabbi Mordechai Soskil, the middle and upper school’s Judaic studies principal, acknowledged the difficulty of the day.

“We are here supporting the 340 kids that are here today,” Soskil said. “For the vast majority, it means going to class. The best thing to do for vast majority is to let them know that life is unpredictable. For a handful of kids, mostly 11th graders, the best thing is to give then an outlet. We are telling kids everyone here cares about them and thinks about them. We are concerned about Caleb, but there’s the same level of concern for everyone here.”

On Wednesday, Brookline Police Captain Thomas Keaveney told MassLive.com that law enforcement was “leaning more toward” treating the case as a runaway, rather than an abduction.

One of Caleb’s classmates, Adele Buff, was heading up the social media effort. Mid-morning, there were 15 kids typing away at computers and using cell phones to spread the word.

“We are contacting as many people as we can, at colleges, YMCAs and organizations, to let them know about Caleb and to contact us or the Brookline police,” Buff said. “We created a blog. We are getting a lot of feedback from people who want to help spread the word. He’s a quite, good kid.”

At Brookline school, students search for missing classmate Read More »

AEPi becomes member of Conference of Presidents

The Jewish fraternity Alpha Epsilon Pi has become a member of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations.

AEPi is the first college student organization to be a full member of the conference, an umbrella organization for more than 50 U.S. Jewish groups that focuses primarily on promoting pro-Israel positions. Hillel: The Foundation for Jewish Campus Life is an adjunct member of the conference.

The members’ vote to admit AEPi came after a unanimous recommendation by the Presidents Conference membership committee.

“This is recognition by the Conference member organizations of the need to engage future leaders of our community and to give them a voice in our deliberations,” Presidents Conference Chairman Robert Sugarman and CEO Malcolm Hoenlein said in a statement on Tuesday.

“AEPi is a remarkable organization with affiliates on campuses across the country and provides an array of educational and advocacy training programs. We have seen first-hand not only the quality of the members but also their commitment to promoting Jewish involvement and Israel on campus.”

Last August, AEPi made Hoenlein a fraternity brother at AEPi’s 100th anniversary dinner at the Waldorf Astoria Hotel in New York. The ceremony did not include prolonged hazing.

On Monday, AEPi’s international president, Elan Carr, and executive director, Andrew Borans, hailed the fraternity’s admission to the conference as a step toward making “an even greater impact on Jewish identity, Jewish leadership and Israel advocacy.”

“AEPi’s proven track record of Jewish leadership, philanthropy, and unequivocal support for the State of Israel will be an important asset for the Conference,” they said.

The Conference of Presidents has come under fire on occasion from some of its own members for promoting overly hawkish views on Israel-related issues or taking positions that were not voted on by members.

The most recent such complaint came on Dec. 23, when Americans for Peace Now complained that a statement welcoming the U.S. Senate’s new Iran sanctions bill did not represent Presidents Conference consensus and should not have been sent out in the name of members.

“Reacting to a piece of legislation that is so controversial, concerning an issue that is so delicate, requires some internal process, some soliciting of feedback from CoP member organizations,” Americans for Peace Now wrote in a letter to Hoenlein and Sugarman, using shorthand for the Conference of Presidents. “To the best of our knowledge, there was no such process.”

Hoenlein did not return a call from JTA seeking comment.

J Street, a left-wing pro-Israel advocacy organization, has its own membership application pending before the Presidents Conference, according to Alan Elsner, J Street’s vice president for communications.

J Street submitted its application last summer, Elsner said, not long after the group passed its five-year anniversary — a requisite for Presidents Conference members. Elsner said the conference responded by asking J Street to provide certain clarifications.

AEPi becomes member of Conference of Presidents Read More »

Thousands of African migrants protest outside Israeli parliament

More than 10,000 African migrants demonstrated outside Israel's parliament on Wednesday, extending protests into a fourth consecutive day in a quest for recognition as refugees and freedom to work legally without fear of incarceration.

Their presence in a Jewish state that took in survivors of the Nazi Holocaust of World War Two has stoked an emotional political debate over whether they should be allowed to stay as a humane gesture.

“I want to say to them that they should not fear us, we are human beings too,” a tall, slim 25-year-old man from Eritrea, who gave his name only as Mulugieta, told Reuters.

Some 60,000 migrants, largely from Eritrea and Sudan, have entered Israel without authorization across a once-porous border with Egypt since 2006. Many hope for asylum and say they cannot return home without risking their lives.

Israel says most are illegal job-seekers. It passed a law three weeks ago allowing for indefinite detention of migrants without valid visas while it pursues efforts to persuade them to leave or enlist other countries to take them in.

Mulugieta said he fled Eritrea six years ago, fearing that his criticism of its rulers had put him in danger.

“We asked for shelter, we do not deserve jail,” read one of many large banners in a park opposite the Israeli Knesset as the crowd demonstrated against Israel's refusal to grant them refugee status.

“Being black is not a crime,” another sign said.

Many of the migrants live in impoverished neighborhoods of Tel Aviv, Israel's commercial centre, and work as cleaners and dish-washers. They have gone on strike at restaurants as part of a protest campaign that included a large demonstration in the Mediterranean seaside city on Sunday.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said this week he views the African influx – since stemmed by an Israeli fence along the Egyptian frontier – as a threat to Israel's Jewish social fabric.

