fbpx

February 14, 2013

Senate Republicans block vote on confirming Hagel as defense chief

The Senate voted narrowly on Thursday to block a vote on confirmation of President Barack Obama's choice of Chuck Hagel as defense secretary, planning another vote for Feb. 26 – when it is expected to pass.

The tally was 58-40, with almost every Republican voting no, falling short of the 60 needed to pass a motion in the 100-seat chamber to stop debate and allow a vote by the full Senate on confirming the former Republican senator to the post.

The Senate's Democratic majority leader, Harry Reid, said the Senate would vote again on the motion on Feb. 26, after it returns from a week-long recess. Republicans said they expected the motion would pass then, after they have had more time to consider the nomination, clearing the way for the full Senate to vote on Hagel's confirmation.

With Democrats controlling a majority of 55 votes in the Senate, Hagel's nomination is expected to win the simple majority of 51 votes it needs to be passed by the full Senate once such a vote is allowed.

Reporting By Patricia Zengerle

Senate Republicans block vote on confirming Hagel as defense chief Read More »

Lautenberg says he will not run again

Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) said he will not run again for the Senate.

Lautenberg, 89, had previously said he would consider running again in 2014.

On Thursday, he told various media that he would instead dedicate the final two years of his term to passing new gun controls and environmental protections and creating jobs in New Jersey.

Lautenberg first served in the Senate from 1982-2000.

Two signature laws are called the “Lautenberg Amendment.” One passed in 1990 facilitates refugee status for those fleeing religious persecution. Designed originally for Soviet Jews, it has since been used to assist refugees from Vietnam, Burma and Iran among other nations.

The other passed in 1996 bans the sale of guns to people convicted of domestic violence.

Lautenberg first retired in 2000, but was asked by Democrats to run again in 2002 after incumbent Robert Toricelli was forced to drop out because of scandal.

Lautenberg's announcement was met with “sadness” by the National Jewish Democratic Council.

“Jewish Democrats around the country will miss his stalwart support for the U.S.-Israel relationship and his leadership on progressive domestic policies supported by the vast majority of American Jews,” it said.

Lautenberg says he will not run again Read More »

Not feeling the candy hearts and kitsch? How to turn around 50 shades of abysmal gray

It’s that time of year … chocolates, flowers, jewelry. Sappy advertisements and red and pink store displays. There are reminders everywhere. It’s Valentine’s Day.

Sure, it’s a bit commercial (understatement) but it’s all good. We know that. It’s beautiful to celebrate love.

But what about if you don't have a special someone or even your favorite chocolate already lined up for a great Thursday night? (Or perhaps you have a loving companion but you've somehow lost yourself in the relationship.) Whatever the reason, this day, with its cards and balloons, candy hearts and kitsch, is turning your mood fifty shades of a rather abysmal gray. Instead of bringing you a great sense of joy and intimacy, this so-called celebration feels more about absence or loss. And over the course of a day that seems to have somehow overlooked your very own precious self, you find yourself thinking, “I don’t have a valentine.”

To which we respond, what do you mean you don’t have a valentine?

Of course you have a valentine.

Walk right into the bathroom. Grab a hold of the sink and look up. Yours will be right there waiting, looking you straight in the punim.

Even if you feel very alone at times, you always have a valentine. It’s you.

That’s right. No matter who is or isn’t in your life, you are your own ultimate bashert.

And naturally, you’re fabulous. How lucky you are to have you for a valentine.

Because when you’re very your own valentine, you can celebrate any way you want.

How romantic it would be to buy yourself one perfect red rose. Not a whole bouquet. Just one perfectly closed bud representing your love for yourself. Take this vulnerable darling home and place it in a vase. All it needs is just a little bit of water.

Over the course of a few hours, watch your flower bloom as a symbol of you opening up to the undying expression of your own self love, showing yourself the greatest kindness, compassion and understanding, no matter what life brings.

