fbpx

May 23, 2012

Tel Aviv protest against African migrants turns violent

A demonstration in south Tel Aviv against illegal African migrants turned violent.

More than a thousand protesters gathered Wednesday in the Hatikvah neighborhood carrying signs reading “South Tel Aviv a refugee camp” and “Infiltrators, leave our home.”

Protesters attacked African migrants who passed the demonstration, and smashed the windshield of a car carrying three migrants. They also set trash bins on fire and threw firecrackers at police, Ynet reported.

At least nine protesters were arrested.

Protests also were held Wednesday in Bnei Brak, Ashdod, Ashkelon and Eilat.

Israel’s Justice Ministry announced Wednesday that migrant workers from South Sudan could be returned to their country after it is established that they are not eligible for political asylum.

More than 50,000 African migrants and asylum seekers are living in Tel Aviv alone, according to government reports. Most entered through the border with Sinai.

On Sunday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that the surge of illegal African migrants into Israel “threatens national security and identity.” Last week, Interior Minister Eli Yishai told Army Radio that most African migrants in Israel are involved in criminal activity and should be imprisoned and deported to their countries of origin.

Tel Aviv protest against African migrants turns violent Read More »

It is very dangerous to suggest that areas of the world should be ‎Judenrein

Dr. Barry A. Kosmin of Trinity College, author of a survey of European Jewish leaders and ‎opinion formers, discusses the challenges facing the Jewish communities of Europe.

European Jews are more concerned about a demographic decline today compared to the previous survey, and believe that mixed marriages pose one of the gravest threats to the community – yet when they are asked which action-items should be prioritized by the community, they rank “developing an effective policy on intermarriage” as last on their list. Does this make sense?‎

Well Jewish leaders are no more bound to be logical or consistent than other people. ‎But I think this gap indicates their difficulty in dealing with the divisive social issues ‎that arise from intermarriage such as Jewish status questions and the education of ‎children of intermarriages. ‎

‎The obvious and logical policy response to demographic decline is more emphasis ‎on retention and recruitment. Yet if the cause of the loss is mainly due to ‎intermarriage, then this raises other divisive communal issues that produce ‎denominational tensions.‎

‎So the real problem is ambivalence about “developing effective policy.”  Most of ‎these countries have an established Orthodox rabbinate which will not sacrifice ‎Halakhic norms for positive demographic solutions. So in order to avoid a ‎Kulturkampf, which will split their communities, the leaders tend to flag the problem ‎as demographic and reluctantly admit there is no viable, pluralistic consensus ‎solution worth considering.

‎Supporting the State of Israel also doesn’t rank very high on the list ‎- but 84% of West-European respondents think that Israel is “critical to sustaining Jewish life in Europe”. So why not make it a higher priority?‎

Again the answer is the leaders’ ambivalence and caution. Israel involvement on the ‎political and personal levels is an important aspect of European Jewish life today but ‎again it is a divisive issue – not only about the peace process but also regarding the ‎power of the Israeli Chief Rabbinate and the Orthodox religious establishment. The ‎responses show that there is an acknowledgement that the community leaders do not ‎have the power to do much to influence Israeli Government policies or local reactions ‎to it by Jews or gentiles. ‎

As leaders their policy priorities lie in areas where they have executive authority to ‎influence outcomes so their responses are quite realistic.

Judging by your study, is seems quite strange to ask Eastern Europeans and Western Europeans the same questions. The answers are so different – and I’d be happy if you can highlight some such differences – so why do these two ‎groups share the same study?‎

I don’t accept this assessment. In fact the differences between East and West on ‎most issues are not large and the gap is narrowing. The great value of creating a time ‎series such as this survey is that one can see how differences change over time.‎

One particular issue that is of historical significance in the European context is that ‎leaders in Western Europe are more concerned about rising anti-Semitism than those ‎in the East. This is related to the presence of more Muslims in Western Europe.  This ‎in turn ties into the Israel question.  Currently Easterners are less critical and more ‎enthusiastic in their support than Westerners. This is probably related to the lower ‎level of anti-Israel sentiment in the media and public life in the former Eastern bloc.‎

Another interesting phenomenon is that the Easterners seem to becoming a little ‎more traditional and Westerners are becoming more secular so that again the ‎regional differences are eroding.