Miri Regev, a member of Netanyahu's right-wing Likud party, said it was time to send the migrants, whom she dubbed “infiltrators”, away.

“Stop being bleeding-hearts,” Regev said on Israel Radio, referring to Israeli activists seeking to help the Africans.

FOUR DAYS OF PROTESTS

It was the fourth straight day of protests by the migrants, who on Monday marched to foreign embassies in Tel Aviv to appeal for international intervention.

Protester Mulugieta said: “Everyone has come across the border, we escaped the war but they fear us (here) … we are not the enemy of the Israeli public.”

Dozens of migrants have been summoned for detention at a specially-built centre in Israel's Negev desert, where they are allowed to leave for brief periods during the day but must return at nightfall, activists said.

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees has said Israel's detention policy towards the migrants caused “hardship and suffering” and was not in line with a 1951 world treaty on the treatment of refugees.

Outside parliament, several left-wing legislators addressed the crowd. Erel Margalit of the opposition Labour Party apologized to the protesters after Parliament Speaker Yuli Edelstein refused to allow a delegation in to meet lawmakers.

David Grossman, a writer identified with the Israeli left-wing, told the protesters that the Jewish state's treatment of the migrants was shameful.

“I look at you now … I feel embarrassed and ashamed,” Grossman said in English. “Israel has not created this problem, but there is a problem now (and) we have to struggle with it and to solve it in the most humane way.”

Editing by Jeffrey Heller and Mark Heinrich

Thousands of African migrants protest outside Israeli parliament Read More »

Refugee teens in Israel win races but not awards

On a chilly night in December, up a grassy slope overlooking the all-weather track at Ironi Tet High School in southeast Tel Aviv, a few dozen teens — hailing from about 10 different countries — raced one another to the top of the hill.

Yalla, Rahel!” one girl shouted from the sidelines, egging on the runner in first place. Rahel Gebretzadik, a petite 15-year-old wearing a wild ponytail and long sleeves under her T-shirt to cut the chill, is a star member of a local track and field club team named the South Tel Aviv Alleys. She nails this drill at practice a few times each week.

“Rahel is killing all of the boys,” said team manager and coach Rotem Genossar, out of breath as he watched her pull ahead. The teen had just beat him, too, in an uphill sprint.

“I don’t refer to her as a girl — she’s in the boy group,” he added.

Yet, although Gebretzadik is the speediest long-distance runner under age 19 in Israel, she has never been allowed to stand on a podium at a national competition.

Three years ago, when she was 12, Gebretzadik and her family fled Eritrea to escape religious persecution (they’re Protestant) and trekked across northern Africa and the Sinai Desert to Israel. The family paid Bedouins to taxi them part of the way, but for the on-foot portion of the journey, Gebretzadik carried her little sister on her back. Once inside Israel, the family spent three weeks at the massive Saharonim desert prison for “illegal infiltrators” in Israel’s desolate south before being released in Tel Aviv.

For this reason, Gebretzadik is barred from winning any of her track and field events at the national level.

The Israeli Athletic Association’s (IAA) policy is that in order to officially place in a competition, athletes must hold an Israeli ID. Non-citizens “can race, but they cannot win,” IAA General Secretary Jack Cohen said in a brief phone interview.

Now that her family has settled in South Tel Aviv alongside tens of thousands of fellow Eritrean and Sudanese asylum seekers, Gebretzadik is one of about 50 high-schoolers running for the South Tel Aviv Alleys — approximately 70 percent of whom are not allowed to win any races because their parents came to Israel seeking either asylum or work and have no path to citizenship because they aren’t Jewish.

Gebretzadik has been denied a spot on the podium six times since May. And the team’s long-distance coach, Yuval Carmi, said six to eight of her fast-improving teammates are also about to learn how that feels: “They’ll have to face it this season because they’ll be in very good shape. She is the best, so she faced it first.”

Israel’s continued imprisonment of thousands of African men without a trial, and rejection of their families’ applications for asylum, has reached a boiling point already this year. Rallies with turnouts in the tens of thousands are currently raging across Tel Aviv. But meanwhile, kids stuck in the system are facing smaller humiliations that can feel just as huge.

Most recently, at a cross-country championship meet in the Tel Aviv suburb of Holon, Gebretzadik had her first-place win in the three kilometers (just under two miles) pulled out from under her.

“When they didn’t call her name, I felt uncomfortable,” said teammate Catherine Couturiaux, an 18-year-old legal immigrant from Spain. “It was an injustice, what they did.”

Rosefynn Boado, 15, a sprinter and hurdler who was born in Israel (and therefore does hold an Israeli ID) to a mother from the Philippines and a father from Ghana, agreed. “It’s not fair,” she said. “It made me really sad.” 

Adding to the embarrassment, long-distance coach Carmi said that event managers then announced to the whole crowd: “By the way, another girl, Rahel, came in first, but she doesn’t have Israeli citizenship.”

In September, Gebretzadik’s story was featured on Ynet.com, Israel’s online news source of record. The comment section became a warring ground between Israel’s right and left, transcending the topic of a teenage girl wronged to the greater refugee situation in Tel Aviv. 

“You snuck in illegally? Deport, end of story,” one commenter wrote in Hebrew. “I recommend you run all the way back to Egypt, and Eritrea,” wrote another.

