fbpx

June 14, 2012

Israeli Gay Pride

June 28th, 1969. Greenwich Village, NYC. It started like any other night back then- a police raid on a gay bar. The Stonewall Inn was the daily victim. Only that night, unlike any other night before, was about to mark Gay pride for decades to come.  This was the first time the LGBT (Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) fought back as a riot began. This marked the beginning of a Gay Pride tradition, and Gay Pride celebrations take place all over the world during the month of June.

Last Friday, the 18th Israeli Gay pride parade took place in Tel Aviv – the city which became a world gay center.  In the past few years, Tel Aviv became a city of “acceptance” and “embracement”, and “openness”, as its streets are being colored during the month of June. Tens of thousands of tourists from all over the world know where to go during Gay Pride celebration, and there is no doubt the Tel Aviv parade redefines “pride”. However, despite the great success of the parade, it is very important to never forget the purpose of the march. More than a good time, colors and music, the parade is a recognition of a struggle still vivid – a struggle for equality. It may be hard to believe, but in 2012, the gay community, of all races, genders and types, does not get equal rights in many places in the western world. The openness towards the members of the LGBT community is growing with time, but the various governments still refuse to acknowledge them as equals. Gradually, more and more states allow same-sex marriage or same-sex families, but of all places, when it comes to equal rights, Israel still has a long way to come. The Israeli law shows no progress as tens of same-sex marriage law proposals have been voted down. The Israeli LGBT’s still have many hurdles to cross, including the Orthodox status quo.

As much as the Tel-Aviv parade is meaningful and shows off a true victory of light over darkness, I find it difficult to see this as a national trend. In my hometown, for instance, there’s a Gay pride parade planned for July. This was good news if it weren’t for the fact that this parade will never march, at least not with an official municipal approval. The 40% religious residents and an old fashioned community are opposing an event of such character, claiming for provocation and an exposure of a “marginal phenomenon”. They also said that if the Gay community wants equal rights, they should go to the Knesset or the parliament, and not celebrate in the streets. This sentence alone shows the thickness of parts of our society, a society where every man for himself is the rule. This quality is very non-Israeli, which is why I believe that the opponents are a very small minority group, and that what I saw in Tel- Aviv this past Friday is the future.

One of the people who stands behind the pride celebrations in Tel-Aviv during June and throughout the entire year is Yaniv Waizman, and after talking to him, I was filled with hope and pride. “The pride festival is a show of our strength as a community. It is both a reminder to the fact that there is still inequality in Israel, and also a celebration for the difference and for the acceptance of the other. In Tel-Aviv, we haven’t experienced any difficulties in issuing the celebrations, or any objections. I believe Israel is ranked high in terms of human rights and legal accomplishments for the Gay community. “As the month of June is a time for celebrations for the LGBT community worldwide, and marks a victory, it is very important to remember our part. In order to fully accomplish goals, to pass that last hurdle, everybody should unite. We, the Israeli community, proved it last year, when we brought Gilad Shalit back home. Now is the time to prove it again.

Israeli Gay Pride Read More »

Jewish organizations petition U.S. gov’t on food justice

In a petition sponsored by seven national Jewish organizations, 18,000 individuals urged the U.S. House of Representatives and the Obama administration to focus on food justice in the upcoming Farm Bill.

The petition, which has been circulating since October, was delivered on Thursday to coincide with the House Agriculture Committee’s markup of the Farm Bill in the coming weeks.

A coalition of Jewish organizations called the Jewish Farm Bill Working Group sponsored the petition. The coalition includes the American Jewish World Service, the Coalition on the Environment and Jewish Life, Hazon, the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, MAZON: A Jewish Response to Hunger, the National Council of Jewish Women and the Union for Reform Judaism.

Abby Leibman, president and CEO of MAZON, noted in a statement that the Farm Bill authorization process, which occurs every five years, gives the Jewish community “a chance to reexamine our national priorities with regard to food.”

“The Farm Bill governs the kinds and levels of assistance we provide to hungry people, helps regulate what crops are planted, establishes whether sustainable farming and conservation practices will be implemented, and influences whether our food is healthy and affordable,” Leibman said. “Each and every one of us has a stake in the Farm Bill.”

Ruth Messinger, president of the American Jewish World Service, added that the outpouring of support for the petition was a sign of the bill’s importance to the Jewish community.

