This week from Israel
Back to Turkey
Antalya and other Turkish cities have always been a favorite vacation destination for Israelis. In the past year or so, there has been a significant reducing in Israeli tourism to Turkey, do to some unfortunate diplomatic incidents between the two countries and a few unpleasant statements made by Turkish Prime Minister, Erdoğan, which lead to a cool-down in the Israeli-Turkish relationship . Now, it appears that all is back to normal: figures released by the Turkish Statistical Institute point to a 157% increase in the number of Israelis who spent their summer vacation in the “club land” in August.
Read more “> here.
New therapy in brain cancer may make a difference
Each year, approximately 22,000 people in the United States are diagnosed with a potentially life-threatening brain tumor, Glioblastoma, and only about 10 percent of them live five years or longer after diagnosis. A recent Israeli discovery of a cancer-driving protein could lead to a new weapon in fighting this deadly disease.
Read more “>here.
Natalie Portman is back home
Jerusalem-born Oscar winner Natalie Portman is currently staying in Israel, working on her directorial debut. Portman will direct and star in a film adaptation of an autobiographical novel by Israeli author Amos Oz. The film, “A Tale of Love and Darkness,” will be filmed in Jerusalem.
Read more “>here.
A simpler way to learn Hebrew
A new Israeli startup provides Hebrew learners worldwide a simpler, friendlier way to learn Hebrew. Lingua.ly is a website which teaches Hebrew, alongside other languages, by using quizzes, voice-overs, practice exercises, games, and constant reinforcement.
Nursing video became more popular than expected
They call us “the Zionist devil,” and spent many years trying to kill as many Israelis as possible, but turns out we can also do good for the Arab countries surrounding us. Breastfeeding training videos in Arabic by Clalit Health Services, an Israeli health maintenance organization, are gaining tremendous popularity in Arab countries.
Where does the international humanitarian aid to PA go?
This week I encountered this very disturbing video that shows that the Palestinian Authority, which receives more humanitarian aid per-capita more than any other place in the world, uses the money for all the wrong purposes.
October 7, 2013
The US
Headline: Kerry Praises Syria’s Compliance
To Read: Michael Hirsh examines what he believes was President Obama's missed opportunity to get things right in Syria at the Geneva convention in summer 2012-
According to some officials involved, perhaps the greatest tragedy of Syria is that, some 80,000 lives ago, President Obama might have had within his grasp a workable plan to end the violence, one that is far less possible now. But amid the politics of the 2012 presidential election—when GOP nominee Mitt Romney regularly accused Obama of being “soft”—the administration did little to make it work and simply took a hard line against Assad, angering the special U.N. Syria envoy, Kofi Annan, and prompting the former U.N. secretary-general to quit, according to several officials involved.
Quote: “These operations in Libya and Somalia send a strong message to the world that the United States will spare no effort to hold terrorists accountable, no matter where they hide or how long they evade justice”, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel commenting on the capture of the bombing suspect in Libya.
Number: 350,000, most of the Pentagon's 350,000 furloughed workers have been called back to work.
Israel
Headline: Rabbi Yosef in critical condition
To Read: Jeremy Ben Ami discusses the misconceptions that lead people to assume that a one-state solution is possible-
It's easy to see why this idea has some superficial attraction, especially for American liberals who have become used to lauding the development in our own nation of an increasingly multiethnic, multicultural society. If we all manage to get along here in the United States, surely Israelis and Palestinians could get along just fine in some imaginary singular state — call it “Israelistine.”
Political scientists even have their own word for such an arrangement — “consociationalism.” It borrows heavily from the positive experience of solving the conflict in Northern Ireland. They imagine Israelis and Palestinians abandoning their deep-rooted yearning to control their own destinies in favor of an arrangement in which each would respect the other side's identity and ethos, including linguistic diversity, culture and religion.
Unfortunately, this concept has no connection to reality in today's Middle East.