Gebretzadik couldn’t help but peek at the comments. “They really got her down,” said Couturiaux. “But we told her, ‘It doesn’t matter what they say.’ ”

After practice one night in December, Gebretzadik changed into a gold tracksuit she brought with her from Eritrea and shared a hand of bananas with some other girls on the team. She blushed at questions about the hard crossing from Eritrea, and about the discrimination she now faces in Israel.

“Of course it’s discouraging,” she said. “But I’ve gotten used to it.”

Her teammates, many of whom also endured rough trips to Israel, giggled with her through the interview. “It was so hard; I cried,” said Samia Mohammad of her family’s trip, smiling wide and swooping her arm over a shorter teammate. After escaping war-torn Darfur, Sudan, she remembers “jumping over the rocks” as she hiked across the desert. (Like the vast majority of African asylum seekers in the same situation, Mohammad’s family was not granted refugee status in Israel. So if Samia or her brother Ramzi place gold, silver or bronze in any events this season, the IAA will deny their wins.) 

Team practices have become as much a social gathering and support system as a training ground. “Especially for the girls, the social reasons for running become greater than the athletic ones,” team manager Genossar said.

They’re a tight bunch, even once practice lets out. Late one December night, a group of the girls crowded onto bus No. 104 for the trip back home to South Tel Aviv, sharing ear buds and alternating fluidly between Hebrew and Arabic.

Their team name, the South Tel Aviv Alleys, shows they are “an urban team from the neighborhood — running in the streets, not in the fields,” Genossar said.

The 30-year-old Israeli coach is also a civics teacher at the Bialik-Rogozin School in South Tel Aviv, and his team draws most of its talent from the school’s student body — a melting pot of Muslims, Christians and Jews from roughly 50 countries. If the school sounds familiar, that’s because Bialik-Rogozin was the star of “Strangers No More,” a film by non-Israelis that won the Oscar for best short documentary in 2011.

In “Strangers No More,” directors Karen Goodman and Kirk Simon tracked the educational progress of a handful of refugee and migrant children at the school — some of whom had never before seen the inside of a classroom — as they learned to read and write, all the while fearing deportation.

The South Tel Aviv Alleys, too, embody the school’s remarkable yet effortless diversity. Ever since the team was founded in October 2012 and added to the nation’s official club roster in 2013, it has grown into a pretty popular place to be: “Our goal was originally 15 kids,” said Genossar. Now that they’ve surpassed 50, they’re in desperate need of additional funding to keep the team alive.

And as the Alleys have expanded their roster, their presence at IAA meets — and with it, their ban from the podium — has become glaring.

IAA spokesman Oren Bukstein explained that although it’s hard to see disappointment on any kid’s face, “We have a saying in Hebrew: First of all, look at your own kids. You cannot hurt the Israeli kids because of some compassion.”

He said that the citizenship mandate was created in part to discourage foreign athletes from competing in Israel solely for the prize money, then skipping town.

However, the team’s Israeli coaches are angry that the IAA refuses to make a distinction between professional sports tourists and kids who had no option but to come to Israel and have since made it their home.

“They’re already here — they live here, and they speak Hebrew,” Genossar said. “People who grew up here are treated as complete foreigners, as if they got off the plane to pick up the prize.”

The Alleys and their supporters are asking IAA board members to consider making non-citizens who at least have residency papers eligible to win events.

So far, the board has remained firm on the distinction. At press time, only one of the 13 board members had responded to requests for comment on their reasoning, and that one deflected the request to IAA management. But the IAA’s spokesman seemed optimistic that with some public pressure, board members could have a change of heart. “I think it depends on somebody to wake up the issue,” he said.

Gebretzadik, too, has hope. “I believe the rule will change,” she said confidently through a mouthful of banana after practice.

Proponents of overturning the Israeli ID requirement see the change not only as a means of leveling the playing field for undocumented kids like Gebretzadik but as an opportunity to take Israeli sports to the next level.

“The most important thing is that, individually, they are empowered,” Genossar said. “But they can also make a difference in Israel, because they are so talented, and [Israeli] track and field is not in the best position.

“If the IAA will treat them right,” he said, “everybody can benefit.”


To donate to the South Tel Aviv Alleys and help keep the team running, contact team founder Shirith Kasher at skasher@brack-capital.com.

Refugee teens in Israel win races but not awards Read More »

UCLA’s further deterioration

The intellectual and moral decline of American universities in the last 40 years is one of the saddest chapters in modern American history. 

Take UCLA, long renowned for its excellence in the humanities as well as in the natural sciences (which do remain largely excellent).

As reported in the Wall Street Journal by Heather MacDonald on Jan. 3: 

“The school’s English department was one of the last champions of the historically informed study of great literature, uncorrupted by an ideological overlay. Precisely for that reason, it was the most popular English major in the country, enrolling a whopping 1,400 undergraduates. … Until 2011, students majoring in English at UCLA had to take one course in Chaucer, two in Shakespeare, and one in Milton — the cornerstones of English literature.”

What happened in 2011?

“Following a revolt of the junior faculty …  it was announced that Shakespeare was part of the ‘Empire,’ [and] UCLA junked these individual author requirements.”

In other words, as of two years ago, in order to obtain a degree in English at UCLA, a student does not have to take a single course in Chaucer, Milton or even Shakespeare.