“It has been evident through the petition that our constituents understand how critical it is that the United States work to enact policies that pursue long-term approaches to eradicating hunger. We cannot wait any longer,” Messinger said in the statement.

Jewish organizations petition U.S. gov’t on food justice Read More »

Aid groups urge Israel to lift Gaza blockade

Fifty international aid groups and United Nations agencies issued a joint appeal on Thursday calling on Israel to lift its blockade of the Gaza Strip, which is ruled by Hamas Islamists.

“For over five years in Gaza, more than 1.6 million people have been under blockade in violation of international law. More than half of these people are children. We the undersigned say with one voice: ‘end the blockade now,’” the petition said.

Amongst the signatories were Amnesty International, Save the Children, the World Health Organization, Oxfam, the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and five other U.N. bodies.

Israel imposed restrictions on trade to Gaza in 2001 following the outbreak of a Palestinian uprising and tightened them further in 2007 after Hamas seized power in the coastal enclave adjacent to Egypt, which also enforces a blockade.

It has relaxed them over the past two years in the face of heavy international pressure, but insists on checking all goods entering the territory to prevent arms, or weapons-making equipment, from reaching Hamas.

“All cargo going into Gaza must be checked because Gaza is controlled by Hamas, an internationally recognized terrorist organization,” said Mark Regev, spokesman for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

“Just this morning an Israeli farmer who was ploughing his field was shot at from Gaza. Is it really fair to expect Israel to remove the restriction on military use items while the regime in Gaza is as hostile and aggressive as it is to Israel?”

Hamas’s founding charter calls for the destruction of Israel, but its leadership has raised the possibility of entering into a prolonged truce with Israel after years of bloodshed.

Reporting by Crispian Balmer, Editing by Jeffrey Heller

Aid groups urge Israel to lift Gaza blockade Read More »

A rare interview with Woody Allen

I don’t know how she did it, but the Wall Street Journal’s Rachel Dodes got a one-on-one with Woody Allen. The young reporter met with the press-shy filmmaker last week at his New York office to discuss his upcoming release “To Rome With Love”, which premiered last month at the Cannes Film Festival. What she came away with is a rare, in-depth, albeit predictable dialogue with the prolific virtuoso whose latest film will serve as the opening night selection for the Jerusalem International Film Festival. It’s an ironic choice, of course, for Jerusalem, which attracts nearly 8,000 Israelis to their outdoor cinemafest under the stars (the film screens in a valley just outside the Old City), since Rome and Jerusalem have a rather sordid past (let’s just say the relationship suffered a serious setback when the Romans sacked and destroyed the Jews’ beloved Second Temple).

Among Allen’s usual pontificating about meaning and nothingness, his own perceived smallness and disinterest in modern mechanisms such as technology and movie reviews, there are some gems. On why he no longer casts himself as romantic lead: “I’m too old now, is the problem. I like to get the girl”; or why he’ll never retire: “If all the funding [for my films] dried up, I could always sit home on my bed and write”; or why he doesn’t appear on panels, at awards shows, or watch any of his movies after final cut: “It’s not healthy to either regret or luxuriate in stuff that’s in the past.”

Dodes: Some say your view is that life is pointless, and others say you’re a romantic realist who believes in being true to yourself. Which is it?

Allen: I think that’s the best you can do, but the true situation is a hopeless one because nothing does last. If we reduce it absurdly for a moment, you know the sun will burn out. You know the universe is falling apart at a fantastically accelerating rate and that at some point there won’t be anything at all. So whether you are Shakespeare or Beethoven or Michelangelo, your stuff’s not going to last. So, given that, even if you were immortal, that time is going to come. Of course, you have to deal with a much more critical problem, which is that you’re not going to last microscopically close to that. So, nothing does last. You do your things. One day some guy wakes up and gets the Times and says, “Hey, Woody Allen died. He keeled over in the shower singing. So, where do you want to have lunch today?”

Read the full interview at the Wall Street Journal

 

A rare interview with Woody Allen Read More »

PRESS RELEASE: From Los Angeles to Tel Aviv: Israel’s New Recruits

Los Angeles, CA June 12, 2012

In a beautiful garden setting in Encino, at the home of Andrea and Isaac Cohen, thirty-two young men and women, their families and close friends gathered together in celebration and to say farewell.

Farewell, because these young people are part of a group called Garin Tzabar and they have chosen to enlist in the Israeli army – the IDF.

