fbpx

September 15, 2010

BCC cantor first to be trained in post-Holocaust Germany

Under a banner of balloons arranged as a rainbow flag, Juval Porat, 32, stands on the bimah at Beth Chayim Chadashim (BCC) on a warm June evening. In front of a packed sanctuary, Rabbi Lisa Edwards presents him for the first time as the Reform synagogue’s new cantor.

Over the past few years, Porat has become something of an international celebrity in the world of Judaism. He is the first cantor trained in Germany since the Holocaust, and many Jews view his accomplishment as a symbol of the future of the German Jewish community.

But rather than embrace his new role, Porat responds to questions about the attention as if it weren’t happening at all.

“I never made a decision to become the first German-trained cantor,” he said in an interview following the installation. “It just happened to me. Why should it be controversial?”

Born in Israel, Porat spent his childhood shuttling between his country of origin and Berlin, Germany. His parents instilled in him a strong Jewish identity and sent him to yeshiva. After graduating, he went to school to become an architect.

But an early passion for music led him to pursue singing in his free time, and it was then that he discovered his true path: Jewish music.

“The impulse to become a professional cantor didn’t come out of nowhere,” he said. “I started working as a cantorial soloist, and seven years later, I asked myself, ‘Why shouldn’t I do this professionally?’ ”

At that time, there were no professional cantorial training programs in Germany. Rather than travel out of the country, Porat approached the leadership at Abraham Geiger College, a rabbinic seminary in Potsdam, and helped to develop — and ultimately graduate from — a cantorial studies program.

Shortly after his graduation from Abraham Geiger, Porat met Bruce Maxwell, BCC’s president, through a friend in Berlin. The two hit it off, and Maxwell suggested that Porat try for the position left open after BCC’s longtime cantor, Fran Chalin, retired in 2007.

At Maxwell’s request, Porat sent MP3s containing his music to the synagogue’s leadership and arranged for an interview via Skype. At 2 p.m. Los Angeles time — midnight in Berlin — he logged in and auditioned for the BCC staff and board members.

“We heard Juval’s voice, and it felt comfortable to us,” Edwards said. “It was a combination of gentleness and power; we wanted to hear more immediately.”

Porat then traveled to Los Angeles to help lead High Holy Days services in 2008. He did as well in person as he had online, and by July 2009 he was on a plane to Los Angeles to begin his new job.

To some, Porat is such a perfect fit for the synagogue, his meeting with Maxwell seems almost fated.

“Some people think someone else had a hand in it,” said Edwards. Now, following his installation, Porat is beginning to settle into American life.

Meanwhile, those around him are realizing that his accomplishment represents not just a new page in German Judaism, but in American Judaism as well.

“[Juval] can help us dissolve the prejudices we do have about Germany, as someone who was very comfortable living as a Jew in Berlin — which is so surprising,” Edwards said.

But Porat also brings with him a certain level of honesty — despite having felt comfortable growing up as a Jew in Berlin, he can still recall a time when the events of World War II were at the forefront of his mind.

“I had my Holocaust phase, where I dealt very intensely with the entire theme,” he said. “I remember very consciously closing the door to it, but it’s not locked — it’s open on every Holocaust Memorial Day.”

That Porat should find himself at BCC is also notable — the Pico-Robertson district synagogue has been known for its groundbreaking role as one of the first LGBT synagogues to be accepted into the Reform movement.

And with that history, Edwards is perhaps better able to understand why Porat downplays his sudden role as an international Jewish leader.

“I think when you’re a trailblazer, you don’t realize it,” she said. “Like GLBT rights. We didn’t set out to be pioneers; we didn’t set out to be activists. We wanted to be something we weren’t allowed to be. I think it was the same for him.”

In the meantime, Porat is primarily concerned with adjusting to his new surroundings. His first few months in Los Angeles, he said, were difficult and led to a few months of significant depression. “I was really confronted with my dark side,” he said. “It was a tough time.”

But now, as he adjusts to everything — from the American manner of speaking and dressing to the necessity of having a car — he’s beginning to feel more at home.

Porat has signed on for three years at BCC, and while he and the congregation’s leadership have not discussed what will happen when that three years is up, Edwards has high hopes for what the young cantor will go on to do.

“He’s such a wonderful example of what could be,” she said. “Can someone who’s living in L.A. effect change in Germany? I like to think he can.”

BCC cantor first to be trained in post-Holocaust Germany Read More »

This Is my God

I cannot say that I have ever rejected God. There were some years in which I was not interested, and that, perhaps, is the greatest rejection of all (much more than hostility or lack of faith). But then the world seemed too small, too confined, far too senseless without Him; to me, He is the all-embracing, all-encompassing being, the great Mystery, the transcending reality that is above, beyond and behind all that exists.

It is also true that God plays hide-and-seek with us; He hides and I must seek Him so that I can cry triumphantly: “I’ve found Him!” This rediscovery happens throughout a lifetime. There are always periods when there is a feeling of distance, almost of alienation — even if one observes the formalities of ritual and formal prayer; yet these times are followed by a renewed finding, a new love.

How can one characterize God? Whatever we say is going to be both right and wrong. All the good, beautiful and sweet things in this world are actually His attributes and every day, nay, every moment, we see Him differently. What is the color of a bubble of water? That depends upon the angle from which I look at it; and when I gaze at it long enough, I shall see in it all the colors and hues: great, mighty, compassionate, gracious, awesome, un-understandable — but forever extremely close to me.

It seems to me that every human being, not just religious (or exceptionally holy) people, experiences such moments of grace — these are moments when one feels the great Presence, how God is close, nearby. This feeling is actually a lot more frequent than people think, but we cannot always identify it. Some people get this feeling from seeing or feeling any kind of sublimity. Others may just suddenly experience, without any prior preparation or knowledge, the bliss and security of this closeness.

God is not just the originator of the universe — an entity that gave the universe an initial momentum and then left it. I believe that creation is an ongoing process; the world is being created anew each and every day, each and every instant. The world’s existence is the result of God’s constant presence within it, and there is no life and no reality without that constant Presence — at any given moment in time, in every single particle of matter.

