fbpx

July 12, 2012

National Jewish Democratic Council removes Adelson petition

The National Jewish Democratic Council, citing peace among Jewish groups, has taken down a petition calling on Republicans not to accept money from Sheldon Adelson.

“Accusations against Mr. Adelson were made not by us, but by others, including Senator John McCain (R-AZ),” said a statement sent late Wednesday by NJDC President David Harris and Chairman Marc Stanley. “Nonetheless, we regret the concern that this campaign has caused. And in the interest of shalom bayit (peace in our home/community), we are going to take down our petition today. Moving forward, we’ll continue to work hard to fight against the unique threat posed by the outsized influence of certain individual megadonors, which rightly concerns most Americans and most American Jews.”

The petition based the call on allegations by a former employee suing Adelson for firing him that the billionaire casino magnate agreed to allow prostitution at his casinos in Macau, China; on the claim by McCain that Adelson, with the tens of millions of dollars he has infused into the Republican side of this year’s elections, was effectively introducing Chinese money into the campaign; and on federal investigations into allegations that Adelson has paid bribes in China.

A number of Jewish groups and figures, including the Jewish Federations of North America, the Anti-Defamation League, the Republican Jewish Coalition and Alan Dershowitz called the allegations unconscionable, noting that all had yet to be proven.

Harris and Stanley said in the statement that “we don’t believe we engaged in character assassination. We stand by everything we said, which was sourced from current, credible news accounts.”

Adelson and his wife, Miriam, have given tens of millions of dollars this year to political committees supporting Republicans in general and Romney, the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, in particular, although it is not clear if he has directly given to Romney.

He is a major giver to Jewish causes, especially the Birthright Israel program bringing young people to Israel and Yad Vashem, Israel’s Holocaust memorial, and has donated to causes associated with or favored by those who have defended him in this case.

National Jewish Democratic Council removes Adelson petition Read More »

Israel hits Gaza terrorists planning attacks

Israel’s military said it struck a Hamas terrorist cell planning to launch an anti-tank missile at Israeli troops and another ready to launch a rocket into Israel.

One Palestinian man was killed and four people were injured in the two attacks on Thursday morning, according to the Ma’an Palestinian news service.

In the first incident, Israeli tanks and aircraft fired on the terrorists, who were targeting Israeli soldiers performing “routine activity near the security fence,” the Israel Defense Forces said in a statement.

In the second incident, the Israeli aircraft hit terrorists completing preparations to launch a rocket into southern Israel, according to the IDF.

The IDF said that in the past year, nearly 400 rockets fired from the Gaza Strip have hit southern Israel.

Israel hits Gaza terrorists planning attacks Read More »

Arson suspected in fire at Eritreans’ Jerusalem apartment

Two African migrants were injured after a fire was allegedly set at the entrance to their Jerusalem apartment.

The fire broke out early Thursday morning; firefighters reportedly found rags soaked in an accelerant at the entrance to the apartment.

Its residents, a man and his pregnant wife, both from Eritrea, were taken to Hadassah-Ein Kerem Hospital suffering from moderate burns and smoke inhalation.

Four Eritrean migrants were injured a month ago when their Jerusalem apartment was set alight. There also have been several arson incidents against African migrants in Tel Aviv.

Arson suspected in fire at Eritreans’ Jerusalem apartment Read More »

$70 billion on, Claims Conf. marks 60 years of reparations from Germany

When representatives of Israel, Germany and the newly created Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany met 60 years ago in Europe to hammer out a reparations agreement for the crimes of Nazi Germany, some Holocaust survivors were still living in Displaced Persons camps on the continent.

The mood at the negotiating table was solemn, recalled Saul Kagan, 89, who participated in the negotiations and went on to lead the Claims Conference for more than four decades.

“There were no handshakes, there was no banter or anything else,” Kagan said in a video message Tuesday evening at an event at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum here marking the 60th anniversary of the first reparations agreement.