Many of them are born in America to Israeli parents, but some kids, such as Alexi Rosenfeld made the decision to enlist purely because he is a true Zionist. “I can’t think of anything more selfless and rewarding than to serve my Jewish homeland and continue to fight for the State of Israel and a country I call my real home,” said Alexi proudly as his mother, Jackie Sharpe, chair of the event
stood by her son’s side.

More than 170 people attended the event. A “star-studded lineup” of the Jewish community shared personal stories and touching messages to the group of new recruits, including Michal Waisburd from the Israel Ministry of Defense, Simon Etehad, VP and Board member of Friends of the IDF, Shawn Evenhain, Chair of the ILC, Andrew Cushnir, Executive Vice President – Chief Programing Officer of The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles. Although Rabbi David Wolpe could not attend in person, he recorded a video message which was shared. The Tzofim Caravan, appearing all over the US, also performed, ending the event with a beautiful rendition of Hatikva.

Orit Mizner, director of the Southwest region for Friends of Israel Scouts takes her job very seriously. “From the moment I interview and accept one of these kids into the Garin Tzabar program I invest in them everything possible to help them make the right decision for themselves and to realize a dream they have inside them to be part of something bigger than each one of them,” she said.

“Each one of these kids is like my own and we will be connected as a result forever. This is a huge personal step when most of their friends are thinking about college and who to share a dorm room with,” adds Orit.

On August 13th, an EL AL charter flight bound for Tel Aviv, starting in Los Angeles and picking up passengers in New York, will fly 150 “new” soldiers home.

The Los Angeles Garin Tzabar 2012 will make their new home at kibbutz Nir Yitzhak in the Negev. They begin with three months ulpan and getting to know their surroundings and then many will be drafted in October or November.

Jackie Sharpe is spearheading a new support group for the families of Garin Tzabar and will soon be launching a website and weekly blog.

For more information on Garin Tzabar contact Jackie Sharpe or Orit Mizner at garintzabar2012@gmail.com or southwest@israelscouts.org

PRESS RELEASE: From Los Angeles to Tel Aviv: Israel’s New Recruits Read More »

Syrian town deserted, burned after clashes

The Syrian town of Haffeh was smoldering and nearly deserted on Thursday after days of clashes between government forces and rebels, while activists reported more army assaults on pro-opposition areas across the country.

United Nations monitors had been trying to enter the town after several days of fighting but were forced to turn back on Tuesday when a crowd attacked them.

They finally gained access on Thursday to find state buildings burnt down, shops abandoned and a body lying in the street. Smoke rose from destroyed buildings and burnt-out cars littered the roads. There were signs of heavy bombardment.

Only a handful of residents could be seen and one man said 26,000 people had fled.

Rebels pulled out of the town this week saying the thousands of remaining citizens risked being killed in cold blood, a warning echoed by the United States.

Violence has surged in recent weeks after government forces and allied militia launched offensives to regain territories controlled by the opposition and rebels abandoned a ceasefire negotiated by international envoy Kofi Annan in his efforts to ease the conflict between President Bashar al-Assad and the movement fighting to end his family’s four decade rule.

The British-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which has a network of activists across the country, said 44 people were killed on Thursday. Most were civilians and rebels but there were also three security personnel among the dead, it added.

Assad’s forces have used troops, tanks and helicopters to hit rebel-controlled suburbs near the capital Damascus, parts of eastern Deir al-Zor province and villages in the northern and western parts of Aleppo province, near the Turkish border.

In Douma, about 10 miles from Damascus, activists said tanks had entered the city outskirts and government forces were battling rebel fighters. At least two people were killed and 15 wounded, they added.

“It is a war today,” said an activist who called himself Ziad, speaking on Skype over the thump of shelling and the rattle of machinegun fire. “There are 10 tanks on the outskirts, but the rebels have destroyed one of them.”

The uprising against Assad’s rule began as a peaceful pro-democracy movement in March 2011 but in the face of a crackdown by his forces has turned into an armed insurgency.

“There has been a dangerous escalation of armed violence across Syria,” said Sausan Ghosheh, spokeswoman for the U.N. monitors observing the now-collapsed ceasefire.

“They (residents) want the violence to stop and so do we, but the U.N. Supervision Mission cannot impose a ceasefire. The path of non-violence is a choice for the welfare of all Syrians.”

