fbpx

June 12, 2013

Woman of the pomegranate

Sharon Nazarian has a mysterious quality about her. I’ve bumped into her occasionally over the years, but never long enough to have a real conversation. I always knew she was highly educated and a big lover of Israel, and that a few years ago she founded the groundbreaking Nazarian Center for Israel Studies at UCLA, where she also teaches political science.

But after spending a couple of hours with her recently in her elegant Century City offices, and following it up with a phone conversation, I still felt a sense of mystery.

Nazarian, who was born in Tehran and looks like she’s in her mid-40s, is not loud and slick. She dresses tastefully, sips her jasmine tea and softly measures her words. She’s not out to sell or impress.

Maybe part of her mystery is how she waxes poetically about a visual icon that adorns the family seal of the Y&S Nazarian Family Foundation, which is named after her parents Younes and Soraya, and which she runs as president.

Normally, visual icons for nonprofits pull at the heartstrings, typically with graphic symbols of people in need, or, in the case of Jewish causes, something with the Star of David. Not in this case. Here, the symbol for Nazarian’s foundation is an ancient fruit.

A pomegranate.

What could this odd fruit have to do with enriching education about Israel, a prime mission of the foundation?

It’s not just the popular myth that the pomegranate is said to carry the same amount of seeds as the number of commandments: 613. The answer is not that linear, or quantitative. 

“In the Persian tradition, the pomegranate has special powers,” she told me. “It’s a mystical thing. Some scholars even believe that it was the forbidden fruit in the Garden of Eden.”

Nazarian, who has a doctorate in philosophy, wants to harness that special power to the field of Israel education.

She herself thinks in circular, not linear ways. This is a reflection of her intellectual curiosity and her holistic approach to learning. She wants to cover Israel from every possible angle.

Her center, under the leadership of Israel scholar Arieh Saposnik, sponsors courses through many UCLA departments on such topics as Israeli politics, law, economics, history and environmental policy. But the center also values the cultural texture of the Israel story, offering courses on media, performing arts and Hebrew language and literature.

When I researched the legend of the pomegranate, I learned that in ancient times it was revered as a symbol of health, fertility and rebirth.

It wouldn’t surprise me if Nazarian saw these three words as representing much of what she’s trying to do with her center.

First, there’s something healthy about the very notion of education, especially when so much of the discourse on Israel revolves around propaganda. She believes the best way to counter the anti-Israel bias that often infects the halls of academia is not with more bias but with intellectual depth.

This is where the second word — fertility — comes in.

In her mind, planting so many seeds about Israel will breed more interest in Israel, not less. By learning the rich story of Israel from many different angles, students will be less likely to fall for anti-Israel propaganda and more likely to want to engage with the Jewish state.

In fact, in recent years UCLA has had one the best records among universities for minimizing anti-Israel and anti-Jewish incidents on campus.

Perhaps as a reflection of this success, Nazarian’s center was chosen this year to host the 29th annual conference of the Association for Israel Studies (AIS), an international scholarly society devoted to the academic and professional study of Israel.

The three-day conference, which kicks off June 24 and features prominent scholars from around the world, will explore a theme especially relevant today: “Israel in the International Arena: Scholarship, Imagery, Discourse & Public Policy.” It promises to be anything but linear.

It’s the first time the prestigious conference will be held in California, which speaks to the third symbol of the pomegranate — rebirth.

Nazarian sees California, and especially UCLA, as an ideal place to lead a rebirth of the study of Israel in academia.

She’s challenging the view that improving Israel’s image is a hopeless cause and that the only way to defend Israel in a Twitter world is to fight back with clever slogans. Her approach is a deeper, richer and longer one — more like an extended voyage than a quick weekend trip.

Just as the Jewish people waited 1,900 years to return to the land of Zion, it will take more than 19 minutes to make the case for Israel.

Maybe that’s why she’s so moved by the symbol of the pomegranate — because it indeed represents something deep, complicated and timeless. You can’t crunch it right away. It takes a while to open the fruit, get to the seeds and then savor them.

But I see another possible reason for picking this ancient fruit. When you finally get to savor the pomegranate seeds, you realize that the taste reminds you of … Israel itself.