“We somehow had the feeling that we were not alone in this room,” he said. “Somehow we felt that the spirits of those who couldn’t be there were there with us.”

Six decades on, much has followed from that first document signed in 1952, known as the Luxembourg Agreement.

Germany has paid the equivalent of more than $70 billion to survivors and programs that aid survivors. Israel and Germany have become close allies. Germany has made Holocaust education a centerpiece of its identity, creating school curricula, building Holocaust museums and funding anti-Semitism eradication programs.

This week, Germany took the additional step of changing its funding criteria to add an estimated 80,000 more Nazi victims to those it provides with one-time payments of about $3,150 from the Hardship Fund, which is designated for Jews who fled the Nazis as they swept eastward through Europe. The change, which is expected to affect mostly survivors in Russia and Ukraine, opens the door to funding for the last major group of Nazi victims who have never received money from Germany.

Claims Conference representatives hailed the move as a historic breakthrough.

“This agreement ensures that virtually every Holocaust survivor will be covered,” Stuart Eizenstat, a former U.S. undersecretary of state who represents the Claims Conference in negotiations with the Germans over Holocaust restitution, told JTA. “It’s really a major upgrading of the whole relationship. It’s the first time since 1952 that Germany has negotiated a new agreement.”

In his speech at the anniversary event, Eizenstat said that “It is a testimony to Germany that we are now negotiating with a third generation of German leaders after World War II, supported by the German people, that have acknowledged their historical responsibility to the Jewish people.”

In addition to agreeing to expand the Hardship Fund to ex-Soviet countries that are not in the European Union, Germany agreed to equalize the monthly pensions it sends to some 60,000 survivors around the world, correcting what until now had been a disparity that saw survivors living in western countries receiving more than those in eastern countries. All survivors will now receive the equivalent of approximately $370 per month.

Germany also agreed to relax the eligibility rules for those who receive restitution payments for being forced into hiding during the Nazi era. Until now, only those who went into hiding for at least 12 months were eligible; now the eligibility threshold will be six months.

Together, the changes are expected to cost Germany an additional $300 million.

“The German government is assuming even greater responsibility than before,” said Werner Gatzer, who as state secretary of the German Finance Ministry represents Germany in negotiations with the Claims Conference. Gatzer made his remarks in a speech Tuesday night at the 60th anniversary event. “This process is about much more than just financial compensation. It’s about the recognition of all these individual, personal destinies that need to be heard and preserved.”

Gatzer said a “spirit of cooperation and trust” guides the negotiations process.

“It’s amazing that we’ve been able to get payment for tens of thousands of the poorest Jews on the planet,” Greg Schneider, the executive vice president of the Claims Conference, told JTA. “It’s an acknowledgement of their suffering at the hands of the Nazis decades ago.”

While the Claims Conference administers Germany’s restitution programs, it also makes allocations of its own from the so-called Successor Organization, which is the legal beneficiary of money from the sale of Jewish-owned properties in the former East Germany for which no heirs have come forward.

On Wednesday, the Claims Conference board approved $136 million in allocations from the Successor Organization for each of the next two fiscal years. The bulk of the money will go to programs that aid survivors, including home care, soup kitchens, meals on wheels and medical assistance programs. Slightly less than $18 million per year will go toward Holocaust education.

The board also voted to create a Goodwill Fund of approximately $61 million for heirs of former East German properties who missed previous deadlines for making claims on those properties.

This year’s Claims Conference board meeting represented something of a high point for the organization. For the first time in three years, the meeting was not overshadowed by talk of the massive fraud that was discovered at the conference in late 2009. The $57 million fraud figure has not grown in recent months, and 12 of 31 people arrested in connection with the case have pleaded guilty.

Because it was the 60th anniversary of the first restitution agreement, the board meeting was moved to Washington from its usual location in New York, and the event at the Holocaust museum amounted to something of a somber celebration.