You didn’t ask a question about Jewish European view of the American Jewish community – why?‎

This survey was about practical issues that impinge on the community life in Europe ‎and assessments of policy options.  So views about American Jews are irrelevant to ‎its aims. Moreover many Europeans do not know much about the American ‎community as they may not have visited it. The same would go in reverse for asking ‎American Jewish leaders about Europe.

You have very few Haredi respondents – is it because they were not cooperative, because you didn’t think it’s important, or for another reason? And how ‎does such an absence impact the outcome of the study?‎

Well there are not large numbers of Haredim in Europe today especially in the ‎category of “leaders and opinion formers.”  ‎

The medium is also the message. This was an on-line survey and many Haredim have ‎reservations about using the internet.  ‎

Finally, the opinions of Haredim on most of the issues we surveyed are well-known ‎and fixed.  Moreover they are a hierarchical group and my experience is that they will ‎advise any investigator to talk to their Rebbe for an authoritative answer. 

If the community needs changing, what could be the “drivers of change” that respondents specify, and do you think their choice of drivers makes sense?‎

Some drivers of change are beyond the power of local leaders to influence e.g. the ‎national economy. One feature of life today is mobility. Young Jews move around ‎from region to region or across borders for study and jobs. The young also adopt ‎new ideas and technologies faster than others. The leaders also value the role and ‎efficacy of institutions to effect Jewish social life.  ‎

This is perhaps why the respondents distinguished groups of people as the drivers ‎of change – the lay leadership, the professional leadership and young people in that ‎order.‎

‎Reading this survey one wonders: Should anyone be investing in such a declining Jewish community – would it not be better to just be blunt about it and tell ‎Jews that there seems to be no future for Jews in Europe? ‎

This is a very provocative statement. Outside financial investment is minimal these ‎days except for support of the elderly poor Shoah survivors. Personally I’m reluctant ‎to tell over one million Jews in 32 countries what they should or should not do. Now ‎that the totalitarian regimes have been displaced they are free citizens and capable ‎of deciding for themselves where they want to live.  ‎

Moreover it is very dangerous to suggest that areas of the world – cities like Paris, ‎London, Rome or Budapest with large and historic Jewish communities – should be ‎Judenrein.  In the U.S., communities like Detroit and Cleveland have smaller Jewish ‎populations and are also in numerical decline but I doubt you would make the same ‎argument about abandoning them. ‎

The point is that numbers are not everything in Jewish life today. Obviously there is a ‎certain point at which size matters for viability in terms of membership and ‎audiences. However,  there is a visible Jewish cultural revival in Europe as in the U.S. ‎‎– books, films, art, publications, festivals of all kind and of course Jewish education ‎of all types.‎

When it comes to considering the impact of numbers you should bear in mind that ‎the small community of Troyes in France with less than 100 Jews produced Rashi ‎and that Vilna – the Jerusalem of Lithuania – in its heyday had a Jewish population of ‎only 60,000. ‎

There is also a political or diplomatic value in having Jewish communities in lots of ‎countries who as constituents and citizens can voice Jewish concerns to their ‎nations’ political leaders e.g. on the Middle East.‎

It is very dangerous to suggest that areas of the world should be ‎Judenrein Read More »

Opinion: The philanthropist

Eli Broad’s new book is called “The Art of Being Unreasonable.”

When I met the billionaire philanthropist and civic leader at his office recently, I mentioned to him

that in 2007 The Jewish Journal published a story on him with the headline “An ‘Unreasonable’ Man on an Urgent Mission.” 

“This is clearly not a new thing for you,” I said. 

Any number of articles about Broad paint him as demanding, driven, controlling. But as the book makes clear, Broad sees those attributes as essential to his enormous success. 

Written with former Los Angeles Times reporter Swati Pandey, the book follows a popular formula, using Broad’s biography to offer a combination of business advice and self-help tips. Anyone starting or running a business or philanthropy should pay attention to Broad’s five-fold path to unreasonableness: Pursue the untried; do your research; revise expectations upward; take smart risks; and give back.  

One of just a handful of wealthy philanthropists dedicated to his hometown of Los Angeles, Broad has made an enormous mark on culture, philanthropy and education here.  

The Walt Disney Concert Hall, the Broad Stage, the upcoming Broad Foundation museum and the entire Grand Avenue project downtown are the most visible examples of his city-building. The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation is also deeply involved in improving K-12 education throughout the United States.

