fbpx

October 4, 2012

Post-debate notes: The 5% Jewish question

1.

In my new book about The Jewish Vote – if you don't yet have it – now would be a good time to buy it here (for Kindle) or here (paperback) – I discuss Romney's “long history of – your choice – changing his mind or flip-flopping on a whole set of social issues” and use the example of abortion. But then I go on to write:

 

The question really is whether Romney truly changed his mind, in which case he is definitely ideologically to the right of most Jewish voters, or whether he is just masquerading his true feelings for political considerations (not a noble position, but one that politicians are forced to take from time to time). However, what his current position makes clear is this: If you believe him to be telling the truth or not, abortion is not an issue on which a President Romney is going to spend much of his time. That’s essentially the pragmatic argument Jewish voters hear from Republicans on the economy – don’t look to the ideology, look to the probable actions. Romney will not erase Medicare for today’s elderly, and he will not try to change the rules on abortion, no matter what his views truly are.

 

No doubt, yesterday's debate makes the Romney-the-pragmatist case much more pronounced, and gives voters – including the small pool of undecided Jewish voters – an opportunity to take a second look at a more moderate Romney. A moderate Romney is the only Romney that is sellable to undecided Jewish voters. Did he succeed with them yesterday? Would they be willing to reconsider his candidacy?

2.

A lot has been said and written in recent days about the two polls – Florida and Ohio – conducted by the AJC. As I've already written, these should be treated very carefully. The margin of error is significant – 6% for Florida, 6.4% for Ohio. But let's take another look at the Ohio poll to understand what it means.

Twenty –nine percent would vote for Romney (before the debate), 64% for Obama, 7% are undecided. Of the undecided, 1% lean toward Romney and 1% toward Obama – making this a 30% -65% race. The question, then, is what happens with the 5% who are still undecided.

If they split their votes between the two candidates, we get a 32%-67% race. This will be an achievement for Romney, and a problem for Obama. If the 5% decide not to vote and eliminate themselves from the count, the outcome would be just a bit different. More like 31%-68%. But what if the undecided split their votes in favor of one of the candidates?

In question 3, we see that when the Independents are forced to pick a party, more tilt toward the Democratic Party (13% for the Dem, 9% for the GOP). If the same proportion of undecided presidential votes goes to the candidates, this will be more like a 30%-70% race, putting Obama closer to his 2008 Jewish numbers (74%). Of course, the debate, or other developments might make the 5% tilt toward Romney. In which case, he could reach as high as 35%, giving the Republican Party a share of the Jewish vote they have not seen since George H.W. Bush.

3.

But remember, all this is about Ohio. The poll of the general Jewish population is a little better for Obama. True, he only gets 65% of the vote – but Romney only gets 24%. Since the 10% undecided (9.9% to be precise) weren't asked about their leanings, one can see a 34% ceiling for Romney and 75% ceiling for Obama. However, there are a couple of warning signs, giving one the impression that Obama might not be the one getting more than half of the undecided. For example, only 63% “strongly” or “somewhat” approve of Obama's economic policies. The economy is by far the most important issue for the voters.

4.

On the other hand, we should also take another look at party identification trends among Jewish voters – an issue that we continuously follow through our Jewish Party Identification J Meter tracker. With the third survey of 2012 available for us now, we seem to have a slight increase in Democratic identification this year. The GOP, with 16% of Jews identifying with it, has to get almost half of the Independent vote to reach 30% and up. In the Ohio poll, it looks like such goal is achievable. In the Florida poll, not as much. The bottom line is quite clear though: Romney, by playing the moderate and having handily won the debate, increased his chances with Jewish voters. If the latest AJC numbers pointy to 5% undecided that can put Romney at 35%, and the latest Gallup numbers found 5% that can put him at 30% – following the debate the GOP candidate can hope for some good news from the Jewish front.

Post-debate notes: The 5% Jewish question Read More »

America’s and Israel’s “Red-Lines” in Iran’s March to Build a Nuclear Bomb

In the past year President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have conferred continuously about when Iran’s nuclear bomb program should be “disrupted” by military action should economic and political sanctions not succeed in halting Iran’s march to build a bomb.

They agree that Iran cannot be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons. They disagree when action should be taken.

PM Netanyahu has urged that the “red line” for attack against Iran's nuclear facilities be when Iran has the capacity to make a nuclear bomb. The United States' “red line” will be crossed when Iran actually decides to make a bomb.

J Street (a pro-Israel pro-peace political and educational organization in Washington, D.C.) has made a video in which Director of Government Affairs Dylan Williams explains what it takes to make a bomb and the details of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s “red line.” 

I urge you to take 3 minutes to watch it.

America’s and Israel’s “Red-Lines” in Iran’s March to Build a Nuclear Bomb Read More »

Palestinian U.N. status likely to be debated in November

The United Nations is likely to hold a debate on whether to upgrade the Palestinians' U.N. status to a sovereign country in mid-November – after the U.S. election, the president of the 193-member U.N. General Assembly said on Wednesday.

Having failed last year to win recognition of full statehood at the United Nations, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said last week he would seek a less-ambitious status upgrade at the world body to make it a “non-member state” like the Vatican.

The Palestinians' current U.N. status is an “observer entity.” If Abbas wins, that would change to “observer state.”

“Come the middle of November, there's going to be an international debate on the Palestine issue in the General Assembly,” U.N. General Assembly President Vuk Jeremic told a news conference.

“There are electoral and political calendars in many parts of the world,” he said in a reference covering the November 6 U.S. election.

“My understanding is the Palestinian Authority leadership is going to engage in extensive discussions … coming to a conclusion as to what they want to do some time in November.”