The next day, the Claims Conference board meeting was followed by a luncheon at the Hart Senate Office Building marking the 100th birthday of Raoul Wallenberg, the Swedish diplomat who saved tens of thousands of Jews in Nazi-occupied Hungary before being arrested after the war by the Soviets and then disappearing. Several U.S. congressmen and senators attended the luncheon, which was organized by The Friedlander Group. The U.S. Senate this week unanimously approved a resolution to honor Wallenberg with a Congressional Gold Medal.

Meanwhile, Claims Conference negotiators already are eyeing the next round of negotiations with Germany. Among the items on the Jewish wish list, according to Eizenstat:

* Extending Germany’s three-year, $500 million program to fund home care for elderly survivors beyond 2014;

* Increasing the payment amount from the Hardship Fund, which has gone unchanged since the 1980s;

* Changing or eliminating the income-and-asset requirements for the Article 2 Fund, which provides monthly pensions of about $370 for some 60,000 poor Holocaust survivors, so that even those survivors who are well off will receive compensation for their suffering at the hands of the Nazis;

* Considering funding for survivors of so-called open ghettos—unfenced areas where Jews were forced to live and faced restrictions on coming and going.

$70 billion on, Claims Conf. marks 60 years of reparations from Germany Read More »

The Rosner-Cohen Exchange Part II: Your Israel survey is odd; your reporting is selective

This is the second ‎part in an ongoing debate with Prof Steven M. Cohen of the Hebrew Union College, and Director of the Berman Jewish Policy Archive at NYU Wagner. The first part is here. We will be discussing many ‎issues over the next few weeks, and readers are more than welcome to ‎weigh in, send questions or comments, and take part in this conversation about ‎Jewish life in America today.

Dear Steven,‎

I suggest we take a break from the discussion on the New York study, and turn to ‎your most recent work (with Prof. Samuel Abrams) – a survey you did for ‎Workmen’s Circle. Regular Rosner readers already know that I was ‎somewhat critical of this survey. I will not repeat everything I’ve said (readers ‎can see it here), but I came pretty close to saying that maybe some shreds of ‎political agenda made it into the way the report was construed and reported.‎

What Rosner readers don’t know – but can probably guess – is that you ‎completely disagree with my analysis of the poll. They also don’t know that ‎you sent me an email, and that I sent you one back, in which we agreed to ‎have this discussion in public. To air our differences and let the readers ‎judge – or maybe one of us (I know you expect this to be me!) will change his ‎mind. So – with an open mind, I’m waiting to hear your thoughts on three ‎things:‎

‎1. What’s the big news in your new study? ‎

‎2. What else can we learn from it?‎

‎3. Where was I wrong?‎

You can do it by any order you’d like; the floor, as they say, is yours.‎

Shmuel

Dear Shmuel,‎

‎ ‎

I’ll start by answering your first question:‎

The big news from the Workmen’s Circle survey of American Jews that Sam ‎Abrams and I conducted is that non-Orthodox younger US Jews, ages 35 ‎and under, are substantially more attached to Israel than are those ages 35-‎‎44. At the same time, the younger adults’ increased emotional attachment ‎to Israel is accompanied by decreased trust or confidence in Israel’s policies ‎toward the Palestinians. (To be clear, we drew a sub-sample that set aside ‎the Orthodox and day school alumni, two groups whose engagement with ‎Israel is not thought to be “at risk.”)‎

The big news – we think – is that we have evidence of a turnaround in the frequently ‎observed long-term slide in attachment to Israel among successively younger age ‎cohorts. In our study, as in so many others, Israel attachment levels are lower among ‎those ages 35-44 than among those 45-54, who are in turn less attached than those ‎ages 55-64. But in contrast with previous studies including my own, we have the first ‎statistically significant results pointing to higher attachment among those under 35.‎

For the statistically minded: We measured Israel attachment through a composite ‎index drawing upon two questions: “How emotionally attached are you to Israel?” ‎And: “To what extent do you see yourself as pro-Israel?” Those answering both ‎questions positively (“very attached” and pro-Israel “to a great extent”) earned a score ‎of 100 on the index.‎