Quote: 'He doesn't know we wear jeans, how can he know that Iran is developing nuclear weapons?', one of many Iranian tweets making fun of Netanyahu's remarks about jeans in Iran.
Number: 16/1, the chances of Amos Oz getting the Nobel Prize in Literature, according to gambling giant LadBrokes.
The Middle East
Headline: Egypt war anniversary erupts in violence
To Read: Is the Muslim Brotherhood dying? Hussein Ibish muses on the matter-
This may not be the end of the Muslim Brotherhood but its region-wide crisis is so severe that significant ideological and practical adaptation will be unavoidable for those flexible enough to learn any lessons. The Moroccan and Tunisian branches are already unhappily compromising to survive.
But the Muslim Brotherhood may be dying at least in the sense that what ultimately emerges from the current wreckage will be unrecognisably different. Only a radical change in fortunes across the region is likely to forestall such a process.
So during the very period in which many Arabs and westerners alike expected Brotherhood domination in many Arab countries, we may instead be witnessing the death throes of a nearly 100-year-old failed experiment.
Quote: “We haven’t had border security problems in Nusaybin so far but in that area it’s extremely easy for people to cross illegally. It’s almost like there is no border”, a Turkish Government official commenting on Turkey's decision to build a wall on a small stretch of the Turkish-Syrian border to avoid immigration.
Number: 15,000, the number of personnel which will help organize pedestrian flow in this year's Hajj festivities in Mecca.
The Jewish World
Headline: In strategy shift, Women of the Wall seek egalitarian prayer area
To Read: Daniel Trilling writes about The British Daily Mail's controversial attack on the father of both of Britain's most senior Jewish politicians, Ralph Miliband–
Britain’s own history of anti-Semitism is something conveniently obscured by its heroic self-image of being the country that defeated Hitler. Yet that anti-Semitism existed, and its traces are still discernible today, even if it largely remains beneath the surface of polite society. The Mail would no doubt aver that it was attacking Ralph Miliband’s Marxist politics, and not his ethnic origins. But the message of that piece was that those politics were not merely objectionable; they were deeply sinister because they were foreign and did not belong here. The subtext, further reinforced by the way the paper worded its refusal to apologise for running the piece, is that there’s something foreign about Ed Miliband himself. Never openly said, of course, but a series of snide digs that say—watch it, Ed, you’ll never be fully British and don’t you forget it.
Quote: “When it comes to anti-Semitism, I, as a practicing Jew in the orthodox tradition, regard myself as something of an expert with very sensitive antennae”, Daily Mail editor Alex Brummer denying the allegations of Anti-Semitism the paper faces after the controversial Miliband story mentioned above.
Number: 500, the number of Russian Jews who participated in a conference held in Odessa about Israel's national poet Bialik.
Catholic doctrine and Justice Scalia
Maybe it's because my twitter feed is filled with religion writers, law geeks and policy wonks, but it's seems like everyone this morning is talking about Justice Antonin Scalia's “>contributed to GetReligion: The media has a very poor understanding of religion.
An example for the Scalia interview:
You believe in heaven and hell?
Oh, of course I do. Don’t you believe in heaven and hell?No.
Oh, my.Does that mean I’m not going?
[Laughing.] Unfortunately not!Wait, to heaven or hell?
It doesn’t mean you’re not going to hell, just because you don’t believe in it. That’s Catholic doctrine! Everyone is going one place or the other.But you don’t have to be a Catholic to get into heaven? Or believe in it?
Of course not!Oh. So you don’t know where I’m going. Thank God.
I don’t know where you’re going. I don’t even know whether Judas Iscariot is in hell. I mean, that’s what the pope meant when he said, “Who am I to judge?” He may have recanted and had severe penance just before he died. Who knows?Can we talk about your drafting process—
[Leans in, stage-whispers.] I even believe in the Devil.You do?
Of course! Yeah, he’s a real person. Hey, c’mon, that’s standard Catholic doctrine! Every Catholic believes that.