The United Nations says more than 10,000 people have been killed by government forces, while Syria says at least 2,600 members of the military and security forces have been killed by what it calls foreign-backed “Islamist terrorists”.

State news channel Syria TV said security forces had arrested a man who was part of Jabhat al-Nusra, a little known militant group that has claimed several suicide bombings in Syria. It said the man was planning to blow himself up at a mosque on Friday.

World powers are divided over the next move.

Russia and China, both permanent members of the U.N. Security Council with veto power, have blocked efforts by Western powers to condemn Assad or call for his removal.

Diplomats said world powers were working towards holding a crisis meeting on Syria in Geneva on June 30 to try to get the Annan plan back on track.

IRAN THE STICKING POINT

Annan, who represents the United Nations and the Arab League, has called for a Contact Group to be convened as soon as possible, but the United States is opposed to the involvement of Iran, Syria’s main ally in the region.

Two diplomats told Reuters they were hoping to have a meeting on the 30th, but a third said Iran’s participation was still a sticking point.

Annan’s spokesman Ahmad Fawzi said the envoy was having urgent meetings to reach consensus on the shape and formula for the meeting. If one was held, it would aim to “give teeth” to the Annan plan, not to create a new one, he said.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Tuesday Washington had information Russia was supplying Syria with helicopters, which have been used in government assaults on towns and cities.

Syria’s ambassador to Moscow told Reuters on Thursday that Russia was “not delivering any helicopters to Syria”.

Additional reporting by Dominic Evans in Beirut, Khaled Yacoub Oweis in Amman, Chris Buckley in Beijing, Nastassia Astrasheuskaya and Thomas Grove in Moscow, Stephanie Nebehay in Geneva; Writing by Oliver Holmes; Editing by Andrew Heavens

Syrian town deserted, burned after clashes Read More »

Time running out for Annan’s Syria peace plan, Britain’s U.N. envoy says

Britain’s U.N. envoy said on Thursday time was running out for international mediator Kofi Annan’s plan to bring peace to Syria and that the U.N. Security Council needs to take “much tougher action” to enforce the six-point strategy.

Violence has surged in recent weeks after an April 12 ceasefire negotiated by Annan failed to take hold. Annan’s plan calls for an end to all violence by government and rebel forces, aid access, and dialogue between the government and opposition aimed at starting a political transition for the country.

“We’re very focused on the moment on imposing, making live, the Kofi Annan six-point plan,” Britain’s U.N. ambassador, Mark Lyall Grant, told reporters. “We are calling on the Syrian regime to begin to implement the commitments … So far it has not done so; instead it is brutally killing its people.”

“We’re seeing a series of massacres day after day right across Syria,” he said. “So time is clearly running out for the Kofi Annan plan but all our energies at the moment are focused on making that plan work.”

An uprising against President Bashar al-Assad and his family’s four-decade rule began as a peaceful pro-democracy movement in March 2011 but in the face of a crackdown by his forces has turned into an armed insurgency.

The United Nations says more than 10,000 people have been killed by government forces, while Syria says at least 2,600 members of the military and security forces have been killed by what it calls foreign-backed “Islamist terrorists.”

World powers are divided over the next move. Russia and China, both permanent members of the U.N. Security Council with veto power, have blocked efforts by Western powers to condemn Assad or call for his removal.

“It is time for the Security Council to take much tougher action to enforce the Kofi Annan plan,” Lyall Grant said.

French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said on Thursday that one option under consideration at the council was a no-fly zone, after increasing reports of Syrian forces using helicopter gunships to fire on rebel strongholds, and U.S. concern that Russia was selling Syria more helicopters.

Lyall Grant made clear they were not considering military action, which council diplomats say Russia would almost certainly veto.

“We’re not focusing on that sort of measure at the moment,” he said.

U.N. diplomats have said that the five permanent members of U.N. Security Council – Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States – would hold high-level talks on Syria on the sidelines of next week’s summit meeting of the Group of 20 club of powerful developed and developing nations in Mexico.

Among the issues they will discuss is a possible council resolution that would impose sanctions on Damascus, envoys say.

Reporting by Michelle Nichols and Louis Charbonneau; Editing by Bill Trott

Time running out for Annan’s Syria peace plan, Britain’s U.N. envoy says Read More »

An Israeli Climber Saves a Turkish Climber on Mount Everest

Ever since the disaster on Mount Everest in 1996 as documented by Jon Krakauer in his bestselling book Into Thin Air, I have wondered what kind of person would need to climb the tallest mountain in the world (29,029 feet; 8,848 meters).

