fbpx

December 27, 2013

One Israeli creation for the weekend

Matti Caspi is an Israeli composer, singer, musician and lyricist. His many creations, for him and for other Israeli artists, granted him the title of one of Israel’s top musicians.


His musical career launched while serving in the IDF as a performer in the Southern Command Troupe. He formed a trio with two of his friends, Gadi Oron and Ya’akov Noy, called The Three Fat Men. With this trio Caspi came out with his first big hit, Ani Met (I am dying). During the 70’s, Caspi worked closely with songwriter Ehud Manor, and together they created some of his most popular songs. Later, Caspi began working with the biggest names in the Israeli music industry, such as Shlomo Gronich, Ehud Manor, Yehudit Ravitz, and Shalom Hanoch.

 

So far, Caspi has released close to 1,000 songs, for himself and for others. He released a total of 29 albums with original songs as well as remakes of older songs. He is known for his complicated music style with a unique use of harmonies, influenced by jazz, Brazilian music, rock and Latin music.

 

Lakahta Et Yadi BeYadcha (You took my hand with your hand)

 

Brit Olan (Eternal alliance)

One Israeli creation for the weekend Read More »

Rosner’s Torah-Talk: Parashat Va’era with Rabbi Daniel Brenner

Our special guest this week is Rabbi Daniel Brenner, Chief of Education and Program at Moving Traditions. Prior to joining Moving Traditions, Rabbi Brenner was the founding Executive Director of Birthright Israel NEXT and he developed and directed graduate-level training programs at both Auburn Theological Seminary and CLAL -– The National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership. A graduate of the Reconstructionist Rabbinical College, Brenner's commentaries have been featured in the New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Jerusalem Post,Forward, Jewish Week and on the NPR show The Infinite Mind.

The week's Torah portion- Parashat Va'era (Exodus 6:2-9:35)- features Moses and Aaron's appearance before Pharaoh, their showdown with Pharaoh's sorcerers, and the first seven plagues of Egypt. Our discussion focuses, among other things, on the hardening of Pharaoh's heart and on the enigmatic question regarding God's role in it.

 

Rosner’s Torah-Talk: Parashat Va’era with Rabbi Daniel Brenner Read More »

Getting to 100 – What Makes for a Long and Healthy life?

“Eat boiled corn with codfish and cream, and laugh…”

“Smoke a good cigar, avoid alcohol, drink water, stay positive, and sing.”

“Thumb your nose at sadness, turn the tables on tragedy, laugh instead of getting angry, and don’t feel envious of anyone.”

“Find a good wife and drink two scotches every night.”

“Fight injustice, help people in trouble and keep your mind active.”

“Do something new each day, avoid drama and stay far away from difficult people.”

“Mind your own business, don’t eat junk food, treat others well, and work hard at what you love.”

“Live for God, pray and surround yourself with nice people.”

These are ten responses given by people who have lived more than 100 years to the question – “Why have you lived so long?”

I’ve thought about the fact of longevity, especially this week, because I visited a house of mourning for a 39 year-old man whose life was cut way too short by cancer, and two days later I officiated at the funeral of a venerable 102 year-old woman who had it all.

Common wisdom says that if we eat well, exercise and manage stress; if we maintain our social connections and faith, then we’ll live long and happily!

Of course, this isn’t always the case. Some of us are more prone to disease and accident than others no matter how healthy we try and live.

Researchers say that genetic factors offer only part of the explanation for why we live longer or shorter amounts of time, but there's much more to it. It’s now clear that there are many behavioral factors contributing to a person’s longevity including health and health behaviors, gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, stress, social and environmental support, mental health, and life satisfaction.

Perhaps the most important study on longevity is “The Longevity Project” written by psychology professors Howard Friedman and Leslie Martin of UC Riverside, who culminate an eight-decade long study begun in 1921 of 1500 precocious children by Stanford University psychologist Lewis Terman. Terman died in 1956 so future researchers picked up where he left off, including Drs. Friedman and Martin.