Choose a song that opens your heart, and helps you dream a little dream, and dance with yourself. That’s right, ignite your own boogie fever. Don’t worry what it looks like. There are no rules here. You don’t even have to watch.

Yes, it's scary to be vulnerable. Even to yourself. But it’s also easy to be your own best valentine, the kind that promises extreme self care, extreme self empathy, extreme self respect. Because when you truly love yourself, every day is Valentine’s Day.

So when you're ready, grab a pen and some paper, or maybe even some broken crayons, and make yourself a good old fashioned valentine. That’s right, make some vows to yourself, to be true to yourself, and be your most authentic self. If you find yourself suddenly tongue tied, feel free to borrow these “Marriage Vows to Me” taken straight from the pages of my book, Hot Mamalah.

It’s true, Valentine’s Day is a celebration of sweethearts. Of relationships. Of your chocolate tooth. We're not denying that. But that doesn't mean it can't also be about celebrating the sweetness of your own life and the most intimate relationship you always have, the one with yourself. Isn't it about time you commit to love, honor and cherish?

Now go on. Get real with yourself and bring a little romance to your game. Valentine’s Day with yourself is EVERY day, forevermore.

That certainly sounds like a great romance to me.

Marriage Vows to Me © Lisa Alcalay Klug, 2012, Hot Mamalah: The Ultimate Guide for Every Woman of the Tribe

Mazal tov, now you’re a hot mamalah!

How do you know you're a hot mamalah?

Because you don't have to work hard to be hot. You just have to be you. Your most authentic self is the hottest thing of all.

How can you be sure you’re a hot mamalah?

Because a hot mamalah loves and respects herself.

How can you be positively certain you’re a hot mamalah?

Because a real mamalah is her own best valentine, today and every day.

And when you wake up the morning after, how do you remember you're a hot mamalah?

You. Just. Do.

Happy Valentine’s Day, You!

Not feeling the candy hearts and kitsch? How to turn around 50 shades of abysmal gray Read More »

Jewish groups praise Senate on Violence Against Women Act

Three Jewish groups praised the U.S. Senate's reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act and urged the House of Representatives to follow suit.

The Senate on Tuesday approved by a 78-22 vote the bill that would reauthorize the act first passed in 1994 for another five years. The bill was guaranteed passage in the Democratic-led Senate, but garnered substantial Republican support as well.

An effort to renew the act last year was stymied by objections in the U.S. House of Representatives. At the time, Republicans objected to expansions that would cover same-sex couples and would reinforce coverage for undocumented immigrants and Native Americans. Many of these expanded protections remain, but House Republican leaders say they now expect to approve the act's extension, with some minor modifications.

“The Violence Against Women Act has already reduced the rate of domestic violence by more than 50 percent since its original passage in 1994,” Jewish Women International said in its statement. It applauded the expanded version, saying it “ensures the continued support of successful programs and services, strengthens legal protections for LGBT victims, immigrants and college students, and gives Native American women equal access to justice.”

Also applauding the reauthorization were the Reform moment and the National Council of Jewish Women. “Domestic violence legislation has a long bipartisan history which we hope will inspire renewed efforts to reauthorize the law as quickly as possible,” the NCJW said.

Jewish groups praise Senate on Violence Against Women Act Read More »

Window into our minds?

Having been in the civil rights field for several decades, we have read and been offered numerous explanations for the inequality that exists in America. From it being the product of overt racist beliefs on the part of bigots, to socio-economic explanations to historic discussions of the remnants of slavery–some analyses last, others prove ephemeral and faddy.

In recent years, a novel theory has taken hold that suggests that people harbor biases and prejudices of which even they are unaware (“implicit bias“) and that those biases manifest themselves in the real world as discrimination and inequality.

The rise in popularity and acceptance of the Implicit Association Test (“IAT”) has offered what seemed like “evidence” that despite protestations of innocence, most of us harbor bias and that, as one advocate (Eva Patterson of the Equal Justice Society) has written—it is “social science research” that needs to be used “to prove that discrimination exists even when it is not tied to an overt act.” Patterson argues that the IAT is proof positive of just how pervasive and dangerous bigotry is—it has a hold on us of which we are unaware and it pervades how we act in the world. Patterson, and others, urge that the realtively new “science” needs to be drummed into the heads of judges and legislators to help them understand the world.