Upgraded status for a Palestinian state could be uncomfortable for Israel. Being registered as a state rather than an entity would mean the Palestinians could join bodies such as the International Criminal Court and file a raft of complaints against Israel for its continued occupation.

An upgraded status would also anger Israel's close ally, the United States, which argues that a Palestinian state can only be created through direct negotiations.

There have been no direct Palestinian talks with Israel on peace since 2010, when the Palestinians refused to resume negotiations unless the Israeli government suspended settlement building in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said last week that the two-state solution was the only sustainable option for peace. But he said the continued growth of Israeli settlements meant that “the door may be closing, for good.”

The so-called two-state solution involves the creation of a state of Palestine to exist peacefully alongside Israel.

Reporting by Michelle Nichols; Editing by David Brunnstrom

Palestinian U.N. status likely to be debated in November Read More »

October 4, 2012

In-depth

Iran Loses the Economic Battle

John Allen Gay of the National Interest takes a hard look at the Islamic Republic's imploding financial system. 

The Islamic Republic reportedly has funneled ten billion dollars into backing the Assad regime in Syria, yet the situation on the ground continues to deteriorate slowly. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has even had a falling out with Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Gorps-Qods Force head Qassim Suleimani, who was once untouchable. Tehran is now rumored to be seeking contact with the Syrian opposition, but the bleeding—physical and financial—is unlikely to stop soon.

 

Free Speech and Muslim Unrest

Professor Timur Kuran talks to the Council on Foreign Relations on the development of an ethos of free speech in the Arab world. 

Sooner or later, though, I think the principles that have served the United States and Western Europe quite well will take hold in the Middle East as well. We should keep in mind that the Middle East and the Islamic world in general have undergone a massive transformation since the nineteenth century.

 

Fetishizing Holocaust Tattoos

A new trend of young Israelis reproducing the tattoos of their relatives who survived the Holocaust is profoundly distasteful, writes Jonathan Tobin in Commentary Magazine

The most important challenge for Jews today is to reconnect with Judaism, Jewish peoplehood and to act to protect the living Jewish state that is the best guarantee that the Holocaust will never happen again. That requires joint action that seems the antithesis of elevating a tattooed number inspired by Nazi dehumanization into a conversation starter.

 

Daily Digest

October 4, 2012 Read More »

The Clouds of Glory and Human Responsibility!

After the spiritual intimacy of Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur, we subversively break from the walls of institutions and the comforts of home into our modest sukkot (outdoor huts). It is in these huts that we rediscover the religious foundation of our human responsibility.

The Torah teaches that the purpose of sitting in the sukkah is so that later generations should know that the Jewish People were placed in Sukkot when they left Egypt (Leviticus 23:42-43). The rabbis argue about the meaning of this ritual (Sukkah 11b). Rabbi Eliezer suggests that we dwell in the sukkot to commemorate the miracle of the ananei hakavod (clouds of glory) that sheltered the Israelites from the hot sun in the desert. Rabbi Akiva, on the other hand, argues that we sit in sukkot to commemorate the actual sukkot the Israelites were miraculously provided (in the city of Sukkot) while in the desert.

The great 19th-century rabbi, the Sfat Emet (Rabbi Yehuda Leib Alter), suggested both rabbis of the Talmud were correct. He suggested that the clouds of glory (Rabbi Eliezer) represent the miracles at the time when Divine Providence was clearly observed by all. The actual sukkot (Rabbi Akiva) represent the miracles of Divine Providence that are no longer openly seen. Thus, in our sukkot today we are reminded that we must have more faith and we must devote more human toil to enable that hidden Divine Providence.

Rabbi Yitzchak Aizik Sher also suggested a synergy between the two positions. The clouds of glory represent a miracle that covered the entire Jewish people. The sukkot represent the individual providence that G-d did and does for each individual. We can be appreciative of global, national, and covenantal miracles, and we can also appreciate the blessing of a more intimate and personal providence.

The great 16th-century rabbi called the Mabit (Rabbi Moshe ben Yosef Trani) asks why a holiday was not created around the other miracles of the desert, such as the providing of manna to eat or the wells to drink from. He answers that it was an extra miracle that G-d provided the luxury of shelter and not just survival (Beit Elokim Shaar ha’yesodot 37). We can never express enough gratitude to be alive and to have food and drink. But we are also grateful for the other “luxuries” that we consider needs, and we emulate G-d in securing these needs for others as well. One can survive without certain human needs and wants, but one cannot flourish without them. The Sukkot represent the blessings of human potential and flourishing.

On Sukkot, we commemorate historical miracles and eternal values, national redemption and personal salvation, Divine providence and human toil, the spiritual and the physical, the metaphysical and concrete pragmatism. In the sukkah, we are reminded of the peace that exists in the world that we can be thankful of and the need to further perpetuate that peace.

We are not only to welcome the stranger into our huts, we are commanded to once again experience our own alienation. The Torah makes the case on numerous occasions (Leviticus 23:42, 25:23, Chronicles I: 29:15, Psalms 39:13, etc.) that all humans and all Jews are gerim (strangers and immigrants). Not only are we strangers alienated before our Creator, we are also strangers on this earth during our temporary visit to the world. Rashi explains (Leviticus 23:42) that our sukkot must not only include citizens but also immigrants and strangers to ensure we remember our true nature and our temporary corporeal existence.

By reconnecting with our modest hut and connecting with other strangers in the community, we can rediscover our own frailty, our own alienation and our own human responsibility.


Rabbi Shmuly Yanklowitz is the Founder and President of “>Jewish Ethics & Social Justice: A Guide for the 21st Century.” Newsweek named Rav Shmuly one of the The Clouds of Glory and Human Responsibility! Read More »