The 1500 children were followed in meticulous detail throughout their lives. In studying them Friedman and Martin conclude that

“The best childhood predictor of longevity [is] conscientiousness—the qualities of a prudent, persistent, well-organized person—somewhat obsessive and not at all carefree….It’s not the happy-go-lucky who thrive—it’s the prudent and persistent who flourish through the years.”

They offer three possible reasons for this. First,

“…conscientious people do more … to protect their health and engage in fewer [risky] activities …. are less likely to smoke or drive too fast. They buckle their seat belts and follow the doctor’s advice…They are not necessarily risk averse but they tend to be sensible in evaluating how far to push the envelope.”

Second, some of us are

“…biologically predisposed to be …more conscientious and healthier ….less prone to develop certain diseases, … these people have different levels of the chemical…serotonin in their brains [serotonin helps to determine happiness and well-being]…Individuals with low levels of serotonin tend to be much more impulsive…” and they eat more and sleep less.

And third,

“Having a conscientious personality leads a person into healthier situations and relationships… happier marriages, better friendships and healthier work situations.”

This study showed that kids described as cheerful and optimistic did not live as long as those boring and serious kids who worried constantly about school, studied and worked hard.

The one factor that best predicted long life, even more than happiness itself, is purposeful goal-oriented work, whether for a paycheck or for its own sake. People who are drawn to live their lives, however, with other like-minded, healthy, active and involved people significantly increase the odds of their living longer and more happily.

And so, what does our tradition have to offer about what makes for a long and good life?

The Book of Proverbs instructs us to behave moderately in all things, to seek the middle path, to acquire knowledge and understanding in the ways of the world, and to seek higher wisdom. We’re called upon to build stable communities that care for all its citizens, to act with dignity, integrity, honesty, generosity, and kindness, to respect the wisdom given us by the generations, to heal ourselves and repair the world, and to walk humbly before God.

Judaism teaches that it’s not the number of days or years that we live, it’s the quality of those days that matters.

I pray that each of us will be blessed not only with length of years, but also with the knowledge that we lived ethically and compassionately having contributed to making our world a better place. Amen!

Getting to 100 – What Makes for a Long and Healthy life? Read More »

Delta screwed up. Should Jews take advantage?

New York to Honolulu, round-trip, tax included: $85

Cleveland to Los Angeles, round-trip, tax included: $52

Los Angeles to Honolulu, round-trip, tax included: $60

These were a few of the ” target=”_blank”>”HURRY! CRAZY DELTA PRICE MISTAKES!,” alerting its followers to snatch tickets before Delta rectified the error. 593 people commented on the post. Here are some of them:

“Thanks! Just purchased 2 round trip tickets JFK –> LAX on 1/23-1/27 for a TOTAL of $50.82!”

“JFK-PHX for Memorial Day = $39 business class. :-D”

“Just bought my ticket to LA for winter break for $42.11! Thanks Dan!”

“4 Bus class tix in May 2014 JFK – SAN, $39.40 each. Awesome.”

“YEEEEEEAAHH!! Just booked 2 ticks JFK to Los Angeles. I was going to miss a cuzin’s bar mitzvah, they are going to be so happy. Huge surprise!”

“just shorted delta stock.”

One female commenter wrote that she purchased four tickets, her four sisters in seminary purchased a total of 25 tickets over Passover break, and her fifth sister purchased seven tickets–each ticket was $46. She didn't specify the origin or destination of the tickets but one can presume that's one heck of a discount, especially if the seminary is in Israel.

These deals weren't just for coach tickets. They applied to business class and first class, according to TheStar.com:

“Airfarewatchdogs.com, a travel and fare lookout website, said fares went as low as $40 for a round trip between New York and Los Angeles, and $200 for a first-class round trip ticket between Los Angeles and Hawaii. Economy rates for round-trip travel between New York and Los Angeles on Delta typically cost around $400 or more. A first-class round-trip ticket from Los Angeles to Hawaii for the second week of January currently costs more than $3,500 on the Delta website.”