But that doesn’t mean that there are no longer any required courses for a degree in English. There are. Instead of the aforementioned three courses, one is now obligated to take three other courses:

“All English majors take a total of three courses in the following four areas: Gender, Race, Ethnicity, Disability and Sexuality Studies; Imperial, Transnational and Postcolonial Studies; genre studies, interdisciplinary studies, and critical theory; or creative writing.”

Please read that list again. What does any of them have to do with getting a degree in English? 

The answer is, of course, nothing. Except for “creative writing,” every one of them is a course in political indoctrination.

Why has this happened?

Because at most American universities, few professors in the humanities teach that there is excellence, beauty or greatness in literature or the arts. Instead there is:

a) A belief that everything is subjective to the individual. I like comic books; you like Shakespeare. Neither is better nor worse. I like rap; you like Beethoven. Neither is better nor worse. It is narcissism masquerading as education.

b) Group affirmation. The purpose of the humanities is to make women, gays, blacks, Latinos and all other minorities feel affirmed, and feel victimized by rich, white, heterosexual males.

c) The deconstructionist view that all of art, music and literature is merely a product of race, gender and class. Thus, one no longer asks, “What does ‘Hamlet’ have to say about the human condition?” Rather, one asks, “What did Shakespeare have to say from his White European Christian Male perspective?”

d) A substitution of indoctrination for education. Most university classes in the humanities are dedicated to inculcating left-wing values in students. These include the race-gender-class prism.

This was well illustrated just this past Sunday, when C-SPAN’s “Book TV” featured a University of Washington “professor of social justice and political science” named Christopher Parker. 

After his lecture at a college in Maine, a listener made a comment about the Constitution.

 “Who wrote the Constitution?” the professor responded.

He then answered his own question:

“Wealthy white men.”

It took the professor three words to express exactly how the university had indoctrinated him to look at life — through race (“white”), gender (“men”) and class (“wealthy”). For him, the Constitution is meaningless at best and offensive at worst to non-whites, to women or to the non-affluent.

The professor’s very title, “professor of social justice” is a giveaway as to the University of Washington’s intention of indoctrinating rather than educating, just as a “professor of gun rights” would obviously intend to advocate a right-wing or libertarian position rather than merely educate.

And in his prefatory remarks, professor Parker warned the college audience that in his talk he would periodically “drop the f-bomb.” Acceptance of profanity in public is another part of the left’s deconstruction of culture described above. Since there is no such thing as beauty, let alone the holy, the f-word is no different from any another.

Although the University of California has lost more than a billion dollars in state funding since 2007, it has spent tens of millions of dollars on administrators who teach nothing. They are only there to further move the university system to the left — for example, the new quarter-of-a-million-dollar position at UCLA: vice chancellor for equity, diversity and inclusion.

Had there been such a position when UCLA was founded, there would never have been an English department requirement of Shakespeare, Milton and Chaucer. Each one was, after all, a white male. And wealthy, too.


Dennis Prager is a nationally syndicated radio talk-show host (AM 870 in Los Angeles) and founder of PragerUniversity.com. His latest book is the New York Times best seller “Still the Best Hope: Why the World Needs American Values to Triumph” (HarperCollins, 2012).

UCLA’s further deterioration Read More »

Calendar: January 11-17

SAT | JAN 11

CINDY CHUPACK

She’s a screenwriter who has offered you her biting observations and keen advice through the voices of some of your favorite TV characters, from “Sex and the City” to “Modern Family.” But, if you’re not watching as much television as the rest of us, you may also have read her column in O, The Oprah Magazine, or her best-selling “The Between Boyfriends Book.” With her new “The Longest Date: Life as a Wife,” Chupack finds that her “ever after” is more nuanced than just “happily,” but it is her ever after, after all. Sat. 4 p.m. Free. Book Soup, 8818 W. Sunset Blvd., West Hollywood. (310) 659-3110. ” target=”_blank”>shulamitgallery.com

REBECCA PIDGEON 

Are you a big fan of the band Ruby Blue? What about David Mamet’s “Oleanna”? Whether you love her for her British folk/pop sound or her strong and challenging acting performances, you will be delighted by her company. Join The Hub for an intimate evening with the soft and sweet sounds of this American Brit. Sat. 9 p.m. $15. The Hub on Venice, 11827 Venice Blvd., Mar Vista. (310) 915-5200. MON | JAN 13

DIANE VON FURSTENBERG

The internationally acclaimed designer will speak about her more than 30-year career as a woman who helped to create power and independence in what women wore. Von Furstenberg joins Stefano Tonchi, editor-in-chief of W Magazine, for a conversation that will offer a peek into one well-dressed lifetime. LACMA’s Costume Council presents the event in conjunction with its new exhibition, “Diane Von Furstenberg: Journey of a Dress,” which runs through April 1. Mon. 6 p.m. $45 (general). LACMA, 5905 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles. (323) 857-6010. ” target=”_blank”>wisela.org.


