fbpx

November 4, 2012

The Power of Social Media to Help Disabled/Frail Elderly after Sandy

“Still alive in day 5 of no power here in Lower Manhn, battery drain for every breath. Social media organizng svd mylife” – Tweet from Nick Dupree, artist, creator of “Dust Bunnies in Space”, disability advocate and living on a ventilator since 1994
(Note, his electricity finally came back earlier today, Nov. 3rd)

When the lights went out in their 12th floor Tribeca apartment in lower Manhattan, Nick Dupree and his partner, Alejandra Ospina, were faced with a huge crisis—how were they going to keep Nick’s lifesaving ventilator going? They had batteries on hand and a NY fire department station across the street with a generator, but the batteries needed changing every three hours, and Alejandra is also in a wheelchair. Evacuation was not a safe option.

Help arrived in the form of nearby friends, Facebook posts, tweets, and a network of other disability activists, all working together, some as far away as Boston, to make sure that Nick and Alejandra would have not just the batteries for the vent, for also for their cellphones and feeding pump, suction machine, oxygen concentrator & wheelchair that all needed power. They also needed distilled water for the machines plus food to eat and cash to buy other supplies, since ATMs without electricity weren’t working either.

Read the whole harrowing story here written by blogger and artist Crystal Evans-Pradha from Boston, who is a work-from-home-mom to her 2 year-old and uses a wheelchair due to mitochondrial myopathy (neuromuscular disease). She responded to Alejandra’s initial Facebook post and with a friend who worked for the Red Cross, took the 200- mile trek to NYC help deliver car batteries, distilled water and other needed supplies.

One lesson we can all learn from this story is that first-responders need to know who is the most vulnerable in different neighborhoods, and plan ahead how to get help to those people. Here in Los Angeles County, there’s a simple way to make sure people like Nick won’t be left alone – the Specific Needs Disaster Registry (SNAP).

But as we saw with Sandy, and what is likely to happen after a major earthquake in Southern California, we are advised to “to prepare themselves for up to 72 hours of self-sustained survival, should that become necessary.” During those three days, what will happen to the most vulnerable among us, such people with severe  physical disabilities or the frail elderly?  We will need to turn to our neighbors, our friends, and our faith-based and community organizations to knock on all the doors, and ask if any extra help is required. And if all else fails, there’s Facebook and Twitter.

The Power of Social Media to Help Disabled/Frail Elderly after Sandy Read More »

November 4, 2012

In-depth

Following the Elections, Mideast Peace Negotiations Should Resume

Writing in Algemeiner, Alab Dershowitz outlines the peace plan he puto to Netanyahu and Abbas.

My proposal to President Abbas was to have the Palestinian Authority agree to sit down and begin negotiations before any freeze began, if the Israelis would agree to begin a freeze only after the negotiations commenced in good faith.  In that way, the Israelis would get what they wanted:  negotiations beginning with no prior actions on their part.  And the Palestinians would get what they wanted:  a settlement freeze while the negotiations continued in good faith.

 

Americans in Israel Vote GOP

Eetta Prince-Gibson of Tablet talks to American-born Israelis about their choices for November 6.    

In 2008, only 30,000 ballots were cast by American-Israelis. Some are attributing this year’s dramatic jump to the pressing issues at stake for Israelis. But according to most observers, it’s mainly the result of intense get-out-the vote efforts made by groups such as Democrats Abroad and Republicans Abroad, which have been sponsoring town meetings, picnics, and debates throughout the country over the past nine months. The enthusiastic turnout they’ve ginned up has made some American-Israelis wonder whether they should be voting at all.

 

Daily Digest

Read Shmuel Rosner's Florida Diary: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5 and Part 6

Follow Shmuel Rosner on Twitter and Facebook for facts, figures, analysis and opinion in the run-up to the election

Check out Rosner's new book, The Jewish Vote: Obama vs. Romney / A Jewish Voter's Guide

November 4, 2012 Read More »

Ohio Diary 2: You-must-be-kidding-you-can’t-seriously-consider-voting-for-this-guy

I made a pact with a Columbus area rabbi: I can ask any question and quote any answer, as long as I don’t give his identity away. Not a hint, not a clue. Is it not problematic for a Jew in America to have such a fear of exposing his political beliefs? I ask him. The rabbi laughs. “You realize”, he says, “that my so-called fear has nothing to do with non-Jews – it is the Jews that I fear”.