We believe (but are not sure) that the cumulative impact of Birthright Israel in ‎bringing so many young Jews to Israel may be coming to the fore. Should other ‎evidence of a similar nature emerge, we will have mounting support for the notion of ‎what could be called, the ‘Birthright Bump.’ That is, we may be seeing a bump ‎upward in Israel attachment for an entire cohort of young people, owing to their far ‎more frequent travel to Israel due in large part to Birthright. We felt confident enough ‎in our findings to go public for several reasons, among them is that other studies ‎‎(including one by Len Saxe and colleagues at Brandeis last year) pointed in the same ‎direction.‎

But there’s even more news in our study: The increased attachment to Israel among ‎the young adults does not seem to bring with it an increased confidence in Israel’s ‎policies and leadership in the context of the conflict with the Palestinians. Younger ‎Jews – both those under 35 and those 35-44 – express far less enthusiasm for Israel’s ‎stance in the conflict than do older Jews, especially those 65 and over. On an Index ‎we labeled, “Trust in Israeli Leaders,” the younger respondents scored about twenty ‎points lower than their parents’ age groups. The index consisted of three questions ‎pertaining to seeing Israel as truly interested in peace, seeing the Palestine Authority ‎as uninterested in peace, and favoring US support exclusively for Israel (rather than ‎US support for Palestinians or for both sides equally).‎

My colleague Sam Abrams remarked: “Apparently, while attachment to Israel and ‎trust in Israeli leaders are correlated, they are not the same sentiment. Among those ‎under 35, people in my own age demographic, Jews can be both attached to Israel and ‎assume fairly independent if not skeptical stances toward Israeli government policies.”‎

We also found that the upturn in Israel attachment is not due to increasing Jewish ‎engagement on the part of the young. Their frequency of attending synagogue services ‎largely resembles that found among those 35-44. In fact, they are less likely to report ‎that half or more of their close friends are Jewish. In other words, they’re not more ‎attached to Israel because they’re more attached to being Jewish.‎

‎ ‎

With respect to your question on what else can we learn from the study, I’ll ‎direct your attention to the previously reported analysis on Jewish vote ‎intentions. We found that Obama outpolls Romney by 59% to 27%, with 14% ‎undecided. If currently undecided voters split similarly, Obama would outpoll ‎Romney by a 68% to 32% margin among Jewish voters. Perhaps even more critically, ‎we were able to learn how Jews are deciding whom to support. The issues driving ‎the Jewish vote are economic justice including regulating financial institutions, ‎support for progressive taxation, and the argument that government should do more ‎to help the needy. Israel plays hardly any role in influencing vote intention, once ‎these other matters are taken into account. Additionally, many more Jews believe ‎President Obama shares their values than who think the same of Romney.‎

Shmuel, I think you may have missed reporting this finding. At the same time, I am of ‎course pleased that you noted the potential turnaround in young Jews attachment to ‎Israel, even though you may be contesting our finding that young Jews are not all ‎that supportive of the current Israeli government’s approach to the conflict with the ‎Palestinians. This pattern of reporting on your part does raise a question in my mind: ‎Why did you warmly greet our finding that young Jews are more attached to Israel, ‎challenge our finding of diminished trust, and ignore our finding that Israel plays ‎little role in American Jews’ presidential vote decision?‎

So, before we go on to question 3 (my contesting your contesting of our findings), ‎why don’t you give me (and your readers) some insight as to what motivates this ‎pattern of selective reception to our research. In addition, while you’re in the ‎neighborhood, I suggest you restate your objections to our findings about trust in ‎Israel’s policies since it does not behoove me to do so.‎

When you have responded, I’ll re-engage with our fruitful and friendly dialogue.‎

Steven

 

The Rosner-Cohen Exchange Part II: Your Israel survey is odd; your reporting is selective Read More »

Olmert says he has no plans to re-enter politics

Former Israeli Prime Minister Olmert, following his acquittal on the most serious corruption charges, said he does not intend to return to politics.