Slightly sweet, and slightly tart.

That might be the real mystery of Sharon Nazarian — how she will tell the bittersweet story of her beloved Israel, in a world that likes to see only the bitter or the sweet.


David Suissa is president of TRIBE Media Corp./Jewish Journal and can be reached at davids@jewishjournal.com.

Woman of the pomegranate Read More »

Six reasons why Superman is Jesus in ‘Man of Steel’

Last night I attended a press screening of the latest installment of the Superman franchise, “Man of Steel,” directed by Zack Snyder and produced by “Batman” director Christopher Nolan. 

An avid comic book fan, I expected one of two portrayals of Superman. 

Jewish or Jesus.

There’s been a fair amount of discourse on whether the superhero created by two Jews in the late 30s was in fact a Jew.  He’s an immigrant, he an outcast, he’s a golem, etc.  It’s no surprise that Jews love to call Superman Jewish. (You can read more about that theory ” target=”_blank”>here or  Six reasons why Superman is Jesus in ‘Man of Steel’ Read More »

My resilient father and the German engineer

At 85, my father is full of optimism and humor. You would never guess that at the age of sixteen he was a victim of the greatest atrocity of the 20th century. In the spring of 1944, he and his family were sent to Auschwitz. When they arrived, he was separated from his mother and two sisters. He and his father stood in line with the other men, eventually reaching SS officers who sent my father to the right and his father to the left. The next day, my father learned from a long-time prisoner that his father had surely been killed in a gas chamber.

My father was sent to a slave labor camp where he was forced to work on a railroad construction site. He spent most of his days carrying heavy steel rails up a hill, over and over again, from the first light of day until sunset.  By the end of the summer he found that it took more strength to keep going than he thought he might have. He saw his struggle to survive as a battle he was fighting with the SS. If he gave in, then the Nazis would win. He did not want to give them this victory. If he stayed alive, then he would win. He was also resolute about returning home to his family. He worried about what would happen if his mother and sisters came home and he didn’t. This concern got him up off the cold ground every morning with his mind set on making it through another day.

This ability to turn a threat into a challenge is at the heart of resilience, and research in psychology finds that one’s mental attitude in the face of adversity has a significant impact on physical and mental well being. Of course, a positive attitude was not nearly enough to survive a death camp, and many strong, resilient people perished in the Holocaust. Luck was necessary as well, and a lot of it. A helping hand was also essential. For my father, this help came from an unexpected source.

One morning during roll call an SS sergeant walked up to my father’s section and yelled, “Which one of you young inmates speaks German?” Acting purely on instinct, my father raised his hand high into the air. He followed the officer, and saw a man waiting for him in a long leather coat. He panicked. What have I gotten myself into? The man had the dark and neatly dressed look of a Gesta po officer, and my father was sure he had made a very bad decision.

The man introduced himself and said that he was a civilian engineer who needed an assistant for his work. He explained that his job was to conduct a survey for a new road through the forest, and he wanted someone to help carry the equipment. My father immediately understood that this job would be much easier than his usual daily toil.

During their second day of working together, the engineer said to my father, “I can see what a horrible situation you are in, and I want to do something to help you.” He went on to say that he couldn’t help him outright because of the SS guards, but that he could obtain some food for him. He explained that there was a barracks in the woods, where he ate his lunch with the SS officers, and where he had hidden some food in a corner, under a bench. The building would be empty in the late afternoon.

At the end of the day, as they neared the perimeter of the camp, the engineer indicated the barracks. The building was dark and empty, and my father hurried to the far corner and looked under the bench. Chicken! Rice! He took some bites of the food and put the rest in his pock ets to share with his friends in the camp.

For the two extraordinary weeks that he worked with the engineer, my father supplemented his daily intake of stale bread and watery soup with food from the SS kitchen. As the days passed, he grew sturdier. The boost to his well-being was more than physical: the fact that this German cared about him, and was willing to take great personal risks to feed him, restored some of my father’s faith in other people.