He then asks if I read Roger Cohen’s article about The Jews of Cuyahoga County, which, of course, I did. The rabbi didn’t like Cohen’s use of the word “ugly” at the outset of his article (“Things are getting ugly among the Jews of Cuyahoga County, with family splits and dinner invitations declined”), but gives the impression that at times things are becoming, well, ugly. Not for all Jews in Cuyahoga of Columbus, not in all families. But in some cases it is – hence the rabbi’s obsession about not wanting to be exposed.

“If I get into political issues I’m definitely going to alienate some people from one side or the other, and more likely from both sides”. These are days of tension and bickering and highly partisan spirit. These are days in which “hardly anyone can see both sides’ arguments”.

Read Part 1 of Shmuel Rosner's Ohio Diary here

All Jews would like to think that they are in a position to be decisive in the 2012 election. But for the Jews of Ohio such a belief might not be as preposterous as it is for most other American Jews. And if the coming election is very, very close – as many believe it might be, and if the decisive state is Ohio – as many also tend to believe, then the Jews of Ohio might be right (reminder to readers: you have three more days until Election Day to read my book: The Jewish Vote: Obama vs. Romney / A Jewish Voter’s Guide).

Media reports certainly encourage Ohioan Jews to believe that their vote counts even more than usual. “Does all this matter? Yes it does”, writes Cohen.

“In an election that everybody expects to be very close, suddenly 20,000 Jewish votes may actually be very important”, American Jewish historian Jonathan Sarna told Bloomberg. And naturally, the Jewish press makes the Jewish vote even more crucial. “The Jewish vote could be the deciding difference if it is more Republican than usual”, Herb Weisberg, a professor of political science at Ohio State University, told the Jewish Week of New York.

Of course, the evangelical vote will be much more important that the Jewish vote. And the suburban vote, and the women's vote, and almost every other vote one can imagine. In the 2008 election, 30% of the Ohio vote was evangelical, and Obama carried the state. But this time, “if the share of the evangelical vote increases by a point or two, then the challenger could carry the Buckeye State”, as Ralph Reed, the president of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, told the Wall Street Journal.

Could such a small change in the Jewish vote have such an impact? That depends on one's definition of “change”. The Jews of Ohio make up less than 1.5% of the population and about 3% of the vote. Judging by the recent AJC survey of Jewish Ohio voters, Romney is likely to get 30% of the Jewish vote in the state, perhaps a little more (if more Jewish undecided break his way). That’s 5-10% more than the percentage of Jews voting for McCain in Ohio in 2008.

Do the math: 150,000 Jews in Ohio (1,500 Jews is 1% of the Jewish vote). This means that Romney could possibly get 7,500-15,000 more Jewish voters than McCain. Now think: Is it possible that the Ohio election would be determined by 7,500 votes? Yes, it is. Is it probable? Not as much. And again, if Jews are 3% of the vote and Evangelicals are 30% of the vote – this really means that 1% change in the evangelical vote (or, more likely, larger evangelical turnout), is as good as a 10% change in the Ohio Jewish vote.

Having met and interviewed 20-30 Ohioan Jews in the last couple of days, I can’t reliably tell you how the vote will break Tuesday. It is easy to find Obama voters (“is there even an alternative?” one Cleveland resident asked me), and is not very hard to find Romney voters (the easiest way: look for the Orthodox shul and the kosher deli), and occasionally one finds the 2008-Obama-disappointee (I found one carrying a Romney sign on the corner of Powell and South Cassady avenues). But truly, it is easier finding people who claim to know people that are disappointed with Obama. “Yes, I have some friends that voted for Obama in 2008 and are now voting for Romney”, Jerry Mayer told me. Stewart Ain got a better quote from Jewish Ohioan Bret Caller: “I’ve had dozens and dozens of Jewish friends who voted for Obama in ’08 say to me that they are on the fence and will make a decision in the voting booth”.