The IAT has become an exceptionally useful arrow in the quiver of those who argue that not much in America has changed, that we are a racist and discriminatory society that simply has a veneer of acceptance and tolerance. There are too many “civil rights” organizations who are wedded to the notion that the apparent increasing tolerance in America is a charade and that the disparities among racial and ethnic groups in terms of unemployment, income, health outcomes, etc. remain because of racism, mostly of the covert, subliminal kind. It’s a theme that gets hammered away at within academia, at conferences and in articles galore. America remains profoundly racist, it just doesn’t know it; so the message goes.

We have long been uneasy about questioning the data that the IATs offer, we are neither academics nor statisticians, but something seemed amiss. Virtually every poll that has come out over the past decade dealing with attitudes on race (many from the highly respected Pew Center) have evidenced greater tolerance and acceptance of differences based on race, ethnicity, religion and sexual orientation among virtually all cohorts of Americans. The data isn’t even close. We have ” target=”_blank”>decade.

Additionally, and not incidentally, Americans elected an African American president of the United States and did so in no uncertain terms. His being black was not an obstacle to a majority of Americans (not just a plurality in 2012) electing him our commander-in-chief.

And yet the IATs were this nagging data set that seemed to indicate that the optimism of all the polls and the other indicia of progress might be illusory—that we were unconsciously bigots and none of us really knew when or where or how that hate it will manifest itself in what we do.

Saturday’s Wall Street Journal had a fascinating ” target=”_blank”>link to the Levitin article and common sense might win out.

Window into our minds? Read More »

Mamie Currie Hughes and Today’s Civil Rights Struggle

I am a hero junkie. I look to meet heroes to learn about what they have done and what makes them tick. I am very blessed when they accept my invitation to become activist partners and soul-friends. This morning, I had coffee with my new friend Mamie Currie Hughes, an 83-year-old mother of five. Ms. Hughes shared with me that not so long ago she was not allowed to come into a coffee shop like this one unless she was brought in by a white man. The humility and modesty I saw in Mamie belie the unbending determination she has exhibited for decades as a bold community and civil rights activist.


Mamie has long been prominent for her political service. She represented the 4th district in the Jackson County Legislature for 6 years in the 1970s, and eventually chaired its Health and Welfare Committee. During this time, Ms. Hughes was chosen by her peers for the honored position of Vice-Chair of the Legislature, and a few years later she was appointed by President Carter to be Regional Director for ACTION, a Federal Volunteer Service Agency, where she oversaw more than 20,000 volunteers in four states. She was also ” target=”_blank”>Mamie Hughes is one of the only women in Kansas City who has a bridge named after her. During the 71 Highway road construction, her assistance with negotiations on behalf of the residents of the area inspired the city to come together to make the project successful. She calls it a “people bridge” and notes that it’s for all of us, signifying people tearing down walls.


Mamie has served on the administrative boards of an impressive list of organizations. Today she serves on boards of the Health Care Foundation of Greater Kansas City, ” target=”_blank”>Missouri Compromise of 1820-1821 brought Missouri into the Union as a slave state. In addition, the ” target=”_blank”>Uri L'Tzedek, the Senior Rabbi at Kehilath Israel, and is the author of “” target=”_blank”>one of the top 50 rabbis in America!”
 

Mamie Currie Hughes and Today’s Civil Rights Struggle Read More »

Disability Rights Are Civil Rights

As a non-profit professional in Los Angeles, I’ve worked at both Jewish and general charities. While it can sometimes be more comfortable for me to work in the Jewish community, I find myself stretching more as a person  in the non-Jewish environment, especially during the casual conversations over lunch, when African-American and Latino colleagues on occasion will share painful memories of discrimination.