TUES | JAN 14

“TO THE POINT: POSTERS BY DAN REISINGER”

Born in Serbia, Dan Reisinger is a source of Israeli pride and joy. Known internationally for his innovative use of symbols and vibrant visual language, Reisinger has created posters that are iconic stamps of culture, commercialism and politics. The exhibition spans 50 years and celebrates Reisinger’s unique successes in “maximum meaning” by “minimum means.” Through April 20. Tue. Free. Skirball Cultural Center, 2701 N. Sepulveda Blvd., Los Angeles. (310) 440-4500. WED | JAN 15

ALEXIS GERSHWIN

The niece of legendary songwriters George and Ira Gershwin is in town for a one-night-only performance. On the heels of releasing a retrospective album, “Long Ago and Far Away,” Gershwin will perform some of your favorites, such as “The Man I Love,” “Embraceable You” and “I’ve got Rhythm.” Under the musical direction of Steven Applegate and with a big band behind her, Gershwin will do her uncles proud with an evening that both pays tribute to and revitalizes music that is all in the family. Wed. 8:30 p.m. $30. Catalina Bar and Grill, 6725 W. Sunset Blvd., Hollywood. (323) 466-2210. THU | JAN 16

GARY SHTEYNGART

Don’t miss out on the huge success of “Little Failure,” a memoir from the man who brought you “Super Sad True Love Story,” “The Russian Debutante’s Handbook” and “Absurdistan.” Named a New Yorker Best Novelist Under 40, Shteyngart, who was born in Leningrad, tells an immigrant story with wit, candidness and moving insight. Thu. 8 p.m. $24 (general, including hardcover book), $20 (member, including hardcover book), $10 (lecture only). Skirball Cultural Center, 2701 N. Sepulveda Blvd., Los Angeles. (310) 440-4500. FRI | JAN 17

JOAN RIVERS

The new year means we are all ripe for self-deprecation, and there is no one better to serve as our shepherd than Ms. Rivers. For more than 50 years she has been making us laugh, think, squirm, agree and disagree. Whether you saw her on “The Tonight Show With Johnny Carson,” spent revealing time with her in the documentary “Joan Rivers: A Piece of Work” or watch her during awards season, you know exactly who Joan is, and what you have to look forward to. Fri. 9 p.m. $77- $225. Saban Theatre, 8440 Wilshire Blvd., Beverly Hills. (323) 655-0111. Calendar: January 11-17 Read More »

What lies beneath

I don’t mean to alarm the global scientific community, but I feel I have an obligation, in these nascent days of 2014, to share a potentially disturbing finding I came upon at the end of last year.

Ladies and gentlemen: Einstein was wrong. 

At least one of his theories — the one about the definition of madness — is complete fallacy. I don’t know when he arrived at it, or what kind of green and gullible following he suckered into believing it or how he managed to pound it into the collective consciousness of the Western world, but I can tell you, my friends, Einstein did not know my mother.

Take, for example, the act of posing the same question to one person multiple times. Assuming you ask the same way, and that the respondent is truthful, forthcoming and not under duress, Einstein would tell you that, insignificant variations notwithstanding, you are going to get the same answer every time. Einstein would be wrong. 

All my life, I’ve asked my mother about her family. Specifically, I’ve asked about HER grandparents, Peacock of Esfahan and her lady-killing, tar-playing, rich-when-all-the-other-Jews-were-poor husband, Soleyman Khan. I knew he married her when she was 9 years old and he was somewhere in his 20s; that he had been flagrantly unfaithful to her; that she had borne four children and then divorced him. What happened after that is less evident. Time and again, I asked my mother the same two questions. For the first 40 years or so, she gave the same two answers. 

 

What did Peacock do after she left Soleyman Khan? 

She worked hard and became successful, raised her children, lived well past 100. 

 

What did Soleyman Khan do after Peacock left him? 

He lost all his money, got sick and died. 

 

Maybe it was the implausibility of arriving at such poetic justice in real life, the Hollywood ending of the ill-treated wife being rewarded for rebelling while her evil-doing husband gets his comeuppance. Or maybe it was the sparseness of the narrative. Maybe I just don’t have a life and try, instead, to live vicariously through dead people. Something, at any rate, prompted me to keep asking. 

Just as His Brilliance predicted, I always got the same result. 

Years went by. Every so often I’d meet a stranger who, my mother would casually announce, was related to us through Soleyman Khan. That was amusing, but it did not raise major alarm. Everyone, after all, was related to each other in the ghetto. Here and there, too, I’d catch my father uttering Soleyman Khan’s name in a story about a shooting by a jealous husband, a daily regimen of 12 raw eggs for breakfast meant to enhance virility, more than a few all-nighters of lamb kebob and arrack in the company of a harem-load of women. My father isn’t much of a raconteur; he’ll say two words where a thousand are needed. So I’d go back to my mother and ask: 

 

What else did Soleyman Khan do after Peacock left him? 

Wasted all his money, got sick and died. 

 

I realized some titillating details might be missing from the response to Question No. 2, but I told myself Einstein couldn’t be wrong, men were always sleeping around back then, it was so common, it’s not even worth mentioning, I should stop being paranoid, act more like a scientist. 

A few days before Christmas, we’re at my sister’s house for dinner. When I walk in, my mother is in the living room with my niece, watching a holiday-themed movie on Netflix. I sit down and say, “I’m so sick of all the Christmas stuff.” 

Apparently in response to this, or perhaps just inspired by the film, my mother says, “I have a cousin who’s a nun.” 

I’m sure I’ve misheard. 

“What do you mean?” I lean in to make sure I get it right. 

“I have a cousin who’s a nun,” she says without taking her eyes off the television screen. “She lives in a convent.” 