Now, no reporter can be an expert on every religion. I wouldn't even expect an ace writer on the religion beat (to the extent it still exists, which is sort of myth) to know the name of every religion. But if you're going to interview one of the better-known American Catholics, and especially if you plan on asking questions about how his religious beliefs inform his jurisprudence, you should bone up on the basics.
And that's all this is. The basics. There is no tricky question of dogma in Scalia's statements on heaven and hell and the devil. We could break the misconceptions here down line by line, but I don't want to insult you, good reader.
Even Scalia's statements on Pope Francis (“He's the Vicar of Christ. I don't run down the pope.”) and the pontiff's statements that the Catholic Church should “>liberal leanings of this pope, was that Pope Francis said it at all. The only real unusual thing about the pope's statement was that he questioned “Who am I to judge?”–the same thing Scalia said to Senior about who's getting into heaven and hell.
Don't get me wrong. This is a fascinating interview with tons of valuable nuggets on Scalia's entertainment interests, on his judicial philosophy, on his relationship with his clerks, on his style on the bench, on his suspicion that he has some gay friends. But the nexus between religion and jurisprudence comes up terribly thing–breezy, even–because the conversation gets bogged down on the basics of Catholicism.
Catholic doctrine and Justice Scalia Read More »
Grenades fired in Cairo, troops killed near Suez Canal after protesters die
Suspected militants killed six Egyptian soldiers near the Suez Canal and fired rocket-propelled grenades at a state satellite station in Cairo on Monday, suggesting an Islamist insurgency was gathering pace three months after an army takeover.
Dozens of supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood were killed in clashes with security forces and political opponents on Sunday, one of the bloodiest days since the military deposed Islamist President Mohamed Mursi in July.
The death toll from that day's violence across the country rose to 53, state media said, with 271 people wounded.
The Brotherhood denies the military's charges that it incites violence and says it has nothing to do with militant activity, but further confrontations may shake Egypt this week, with Mursi's supporters calling protests for Tuesday and Friday.
They are likely to be angered by the publication of an interview with Egypt's army chief on Monday in which he said he told Mursi as long ago as February he had failed as president.
Sunday's clashes took place on the anniversary of the 1973 war with Israel — meant to have been a day of national celebration. The countries signed a peace agreement in 1979.
Authorities had warned that anyone protesting against the army during the anniversary would be regarded as an agent of foreign powers, not an activist – a hardening of language that suggested authorities would take a tougher line.
The Muslim Brotherhood accused the army of staging a coup and working with security forces to eliminate the group through violence and arrests, allegations the military denies.
Sinai-based militants have stepped up attacks on the security forces since the army takeover and assaults like that in Cairo's Maadi suburb fuel fears of an Islamist insurgency like one in the 1990s crushed by then President Hosni Mubarak.
Two people were wounded in the attack on the state-owned satellite station while medical sources said three were killed and 48 injured in a blast near a state security building in South Sinai. A witness said it was caused by a car bomb.
“Unidentified people opened fire on a satellite receiver station in the neighborhood of Maadi in Cairo,” the Ministry of Interior said in a statement. Security sources said assailants fired two rocket-propelled grenades at the site.
Security sources said gunmen opened fire on the soldiers in Ismailia while they were sitting in a car at a checkpoint near the city on the Canal, a vital global trade route.
TOURISM HIT
Traffic flowed freely in the centre of Cairo where Sunday's clashes had taken place and state radio said security forces were in control of the country.
But attacks in Cairo like Monday's on the satellite station could do further damage to Egypt's vital tourism industry.
David Hartwell, a Middle East analyst at IHS Jane's, said more explosive devices seemed to be being used in the capital.
“It suggests that Sinai groups are infiltrating in greater numbers in to northern Egypt,” he said. “Either these groups are expanding out of Sinai, he said, “or the capabilities that they have is being used by other groups that may or not be affiliated with the Brotherhood.”
Army chief General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, who has promised a political roadmap that would lead Egypt to free and fair elections, said in the interview published on Monday that Egypt's interests differed from those of the Brotherhood.