Olmert, speaking Thursday at a conference in Tel Aviv two days after he was acquitted on corruption charges that prompted his resignation from office four years ago, also said that he would remain a member of the Kadima party.

“I want to calm down anyone who is worried—I have no intention of re-entering politics,” Olmert reportedly said a conference of the Institute for National Security Studies. “I am not involved in politics. I deal with other issues and nothing else. I don’t have a shelf party—I am a member of Kadima.”

The Jerusalem District Court acquitted Olmert on charges of fraud, breach of trust, tax evasion and falsifying corporate records in what became known as the Talansky and Rishon Tours affairs. He was found guilty on a lesser charge of breach of trust in the Investment Center case, in which Olmert was accused of granting personal favors while he was Israel’s trade minister.

Olmert is expected to appeal the breach of trust conviction, which would carry a prison sentence and make him the first Israeli prime minister to go behind bars. He had pleaded not guilty on all charges.

In a statement made after the executive summary of the decision was read, Olmert said, “After over four years this case has finally come to its end. Four years ago the media was riddled with reports of ‘cash envelopes’ and illicit money. Well, today the court found that there was no such thing. This was not corruption, there were no cash-filled envelopes, there was no bribery, there was no illicit use of funds.”

Olmert says he has no plans to re-enter politics Read More »

Karachi through the eyes of Singapore

I have not written for a while because I was away on the East West Center Jefferson fellowship to study urban solutions. I was away for a month with a group of 14 journalists from countries like Mongolia and Indonesia, places like Seattle and Atlanta, questions like what is the future for our megacities as they continue to absorb people.

Some journalists in Pakistan with the right connections are what some people call “conference whores” or fellowship junkies – they receive the invitations but instead of sending members of their teams who deserve the exposure, they hog them. I am happy to say that my editor, Kamal Siddiqi, at The Express Tribune and publisher Bilal Lakhani make sure everyone gets a fair chance.

That said, I turned down a lot of fellowships/scholarship/visits/junkets because they were all about terrorism blah blah. I don’t give a rat’s ass about terrorism because far more pressing urban problems exist. Violence in Karachi, yes, that worries me all the time. But even these issues are tackled by trying to find solutions for the city. Is the city a place where young men feel a part of the social fabric?

I jumped at this fellowship because it was not about answers but about questions – growing questions for me about Karachi, the city that I love. And I write this blog sitting at a Starbucks off Regent Street in London, a city I hate. Envy and hate. I hate all cities that have figured it out, how to serve their populations. And then I hate Karachi’s two main parties, the PPP and MQM, for NOT changing Karachi and instead fighting among themselves.

I learnt on my one month away from Karachi that the world has moved forward so impossibly far ahead that we are going to have a hard time catching up unless we really decide to alter our destiny. In Singapore, for example, the Jefferson fellows visited the city planning department and I realised that Singapore in the 1960s was Karachi in 2012. (See picture).

The fellowship studied waste management, transport systems, energy solutions in Hawai’i, Singapore, Guangzhou, Seoul, Songdo. And at the tail end of the trip I skipped over to Hong Kong with a friend to see how that city lived and breathed.

When you have lived in Karachi long enough something will happen to you. I am frustrated by my inability to articulate this phenomenon, but to put it crudely, your sense of up goes down and your sense of down goes up. I am reminded of Richard Farina’s great Beat classic ‘Been down so long it looks like up to me’. You lose hope that it will ever be better; despite all the tweets, all the platitudes, all the yapping on TV. We all feel hopeless deep down. We run around in circles with the same kind of rhetoric but in the end we all exit in survivalist mode.

Karachi is 20 million people and growing and the people in charge have completely ignored their duty to the city. We need to overhaul our mass transit, sewage and water systems – these are just three major ones (more on the others later). Before I went on the fellowship I was caught up with the idea that the government was trapped in a deadlock. Even if it wanted to make changes, like build the Karachi circular railway, there were squatters in the way. Trying to remove them would lead to protests, violence. Does anything happen in Karachi without violence? That is our new language.