Fifty years of living with my mother, and this is the first I’ve heard of nuns and convents. 

“A real cousin?” 

“Yeah. She’s Soleyman Khan’s grandkid.” 

Oh. 

“How’s that possible?” 

Instead of clarifying, she chooses to complicate. 

“I have another cousin who’s a priest.” 

Where? Where are these cousins who’ve suddenly sprung out of the ether? 

“A Catholic priest?”

“Is there another kind?” She laughs. “He lives in Israel.” 

I stop to gather my thoughts. It proves to be a long and fruitless campaign.

“What did Soleyman Khan do after he divorced Peacock?” Like, in addition to getting sick and dying. Or losing all his money. 

“Did he marry a second time? Was his second wife Catholic?”  

“No,” she says, cool as a cucumber. “She was Muslim.” 

“You mean she was a ‘temporary wife’?” I ask. In Islam, every man can have three permanent wives and as many temporary ones as he wishes at one time. “Temporary” can mean anything from five minutes to 99 years. Where other men might have a mistress, a one-night stand or a date with a prostitute, Muslim men would have temporary wives. 

“No. That one was permanent.” 

That one? 

“You mean, there were temporary ones as well?” 

“Probably.” 

“So,” I summarize. “After Peacock divorced him, Soleyman Khan became poor, got sick and died, but not before marrying one permanent and who-knows-how-many temporary wives?” 

“No.” 

Where is Einstein where you need him?

“No, he didn’t take one permanent — albeit Muslim — wife and any number of temporary ones?” I ask. 

“He took two permanent wives.” 

Forget the suddenly debunked, got-sick-and-died narrative I’ve been force-fed up till now, or my admittedly pathetic fascination with the tales of ordinary people who lived and died in obscurity. In Soleyman’s time, a Jewish man found to have “relations” with a Muslim woman was summarily executed, the ghetto from which he hailed subjected to an invasion, his fellow Jews forced to convert to Islam as recompense for his sin. 

“How did he get away with marrying two Muslim women?” 

“Only one of them was Muslim,” my mother says. Then, lest I be tempted to believe in Einstein ever again, she adds, “The other was Christian.” 

Oh. Hence, the convent. 

“And you’ve always known this?” 

She raises her hands, palms up, to indicate the answer is obvious. 

“Of course.” 

Of course. 

“Why didn’t you say anything before?” 

Now, she’s laughing in earnest. 

“I don’t know. It didn’t come up.” 

“You mean, except for the first 500 times I asked?”

She looks at me with not a trace of guile. 

“What did you ask?” 

“What did Soleyman Khan do …” 

Oh. That. Now, she’s really wondering if I’m dense. 

“I told you. He lost all his …” 

OK. So. Importance is in the eye of the beholder. My mother probably thought the only part of Soleyman Khan’s fate that was newsworthy was the concluding chapter. This is a characteristically Eastern view, the philosophy behind that most lofty of all blessings, aah-gheh-bat beh kheyr beh-shi — may you end well. Marriage, divorce, wealth or poverty, surrender or conquest — all that’s trivia when compared to one’s aah-gheh-bat — ending. Einstein, being European and all, did not know this. He probably wasn’t aware that in some parts of the world, truth has many layers — some visible to the untrained eye and others, not. Otherwise, I have to believe, he, too, would keep asking.


Gina Nahai is an author and a professor of creative writing at USC. Her latest novel is “Caspian Rain” (MacAdam Cage, 2007). Her column appears monthly in the Journal.

What lies beneath Read More »

Screenwriter Robert J. Avrech Q&A: ‘The door to Sharia in America is opened’

Screenwriter and producer Robert J. Avrech believes in making message films that articulate morals and values. In 2000, he won an Emmy for penning the Holocaust drama “The Devil’s Arithmetic,” about a petulant teenager who resists her Judaism until offered a portal into the Jewish past. He also wrote the 1992 film “A Stranger Among Us,” starring Melanie Griffith as an undercover cop who insinuates herself into New York’s Chasidic community. On Twitter, Avrech describes himself as a religious Zionist, a Republican and a gun owner. He talks here about his problem with gay marriage, his fear of Islamic jihad and why he's madly in love with his wife.

In your recent piece for Jewish Action, the official magazine for the Orthodox Union, you claim Hollywood is executing “a brilliant, insidious stealth attack” on Jewish values and American culture. Is that because you would prefer Hollywood to foreground your own conservative values? 

Robert Avrech: Obviously I would prefer that there be conservative values pushed in Hollywood movies, the way it used to be. But what’s happening now is that the values that are being pushed in Hollywood are pretty radical. There was a tremendous turning point in the culture when the sitcom “Friends” put on a lesbian marriage. And the redefinition of marriage is a radical idea, whether you agree with it or not. 

You seem bothered by the preponderance of same-sex marriage in television and film.

I’m not really interested in gay marriage. I believe gays should get married if they want to get married. I have no problem with that. I want people to love each other. It’s the state intervention that bothers me, because then the state is going to have to involve itself in polygamy. One has to accept that when gay marriage becomes the law of the land in a majority of states. Then a Muslim is going to come forward with two wives, and he’s going to demand the right to marry his two wives. And once that happens, the door to Sharia in America is opened. 