In my book, I begin chapter two with a story of a debate in Cleveland more than four years ago: “It was a sunny, breezy Sunday afternoon in the Beachwood suburb of Cleveland when two panelists took the stage to represent the two Democratic candidates in a debate aimed at the Jewish community of the area”. Congressmen Adam Schiff of California represented the Obama camp; the now infamous former Congressman Anthony Weiner of New York spoke for Clinton.

“It was an entertaining debate”, I wrote in the book, “as entertaining as it was duplicitous, especially on issues related to Israel. Obama, bragged Schiff, speaks his mind, whoever the audience might be. He, Schiff, was representing a truth teller. That may be so, but the same could not be said about Obama’s surrogate – Schiff”. When Schiff was asked: Does Senator Obama oppose Jewish settlements in the occupied territories? “[T]he Obama representative seemed to prefer caution to candor”. Obama, he assured the crowd, “had never criticized the settlements as being the obstacle to peace. Nor would he”.

And Weiner was no better than Schiff. “When asked to explain Clinton’s settlement policy, Weiner calmed the apprehensive Cleveland Jews with two promises: one, that Clinton would always respect the judgment of Israel and its citizens, and two, that she would move the American embassy to Jerusalem, something her husband, President Bill Clinton, did not do”.

I was reminded of this excerpt as I was reading a Tablet report on an event that I was unable to attend: Jack Lew, for Obama, vs. Tevi Troy, for Romney. Not that these two would be nearly as dishonest as the Obama-Clinton surrogates of 2008. Lew and Troy, after all, are administration professionals not veteran politicians. Nevertheless, Lew’s contention that Obama has “spent more time with Prime Minister Netanyahu than he has with any other world leader” (nominally true), does sound somewhat manipulative. As was Troy’s attempt to imply that in the Obama years, “the United States is not defending Israel”. And I must say that many of the Ohio Jews I have met in recent days tend to think about Obama and Romney in the same dichotomist manner. Obama is “an enemy of Israel”, an irate Rob Gold told me. Romney will “ban all abortions”, a weary Bev (or maybe Deb; please forgive my insensitive Israeli ears) Hart explained knowledgeably.

Being a voter with so much responsibility is not easy. Getting it right is not easy either. Maybe that’s why my friend the rabbi is so coy about his observations and choices. “I really hope that a couple of weeks after this is settled” – when the next president is elected and is sworn in – “the Jews in this community can have a conversation about Obama and Romney that is not as emotional”, he says.

Can such thing really happen? He isn’t sure. “That depends on the policies of the next president”. In other words: All that is going to happen in the coming months is a shift from the “you-must-be-kidding-you-can’t-seriously-consider-voting-for-this-guy” debate to the “I-told-you-he-was-going-to-be-a-disaster” one. 

 

Read Shmuel Rosner's Florida Diary: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5 and Part 6

Follow Shmuel Rosner on Twitter and Facebook for facts, figures, analysis and opinion in the run-up to the election

Check out Rosner's new book, The Jewish Vote: Obama vs. Romney / A Jewish Voter's Guide

Ohio Diary 2: You-must-be-kidding-you-can’t-seriously-consider-voting-for-this-guy Read More »

“The Good Girls Revolt” – by Lynn Povich – Recommended Reading

“The Good Girls Revolt – How The Women of Newsweek Sued Their Bosses and Changed the Work Place,” by Lynn Povich, is a painstakingly researched story of one of the seminal events affecting the rights of women in the American work place in the early years of the women’s movement.

In March, 1970, 46 Newsweek women sued Newsweek Magazine for sexual discrimination in hiring and promotion. Charging that “there seems to be a gentlemen’s agreement at Newsweek that men are writers and women are researchers, and the exceptions are few and far between,” carefully and with resolve these women set out to do something that had never been done before – bring a class action civil rights suit against one of the publishing world's juggernauts.

Katherine Graham, then the publisher of The Washington Post and President of the Washington Post Company (the parent company of Newsweek), when told of the lawsuit asked, “Which side am I supposed to be on?” 