“I told Mursi in February you failed and your project is finished,” privately-owned newspaper al-Masry al-Youm quoted Sisi as saying.
Militant attacks, including a failed assassination attempt on the interior minister in Cairo in September, are deepening uncertainty in Egypt along with the power struggle between the Brotherhood and the army-backed government.
Neither side seems willing to pursue reconciliation, raising the possibility of protracted tensions in U.S. ally Egypt.
Almost daily attacks by al Qaeda-inspired militants in the Sinai have killed more than 100 members of the security forces since early July, the army spokesman said on September 15.
Security forces smashed pro-Mursi protest camps in Cairo on August 14, killing hundreds of people. In an ensuing crackdown, many Muslim Brotherhood leaders were arrested in an attempt to decapitate Egypt's oldest Islamist movement.
The Brotherhood, which had proven highly resilient after previous crackdowns, has embarked on a strategy of staging smaller protests to avoid action by security forces.
Sisi denied Brotherhood allegations that the army had intended to remove Mursi through a coup, saying it had only responded to the will of the people.
Before Mursi's overthrow, Egyptians disillusioned with his year-long rule had held huge rallies demanding that he quit.
Last month, a court banned the Brotherhood and froze its assets, pushing the group, which had dominated elections held in Egypt after Mubarak's fall in 2011, further into the cold.
Additional reporting by Yasmine Saleh and Maggie Fick; Writing by Michael Georgy
Grenades fired in Cairo, troops killed near Suez Canal after protesters die Read More »
And forgive our “stubborn pride”–the Senate Chaplain amid the shutdown
As the government shutdown enters its second week, Senate Chaplain Barry C. Black has been speaking truth in his opening prayers. Two recent requests, directed at the 100 men and women who fill the Senate chambers, via the “>Too bad he's not the House chaplain.
And forgive our “stubborn pride”–the Senate Chaplain amid the shutdown Read More »
Women of the Wall agrees to pray in egalitarian space, with conditions
Women of the Wall agreed in principle to pray in a new egalitarian space adjacent to the Western Wall Plaza, provided the space meets several conditions regarding design and management.
Until those conditions are met, Women of the Wall said in a statement Monday that it will continue praying at the women’s section of the Western Wall, as the group has for 25 years.
Before now, though, the group had said a new egalitarian section of the wall would not be “relevant” to its needs.
Monday’s policy change brings Women of the Wall in line with other non-Orthodox groups in Israel, such as the Conservative and Reform movements, which saw the new section as an answer to their requests for pluralism at the holy site. Yizhar Hess, CEO of the Conservative movement in Israel, called the change “a very positive step.”
The egalitarian section, to be located in an area adjacent to the plaza known as Robinson’s Arch, was first proposed in April as part of a plan by Jewish Agency for Israel Chairman Natan Sharansky to resolve religious conflict at the wall. Sharansky, along with Knesset Cabinet secretary Avichai Mandelblit, is due to release the full plan in the coming weeks.
Women of the Wall meets at the beginning of each Jewish month for a women’s service at the Western Wall. Its chairwoman, Anat Hoffman, told JTA that the policy change will give Women of the Wall more influence over how the new section is designed.
“For an organization that’s always been small and very dedicated, we are now going to become players at the political table, which means we’ll have to compromise on our demands,” she said. “Pure ideology does not reality make.”
The group’s new policy, however, will not lead to a change on the ground in the near future. In order to pray in the new section, Women of the Wall is demanding that the section be equal to the existing plaza in size, topography, budget and facilities. In addition, the group is demanding a unified entrance and a shared plaza between all of the wall’s sections.
Women of the Wall also is demanding that a body of Jewish leaders, with equal women’s representation, runs the new section. The existing plaza is managed by the Western Wall Heritage Foundation, a haredi Orthodox organization.