I also believe that God supervises the smallest details and every single individual: His Providence and interest are not confined to human beings but include every created thing. And just as He is the ruler of the great galaxies, just as He is in charge of the great eras, so, too, He is present and oversees every movement that every human being makes, and also every flying bird, every fish in the water, every skipping grasshopper, every leaf drifting in the wind, every wisp of smoke coming out of a chimney — God watches over all these things and cares about them.

Thus, God has a plan for each and every human being and every single creature. But I cannot know what His plan is for me. Every now and then, I ask Him (and sometimes receive an answer, either directly or indirectly): What am I supposed to do now according to the plan? Have I done what You wanted me to do or have I erred and misunderstood You?

At the same time, no matter whether we acknowledge it or not, each of us has a personal relationship with God. My relationship is always personal and private; precisely because He is so infinite and unlimited, He relates personally and specifically to me. It always is a one-to-one relationship, when I am by myself as well as when I am in a crowd; somehow we are always alone together.

That is why prayer, no matter the form, is so important. Prayer is always a conversation with God. It is the way we relate feelings, fears or aspirations, or make requests. There is also prayer for one’s community, for one’s own nation or for the world as a whole. And prayer can also be a different sort of conversation: an urge to say thank you, to say, “How good it is that You are there.”

We pray to God; in some ways, He answers us with decisions about our fates. Every person’s private reckoning, either for the good or for the bad, is far too complex, and no one is able to appraise oneself properly, let alone appraise others. Every year, there is a time of judgment (on Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur, and also later) in which one’s fate for the coming year is generally determined.

But these judgments are not absolutely decisive. Judgment and verdict are according to man’s state at that particular moment in time. When one makes a dramatic change in life, either for better or for worse, one’s verdict changes accordingly. The “book” in which God “writes and seals” judgments is, in a way, like word-processing on a computer: on any day, at any time, it is possible to change, delete and rewrite.

More than that — we can appeal. Human beings have the right (perhaps also the duty) to converse with God, to ask things from Him and also to complain to Him, to claim: “You’re not right.” It is the same right that a child has to cry and to say, “Why do other kids get more?” A human being is entitled to complain. God wants us to be honest with Him. But still and all, He cannot be judged.

On Nov. 7, to honor the completion of Rabbi Steinsaltz’s 45-volume translation and commentary, all are invited to join a day of global learning. For more information, visit this story at jewishjournal.com.

Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz has spent nearly five decades translating the Talmud into modern languages.  On Nov. 7, to honor the completion of his 45-volume translation and commentary, all are invited to join a day of global learning. For more information, visit www.TheGlobalDay.com.

This Is my God Read More »

A flotilla for Gilad Shalit

Some Jews just don’t follow rules. Rosh Hashanah is a time for self-reflection and deep humility —a time when we are supposed to look at what we did wrong, not what others did wrong — but on the first Day of Judgment, my lunchtime crowd followed another script.

I was sitting with a group of friends at the home of Ariel and Sarah Wiendling, fellow members of Young Israel of Century City, on the first day of Rosh Hashanah, a day so steeped in Divine judgment that tradition says we shouldn’t sleep on that day, lest we get “caught napping.”

Personally, I was on my “aim higher” kick, trying not to let the hoopla of the holidays interfere with the spiritual imperative of looking inward. On top of that, the previous day I had read an article by a rabbi about how this is a good time of the year for Jews to apologize to the world for our collective sins of the past year.

So when my friend Ariel asked me about my trip to Israel, my response gravitated to anything having to do with looking inward and self-criticism. In particular, I spoke about my visit with the father of Gilad Shalit, who has been sitting vigil in a protest tent across from the prime minister’s home in Jerusalem.

What a dramatic example of self-criticism, I said. A terrorist enemy kidnaps an Israeli soldier, refuses to release him in exchange for over 1,000 prisoners, and Jews protest against their own prime minister.

After someone lamented the inability of the IDF to rescue Shalit (à la Entebbe), the conversation took a theological turn — someone making the point that “if God is behind everything,” then maybe there’s a redeeming feature to this tragedy that we are not seeing. Someone else took umbrage at this idea: How dare we look for redeeming features to such a deep personal tragedy? While we have the luxury of debating Gilad Shalit’s situation over a delicious meal, where is he right now? What meal is he having?

Obviously, I hadn’t picked the best example to honor the Jewish instinct for self-criticism. Of all the things Jews have to apologize for to the world, Gilad Shalit is surely not one of them.

But that’s when the conversation got interesting: If it’s wrong to beat ourselves up over Gilad Shalit, and if it’s not enough to say that “God is behind this,” then what?

Then let’s have a marketing meeting.

By the time dessert was served, we had reached a consensus: Jewish groups should organize an international flotilla for Gilad Shalit that should land in Gaza and ask for a Red Cross visit for the Jewish prisoner. The flotilla should consist of one main ship — with the flags of Israel and the Red Cross — and small boats to represent each day that Shalit has been imprisoned.

Everyone at the table loved the idea so much that they said, “I’m in.”

In fact, this is what I’m hearing every time I bring it up: people saying, “I’m in.” And many are adding to the idea: Have Shalit’s father lead the flotilla; do it around Passover and bring him a care package that will include matzahs; seek the support of Jewish organizations from across the spectrum, from J Street to ZOA, each representing a different boat; enlist human rights organizations who are usually Israel’s worst critics; go right to the top, getting the endorsements of President Obama and Prime Minister Netanyahu, and so on.

Someone made the comment that a group tried to do something similar earlier this year, but that it wasn’t a hit because the “flotilla” was just in the New York harbor. Someone else said that because of Israel’s official naval blockade to Gaza, organizers will need to get Israel to make an exception for Shalit’s flotilla, which would be worth it if only for the PR value.

I’m sure anyone who tries to pull this off will encounter a million obstacles, but I’d love to see someone give it a shot — and at least make a lot of noise trying.

The request is so modest and reasonable — a Red Cross visit with a prisoner — that it makes it difficult for anyone to be against it, and it gives supporters of Israel from the left to the right a concrete cause they can all get behind. And by making such a modest request, and staying away from the messy politics of prisoner exchanges, we can turn Gilad Shalit into a household name on the lips of the world’s most influential leaders. 