The 46 Newsweek women enlisted the legal counsel of the young firebrand attorney Eleanor Norton Holmes who successfully guided the suit to victory and opened not just the publishing business, but the workplace generally, to greater fairness and opportunities for women.

Lynn Povich was one of the ringleaders.

A disclaimer, Lynn is a friend. However, even if she were not, I would recommend this volume especially to young women who were born long after the struggles fought by their mothers and grandmothers. It is too easy to take for granted the opportunities available to women today, even with the inequities, without pausing to consider the scope of the suppression, humiliation and injustice suffered in the past (AMC's “Mad Men” well describes the world in which Lynn and her colleagues struggled). For anyone 60 years and older, we remember those years pre-Feminine Mystique, pre-Newsweek women, pre-Roe v Wade. Much, thanks to Lynn, her colleagues and many others, has changed in the last 40 years, and this book enables us to take stock and be grateful to those women who stuck their necks out.

Lynn began as a secretary at Newsweek and within 5 years (after the lawsuit itself, revealing the good will of its top management) became the magazine’s first woman senior editor. In 1991 she left Newsweek to become editor-in-chief of Working Woman Magazine and managing editor/senior executive producer for MSNBC.com.

Lynn explains how these 46 women came to sue Newsweek and how they “conspired” in the Ladies Room out of fear of being fired.

Neither Lynn nor her colleagues were the stereotypical hard-edged, bra-burning, hard, man-hating women so often dismissed by Rush Limbaugh and company. To the contrary, Lynn and her colleagues were humble and self-effacing, often smarter and more talented than their male counterparts, who wanted Newsweek to be the progressive magazine it prided itself even then on being so they, based on hard work and talent, could progress.

Lynn told this story not only because the case the Newsweek women brought was historic (i.e. the first class action suit filed and won on behalf of women in the American workplace), but because still today there are inequities that need to be addressed, including equal pay for equal work and discrimination against women who choose to become mothers and work.

Lynn writes about the women’s lives (with their permission) who were at the center of this story and what happened to them since. She is candid about herself as well.

Lynn's is a success story, but not all the 46 were successful despite their intelligence and talent. Plagued by prejudice and personal pressures, some became casualties after the struggle.

Lynn shows how changes in the law did not change everything, and she reflects on what needs still to be addressed if justice and fairness are to prevail.

“The Good Girls Revolt” – by Lynn Povich – Recommended Reading Read More »

Evangelical anti-Mormonism: A guide for Jews

Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil
against you falsely, for my sake. Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in
heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you. – Matthew 5:11-12

—–

During a recent presentation on Mormonism at Temple Isaiah in Los Angeles, I was asked twice why Evangelicals don’t consider Mormons to be Christians and why some of them go so far as to classify the LDS Church as a cult. After suggesting that they must have a different definition of Christianity, I recommended that they ask Evangelicals why they hold those views instead of relying on me to explain them. In hindsight, I realized that I was extending to Evangelicals a courtesy that is rarely reciprocated.

Much has been made of the willingness of Evangelicals, Baptists, and other conservative Christians to set aside their misgivings about LDS Christianity and pull the lever for Mitt Romney this week. Four years ago they championed Mike Huckabee, and this time they’re holding their noses and voting for the Mormon anti-Obama candidate. The Billy Graham Evangelistic Association has even removed Mormonism from its list of “cults” just in time for the election. Well, bully for them! While one can certainly hope that decades of Evangelical anti-Mormon bigotry will soon go the way of Evangelical anti-Catholic bigotry and Evangelical anti-Semitism, I have a feeling that things will revert to the status quo ante after the election.

There are many opportunities for Mormons to work with Evangelicals (and Jews, for that matter) to make the world a better place. This is especially true in the political arena, which has witnessed the formation of conservative faith coalitions in order to uphold traditional moral values and religious freedom. People don’t have to worship in the same place or believe exactly the same things in order to see eye to eye on the issues of the day. In my experience, Evangelicals in the pews are decent, God-fearing people of conviction and action. Left to their own devices, I believe that they would be accepting of other people who claim to be followers of Jesus Christ. However, many Evangelicals are led by pastors who are theological cowards and liars to boot.