This author's initial reaction when he heard about the deal (too late) was disappointment. He booked a round-trip flight from Los Angeles to Honolulu about two weeks ago at full price, over $400. Yesterday, the same exact flight was selling at a better than 75 percent discount. Friends of his are taking unexpected vacations, and flying business and first class on the way! Meanwhile, he'll be squeezed into a coach chair, sitting next to a wailing infant, drinking flat Diet Coke and eating stale pretzels. It's no fun to miss out on a deal. Bargains don't only feel good because you're paying less. They feel good because you think you “won.” It's an ego boost and an adrenaline rush to be part of a select club of people flying first class, round-trip from New York to Puerto Rico for less money than it takes to fill up your car.

But it's also an ethical dilemma.

Is it right to take advantage of a company's pricing error? Writing this, the author imagines a portion of readers will view him as a goodie two-shoes. But so be it; It's a legitimate moral question. At what point would someone feel that they undercompensated a company for a good they received? What if flights from New York to Honolulu were $0? Would that make people think a second time? What if, in what would be an even quirkier glitch, Delta Airlines also offered $100 gift cards along with a $0 round-trip Tel Aviv to Philadelphia flight? Would that make the sisters studying in an Orthodox seminary do a double-take before clicking, “Purchase?”

That the only reaction to the Delta glitch seems to be glee suggests something: An overwhelming number of Americans feel that businesses, or at least businesses that don't resemble a neighborhood flower shop, deserve to be taken advantage of. If Delta, or Wal-Mart, or Costco, makes a pricing mistake, well, that's their problem. They overcharged me last time anyways, right?

But let us take this attitude to it's logical conclusion. What if Delta didn't fix the mistake after two hours? What if it took a month to fix the fares but Delta was still legally required (as it is now) to honor all advertised prices? People would rush to purchase every last ticket, not considering that doing so would endanger the survival of the very business that's flying them from Point A to Point B (let's assume, for the sake of argument, that Delta doesn't have insurance for this).

Purchasing a Delta glitch ticket is not, theft, to be clear. But it's also not the ideal. Economic ethics is a two-way street. We expect to be fairly compensated when we give companies cash. We should be expected to fairly compensate them when they give us goods and provide us with services. A $39 business class ticket from New York to Phoenix doesn't seem like fair compensation to Delta. Again, not theft. But not ideal.

A local rabbi who this author spoke with this morning said that he saw incredible deals to New York on Thursday morning. Before he saw the deal, he was actually hoping to take a trip there with his family. Perfect, right? Well, he decided against taking advantage of Delta. Why? Because he was concerned that doing so would help give Jews (and God) a bad name. He thinks that it is mostly Jews who took advantage of the glitch (perhaps thanks in large part to Dan's Deals), and that it will be obvious to staff at Delta, when going through the list of bargain buyers, that a lot of Cohens and Levins are flying the JFK-LAX route. This, he fears, will help lower the esteem of Jews in some peoples' eyes.

The Talmud somewhat addresses this in Bava Metzia:

“R. Chaninah told this story: Some rabbinic scholars bought one pile of wheat from some gentile soldiers. [The scholars] found in it a bundle of money and returned it to [the soldiers]. [The soldiers] said 'Blessed is the G-d of the Jews.'”

It's not perfectly analogous to the Delta situation, but the point is that Jews should hold themselves to an elevated moral standard because doing so is a kiddush HaShem, a sanctifcation of God's name. Presumably, acting unethically (even only a tad bit), could be a chillul HaShem, a desecration of God's name. 

If this author had heard about the deal on time, perhaps he would've also taken advantage of Delta and written a post rationalizing why it's the company's obligation to post correct prices, not the consumer's obligation to speculate about what constitute's fair compensation, and not the Jewish consumer's obligation to figure out the line between sanctification and desecration of God's name.

But he got to the party late, so here he is agitating his good friends who were lucky enough to raid Delta before it fixed the glitch.

The point here is not to judge. The nature of any ethical dilemma is that both sides have legitimate arguments. For one, major companies usually account, in advance, for a certain amount of money that will be lost throughout the year–often through outright theft, in the case of a department store, but also through day-to-day errors. 