So when we sit down in his large, modern art-filled office on the 12th floor of a Westwood high-rise, I have two main questions for Broad: Why don’t more of L.A.’s wealthy contribute to the life of their city? And, how did he become the kind of man who does? 

As to the first, Broad said, “There’s not the same sense of place here as there are in other cities, like New York or San Francisco.”

Added to that, people in L.A.’s highest-profile industry — entertainment — don’t get involved in city-building as he believes they should.  

When Broad tells me that part of L.A.’s problem is that it has no center, I ask him if companies like his own KB Home, which brought suburban homeownership to the masses, aren’t partly to blame.

“Other cities have suburbs,” he responds. “They still have a core.”

For well over a decade, Broad has dedicated himself to developing a new cultural core along downtown’s Grand Avenue; he is also interested in taking over another core: the city’s main daily newspaper.  

Broad said a partnership could take the Los Angeles Times out of the bankruptcy wrought by the “foolishness” of Sam Zell and give the city the newspaper it deserves, one whose owners, editors and writers are “passionate about L.A.”

As for where his philanthropic impulse comes from, Broad, in his book at least, traces it back to his parents.

I say “at least” because in person Broad made clear through clipped, monosyllabic answers which questions he’s most comfortable with. The Jewish ones weren’t among them.

Perhaps not surprisingly, Broad is often referred to as “the son of Lithuanian immigrants.”

Not quite.

The Brod, as their name was originally spelled, and Jacobson families lived in the towns of Pren and Vilnius. His parents immigrated first to the Bronx, where Eli was born in 1933, and later Detroit, where he was raised. Their lives revolved around their small five-and-dime store and the Workmen’s Circle, the leftist Jewish organization. They spoke Yiddish and English at home — Broad told me he still speaks some Yiddish — and sent their son to Hebrew school.

He said his charitable roots stem from the fact that his parents, though far from wealthy, were generous with what they could spare: “time and passion.”

Broad spoke of his maternal uncle Joseph Jacobson, who helped found The Ben Shemen Youth Village in Palestine, a refuge for children from Eastern Europe whose graduates include President Shimon Peres and Haim Saban.

Broad himself, a longtime member of University Synagogue, only gives a fraction of his philanthropy to Jewish causes.

“It’s not my focus,” he said tersely. “There are other people with a passion for that.”

Broad’s clear passion, as is evident from the 10-by-8-foot Sean Scully abstract hanging outside his office, is modern art.

And when Broad talks about policy, he is positively animated. 

We talked about the awful state of California education. He’s not anti-union, he said — he was once a United Auto Workers member — but he handed me an article showing the teachers’ union as a clear impediment to positive change. 

What one thing would he advise L.A.’s next mayor to do to better education?

“You have to take control of the system,” he said. “That’s what happened in New York, in Chicago. The mayor takes charge.”

Didn’t our mayor try that? I asked.

Broad sighed, allowing himself a look between disappointment and disdain.

“That’s a long story,” he said.

I wanted to return to the reasons why he seemed to put such a distance between himself and the Jewish community, to ask him if it was unreasonable to see that just as the art he loves stems from a historical context, a Jew comes from a Jewish history — he comes from something — and that something needs to be valued, preserved, funded, passed down. I wanted to say that, but frankly I didn’t think I’d get anywhere.

So instead I asked him which politician he believed could get us out of our economic doldrums and political stalemate.

“Mike Bloomberg,” Broad said, “but he couldn’t get elected. He’s a 5-foot-7-inch Jew and a social liberal.”

Why don’t you run? I ask.

“I’m a 5-foot-9-inch Jew,” Broad said.

And then Eli Broad laughed.

Opinion: The philanthropist Read More »

Shawn Green to play for Israel in World Baseball Classic

Shawn Green enjoyed quite the professional baseball career: In 13 seasons, he clubbed 328 home runs, drove in 1,070 runs, batted .283, was a two-time All-Star and retired in 2007 holding or sharing seven Major League records. The former Dodger also twice refused to play on Yom Kippur.

He isn’t finished yet. Green now will come out of retirement to play for Team Israel in the World Baseball Classic (WBC) qualifiers in November, according to team manager Brad Ausmus. Green is eligible because Diaspora Jews can play for Israel.

“It would be an honor,” Green said in 2011, referring to playing for Israel. “If it fit into my life situation, I’d love to do it.”