But then, I learnt in Singapore that Lee Kwan Yew, its first prime minister, oversaw the transformation of the nation state from a relatively underdeveloped colonial outpost with no natural resources into a First World Asian Tiger. In China, and yes, you can laugh later, the central government decides on something AND IT IS DONE. I agree that this is a slippery slope. But I wonder if some sacrifices need to be made to save Karachi. Who will be Karachi’s Lee Kwan Yew?

That leader would have to take a decision to go ahead with the mass transit projects. The problem with the Karachi Circular Railway is that the government flubbed up with compensation to people in earlier projects in which land needed to be cleared. That was the Lyari Expressway Project, which sent people to far-flung wastelands like Scheme 33 and Taiser Town.

But now, the debate is, can the government go ahead with this mass transit despite resistance. After all the Japanese government is footing 93% of the bill. The time is now. If we don’t have mass transit our traffic jams will get worse, and the costs will rise each day economically.

(For more details see our latest on the KCR by Saad Hasan Karachi through the eyes of Singapore Read More »

Making the Cultural Connection to Israel

I have had on my to blog list (which is long and getting longer) writing something on the cultural connection. A few recent chavayot (experiences) have gotten me motivated to begin a series of entries on contemporary Israeli culture.
I was particularly motivated after attending an evening program connected with the seminar for American Rabbis which takes place every July. One of the presenters was Arthur Green who like his co presenter David Ellenson (Dean of HUC) was not shy about criticizing current Israeli policies and expressing a deep close connection to the country.
Green was certainly a stronger critic. But he might have surprised the group in his response to a question from the audience. When asked how the Rabbis could create a greater connection to Israel among his congregants I have no doubt that many (including me) expected an answer connected to politics. Instead his response was that the American Jews should gain greater exposure for the great cultural outpouring from Israel ranging from popular culture to the Jewish scholarship as evidenced by an academic conference on kabbala he was attending.
I couldn’t agree more. The cultural output is overwhelming. Everyday I open the “galereya” section of Haaretz to find notices for art exhibits, concerts, and academic conferences open to the public, pop concerts, etc etc.
Two examples: tonight July 12 at the” title=”The Tel Aviv suburb of Holon h itself has become a center for the arts ” target=”_blank”>The Tel Aviv suburb of Holon h itself has become a center for the arts with lts of public art a cutting edge arts museum and many arts education programs….and the year round puppet theatre.
Why is the cultural connection so important? It has the potential to give a more multifaceted connection and insight with a dynamic culture rather than what is often a limited view dominated by political issues. Even if American Jews often do not share a common language with Israelis—-or the common language they share is English—there are plenty of opportunities to gain access to Israeli cultural life even without making the trip. In future blog entries I will be writing about film, literature and music.

Making the Cultural Connection to Israel Read More »

July 12, 2012

In-depth

Mearsheimer and Zakheim Discuss “Why Iran Should Get the Bomb”

Foreign Affairs presents a debate by John Mearsheimer and Dov Zakheim focusing on a controversial piece by Kenneth Waltz in which he argues that Iran should be allowed to have nuclear weapons.

Waltz wrote:

Most U.S., European, and Israeli commentators and policymakers warn that a nuclear-armed Iran would be the worst possible outcome of the current standoff. In fact, it would probably be the best possible result: the one most likely to restore stability to the Middle East.

The Man Who May Be Libya’s First Elected Leader

Vivienne Walt of TIME profiles Mahmoud Jibril, the former Gadhafi loyalist turned rebel who now leads a coalition of moderates and secularists that looks set to win the most votes in Libya’s first democratic elections in six decades.

“He was instrumental in getting international approval for the rebels, and everyone gives him credit for that,” says Sami Zaptia, managing editor of the Libya Herald, a new English-language online newspaper. Zaptia believes that Jibril’s tribal background makes him ideally suited to drawing Gaddafi’s old loyalists — including many Warfalla — into supporting the new Libya. “I don’t think you will find many people who will dispute Jibril’s skills as a planner, a strategist and a visionary.”