If only pastors would follow what I call the Jewish/Mormon Model for Interfaith Inquiry. When Jewish and Mormon congregations want to know what other religions believe, they invite leaders from those faith communities to address them and answer questions. I have spoken at many such events in synagogues and Jewish schools, and once moderated a series of presentations by religious leaders for Mormons living in Santa Monica. One presentation was made by a friendly Evangelical pastor whom I knew from my Israel advocacy work. Truth be told, Evangelical theology as seen through a Mormon prism is incomplete and fairly uninteresting.  A recent Pew survey showed that Mormons know the Bible better than Evangelicals. In addition, we accept Jesus as our Savior, and we believe in God’s grace as a means of salvation. Those topics took up all of the good pastor’s talk, and those present were courteous and respectful as they peppered him with questions. What is relevant here is that a faithful Evangelical was given the opportunity to speak about his faith to Mormons. The reverse almost never happens in the Evangelical community.

Instead, pastors who want to “educate” members of their flock about the LDS Church will often invite anti-Mormon speakers to speak at a “Mormon Night” where living, breathing Mormons are not welcome. Some evangelical leaders even claim expertise in LDS theology after reading an anti-Mormon book or two. A case in point is Jay Childs, Senior Pastor of the Midland Evangelical Free Church in Midland, Michigan. On his personal blog, which is linked to the church’s website, Pastor Childs claims to have lectured on Mormon theology “in a couple of venues” and to have “talked these things over with Mormon missionaries” before stating his strong disagreement with the “bedrock theological moorings” of LDS Christianity. What, pray tell, are these offensive moorings? “In a nutshell, Mormons believe that Jesus was a polygamist, that He is the spirit brother of Lucifer, that all faithful Mormon males can become gods, and that Adam is the resurrected god of this planet.” A Mormon fact checker would have a field day with these assertions: The LDS Church does not teach that Jesus was married, let alone that He was a polygamist, and we certainly do not believe that Adam is God. The other two statements are true, but require additional explanation, sort of like having an “expert on Judaism” assert that faithful Jews support the “mutilation” of little boys. True? Yes. An adequate explanation? Hardly.    

What is especially sad about this mendacious pastor’s rants is that just down the road is an LDS Institute (=Mormon Hillel) headed by a director with a graduate degree whose job is to teach LDS theology. One would think that a pastor in Midland who was truly interested in teaching his congregants about Mormonism would give Daymon Leonhardt a ring and ask him to make a presentation at his church.

However, if I were Daymon, I wouldn’t stand by the phone. The dynamic in play here is fear, not friendship. Lots of current Mormons used to be Evangelicals, and our church is viewed as a threat by their leaders. Fear is the catalyst for the whole anti-Mormon industry of books, videos, and speakers that have slandered and vilified our church for decades. My Catholic girlfriend in high school was given an anti-Mormon book by her guidance counselor after expressing interest in her boyfriend’s church. One can only imagine the reaction of Jewish parents if their son’s girlfriend were given The Protocols of the Elders of Zion by a school official after expressing interest in Judaism. Where Christian principles fit into this campaign of distortions and lies is a mystery to me.   

While I welcome critical comments on my blog, I do have a policy of deleting anti-Mormon comments, reasoning that anti-Mormons are welcome to create their own blog on a Jewish website if they feel that Jews care what they have to say (good luck!). However, I must thank the good pastor for inspiring me to set a new rule for posters to my blog: If you claim that Mormons believe something outrageous, be prepared to back it up by offering up a quote from an LDS leader or official source from this century (i.e., the last 12 years). The pastor got his “Adam-God” theory from controversial statements made by Brigham Young over 140 years ago (and probably cited in an anti-Mormon book). Church leaders have opposed this theory since the 19th century, and in the 1970s LDS Church President Spencer W. Kimball publicly denounced it. As any Mormon can tell you, we don’t believe that Adam is God. Here’s a theological rule of thumb for my Jewish readers: If the only source for a “Mormon” belief comes from the 19th century, it’s not a Mormon belief. I’ve set the 12-year rule because chances are good that the people making those statements can defend themselves. It’s pretty cowardly to attribute false teachings to Mormons by quoting leaders who are not around to respond. 