It’s true that this doesn’t fit the Rosh Hashanah themes of humility and personal self-reflection, and it certainly doesn’t follow the rabbi’s message of making a collective Jewish apology to the world.

What it might represent, however, is a collective Jewish apology to Gilad Shalit for not having done more to free him, and maybe a way of including him in our process of becoming better Jews for the coming year.

David Suissa is the founder of OLAM magazine and OLAM.org. You can read his daily blog at suissablog.com and e-mail him at {encode=”suissa@olam.org” title=”suissa@olam.org”}.

A flotilla for Gilad Shalit Read More »

Boycott the boycotters

Anti-Israel activists are now putting all their energy into their Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign (BDS). Their goal is to portray Israel and Israelis as pariahs that should be excluded from all international spheres — diplomatic, political, economic, social and cultural.

Jews have been victims of such policies before. In the millennia of anti-Semitism in Europe and the Middle East, they have been singled out, demonized and excluded, as they were, for example, in 13th century England and 1930s Europe. The Jewish state, too, has experienced such policies since its founding, when Arab nations implemented strict exclusion and boycotts against Israel, most of which are still in place. The current global BDS campaign began in 2001 and grew after 2005, when Israel effectively defeated the terrorist campaign known as the Second Intifada. Today, hard-core anti-Israel activists around the world are feverishly lobbying artists, universities, churches, retailers, unions, municipalities, and other institutions to adopt BDS.

Any public figures, retailers, institutions or organizations that adopt or defer to BDS policies should themselves be boycotted.

They should be boycotted because they advocate destructive rather than constructive measures. BDS is anti-coexistence, undermines peace efforts and does nothing to help Palestinians begin state building, improve their lives or move toward reconciliation.

They should be boycotted because BDS policies are fundamentally anti-Semitic even though some of the movement’s advocates are Jews. The campaign uses the propaganda techniques and imagery of classical anti-Semitism now applied not to individual Jews, but to the world’s largest Jewish community and its only Jewish state. Boycott activists strip away all context for Israel’s actions, such as ongoing terrorism and the virulent ideology that propels it, in order to depict Israel as motivated by sheer malice in what are often simply modern blood libels. They obsessively put a microscope on Israel to detect its flaws and expect it to live up to standards they do not expect of any other nation. They never call for BDS against nations that do systematically commit war crimes and human rights abuses, such as Ahmadinejad’s Iran, Bashir’s Sudan, Lebanon’s apartheid practices against Palestinians or Turkey’s occupation of northern Cyprus and violent repression of its Kurdish minority.

They should be boycotted because of their hypocrisy. Where was the outrage of the boycotters, who claim to be champions of social justice and human rights, when the Palestinian suicide bombing campaign targeted innocent Jewish men, women and children, and Hamas fired thousands of rockets from Gaza into Israeli communities, murdering toddlers and turning daily life into a lethal game of Russian roulette? Where were they when Ahmadinejad denied the Holocaust even as he called for genocide against Jews? Where is their protest against the Judeophobic incitement that dominates the Middle East? Their callous indifference and implicit support of murdering Jews is both morally perverse and anti-Semitic.

Above all, they should be boycotted because they endorse the agendas of the dictatorial regimes and radical Islamist groups who share their hatred of the Jewish state and who are also enemies of human rights, social justice values, tolerance and modernity. These states and groups like Hamas oppress women, persecute religious and other minorities, and oppress their own citizens. Those who adopt BDS should be exposed and pay the price for supporting and enabling the intransigent enemies of humanitarian and liberal values.

Boycotting those who comply with BDS means that any university that does not unequivocally denounce campus divestment campaigns should not receive another nickel from donors who care about fairness, the survival of Israel and modern liberal values. Recording artists who refuse to perform in Israel should be labeled as extremists for the regressive, anti-Semitic values they endorse. Fair-minded people should stop buying their records and attending their concerts. Consumers should boycott any retailers who refuse to stock Israeli products, and should support the new StandWithUs campaign, BIG and RIG (Buy Israeli Goods and Request Israeli Goods).

It is time to expose the distorted values that drive the BDS movement and its alliance with the most repressive and dangerous forces in the world today.  It is time to unequivocally say no to this BDS movement and to all who would consider complying with it.

Roz Rothstein is international director of StandWithUs. Roberta Seid is education director of StandWithUs.

Boycott the boycotters Read More »

Fear of God

Twenty-one years ago, Francis Fukuyama, a Japanese American professor at Harvard University, published his famous essay “The End of History.” His thesis was brilliant. Fukuyama argued that the fall of the communist bloc was not just another event in human history but signaled a major turning point. Liberal democracy had won. From now on, it would spread unchallenged by other ideologies. Conflicts between nations would no longer be cloaked in ideology. They would be local and, therefore, solvable. Armed struggles would become a thing of the past, yesterday’s news. We had entered a new age, boring in the positive sense. History as we knew it, with its bloodbaths, had come to an end.

Fukuyama’s idea was compelling. It sounded so logical and so right.

It’s just a shame that the real world has not read Fukuyama’s essay.

Even a cursory examination of what has happened in the last 20 years shows us just how wrong Fukuyama was: George Bush and Saddam Hussein; Osama bin Laden and 9/11; North Korea and South Korea; Nasrallah and Hezbollah; Iran’s nuclear program in addition to Erdogan’s rise to power in Turkey; the election of Chavez in Venezuela and the victory of Hamas in elections in Gaza.

The end of ideology? The end of history? Not quite.

But let’s take a closer look. What most of these events have in common can be summed up in one word: religion.

Fukuyama, it appears, is not the only one who was mistaken. Nietzsche, too, seems to have made a misjudgment some hundred years earlier, when he declared that “God is dead.” God is not dead. Now, in the 21st century, God is more alive than ever, and not as a minor character in this reality show.

One may argue about whether this is a positive development or not, or whether religious faith has a place in the postmodern world. But such debates cannot alter the basic fact that more and more people today, all over the world, in every culture, in every language, are finding their way back to God.

This pursuit is, in some ways, frightening. Not because religion cannot be a wonderful thing, but because this search often ends up not in a place where religion is a source of comfort or spiritual uplift, but as a first step toward fundamentalism. Herein lies the grave and very real danger.