But it's disconcerting that a huge portion of Americans, and Jews in particular, seem to have ignored the very existence of an ethical dilemma in this case. This author has no beef with someone who thought through the ethics and decided it was ok to purchase a glitch ticket. But one would hope that at the very least, if anyone would be concerned about ethical dilemmas, consumer obligations and chillul HaShem, it would be the sister who bragged in a public forum that her four siblings (studying Torah) in seminary purchased round-trip Passover glitch tickets for $46 apiece.

Delta screwed up. Should Jews take advantage? Read More »

Do We Need to ReName God?

n the traditional Jewish cycle of Torah reading, we are near the beginning of the Book of Exodus, the transformational story of successful resistance to slavery. But in the classical Jewish tradition the book is not known as Exodus, but rather as The Book of Names (Sefer Shemot).

Interestingly, early in The Book of Names, God goes through a name change.

This is no minor sideslip. Think of the furor when Cassius Clay changed his name to Muhammad Ali; think of the political and personal transformation undergone when David Grün changed his name to Ben-Gurion.

And these were mere mortals! For the Eternal One, Who suffuses the entire universe, to undertake a name change is seismic, cosmic.

It happens first at the Burning Bush. Here, Moses faces the unquenchable fiery Voice who sends him on a mission to end slavery under Pharaoh. Before accepting this great challenge, Moses tells the Voice that the people will challenge him, asking for a divine name to support Moses’ claims.

And so, the Holy One (the Wholly One) answers, Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh — “I Will Be Who I Will Be” — a fitting name for the animating Spirit in a universe in which the powerless poor can be empowered and a pharaoh’s power can dissolve like powder into the Sea of Reeds. Then God adds, “But that’s a mouthful, so you can just use Ehyeh — I Will Be — as my nickname.”

“And, oh yes, you can also call me YHWH.” But we actually can’t! There’s no way to pronounce those four letters without vowels (as they appear in the Torah scroll). And for a couple of millennia now, Jews have been strictly taught not even to try pronouncing this mysterious name, but instead to use Adonai — “Lord.”

Now, why do we think that God undergoes this name change?

YHWH (Ex. 6: 2-3). This time, Moses is in Egypt; his first try at liberation and at organizing Brickmakers Union, Local 1, has failed miserably. The Voice then says explicitly that the name by which God was known to Moses’ forebears — El Shaddai, the Breasted God —  the “God of Nourishment and Nurturance”  — is not sufficient for the liberation process at hand.

Why this second voicing of the new name?

I suggest that Moses, since the bush and during his first effort in Egypt, has been too reticent about using the new name. He has too often reverted to the old one on the warm-hearted assumption that his listeners would be more comfortable with it. But the old name alone will not inspire a new sense of reality. That is an essential reason why Moses failed and the Brickmakers Union collapsed.

The point is that when the world is turning upside down or inside out, God must be differently named; God is different when the world is different. Human beings cannot deeply absorb the newness of the world and their own crucial need to act on that newness unless they are challenged to rename reality.

Today, even more so than in the days of Moses and the Israelites, the world is undergoing a radical transformation; the great web of life is stressed as never before in the history of the human species. We must rename God to be truthful to this changing reality and to teach ourselves to act in new and bold ways.

It is for this reason that I have been urging people in our generation to come to know God anew by “pronouncing” the unpronounceable name by simply breathing deeply and consciously — YHWH, with no vowels — YyyyHhhhWwwwHhhh — the Breath of Life, the One who sustains all of life, “Interbreath.” We breathe in what the trees breathe out; the trees breathe in what we breathe out; we breathe each other into life, and YHWH flows through all of these interactions.

What we call the “climate crisis” is a radical disturbance in the Earth’s atmosphere that has thrown out of balance the mixture of what we breathe out and what the trees breathe out, that is, the balance of CO2 and oxygen. Human action is sending more CO2 into the atmosphere than Mother Earth can breathe.

If we hear  YHWH as the interbreathing of all life, then that Name itself, and the reality it seeks to express, is now in crisis. God’s breath is constricted. Choking.