When he was a sixteen-year-old prisoner, he knew full well that being assigned to work with the engineer was a tremendous stroke of luck. But it took some time for him to realize just how pivotal a role his benefactor had played. Af ter my father was liberated and could better weigh the impact various events had had on his ability to survive, he credited him with saving his life.

On Father’s Day, I am thankful to the brave man who became a temporary father to a teenager in a desperate situation. Further, I am thankful to have such a strong, resilient father who somehow managed to emerge from that terrible darkness to live his life with generosity and love.

I have watched my father talk to audiences about his Ho locaust experiences many times. He holds up well dur ing these talks, even though the events he is speaking about are very distressing. As soon as he is done, he bounces back to his usual good humor and wants to discuss dinner plans.

In every speech my father gives, he tells the story of the civilian German engineer in the long leather coat. He speaks of the cattle cars, the cruelty of the SS officers and the murderous selections without flinching. Decades after their final walk in the forest, it is the kindness shown to him by one man that forces him to stop speaking, lower his eyes and weep.


Dr. Jill Klein earned a doctorate in social psychology from the University of Michigan and is currently a business professor at Melbourne Business School at the University of Melbourne. In We Got the Water, Dr. Klein shares her family’s harrowing experience as prisoners at Auschwitz concentration camp. We Got the Water (April 2013) is available at www.amazon.com. For more information, visit www.wegotthewater.com.

My resilient father and the German engineer Read More »

Picking a Path

By Jaclin Miller

One of the most repetitive questions that I’ve experienced throughout my life since I was a child is “What do you want to do with your life?” Some come from a concerned standpoint, others seem to be genuinely interested, and some I think are aiming to lift my anxiety through the roof. I mean, how many people do you know that have a profession that they dreamed about having their entire life? There may be some, true, but most adults I know today are in a working profession that does not necessarily make them happy, but provides a sufficient income, which is good enough for living in today’s society.

I, on the other hand, am aiming for happiness. Even though I am not that old, I have had my fair share of jobs. Retail, restaurants, administrative work—unfortunately none of them have sparked an interest in me. Does that mean I know what I want to do with my life? Absolutely not.  However, I am more knowledgeable in what I don’t want to do. I think too many of us settle. We settle in relationships and we settle in our profession. Why do we settle on things that do not necessarily make us happy? Is it because we are too lazy to go after something that might make us happy? Is it too much work and not enough time? Do too many of us fear the unknown? Why are we so content with settling?

As Psychologist Abraham Maslow suggested many years ago, we humans tend to be blind to all but our most immediate needs. When we’re young, and unable to support ourselves financially, we make our career decisions based upon money and little else. We don’t realize that our expectations of work will completely change once we satisfy our economic needs, and once we come to a realization that money isn’t everything.

So what would happen if we let go of the thought that work cannot be rewarding and meaningful? Once we admit to ourselves that it is possible then our lives could start to begin. Everyone’s life is too valuable to waste doing something uninspiring. Find something that inspires you and let go of your fears.

Picking a Path Read More »

Dying in vain in Santa Monica and Sandy Hook

This coming Friday, it will have been six months since a shooter armed with an assault rifle killed 26 people, including 20 children, at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. The same day also will mark one week since another gunman, using the same type of gun, killed five in a rampage that ended at Santa Monica College (SMC).

In recent months, despite the defeat of gun control legislation in the Senate, some have suggested that Newtown fundamentally changed the politics of gun control in this country. And yet, the shooting in Santa Monica appeared to go almost entirely unnoticed, barely being mentioned in the public conversation.

“This incident is not getting the attention that some of the other shootings have had,” Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Beverly Hills), whose district includes the entire city of Santa Monica, told me on Wednesday. “I think that people are getting to be inured to this kind of violence.”

Maybe. But it’s hard not to notice that even the strongest advocates of gun control legislation have been mostly silent in the aftermath of last week’s shooting.

Take Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.). In the wake of the Newtown massacre, Feinstein introduced an amendment that would have banned assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, which was voted down by the Senate in April. On June 7, while a deadly hail of bullets was flying in her home state, Feinstein was visiting Guantanamo Bay. Her office issued two press releases that day, neither of them about the shooting.