In its more benign manifestation, in the United States, Christian fundamentalism is on the rise. And we need no introduction to Islamic fundamentalism. But we need not go so far afield to learn about fundamentalism in Israel.  Unfortunately, Jewish fundamentalism is advancing right here in Israeli society.

Examples abound: Women are forced to ride in the back of the bus; girls from different ethnic communities are compelled to study in separate classrooms; youngsters in the Modern Orthodox youth movement B’nai Akiba are instructed to leave a concert where men and women perform together; and in order to avoid conflicting with fundamentalist religious beliefs, guides in the Stalactite Cave refrain from stating that these natural formations are hundreds of thousands of years old. This is the face of Jewish fundamentalism.

It could engulf and even sink the Zionist enterprise. It has happened to the Jewish people before in our history. This fundamentalist threat is sufficient grounds for the urgent — not ideological, but practical — need to strengthen the non-Orthodox streams of Judaism in Israel. Not because all Orthodoxy has to be fundamentalist — it isn’t and does not have to be. But if the worldwide trend continues, and if religion becomes a more and more central element in Israel as well as elsewhere, Israel cannot enter this struggle with only one Jewish-religious alternative. Non-Orthodox Judaism in Israel, both Masorti/Conservative and Reform, is the life preserver Israel needs if it wishes to remain afloat as a Jewish and democratic country.

Yizhar Hess is the executive director and CEO of the Masorti movement in Israel.

Fear of God Read More »

Ownership of Yom Kippur: a personal journey

As a young Jewish boy in 1960s Glasgow, Scotland, I accompanied my father and my two elder brothers every Yom Kippur to the shul he had founded. We always sat in the first row, and to this day I still feel the awesome intensity of prayer, the deep anguish of my father’s generation as they dwelt on their sins and looked for redemption.

Yet I always found it hard to take part in the ceremony, including the customary fast that plays such an integral role in this solemn day. While God judged “who will live and who will die,’’ I was distracted, as if catching smells of my mother’s best homemade cooking — a mix of spicy Jewish fare and Scottish fresh salmon. My mind and soul could not connect to the set pattern of the prayers. The text had already been written — in Hebrew, which I didn’t understand; we were there to follow what had been said for hundreds of years. I just wanted the service to finish and to return to my family, sitting down at the dining table for the traditional “breaking of the fast’’ meal. What was missing? The concept of the need to re-examine our deeds and choose a better path for the future is fine — but it has to come from me: I need to be part of the process, I have to take ownership of my redemption.

Fast forward to Oct. 6, 1973, Yom Kippur. I had left the cold streets of Glasgow for the boiling Beit She’an Valley and for the life of a kibbutznik. On that day, I heard Golda Meir’s dramatic announcement that Israel had been caught in a surprise attack on two fronts — in the North against the Syrian army, and in the South against the Egyptian forces. Nervously, I immediately packed a few things and traveled all night to join my tank unit in the South. Reports said that Egyptian hordes were already crossing the Suez Canal. My mind was heavy, and my pulse was truly racing. Would I, the son of Glasgow’s Jewish deli family, really go into battle? Could I come back seriously injured? Or perhaps even worse? I had never thought about these questions, yet for the first time in my life, I was in physical danger. I was faced with a terrible judgment call — to kill or be killed. 

I spent six months with my tank unit, which held its position after the cease-fire in Egypt. And during those long, moonless desert nights, I thought long and hard with my brothers in arms about what had happened. How was Israel so surprised by the Arab attack? Didn’t Israel have the best intelligence community in the world? The problem, I realized, was with the concept of victory that Israel had built since 1967, not with our ability to gather raw intelligence. No matter what the Israeli leadership saw on the ground, they never believed that Arabs would attack. Our mindset had grown so out of touch with the geopolitical realities that it had led all of us astray. Here was a call toward self-awareness and self-understanding in a language that I understood. Here was my Yom Kippur. This was a lesson whose price was so terrible that I could never forget. From then on , Yom Kippur became for me a Yom Kippur of reflection, of challenging the relevancy of my mindset in regard to the reality I lived in.

Fast forward to this year’s Yom Kippur, September 2010. I live in Jerusalem and work at the Reut Institute, a strategy group working to influence the State of Israel, committed to making Israel and the Jewish world a safe and prosperous place for all. Reut understands that to fulfill its core mission requires more than a traditional Yom Kippur every year. It requires a ‘’Yom Kippur concept’’ every day — a constant , systematic re-examination of Israel’s behavior in relationship to reaching its goal of peace and prosperity. And to be successful, it requires a methodology like Reut’s that allows one to tashlich, to throw away one’s misconceptions while retaining one’s core ideals.

All of us create our own Yom Kippur from our life experiences. Each of us has memories of the past, the struggles faced and the vows made for the future. We can’t afford the luxury of falling into a false sense of security.  Too much talk of atoning, too little real adapting the way we think and how we behave has tragically affected many crossroads in Jewish history. We have to see Yom Kippur and other days as opportunities to re-examine our mindset, to challenge our usual behavior, to make the adaptations needed in order to fulfill our goals as individuals and as citizens of Israel and the Jewish world. The terrible price of an alternative Yom Kippur was paid in full by so many of my generation in 1973 .

I wish each and every one of you a soul-searching Yom Kippur and an easy fast.

Martin Ben Moreh is program director of Judaism, Zionism and Israeli Society at the Reut Institute, Israel.

Ownership of Yom Kippur: a personal journey Read More »

The rebirth of Holocaust survivor Jacob ‘Jack’ Garfein

On May 11, 1946, a 15-year-old boy named Jacob Garfein, one of the first Holocaust child survivors to arrive in New York, attended a Mother’s Day celebration in honor of Mrs. David M. Levy, chairman and benefactor of the national women’s division of the United Jewish Appeal drive. The New York Times note read: “Jacob, a red-cheeked, red-headed boy who lost his mother, father and sister in German concentration camps — two of them in a crematorium — and who recalls how he had to help bury 15 to 18 corpses a day in [Bergen-]Belsen, gave the flowers in a simple tribute of thanks from the Jewish children who are still alive in Europe.”