Some of the changes may be difficult to implement. Altering the topography of the plaza would require approval from the Islamic Wakf, the body that controls the Temple Mount and historically has been resistant to any such changes. Israeli Economy Minister Naftali Bennett had a temporary platform erected at Robinson’s Arch in August, but Women of the Wall said it does not meet their needs.
Until Monday, Women of the Wall seemed defiant in its commitment to keep praying in the women’s section. The group scored a legal victory in court this year that allowed its members to pray without fear of arrest, but members have faced ongoing opposition and harassment from traditionalist opponents.
The group’s most recent service, on Friday, was the calmest in months, but the women still encountered opponents screaming and, according to some reports, spitting as they prayed.
“We had a choice,” Hoffman told JTA — “to continue being marginalized and insist that we pray at the women’s section, or to say here’s how we envision the Western Wall, open to all and friendly and clean.”
Women of the Wall agrees to pray in egalitarian space, with conditions Read More »
Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, founder of Shas and Sephardic sage, dies at 93
Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, the Israeli sage who founded the Sephardic Orthodox Shas political party and exercised major influence on Jewish law, has died.
Yosef died Monday at Hadassah Ein Kerem Hospital in Jerusalem. He was 93.
He served as Israel’s Sephardic chief rabbi from 1973 to 1983, and extended his influence over the ensuing decades as the spiritual leader of Shas, which politically galvanized hundreds of thousands of Sephardic Israelis, though Yosef himself never served in Knesset. In 1999, at its height, Shas was the third-largest Knesset party, with 17 seats.
Though he adhered to a haredi Orthodox ideology, Yosef, a charismatic speaker, published relatively liberal Jewish legal rulings and drew support both from traditional and secular Sephardic Israelis. Known to his followers as Maran, “our master” in Hebrew, Yosef’s main Jewish legal goal was to take diverse Jewish practices from the Middle East and North Africa and mold a “united legal system” for Sephardic Jews.
As his influence grew, Yosef presided over a veritable empire of Sephardi religious services. Shas opened a network of schools that now has 40,000 students. Yosef managed a kosher certification called Beit Yosef that has become the standard for many religious Sephardim. And he was a dominant power broker when it came to electing Sephardic chief rabbis and appointing Sephardic judges in religious courts. This year, Yosef’s son — and preferred candidate — won the Israeli Sephardic chief rabbi election.
Through his work, Yosef hoped to raise the status of Israel’s historically disadvantaged Sephardic community, both culturally and socioeconomically. He dressed in traditional Sephardic religious garb, including a turban and an embroidered robe, even as most of his close followers adopted the Ashkenazi haredi dress of a black fedora and suit.
As a scholar, Yosef was known for his ability to recite long, complex Jewish tracts from memory. His best-known works, “Yabia Omer,” “Yehave Da’at” and “Yalkut Yosef,” cover an array of Jewish legal topics.
“He was a character that people capitulated in front of, a man of Jewish law that created a political entity with strong influence on Israeli politics and culture,” said Menachem Friedman, an expert on the haredi community at Bar-Ilan University. “It raised up Middle Eastern Jewish culture, gave legitimacy to Middle Eastern Jewish traditions.”
Outside the religious community, Yosef was best known for his sometimes controversial political stances. His authority within Shas was virtually absolute, and even in his ninth decade he remained closely involved in the party’s decisions.
While Yosef favored policies that served the religious community’s interests, he also supported peace treaties involving Israeli withdrawal from conquered territory. He argued that such deals were allowed under Jewish law because they saved Jewish lives.
In the 1990s and 2000s, Shas joined left-wing governing coalitions multiple times, allowing for the advancement of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process — though Yosef opposed the 2005 Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip because it was done unilaterally.
In his later years, Yosef also stirred controversy with a number of inflammatory statements, often made at a weekly Saturday-night sermon. In 2000, he said that Holocaust victims were reincarnated sinners, and in 2005 he said that the victims of Hurricane Katrina deserved the tragedy “because they have no God.” In 2010, Yosef said, “The sole purpose of non-Jews is to serve Jews.”