We cannot begin to engage in a meaningful healing process so long as we refuse to name this deep wound and invoke different names for ultimate reality. Continuing to simply use the established names for God, especially those associated with domination — “Lord” and “King” — will not work. We must reclaim the deep truth of YHWH, the healing breath within the name.

In making this urgent call for renaming, I am not suggesting that we do away altogether with all other names for God in the Jewish tradition, but I am challenging us (as feminist thinkers did so powerfully in recent times) to think deeply about the names we use for God and what they do and do not inspire in us. How can our sacred language be most powerful in helping us meet the urgent issues — ecological and otherwise — of our time? I believe that the name YHWH needs to be included more regularly and consciously in our ritual lives (by substituting at least some of the familiar names with the mindful breathing of this ancient name), so that we can go out from our synagogues and study houses ready to take meaningful ethical and political action.

Try an experiment for yourself: “Baruch attah Yahhh elohenu ruach ha'olam … “Blessed are You, Interbreathing-spirit of the world …”  Are you attracted by ReNaming God in a long breath —  Naming God as the Prophet Elijah heard God speaking in a “still small Voice” — the sound of simply Breathing.

The Hebrew word “davar” can mean either “word” or “deed.” If we can conceive of God through a new word, a new name, we can also act far more effectively to bring about the changes that our planet so desperately needs. For Moses, the new name made possible both resisting Pharaoh and shaping a new kind of society. For us, it means resisting the modern carbon pharaohs that bring new plagues upon our planet, and taking greater responsibility for building a global society that is based on a heightened awareness of the interconnection of all life, that indeed, YHWH, the Breath of Life, is one.

* Rabbi Arthur Waskow is director of The Shalom Center <https://www.theshalomcenter.org>

Do We Need to ReName God? Read More »

The Price of Scoring Big

By Rabbi Mark Borovitz

On Christmas Day, Harriet and I went to the movies, imagine that! We saw the movie “Wolf of Wall Street.” It was 3 hours of everything that is wrong with our country, our times and our lives. It is based on a true story and I was terribly upset and uncomfortable throughout the rest of the day. I went home and couldn’t shake this terrible feeling. I have figured out parts of what was bothering me.

1) I understood and, on a much smaller scale, lived Jordan’s life. A life of taking from others with no regard for them. A life of caring only about “winning” and “where’s mine.” A life of debauchery and harm to all I came into contact with. A life of abandoning those close to me and putting them through emotional hostage taking. In this regard, I was disgusted with myself and thankful that I have redeemed my life.
2) Listening to the audience laugh at the harm brought about by Jordan and his band of thieves. Listening to the disconnect of the audience with their part in creating Jordan(s). Knowing the audience didn’t acknowledge their own inner Jordan. Listening to the audience, knowing what the “too big to fail banks” have done to us all for years with similar types of “business,” so much so that the financial crisis of 2008 happened. Knowing that taking no responsibility is the “NEW AMERICAN WAY.” While the audience didn’t think what I am thinking, I see this type of attitude everyday in our government, in trying to raise money to help those in need and in dealing with people who can’t figure out why they are not HAPPY!
3) There is no redemption in this movie at all. Jordan was completely cool being a scumbag and continuing to be this way, even after his prison time. The screenwriter said in a New York Times review that he didn’t want to clean Jordan up when there was no redemption in the book that Jordan wrote. We are left knowing that Jordan did all these terrible things, hurt other people, took advantage of their weaknesses/vulnerabilities, left his wife and children(way before the divorce), did 20 months in Federal Prison, got everyone else indicted, and did less time than someone found with ONE ROCK of crack cocaine for their personal use! We also know that no one from the “too big to fail” banks has done a day in prison for their crimes against the weak and the vulnerable. The message is: if you steal big enough and you have enough power, information, people to roll on, or cash stashed away, you are immune to any real consequences—unless you are Bernie Madoff.
4) Finally, what is most upsetting to me—this movie got made. WHY? The acting is good, no doubt. Martin Scorsese is excellent. Yet, there is no redemption, no real “fall from grace,” no acceptance of responsibility. My big fear is that people will be entertained by scumbag actions, become more desensitized to the harms we bring to others and Redemption will be looked down upon as weakness and something to be made fun of.