Before the war, Jacob — now known as Jack Garfein, and as a renowned actor, stage director and filmmaker — had a peaceful childhood in his native Czechoslovakia, where he lived with his mother, Zionist leader father and younger sister.

With the start of World War II, the Garfein family was fractured and Jack’s life forever changed. One of his recurring memories of this time is of his arrival at Auschwitz, where most children under 16 were exterminated.

“I was 13 and clung to my mother, but she wanted me to go over with the men. I didn’t want to go. I felt so jealous of my sister. Finally, my mother really cursed me out, and she stayed with my sister. A cousin of mine who stayed with her told me that at one point my aunt was about to convince her to leave, when my sister said, ‘Don’t let me go, Mommy.’ And so, she looked at my cousin and said, ‘I can’t go.’ I got on line among the men, and I came in front of Mengele. He touched my face and asked me, ‘How old are you?’ I don’t know why … I said, ‘16.’ ”

It is unfathomable how the boy endured what followed. The end of the war found him at the overcrowded Bergen-Belsen concentration camp, where he was liberated by British soldiers in April 1945. His 48-pound body was transported to a makeshift hospital adjacent to the camp. He remembers the day his caretakers turned his bed toward the window so that he could witness the burning of the typhus-infected Bergen-Belsen, where a month before, children such as Anne and Margot Frank had perished. For Jack, the experience was cathartic.

The Swedish government, through the intervention of Count Folke Bernadotte, offered 10,000 temporary visas for survivors.  Orphaned and in a wheelchair, Jacob was transported to a displaced-persons camp in Malmö, Sweden. Once there, he began the process of recuperation under the care of a young nun named Sister Hedvig. In a matter of months, he began taking his first steps.

Many people didn’t survive the liberation, due to malnourishment, illness and suicide, which makes Garfein’s life story the happy exception. An uncle’s affidavit secured him a visa for New York, and he arrived there in January 1946.

Garfein began learning English and nurturing his interest in acting; he also found strength in his Jewish faith. The hard work paid off, and in 1947 the United Jewish Appeal awarded him a scholarship to attend the prestigious Dramatic Workshop of the New School, where he studied acting and directing under Lee Strasberg and Erwin Piscator.

In Garfein’s recently released book, “Life and Acting: Techniques for the Actor,” he explains how personal experience at times became overwhelming during performances: “As I said my line about being quarantined and not allowed to deliver the letter to Romeo, I thought again of all those that didn’t make it through the war, and my own good fortune of being on a stage in New York. In fact, the thought overtook me. I quickly put a fist in my mouth to suppress the emotion.”

He moved on to study directing in Strasberg’s newly established Actors Studio, where he directed the stage adaptation of Calder Willingham’s novel “End as a Man.” The play eventually served as his Broadway debut.

On Sept. 18, 1955, it was announced that Sam Spiegel, producer of such films as John Huston’s “The African Queen” (1951) and Elia Kazan’s “On the Waterfront” (1954), had purchased the rights to produce “End as a Man.” When Spiegel offered the film to director Kazan, the filmmaker suggested Garfein for the job. To prepare for his film directorial debut, Garfein spent months observing Kazan during the filming of “Baby Doll” (1956), a film that featured the work of Carroll Baker, to whom Garfein was married at that time. The film adaptation of “End as a Man,” titled “The Strange One,” dealt with strong issues that ranged from homosexuality to race relations; considering the state of affairs of 1950s America, Spiegel requested less screen visibility for the African American actors in order to avoid censorship in the South. Garfein refused and paid the consequences — he was prohibited from editing the final version.

In July 1960, Garfein began shooting “Something Wild,” a semi-independent production based on the novel “Mary Ann,” which followed the traumas of a rape victim, played by Baker. The film’s $900,000 budget was financed by United Artists, and this time the film was shot on Garfein’s terms. One of his main approaches was to shoot chronologically, to help maintain the intensity of the actors’ performances.

In 1961, during a promotional tour of “Something Wild,” Garfein found himself back in Sweden. At a press conference, he asked for help finding his “second mother,” the woman who tended to him during his rehabilitation. By then a former nun and married, Hedvig Ekberg was photographed by the press with Garfein at their reunion. But this time, it was the once-vigorous woman who was in frail health. Garfein embraced her and offered to pay for her treatment.

Garfein’s prolific career includes helping found New York’s Harold Clurman Theatre and Samuel Beckett Theatre; and the acting schools Actors Studio in West Hollywood, the Actors and Directors Lab in New York and Los Angeles, and Le Studio Jack Garfein in Paris, where he currently directs and teaches.

On Sept. 18 and 19, the UCLA Film & Television Archive will spotlight the director’s film legacy with “Method and Madness: The Films of Jack Garfein,” including screenings of “The Strange One” (1957) and “Something Wild” (1961). The tribute at the Billy Wilder Theater at the Hammer Museum will also feature a screening of Brian McKenna’s documentary, “A Journey Back” (1987), which follows Garfein’s return to Auschwitz.

Garfein will be in attendance at all screenings and will sign copies of his new book on Sept. 19 in the lobby of the theater.

“Method and Madness: The films of Jack Garfein” will take place at the: Billy Wilder Theater_, Courtyard Level, Hammer Museum, 10899 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90024._ For more information: www.cinema.ucla.edu  or (310) 206-8013.

The rebirth of Holocaust survivor Jacob ‘Jack’ Garfein Read More »

Much is new as Ramat Zion turns 50

Temple Ramat Zion approached Rosh Hashanah with rejuvenated optimism this year. Celebrating its 50th anniversary, the Conservative synagogue recently hired a new rabbi, Ahud Sela, and a new education director, Rabbi Helene Kornsgold.

“There’s so much energy among the members and the board to start a new era, to write the next chapter in the history of Ramat Zion,” said Sela, a former assistant rabbi with Sinai Temple. “And it’s so wonderful to see.”

David Perren, Ramat Zion’s current president, said the Northridge congregation has recovered from the shock of Rabbi Steven Tucker’s sudden death five years ago.

“We hit a point where we said, ‘That was then. Now, let’s move forward.’ We don’t have to feel sorry for ourselves anymore,” Perren said. “We have a lot to offer.”