“Rabbi Ovadia was a giant in Torah and Jewish law and a teacher for tens of thousands,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement Monday. “He worked greatly to enhance Jewish heritage and at the same time, his rulings took into consideration the times and the realities of renewed life in the State of Israel. He was imbued with love of the Torah and the people.”
Ovadia Yosef was born Abdullah Yosef in Baghdad, Iraq, on Sept. 23, 1920. Four years later his family moved to Jerusalem, in what was then Palestine, where Yosef studied at the Porat Yosef yeshiva, a well-regarded Sephardic school. At 20, he received ordination as a rabbinic judge, and at 24 he married Margalit Fattal. She died in 1994.
Yosef began serving as a rabbinic judge in 1944, and in 1947 moved to Cairo to head the rabbinic court in the Egyptian capital, returning in 1950. He continued serving as a religious judge until becoming Sephardic chief rabbi of Tel Aviv in 1968, a position he held until he was elected Sephardic chief rabbi of Israel in 1973. During that period, he began publishing his well-known works, beginning with his Passover Haggadah, “Hazon Ovadia,” in 1952. In 1970, the government awarded him the prestigious Israel Prize in recognition of his books.
Yosef defeated a sitting chief rabbi in the 1973 election, itself a controversial move. In the wake of the Yom Kippur War that year, he ruled that women whose husbands were missing in action could remarry. Later in his term, he endorsed the Ethiopian Jews’ claim to Judaism, helping them immigrate to Israel under the Law of Return.
Yosef founded Shas in 1984, one year after finishing his term as chief rabbi. The party now holds 11 Knesset seats.
Save for four years, Shas was part of every governing coalition between 1984 and 2013, acting as a kingmaker in Israeli politics. Because the party represents both haredi and poor Sephardim, it advocates a unique mix of dovish foreign policy, conservative religious policy and liberal economic policy. Yosef took an active role in shaping Shas through this year’s elections, heading a council of rabbis that chose the party’s slate and mediating leadership conflicts.
What was most impressive about Yosef, says Friedman, was his influence over almost every aspect of Sephardic religious and political life – making it unlikely that another rabbi will be able to take his place.
“He’ll create an empty space politically and an empty space religiously,” Friedman said. “He was a source of strength and great control in Middle Eastern Jewish religious society. I don’t know what will happen.”
Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, founder of Shas and Sephardic sage, dies at 93 Read More »
Engagement trends are negative, but Jewish funders see validation in Pew study
If you’re pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into Jewish identity building, what do you do when a survey comes along showing that the number of U.S. Jews engaging with Jewish life and religion is plummeting?
That’s the question facing major funders of American Jewish life following the release last week of the Pew Research Center’s survey on U.S. Jews.
The study — the first comprehensive portrait of American Jewry in more than a decade — showed that nearly one-third of Jews under age 32 do not identify as Jewish by religion, that American Jews are intermarrying at a rate of 58 percent (71 percent if the Orthodox are excluded) and that most intermarried Jews are not raising their kids as Jews.
For many of the Jewish world’s biggest funders, the answer to this question is clear: Stay the course.
“We’ve known about these issues and many of us have been working in our own ways to address them,” said Sandy Cardin, president of the Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation, which with more than $2 billion in assets is one of the Jewish world’s largest foundations focused on bolstering Jewish identity and community among young people.
“We haven’t done it yet, and by no means is success assured, but I do think as a community we have identified significant ways to address these challenges,” he told JTA. “It’s too soon, I think, to see the immediate impact of what many of us in the community have been doing over the past five to 10 years.”
The logic to this approach is relatively straightforward: The findings in the Pew survey mostly upheld the assumptions upon which major givers in Jewish life already have been operating. In their view, the survey validates their own philanthropic priorities — even if they disagree about what to prioritize.
“This new study reinforces the idea that we need an energizing nucleus which is literate in Hebrew, and which is engaged in intensive and immersive education and committed to Jewish life and Jewish institutions,” said Yossi Prager, executive director in North America of Avi Chai, a major investor in Jewish education.