I once asked my brother who is an avid naturalist and hiker, likes altitudinous places, and who is adventurous but not crazy, if he had ever considered climbing Everest.

Thankfully, he said, “No!”

“Are you certain?” I pursued.

“Yes. No way!” And so I stopped worrying.

May is the time of year when people who like pushing beyond their limitations may try for the summit of Everest. The Guardian reported last month a remarkable event that took place on the mountain: an Israeli climber, Nadav Ben Yehuda, saved a Turkish-American climber, Aydin Irmak, and “carried [Irmak] on his back for eight hours.”

To appreciate the magnitude of this selfless and highly unusual feat, which Ben Yehuda characterized as “automatic” (he is a former IDF soldier and was trained never to leave a fellow soldier injured or dying on the battleground), note this passage from the blog accompanying the article describing the physical and mental effects on a human being at that elevation and the ethical challenges that come with being there:

“The biological reality of climbing 8000m+ high mountains is that when you’re in the death zone you are burning 13,000 calories a day. The lack of oxygen will have you suffering from hypoxia, it will prevent you from eating as all your blood will be diverted to keep your muscles oxygenated, you will most likely be hallucinating. You do not have a few days in the death zone, you have one day and if you have to stay overnight up on the mountain you are most likely dead anyway. You are starving, you are dying on your feet, and most people can barely manage to lift one foot ahead of the other on the ascent. If you stop to help someone and they can’t walk then they are dead and any effort you make to save them could see you dead as well. It is grim, it is horrible, but that’s the way it is. Oxygen bottles help but they’re heavy and need to be carefully rationed. You get a trickle of extra oxygen to help you along but it is nothing like breathing seaside air. The real problem with Everest is that it’s filled with amateur climbers who don’t respect the mountain and the risks involved. The ethical dilemma isn’t whether or not to stop and help someone on Everest. At that point it’s too late. People will do what they can but unless they possess superhuman features then what they can do is very little. No one is getting carried down off the mountain. The dilemma as I see it is whether to attempt the climb in the first place, knowing that it is littered with bodies and that it’s going to be filled with amateur climbers who will put themselves, their Sherpas, and their fellow climbers at risk.”

Nadav Ben Yehuda is an extraordinary individual to have even attempted to climb this mountain. That he saved another human being in the way he did is even more unusual. And given the enmity created between Turkey and Israel by the Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who is one of the world’s most relentless and unfair critics and haters of Israel, the story is even more noteworthy.

However, it is likely that Nadav had no idea that Aydin is an American-Turk. Nadav was simply a climber and he saw another climber in desperate need. Selflessly, he responded and saved a life at the risk of his own.

From whence came his strength on that mountain to carry another human being for eight hours? Who knows?

From whence came his moral fortitude to dispense with the ethic that says ‘each man for himself?’ Clearly, his training as a soldier in the IDF buttressed by the ethics of his nation that emphasizes that the fate of one is the fate of all.

From the top of the earth, far above the fray of distrust, politics and tribe, Nadav Ben Yehuda acted the life of a tzadik, a wholly righteous man!

To Nadav Ben Yehuda—Kol hakavod! You make me proud!

An Israeli Climber Saves a Turkish Climber on Mount Everest Read More »

Interfaith relations: do the math!

Albert and Tony were best friends who grew up in each other’s homes.  Albert’s Jewish mother sent him off to school each day with the question, “Albert, do you have your books?”  Tony’s Italian mother sent him off to school each morning with the query, “Tony, do you have your lunch?”

I heard this true story last week at a gathering of evangelical and Jewish leaders in Washington, DC.  Tony shared this charming childhood tale to introduce his presentation on how Jews and evangelical Christians view the Israel-Palestinian conflict.  I share it to illustrate the commonalities and differences of two faith communities. Jews and evangelical Christians share a holy book in common—the Hebrew Bible, a.k.a. the Old Testament.  And we share a belief in the efficacy of interfaith dining—the bonds of friendship and fellowship that develop when we “break bread” together.