Ausmus, a former All-Star catcher for the Dodgers, said Gabe Kapler has also committed to play. He’s hoping Ryan Braun, Kevin Youkilis and Ian Kinsler will join the lineup.

The WBC is a quadrennial international baseball tournament sanctioned by the International Baseball Federation and created by Major League Baseball, its players union and other professional baseball leagues and players unions around the world. Japan won the first two, in 2005 and 2009.

Israel is in a qualifying group with France, South Africa and Spain, and will play its games in Jupiter, Fla. Sixteen countries will compete in the qualifying round, and the top four teams will advance to the WBC.

“I know that baseball is in its infancy in Israel,” Ausmus told Sports Illustrated. “To me that is a kind of way to bridge the gap between American Jews and Israelis.”

Green will turn 40 on Nov. 10, and it remains to be seen how well he will perform after five years away from the game. He certainly has the bona fides. He hit 40 or more home runs three times, including 49 in 2001. He collected at least 100 RBIs four times, scored at least 100 runs four times and led the league in doubles, extra-base hits and total bases.

Perhaps his most memorable game was May 23, 2002, at Milwaukee, when he hit four home runs, had 19 total bases (breaking a record that had stood since 1954), six hits, five runs scored and five extra-base hits.

His other memorable moments came in 2001, when, for the first time in 415 games, he wasn’t in the lineup because he observed Yom Kippur. Three years later, with the Dodgers in a pennant race with the rival Giants, Green again announced he would not play on the holiest day of the Jewish calendar.

Green’s actions place him with the likes of Hank Greenberg, Sandy Koufax and, to a lesser extent, Al Rosen. Greenberg attended Yom Kippur services in a Detroit synagogue in 1935. Koufax famously refused to pitch Game 1 of the 1965 World Series. Rosen played for Cleveland in 1954 and had said he would observe Yom Kippur and not play during the World Series. However, Cleveland lost the series before the holy day.

Shawn Green to play for Israel in World Baseball Classic Read More »

Palestinian terror cells uncovered

Israel’s Shin Bet security service said it discovered several Palestinian terror cells operating in the Hebron area.

One of the cells is affiliated with Hamas and another planned to kidnap Jews living in the Kiryat Arba area, according to the Shin Bet. Another cell detonated an explosive near an Israeli car using a cell phone.

Earlier this week, the Shin Bet announced that it had arrested nine Palestinians from the Ramallah area for attempting to kidnap an Israeli woman and her young daughter after surrounding the car in which they were riding.

Palestinian terror cells uncovered Read More »

Romney to meet with Jewish donors

Mitt Romney is meeting with about 30 major Jewish donors to his presidential campaign as part of a “constituents day.”

Romney, the former Massachusetts governor and all-but-certain Republican nominee for president, will meet for about an hour with the donors in Boston on Thursday.

A donor who was invited told JTA that the purpose of the meeting would be an exchange of views.

There would be other meetings the same day with other constituent groups, the donor said, confirming reports of the meeting from a number of Jewish community officials.

Romney and President Obama have intensified outreach to Jewish voters and supporters in this presidential election year.

On Monday, the White House hosted some 70 Jewish leaders in a bid to reassure them that the Obama administration was determined to keep Iran from acquiring a nuclear bomb.

Romney to meet with Jewish donors Read More »

Iran talks show common ground, disagreement

A first day of talks between Iran and world powers about a nuclear program that the West suspects is aimed at nuclear bomb research showed a “fair amount of disagreement” but also areas of common ground, a senior U.S. official said.

“I believe we have the beginning of a negotiation,” the official said of the talks, which opened on Wednesday and lasted late into the evening. “But still we have to come to closure…about what are the next appropriate steps.”

Iran was “engaged” in the discussions, and the meeting would continue into a second day on Thursday, the official said, adding that there was “plenty to go on” for a potential further round of talks.

Earlier on Wednesday, envoys for Iran and the United States, Russia, China, France, Britain and Germany exchanged unusually detailed proposals at the talks in Baghdad in hopes of defusing a long standoff over suspicions Tehran’s atomic energy program may be a disguised quest for nuclear weapons.

Both sides have been publicly upbeat about the scope for an outline deal following a 15-month diplomatic freeze and exploratory talks in Istanbul last month.