So, as I am busy promoting and participating as a parent disability advocate with Jewish Disabilities Awareness Month during February, I am also mindful that this is also Black History Month, I am drawn to the parallels of each group, struggling to move out of the margins to claim their rightful place in our society.

When someone makes a snap judgment of your potential ability based solely on your appearance, that hurts. When dreams are taken away from you because of stereotyping and myths, that’s cruel. And when you can’t even receive the same level of education as your peers, it makes it incredibly difficult to ever catch up.

Some have commented that although the civil rights movement began with the black community’s own self-empowerment and organizing, it later grew to include others, including many Jews, who stood up and walked hand in hand against injustice. As the Black History website says, “The Civil Rights Movement was not about black and white, it was about right and wrong.”

So, how do we apply that to the Jewish Disability Awareness Movement? I worry that the families touched by disabilities are spending too much energy pointing fingers and talking amongst ourselves, complaining and wishing we had a more inclusive community. It’s time to take our issue to a new level and actively enlist the support of our extended family, friends and congregants.

Just like the Civil Rights movement of the 60s, we need a multi-pronged approach that uses a combination of grassroots activism along with high-level meetings with the top professionals and lay leaders to create the needed changes in attitude, funding and the willingness to make this issue a priority.

And this movement is really about helping to ensure the future of the whole Jewish community; As Jennifer Lazlo Mizrachi points out in her recent article in The Forward about ending discrimination against children with disabilities in our day schools, “Approximately 200,000 Jewish children in America have some sort of disability.”

With those numbers, it’s time to get organized, grow our cause and start singing together, “We shall overcome”.

Disability Rights Are Civil Rights Read More »

Filmmaker Claude Lanzmann honored at Berlin film festival

French documentary filmmaker and producer Claude Lanzmann will be honored at the 63rd Berlin International Film Festival, where he spoke about filming his famous “Shoah” documentary.

Lanzmann, 87, will receive an Honorary Golden Bear for his lifetime achievement on Thursday evening.

“I was happy, I was moved and I was proud,” Lanzmann told some 200 people who gathered for a conversation between the filmmaker and German film historian Ulrich Gregor, the day before the award ceremony.

Lanzmann became famous for his 10-hour and 13-minute documentary, “Shoah,” which was released in 1985 and took about 11 years to make. A digital restoration of the film was shown at the festival, which began Feb. 7 and runs through Feb. 17.

In a wide-ranging discussion, Lanzmann recalled how he had tricked old Nazis into giving him interviews. He said that a turning point in the filmmaking came when he set foot in the Polish village of Treblinka, where the death camp was located. Nearly 1 million Jews were gassed there, according to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum.

“I was loaded like a bomb, but the fuse was missing” before entering the village, Lanzmann recalled. Before that moment, “I could not admit that a village called Treblinka with people living inside it could exist. But it did exist.” Lanzmann then found and interviewed residents who remembered the death camp.

German audiences were shocked by the film when it came out, recalled Lanzmann, who watched them from the back of movie theaters. After the screenings, he and young Germans “had very long discussions that lasted long into the night,” he added.

Though Lanzmann said he did “not believe in messages,” he hopes his work has had an impact in countries where Holocaust denial is common. “Shoah” has been shown in Iran and in Turkey, broken up into one-hour segments, with translation into Turkish and Farsi

Lanzmann said he had written an open letter to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who in 2006 hosted a conference for Holocaust deniers. Ahmadinejad said he wanted to see corpses before he would believe that the Holocaust took place. “I told him that there is not one single corpse in ‘Shoah,’” because in extermination camps “there were no traces.”

“I said [to Ahmadinejad], ‘The best proof of the Shoah… is the absence of corpses. There is no trace. It was a perfect crime,'” Lanzmann said.

Six films by Lanzmann, related to Israel and the Holocaust, were screened at the festival.

Filmmaker Claude Lanzmann honored at Berlin film festival Read More »

A man’s guide: How to create romance in the kitchen [VIDEO]