President Barack Obama told Congress in his State of the Union address in February that “The families of Newtown deserve a vote.” But last Friday he was a 10-minute drive away from SMC, and said nothing about the shooting — not that day, and not since. Obama’s advocacy group, Organizing for Action, has made gun control legislation a priority, but also made no public mention of the shooting in Santa Monica. Its Twitter feed was exclusively focused on the immigration reform bill making its way through the Senate.

Perhaps Waxman is right, that after Newtown (and Aurora and Virginia Tech and Columbine), five dead adults doesn't shock anyone anymore. Perhaps the seeming randomness of the violence made it harder to convey the horror of what happened in Santa Monica. Maybe the timing of the shooting (Friday afternoon, Pacific Time) and the ethnicities of the victims (three working-class Latinos and two members of the gunman’s family, both of Middle Eastern descent) helped bury the story.

But it’s also possible that Newtown hasn't changed the politics around gun control as much as advocates for stronger regulations would like to believe. The defeat of gun control legislation in the Senate earlier this year appears to have taken much of the energy out of the gun control movement nationally.

With no forward momentum in Washington, community leaders in Santa Monica have been left asking questions, and calling for unity and support.

“How do we make sense of the senseless? Comprehend the incomprehensible?” Assemblyman Richard Bloom (D-Santa Monica) said at a memorial service at a church on Sunday, according to Patch. The former mayor of Santa Monica, Bloom lives blocks away from the site of the shooting.

“Today, at this moment, we cannot know why,” Bloom said at the service. “Therefore it is today that we must be close to one another.”

Speakers delivered similar messages encouraging students to maintain hope in the face of tragedy at the SMC graduation on Tuesday evening, and the SMC foundation has set up memorial funds for the families of the victims who were killed on its campus.

But when it comes to passing laws that will reduce gun violence in this country, it’s hard to find reason for hope. There are a number of bills moving forward in the California legislature that will further strengthen gun control laws here, but the continued failure to pass national legislation makes it easier for illegal weapons to cross into the state. (Police are still tracing the Santa Monica shooter’s guns to determine how a person with a history of mental issues was able to obtain an assault weapon and high-capacity magazines that are already illegal in California.)

On Friday, in conjunction with the advocacy group Mayors Against Illegal Guns, members of families of victims of the Newtown shooting will begin a national bus tour to urge Senators to take a second look at the background check bill that they failed to pass this spring.

Waxman met with the families in Washington recently, and he said they’re right to focus their attention on a measure requiring universal background checks on gun sales — which 90 percent of Americans support, polls say.

They’re also right to focus on Congress’s upper chamber.

“The Senate should be easier than the House,” Waxman conceded, “because we don't even know if the Republicans that run the House will even take up the issue.”

Will the six-month anniversary of Newtown on Friday bring out news cameras? Will the family’s bus tour help revive the stalled Toomey-Manchin amendment in the Senate?

Maybe.

But if the absence of any national reaction to last Friday’s shooting spree is any indication of how much energy Americans are willing to devote to this issue, well, the Newtown families might as well stay home.

Dying in vain in Santa Monica and Sandy Hook Read More »

Israel’s Maccabi Tel Aviv name Paulo Sousa as new coach

Israeli champions Maccabi Tel Aviv have appointed Portuguese coach Paulo Sousa on a two-year contract, the club said on Wednesday.

Sousa, 42, moved to Maccabi from Hungarian side Fehervar. He previously coached the Portuguese Under-16 national side and had stints in England over a three-year stretch with Queens Park Rangers, Swansea City and Leicester City.

As a player, Sousa was a midfielder for Benfica, Sporting, Juventus, Borussia Dortmund, Inter Milan, Parma, Panathinaikos and Espanyol and made 51 international appearances for Portugal.

He replaces Spaniard Oscar Garcia who left Maccabi at the end of last season for personal reasons.

Garcia, formerly the Barcelona youth team coach, was recruited by Maccabi technical manager Jordi Cruyff at the start of last season and led the perennial underachievers to their first league title in ten years.

Writing by Ori Lewis; editing by Toby Davis

Israel’s Maccabi Tel Aviv name Paulo Sousa as new coach Read More »