Temple Ramat Zion — or TRZ, as it is known by its congregants — had about 700 member families in 1980. Now, with 315 families, the synagogue’s leadership is looking at different ways to increase its numbers by reaching out to prospective and existing members.

While still maintaining its traditional appeal as a mainstream Conservative synagogue, Ramat Zion is hoping to attract younger families and Jews with progressive tastes.

“For the traditionalists, it is your father’s temple,” Cantor Paul Dorman said. “Then, for the young people and nontraditionalists, it’s not your father’s temple.”

For many years, Ramat Zion has offered a variety of religious services that bridge the gap between traditional and progressive. Each week, services are geared toward a specific demographic, Dorman explained.

“We’ve had very innovative programs for our services,” he said. “We’ve really tried to cover all the different groups within the Conservative movement.”

Sela, who studied bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania and received his rabbinic ordination from New York’s Jewish Theological Seminary (JTS), has several goals in mind for the temple.

“I would love this synagogue to be a model for all synagogues in terms of how we take care of our members, how we take care of the rest of the community,” he said. “I think a lot of synagogues would have folded having the tsuris they had, but this synagogue didn’t because of the members they have.”

This year, TRZ extended free High Holy Days tickets to members’ adult children (ages 25 and under) still living at home and lowered membership fees for families with children enrolled in a Jewish day school.

Kornsgold, a JTS graduate and former rabbi-in-residence at Pressman Academy, said she wants to make sure youth are involved from the beginning.

“I want to get the younger kids and their families involved from an early age, so that you don’t see bar and bat mitzvahs as that day [when you say], ‘Oh great, [now] I can stop coming.’  Instead, you want to still come, and your parents are involved,” she said.

The synagogue already features a strong tutoring program, which began to support b’nai mitzvah and expanded to include other tutors, who act as madrichim, or leaders, for younger children in the Hebrew school.

Older children also play strong roles in the congregation. The temple’s dedicated United Synagogue Youth chapter is a particular point of pride. 

“The synagogue made the statement 25 years ago: We tell our kids they’re adults. We’re going to start treating them like adults,” Sela said. “Within a few months, they’re given a tremendous amount of responsibility, and they step up.”

Located across the street from Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School, TRZ is hoping to develop a more comprehensive partnership with the school, which is not affiliated with a specific synagogue.

During the summer, Ramat Zion takes advantage of the warm weather, offering Friday night services under the stars, with barbecues organized by the synagogue’s men’s club.

“It reminds me of Central Park, when you would go to hear the free concerts,” Dorman said. “You’re outside on the courtyard, out on the grass, and young kids are running around. It’s such a beautiful, relaxed community event.”

Kornsgold and Dorman both emphasize the inherent thoughtfulness that exists throughout the TRZ community.

“It’s a very haimish congregation,” Kornsgold said. “I don’t think there’s an English word for it. You just feel it.”

Much is new as Ramat Zion turns 50 Read More »

Yom Kippur: The power of dialogue

Thirty-nine years ago, Dov Indig, a young soldier in the Israel Defense Force tank corps, sat on guard duty in the Golan Heights. Joining him was a reserve soldier, many years older than Dov. During their four hours of guard duty, they engaged in a deep conversation about religion. It must have been a fascinating exchange; Dov came from Yeshivat Kerem B’Yavneh, a Hesder yeshiva where students combine Torah study and military service in combat units, and the reservist came from a Hashomer Hatzair kibbutz, the epitome of secular Zionism.

The reservist told Dov of his teenage daughter, Talya, an 11th-grade student in the kibbutz high school. Talya’s class had recently spent one week in a Gesher (Bridge) seminar, where secular Israeli teenagers interact with religious kids and study Judaism from a more traditional perspective. The seminar raised many questions in Talya’s mind about Judaism, and her father felt unable to address her questions. He liked Dov’s approach and asked permission from Dov for Talya to write to him with her questions. Dov happily obliged, and what ensued was a two-year exchange of letters between Dov and Talya.

This thought-provoking and moving exchange of letters between two pre-Facebook teenagers is found in the 2005 book “Michtavim L’Talya” (“Letters to Talya”). I was recently rereading the book, and it dawned on me how deeply this book relates to one of the most powerful lessons of Yom Kippur.

The Mishnah teaches: “For transgressions between man and fellow man, Yom Kippur effects no atonement, until they have pacified each other” (Yoma 8:9). This Mishnah emphasizes the interpersonal angle of Yom Kippur, one that far transcends cantorial performances and eloquent sermons. It teaches us that fasting and prayer do not resolve differences between people. It reminds us that in addition to talking to God with a scripted text, Yom Kippur is also about talking things out with family, friends and those with whom we have different religious and political viewpoints.

So it was with Dov and Talya. They lived in the same country but came from two extremely different places in life.

Dov was a Modern Orthodox religious Zionist yeshiva student. His worldview was rooted in God, Torah, halachah and the uniqueness of the Jewish people.

Talya was the classic secular Zionist. Raised in a secular kibbutz, her worldview was rooted in the modern-day values of Western civilization, of an enlightened Zionist society in Israel and in the Jewish people as agents of universalism.

Egalitarianism was not a part of Dov’s world, and God was not present in Talya’s upbringing and education. Dov frowned upon the abandonment of Torah and saw it as part of the cause for the breakdown of family values in Israeli society. Talya could not accept the separation of boys and girls in social venues such as dancing or holding hands on a date. What these vastly different youngsters had in common was their youth, their curiosity about the other and their willingness to talk with each other.

From very different perspectives, Dov and Talya exchanged letters for two years. It sounds scripted, but it’s all true. They spoke about God, Torah, Zionism, values, Jewish history and the political direction of their country vis-à-vis the Arabs. As we enter Yom Kippur, these intellectually brave teenagers remind all of us that the power of dialogue — face to face, Facebook or through written letters — has the power to bridge gaps, resolve differences and bring people closer together.

In fact, here is Talya’s very last letter to Dov (my own translation):

Dear Dov,

I received your letter today, and I am already writing back. Perhaps this is because of your previous letter, where you wrote of the possibility of war with Syria. I am deeply worried; so much so that I have decided that this year, for the very first time in my life, I am fasting and going to the synagogue on Yom Kippur. There I will pray that there will be no war, and that the high alert of our soldiers is a false alarm.