I am Addicted to Redemption because I can’t live a life of “where’s mine,” a life of not caring about others, a life of using the vulnerabilities of others against them. Been there, done that. I am asking everyone to look for the inner Jordan and stop him. I am asking all of us to continue to stop evil in its tracks. I am asking everyone to be responsible for their neighbor, the poor, the widow, the stranger and the orphan. I am asking you all to join me on this Revolutionary Road to Redemption.

The Price of Scoring Big Read More »

Russia says Arafat died of natural causes

Russia said on Thursday former Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat died of natural causes, not radiation poisoning, but a Palestinian official called the finding “politicized” and said an investigation would continue.

Samples were taken from Arafat's body last year by Swiss, French and Russian forensics experts after an al Jazeera documentary said his clothes showed high amounts of deadly polonium 210.

The Swiss said last month their tests were consistent with polonium poisoning but not absolute proof of the cause of death. The Russian finding was in line with that of French scientists who said earlier this month that Arafat had not been killed with polonium.

“Yasser Arafat died not from the effects of radiation but of natural causes,” Vladimir Uiba, head of Russia's state forensics body, the Federal Medico-Biological Agency, was quoted as saying by the Interfax news agency.

Arafat, who signed the 1993 Oslo interim peace accords with Israel but then led an uprising in 2000, died at 75 at the Percy hospital in Paris in 2004, four weeks after falling ill in his Ramallah compound, which was surrounded by Israeli tanks.

“Like the French report on his death, this is a politicized finding. The truth lies at the Percy hospital,” Wasel Abu Yousef, a senior member of the Palestine Liberation Organisation, told Reuters.

The official cause of death was a stroke, but French doctors said at the time they were unable to determine the origin of Arafat's illness. No autopsy was carried out.

His widow, Suha Arafat, has argued the death was a political assassination by someone close to her husband. Many Palestinians believe Israel killed him – a charge Israel denies.

The Palestinian ambassador to Moscow, Faed Mustafa, said the Russian findings would not halt efforts to investigate the cause of death, state-run Russian news agency RIA reported.

“I can only say that there is already a decision to continue (investigating),” RIA quoted him as saying. “We respect their position and we highly value their work, but there is a decision to continue work.”

(Additional reporting by Ali Sawafta in Ramallah; editing by Andrew Roche)

Russia says Arafat died of natural causes Read More »

Israel plans 1,400 more West Bank settlement homes, official says

Israel plans to build 1,400 homes in its settlements in the occupied West Bank and will announce the projects next week after releasing a group of Palestinian prisoners, an Israeli official said on Friday.

The Palestinians have said any further expansion of Israeli settlements on land they seek for a state could derail U.S.-brokered peace talks that resumed in July after a three-year break and are set to last until April.

The United States said Israel had informed it of plans to release the group of prisoners on December 30, a day later than expected.

The release of about two dozen Palestinians, the third group to be freed since the peace talks resumed, is seen by the United States as a vital confidence-building measure.

“Although we had expected the release to occur on December 29, we have been informed that technical issues made it necessary to do the release a day later,” State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said in a statement.

The Israeli government official said about 600 homes would be announced in Ramat Shlomo, a settlement of mainly Ultra-Orthodox Jews located in an area of the West Bank that Israel annexed to Jerusalem in a move unrecognized internationally.

Another 800 would be built in other West Bank settlements which Israel also plans to keep in any future peace deal, though the list was not yet finalized, the official – who spoke on condition of anonymity – said.

Palestinian chief negotiator Saeb Erekat said the move would “destroy the peace process” and could be met with retaliation.

“We in the Palestinian leadership would immediately present our application for membership in 63 international organizations, among them the International Criminal Court,” the al-Quds newspaper quoted Erekat as saying on Friday.

An Israeli official had said on Wednesday that there were plans to announce more construction in Jewish settlements, but gave no figure for the number of new homes.