Andres Spokoiny, CEO of the Jewish Funders Network, drew a different conclusion: “Those that were investing heavily in Jewish culture and alternative venues for Jewish identity were right,” he said.
“Given that a lot of Jews define themselves as secular or atheist, it’s critically important that while investing in traditional venues in Jewish life, it’s important to explore and find and foster venues for encouraging Jewish identity through non-traditional ways — through culture, through arts,” Spokoiny said. “I think that’s a key message.”
Mark Charendoff, president of the Maimonides Fund, said the study demonstrates a remarkable failure to achieve many of the central goals adopted by the Jewish community in the wake of the 1990 National Jewish Population Survey, which showed what many considered alarmingly high assimilation rates.
“As a community, we made a decision a couple of decades ago to focus on Jewish continuity and Jewish identity, and we don’t seem to have moved the needle by even one degree,” Charendoff told JTA. “I would love to tell you I think it’s a wakeup call, but I don’t think anyone’s waking up.”
Jewish foundations need to get on the same page to develop a comprehensive strategy to begin to reverse the negative trends, he said.
“Donors by and large are focused on particular efforts and not focused on the field as a whole,” Charendoff said. “There needs to be more coordination, more resources. We’re only going to have that impact if there’s alignment and not 10,000 people doing God’s work but without regard to what their neighbors are doing.”
Whether the Pew study will prompt a systemic response, or even an attempt at one by Jewish funders, remains to be seen.
Next month, the Jewish Federations of North America will convene its annual General Assembly, which draws fundraisers and leaders from federations throughout the United States. Jerry Silverman, the umbrella group’s CEO, told JTA that this year’s confab is not the place for beginning a communitywide conversation about the Pew study results.
This year’s G.A. will be held in Jerusalem and focus on the Israel-Diaspora relationship. The Pew study will not be on the agenda, he said.
“You really need to bring together thinkers and thought leaders who can really think this through. I don’t think that’s the G.A. population,” Silverman said. “That’s not the forum to think this through.”
Chip Edelsberg, the executive director of the Jim Joseph Foundation, which has awarded about $280 million in grants for Jewish education and engagement since 2006, said his foundation needs more time to delve into the Pew data to figure out what changes are necessary, if any, to their strategies for engaging young American Jews.
“It will certainly animate our discussions and have a bearing on the foundation’s decision making, because it is actually good data,” he said.
Michael Steinhardt, the mega-philanthropist behind Birthright Israel, Hebrew-language charter schools and a host of other Jewish community programs, said the results of Pew are hardly news: Separate community studies over the last few years have made the trends clear.
“We should not need the Pew study to give us a reality check,” he said. “The question is what to do about it.”
Steinhardt says he isn’t optimistic that the Jewish community will respond effectively.
“Nothing’s a galvanizing event for the Jewish community,” he said. “I don’t see the community thoughtfully dealing with it.”
Engagement trends are negative, but Jewish funders see validation in Pew study Read More »
The passing of a revolutionary rabbinical leader
A couple of years ago I wrote an article for Slate entitled will the great American rabbi please stand up? It was a controversial piece to which the response was not all positive. Here’s one paragraph from that long-forgotten article – one that I was reminded of when hearing the news on the passing of rabbi Ovadia Yosef:
This is a relatively new and perplexing phenomenon, and it's difficult to pinpoint why great American rabbis seem to be a thing of the past. Within Jewish tradition, the thesis of the “decline of the generations” (in Hebrew: Yeridat Ha'Dorot) is a very prevalent one, inversely related to the distance from Sinai. Is what we see in America today proof of this thesis (though not all great Jewish thinkers accept it)? Is it a problem with today's rabbis, students, and scholars? Are we in the early years of a drought in Jewish thought? Or maybe the problem is not the rabbis but rather the changing times and changing nature of Judaism, which makes it more difficult for anyone to acquire greatness.