Over the course of two days, participants in the fourth Evangelical-Jewish National Conversation discussed and debated a range of scholarly and practical topics.  We analyzed faith affirmations and the threats to religious liberty in America.  We surveyed evangelical theological positions on the Jewish people and its covenant with God.  We devoted two sessions to the Middle East conflict and the hot-button issue of how to and not to criticize Israel.  While many evangelical pastors and their congregants are strong supporters of Israel, our conversation focused on evangelicals who are critical of Israeli policies.  The discourse was heartfelt, honest and at times raw and intense.

We also explored the seminal

Jewish Annotated New Testament

and its emerging impact on Jewish and evangelical readers.  This session reiterated a theme that I hear frequently when I speak to Jewish audiences: Why would a group of distinguished Jewish scholars write essays about the books of the New Testament? Why should Jews learn about Christianity?  Who cares what “they” believe and practice?

My answer is quite simple—do the math!  I have always marveled at our proclivity for math and the astonishing number of Jews who have won prizes in mathematics and allied disciplines.  Do the math in our nation.  According to the latest Pew Forum “U.S. Religious Landscape Survey,” 1.7% of American adults identify as Jewish, while 26.3% of adults call themselves evangelicals.  Nearly one-half of all Protestants in the United States self-identify as evangelical Christians.  Whether our interfaith outreach is prompted by self-interest, altruism, or both motivations, we serve the Jewish people well when we engage our evangelical neighbors in meaningful dialogue.

As Jews, we often lament that Christians do not understand our practices and beliefs.  If we expect Christians to respect us, then we need to know much more about Christianity, especially evangelical Christianity.  To that end, we must appreciate the following:

  • The wide variety of evangelical flavors and their respective theologies and belief systems.  Evangelicals dislike being painted in broad brush strokes just as much as Jews recoil when non Jews do this to us.
  • Unconditional love of Israel is a core tenet of many evangelicals; others do not share this belief.  Many evangelicals promote domestic agendas that put them at odds with large swaths of the Jewish community; others do not.  We need to be thoughtful, nuanced and strategic to decide when and how to partner with evangelical Christians on complex matters of religion and politics.
  • Catholics and Jews have had nearly five decades since Vatican II and Nostra Aetate to refine our theological and inter-group relations; Jewish-evangelical dialogue is in its infancy.  One lesson we have learned from other interfaith partnerships is that there will be numerous bumps and obstacles along the way.  The challenge we face is how to respond to these setbacks and foster a healthy, evolving relationship with evangelicals.
  • Faith communities and their leaders have multiple agendas and reasons for doing what they do.  Jewish relations and concerns are not always at the top of the evangelical agenda.  Believe it or not, it’s not always about us!

As we engage in interfaith work, we must never forget the first nineteen centuries of relations between Christians and Jews.  They were marked by anti-Semitism, persecution, and hatred, much of it religiously induced and carried out in the name of the Prince of Peace.  They were filled with blood libels, accusations of well poisoning, devil worship, host desecration and other acts that led to pogroms, murder, rape, and the forced conversion of entire Jewish communities.  This is a bitter legacy whose logical and terrifying conclusion was the systematic destruction of six million Jewish men, women and children at the hands of the Nazis and their henchmen.

My experiences with evangelical Christians convince me that they are painfully aware of this history and yearn to do teshuvah (repentance) in word and deed.  It is up to us to respond to their quest with faith, understanding, and above all sekhel (practical wisdom).  The rabbinic sage Ben Azzai taught that the most important verse of the Torah is Genesis 5:1: “These are the generations of Adam.  When God created human beings, God made them in the divine image.”

Christians and Jews alike affirm that we are all created in the image of God.  Each of us is a child of God.  To love God is to act with love, kindness and compassion towards God’s children.  This is what the Holy One requires of us.  This is what our respective faiths demand of us.  This is what our fellowmen and women expect of us.  This is both the promise and the challenge of Jewish-evangelical relations.


Rabbi Mark S. Diamond is Executive Vice President, The Board of Rabbis of Southern California, The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles.  He can be reached at BoardofRabbis@JewishLA.org.

Interfaith relations: do the math! Read More »

‘The Tools’: Spirituality for screenwriters

There’s a surprising new cure for writer’s block circulating among Hollywood’s elite. But, shhh, don’t tell, God is much more effective when disguised as a “higher force,” a less-loaded term for a religion-phobic environment. 

At least that’s the way a pair of Hollywood psychotherapists, Barry Michels and Phil Stutz, regard the God figure in their new book, “The Tools” (Random House: $25), which promises to transform lives by way of a Jungian-inspired “new spirituality.”