Palestinians see the settlements as an obstacle to achieving a viable state in East Jerusalem, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, territories Israel captured in the 1967 Middle East war. Most countries consider Israel's settlements there illegal.

The Palestinians won an upgrade to their U.N. status in 2012 from “entity” to “non-member state” in a vote perceived as a de facto recognition of statehood and have threatened to join the International Criminal Court to confront Israel there.

Earlier this year, however, the Palestinians agreed to suspend any actions at the United Nations in exchange for the release of scores of Palestinians in Israeli jails.

Israel agreed to release 104 long-serving Palestinian inmates convicted of killing Israelis at least 20 years ago as part of the package worked out by Washington to resume talks.

A previous round of negotiations broke down in 2010 in a dispute over settlement construction and since their revival this year, peace talks have shown little sign of progress.

(Additional reporting by Ali Sawafta and Noah Browning in Ramallah; Writing by Maayan Lubell; Editing by John Stonestreet/Ruth Pitchford, Chizu Nomiyama)

Israel plans 1,400 more West Bank settlement homes, official says Read More »

France may ban black comedian for anti-Semitic jibes

France is considering banning performances by a black comedian whose shows have repeatedly insulted the memory of Holocaust victims and could threaten public order, Interior Minister Manuel Valls said on Friday.

He said his ministry is studying legal ways to ban shows by Dieudonne M'bala M'bala, a comedian repeatedly fined for hate speech who ran in the 2009 European Parliament elections at the head of an “Anti-Zionist List” including far-right activists.

Valls announced the move after Jewish groups complained to President Francois Hollande about Dieudonne's trademark straight-arm gesture, which they call a “Nazi salute in reverse” and link to a growing frequency of anti-Semitic remarks and acts in France.

“Dieudonne M'bala M'bala doesn't seem to recognize any limits any more,” Valls said in a statement announcing the legal review aimed at banning his public appearances.

“From one comment to the next, as he has shown in several television shows, he attacks the memory of Holocaust victims in an obvious and unbearable way,” he said.

France has Europe's largest Jewish minority, estimated at about 600,000, but also sees a steady emigration to Israel of Jews who say they no longer feel safe here.

In the worst recent anti-Semitic incident, a French Islamist killed a rabbi and three pupils at a Jewish school last year in the southwestern French city of Toulouse.

GESTURE GOES VIRAL

Dieudonne, as he is known on stage, has responded to the criticism from prominent Jewish figures by threatening to sue them for linking his gesture – a downward straight arm touched at the shoulder by the opposite hand – to the Hitler salute.

He calls the gesture “la quenelle” – the word for an elongated creamed fish dumpling – and says it stands for his anti-Zionist and anti-establishment views, not anti-Semitism.

The gesture has gone viral on social media recently, with mostly young fans displaying it at parties and sports events. Some do it while in the audience at live television shows.

Two soldiers were sanctioned by the army in September for making the gesture in uniform in front of a Paris synagogue.

“It's the Nazi salute in reverse,” Roger Cukierman, head of the CRIF umbrella group of Jewish organizations, said after complaining about it to Hollande last week.

“Very clearly, Mr Dieudonne is developing a nearly professional anti-Semitism under the cover of telling jokes.”

Dieudonne, 46, Paris-born son of a Cameroonian father and French mother, began his comedy career with a Jewish sidekick in the early 1990s and appeared in several films.

Originally active with anti-racist left-wing groups, he began openly criticizing Jews and Israel in 2002 and ran in the European elections two years later with a pro-Palestinian party.

He has been fined several times in France for defaming Jews. Police broke up his one-man-show in a Brussels theatre last year for suspected anti-Semitic hate speech, but he was not convicted.

When Radio France's Patrick Cohen asked on air last week if the media should pay so much attention to him, Dieudonne suggested the journalist should get ready to emigrate.

“When I hear Patrick Cohen speaking, I say to myself, you see, the gas chambers … too bad,” he said.

(Additional reporting by Yves Clarisse; editing by Geert De Clercq and Mark Trevelyan)

France may ban black comedian for anti-Semitic jibes Read More »