Today I’m almost certain that the problem isn’t the rabbis – it’s us, the unworthy generation. Unworthy in the sense that to have great rabbis one needs to want to have great rabbis, to want an authority to which many people adhere, to want to really respect someone special.
Rabbi Ovadia Yosef was one such rabbi. Politics aside, rhetoric aside, misunderstandings and differences of culture aside, he was a giant- possibly the last of Israel’s giant rabbis. The last one to whom all other rabbis referred with respect, the last one whose greatness was commonly acknowledged, unchallenged. He was a successful revolutionary – always a tricky position- courageous enough to set precedents and to fight against foes, but also acceptable enough to the masses and established enough so as not to be shunned, marginalized, and destroyed by the anti-revolutionaries.
It isn’t easy to explain to non-Israelis what was so unique about Rabbi Ovadia Yosef. Today at the office, I asked my colleague Dr. Shlomo Fischer – a true expert on Yosef and his party, Shas – to try and define for me in a paragraph why Yosef was so important. Fischer told me the story of Yosef’s first demonstration of courageous independence: It was when he was the chief rabbi of Tel Aviv, and when the rabbinate was still totally loyal to Ashkenazi custom. Ashkenazi Jews don’t register people for marriage between the fast of the seventeen of Tamuz and until after Tisha B’Av. Rabbi Yosef saw no reason why he should follow this habit, and ordered Sephardic rabbis to keep registering people until the first day of the month of Av – according to Sephardic custom.
This was a small change, Fischer told me, but symbolic of much greater changes to come. Yosef’s greatest achievement was to release Sephardic custom from Ashkenazi rabbinical tyranny. He did this by issuing halachic decisions such as this one – and later by forming a religious Sephardic party, Shas, that became a political powerhouse.
Shas is also Yosef’s most controversial creation. It made him a villain in the eyes of many Israelis. It made him a divisive figure. Indeed, Rabbi Yosef didn’t always mince words, and didn’t usually hide his low opinion of many of Israel’s political leaders. Yet make no mistake: He was a revolutionary also in his treatment of the Jewish state. A notable case: his bold insistence on releasing the “agunot” – the 'chained' women of the missing soldiers of the Yom Kippur war, who could not remarry. “Rabbi Yosef was called upon to deal with one of his greatest legal, dramatic and humanitarian issues, and by definition one of his toughest Israeli assignments,” journalist Adam Baruch wrote years later. “His halachic work on the matter of the agunot was a humane example and a halachic example; an undertaking that reverberated deeply in Israeli society as a whole”.
He was also the one to insist that giving land in exchange for peace was permissible, that territorial compromise is halachically allowed should it lead to the saving of lives. Some observers from the right have interpreted his ruling as being a sign of him a leader of the Haredi and Diasporic flock. That’s not necessarily true: it can be seen as a testimony to Yosef’s pragmatism, and his insistence to weigh options and to choose the lesser of two evils (or the better of two good things).
There has been a lot of talk in the past few days about the question of his heir apparent. Will it be one of Yosef’s sons, or maybe Rabbi Shlomo Amar? The thing about this question is that if we even need to ask it, this means that there is no heir. There is no one that is acceptable to everybody, no one that has the combination of knowledge, leadership skills, popularity, and courage to needed be a leader like rabbi Yosef. People might tell you that they want a successor for Rabbi Yosef to somehow emerge. But in fact, they’d probably do everything in their power to prevent such a successor from having any chance to rise above the wannabes.
The passing of a revolutionary rabbinical leader Read More »
Oscars and the OC
Fall pilots are still airing all around us but Hollywood is already looking ahead to seasons future: on Friday it was announced that FOX will be developing a pilot based on Oscar winner Diablo Cody's script Prodigy, about a teen genuis who (surprise!) has been socially isolated until she heads to public school and falls in with a bad crowd. I'd be super skeptical– I have, historically, hated Cody's work, Oscars and the OC Read More »