Although you wouldn’t know this if you read a March 2011 profile of the pair in The New Yorker, which noted the 12 or 13 Oscars won by their patients but mentioned variations on the word spiritual only twice (once in a quote), and allowed a description of the therapists’ self-help system as “a prosperity gospel.”

But really, it is a gospel for connecting to the beyond. The book advocates the use of tools with names like “Active Love,” “The Reversal of Desire” and “Inner Authority,” which can be employed in response to an individual’s problem. Feeling a fiery anger flare when your spouse won’t do as asked? Practicing Active Love will connect you to “Outflow,” an infinite, spiritual force filled with goodness and light.

While true prosperity gospels, like “The Secret,” consider the individual’s attitude toward a problem as the key to solving it, Stutz and Michels want to help their patients change behavior — and quick. A tool, they say, is much more than an attitude adjustment: “The most profound value of a tool is that it takes you beyond what happens inside your head. It connects you to a world infinitely bigger than you are,” they write. In order to access this “higher world,” you must use the tools. They’re the new LSD.

Stutz and Michels are hardly the first psychotherapists to concern themselves with the realm of the spirit. Carl Jung was preoccupied with the cosmos, and Otto Rank (born Otto Rosenfeld), a close colleague of Sigmund Freud, focused his post-Freudian work on the psychology of the soul. Concern with how human beings operate in the world is integral to both psychology and religion — the Greek word psyche has been interpreted to mean “life,” “spirit,” even “ghost” and is equated with the soul in much of Greek mythology and philosophy, including that of Plato and Aristotle. It requires a certain amount of chutzpah, however, for two admittedly secular Jews to offer up a new spiritual system.

“I can’t believe in something because someone tells me to,” Michels said about his main problem with religion. “I have to believe in it because I experience it.”

In the modern Western world, so it goes, the individual is everything.

“All that we do is give people tools, and then we leave them to come to their own conclusions about what’s right,” Michels said. “Whereas religion is much more prescriptive.”

Stutz added: “The individual is paramount now, whether we like it or not. So whatever is going to happen has to happen through the individual. You have to be free to make your own decisions. This doesn’t obviate organized religion at all; it’s just, like, another track.”

But their book’s focus on achieving self-realization can seem a bit gauzy in the face of core religious values like altruism. And it lends credence to the argument that spirituality without religion is just an exercise in narcissism. Will using “The Tools” lead to better human beings or just assuage embattled egos?

“That’s the $64,000 question,” Stutz said. “How do you both be an individual that’s self-absorbed, and at the same time harmonize with the community? And the answer is sacrifice, but it has to be sacrifice that’s freely willed.”

Both Stutz and Michels had personal struggles that led to spiritual breakthroughs. In his late 20s, Stutz battled an undiagnosable but debilitating malaise that left him unable to leave his house or office. He was forced, he said, into an intensely introspective “inner world,” where his imagination was free to develop the concept behind the tools. Michels, who said that “faith was an f-word” in his childhood home, had a prescient dream that came true. But when the exhilaration of his own clairvoyance faded, he was left depressed. How would he recapture the magic of that spiritual high?

That’s when he stumbled into one of Stutz’s seminars and began using the tools himself and with his patients. Eventually he and Stutz became close colleagues, and Michels helped improve and refine the tools. They don’t worry that once their patients learn the tools, they’ll no longer need the up-to-$400-per-hour therapy they provide. Nor do they consent to the idea that long-term therapy means the tools aren’t working.

“Our idea is evolution, not cure,” Stutz said.

The notion that psychotherapy should be limited in duration is, they maintain, a canard.

“It’s also not really respectful of the deeply mysterious nature of human beings, you know?” Michels said. “A person can be going through something for a year and really need help, and then just kind of rocket out of that stage into a stage where they’re functioning much better. And then they could go through something else, and it doesn’t mean they’ve done anything wrong or that they’ve stopped using tools, it means that they’re evolving.”

Their main goal, both men said, is to help their patients find meaning in adversity.

“We’ve become a society that really craves comfort and anesthetizes itself from pain,” Michels said. “But if you can handle the uncertainty of the outside world, of your own fate, you actually become more creative. You can tap into deeper resources inside of you, because you’re willing to take risks because you know that life is risk.”

As Torah teaches, in an uncertain world, the best tool upon which one can depend is God.

‘The Tools’: Spirituality for screenwriters Read More »