I am proud to belong to a church that does not hold “Evangelical Nights,” publish anti-Evangelical books, produce anti-Evangelical films, or host anti-Evangelical speakers. Although we disagree with some aspects of Evangelical theology, we accept them as fellow Christians. However, we don’t believe that Christianity condones slander and libel. It is my hope that Evangelical leaders will eventually choose to shut down the anti-Mormon industry and devote themselves to the exclusive preaching of their faith. Until they do, they’re not going to get any applause from me for their occasional praise of individual Mormons’ virtues. If I had to choose today between having Romney win with the support of pastors who think he belongs to a non-Christian cult, or having Obama win without it, I would toss a coin.

Evangelical anti-Mormonism: A guide for Jews Read More »

Webcast: Rita Rocks UCLA’s Royce Hall!

Several hundred Los Angeles area Iranian American fans had packed UCLA’s Royce Hall this past week on November 1st as they danced and joined in singing with popular Iranian-Israeli singing superstar, Rita Jahanforuz. Known simply to her fans in Israel and worldwide as “Rita”, she indeed brought the house down singing her well known Israeli songs in Hebrew as well as the long popular Persian songs. Her heart-pounding powerful performance of popular Persian songs such as “Gole-Sangam” and “Shah-Doomad” had fans at the concert singing and dancing along with her the whole time. The concert’s attendees included local Iranian Americans of various religious backgrounds who were hardcore fans of Rita. The evening’s performance also featured a number of solo performances by Rita’s brand members who played traditional Persian music instruments such as the “tar” a long-necked three-string instrument that is similar to a lute.

Following Rita’s performance, nearly three dozen private guests including Israeli Consul General David Siegel welcomed Rita and praised her efforts as an Israeli ambassador of goodwill with her music. Rita serves as a remarkable ambassador of goodwill from Israel not only because she speaks and sings in Persian, but she represents the Iranian segment of Israeli society that embraces their cultural heritage from Iran and would one day like to renew relations with individuals in their former homeland. Rita and her music also enable Israel in a non-political atmosphere to directly outreach to the people of Iran with their message of peace despite the Iranian regime’s repeated calls for Israel’s destruction.

The following is a segment of Siegel’s brief and very special welcome to Rita that night…click here

In 2012, her album “All My Joys,” also sung in Persian, has been tremendously popular in both Israel and Iran. Interesting enough Rita’s music is prohibited by the Iranian regime along with all music which is banned under the radical Islamic laws of the country–  yet thousands of Iranians listen to Rita’s music online or on bootleg versions of her C.D. Her legions of fans in Iran bombard her daily with e-mails of praise and even call into Persian-language radio and television programs based in Israel or the U.S. asking hosts to play her music.

 

Rita, who was born in Iran in 1962 and immigrated with her family to Israel in 1970, represents a certain smaller segment of the Iranian community in Israel who never firsthand witnessed the Iranian revolution and therefore still feel a strong sense of nostalgia for Iran and Iranian culture. The nostalgia some Iranian Jews have for Iranian culture also stems from the significant tolerance and prosperity they enjoyed while living in under the Pahlavi dynasty for more than 50 years. What is truly remarkable to me about Rita’s music today is the fact that for centuries many Jews living in Iran were musicians that kept the country’s music alive despite the national Islamic prohibition against Muslims listening to or performing music in Iran. Ironically today, you have a Jewish person like Rita keeping Persian music, songs and culture alive with her albums and performances!

(Hundreds of fans pack UCLA's Royce Hall to enjoy Rita's concert).

 

 

(Iranian-Israeli pop superstar singer “Rita”, photo by Karmel Melamed)

 

 

(left to right; Iranian-Israeli singer Rita, former Iranian Jewish mayor of Beverly Hills Jimmy Delshad and Israeli Consul General David Siegel).

 

 

(Israeli Consul General David Siegel honors Iranian-Israeli singer Rita for her work as a goodwill ambassador to Israel during her latest concert at UCLA's Royce Hall, photo by Karmel Melamed)

Webcast: Rita Rocks UCLA’s Royce Hall! Read More »