So, what do you think? Would you have ever believed two years ago, when we started writing to each other, that a cynical kibbutz girl, who bothers you with all sorts of annoying questions, is actually going to the synagogue and fasting on Yom Kippur? I hope I can hold up throughout the day!

I have changed so much these past two years, as my world has opened up to ideas that I would have never imagined in my wildest dreams. It’s all thanks to you, Dov, thanks to your fantastic letters, and thanks to our fascinating dialogues and exchanges. It now seems to me that I am living from letter to letter, so please, hurry up and write more, as I await your letters.

I wish you a good and wonderful New Year.

Yours, who thinks about you often,

Talya.

Dov never had a chance to respond. Hewas killed on the second day of the YomKippur war.

On this Yom Kippur, let us commit to continue their dialogue.

Rabbi Daniel Bouskila is director of special projects for the Sephardic Educational Center (secjerusalem.org). He blogs at rabbidanielbouskila.blogspot.com.

Yom Kippur: The power of dialogue Read More »

Obituaries: Sept. 17-23, 2010

Samuel Abrams died July 27 at 87. Survived by significant other Barbara Warner. Hillside

Samuel Aronow. Survived by wife Ida; daughters Pamela and Linda; son Michael. Hillside

Alexander Britton died Aug. 2 at 88. Survived by daughter Michele (Jeffrey) Bass; son Sanford; 2 grandchildren. Mount Sinai

David Chauncey died July 29 at 90. Survived by daughters Ilene (Stuart) Berman and Suzy Krebs; son Jeffrey (Roni); 9 grandchildren; 4 great-grandchildren. Hillside

Stanley Cohen died Aug. 13 at 79. Survived by wife Constance J.; daughters Sharon (Robert) McColl and Sandra (David) Tirato; son Scott (Lori); 7 grandchildren; 6 great-grandchildren. Mount Sinai

Philip Leonard Clousner died Aug. 10 at 79. Survived by wife Norma; daughters Sari (Barry) Kahn and Marcy (Arthur) Gajewsky; son Mitch (Deborah); 6 grandchildren. Mount Sinai

Jan Czuker died April 28 at 78. Survived by wife Susanne; sons Edward and Mark; grandchildren. Sholom Chapels

Eva David died Aug. 11 at 83. Survived by son Ronald; daughters, Catherine O’Krent and Judith (Leon Bloomfield); 4 grandchildren. Mount Sinai

William Derrett died July 28 at 79. Survived by wife Deann; daughter Nita; son-in-law Alfredo Ortiz; 1 grandchild. Hillside

Neal Adam Dublinsky died July 23 at 47. Survived by mother Bertha; brother Harry. Sholom Chapels

Evelyn Elias died April 29 at 85. Survived by daughter Carol (Michael) Wolf. Sholom Chapels

Betty Elkes died May 4 at 87. Survived by daughters Jane Helfman and Judy Goldman; grandchildren. Sholom Chapels

Doris Farber died Aug. 4 at 84. Survived by daughter Karen (Randall) McKenzie; son Ronald Farber; 3 grandchildren; brother Irving (Carol) Ross. Mount Sinai

Saul Fischler died Aug. 14 at 87. Survived by wife Sylvia; daughters Ruth Zasadil, Maddee Sadofski and Louise Kass; son Sheldon; 11 grandchildren; 5 great-grandchildren. Sholom Chapels

Melvyn Winton Flack died Aug. 6 at 80. Survived by wife Ruth; sons Mitchell (Leticia) and Jonathan; 3 grandchildren; sisters Arlene (Harold) Schneider and Joan (Ron) Adler. Mount Sinai

Sylvia Zittell Fleischman died Aug. 3 at 97. Survived by daughter Arlene Austin; son Arthur (Brenda) Zittell; 3 grandchildren; 4 great-grandchildren; brother Melvin (Hilda) Stone. Mount Sinai

John Frankel died May 2 at 93. Survived by wife Miriam; daughters Marilyn and Judith; son Daniel. Sholom Chapels

Janet Fried died Aug. 4 at 80. Survived by niece, Michele (Benjamin) Susman. Mount Sinai

Mary Friedman died Aug. 5 at 98. Survived by daughter Susan Klein; son Bruce David (Monique); 4 grandchildren; 2 great-grandchildren; brother Benjamin Hershberg; sister Shirley Brown. Mount Sinai

Maximillian Friedman died May 2 at 93. Survived by wife Ruth; daughter Roberta Friedman Cummings; grandchildren. Sholom Chapels

Jay Martin Goldfarb died May 4 at 59. Survived by wife Donna; sons Dan Equinoss and David (Jesse) Birtness; 2 grandchildren; parents Isidore and Ann; sister Paula (Lou) Loomis; brother Robert (Barbi). Sholom Chapels

Ronald David Goldman died Aug. 11 at 79. Survived by daughter Shoshanna (Chris) Sugahara; sons Steve (Diana), Rick (Cindy), Jeffrey (Kimberly) and Jordan; 7 grandchildren. Mount Sinai

Sherry Haynes died Aug. 12 at 70. Survived by husband Allen; daughter Wendy (Steven Cohn); sons Todd (Bryan O’Keefe) and Shawn (Pamela); 2 grandchildren. Mount Sinai

Gayle S. Honig died Aug. 13 at 74. Survived by husband Martin; sons Keith (Kelly), Craig (Rebecca) and Michael (Emily); 6 grandchildren; and brother Eliot (Harriet) Spero. Mount Sinai

Robert Howard died Aug. 2 at 65. Survived by wife Nancy; sons Jonathon and Jay. Hillside

Nina Huberman died Aug. 12 at 85. Survived by sons Murray (Ruth) and Sam; 2 granddaughters. Mount Sinai

Rosalind Judson died Aug. 14 at 94. Survived by daughter Marjorie (Bernard) Halio; 1 grandson. Mount Sinai

Ilse Kahn died July 25 at 96. Survived by sons Ron and Steven. Hillside

Josef Karp died May 7 at 89. Survived by daughters Marcy Cherin and Cory Dickman; 3 grandchildren; 4 great-grandchildren; sisters Gertrude Schwartz and Martha Rose. Sholom Chapels

Ilene Kasch died Aug. 15 at 80. Survived by daughter Andrea (Jay) Rhode; sons Brian (Kathleen McKernin) and Tony (Debbie); 6 grandchildren. Mount Sinai

Harry S. King died Aug. 12 at 85. Survived by daughter Vicki (Paul) Wojcik; son Dennis; stepdaughters Randi (Steven Hall) Nadler and Beth Sanders; 6 grandchildren. Mount Sinai

Hildy Klein died Aug. 7 at 88. Survived by daughter Alisa; sons Richard (Julie) and Daniel. Mount Sinai

Phyllis Lita Lane died July 29 at 77. Survived by daughter Wendy (Julian); son; 2 grandchildren; sister Rhona.