Turkey’s Unending Syria Problem

The crisis in Syria threatens both Turkish stability and Erdogan’s own political ambitions, writes Morton Abramowitz in the National Interest.

Syria is a major political issue, and there is much political grousing about Erdogan’s handling of the war. Turkey does not want to go to war. But Erdogan simply cannot appear weak. He continues to rant about critics of his Syrian policy, often calling the media traitors if they question his efforts. Syria also takes energy, time and resources away from critical domestic problems, notably the Kurdish issue, on which Erdogan, despite some serious effort, has been unable to find a way forward.

 

Daily Digest

  • Times of Israel: Broaching idea of comeback, Olmert says only he can lead centrist bloc

  • Haaretz: Report on ultra-Orthodox enlistment to IDF could tear Israel apart, expert says

  • Jerusalem Post: Report: US Navy deploys drones to the Persian Gulf

  • Ynet: Syria’s ambassador to Iraq ‘defects’

  • New York Times: Tehran Abuzz as Book Says Israel Killed 5 Scientists

  • Washington Post: Can diplomacy succeed with Iran and Syria?

  • Wall Street Journal: Egyptian Leader’s Visit Sends Signal to Saudis

  • July 12, 2012 Read More »

    Liberal Protestants bash Israel again — why dialogue?

    According to the ” title=”Jerusalem Post” target=”_blank”> Jerusalem Post, the Board of Deputies of British Jews may vote to sever ties to the Church of England at its next meeting. Good for them.

    Attendees at recent gatherings of liberal Protestant churches can be forgiven for wondering why Israel is always in their crosshairs. The Anglicans’ shameful vote to strengthen ties with the EAPPI comes on the heels of the Episcopal Church’s call for a negotiated two-state solution between Israelis and Palestinians, a schizophrenic vote by Presbyterians to reject a divestment resolution while boycotting products made in West Bank settlements, and the rejection by Methodists of yet another divestment initiative. It’s quite clear that these liberal leaders lack an appreciation for the Jewish state, and it’s also obvious that political activism, not divine guidance, is fueling their unhealthy Israel obsession. I can’t imagine why anyone would care what liberal Protestant committees think about Israel, and admire Jewish organizations for their patience and forbearance when dealing with them.

    The response of the Church of England’s interreligious affairs adviser to the synod’s vote was very telling: “Many Synod members abstained, not willing to dismiss EAPPI, but presumably registering that they understood the negative implications for Jewish-Christian relations of a positive vote.” In other words, the well-meaning synod voters didn’t object to the substance of the resolution, but feared that it might harm relations with the Jewish community.

    I think that we can cut to the chase on the Israel issues by asking attendees at upcoming meetings of liberal Protestants to vote on the following question: Is the Abrahamic covenant valid today? They will deny that it is. Mormons believe that the covenant remains valid, and that is why the LDS Church has sent apostles to dedicate the Land of Israel on many occasions for the gathering of the Jewish people. Jews believe in the continuing validity of the covenant as well, which is why they have worked so hard to establish and preserve their state. Mormons and Jews may disagree on what the terms of the Abrahamic covenant are and on what one needs to do to receive the blessings of the covenant, but they agree that the Abrahamic covenant is 100% in force today. As a result, you don’t see LDS leaders debating divestment from Israel out of a misguided search for “justice” and “peace.”

    There is no reason to expect that liberal Christian synods and conventions will adopt a more comprehensive view of injustice in the world in the near future. Each year brings new phraseology and new resolutions, but the underlying message is the same: The Abrahamic covenant is not valid for Jews today, and Israel is one of the worst countries in the world. Once Jews realize this, more of them will emulate the actions of the British Jewish leaders by looking elsewhere for fruitful dialogue on Israel.           

    Liberal Protestants bash Israel again — why dialogue? Read More »