Reporting by Andrew Quinn; Editing by Michael Roddy

Iran talks show common ground, disagreement Read More »

Anne Frank, in her family’s eyes

Anne Frank, the single most famous name among the six million victims of the Shoah, entered the realm of history and literature with the posthumous publication of her own diary and has been used — and, some would argue, abused — by others who have depicted her on the stage and screen, in novels and comic books. So much so that the flesh-and-blood Anne Frank has wholly disappeared under the accretion of myth and magical thinking.

Now comes another answer to the provocative question that Nathan Englander posed in the title of his controversial story, “ Anne Frank, in her family’s eyes Read More »

Calendar Picks and Clicks: May 26-June 1, 2012

SAT | MAY 26

“THE IMMIGRANT”
Haskell, a young Jewish immigrant fleeing Russian pogroms in 1909, settles in the Baptist community of Hamilton, Texas, in this musical adaptation of playwright Mark Harelik’s tale of a stranger in a strange land. As he struggles to achieve the American Dream without caving in to assimilation, Haskell’s unlikely, longtime friendship with a local banker, Milton, is tested by political differences over World War II. Based on the true story of Harelik’s late grandfather, this West Coast Jewish Theatre’s production features a klezmer-meets-Copeland soundtrack with music by Steven M. Alper and lyrics by Sarah Knapp. Sat. Through July 15. 8 p.m. $28-$35. Pico Playhouse, 10508 W. Pico Blvd., Los Angeles. (323) 860-6620. wcjt.org.

WED | MAY 30

BETHENNY FRANKEL
Reality TV star (“Bethenny Ever After”), author, entrepreneur and chef sign copies of her debut novel, “Skinnydipping.” Echoing Frankel’s experiences, the tale follows aspiring actress Faith Brightstone, who finds reality TV stardom in New York when her Hollywood dreams don’t pan out. Wed. 6 p.m. Free. Vroman’s Bookstore, 695 E. Colorado Blvd., Pasadena. (626) 449-5320. vromansbookstore.com.

“CLIENT 9: THE RISE AND FALL OF ELIOT SPITZER”
Oscar-winning director Alex Gibney (“Taxi to the Dark Side”) examines the call-girl scandal that brought down New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer and whether his political enemies engineered the investigation. A Q-and-A with sibling producers Jedd and Todd Wider follows. Part of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences’ Contemporary Documentaries series. Wed. 7 p.m. Free. Linwood Dunn Theater, 1313 Vine St., Hollywood. (310) 247-3600. oscars.org/events-exhibitions.

SANDRA BERNHARD
The wry comedian, actress and pop-culture anthropologist brings her one-woman show, “Sandrology,” to REDCAT. Backed by a high-octane rock band, Bernhard skewers the worlds of contemporary culture, politics and celebrity, much the way she does on Bravo’s “Watch What Happens Live.” Wed. Through June 3. 8 p.m. $50-$55. Roy and Edna Disney/CalArts Theater, 631 W. Second St., downtown. (213) 237-2800. redcat.org.

THU | MAY 31

THE ISRAEL CONFRENCE
Nearly 1,000 attendees are expected at this two-day interactive forum, which brings companies together to increase business and investment opportunities between Israel and California. Speakers from the technology, media and consumer-product sectors today include Yoram Yaacovi, general manager of Microsoft Israel R&D; Roy Bahat, president of IGN Entertainment; Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf CEO Mel Elias; and Gideon Weiss, business development manager for Iron Dome builder Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd. The day concludes with a Music & Media & Entertainment Reception featuring Israeli performers along with wine and cheese from Israel. Thu. Through June 1. 7:30 a.m.-9:30 p.m. $395 (advance), $480 (door). Luxe Hotel, 11461 Sunset Blvd., Los Angeles. (310) 445-5388. theisraelconference.org.

SOULFARM
Founded in Israel by Grammy-winning lead guitarist C Lanzbom and lead singer/guitarist Noah Solomon, Soulfarm brings its guitar leads, dance rhythms and strong percussion breaks to The Joint as part of Jewlicious’ second concert series. Organized with the concert-going, cash-strapped young adult in mind, the concerts featuring nationally recognized and independent talent and $2 brews. Live music and cheap alcohol — what more could you ask for? Co-sponsored by Asahi beer. Thu. 8 p.m. $10 (advance), $15 (door, space permitting). The Joint, 8771 W. Pico Blvd., Los Angeles. (310) 277-5544. jewliciousfestival.com.