Margaret Lesonsky died Aug. 2 at 29. Survived by husband Seymour; daughters Paula Lesonsky Snyder and Sandra Kuhlman; son Eric; 2 grandchildren. Mount Sinai

Charles Lubock died Aug. 11 at 95. Survived by son Paul; and 2 grandsons. Mount Sinai

Ilene Sandy Margolis died April 28 at 51. Survived by brothers Larry and Gary. Sholom Chapels

Max Mehlworm died May 4 at 95. Survived by daughter Edie Robbins. Sholom Chapels

Lawrence Paul Mellon died Aug. 3 at 86. Survived by daughters Jody (Charles) Levy and Pamela (Eliot) Bieda; son Victor (Chavee Lerer); 8 grandchildren. Sholom Chapels

Ruben Nachenberg died July 28 at 93. Survived by daughter Helen (Stan) Kaye-Landsman; son William (Judith); grandchildren; great-granchildren. Mount Sinai

Norma D. Pell died Aug. 12 at 93. Survived by sons Edward “Bud” (Pamela Rand) and Richard (Rasmee); 1 granddaughter; sister Elayne Jaffe; brother David (Germaine) Jaffe. Mount Sinai

Harriet Petzall died Aug. 10 at 94. Survived by daughter Joan (Richard) Seder; 2 grandchildren. Mount Sinai

Edgar Philips Jr.  died Aug. 1 at 82. Survived by wife Shirley; daughter Elaine (Jonathon) Peltz; son Michoel (Miriam); 11 grandchildren. Hillside

Rosalia Porat died July 21 at 90. Survived by son Ami. Sholom Chapels

Stanley Rappoport died Aug. 2 at 83. Survived by wife Lonette; daughters Claire and Eve; son David. Mount Sinai

Scott Regberg died July 30 at 59. Survived by wife Melanie Miller; son Hayden; stepmother Lee; brother Rick. Hillside

Pola Ritter died Aug. 3 at 82. Survived by daughter Susan; son Eric. Hillside

Marlene Robin died July 3 at 93. Survived by daughters Diane (John Johnson) and Anne (Steve Cleveland); son Jerry; 1 grandchild; brother Ted Leonte. Hillside.

Michael Lee Robin died Aug. 12 at 63. Survived by wife Meryl; daughter Amy; son Terry; 2 grandchildren; sisters Susanne Goldstein and Sheila Catz. Mount Sinai

Eduardo Sarlui died July 20 at 84. Survived by wife Etka; daughter Helen (Howard) Szabo; son Luis (Anna); stepchildren Hugo and Ruth Rose. Sholom Chapels

Ruth Schacht died May 7 at 83. Survived by sons Sam Rose, Geoffrey Schacht-Rose and David; ; 4 grandchildren; brother Jules Steinberg. Sholom Chapels

Evelyn R. Seigel died July 30 at 93. Survived by daughter Pat (Mark) Fisher; son Dan (Elaine); 6 grandchildren; 2 great-grandchildren; sisters Sally (Mort) Kirshner and Joyce Mack. Mount Sinai

Rosalyn Simon died July 26 at 95. Survived by stepdaughter Judy Hara. Hillside

Joseph Slafer died Aug. 3 at 98. Survived by son Loren. Sholom Chapels

Sheldon Harvey Solid died July 29 at 64. Survived by sister Lynn (Mike) Fruchter. Sholom Chapels

Joseph Steinschriber died Aug. 13 at 85. Survived by sons Steve (Cindy), Frank (Julie) and Philip (fiancee Diane); 5 grandchildren. Sholom Chapels

Benjamin Stoffer died Aug. 15 at 87. Survived by wife Rose; sons Martin (Sharon) and David (Janice); 4 grandchildren. Mount Sinai

Annette “Toni” Taback died Aug. 6 at 79. Survived by son Michael (Desiree); 2 grandchildren. Mount Sinai

Ruth Ellwood Teitelbaum died Aug. 13 at 101. Survived by daughters Barbara Akin and Marcia (John) Rosenberg; son Richard (Margalit) Ellwood; 3 grandchildren; 5 great-grandchildren. Mount Sinai

Dorothy Von Horn died Aug. 3 at 90. Survived by grandniece Ilona Linden. Hillside

Sidney Weger died July 27 at 91. Survived by wife Arline; daughters Roberta (Bob) Knox and Elisa; 5 grandchildren; sister Deana (Alvin) Rosenthal. Hillside

Bernard West died July 29 at 92. Survived by daughters Isabel (Robert) Davis and Ellen; 2 grandchildren. Hillside

Anne Wexler died July 27 at 92. Survived by daughters Charlene Griffith, Karen Gross and Janice Minsberg; 2 grandchildren. Hillside

Paul Wirth died Aug.2 at 94. Survived by wife Ruth; daughter Diane Schwartz; 1 grandchild. Mount Sinai

Marianne Wishner died Aug. 8 at 63. Survived by husband Stanley; daughter Leigh; son Benjamin (Michelle). Mount Sinai

The Jewish Journal publishes obituary notices free of charge. Please send an e-mail in the above format with the name, age and survivors of the deceased to {encode=”obits@jewishjournal.com” title=”obits@jewishjournal.com”}.  If you have any questions, e-mail or call (213) 368-1661, ext. 116.

Obituaries: Sept. 17-23, 2010 Read More »