As an avowed gun owner, you must be glad that Hollywood frequently depicts the use of guns. Why didn’t your article address Hollywood’s influence on the epidemic of gun violence in this country?

I don’t know that Hollywood has a role in that. I think evil has a role in acts of violence. There is no empirical evidence that Hollywood causes people to act out in violent ways. It simply doesn’t exist.

Hollywood can influence the redefinition of marriage but cannot encourage gun violence?

The very first narrative movie that was ever made was “The Great Train Robbery,” which is basically a bunch of guys riding on horses robbing a train. And the last shot is the actor turning toward the camera and firing his gun toward the audience. Now, that was thrilling for the audience. But people didn’t go out afterward and start shooting people — that we know of. 

So you decry Hollywood for influencing the normalization of same-sex marriage but not its normalization of gun violence.

I don’t believe that violence in the movies enables violence in culture. There’s simply no way that movies in Germany in the 1920s promoted violence and caused people to become genocidal toward the Jews. There were propaganda movies, certainly, but violence in movies did not cause genocide.  

You claim America wins wars only when Hollywood believes in them. So what do you make of the recent explosive revelations that Hollywood studios were economically intertwined with Hitler’s Third Reich?

I haven’t read those books, so I really can’t comment on them. [But] I know anecdotally that if you look at the films made during wartime, the first-tier actors were pretty much absent, because they were in the army serving their country: Goebbels put a million-dollar bounty on Clark Gable’s head, because he was a machine gunner on a bomber — and that infuriated Hitler, because Hitler’s favorite movie was “Gone With the Wind.”

What values should Hollywood promote?

[My first choice] would be Hollywood admitting that the greatest danger to civilization itself right now is jihad and jihadists. Hollywood should confront that the way they confronted the Nazi threat and the imperial Japanese threat. 

Don’t you watch “Homeland”?

I don’t like the show. I simply found the relationship between Claire Danes’ character and the British actor dopey. I didn’t believe it. It was more of a narrative problem than a political problem. 

In your article, you sound kind of peeved recalling a time when a studio hired you to write a script for a film (that ultimately didn’t get made) with the caveat: “Don’t malign all Muslims.” Isn’t that a reasonable request?

If you read the script, you would see that there were sympathetic Muslims within the movie. One of the characters was quite heroic, as a matter of fact. The problem is CAIR [the Council on American-Islamic Relations], which is a front for the Muslim Brotherhood. Their position is clear and unequivocal: No Muslim should ever be presented as a terrorist. Period. End of story. 

Considering your strict religious upbringing, what drew you down the unconventional path to the movie business? 

I was a very bad student, practically a juvenile delinquent. I’m the only Jewish kid that I know of who is basically a high-school dropout. So when my friends were learning Gemara and preparing for pre-med, I was watching “The Seven Samurai” by Akira Kurosawa or “Vertigo” by Alfred Hitchcock. That was my education. The only two things I ever wanted out of life were to work in Hollywood and marry my wife. 

You recently published the book “How I Married Karen,” about your love affair with your wife. What is it about her?

She was the only Jewish girl I ever dated who, when I told her what I wanted to do in life, told me it was a wonderful ambition, and that she had faith that I would be able to do it.

Screenwriter Robert J. Avrech Q&A: ‘The door to Sharia in America is opened’ Read More »

Obituaries

Kenneth Allweis died Dec. 15 at 72. Survived by wife Eugenia Presser; sister Vida Brenner; friends Jack (Barbara) Berman. Hillside

Abram Dancyger died Dec. 14 at 94. Survived by sons Michael (Barbara), Ted; 4 grandchildren; brother Shaya-Herzka Danziger. Mount Sinai

Ella Deutsch died Dec. 14 at 96. Survived by daughter Julia (Tom) Loats; son Gary; 2 grandchildren; 5 great-grandchildren. Hillside

Gary Goldstein died Dec. 16 at 82. Survived by son Adam (Dana); 2 grandchildren; ex-wife Elizabeth. Hillside

Melvin Kaiser died Dec. 16 at 83. Survived by wife Teri; daughters Kim (Allen) Brody, Stacy (Bruce) Mendelson; son Brett (Jennifer); 6 grandchildren. Mount Sinai

Julian Kinrich died Nov. 29 at 96. Survived by daughter Lisa Silverman; son Jeff. Mount Sinai

Eric Koch died Dec. 16 at 91. Survived by daughter Tracy; son-in-law Allen Fienberg. Mount Sinai

Anne Perlman died Dec. 14 at 79. Survived by daughters Laura Perlman-Merritt, Michelle (Chris), Terry; sons Joel (Jill), Larry (Rosa); 5 grandchildren; 6 great-grandchildren; sister Judy Kravetz; brother Robert Slutsky. Mount Sinai

Kelly Pollack died Dec. 16 at 45. Survived by husband Bradley; daughters Devon, Hudson; mother Charlene Ruta; father Bernard Ruta; brother Grant Ruta. Mount Sinai

Raasche Rips died Dec. 14 at 98. Survived by son Martin; 1 grandchild. Mount Sinai

Evelyn Scholder died Dec. 15 at 77. Survived by husband Fred; daughters Amy (Sarah Valdez), Stacy; 1 grandchild. Mount Sinai

Jerome Segal died Dec. 17 at 82. Survived by wife Tobelle; daughter Sandra Sigman; son Alan; 2 grandchildren. Mount Sinai