MIKE STOLLER
The legendary composer — one half of songwriting team Leiber and Stoller, who crafted tunes for Elvis Presley (“Hound Dog,” “Jailhouse Rock”), Peggy Lee (“Is That All There Is?”) and others — appears in conversation with songwriter and producer Steve Barri to discuss his life and career. A book signing of “Hound Dog: The Leiber and Stoller Autobiography” follows. Thu. 2 p.m. $5 (general), free (Skirball members). Skirball Cultural Center, 2701 N. Sepulveda Blvd., Los Angeles. (310) 440-4500. skirball.org.

FRI | JUNE 1

JEFF GARLIN
Celebrating his 50th birthday and 30 years in comedy, the acclaimed actor-comedian (“Curb Your Enthusiasm”) appears in person to perform an evening of stand-up. Tribe favorite Sarah Silverman, Patton Oswalt (“Ratatouille,” “King of Queens”), Bob Odenkirk (“Breaking Bad”), Bill Burr and others join Garlin. Expect irreverent, wacky and Jewy humor. Proceeds benefit The Littlest Tumor Foundation. Fri. 9 p.m. $40 (online only). Largo at the Coronet, 366 N. La Cienega Blvd., Los Angeles. (310) 855-0350. largo-la.com.

Calendar Picks and Clicks: May 26-June 1, 2012 Read More »

It’s finally clear why I saw ‘Titanic’ nine times

It took Daniel Mendelsohn’s discursive and insightful essay on the enduring appeal of the Titanic story for me to realize that it wasn’t my raging teenage hormones that drew me back to the Riviera movie theater over and over again (even if tickets were just $3.75). Rather, it was my inner feminist.

Mendelsohn elucidates in The New Yorker:

Cameron gave his film a feminist rather than a patriotic spin. Rose, of a “good” but impoverished Main Line family, is being married off to the loathsome Cal Hockley, who seals their engagement with the gift of a blue diamond that had belonged to Louis XVI. (“We are royalty,” he smugly tells her as he drapes the giant rock around her neck.) “It’s so unfair,” she sighs during a conversation with her odiously snobbish mother, who, in the same scene, is lacing Rose tightly into a corset. “Of course it’s unfair,” the mother retorts. “We’re women.” Small wonder that nearly half the female viewers under twenty-five who saw the movie went to see it a second time within two months of its release, and that three-quarters of those said that they’d see it again.

Yes, that was me. Except worse; and more so. It also explains, at least in part, why it was worth director James Cameron spending an additional $17 million to transpose the film into 3-D.

Cameron’s picture is about breaking the bonds of family, a point made by means of a clever contrast between its two leading ladies—Rose and the Titanic. At the start of the movie, the ship speeds confidently forward while Rose is described as being “trapped” and unable to “break free” (that corset, that mother); by the end, the ship is immobilized, while the girl strikes off on her own, literally and figuratively. She has to abandon the piece of panelling she’s climbed onto—and tearfully let go of Jack (now a frozen corpse), which she’d promised never to do—in order to swim for help.

Rose, in other words, saves herself; in the end the Titanic is the sacrifice, the price that must be paid for Rose’s rebirth as a girl who acts by and for herself.

Comparing the Titanic story with classic Greek tragedy, Mendelsohn identifies two powerful archetypes that keep luring audiences back to the ill-fated tale.

…the most obvious thing about the Titanic’s story: it uncannily replicates the structure and the themes of our most fundamental myths and oldest tragedies. Like Iphigenia, the Titanic is a beautiful “maiden” sacrificed to the agendas of greedy men eager to set sail; the forty-six-thousand-ton liner is just the latest in a long line of lovely girl victims, an archetype of vulnerable femininity that stands at the core of the Western literary tradition.

But the Titanic embodies another strain of tragedy. This is the drama of a flawed and self-destructive hero, a protagonist of great achievements and overweening presumption. The ship starts out like Oedipus: admired, idolized, hailed as different, special, exalted. Sophocles’ play derives its horrible excitement from a relentless exposition of its protagonist’s fall from grace—and from the fact that his confidence and his talents are what prevented him from seeing the looming disaster. Cameron understood this… The director knew that there is an ancient theatrical pleasure, not totally free of Schadenfreude, in watching something beautiful fall apart.

All this is why we keep watching Cameron’s movie, and why we can’t stop thinking about the Titanic. The tale irresistibly conflates two of the oldest archetypes in literature.

It’s finally clear why I saw ‘Titanic’ nine times Read More »