Karl Seligman died Dec. 14 at 81. Survived by wife Johanna; daughter Susan Collins Hamilton; sons David, Daniel, Dean; stepdaughters Renee Bogar, Judy Miller, Suzie Steres; 4 grandchildren. Mount Sinai

Bertha Sherman died Dec. 14 at 89. Survived by daughter Carol (Menasche) Nass; son Gene (Ellen); 4 grandchildren. Hillside

Kenneth Siporin died Dec. 15 at 51. Survived by mother Gloria; father Walter; sister Erica (Marc) Ladenheim; brother Matthew. Mount Sinai

Harriet Wolstan died Dec. 17 at 93. Survived by daughters Michelle (Jonathan) Girard, Robbie (Stephen) Prepas; son Barry (Judith); 7 grandchildren; 4 great-grandchildren; brother Arnold Widdes. Hillside

Leonard Zeitlin died Dec. 15 at 84. Survived by wife Joan; daughters Julie (Rick Vincent), Susan; nephew Michael Mendelsohn; 1 great-niece; 5 cousins. Groman Eden 

Obituaries Read More »

Letters to the editor: Jordan Belfort, Azerbaijan and defending Israel

Treating the Moral, Ethical Sickness Spread by MoneyÏ

As a state and federal criminal prosecutor, I can tell you that for every Bernard Madoff or Jordan Belfort, there are dozens of Jewish white-collar criminals you will never read about (“ ‘The Wolf’ and the Jewish Problem,” Jan. 3). Rob Eshman is right on the money when he declares that our rabbis and leaders are not doing enough to address this issue. I leave the criminal courthouse on Friday afternoon, but often I do not — I cannot — leave the hustling, the quest for material glory and the egos that landed the defendants in jail in the first place. No, those conversations about business and material desires continue in the synagogues. Non-Jews do not point to Jews as the models of business ethics. Until that happens, our leaders should spare no effort tackling this cancer.  

David Peyman via e-mail

I always read your columns with great interest, but the “Wolf” one really got me thinking. You are so right!

Strangely enough, it is interesting that doctors love lecturing about diseases that almost never occur (so they can be the world’s authority on something obscure) but avoid talking about common problems (where they have to know their facts cold). Moreover, just like your examples about the American Studies Association and Swarthmore College’s Hillel, the earlier conversation is easy to have because it involves no conflict or change in practice patterns. The latter, if it actually suggests changes to care, is an exceedingly difficult topic and will inevitably antagonize many.

Distinguishing greed from ambition and security is very subjective. But one thing that is clear is that I see a bright line of moral behavior that I could never cross. It is not Belfort’s, Boesky’s or Madoff’s desire for wealth that disgusts me; it is that they either were too damaged to see the line or willingly crossed it. Can seeing that line be taught? 

There is an entire field of literature devoted to “the genetics of morality.” It is plausible that those who acted immorally were more likely to be beaten by their co-humans and didn’t live to reproduce. 

Steven Teitelbaum, Santa Monica

The question of what motivates people is a thorny and at times comedic one. We are balls of contradiction, tightly wound. There is nothing for the Jordan Belforts of the world to measure up against: “Desiring this man’s art and that man’s scope/with what I most enjoy contented least.” I’ve been there! And it’s not a pretty place to be.  

I would only add that the costs of this institutionalized greed are more than the nest eggs, to which you alluded, that will be lost. The cost must also somehow tally the pain of not measuring up, of not knowing ourselves, of chasing a buck at any cost — what David Foster Wallace put as life “under the ceaseless neon bottle.” In other words, the cost is our humanity at large.   

Crawford Coates via e-mail


Azerbaijanis Set Valuable Example for Mideast

I would like to express my gratitude to Rob Eshman for his article “The Mysteries of Azerbaijan” (Dec. 20, 2013), about the Jewish community in Azerbaijan. Amid the violent ethnic conflicts that have been rattling the Caucasus over the past two decades, the co-existence of Jewish and Muslim Azerbaijanis in peace, harmony and mutual respect may serve as an exemplary model for the Middle East. 

I also especially thank Mr. Eshman for his courage in highlighting the common grief over the 1918 massacre of Muslims and Jews carried out by the Bolshevik and the Armenian Dashnak forces under Gen. Hamazasp Srvandztyan. Without delving into the unfortunate debate surrounding the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict, the acknowledgment of this horrific 1918 atrocity constitutes a proper recognition of its victims and survivors. And regardless of their ethnic or religious affiliation, such recognition is an important step toward peace and reconciliation.

Javid Huseynov, General Director of the Azerbaijani-American Council


Time to Put Differences Aside

Kudos to David Suissa, who once again hit the nail on the head (“Why Won’t Liberals Defend Israel?” Dec. 20, 2013).

Unfortunately, Israel is surrounded by anti-Semites who do a good job of pummeling us at every opportunity. If only we could scale back our own divisiveness to support and defend each other (even when we disagree, as all families do), how much stronger we would be as a nation.

Miriam Fisher, Los Angeles


correction

The correct contact information for Temple Emanuel of Beverly Hills’ Jan. 10 Shabbat Shira,  the Shabbat of Song event (Calendar, Jan. 3),  is (310) 409-4634, tebh.org. 

Letters to the editor: Jordan Belfort, Azerbaijan and defending Israel Read More »